- Linux-stable-mirror - lists.linaro.org

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net: mana: Switch to page pool for jumbo frames" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x fa37a8849634db2dd3545116873da8cf4b1e67c6 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025041725-pureblood-hurled-3913@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From fa37a8849634db2dd3545116873da8cf4b1e67c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz(a)microsoft.com> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 09:32:37 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] net: mana: Switch to page pool for jumbo frames Frag allocators, such as netdev_alloc_frag(), were not designed to work for fragsz > PAGE_SIZE. So, switch to page pool for jumbo frames instead of using page frag allocators. This driver is using page pool for smaller MTUs already. Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Fixes: 80f6215b450e ("net: mana: Add support for jumbo frame") Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz(a)microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Long Li <longli(a)microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Shradha Gupta <shradhagupta(a)linux.microsoft.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1742920357-27263-1-git-send-email-haiyangz@microso… Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c index e190d5ee5154..3ac73d97337e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c @@ -661,30 +661,16 @@ int mana_pre_alloc_rxbufs(struct mana_port_context *mpc, int new_mtu, int num_qu mpc->rxbpre_total = 0; for (i = 0; i < num_rxb; i++) { - if (mpc->rxbpre_alloc_size > PAGE_SIZE) { - va = netdev_alloc_frag(mpc->rxbpre_alloc_size); - if (!va) - goto error; + page = dev_alloc_pages(get_order(mpc->rxbpre_alloc_size)); + if (!page) + goto error; - page = virt_to_head_page(va); - /* Check if the frag falls back to single page */ - if (compound_order(page) < - get_order(mpc->rxbpre_alloc_size)) { - put_page(page); - goto error; - } - } else { - page = dev_alloc_page(); - if (!page) - goto error; - - va = page_to_virt(page); - } + va = page_to_virt(page); da = dma_map_single(dev, va + mpc->rxbpre_headroom, mpc->rxbpre_datasize, DMA_FROM_DEVICE); if (dma_mapping_error(dev, da)) { - put_page(virt_to_head_page(va)); + put_page(page); goto error; } @@ -1676,7 +1662,7 @@ static void mana_rx_skb(void *buf_va, bool from_pool, } static void *mana_get_rxfrag(struct mana_rxq *rxq, struct device *dev, - dma_addr_t *da, bool *from_pool, bool is_napi) + dma_addr_t *da, bool *from_pool) { struct page *page; void *va; @@ -1687,21 +1673,6 @@ static void *mana_get_rxfrag(struct mana_rxq *rxq, struct device *dev, if (rxq->xdp_save_va) { va = rxq->xdp_save_va; rxq->xdp_save_va = NULL; - } else if (rxq->alloc_size > PAGE_SIZE) { - if (is_napi) - va = napi_alloc_frag(rxq->alloc_size); - else - va = netdev_alloc_frag(rxq->alloc_size); - - if (!va) - return NULL; - - page = virt_to_head_page(va); - /* Check if the frag falls back to single page */ - if (compound_order(page) < get_order(rxq->alloc_size)) { - put_page(page); - return NULL; - } } else { page = page_pool_dev_alloc_pages(rxq->page_pool); if (!page) @@ -1734,7 +1705,7 @@ static void mana_refill_rx_oob(struct device *dev, struct mana_rxq *rxq, dma_addr_t da; void *va; - va = mana_get_rxfrag(rxq, dev, &da, &from_pool, true); + va = mana_get_rxfrag(rxq, dev, &da, &from_pool); if (!va) return; @@ -2176,7 +2147,7 @@ static int mana_fill_rx_oob(struct mana_recv_buf_oob *rx_oob, u32 mem_key, if (mpc->rxbufs_pre) va = mana_get_rxbuf_pre(rxq, &da); else - va = mana_get_rxfrag(rxq, dev, &da, &from_pool, false); + va = mana_get_rxfrag(rxq, dev, &da, &from_pool); if (!va) return -ENOMEM; @@ -2262,6 +2233,7 @@ static int mana_create_page_pool(struct mana_rxq *rxq, struct gdma_context *gc) pprm.nid = gc->numa_node; pprm.napi = &rxq->rx_cq.napi; pprm.netdev = rxq->ndev; + pprm.order = get_order(rxq->alloc_size); rxq->page_pool = page_pool_create(&pprm);

1 week, 5 days

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] cpufreq: Reference count policy in cpufreq_update_limits()" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 9e4e249018d208678888bdf22f6b652728106528 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025041718-elastic-salutary-56db@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 9e4e249018d208678888bdf22f6b652728106528 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 21:39:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Reference count policy in cpufreq_update_limits() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Since acpi_processor_notify() can be called before registering a cpufreq driver or even in cases when a cpufreq driver is not registered at all, cpufreq_update_limits() needs to check if a cpufreq driver is present and prevent it from being unregistered. For this purpose, make it call cpufreq_cpu_get() to obtain a cpufreq policy pointer for the given CPU and reference count the corresponding policy object, if present. Fixes: 5a25e3f7cc53 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Driver-specific handling of _PPC updates") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/Z-ShAR59cTow0KcR@mail-itl Reported-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek(a)invisiblethingslab.com> Cc: All applicable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar(a)linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1928789.tdWV9SEqCh@rjwysocki.net diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 0cf5a320bb5e..3841c9da6cac 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -2809,6 +2809,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_update_policy); */ void cpufreq_update_limits(unsigned int cpu) { + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy); + + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); + if (!policy) + return; + if (cpufreq_driver->update_limits) cpufreq_driver->update_limits(cpu); else

1 week, 5 days

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] cpufreq: Reference count policy in cpufreq_update_limits()" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 9e4e249018d208678888bdf22f6b652728106528 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025041717-parrot-computing-a78a@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 9e4e249018d208678888bdf22f6b652728106528 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 21:39:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Reference count policy in cpufreq_update_limits() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Since acpi_processor_notify() can be called before registering a cpufreq driver or even in cases when a cpufreq driver is not registered at all, cpufreq_update_limits() needs to check if a cpufreq driver is present and prevent it from being unregistered. For this purpose, make it call cpufreq_cpu_get() to obtain a cpufreq policy pointer for the given CPU and reference count the corresponding policy object, if present. Fixes: 5a25e3f7cc53 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Driver-specific handling of _PPC updates") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/Z-ShAR59cTow0KcR@mail-itl Reported-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek(a)invisiblethingslab.com> Cc: All applicable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar(a)linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1928789.tdWV9SEqCh@rjwysocki.net diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 0cf5a320bb5e..3841c9da6cac 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -2809,6 +2809,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_update_policy); */ void cpufreq_update_limits(unsigned int cpu) { + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy); + + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); + if (!policy) + return; + if (cpufreq_driver->update_limits) cpufreq_driver->update_limits(cpu); else

1 week, 5 days

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] cpufreq: Reference count policy in cpufreq_update_limits()" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 9e4e249018d208678888bdf22f6b652728106528 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025041717-ethanol-copartner-7800@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 9e4e249018d208678888bdf22f6b652728106528 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 21:39:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Reference count policy in cpufreq_update_limits() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Since acpi_processor_notify() can be called before registering a cpufreq driver or even in cases when a cpufreq driver is not registered at all, cpufreq_update_limits() needs to check if a cpufreq driver is present and prevent it from being unregistered. For this purpose, make it call cpufreq_cpu_get() to obtain a cpufreq policy pointer for the given CPU and reference count the corresponding policy object, if present. Fixes: 5a25e3f7cc53 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Driver-specific handling of _PPC updates") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/Z-ShAR59cTow0KcR@mail-itl Reported-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek(a)invisiblethingslab.com> Cc: All applicable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar(a)linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1928789.tdWV9SEqCh@rjwysocki.net diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 0cf5a320bb5e..3841c9da6cac 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -2809,6 +2809,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_update_policy); */ void cpufreq_update_limits(unsigned int cpu) { + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy); + + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); + if (!policy) + return; + if (cpufreq_driver->update_limits) cpufreq_driver->update_limits(cpu); else

1 week, 5 days

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] cpufreq: Reference count policy in cpufreq_update_limits()" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 9e4e249018d208678888bdf22f6b652728106528 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025041716-saffron-absently-1e05@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 9e4e249018d208678888bdf22f6b652728106528 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 21:39:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Reference count policy in cpufreq_update_limits() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Since acpi_processor_notify() can be called before registering a cpufreq driver or even in cases when a cpufreq driver is not registered at all, cpufreq_update_limits() needs to check if a cpufreq driver is present and prevent it from being unregistered. For this purpose, make it call cpufreq_cpu_get() to obtain a cpufreq policy pointer for the given CPU and reference count the corresponding policy object, if present. Fixes: 5a25e3f7cc53 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Driver-specific handling of _PPC updates") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/Z-ShAR59cTow0KcR@mail-itl Reported-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek(a)invisiblethingslab.com> Cc: All applicable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar(a)linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1928789.tdWV9SEqCh@rjwysocki.net diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 0cf5a320bb5e..3841c9da6cac 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -2809,6 +2809,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_update_policy); */ void cpufreq_update_limits(unsigned int cpu) { + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy); + + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); + if (!policy) + return; + if (cpufreq_driver->update_limits) cpufreq_driver->update_limits(cpu); else

1 week, 5 days

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] cpufreq: Reference count policy in cpufreq_update_limits()" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 9e4e249018d208678888bdf22f6b652728106528 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025041716-chapter-squander-311f@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 9e4e249018d208678888bdf22f6b652728106528 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 21:39:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Reference count policy in cpufreq_update_limits() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Since acpi_processor_notify() can be called before registering a cpufreq driver or even in cases when a cpufreq driver is not registered at all, cpufreq_update_limits() needs to check if a cpufreq driver is present and prevent it from being unregistered. For this purpose, make it call cpufreq_cpu_get() to obtain a cpufreq policy pointer for the given CPU and reference count the corresponding policy object, if present. Fixes: 5a25e3f7cc53 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Driver-specific handling of _PPC updates") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/Z-ShAR59cTow0KcR@mail-itl Reported-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek(a)invisiblethingslab.com> Cc: All applicable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar(a)linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1928789.tdWV9SEqCh@rjwysocki.net diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 0cf5a320bb5e..3841c9da6cac 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -2809,6 +2809,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_update_policy); */ void cpufreq_update_limits(unsigned int cpu) { + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy); + + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); + if (!policy) + return; + if (cpufreq_driver->update_limits) cpufreq_driver->update_limits(cpu); else

1 week, 5 days

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] cpufreq: Reference count policy in cpufreq_update_limits()" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.12.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 9e4e249018d208678888bdf22f6b652728106528 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025041715-wrangle-trillion-713e@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.12.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 9e4e249018d208678888bdf22f6b652728106528 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 21:39:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Reference count policy in cpufreq_update_limits() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Since acpi_processor_notify() can be called before registering a cpufreq driver or even in cases when a cpufreq driver is not registered at all, cpufreq_update_limits() needs to check if a cpufreq driver is present and prevent it from being unregistered. For this purpose, make it call cpufreq_cpu_get() to obtain a cpufreq policy pointer for the given CPU and reference count the corresponding policy object, if present. Fixes: 5a25e3f7cc53 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Driver-specific handling of _PPC updates") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/Z-ShAR59cTow0KcR@mail-itl Reported-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek(a)invisiblethingslab.com> Cc: All applicable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar(a)linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1928789.tdWV9SEqCh@rjwysocki.net diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 0cf5a320bb5e..3841c9da6cac 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -2809,6 +2809,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_update_policy); */ void cpufreq_update_limits(unsigned int cpu) { + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy); + + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); + if (!policy) + return; + if (cpufreq_driver->update_limits) cpufreq_driver->update_limits(cpu); else

1 week, 5 days

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] cpufreq: Reference count policy in cpufreq_update_limits()" failed to apply to 6.13-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.13-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.13.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 9e4e249018d208678888bdf22f6b652728106528 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025041714-rabid-muskiness-3531@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.13.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 9e4e249018d208678888bdf22f6b652728106528 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 21:39:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Reference count policy in cpufreq_update_limits() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Since acpi_processor_notify() can be called before registering a cpufreq driver or even in cases when a cpufreq driver is not registered at all, cpufreq_update_limits() needs to check if a cpufreq driver is present and prevent it from being unregistered. For this purpose, make it call cpufreq_cpu_get() to obtain a cpufreq policy pointer for the given CPU and reference count the corresponding policy object, if present. Fixes: 5a25e3f7cc53 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Driver-specific handling of _PPC updates") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/Z-ShAR59cTow0KcR@mail-itl Reported-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek(a)invisiblethingslab.com> Cc: All applicable <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar(a)linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1928789.tdWV9SEqCh@rjwysocki.net diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 0cf5a320bb5e..3841c9da6cac 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -2809,6 +2809,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_update_policy); */ void cpufreq_update_limits(unsigned int cpu) { + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy); + + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); + if (!policy) + return; + if (cpufreq_driver->update_limits) cpufreq_driver->update_limits(cpu); else

1 week, 5 days

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] gpio: tegra186: fix resource handling in ACPI probe path" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 8323f3a69de6f6e96bf22f32dd8e2920766050c2 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025041751-faculty-suffix-09fc@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 8323f3a69de6f6e96bf22f32dd8e2920766050c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guixin Liu <kanie(a)linux.alibaba.com> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 11:23:49 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] gpio: tegra186: fix resource handling in ACPI probe path When the Tegra186 GPIO controller is probed through ACPI matching, the driver emits two error messages during probing: "tegra186-gpio NVDA0508:00: invalid resource (null)" "tegra186-gpio NVDA0508:00: invalid resource (null)" Fix this by getting resource first and then do the ioremap. Fixes: 2606e7c9f5fc ("gpio: tegra186: Add ACPI support") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Guixin Liu <kanie(a)linux.alibaba.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250327032349.78809-1-kanie@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski(a)linaro.org> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c index 6895b65c86af..d27bfac6c9f5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c @@ -823,6 +823,7 @@ static int tegra186_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct gpio_irq_chip *irq; struct tegra_gpio *gpio; struct device_node *np; + struct resource *res; char **names; int err; @@ -842,19 +843,19 @@ static int tegra186_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) gpio->num_banks++; /* get register apertures */ - gpio->secure = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "security"); - if (IS_ERR(gpio->secure)) { - gpio->secure = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); - if (IS_ERR(gpio->secure)) - return PTR_ERR(gpio->secure); - } + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "security"); + if (!res) + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); + gpio->secure = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); + if (IS_ERR(gpio->secure)) + return PTR_ERR(gpio->secure); - gpio->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "gpio"); - if (IS_ERR(gpio->base)) { - gpio->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 1); - if (IS_ERR(gpio->base)) - return PTR_ERR(gpio->base); - } + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "gpio"); + if (!res) + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1); + gpio->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); + if (IS_ERR(gpio->base)) + return PTR_ERR(gpio->base); err = platform_irq_count(pdev); if (err < 0)

1 week, 5 days

1
0
0 0

Re: [PATCH] xen-netfront: handle NULL returned by xdp_convert_buff_to_frame()

by Jürgen Groß

On 17.04.25 12:06, Alexey wrote: > > On 17.04.2025 11:51, Juergen Gross wrote: >> On 17.04.25 10:45, Alexey wrote: >>> >>> On 17.04.2025 10:12, Jürgen Groß wrote: >>>> On 17.04.25 09:00, Alexey wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 17.04.2025 03:58, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 18:34:01 +0000 Alexey Nepomnyashih wrote: >>>>>>> get_page(pdata); >>>>>> Please notice this get_page() here. >>>>>> >>>>>>> xdpf = xdp_convert_buff_to_frame(xdp); >>>>>>> + if (unlikely(!xdpf)) { >>>>>>> + trace_xdp_exception(queue->info->netdev, prog, act); >>>>>>> + break; >>>>>>> + } >>>>> Do you mean that it would be better to move the get_page(pdata) call lower, >>>>> after checking for NULL in xdpf, so that the reference count is only increased >>>>> after a successful conversion? >>>> >>>> I think the error handling here is generally broken (or at least very >>>> questionable). >>>> >>>> I suspect that in case of at least some errors the get_page() is leaking >>>> even without this new patch. >>>> >>>> In case I'm wrong a comment reasoning why there is no leak should be >>>> added. >>>> >>>> >>>> Juergen >>> >>> I think pdata is freed in xdp_return_frame_rx_napi() -> __xdp_return() >> >> Agreed. But what if xennet_xdp_xmit() returns an error < 0? >> >> In this case xdp_return_frame_rx_napi() won't be called. >> >> >> Juergen > > Agreed. There is no explicit freed pdata in the calling function > xennet_get_responses(). Without this, the page referenced by pdata > could be leaked. > > I suggest: > > case XDP_TX: > - get_page(pdata); > xdpf = xdp_convert_buff_to_frame(xdp); > + if (unlikely(!xdpf)) { > + trace_xdp_exception(queue->info->netdev, prog, act); > + break; > + } > + get_page(pdata); > err = xennet_xdp_xmit(queue->info->netdev, 1, &xdpf, 0); > if (unlikely(!err)) > xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf); > - else if (unlikely(err < 0)) > + else if (unlikely(err < 0)) { > trace_xdp_exception(queue->info->netdev, prog, act); > + xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf); > + } Could you please merge the two if () blocks, as they share the call of xdp_return_frame_rx_napi() now? Something like: if (unlikely(err <= 0)) { if (err < 0) trace_xdp_exception(queue->info->netdev, prog, act); xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf); } > break; > case XDP_REDIRECT: > get_page(pdata); > err = xdp_do_redirect(queue->info->netdev, xdp, prog); > *need_xdp_flush = true; > - if (unlikely(err)) > + if (unlikely(err)) { > trace_xdp_exception(queue->info->netdev, prog, act); > + __xdp_return(page_address(pdata), &xdp->mem, true, xdp); > + } > break; Juergen P.S.: please don't use HTML in emails

1 week, 5 days

2
2
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror