This reverts commit 4581403f67929d02c197cb187c4e1e811c9e762a.
While this fake hotplugging was a nice idea, it has shown that this feature
does not handle PCIe switches correctly:
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: can not insert [bus 43-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: [bus 43-41] end is updated to 43
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: can not insert [bus 43] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:00.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 43] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: can not insert [bus 44-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: [bus 44-41] end is updated to 44
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: can not insert [bus 44] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:02.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 44] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: can not insert [bus 45-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: [bus 45-41] end is updated to 45
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: can not insert [bus 45] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:06.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 45] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: can not insert [bus 46-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: [bus 46-41] end is updated to 46
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: can not insert [bus 46] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:0e.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 46] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:42: busn_res: [bus 42-41] end is updated to 46
pci_bus 0004:42: busn_res: can not insert [bus 42-46] under [bus 41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 41])
pci 0004:41:00.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 42-46] cannot be assigned for them
pcieport 0004:40:00.0: bridge has subordinate 41 but max busn 46
During the initial scan, PCI core doesn't see the switch and since the Root
Port is not hot plug capable, the secondary bus number gets assigned as the
subordinate bus number. This means, the PCI core assumes that only one bus
will appear behind the Root Port since the Root Port is not hot plug
capable.
This works perfectly fine for PCIe endpoints connected to the Root Port,
since they don't extend the bus. However, if a PCIe switch is connected,
then there is a problem when the downstream busses starts showing up and
the PCI core doesn't extend the subordinate bus number after initial scan
during boot.
The long term plan is to migrate this driver to the pwrctrl framework,
once it adds proper support for powering up and enumerating PCIe switches.
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 58 +-------------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 57 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
index 28f5f7acb92a..b10e8adc79bb 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
@@ -55,9 +55,6 @@
#define PARF_AXI_MSTR_WR_ADDR_HALT_V2 0x1a8
#define PARF_Q2A_FLUSH 0x1ac
#define PARF_LTSSM 0x1b0
-#define PARF_INT_ALL_STATUS 0x224
-#define PARF_INT_ALL_CLEAR 0x228
-#define PARF_INT_ALL_MASK 0x22c
#define PARF_SID_OFFSET 0x234
#define PARF_BDF_TRANSLATE_CFG 0x24c
#define PARF_DBI_BASE_ADDR_V2 0x350
@@ -134,9 +131,6 @@
/* PARF_LTSSM register fields */
#define LTSSM_EN BIT(8)
-/* PARF_INT_ALL_{STATUS/CLEAR/MASK} register fields */
-#define PARF_INT_ALL_LINK_UP BIT(13)
-
/* PARF_NO_SNOOP_OVERRIDE register fields */
#define WR_NO_SNOOP_OVERRIDE_EN BIT(1)
#define RD_NO_SNOOP_OVERRIDE_EN BIT(3)
@@ -1604,32 +1598,6 @@ static void qcom_pcie_init_debugfs(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
qcom_pcie_link_transition_count);
}
-static irqreturn_t qcom_pcie_global_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
-{
- struct qcom_pcie *pcie = data;
- struct dw_pcie_rp *pp = &pcie->pci->pp;
- struct device *dev = pcie->pci->dev;
- u32 status = readl_relaxed(pcie->parf + PARF_INT_ALL_STATUS);
-
- writel_relaxed(status, pcie->parf + PARF_INT_ALL_CLEAR);
-
- if (FIELD_GET(PARF_INT_ALL_LINK_UP, status)) {
- msleep(PCIE_RESET_CONFIG_WAIT_MS);
- dev_dbg(dev, "Received Link up event. Starting enumeration!\n");
- /* Rescan the bus to enumerate endpoint devices */
- pci_lock_rescan_remove();
- pci_rescan_bus(pp->bridge->bus);
- pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
-
- qcom_pcie_icc_opp_update(pcie);
- } else {
- dev_WARN_ONCE(dev, 1, "Received unknown event. INT_STATUS: 0x%08x\n",
- status);
- }
-
- return IRQ_HANDLED;
-}
-
static void qcom_pci_free_msi(void *ptr)
{
struct dw_pcie_rp *pp = (struct dw_pcie_rp *)ptr;
@@ -1774,8 +1742,7 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct dw_pcie_rp *pp;
struct resource *res;
struct dw_pcie *pci;
- int ret, irq;
- char *name;
+ int ret;
pcie_cfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
if (!pcie_cfg) {
@@ -1932,27 +1899,6 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err_phy_exit;
}
- name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "qcom_pcie_global_irq%d",
- pci_domain_nr(pp->bridge->bus));
- if (!name) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto err_host_deinit;
- }
-
- irq = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, "global");
- if (irq > 0) {
- ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
- qcom_pcie_global_irq_thread,
- IRQF_ONESHOT, name, pcie);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
- "Failed to request Global IRQ\n");
- goto err_host_deinit;
- }
-
- writel_relaxed(PARF_INT_ALL_LINK_UP, pcie->parf + PARF_INT_ALL_MASK);
- }
-
qcom_pcie_icc_opp_update(pcie);
if (pcie->mhi)
@@ -1960,8 +1906,6 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
-err_host_deinit:
- dw_pcie_host_deinit(pp);
err_phy_exit:
list_for_each_entry_safe(port, tmp, &pcie->ports, list) {
phy_exit(port->phy);
--
2.51.1
This reverts commit ba4a2e2317b9faeca9193ed6d3193ddc3cf2aba3.
While this fake hotplugging was a nice idea, it has shown that this feature
does not handle PCIe switches correctly:
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: can not insert [bus 43-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: [bus 43-41] end is updated to 43
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: can not insert [bus 43] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:00.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 43] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: can not insert [bus 44-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: [bus 44-41] end is updated to 44
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: can not insert [bus 44] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:02.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 44] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: can not insert [bus 45-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: [bus 45-41] end is updated to 45
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: can not insert [bus 45] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:06.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 45] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: can not insert [bus 46-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: [bus 46-41] end is updated to 46
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: can not insert [bus 46] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:0e.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 46] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:42: busn_res: [bus 42-41] end is updated to 46
pci_bus 0004:42: busn_res: can not insert [bus 42-46] under [bus 41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 41])
pci 0004:41:00.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 42-46] cannot be assigned for them
pcieport 0004:40:00.0: bridge has subordinate 41 but max busn 46
During the initial scan, PCI core doesn't see the switch and since the Root
Port is not hot plug capable, the secondary bus number gets assigned as the
subordinate bus number. This means, the PCI core assumes that only one bus
will appear behind the Root Port since the Root Port is not hot plug
capable.
This works perfectly fine for PCIe endpoints connected to the Root Port,
since they don't extend the bus. However, if a PCIe switch is connected,
then there is a problem when the downstream busses starts showing up and
the PCI core doesn't extend the subordinate bus number after initial scan
during boot.
The long term plan is to migrate this driver to the pwrctrl framework,
once it adds proper support for powering up and enumerating PCIe switches.
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
index 70c0ae8b7523..28f5f7acb92a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
@@ -136,7 +136,6 @@
/* PARF_INT_ALL_{STATUS/CLEAR/MASK} register fields */
#define PARF_INT_ALL_LINK_UP BIT(13)
-#define PARF_INT_MSI_DEV_0_7 GENMASK(30, 23)
/* PARF_NO_SNOOP_OVERRIDE register fields */
#define WR_NO_SNOOP_OVERRIDE_EN BIT(1)
@@ -1951,8 +1950,7 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err_host_deinit;
}
- writel_relaxed(PARF_INT_ALL_LINK_UP | PARF_INT_MSI_DEV_0_7,
- pcie->parf + PARF_INT_ALL_MASK);
+ writel_relaxed(PARF_INT_ALL_LINK_UP, pcie->parf + PARF_INT_ALL_MASK);
}
qcom_pcie_icc_opp_update(pcie);
--
2.51.1
This reverts commit 36971d6c5a9a134c15760ae9fd13c6d5f9a36abb.
While this fake hotplugging was a nice idea, it has shown that this feature
does not handle PCIe switches correctly:
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: can not insert [bus 43-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: [bus 43-41] end is updated to 43
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: can not insert [bus 43] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:00.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 43] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: can not insert [bus 44-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: [bus 44-41] end is updated to 44
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: can not insert [bus 44] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:02.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 44] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: can not insert [bus 45-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: [bus 45-41] end is updated to 45
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: can not insert [bus 45] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:06.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 45] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: can not insert [bus 46-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: [bus 46-41] end is updated to 46
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: can not insert [bus 46] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:0e.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 46] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:42: busn_res: [bus 42-41] end is updated to 46
pci_bus 0004:42: busn_res: can not insert [bus 42-46] under [bus 41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 41])
pci 0004:41:00.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 42-46] cannot be assigned for them
pcieport 0004:40:00.0: bridge has subordinate 41 but max busn 46
During the initial scan, PCI core doesn't see the switch and since the Root
Port is not hot plug capable, the secondary bus number gets assigned as the
subordinate bus number. This means, the PCI core assumes that only one bus
will appear behind the Root Port since the Root Port is not hot plug
capable.
This works perfectly fine for PCIe endpoints connected to the Root Port,
since they don't extend the bus. However, if a PCIe switch is connected,
then there is a problem when the downstream busses starts showing up and
the PCI core doesn't extend the subordinate bus number after initial scan
during boot.
The long term plan is to migrate this driver to the pwrctrl framework,
once it adds proper support for powering up and enumerating PCIe switches.
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
index c48a20602d7f..70c0ae8b7523 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
@@ -1927,10 +1927,6 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
- irq = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, "global");
- if (irq > 0)
- pp->use_linkup_irq = true;
-
ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "cannot initialize host\n");
@@ -1944,6 +1940,7 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err_host_deinit;
}
+ irq = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, "global");
if (irq > 0) {
ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
qcom_pcie_global_irq_thread,
--
2.51.1
This reverts commit 0e0b45ab5d770a748487ba0ae8f77d1fb0f0de3e.
While this fake hotplugging was a nice idea, it has shown that this feature
does not handle PCIe switches correctly:
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: can not insert [bus 43-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: [bus 43-41] end is updated to 43
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: can not insert [bus 43] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:00.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 43] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: can not insert [bus 44-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: [bus 44-41] end is updated to 44
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: can not insert [bus 44] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:02.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 44] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: can not insert [bus 45-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: [bus 45-41] end is updated to 45
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: can not insert [bus 45] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:06.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 45] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: can not insert [bus 46-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: [bus 46-41] end is updated to 46
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: can not insert [bus 46] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:0e.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 46] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:42: busn_res: [bus 42-41] end is updated to 46
pci_bus 0004:42: busn_res: can not insert [bus 42-46] under [bus 41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 41])
pci 0004:41:00.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 42-46] cannot be assigned for them
pcieport 0004:40:00.0: bridge has subordinate 41 but max busn 46
During the initial scan, PCI core doesn't see the switch and since the Root
Port is not hot plug capable, the secondary bus number gets assigned as the
subordinate bus number. This means, the PCI core assumes that only one bus
will appear behind the Root Port since the Root Port is not hot plug
capable.
This works perfectly fine for PCIe endpoints connected to the Root Port,
since they don't extend the bus. However, if a PCIe switch is connected,
then there is a problem when the downstream busses starts showing up and
the PCI core doesn't extend the subordinate bus number after initial scan
during boot.
The long term plan is to migrate this driver to the pwrctrl framework,
once it adds proper support for powering up and enumerating PCIe switches.
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 59 +------------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
index 07378ececd88..7eceec8c9c83 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
@@ -448,34 +448,6 @@ static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
.stop_link = rockchip_pcie_stop_link,
};
-static irqreturn_t rockchip_pcie_rc_sys_irq_thread(int irq, void *arg)
-{
- struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = arg;
- struct dw_pcie *pci = &rockchip->pci;
- struct dw_pcie_rp *pp = &pci->pp;
- struct device *dev = pci->dev;
- u32 reg;
-
- reg = rockchip_pcie_readl_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MISC);
- rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, reg, PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MISC);
-
- dev_dbg(dev, "PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MISC: %#x\n", reg);
- dev_dbg(dev, "LTSSM_STATUS: %#x\n", rockchip_pcie_get_ltssm(rockchip));
-
- if (reg & PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED) {
- if (rockchip_pcie_link_up(pci)) {
- msleep(PCIE_RESET_CONFIG_WAIT_MS);
- dev_dbg(dev, "Received Link up event. Starting enumeration!\n");
- /* Rescan the bus to enumerate endpoint devices */
- pci_lock_rescan_remove();
- pci_rescan_bus(pp->bridge->bus);
- pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
- }
- }
-
- return IRQ_HANDLED;
-}
-
static irqreturn_t rockchip_pcie_ep_sys_irq_thread(int irq, void *arg)
{
struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = arg;
@@ -508,29 +480,14 @@ static irqreturn_t rockchip_pcie_ep_sys_irq_thread(int irq, void *arg)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
-static int rockchip_pcie_configure_rc(struct platform_device *pdev,
- struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
+static int rockchip_pcie_configure_rc(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
{
- struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct dw_pcie_rp *pp;
- int irq, ret;
u32 val;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_ROCKCHIP_DW_HOST))
return -ENODEV;
- irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "sys");
- if (irq < 0)
- return irq;
-
- ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL,
- rockchip_pcie_rc_sys_irq_thread,
- IRQF_ONESHOT, "pcie-sys-rc", rockchip);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(dev, "failed to request PCIe sys IRQ\n");
- return ret;
- }
-
/* LTSSM enable control mode */
val = FIELD_PREP_WM16(PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE, 1);
rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, val, PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL);
@@ -542,17 +499,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_configure_rc(struct platform_device *pdev,
pp = &rockchip->pci.pp;
pp->ops = &rockchip_pcie_host_ops;
- ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(dev, "failed to initialize host\n");
- return ret;
- }
-
- /* unmask DLL up/down indicator */
- val = FIELD_PREP_WM16(PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED, 0);
- rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, val, PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_MISC);
-
- return ret;
+ return dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
}
static int rockchip_pcie_configure_ep(struct platform_device *pdev,
@@ -678,7 +625,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
switch (data->mode) {
case DW_PCIE_RC_TYPE:
- ret = rockchip_pcie_configure_rc(pdev, rockchip);
+ ret = rockchip_pcie_configure_rc(rockchip);
if (ret)
goto deinit_clk;
break;
--
2.51.1
This reverts commit ec9fd499b9c60a187ac8d6414c3c343c77d32e42.
While this fake hotplugging was a nice idea, it has shown that this feature
does not handle PCIe switches correctly:
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: can not insert [bus 43-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: [bus 43-41] end is updated to 43
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: can not insert [bus 43] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:00.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 43] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: can not insert [bus 44-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: [bus 44-41] end is updated to 44
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: can not insert [bus 44] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:02.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 44] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: can not insert [bus 45-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: [bus 45-41] end is updated to 45
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: can not insert [bus 45] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:06.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 45] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: can not insert [bus 46-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: [bus 46-41] end is updated to 46
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: can not insert [bus 46] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:0e.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 46] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:42: busn_res: [bus 42-41] end is updated to 46
pci_bus 0004:42: busn_res: can not insert [bus 42-46] under [bus 41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 41])
pci 0004:41:00.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 42-46] cannot be assigned for them
pcieport 0004:40:00.0: bridge has subordinate 41 but max busn 46
During the initial scan, PCI core doesn't see the switch and since the Root
Port is not hot plug capable, the secondary bus number gets assigned as the
subordinate bus number. This means, the PCI core assumes that only one bus
will appear behind the Root Port since the Root Port is not hot plug
capable.
This works perfectly fine for PCIe endpoints connected to the Root Port,
since they don't extend the bus. However, if a PCIe switch is connected,
then there is a problem when the downstream busses starts showing up and
the PCI core doesn't extend the subordinate bus number after initial scan
during boot.
The long term plan is to migrate this driver to the pwrctrl framework,
once it adds proper support for powering up and enumerating PCIe switches.
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
index 3e2752c7dd09..07378ececd88 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
@@ -541,7 +541,6 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_configure_rc(struct platform_device *pdev,
pp = &rockchip->pci.pp;
pp->ops = &rockchip_pcie_host_ops;
- pp->use_linkup_irq = true;
ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
if (ret) {
--
2.51.1
The sockmap feature allows bpf syscall from userspace, or based
on bpf sockops, replacing the sk_prot of sockets during protocol stack
processing with sockmap's custom read/write interfaces.
'''
tcp_rcv_state_process()
syn_recv_sock()/subflow_syn_recv_sock()
tcp_init_transfer(BPF_SOCK_OPS_PASSIVE_ESTABLISHED_CB)
bpf_skops_established <== sockops
bpf_sock_map_update(sk) <== call bpf helper
tcp_bpf_update_proto() <== update sk_prot
'''
When the server has MPTCP enabled but the client sends a TCP SYN
without MPTCP, subflow_syn_recv_sock() performs a fallback on the
subflow, replacing the subflow sk's sk_prot with the native sk_prot.
'''
subflow_syn_recv_sock()
subflow_ulp_fallback()
subflow_drop_ctx()
mptcp_subflow_ops_undo_override()
'''
Then, this subflow can be normally used by sockmap, which replaces the
native sk_prot with sockmap's custom sk_prot. The issue occurs when the
user executes accept::mptcp_stream_accept::mptcp_fallback_tcp_ops().
Here, it uses sk->sk_prot to compare with the native sk_prot, but this
is incorrect when sockmap is used, as we may incorrectly set
sk->sk_socket->ops.
This fix uses the more generic sk_family for the comparison instead.
Additionally, this also prevents a WARNING from occurring:
result from ./scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 337 at net/mptcp/protocol.c:68 mptcp_stream_accept \
(net/mptcp/protocol.c:4005)
Modules linked in:
...
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
<TASK>
do_accept (net/socket.c:1989)
__sys_accept4 (net/socket.c:2028 net/socket.c:2057)
__x64_sys_accept (net/socket.c:2067)
x64_sys_call (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:41)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
RIP: 0033:0x7f87ac92b83d
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Fixes: cec37a6e41aa ("mptcp: Handle MP_CAPABLE options for outgoing connections")
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen(a)linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub(a)cloudflare.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe(a)kernel.org>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 2d6b8de35c44..90b4aeca2596 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -61,11 +61,13 @@ static u64 mptcp_wnd_end(const struct mptcp_sock *msk)
static const struct proto_ops *mptcp_fallback_tcp_ops(const struct sock *sk)
{
+ unsigned short family = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_family);
+
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6)
- if (sk->sk_prot == &tcpv6_prot)
+ if (family == AF_INET6)
return &inet6_stream_ops;
#endif
- WARN_ON_ONCE(sk->sk_prot != &tcp_prot);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(family != AF_INET);
return &inet_stream_ops;
}
--
2.43.0
The spsc_queue is an unlocked, highly asynchronous piece of
infrastructure. Its inline function spsc_queue_peek() obtains the head
entry of the queue.
This access is performed without READ_ONCE() and is, therefore,
undefined behavior. In order to prevent the compiler from ever
reordering that access, or even optimizing it away, a READ_ONCE() is
strictly necessary. This is easily proven by the fact that
spsc_queue_pop() uses this very pattern to access the head.
Add READ_ONCE() to spsc_queue_peek().
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # v4.16+
Fixes: 27105db6c63a ("drm/amdgpu: Add SPSC queue to scheduler.")
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta(a)kernel.org>
---
I think this makes it less broken, but I'm not even sure if it's enough
or more memory barriers or an rcu_dereference() would be correct. The
spsc_queue is, of course, not documented and the existing barrier
comments are either false or not telling.
If someone has an idea, shoot us the info. Otherwise I think this is the
right thing to do for now.
P.
---
include/drm/spsc_queue.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/drm/spsc_queue.h b/include/drm/spsc_queue.h
index ee9df8cc67b7..39bada748ffc 100644
--- a/include/drm/spsc_queue.h
+++ b/include/drm/spsc_queue.h
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static inline void spsc_queue_init(struct spsc_queue *queue)
static inline struct spsc_node *spsc_queue_peek(struct spsc_queue *queue)
{
- return queue->head;
+ return READ_ONCE(queue->head);
}
static inline int spsc_queue_count(struct spsc_queue *queue)
--
2.49.0
From: Kairui Song <kasong(a)tencent.com>
This reverts commit 78524b05f1a3e16a5d00cc9c6259c41a9d6003ce.
While reviewing recent leaf entry changes, I noticed that commit
78524b05f1a3 ("mm, swap: avoid redundant swap device pinning") isn't
correct. It's true that most all callers of __read_swap_cache_async are
already holding a swap entry reference, so the repeated swap device
pinning isn't needed on the same swap device, but it is possible that
VMA readahead (swap_vma_readahead()) may encounter swap entries from a
different swap device when there are multiple swap devices, and call
__read_swap_cache_async without holding a reference to that swap device.
So it is possible to cause a UAF if swapoff of device A raced with
swapin on device B, and VMA readahead tries to read swap entries from
device A. It's not easy to trigger but in theory possible to cause real
issues. And besides, that commit made swap more vulnerable to issues
like corrupted page tables.
Just revert it. __read_swap_cache_async isn't that sensitive to
performance after all, as it's mostly used for SSD/HDD swap devices with
readahead. SYNCHRONOUS_IO devices may fallback onto it for swap count >
1 entries, but very soon we will have a new helper and routine for
such devices, so they will never touch this helper or have redundant
swap device reference overhead.
Fixes: 78524b05f1a3 ("mm, swap: avoid redundant swap device pinning")
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong(a)tencent.com>
---
mm/swap_state.c | 14 ++++++--------
mm/zswap.c | 8 +-------
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
index 3f85a1c4cfd9..0c25675de977 100644
--- a/mm/swap_state.c
+++ b/mm/swap_state.c
@@ -406,13 +406,17 @@ struct folio *__read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
struct mempolicy *mpol, pgoff_t ilx, bool *new_page_allocated,
bool skip_if_exists)
{
- struct swap_info_struct *si = __swap_entry_to_info(entry);
+ struct swap_info_struct *si;
struct folio *folio;
struct folio *new_folio = NULL;
struct folio *result = NULL;
void *shadow = NULL;
*new_page_allocated = false;
+ si = get_swap_device(entry);
+ if (!si)
+ return NULL;
+
for (;;) {
int err;
@@ -499,6 +503,7 @@ struct folio *__read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
put_swap_folio(new_folio, entry);
folio_unlock(new_folio);
put_and_return:
+ put_swap_device(si);
if (!(*new_page_allocated) && new_folio)
folio_put(new_folio);
return result;
@@ -518,16 +523,11 @@ struct folio *read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
struct swap_iocb **plug)
{
- struct swap_info_struct *si;
bool page_allocated;
struct mempolicy *mpol;
pgoff_t ilx;
struct folio *folio;
- si = get_swap_device(entry);
- if (!si)
- return NULL;
-
mpol = get_vma_policy(vma, addr, 0, &ilx);
folio = __read_swap_cache_async(entry, gfp_mask, mpol, ilx,
&page_allocated, false);
@@ -535,8 +535,6 @@ struct folio *read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
if (page_allocated)
swap_read_folio(folio, plug);
-
- put_swap_device(si);
return folio;
}
diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
index 5d0f8b13a958..aefe71fd160c 100644
--- a/mm/zswap.c
+++ b/mm/zswap.c
@@ -1005,18 +1005,12 @@ static int zswap_writeback_entry(struct zswap_entry *entry,
struct folio *folio;
struct mempolicy *mpol;
bool folio_was_allocated;
- struct swap_info_struct *si;
int ret = 0;
/* try to allocate swap cache folio */
- si = get_swap_device(swpentry);
- if (!si)
- return -EEXIST;
-
mpol = get_task_policy(current);
folio = __read_swap_cache_async(swpentry, GFP_KERNEL, mpol,
- NO_INTERLEAVE_INDEX, &folio_was_allocated, true);
- put_swap_device(si);
+ NO_INTERLEAVE_INDEX, &folio_was_allocated, true);
if (!folio)
return -ENOMEM;
---
base-commit: 02dafa01ec9a00c3758c1c6478d82fe601f5f1ba
change-id: 20251109-revert-78524b05f1a3-04a1295bef8a
Best regards,
--
Kairui Song <kasong(a)tencent.com>