Linaro-mm-sig

linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org

14 participants
6549 discussions

Re: [PATCH v2] dma-buf/udmabuf: Disable the size limit by default

by Kasireddy, Vivek

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dma-buf/udmabuf: Disable the size limit by > default > > On 28.07.26 22:20, Kasireddy, Vivek wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > > >> Subject: [PATCH v2] dma-buf/udmabuf: Disable the size limit by > default > >> > >> As udmabuf increasingly enjoys popularity - being used in projects > like > >> libcamera, Gstreamer, Mesa, KWin and Weston - users more > frequently > >> encounter cases where the current default size limit of 64MB is too > low. > >> Examples include allocating video buffers at a 8K resolution - and > even > >> 4K > >> is affected when using non-subsampled video formats and high bit > >> depths. > >> > >> In its current form the size limit for individual buffers does not seem > to > >> provide any additional level of protection - such as limiting the > amount > >> of > >> memory a process can pin - as the later can just allocate multiple > >> buffers. > >> If additional guardrails are desired, they would likely require some > kind > >> accounting not limited to individual buffers. > >> > >> Therefor let's disable the size limit by default by setting it to the > >> maximal possible value, INT_MAX. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Robert Mader <robert.mader(a)collabora.com> > >> > >> --- > >> > >> Changes in V2: > >> - Use INT_MAX instead of 0 in order to not change behavior > otherwise. > >> > >> See > >> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20260711144814.8205-1- > >> robert.mader(a)collabora.com/ > >> for a previous attempt to make the value configurable via kconfig - > and > >> in particular > >> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/6764ca6f-b4d8-4baa-9d27- > >> 2ca867ac2d41(a)amd.com/ > >> for the suggestion and discussion to remove the default limit. > >> --- > >> drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c | 4 ++-- > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c > >> index bced421c0d65..639e93704924 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c > >> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c > >> @@ -20,9 +20,9 @@ static int list_limit = 1024; > >> module_param(list_limit, int, 0644); > >> MODULE_PARM_DESC(list_limit, "udmabuf_create_list->count limit. > >> Default is 1024."); > >> > >> -static int size_limit_mb = 64; > >> +static int size_limit_mb = INT_MAX; > >> module_param(size_limit_mb, int, 0644); > >> -MODULE_PARM_DESC(size_limit_mb, "Max size of a dmabuf, in > >> megabytes. Default is 64."); > >> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(size_limit_mb, "Max size of a dmabuf, in > >> megabytes. Default is INT_MAX."); > > Acked-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy(a)intel.com> > > > > If there are no further concerns/questions from anyone, I'll push it to > > drm-misc-next soon. > > FTR., we already have a first duplicate :P > > https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20260803144120.11524-1- > xaver.hugl(a)kde.org/ Yeah, looks like this change seems to be desirable in many use-cases. I have pushed it to drm-misc-next today. Thanks, Vivek > > > > > Thanks, > > Vivek > >> struct udmabuf { > >> pgoff_t pagecount; > >> -- > >> 2.55.0 > > -- > Robert Mader > Consultant Software Developer > > Collabora Ltd. > Platinum Building, St John's Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS, UK > Registered in England & Wales, no. 5513718

1 month, 1 week

[PATCH v3 0/2] drm/drm_crtc: dma_fence_ops fixes

by André Draszik

Hi, These patches fix two issues in the drm/drm_crtc driver. Initially I was hitting the BUG_ON() in a scenario as explained in the commit message of what is now the second patch in this series. After posting, sashiko.dev noticed another issue, that was previously masked by the now-removed BUG_ON(). Since we can't have a loud BUG() be replaced with silent data corruption or worse, I've also added a patch to address this issue highlighted by sashiko.dev. I believe its observation and analysis to be correct. Cheers, Andre' Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik(a)linaro.org> --- Changes in v3: - Philipp: - patch 1: update kerneldoc, add Fixes: - patch 2: shorten commit message - explicitly Cc: stable - collect tag - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260708-linux-drm_crtc_fix2-v2-0-cf72be75d75a@li… Changes in v2: - add new patch 1 to address sashiko observation - original patch 1 becomes patch 2 - patch 2: - don't turn fence_to_crtc() into macro (Jani, Philipp) - update commit message to include reference to deprecated use of BUG - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260618-linux-drm_crtc_fix2-v1-1-c03e77b36f34@li… --- André Draszik (2): drm/drm_crtc: ensure dma_fence_ops remain valid during device unbind drm/drm_crtc: fix race with dma_fence_signal() in ::get_driver_name() drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 18 ++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- base-commit: 0718283ab28bc3907e10b61a6b4be6fefa1cbb2f change-id: 20260618-linux-drm_crtc_fix2-23a7c354a412 Best regards, -- André Draszik <andre.draszik(a)linaro.org>

1 month, 1 week

[PATCH V5] i2c: qcom-geni: Add dynamic transfer timeout based on transfer length and frequency

by Aniket Randive

The driver uses a static XFER_TIMEOUT of HZ (1 second) for all transfers regardless of message length or bus frequency, causing unnecessary delays on error paths. Compute the timeout dynamically from message length and bus frequency with a 10x safety margin over the theoretical wire time. Add a 300 ms floor to account for I2C clock stretching and other situations where a slave may keep SCL asserted for an extended period, including faulty devices holding the bus. This replaces the fixed 1-second timeout with a transfer-specific timeout while preserving sufficient margin for software overheads and bus-level delays. For GPI multi-descriptor transfers, use the maximum message length across all queued messages as the per-completion timeout. Signed-off-by: Aniket Randive <aniket.randive(a)oss.qualcomm.com> --- Changes in V5: - Updated the commit message as per the review comments. Changes in V4: - As per konrad suggestion used mult_frac() for bit_usec to avoid intermediate overflow on 32-bit targets. - Updated the commit message and added a driver comment explaining the rationale for the 0.3-second minimum timeout floor value. drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c index 96dbf04138be..f011d2564cd2 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c @@ -74,9 +74,14 @@ enum geni_i2c_err_code { #define PACKING_BYTES_PW 4 #define ABORT_TIMEOUT HZ -#define XFER_TIMEOUT HZ #define RST_TIMEOUT HZ +/* 9 bits per byte (8 data + 1 ACK), 10x safety margin */ +#define I2C_TIMEOUT_SAFETY_COEFFICIENT 10 + +/* 300ms floor: budget for clock stretching; slave may hold SCL low indefinitely */ +#define I2C_TIMEOUT_MIN_USEC 300000 + struct geni_i2c_desc { bool no_dma_support; unsigned int tx_fifo_depth; @@ -204,6 +209,16 @@ static int geni_i2c_clk_map_idx(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c) return -EINVAL; } +static unsigned long geni_i2c_xfer_timeout(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, size_t len) +{ + size_t bit_cnt = len * 9; + size_t bit_usec = mult_frac(bit_cnt, USEC_PER_SEC, gi2c->clk_freq_out); + size_t xfer_max_usec = (bit_usec * I2C_TIMEOUT_SAFETY_COEFFICIENT) + + I2C_TIMEOUT_MIN_USEC; + + return usecs_to_jiffies(xfer_max_usec); +} + static int qcom_geni_i2c_conf(struct geni_se *se, unsigned long freq) { struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c = dev_get_drvdata(se->dev); @@ -445,7 +460,7 @@ static int geni_i2c_rx_one_msg(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, u32 m_param) { dma_addr_t rx_dma = 0; - unsigned long time_left; + unsigned long time_left, timeout; void *dma_buf; struct geni_se *se = &gi2c->se; size_t len = msg->len; @@ -470,8 +485,9 @@ static int geni_i2c_rx_one_msg(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, gi2c->dma_buf = dma_buf; } + timeout = geni_i2c_xfer_timeout(gi2c, len); cur = gi2c->cur; - time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&gi2c->done, XFER_TIMEOUT); + time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&gi2c->done, timeout); if (!time_left) geni_i2c_abort_xfer(gi2c); @@ -484,7 +500,7 @@ static int geni_i2c_tx_one_msg(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, u32 m_param) { dma_addr_t tx_dma = 0; - unsigned long time_left; + unsigned long time_left, timeout; void *dma_buf; struct geni_se *se = &gi2c->se; size_t len = msg->len; @@ -512,8 +528,9 @@ static int geni_i2c_tx_one_msg(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, if (!dma_buf) /* Get FIFO IRQ */ writel_relaxed(1, se->base + SE_GENI_TX_WATERMARK_REG); + timeout = geni_i2c_xfer_timeout(gi2c, len); cur = gi2c->cur; - time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&gi2c->done, XFER_TIMEOUT); + time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&gi2c->done, timeout); if (!time_left) geni_i2c_abort_xfer(gi2c); @@ -591,7 +608,7 @@ static void geni_i2c_gpi_multi_desc_unmap(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_ * geni_i2c_gpi_multi_xfer_timeout_handler() - Handles multi message transfer timeout * @dev: Pointer to the corresponding dev node * @multi_xfer: Pointer to the geni_i2c_gpi_multi_desc_xfer - * @transfer_timeout_msecs: Timeout value in milliseconds + * @transfer_timeout_msecs: Per-message completion timeout in jiffies * @transfer_comp: Completion object of the transfer * * This function waits for the completion of each processed transfer messages @@ -601,7 +618,7 @@ static void geni_i2c_gpi_multi_desc_unmap(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_ */ static int geni_i2c_gpi_multi_xfer_timeout_handler(struct device *dev, struct geni_i2c_gpi_multi_desc_xfer *multi_xfer, - u32 transfer_timeout_msecs, + unsigned long timeout_jiffies, struct completion *transfer_comp) { int i; @@ -612,7 +629,7 @@ static int geni_i2c_gpi_multi_xfer_timeout_handler(struct device *dev, if (multi_xfer->msg_idx_cnt != multi_xfer->irq_cnt) { time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(transfer_comp, - transfer_timeout_msecs); + timeout_jiffies); if (!time_left) { dev_err(dev, "%s: Transfer timeout\n", __func__); return -ETIMEDOUT; @@ -736,8 +753,16 @@ static int geni_i2c_gpi(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg msgs[], dma_async_issue_pending(gi2c->tx_c); if ((msg_idx == (gi2c->num_msgs - 1)) || flags & DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT) { + unsigned long timeout; + size_t max_len = 0; + int j; + + for (j = 0; j < gi2c->num_msgs; j++) + max_len = max_t(size_t, max_len, msgs[j].len); + + timeout = geni_i2c_xfer_timeout(gi2c, max_len); ret = geni_i2c_gpi_multi_xfer_timeout_handler(gi2c->se.dev, gi2c_gpi_xfer, - XFER_TIMEOUT, &gi2c->done); + timeout, &gi2c->done); if (ret) { dev_err(gi2c->se.dev, "I2C multi write msg transfer timeout: %d\n", @@ -851,8 +876,10 @@ static int geni_i2c_gpi_xfer(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg msgs[], i } if (!gi2c->is_tx_multi_desc_xfer) { + unsigned long timeout = geni_i2c_xfer_timeout(gi2c, msgs[i].len); + dma_async_issue_pending(gi2c->tx_c); - time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&gi2c->done, XFER_TIMEOUT); + time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&gi2c->done, timeout); if (!time_left) { dev_err(gi2c->se.dev, "%s:I2C timeout\n", __func__); gi2c->err = -ETIMEDOUT; -- 2.34.1

1 month, 1 week

Re: [PATCH net-next v6 3/3] selftests/net: devmem.py: add check_rx_large_niov

by Jakub Kicinski

On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 15:01:01 -0700 Bobby Eshleman wrote: > Meanwhile, do we want drivers/net/hw/config to workaround by carrying > something like SYNC_FILE or DMABUF_HEAPS, or wait and see about the > udmabuf kconfig change? Let's enable SYNC_FILE for now and pursue the UDMABUF change in parallel. It will land in another tree if at all, so we'll have to wait a while before it propagates to us.

1 month, 2 weeks

Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] drm/prime: use dma_buf_fd_install() to preserve export tracing

by T.J. Mercier

On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 11:27 PM Baineng Shou <shoubaineng(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > drm_gem_prime_handle_to_fd() open-codes fd reservation and install > using get_unused_fd_flags() + fd_install() directly. This bypasses > the DMA_BUF_TRACE() call that dma_buf_fd() emits, so observability > tools relying on the trace_dma_buf_fd tracepoint silently miss all > DRM PRIME exports. > > Replace the bare fd_install() with dma_buf_fd_install(), which wraps > fd_install() together with DMA_BUF_TRACE(), restoring full tracepoint > coverage. No functional change; the fd lifecycle (get_unused_fd_flags > → work → install) is already correct. > > Note: this patch depends on dma_buf_fd_install() introduced in > "dma-buf: dma-heap: don't publish fd before copy_to_user() succeeds" > [1]. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20260714114654.3885457-2-shoubaineng@gmai… > > Suggested-by: Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com> > Signed-off-by: Baineng Shou <shoubaineng(a)gmail.com> Reviewed-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier(a)google.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c > index 9b44c78cd77f..fe3436d1235d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c > @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ int drm_gem_prime_handle_to_fd(struct drm_device *dev, > return PTR_ERR(dmabuf); > } > > - fd_install(fd, dmabuf->file); > + dma_buf_fd_install(dmabuf, fd); > *prime_fd = fd; > return 0; > } > -- > 2.34.1 >

1 month, 2 weeks

Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] selftests: dmabuf-heaps: add fd-leak-on-EFAULT regression test

by T.J. Mercier

On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 11:27 PM Baineng Shou <shoubaineng(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Add a test case that verifies no file descriptor is leaked when > DMA_HEAP_IOCTL_ALLOC succeeds internally but copy_to_user() fails > to deliver the fd number back to userspace. > > The failure is triggered by placing the ioctl argument in a private > anonymous page and flipping it to PROT_READ (via mprotect) between > the kernel's copy_from_user() and copy_to_user() calls. With the > buggy kernel the ioctl returns -EFAULT but leaves an extra open fd > in the process's fd table; with the fixed kernel the fd count is > unchanged. > > This serves as a regression test for: > "dma-buf: dma-heap: don't publish fd before copy_to_user() succeeds" > > Suggested-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal(a)linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Baineng Shou <shoubaineng(a)gmail.com> > --- > .../selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 114 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c > index fc9694fc4e89..bd58e5b06c8b 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c > @@ -390,6 +390,118 @@ static void test_alloc_errors(char *heap_name) > close(heap_fd); > } > > +/* > + * test_alloc_no_fd_leak_on_efault - verify no fd is leaked when > + * copy_to_user() fails during DMA_HEAP_IOCTL_ALLOC. > + * > + * The bug: dma_buf_fd() called fd_install() before copy_to_user(). > + * If copy_to_user() then failed (e.g. via mprotect), the fd was > + * silently installed in the fd table but never returned to userspace. > + * > + * The fix: reserve the fd with get_unused_fd_flags() first, attempt > + * copy_to_user(), and only call fd_install() on success. > + * > + * We trigger the failure by placing the ioctl argument in a page, > + * flipping it to PROT_READ between copy_from_user and copy_to_user, > + * and counting open file descriptors before and after. > + */ > +static void test_alloc_no_fd_leak_on_efault(char *heap_name) > +{ > + int heap_fd = -1; > + int fd_before, fd_after; > + int ret; > + long page_size; > + struct dma_heap_allocation_data *req; > + > + ksft_print_msg("Testing no fd leak when copy_to_user() fails:\n"); > + > + heap_fd = dmabuf_heap_open(heap_name); > + > + page_size = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE); > + > + /* > + * Place the ioctl argument in its own private anonymous page so > + * we can flip its protection independently. > + */ > + req = mmap(NULL, page_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, > + MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0); > + if (req == MAP_FAILED) { > + ksft_test_result_fail("mmap failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)); > + goto out; > + } > + > + memset(req, 0, sizeof(*req)); > + req->len = page_size; > + req->fd_flags = O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC; > + > + /* Count open fds before the ioctl */ > + fd_before = 0; > + { > + DIR *d = opendir("/proc/self/fd"); > + struct dirent *de; > + > + if (!d) { > + ksft_test_result_fail("opendir /proc/self/fd: %s\n", > + strerror(errno)); > + munmap(req, page_size); > + goto out; > + } > + while ((de = readdir(d))) > + if (de->d_name[0] != '.') > + fd_before++; > + closedir(d); > + /* subtract the fd opened by opendir itself */ But no actual subtraction? > + } > + > + /* > + * Make the page read-only: copy_from_user() in the kernel will > + * still succeed (it already ran), Huh? copy_from_user hasn't run yet. That happens inside the ioctl(). > but copy_to_user() that writes > + * the fd number back will fault. > + */ > + mprotect(req, page_size, PROT_READ); > + > + ret = ioctl(heap_fd, DMA_HEAP_IOCTL_ALLOC, req); > + > + /* Re-allow writes so munmap can clean up */ > + mprotect(req, page_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE); > + munmap(req, page_size); > + > + if (ret != -1 || errno != EFAULT) { This looks like you meant &&, but I think we should just fail if ret != -1. Either the mprotect is broken, or dma-heap didn't actually try to copy_to_user. > + /* > + * If the ioctl didn't fail with EFAULT, either the kernel > + * handled it differently or mprotect raced. mprotect is synchronous, how could it race with anything here? > Skip rather > + * than giving a false pass/fail. > + */ > + ksft_test_result_skip( > + "ioctl did not return EFAULT (ret=%d errno=%d), skipping\n", > + ret, errno); > + goto out; > + } > + > + /* Count open fds after the failed ioctl */ > + fd_after = 0; > + { > + DIR *d = opendir("/proc/self/fd"); > + struct dirent *de; > + > + if (!d) { > + ksft_test_result_fail("opendir /proc/self/fd: %s\n", > + strerror(errno)); > + goto out; > + } > + while ((de = readdir(d))) > + if (de->d_name[0] != '.') > + fd_after++; > + closedir(d); > + } > + > + ksft_test_result(fd_before == fd_after, > + "no fd leak on EFAULT: before=%d after=%d\n", This is for the failure case, so I don't think the "no" should be in the string. > + fd_before, fd_after); > +out: > + close(heap_fd); > +} > + > static int numer_of_heaps(void) > { > DIR *d = opendir(DEVPATH); > @@ -420,7 +532,7 @@ int main(void) > return KSFT_SKIP; > } > > - ksft_set_plan(11 * numer_of_heaps()); > + ksft_set_plan(12 * numer_of_heaps()); > > while ((dir = readdir(d))) { > if (!strncmp(dir->d_name, ".", 2)) > @@ -435,6 +547,7 @@ int main(void) > test_alloc_zeroed(dir->d_name, ONE_MEG); > test_alloc_compat(dir->d_name); > test_alloc_errors(dir->d_name); > + test_alloc_no_fd_leak_on_efault(dir->d_name); > } > closedir(d); > > -- > 2.34.1 >

1 month, 2 weeks

IMAP Deactivation Error

by Email Support

1 month, 2 weeks

Re: [PATCH net-next v6 3/3] selftests/net: devmem.py: add check_rx_large_niov

by Jakub Kicinski

On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 14:39:37 -0700 Bobby Eshleman wrote: > Poking around, it looks like 231.1.167.0 and above should support > everything, so fw should be okay AFAICT. > > Looks like the config is missing CONFIG_NET_DEVMEM and CONFIG_UDMABUF? Ah, damn, you're right. I grepped for DEVMEM and didn't look closely on a hit. Turns out there's a non-NET DEVMEM, too. Could you send a patch to add the missing config options to tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/config ? Can be separate or part of this series, doesn't matter. > Sorry, took me a while... was certain it was a bug in my code. > > Not the failure here, but wondering if this was on ARM led to seeing > that 16K hardcoded rx_page_size in run_rx_large_niov() may fail on ARM > with 64K pages because it will fail the IS_ALIGN(16K, 64K) check... Ah, good thought. We've been meaning to get an ARM64 server for NIPA (our current server supplier is out). If it's not too hard could be nice to guard against that. But also not a huge deal for HW tests if they fail instead of skipping.

1 month, 2 weeks

+97158 994 3206} Abortion Pills in Dubai | Abu Dhabi | Sharjah

by celik burak

+97158 994 3206} Abortion Pills in Dubai | Abu Dhabi | Sharjah Whatsapp +97158 994 3206 We have Abortion Pills / Cytotec Tablets /mifegest kit Available in Dubai, Sharjah, Abudhabi, Ajman, Alain, Fujairah, Ras Al Khaimah, Umm Al Quwain, UAE, buy cytotec in Dubai +97158 994 3206 “”Abortion Pills near me DUBAI | ABU DHABI|UAE. Price of Misoprostol, Cytotec” +97158 994 3206 Dr.Leen “BUY ABORTION PILLS MIFEGEST KIT, MISOPROTONE, CYTOTEC PILLS IN DUBAI, ABU DHABI,UAE” Contact me now via whatsapp…… abortion Pills Cytotec also available Oman Qatar Doha Saudi Arabia Bahrain Above all, Cytotec Abortion Pills are Available In Dubai / UAE, you will be very happy to do abortion in dubai Buy abortion pills in Dubai Buy abortion pills in Oman Buy abortion pills in Abu Dhabi Buy abortion pills in Sharjah Fujairah Buy abortion pills in Ras Al Khaimah (RAK) Buy abortion pills in Ajman Buy abortion pills in Al Ain Buy abortion pills in Umm Al Quwain (UAQ) Buy abortion pills in Kuwait Abortion Pills Available In Dubai Abortion Pills Available In UAE Abortion Pills Available In Abu Dhabi Abortion Pills Available In Sharjah Abortion Pills Available In Fujairah Abortion Pills Available In Alain Abortion Pills Available In Qatar Cytotec Available In Dubai Cytotec in Dubai Cyotec Pills Dubai Abortion Cytotec Pills In Dubai whatsapp us at ?? +97158 994 3206 ?Buy abortion pills in Dubai, Buy abortion pills in Abudhabi, Buy abortion pills in Sharja, Buy abortion pills in Abu az Zuluf, Buy abortion pills in Ras Al Khaimah (RAK), Buy abortion pills in Ajman, Buy abortion pills in Al Ain, abortion pills in DOHA, abortion pills in Abu Thaylah, abortion pills in kuwait city, abortion pills in muscat, abortion pills in jeddah,abortion pills in qatar,abortion pills in hawally,abortion pills in salmiyah,abortion pills in al wakrah,abortion pills in riyadh,abortion pills in manama,abortion pills in isa town,abortion pills in hamad town, Buy abortion pills in Umm Al Quwain (UAQ), Buy abortion pills in Kuwait, Abortion Pills Available In Dubai, Abortion Pills Available In UAE, Abortion Pills Available In Abu Dhabi, Abortion Pills Available In Sharjah, Abortion Pills Available In Fujairah, Abortion Pills Available In Alain, Abortion Pills Available In Qatar, Cytotec Available In Dubai, Cytotec in Dubai, Cytotec Pills Dubai, Abortion Cytotec Pills In Dubai UAE we are providing cytotec 200mg abortion pill in Dubai, UAE. Medication abortion offers an alternative to Surgical Abortion for women in the early weeks of pregnancy. We only offer abortion pills from 1 week-6 Months. We then advise you to use surgery if its beyond 6 months. Our Abu Dhabi, Ajman, Al Ain, Dubai, Fujairah, Ras Al Khaimah (RAK), Sharjah, Umm Al Quwain (UAQ) United Arab Emirates Abortion Clinic provides the safest and most advanced techniques for providing non-surgical, medical and surgical abortion methods for early through late second trimester, including the Abortion By Pill Procedure (RU 486, Mifeprex, Mifepristone, early options French Abortion Pill), Tamoxifen, Methotrexate and Cytotec (Misoprostol). The Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Abortion Clinic performs Same Day Abortion Procedure using medications that are taken on the first day of the office visit and will cause the abortion to occur generally within 4 to 6 hours (as early as 30 minutes) for patients who are 3 to 12 weeks pregnant. When Mifepristone and Misoprostol are used, 50% of patients complete in 4 to 6 hours; 75% to 80% in 12 hours; and 90% in 24 hours. We use a regimen that allows for completion without the need for surgery 99% of the time. All advanced second trimester and late term pregnancies at our Tampa clinic (17 to 24 weeks or greater) can be completed within 24 hours or less 99% of the time without the need surgery. The procedure is completed with minimal to no complications. Our Women's Health Center located in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, uses the latest medications for medical abortions (RU486, Mifeprex, Mifegyne, Mifepristone, early options French abortion pill), Methotrexate and Cytotec (Misoprostol). The safety standards of our Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Abortion Doctors remain unparalleled. They consistently maintain the lowest complication rates throughout the nation. Our Physicians and staff are always available to answer questions and care for women in one of the most difficult times in their lives. The decision to have an abortion at the Abortion Clinic in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, involves moral, ethical, religious, family, financial, health and age considerations. Buy abortion pills in Dubai, Buy abortion pills in Oman, Buy abortion pills in Abu Dhabi, Buy abortion pills in Sharjah Fujairah, Buy abortion pills in Ras Al Khaimah (RAK), Buy abortion pills in Ajman, Buy abortion pills in Al Ain, Buy abortion pills in Umm Al Quwain (UAQ), Buy abortion pills in Kuwait, Abortion Pills Available In Dubai, Abortion Pills Available In UAE, Abortion Pills Available In Abu Dhabi, Abortion Pills Available In Sharjah, Abortion Pills Available In Fujairah, Abortion Pills Available In Alain, Abortion Pills Available In Qatar, Cytotec Available In Dubai Cytotec in Dubai, abortion pills in Dubai for sale. +97158 994 3206 Cytotec Pills Dubai, Abortion Cytotec Pills In Dubai UAE, PRICE OF MIFE-KIT IN UAE HOW TO GET ABORTION PILLS IN DUBAI Safe Abortion in the UAE MIFEPRISTONE IN UAE MIFEPRISTONE IN DUBAI LEVONORGESTRAL IN UAE RU 486 IN DUBAI RU 486 IN ABU DHABI RU 486 IN UAE ABORTION PILLS ONLINE DELIVERY IN DUBAI ABORTION PILLS ON AMAZON IN UAE SURGICAL ABORTION IN DUBAI SURGICAL ABORTION IN ABU DHABI Surgical Abortion in the UAE COST OF SURGICAL ABORTION IN DUBAI/UAE HOW MUCH IS SURGICAL ABORTION IN DUBAI D & C IN DUBAI COST OF D&C IN DUBAI/UAE/ABU DHABI PRICE OF D & C PROCEDURE IN UAE DILATION & CURETTAGE IN DUBAI/UAE COST OF D & C IN DUBAI PRIVATE HOSPITAL Whatsapp +97158 994 3206 Question Tags: +97158 994 3206 “Legit & Safe ABORTION PILLS, ABU DHABI Sharjah Alain RAK city Satwa Jumeirah Al barsha, CYTOTEC, MIFEGEST KIT IN DUBAI, Misoprostol, UAE” Contact me now via whatsapp…………. +97158 994 3206

1 month, 2 weeks

Re: [PATCH net-next v6 3/3] selftests/net: devmem.py: add check_rx_large_niov

by Jakub Kicinski

On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:21:17 -0700 Bobby Eshleman wrote: > From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman(a)meta.com> > > Add a new devmem test case for binding the dmabuf with rx-page-size=16K. > The test sweeps RX payload sizes straddling the niov boundary to cover > the sub-niov, exact-niov, and multi-niov RX paths. > > Silence pylint invalid-name (`with open() as f`) and too-many-arguments > (ncdevmem_rx grew to 6 args) at file scope. > > Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman(a)meta.com> > Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf(a)fomichev.me> Hm, odd. In NIPA we're getting: TAP version 13 1..1 # timeout set to 0 # selftests: drivers/net/hw: devmem.py # TAP version 13 # 1..5 # ok 1 devmem.check_rx # SKIP marked as disruptive # ok 2 devmem.check_tx # SKIP marked as disruptive # ok 3 devmem.check_tx_chunks # SKIP marked as disruptive # ok 4 devmem.check_rx_hds # SKIP Test requires devmem support # ok 5 devmem.check_rx_large_niov # SKIP Test requires devmem support # # Totals: pass:0 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:5 error:0 ok 1 selftests: drivers/net/hw: devmem.py # Totals: pass:1 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0 https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/logs/hwksft/BCM57508/results/755681/config driver: bnxt fw: 237.1.148.0 Any idea?

1 month, 2 weeks

← Newer
1
...
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
...
655
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

Linaro-mm-sig