This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3
in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3.
discards 4af2dc532 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 7d36cd6c9 onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 9024c6c46 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 1fd3ff82f onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 83ae8ed89 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 3dd7b3eb1 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 7e3dd193a 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 73de17b0e 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 2a915303a 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 62a71811d 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards cc302ee20 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards dcbc2d763 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 37a6d6c46 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...]
discards 1598f9a77 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...]
discards 3026df64c 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards db2ab67c8 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...]
discards 5cb126b0d 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 38da66647 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 9dc2be4ef 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards c09b1846b 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 3cdaedc77 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards ef760ff48 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards a26b48b04 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits
discards 4ade0c5de 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...]
discards 27b32aa4f 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits
discards c1913c3fb 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 66dd05c89 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 6d2e10c5d 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 289610c65 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards dcc7aa6ed 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards a954899aa 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits
discards 514213602 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards b21b985ac 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 79e0c16cd 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards c50b5cfb5 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards db164775f 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...]
discards e2e09296d 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 21a385fc1 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards a26fa5cf5 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 7dfbf9b60 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 7f304132e 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards b6de9ff47 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...]
discards c09c16838 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...]
discards 2f69a04e2 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits
discards 02087ed04 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...]
discards 1fd27d580 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits
discards 53d6cacd4 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards f0fbe2a56 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards d39512e1c 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...]
discards f4870509c 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits
discards 32a853617 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...]
discards 207f69642 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits
discards 25fefe624 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards cb83fb12c 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards 8d566d1fb 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 9e12ed0d5 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards c3bb7ba25 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 2a720964c 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 08f3aea3f 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...]
new 7463f2d5d onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
new e40ae4863 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 0184d370e 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new c80930de7 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new 879210a9c 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 9ae7bc646 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new ea5951513 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 824cbdac7 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits
new 6d0328805 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...]
new 1065b1a58 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits
new a4d52945f 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...]
new 5ed87a35a 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new 871c48307 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 6e5cea558 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits
new 0752ed40f 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...]
new f686925f7 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits
new e62b35ec7 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...]
new e135b372b 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...]
new 1d8998169 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 1f8933fd7 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 078d7d87b 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 47076d10f 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 82f69b9a2 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 993eb0115 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...]
new ccc4991ef 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 8500c1136 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new bd5d3c9a0 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new fc8573033 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 9258ad69b 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits
new 7ad16d488 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 1ee1e6330 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 13e3b981e 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 1a081dffc 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new cf76fa81e 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 3f3468e06 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits
new b2e25b517 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...]
new 36e99ae01 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits
new e0f3d9dc8 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new de669e71c 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new c7d548dd0 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 268083e2a 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 428569cb2 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new c4180ec6d 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 1006582ab 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...]
new f593891cf 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 4bf47df0a 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...]
new 262308140 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...]
new d49d4ca52 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 92afac1c0 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new db9403fda 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new cc6909ac1 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 4f9ee4d1e 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 20a1b4a26 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 9663b2f0f 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 2954298d0 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 8dcc12b81 onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new ccd16500e onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new bdac5e65d onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 536efe64f onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions.
That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the
branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs
when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository
containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (4af2dc532)
\
N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O
revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions
from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still
refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 59 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this
repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions
listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only
been added to this reference.
Summary of changes:
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
the administrator of this repository.
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-arm-next-defconfig
in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-arm-next-defconfig.
from 5a175a2 onsuccess: #51: boot: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...]
new 30f1569 onsuccess: #52: boot: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...]
The 1 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this
repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions
listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only
been added to this reference.
Summary of changes:
01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2284 -> 2280 bytes
02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2576 -> 2664 bytes
03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27812 -> 27700 bytes
03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17748 -> 17728 bytes
04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 92636 -> 92160 bytes
04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 72176 -> 71988 bytes
05-build_abe-qemu/console.log.xz | Bin 32744 -> 34444 bytes
05-build_abe-qemu/make-qemu.log.xz | Bin 21404 -> 22808 bytes
06-build_linux/console.log.xz | Bin 2920 -> 2896 bytes
07-boot_linux/console.log.xz | Bin 5760 -> 5756 bytes
08-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 1212 -> 1192 bytes
git/binutils_rev | 2 +-
git/gcc_rev | 2 +-
git/linux_rev | 2 +-
git/qemu_rev | 2 +-
jenkins/build-name | 2 +-
jenkins/notify-full.log | 234 ++++++++++++++---------------
jenkins/notify-init.log | 90 +++++------
jenkins/rewrite.log | 20 +--
jenkins/run-build.env | 6 +-
manifest.sh | 4 +-
notify/jira/comments.txt | 2 +-
notify/mail-body.txt | 56 +++----
notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +-
24 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 212 deletions(-)
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
the administrator of this repository.
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3
in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3.
discards 8ddb2bdba onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards ad327942c onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards d1e6fab69 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards d2080a24f onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards 391fe3130 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards fc965e1e1 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards bf84f6ad9 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 66bcfeaa9 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards e3bfc87e9 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
discards d683ead2f 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 55d440cae 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 598d4d270 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 07c3e6917 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...]
discards f73771474 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...]
discards 9711fabf2 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
discards 9f4808efd 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...]
discards 6f35f914d 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 513b1bf6a 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 4cbd09c5e 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards f953a84b4 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards 9acacb3a4 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards afcaba1e9 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
discards b05f2aead 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits
discards 07a2222f1 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...]
discards 9a47e1e86 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits
discards ea63e2c9c 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 62cceae2b 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 0b7f1a1d1 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 80bf50d75 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 7b056ab26 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards a2e72cbe9 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits
discards 428434e8e 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards ef700ed89 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 3d2f249cd 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
discards 90cb523b1 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 5026e9b6e 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...]
discards 92d65b657 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 2629e8f0b 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 846a0afef 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 061c09ebe 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards adbd7fdde 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards f7f563f92 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...]
discards ce4c7f030 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...]
discards 35d043801 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits
discards cadd22ac2 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...]
discards 1ee6424d3 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits
discards a0498aa7c 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards ca2ee3295 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards 5c63d230d 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...]
discards 11ef89d17 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits
discards aadec29ee 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...]
discards a50b538ee 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits
discards e9a90e7db 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 8e709f5a2 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards f93ad85df 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards aa0214afb 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
discards beaa29212 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards 0cf3b9ee2 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
discards ba39b747c 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...]
discards 29fb6ff8a 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits
new c4d0e926d onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
new 08f3aea3f 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...]
new 2a720964c 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new c3bb7ba25 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 9e12ed0d5 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new 8d566d1fb 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new cb83fb12c 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new 25fefe624 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 207f69642 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits
new 32a853617 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...]
new f4870509c 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits
new d39512e1c 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...]
new f0fbe2a56 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...]
new 53d6cacd4 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 1fd27d580 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits
new 02087ed04 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...]
new 2f69a04e2 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits
new c09c16838 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...]
new b6de9ff47 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...]
new 7f304132e 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 7dfbf9b60 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new a26fa5cf5 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 21a385fc1 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new e2e09296d 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new db164775f 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...]
new c50b5cfb5 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...]
new 79e0c16cd 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new b21b985ac 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 514213602 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new a954899aa 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits
new dcc7aa6ed 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 289610c65 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 6d2e10c5d 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 66dd05c89 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new c1913c3fb 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...]
new 27b32aa4f 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits
new 4ade0c5de 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...]
new a26b48b04 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits
new ef760ff48 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 3cdaedc77 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new c09b1846b 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 9dc2be4ef 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 38da66647 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new 5cb126b0d 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...]
new db2ab67c8 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...]
new 3026df64c 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 1598f9a77 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...]
new 37a6d6c46 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...]
new dcbc2d763 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new cc302ee20 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 62a71811d 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 2a915303a 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 73de17b0e 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 7e3dd193a 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 3dd7b3eb1 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...]
new 83ae8ed89 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 1fd3ff82f onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 9024c6c46 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 7d36cd6c9 onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
new 4af2dc532 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions.
That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the
branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs
when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository
containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (8ddb2bdba)
\
N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O
revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions
from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still
refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 60 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this
repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions
listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only
been added to this reference.
Summary of changes:
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
the administrator of this repository.