This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3
in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3.
discards 80c9344f onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 5642ab1c onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards c4fe303f onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards beac5f0f onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 39c240db onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards f7d4320c 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 3c773a14 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards cb0dc528 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards b6380dd9 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 7e959f1a 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards de4a995a 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 41315424 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 742d82bf 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...]
discards f2907da6 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...]
discards 951b2e12 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards f5e21f5b 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...]
discards 8a7e4023 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 8ceae474 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards febde160 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 6819e2a9 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 1b9c6470 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards dd0a821b 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards cef86a81 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits
discards f91a86d6 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...]
discards a632c8ee 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits
discards 91f000ce 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 1e358c0d 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 6d9c113c 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards d632cb9c 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 3180d4ad 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 2791d9f1 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits
discards 9de0aa83 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 48d7591a 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 6745d950 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 1f4161a9 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards bfa901c9 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...]
discards 720dd071 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards c055156b 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 3e71b37f 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards ee40b4ab 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 3106b7d6 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards bd4e2603 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...]
discards 1e1fce0f 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...]
discards 9db67a6d 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits
discards 91a7b5ac 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...]
discards 260ce43c 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits
discards 7c41d132 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards fab9b7dd 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards bb4b39f5 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...]
discards ae58c186 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits
discards 45af9811 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...]
discards b1ca42af 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits
discards a02f25e4 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 5010dff4 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards a4170d48 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 8c217e17 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards 258cf078 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards a6f99b12 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards ead4259f 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...]
discards ab392bd2 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits
discards 205d34c3 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...]
discards b399aab1 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 39b31281 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits
discards b642daf8 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 361c822b 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 1a350d52 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...]
new 6fc0c6c4 onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
new 7835c244 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new d7501381 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 6837654b 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits
new 1802f7eb 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 6f6a0c4a 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...]
new 0aaa022a 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits
new e5805381 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...]
new c678902d 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new dcf1beea 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 67699fcc 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new 614af805 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 003e7c3f 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new fbaa41e3 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new fca78420 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits
new 0f714027 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...]
new 6a152f49 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits
new 62ccae6c 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...]
new a48bb50b 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new 44967c9a 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 3b2a9547 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits
new 60e2b794 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...]
new e8efe0ff 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits
new c06d3f39 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...]
new a494e937 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...]
new ed3f8e6d 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 26be6093 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 6c34ac80 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new d8cdc46c 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new e742d202 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new a18ea2be 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...]
new 151cb381 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 7a9761dc 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 46a3bc58 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new ce5406f3 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new b125d97c 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits
new 25450f27 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new b1c31d28 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 95cab61d 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new e821a349 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 26b2ce9f 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new d8bdd7f1 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits
new f5fbec4e 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...]
new 95b85383 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits
new 03ef92c5 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new fc63cacc 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 5536c0ee 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 23bbe299 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 093529c8 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 9a9d15dd 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 8a8832ad 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...]
new 3350d4e0 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 9623cd74 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...]
new a5cc226f 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...]
new 588804d8 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new a1d8ef3e 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new e2b6be8b 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 8601855a 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 436da40b 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new ad3962ea 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new df27c065 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 2aa7e8b7 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 8758489b onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 66630a83 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new d1ea19fe onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 28d53b93 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions.
That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the
branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs
when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository
containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (80c9344f)
\
N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O
revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions
from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still
refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 66 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this
repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions
listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only
been added to this reference.
Summary of changes:
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
the administrator of this repository.
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3
in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3.
discards 37f4a380 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 2b900ee6 onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 36ac4e4c onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards d5794c64 onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 01b6488c onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards b0144268 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards c2f455cd 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 3a93e00d 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 1d8de04a 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 47258483 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards a7461c9f 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 9e89f2c5 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 0aa87ca1 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...]
discards 53adfdf2 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...]
discards 393b66ce 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards e61e0b39 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...]
discards a164cb78 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 632904f0 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 40c784ff 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards a1a7086f 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 91741b0f 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 3f6d0d5f 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards f04b6cb9 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits
discards 293e044e 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...]
discards 56ecdcce 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits
discards 08f1e703 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards b48d6777 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 1baac59e 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards bf133be7 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 5f6b30bf 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 546be5ac 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits
discards 4346c7a4 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 9e202558 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards dcf878d2 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards f88b80d3 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 04d8c419 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...]
discards 6f0f3a56 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards ce060179 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 580401fc 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards fa19be87 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards a19657f5 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards e2f6dc8c 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...]
discards 61fdf27c 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...]
discards fc5516f4 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits
discards 4fc45611 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...]
discards c154427e 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits
discards 2c1c7b9b 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 155c6734 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards 7308dffe 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...]
discards 20c1977d 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits
discards 05129c4e 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...]
discards c22857d1 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits
discards c28d7f35 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 85f166e4 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards 350b0887 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 08020035 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards 30244c74 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards a0e020a9 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 969db399 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...]
discards 690c654f 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits
discards 32683eef 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...]
discards 117bd3ef 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 86ad6b77 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits
discards 87cc3f22 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 79189f0d 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 59edd422 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...]
discards d1f9cfdf 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits
new 299e723e onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
new 1a350d52 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...]
new 361c822b 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new b642daf8 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 39b31281 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits
new b399aab1 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 205d34c3 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...]
new ab392bd2 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits
new ead4259f 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...]
new a6f99b12 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 258cf078 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 8c217e17 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new a4170d48 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 5010dff4 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new a02f25e4 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new b1ca42af 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits
new 45af9811 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...]
new ae58c186 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits
new bb4b39f5 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...]
new fab9b7dd 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new 7c41d132 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 260ce43c 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits
new 91a7b5ac 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...]
new 9db67a6d 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits
new 1e1fce0f 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...]
new bd4e2603 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...]
new 3106b7d6 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new ee40b4ab 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 3e71b37f 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new c055156b 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 720dd071 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new bfa901c9 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...]
new 1f4161a9 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 6745d950 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 48d7591a 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 9de0aa83 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 2791d9f1 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits
new 3180d4ad 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new d632cb9c 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 6d9c113c 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 1e358c0d 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 91f000ce 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new a632c8ee 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits
new f91a86d6 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...]
new cef86a81 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits
new dd0a821b 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 1b9c6470 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 6819e2a9 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new febde160 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 8ceae474 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 8a7e4023 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new f5e21f5b 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...]
new 951b2e12 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new f2907da6 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...]
new 742d82bf 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...]
new 41315424 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new de4a995a 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 7e959f1a 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new b6380dd9 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new cb0dc528 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 3c773a14 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new f7d4320c 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 39c240db onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new beac5f0f onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new c4fe303f onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 5642ab1c onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 80c9344f onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions.
That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the
branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs
when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository
containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (37f4a380)
\
N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O
revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions
from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still
refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 67 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this
repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions
listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only
been added to this reference.
Summary of changes:
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
the administrator of this repository.
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3
in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3.
discards b294e594 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 43355f23 onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 9d52618b onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards c1c5d42e onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 04dc7df9 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards e8e8fd71 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards e84ac6e9 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards d834d439 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 421678c0 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 9f4aea67 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards f7ded92a 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 46a3dbdb 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 9ddf4f18 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...]
discards bb9e6980 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...]
discards fa19fece 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 4a071154 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...]
discards 69dc4d6e 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards b0162c58 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards b7ef7f81 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 7b4e442a 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards d9dc91fe 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 631b6c57 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 05ab167e 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits
discards ff6a0ab7 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...]
discards de053262 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits
discards e28db607 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards ae80633d 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 7b59ca84 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 81f18003 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 6c400318 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 80b4eb1c 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits
discards 60b61c49 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 5b39de93 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 93aeb41a 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 993d19e2 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 5af8dd8e 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...]
discards b4c93330 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards a72fdf94 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 4a21dee4 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 7c8ae4c6 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 043aaa46 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 915ca6d0 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...]
discards 36dd4bae 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...]
discards 9e4b74b9 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits
discards eab6868e 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...]
discards 96469fa0 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits
discards 51f612e5 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 58e886cc 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards f05092a0 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...]
discards 346b1190 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits
discards db3d5eab 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...]
discards 7424f6e2 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits
discards 98c17fa8 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards e23f3e85 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards 47a5f1c2 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 1d935ff1 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards ab2e2c96 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 873be153 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 5d602962 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...]
discards c407d5c0 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits
discards 6c6c60f3 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...]
discards b1b9c318 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 76227ba0 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits
discards a8f03006 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 13cd06ba 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 0fc6110d 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...]
discards 9913d738 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits
discards 7a1c794b 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...]
new f50bec0e force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ [...]
new d1f9cfdf 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits
new 59edd422 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...]
new 79189f0d 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 87cc3f22 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 86ad6b77 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits
new 117bd3ef 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 32683eef 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...]
new 690c654f 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits
new 969db399 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...]
new a0e020a9 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 30244c74 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 08020035 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new 350b0887 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 85f166e4 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new c28d7f35 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new c22857d1 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits
new 05129c4e 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...]
new 20c1977d 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits
new 7308dffe 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...]
new 155c6734 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new 2c1c7b9b 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new c154427e 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits
new 4fc45611 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...]
new fc5516f4 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits
new 61fdf27c 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...]
new e2f6dc8c 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...]
new a19657f5 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new fa19be87 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 580401fc 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new ce060179 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 6f0f3a56 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 04d8c419 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...]
new f88b80d3 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new dcf878d2 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 9e202558 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 4346c7a4 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 546be5ac 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits
new 5f6b30bf 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new bf133be7 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 1baac59e 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new b48d6777 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 08f1e703 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 56ecdcce 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits
new 293e044e 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...]
new f04b6cb9 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits
new 3f6d0d5f 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 91741b0f 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new a1a7086f 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 40c784ff 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 632904f0 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new a164cb78 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new e61e0b39 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...]
new 393b66ce 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 53adfdf2 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...]
new 0aa87ca1 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...]
new 9e89f2c5 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new a7461c9f 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 47258483 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 1d8de04a 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 3a93e00d 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new c2f455cd 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new b0144268 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 01b6488c onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new d5794c64 onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 36ac4e4c onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 2b900ee6 onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 37f4a380 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions.
That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the
branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs
when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository
containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (b294e594)
\
N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O
revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions
from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still
refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 68 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this
repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions
listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only
been added to this reference.
Summary of changes:
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
the administrator of this repository.
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3
in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3.
discards 8977f096 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 3e04e87b onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 6f811b3e onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 714aea8b onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 71e19793 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 2a3f50e1 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 19d5f836 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 24906b6e 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 098f21d6 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards e4d1a71d 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 63f23f35 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards eb721984 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 695063bd 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...]
discards 6c4de349 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...]
discards 8ecd2a73 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 70c20b1a 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...]
discards 00b68224 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 1c7bf7f6 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 4e516650 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 79b9de3f 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 0396cc00 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 4a1adf1e 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards a84fe72f 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits
discards 84e70650 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...]
discards c48ff9ab 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits
discards 52f14027 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 4dae1170 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards fec31f70 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards d6a1370f 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 7cdd87f5 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 8b29f6c7 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits
discards af201f48 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 718d6dfc 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards dbb52250 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 0cc63be7 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards a3a40572 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...]
discards 33d17ba9 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards f0c08da1 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards f8c5a37a 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 385573dd 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 43ec5a54 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 9c072474 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...]
discards b026cce8 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...]
discards 48f818c7 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits
discards d93cfa29 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...]
discards 85da614a 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits
discards 393dc007 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards b0748f1d 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards 6ff7fa5e 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...]
discards aefb67c4 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits
discards 8367f10c 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...]
discards 0793dada 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits
discards 62640361 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 76bb41c7 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards 91a175f5 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 8f6e9a7d 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards b8b8aa1e 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 04ea231f 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards d0bf2e9a 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...]
discards 7edc88a8 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits
discards 9050e281 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...]
discards 251bbb96 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 8e04b417 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits
discards 749d4d6d 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 59fe387e 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 5c7965aa 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...]
discards 8d36d1d8 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits
discards 1ebdf501 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...]
discards 1517314f 6: force: #353: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits
new eacbe55c force: #353: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ [...]
new 7a1c794b 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...]
new 9913d738 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits
new 0fc6110d 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...]
new 13cd06ba 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new a8f03006 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 76227ba0 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits
new b1b9c318 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 6c6c60f3 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...]
new c407d5c0 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits
new 5d602962 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...]
new 873be153 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new ab2e2c96 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 1d935ff1 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new 47a5f1c2 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new e23f3e85 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new 98c17fa8 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 7424f6e2 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits
new db3d5eab 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...]
new 346b1190 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits
new f05092a0 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...]
new 58e886cc 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new 51f612e5 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 96469fa0 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits
new eab6868e 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...]
new 9e4b74b9 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits
new 36dd4bae 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...]
new 915ca6d0 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...]
new 043aaa46 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 7c8ae4c6 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 4a21dee4 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new a72fdf94 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new b4c93330 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 5af8dd8e 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...]
new 993d19e2 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 93aeb41a 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 5b39de93 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 60b61c49 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 80b4eb1c 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits
new 6c400318 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 81f18003 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 7b59ca84 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new ae80633d 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new e28db607 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new de053262 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits
new ff6a0ab7 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...]
new 05ab167e 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits
new 631b6c57 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new d9dc91fe 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 7b4e442a 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new b7ef7f81 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new b0162c58 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 69dc4d6e 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 4a071154 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...]
new fa19fece 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new bb9e6980 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...]
new 9ddf4f18 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...]
new 46a3dbdb 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new f7ded92a 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 9f4aea67 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 421678c0 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new d834d439 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new e84ac6e9 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new e8e8fd71 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 04dc7df9 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new c1c5d42e onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 9d52618b onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 43355f23 onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new b294e594 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions.
That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the
branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs
when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository
containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (8977f096)
\
N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O
revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions
from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still
refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 69 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this
repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions
listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only
been added to this reference.
Summary of changes:
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
the administrator of this repository.