This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3
in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3.
discards 6f0877a8 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards b22e022e onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 0bec4d5b onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards c643c8db onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards e9b1d10c onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards f81c4c0b 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 205ab2bb 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards d1bcc66e 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 00212c1e 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 96940dff 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 67713cbe 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 39777506 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards a1f68054 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...]
discards b8f556cf 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...]
discards f5b66b7d 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards cf93907f 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...]
discards b60dc0df 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 97db8941 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 2687201d 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards fb4420f7 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 0a821e8d 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards e2b0354c 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards f35bef1c 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits
discards 9845fc8b 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...]
discards e68678e9 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits
discards 329f5d0d 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 0e06bf1b 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards e398e1ff 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 322d77e2 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 37005e58 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 9681dc02 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits
discards a6584119 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 31fa73ea 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards b506dd3e 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards f9c1c37e 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 37a624f3 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...]
discards 18e131aa 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 21431ae4 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 268b9717 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 89eb81ba 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 01277c3e 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards a1b1c671 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...]
discards b12bd015 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...]
discards f9741cd9 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits
discards d9f1dee2 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...]
discards 71ff52c6 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits
discards 4c3733bb 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 76536028 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards 9627e3f3 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...]
discards ffa8bf51 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits
discards c7704092 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...]
discards 3af4a0ab 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits
discards a6595cdd 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards eb9d859f 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards ca6a1481 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards de05e389 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards b00a964f 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 59898a79 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 622ac800 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...]
discards 9ef22490 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits
discards 4fcb6496 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...]
discards caba6445 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 684a9e46 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits
discards 4f532ad0 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 4ea28cc7 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards ef04e477 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...]
discards e6f5d4fc 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits
discards bc9b1b1d 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...]
discards bc2a2a46 6: force: #353: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits
discards 3732c7ce 5: onsuccess: #351: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK a [...]
new 3a015f58 onsuccess: #351: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
new 1517314f 6: force: #353: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits
new 1ebdf501 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...]
new 8d36d1d8 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits
new 5c7965aa 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...]
new 59fe387e 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 749d4d6d 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 8e04b417 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits
new 251bbb96 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 9050e281 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...]
new 7edc88a8 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits
new d0bf2e9a 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...]
new 04ea231f 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new b8b8aa1e 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 8f6e9a7d 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new 91a175f5 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 76bb41c7 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new 62640361 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 0793dada 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits
new 8367f10c 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...]
new aefb67c4 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits
new 6ff7fa5e 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...]
new b0748f1d 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new 393dc007 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 85da614a 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits
new d93cfa29 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...]
new 48f818c7 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits
new b026cce8 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...]
new 9c072474 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...]
new 43ec5a54 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 385573dd 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new f8c5a37a 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new f0c08da1 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 33d17ba9 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new a3a40572 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...]
new 0cc63be7 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new dbb52250 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 718d6dfc 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new af201f48 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 8b29f6c7 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits
new 7cdd87f5 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new d6a1370f 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new fec31f70 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 4dae1170 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 52f14027 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new c48ff9ab 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits
new 84e70650 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...]
new a84fe72f 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits
new 4a1adf1e 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 0396cc00 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 79b9de3f 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 4e516650 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 1c7bf7f6 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 00b68224 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 70c20b1a 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...]
new 8ecd2a73 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 6c4de349 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...]
new 695063bd 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...]
new eb721984 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 63f23f35 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new e4d1a71d 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 098f21d6 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 24906b6e 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 19d5f836 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 2a3f50e1 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 71e19793 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 714aea8b onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 6f811b3e onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 3e04e87b onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 8977f096 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions.
That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the
branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs
when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository
containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (6f0877a8)
\
N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O
revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions
from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still
refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 70 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this
repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions
listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only
been added to this reference.
Summary of changes:
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
the administrator of this repository.
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch master
in repository toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.
from e73b5635 Add entry 7f04b0d786e13ff5c1bd952a24fd324224415c9a from https [...]
new 60f8609a Add entry 7f04b0d786e13ff5c1bd952a24fd324224415c9a from https [...]
The 1 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this
repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions
listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only
been added to this reference.
Summary of changes:
.../commit-log.txt | 12 +++++
.../jira/components | 0
.../jira/description | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++
.../jira/startdate | 1 +
.../jira/summary | 1 +
.../status.txt | 42 +++++++++++++++++
.../gnu-arm-master-O3/details.txt | 3 ++
.../reproduction_instructions.txt | 8 ++--
.../gnu-arm-master-O3/status.txt | 3 ++
.../tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/status.txt | 4 ++
10 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/sha1/7f04b0d786e13ff5c1bd952a24fd324224415c9a/commit-log.txt
copy gcc/sha1/{000f8b9a6a0ec7eaae9535e73c8f4fc3ea10a364 => 7f04b0d786e13ff5c1bd952 [...]
create mode 100644 gcc/sha1/7f04b0d786e13ff5c1bd952a24fd324224415c9a/jira/description
create mode 100644 gcc/sha1/7f04b0d786e13ff5c1bd952a24fd324224415c9a/jira/startdate
create mode 100644 gcc/sha1/7f04b0d786e13ff5c1bd952a24fd324224415c9a/jira/summary
create mode 100644 gcc/sha1/7f04b0d786e13ff5c1bd952a24fd324224415c9a/status.txt
create mode 100644 gcc/sha1/7f04b0d786e13ff5c1bd952a24fd324224415c9a/tcwg_bmk-code [...]
copy {llvm/sha1/8cf0290c4a47aa184b7b28032ec7a0f7311ff7c5/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k [...]
create mode 100644 gcc/sha1/7f04b0d786e13ff5c1bd952a24fd324224415c9a/tcwg_bmk-code [...]
create mode 100644 gcc/sha1/7f04b0d786e13ff5c1bd952a24fd324224415c9a/tcwg_bmk-code [...]
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
the administrator of this repository.
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch master
in repository toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.
from c413f187 Add entry 386aa2ab9d19c783deb9fbfb3b9be14754ba8789 from https [...]
new e73b5635 Add entry 7f04b0d786e13ff5c1bd952a24fd324224415c9a from https [...]
The 1 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this
repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions
listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only
been added to this reference.
Summary of changes:
.../gnu-arm-master-O3}/build_url | 0
.../gnu-arm-master-O3}/last_good | 0
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
copy gcc/sha1/7f04b0d786e13ff5c1bd952a24fd324224415c9a/{tcwg_bmk_gnu_tk1/gnu-maste [...]
copy gcc/sha1/7f04b0d786e13ff5c1bd952a24fd324224415c9a/{tcwg_bmk_gnu_tk1/gnu-maste [...]
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
the administrator of this repository.
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3
in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3.
discards 9b860cd8 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 744e6fc7 onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 6f1bc48f onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 9a2f7b91 onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 4e3f0a88 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 14884ba4 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 5d83cb24 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 491cdfb4 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 5216868e 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 44b7fd95 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards a0c19cca 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 2dffae42 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 1550ae30 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...]
discards 65982dcf 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...]
discards e22413ba 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 5cfb09d0 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...]
discards 6f39bf90 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 87b87969 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards f8418af4 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 134c4d70 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 176c2603 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 4c5b70dc 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 2ead0359 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits
discards 49b91b06 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...]
discards f10b18d2 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits
discards 8ed7169b 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 0538098b 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 9ecbda53 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 990681c3 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards de758185 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 97870945 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits
discards 8322c8cb 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 18297f11 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 6cf2c999 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 3e91d850 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards acac9b05 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...]
discards e092c4a1 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards da5a79cc 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 03b07218 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 50941ff6 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 0609b478 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards a735af28 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...]
discards 9d545686 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...]
discards b5d6285a 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits
discards 0755c36e 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...]
discards ee93734e 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits
discards 30f693f9 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 2e2ffedd 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards 8ff78eb1 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...]
discards b6807288 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits
discards df463f4d 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...]
discards 52818f02 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits
discards e26c0871 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards b0a4ae6f 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards e61cd3a9 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 9e933bfe 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards e93a677b 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 9085c56c 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards d9385e1f 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...]
discards bc35b8b6 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits
discards a75de7b3 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...]
discards e6f86fd4 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 6de18bec 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits
discards 088c0910 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 8042864f 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards b443f7b3 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...]
discards 656fa6d5 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits
discards 6ecdb2d7 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...]
discards 358b1f42 6: force: #353: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits
discards 63e1de88 5: onsuccess: #351: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK a [...]
discards b822456f 4: onsuccess: #349: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 1565 commits
new 8bb89b42 onsuccess: #349: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
new 3732c7ce 5: onsuccess: #351: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK a [...]
new bc2a2a46 6: force: #353: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits
new bc9b1b1d 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...]
new e6f5d4fc 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits
new ef04e477 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...]
new 4ea28cc7 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 4f532ad0 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 684a9e46 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits
new caba6445 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 4fcb6496 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...]
new 9ef22490 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits
new 622ac800 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...]
new 59898a79 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new b00a964f 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new de05e389 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new ca6a1481 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new eb9d859f 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new a6595cdd 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 3af4a0ab 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits
new c7704092 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...]
new ffa8bf51 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits
new 9627e3f3 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...]
new 76536028 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new 4c3733bb 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 71ff52c6 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits
new d9f1dee2 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...]
new f9741cd9 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits
new b12bd015 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...]
new a1b1c671 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...]
new 01277c3e 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 89eb81ba 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 268b9717 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 21431ae4 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 18e131aa 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 37a624f3 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...]
new f9c1c37e 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new b506dd3e 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 31fa73ea 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new a6584119 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 9681dc02 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits
new 37005e58 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 322d77e2 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new e398e1ff 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 0e06bf1b 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 329f5d0d 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new e68678e9 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits
new 9845fc8b 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...]
new f35bef1c 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits
new e2b0354c 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 0a821e8d 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new fb4420f7 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 2687201d 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 97db8941 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new b60dc0df 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new cf93907f 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...]
new f5b66b7d 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new b8f556cf 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...]
new a1f68054 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...]
new 39777506 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 67713cbe 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 96940dff 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 00212c1e 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new d1bcc66e 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 205ab2bb 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new f81c4c0b 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new e9b1d10c onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new c643c8db onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 0bec4d5b onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new b22e022e onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 6f0877a8 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions.
That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the
branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs
when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository
containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (9b860cd8)
\
N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O
revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions
from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still
refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 71 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this
repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions
listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only
been added to this reference.
Summary of changes:
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
the administrator of this repository.
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3
in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3.
discards 26c21ee7 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards d5d1763f onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 1acf8d62 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 1445c72c onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards a63b1807 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 99b6fef7 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 440c456b 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards caa479f2 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards d5f93517 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 3d5700e5 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 8f98f599 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 2e0b5ee4 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards f5421dca 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...]
discards dea9cfd5 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...]
discards bea9d54f 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 2cd0a8dd 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...]
discards 189b7af9 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards a8b1b4ae 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 19db2b63 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 7ff4e8f2 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards f1d74b5e 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 5a915d2c 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards aaeec24c 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits
discards 4c594308 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...]
discards 8ac22c30 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits
discards 6eace83f 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards e08d9d64 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 476cdbf9 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 12cfe9da 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 6cd55b16 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 0451b06e 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits
discards 1de8f251 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 356b1db9 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards c852be7a 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 2173d497 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards daf27939 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...]
discards 45c41f15 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards eb3fd273 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 37db471d 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 0498bb75 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 13fd5d1f 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 663a144c 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...]
discards 4336c961 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...]
discards 4de20edc 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits
discards 3c4592fb 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...]
discards e1055fdf 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits
discards b56891ca 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 79d6c08d 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards 45fd0efe 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...]
discards d3a9462a 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits
discards 97b3c239 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...]
discards a3010320 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits
discards 5bc1b54d 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards c0809bf2 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards 0d7a8994 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards b39a09c6 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards be8677d3 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 035734ed 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards e678d793 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...]
discards 0c29d51c 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits
discards 219713b4 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...]
discards 8133a95a 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 6bb75bac 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits
discards 1f57d302 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 24a2e956 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 1f721be3 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...]
discards dadd4bf6 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits
discards be5bd5ed 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...]
discards e4b78384 6: force: #353: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits
discards d3729fd9 5: onsuccess: #351: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK a [...]
discards 868dd11a 4: onsuccess: #349: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 1565 commits
discards 6dbb842a 3: force: #348: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build after [...]
new b226a174 force: #348: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ [...]
new b822456f 4: onsuccess: #349: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 1565 commits
new 63e1de88 5: onsuccess: #351: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK a [...]
new 358b1f42 6: force: #353: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits
new 6ecdb2d7 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...]
new 656fa6d5 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits
new b443f7b3 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...]
new 8042864f 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 088c0910 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 6de18bec 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits
new e6f86fd4 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new a75de7b3 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...]
new bc35b8b6 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits
new d9385e1f 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...]
new 9085c56c 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new e93a677b 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 9e933bfe 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new e61cd3a9 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new b0a4ae6f 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new e26c0871 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 52818f02 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits
new df463f4d 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...]
new b6807288 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits
new 8ff78eb1 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...]
new 2e2ffedd 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new 30f693f9 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new ee93734e 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits
new 0755c36e 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...]
new b5d6285a 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits
new 9d545686 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...]
new a735af28 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...]
new 0609b478 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 50941ff6 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 03b07218 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new da5a79cc 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new e092c4a1 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new acac9b05 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...]
new 3e91d850 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 6cf2c999 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 18297f11 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 8322c8cb 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 97870945 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits
new de758185 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 990681c3 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 9ecbda53 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 0538098b 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 8ed7169b 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new f10b18d2 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits
new 49b91b06 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...]
new 2ead0359 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits
new 4c5b70dc 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 176c2603 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 134c4d70 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new f8418af4 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 87b87969 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 6f39bf90 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 5cfb09d0 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...]
new e22413ba 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 65982dcf 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...]
new 1550ae30 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...]
new 2dffae42 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new a0c19cca 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 44b7fd95 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 5216868e 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 491cdfb4 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 5d83cb24 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 14884ba4 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 4e3f0a88 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 9a2f7b91 onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 6f1bc48f onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 744e6fc7 onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 9b860cd8 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions.
That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the
branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs
when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository
containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (26c21ee7)
\
N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O
revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions
from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still
refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 72 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this
repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions
listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only
been added to this reference.
Summary of changes:
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
the administrator of this repository.