Legitimate Cryp to Recovery Services in 2026
OPTIMISTIC HACKER GAIUS is a trusted firm specializing in the recovery of lost or stolen funds. They assist individuals and businesses affected by scams, fraud, and unauthorized transactions, including cry pto currency theft. Using advanced digital forensics and investigative techniques, our experts work to trace and recover assets. We are committed to confidentiality, transparency, and delivering reliable solutions that help clients regain financial security and peace of mind. Contact information below
Website: optimistichackargaius .c o m
Mail-Box: support @ optimistichackargaius .c omÂ
whatsapp: +44 (73 7) 674 . 0569
Telegram: t. me/OPTIMISTICHACKERGAIUSS
Legitimate Cryp to Recovery Services in 2026
OPTIMISTIC HACKER GAIUS is a trusted firm specializing in the recovery of lost or stolen funds. They assist individuals and businesses affected by scams, fraud, and unauthorized transactions, including cryptocurrency theft. Using advanced digital forensics and investigative techniques, our experts work to trace and recover assets. We are committed to confidentiality, transparency, and delivering reliable solutions that help clients regain financial security and peace of mind. Contact information below
Website: optimistichackargaius .c o m
Mail- B ox: support @ optimistichackargaius .c omÂ
whatsa pp: + 44 (7 37) 674 0 569
Telegram: t . me /OPTIMISTICHACKERGAIUSS
Legitimate Cry .pto Recovery Services in 2026
OPTIMISTIC H AC K E R GAIUS is a trusted firm specializing in the recovery of lost or stolen funds. They assist individuals and businesses affected by scams, fraud, and unauthorized transactions, including cryptocurrency theft. Using advanced digital forensics and investigative techniques, our experts work to trace and recover assets. We are committed to confidentiality, transparency, and delivering reliable solutions that help clients regain financial security and peace of mind. Contact information below
Website: optimisti chackarg aius .c o m
Mail-B ox: support @ optimistic hackargai us .c omÂ
whatsa pp: +44 (737) 674 0569
Telegram: t . me / OPTIMISTICHACKERGAIUSS
I am writing to express my deepest gratitude to FUNDS RECLAIMER COMPANY for their invaluable assistance in recovering my Bitcoin, which was unfortunately lost to a scammer. The expertise and professionalism displayed by their team were instrumental in retrieving my stolen funds, and I am truly thankful for their support throughout this ordeal. After falling victim to a sophisticated scam, I thought all hope was lost, and my Bitcoin was gone for good. However, I decided to reach out to FUNDS RECLAIMER COMPANY, and their team promptly responded with a clear plan of action to recover my stolen funds. Their dedication and expertise in navigating the complexities of cryptocurrency transactions were impressive, and they worked tirelessly to track down the scammer and retrieve my Bitcoin. The entire process, from initial consultation to the final recovery of my funds, was handled with utmost care and transparency. The team at FUNDS RECLAIMER COMPANY kept me informed every step of the way, providing regular updates on the progress of the recovery efforts. Their commitment to customer satisfaction was evident in the way they handled my case, and I was constantly reassured that my case was being treated with the utmost importance. I am thrilled to have my Bitcoin back, and I attribute this success entirely to the exceptional work of FUNDS RECLAIMER COMPANY. Their knowledge and experience in dealing with cryptocurrency scams are unparalleled, and I would highly recommend their services to anyone who has fallen victim to similar situations. The company's expertise and professionalism are a beacon of hope for those who have lost their funds to scammers, and I am living proof of their ability to deliver results. In conclusion, I would like to extend my sincerest appreciation to FUNDS RECLAIMER COMPANY for their outstanding service and support. Their expertise and dedication have given me a second chance to recover my lost Bitcoin, and I will be forever grateful for their help. If you or someone you know has been a victim of a cryptocurrency scam, I strongly recommend reaching out to FUNDS RECLAIMER COMPANY for assistance. They are truly the experts in recovering lost funds, and their professionalism and transparency make them a trusted partner in the fight against scammers.
Info Below:
Website: https//:funds-reclaimercompany.org
Email: fundsreclaimer(a)consultant.com
The first two commits fix rare bugs and should be backported to stable
branches.
The rest is an attempt to cleanup and document the code to make it
a bit easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: Alessio Belle <alessio.belle(a)imgtec.com>
---
Alessio Belle (8):
drm/imagination: Count paired job fence as dependency in prepare_job()
drm/imagination: Fit paired fragment job in the correct CCCB
drm/imagination: Skip check on paired job fence during job submission
drm/imagination: Rename pvr_queue_fence_is_ufo_backed() to reflect usage
drm/imagination: Rename fence returned by pvr_queue_job_arm()
drm/imagination: Move repeated job fence check to its own function
drm/imagination: Update check to skip prepare_job() for fragment jobs
drm/imagination: Minor improvements to job submission code documentation
drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_job.c | 8 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_queue.c | 154 +++++++++++++--------
drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_queue.h | 2 +-
.../gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_rogue_fwif_shared.h | 10 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_sync.c | 8 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_sync.h | 2 +-
6 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 3bce3fdd1ff2ba242f76ab66659fff27207299f1
change-id: 20260330-job-submission-fixes-cleanup-83e01196c3e9
Best regards,
--
Alessio Belle <alessio.belle(a)imgtec.com>
Hi all,
This series is based on previous RFCs/discussions:
Tech topic: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20250918214425.2677057-1-amastro@fb.com/
RFCv1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260226202211.929005-1-mattev@meta.com/
RFCv2: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20260312184613.3710705-1-mattev@meta.com/
The background/rationale is covered in more detail in the RFC cover
letters. The TL;DR is:
The goal is to enable userspace driver designs that use VFIO to export
DMABUFs representing subsets of PCI device BARs, and "vend" those
buffers from a primary process to other subordinate processes by fd.
These processes then mmap() the buffers and their access to the device
is isolated to the exported ranges. This is an improvement on sharing
the VFIO device fd to subordinate processes, which would allow
unfettered access .
This is achieved by enabling mmap() of vfio-pci DMABUFs. Second, a
new ioctl()-based revocation mechanism is added to allow the primary
process to forcibly revoke access to previously-shared BAR spans, even
if the subordinate processes haven't cleanly exited.
(The related topic of safe delegation of iommufd control to the
subordinate processes is not addressed here, and is follow-up work.)
As well as isolation and revocation, another advantage to accessing a
BAR through a VMA backed by a DMABUF is that it's straightforward to
create the buffer with access attributes, such as write-combining.
Notes on patches
================
Feedback from the RFCs requested that, instead of creating
DMABUF-specific vm_ops and .fault paths, to go the whole way and
migrate the existing VFIO PCI BAR mmap() to be backed by a DMABUF too,
resulting in a common vm_ops and fault handler for mmap()s of both the
VFIO device and explicitly-exported DMABUFs. This has been done for
vfio-pci, but not sub-drivers (nvgrace-gpu's special-case mappings are
unchanged).
vfio/pci: Fix vfio_pci_dma_buf_cleanup() double-put
A bug fix to a related are, whose context is a depdency for later
patches.
vfio/pci: Add a helper to look up PFNs for DMABUFs
vfio/pci: Add a helper to create a DMABUF for a BAR-map VMA
The first is for a DMABUF VMA fault handler to determine
arbitrary-sized PFNs from ranges in DMABUF. Secondly, refactor
DMABUF export for use by the existing export feature and a new
helper that creates a DMABUF corresponding to a VFIO BAR mmap()
request.
vfio/pci: Convert BAR mmap() to use a DMABUF
The vfio-pci core mmap() creates a DMABUF with the helper, and the
vm_ops fault handler uses the other helper to resolve the fault.
Because this depends on DMABUF structs/code, CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_CORE
needs to depend on CONFIG_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER. The
CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_DMABUF still conditionally enables the export
support code.
NOTE: The user mmap()s a device fd, but the resulting VMA's vm_file
becomes that of the DMABUF which takes ownership of the device and
puts it on release. This maintains the existing behaviour of a VMA
keeping the VFIO device open.
BAR zapping then happens via the existing vfio_pci_dma_buf_move()
path, which now needs to unmap PTEs in the DMABUF's address_space.
vfio/pci: Provide a user-facing name for BAR mappings
There was a request for decent debug naming in /proc/<pid>/maps
etc. comparable to the existing VFIO names: since the VMAs are
DMABUFs, they have a "dmabuf:" prefix and can't be 100% identical
to before. This is a user-visible change, but this patch at least
now gives us extra info on the BDF & BAR being mapped.
vfio/pci: Clean up BAR zap and revocation
In general (see NOTE!) the vfio_pci_zap_bars() is now obsolete,
since it unmaps PTEs in the VFIO device address_space which is now
unused. This consolidates all calls (e.g. around reset) with the
neighbouring vfio_pci_dma_buf_move()s into new functions, to
revoke-zap/unrevoke.
NOTE: the nvgrace-gpu driver continues to use its own private
vm_ops, fault handler, etc. for its special memregions, and these
DO still add PTEs to the VFIO device address_space. So, a
temporary flag, vdev->bar_needs_zap, maintains the old behaviour
for this use. At least this patch's consolidation makes it easy
to remove the remaining zap when this need goes away.
A FIXME is added: if nvgrace-gpu is converted to DMABUFs, remove
the flag and final zap.
vfio/pci: Support mmap() of a VFIO DMABUF
Adds mmap() for a DMABUF fd exported from vfio-pci.
It was a goal to keep the VFIO device fd lifetime behaviour
unchanged with respect to the DMABUFs. An application can close
all device fds, and this will revoke/clean up all DMABUFs; no
mappings or other access can be performed now. When enabling
mmap() of the DMABUFs, this means access through the VMA is also
revoked. This complicates the fault handler because whilst the
DMABUF exists, it has no guarantee that the corresponding VFIO
device is still alive. Adds synchronisation ensuring the vdev is
available before vdev->memory_lock is touched.
(I decided against the alternative of preventing cleanup by holding
the VFIO device open if any DMABUFs exist, because it's both a
change of behaviour and less clean overall.)
I've added a chonky comment in place, happy to clarify more if you
have ideas.
vfio/pci: Permanently revoke a DMABUF on request
By weight, this is mostly a rename of revoked to an enum, status.
There are now 3 states for a buffer, usable and revoked
temporary/permanent. A new VFIO device ioctl is added,
VFIO_DEVICE_PCI_DMABUF_REVOKE, which passes a DMABUF (exported from
that device) and permanently revokes it. Thus a userspace driver
can guarantee any downstream consumers of a shared fd are prevented
from accessing a BAR range, and that range can be reused.
The code doing revocation in vfio_pci_dma_buf_move() is moved,
unchanged, to a common function for use by _move() and the new
ioctl path.
Q: I can't think of a good reason to temporarily revoke/unrevoke
buffers from userspace, so didn't add a 'flags' field to the ioctl
struct. Easy to add if people think it's worthwhile for future
use.
vfio/pci: Add mmap() attributes to DMABUF feature
Reserves bits [31:28] in vfio_device_feature_dma_buf to allow a
(CPU) mapping attribute to be specified for an exported set of
ranges. The default is the current UC, and a new flag can specify
CPU access as WC.
Q: I've taken 4 bits; the intention is for this field to be a
scalar not a bitmap (i.e. mutually-exclusive access properties).
Perhaps 4 is a bit too many?
Testing
=======
(The [RFC ONLY] userspace test program, for QEMU edu-plus, has been
dropped, but can be found in the GitHub branch below.)
This code has been tested in mapping DMABUFs of single/multiple
ranges, aliasing mmap()s, aliasing ranges across DMABUFs, vm_pgoff >
0, revocation, shutdown/cleanup scenarios, and hugepage mappings seem
to work correctly. I've lightly tested WC mappings also (by observing
resulting PTEs as having the correct attributes...). No regressions
observed on the VFIO selftests, or on our internal vfio-pci
applications.
End
===
This is based on -next (next-20260414 but will merge earlier), as it
depends on Leon's series "vfio: Wait for dma-buf invalidation to
complete":
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20260205-nocturnal-poetic-chamois-f566a…
These commits are on GitHub, along with "[RFC ONLY] selftests: vfio: Add
standalone vfio_dmabuf_mmap_test":
https://github.com/metamev/linux/compare/next-20260414...metamev:linux:dev/…
Thanks for reading,
Matt
================================================================================
Change log:
v1:
- Cleanup of the common DMABUF-aware VMA vm_ops fault handler and
export code.
- Fixed a lot of races, particularly faults racing with DMABUF
cleanup (if the VFIO device fds close, for example).
- Added nicer human-readable names for VFIO mmap() VMAs
RFCv2: Respin based on the feedback/suggestions:
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20260312184613.3710705-1-mattev@meta.com/
- Transform the existing VFIO BAR mmap path to also use DMABUFs
behind the scenes, and then simply share that code for
explicitly-mapped DMABUFs. Jason wanted to go that direction to
enable iommufd VFIO type 1 emulation to pick up a DMABUF for an IO
mapping.
- Revoke buffers using a VFIO device fd ioctl
RFCv1:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260226202211.929005-1-mattev@meta.com/
Matt Evans (9):
vfio/pci: Fix vfio_pci_dma_buf_cleanup() double-put
vfio/pci: Add a helper to look up PFNs for DMABUFs
vfio/pci: Add a helper to create a DMABUF for a BAR-map VMA
vfio/pci: Convert BAR mmap() to use a DMABUF
vfio/pci: Provide a user-facing name for BAR mappings
vfio/pci: Clean up BAR zap and revocation
vfio/pci: Support mmap() of a VFIO DMABUF
vfio/pci: Permanently revoke a DMABUF on request
vfio/pci: Add mmap() attributes to DMABUF feature
drivers/vfio/pci/Kconfig | 3 +-
drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile | 3 +-
drivers/vfio/pci/nvgrace-gpu/main.c | 5 +
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c | 30 +-
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c | 224 ++++++++++---
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c | 500 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_priv.h | 49 ++-
include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h | 1 +
include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 42 ++-
9 files changed, 690 insertions(+), 167 deletions(-)
--
2.47.3
Using kunit to write tests for new work on dmabuf is coming up:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/26-v1-b5cab63049c0+191af-dmabuf_map_type_jgg@nv…
Replace the custom test framework with kunit to avoid maintaining two
concurrent test frameworks.
The conversion minimizes code changes and uses simple pattern-oriented
reworks to reduce the chance of breaking any tests. Aside from adding the
kunit_test_suite() boilerplate, the conversion follows a number of
patterns:
Test failures without cleanup. For example:
if (!ptr)
return -ENOMEM;
Becomes:
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, ptr);
In kunit ASSERT longjumps out of the test.
Check for error, fail and cleanup:
if (err) {
pr_err("msg\n");
goto cleanup;
}
Becomes:
if (err) {
KUNIT_FAIL(test, "msg");
goto cleanup;
}
Preserve the existing failure messages and cleanup code.
Cases where the test returns err but prints no message:
if (err)
goto cleanup;
Becomes:
if (err) {
KUNIT_FAIL(test, "msg");
goto cleanup;
}
Use KUNIT_FAIL to retain the 'cleanup on err' behavior.
Overall, the conversion is straightforward.
The result can be run with kunit.py:
$ tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --build_dir build_kunit_x86_64 --arch x86_64 --kunitconfig ./drivers/dma-buf/.kunitconfig
[20:37:23] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[20:37:23] Building KUnit Kernel ...
Populating config with:
$ make ARCH=x86_64 O=build_kunit_x86_64 olddefconfig
Building with:
$ make all compile_commands.json scripts_gdb ARCH=x86_64 O=build_kunit_x86_64 --jobs=20
[20:37:29] Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
[20:37:29] ============================================================
Running tests with:
$ qemu-system-x86_64 -nodefaults -m 1024 -kernel build_kunit_x86_64/arch/x86/boot/bzImage -append 'kunit.enable=1 console=ttyS0 kunit_shutdown=reboot' -no-reboot -nographic -accel kvm -accel hvf -accel tcg -serial stdio -bios qboot.rom
[20:37:30] ================ dma-buf-resv (5 subtests) =================
[20:37:30] [PASSED] test_sanitycheck
[20:37:30] ===================== test_signaling ======================
[20:37:30] [PASSED] kernel
[20:37:30] [PASSED] write
[20:37:30] [PASSED] read
[20:37:30] [PASSED] bookkeep
[20:37:30] ================= [PASSED] test_signaling ==================
...
[20:37:35] Testing complete. Ran 50 tests: passed: 49, skipped: 1
[20:37:35] Elapsed time: 12.635s total, 0.001s configuring, 6.551s building, 6.017s running
One test that requires two CPUs is skipped since the default VM has a
single CPU and cannot run the test.
All other usual ways to run kunit work as well, and all tests are placed
in a module to provide more options for how they are run.
AI was used to do the large scale semantic search and replaces described
above, then everything was hand checked. AI also deduced the issue with
test_race_signal_callback() in a couple of seconds from the kunit
crash (!!), again was hand checked though I am not so familiar with this
test to be fully certain this is the best answer.
Jason Gunthorpe (5):
dma-buf: Change st-dma-resv.c to use kunit
dma-buf: Change st-dma-fence.c to use kunit
dma-buf: Change st-dma-fence-unwrap.c to use kunit
dma-buf: Change st-dma-fence-chain.c to use kunit
dma-buf: Remove the old selftest
drivers/dma-buf/.kunitconfig | 2 +
drivers/dma-buf/Kconfig | 11 +-
drivers/dma-buf/Makefile | 5 +-
drivers/dma-buf/selftest.c | 167 ---------------
drivers/dma-buf/selftest.h | 30 ---
drivers/dma-buf/selftests.h | 16 --
drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-chain.c | 217 +++++++++----------
drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c | 290 +++++++++++---------------
drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence.c | 200 ++++++++----------
drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-resv.c | 145 +++++++------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig.debug | 2 +-
11 files changed, 394 insertions(+), 691 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/dma-buf/.kunitconfig
delete mode 100644 drivers/dma-buf/selftest.c
delete mode 100644 drivers/dma-buf/selftest.h
delete mode 100644 drivers/dma-buf/selftests.h
base-commit: 41dae5ac5e157b0bb260f381eb3df2f4a4610205
--
2.43.0
From: Vladimir Popov <popov.nkv(a)gmail.com>
If vmw_execbuf_fence_commands() call fails in
vmw_kms_helper_validation_finish(), it sets *p_fence = NULL. If
ctx->bo_list is not empty, the caller, vmw_kms_helper_validation_finish(),
passes the fence through a chain of functions to dma_fence_is_array(),
which causes a NULL pointer dereference in dma_fence_is_array():
vmw_kms_helper_validation_finish() // pass NULL fence
vmw_validation_done()
vmw_validation_bo_fence()
ttm_eu_fence_buffer_objects() // pass NULL fence
dma_resv_add_fence()
dma_fence_is_container()
dma_fence_is_array() // NULL deref
Fix this by adding a NULL check in vmw_validation_bo_fence(): if the fence
is NULL, fall back to ttm_eu_backoff_reservation()to safely release
the buffer object reservations without attempting to add a NULL fence to
dma_resv. This is safe because when fence is NULL, vmw_fallback_wait()
has already been called inside vmw_execbuf_fence_commands() to synchronize
the GPU.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: 038ecc503236 ("drm/vmwgfx: Add a validation module v2")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Popov <popov.nkv(a)gmail.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_validation.h | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_validation.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_validation.h
index 353d837907d8..fc04555ca505 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_validation.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_validation.h
@@ -127,16 +127,23 @@ vmw_validation_bo_reserve(struct vmw_validation_context *ctx,
* vmw_validation_bo_fence - Unreserve and fence buffer objects registered
* with a validation context
* @ctx: The validation context
+ * @fence: Fence with which to fence all buffer objects taking part in the
+ * command submission.
*
* This function unreserves the buffer objects previously reserved using
- * vmw_validation_bo_reserve, and fences them with a fence object.
+ * vmw_validation_bo_reserve, and fences them with a fence object if the
+ * given fence object is not NULL.
*/
static inline void
vmw_validation_bo_fence(struct vmw_validation_context *ctx,
struct vmw_fence_obj *fence)
{
- ttm_eu_fence_buffer_objects(&ctx->ticket, &ctx->bo_list,
- (void *) fence);
+ /* fence is able to be NULL if vmw_execbuf_fence_commands() fails */
+ if (fence)
+ ttm_eu_fence_buffer_objects(&ctx->ticket, &ctx->bo_list,
+ (void *)fence);
+ else
+ ttm_eu_backoff_reservation(&ctx->ticket, &ctx->bo_list);
}
/**
--
2.43.0
How Can I Recover My Lost Cryptocurrency, Hire Ghost Mystery Recovery Hacker
Ghost Mystery Recovery Hacker delivered an excellent experience when I needed help recovering something I thought was permanently lost. From the start, their communication was clear, professional, and reassuring, which immediately made me feel more confident about the process. They took the time to understand my situation and explained each step in a way that was honest and easy to follow.
What stood out most was their consistency and dedication. I was kept informed throughout, and they remained patient and responsive whenever I had questions. Their expertise was evident in the way they handled everything carefully and efficiently, without creating false expectations.The outcome exceeded what I had hoped for. They were able to successfully resolve my issue, which brought me a great sense of relief. It’s not often you come across a service that combines professionalism, transparency, and results so well.
I would strongly recommend Ghost Mystery Recovery Hacker to anyone looking for reliable recovery support. Their commitment to helping clients and delivering real results truly sets them apart.
Email address: support@ ghostmysteryrecovery. c om
WhatsApp on (+44) 7480 061765
Website; ghostmysteryrecovery. c om
How Can I Recover My Lost Cryptocurrency, Hire Ghost Mystery Recovery Hacker
Ghost Mystery Recovery Hacker delivered an excellent experience when I needed help recovering something I thought was permanently lost. From the start, their communication was clear, professional, and reassuring, which immediately made me feel more confident about the process. They took the time to understand my situation and explained each step in a way that was honest and easy to follow.
What stood out most was their consistency and dedication. I was kept informed throughout, and they remained patient and responsive whenever I had questions. Their expertise was evident in the way they handled everything carefully and efficiently, without creating false expectations.The outcome exceeded what I had hoped for. They were able to successfully resolve my issue, which brought me a great sense of relief. It’s not often you come across a service that combines professionalism, transparency, and results so well.
I would strongly recommend Ghost Mystery Recovery Hacker to anyone looking for reliable recovery support. Their commitment to helping clients and delivering real results truly sets them apart.
Email address: support@ ghostmysteryrecovery. c om
WhatsApp on (+44) 7480 061765
Website; ghostmysteryrecovery. c om