Hi
We got in Debian a request to backport 3c591faadd8a ("Reapply "Revert
drm/amd/display: Enable Freesync Video Mode by default"") for the
kernel in Debian bookworm, based on 6.1.y stable series.
https://bugs.debian.org/1119232
While looking at he request, I noticed that the series of commits had
a bit of a convuluted history. AFAICT the story began with:
de05abe6b9d0 ("drm/amd/display: Enable Freesync Video Mode by
default"), this landed in 5.18-rc1 (and backported to v6.1.5,
v6.0.19).
This was then reverted with 4243c84aa082 ("Revert "drm/amd/display:
Enable Freesync Video Mode by default""), which landed in v6.3-rc1
(and in turn was backported to v6.1.53).
So far we are in sync.
The above was then reverted again, via 11b92df8a2f7 ("Revert "Revert
drm/amd/display: Enable Freesync Video Mode by default"") applied in
v6.5-rc1 and as well backported to v6.1.53 (so still in sync).
Now comes were we are diverging: 3c591faadd8a ("Reapply "Revert
drm/amd/display: Enable Freesync Video Mode by default"") got applied
later on, landing in v6.9-rc1 but *not* in 6.1.y anymore.
I suspect this one was not applied to 6.1.y because in meanwhile there
was a conflict to cherry-pick it cleanly due to context changes due to
3e094a287526 ("drm/amd/display: Use drm_connector in
create_stream_for_sink").
If this is correct, then the 6.1.y series can be brough in sync with
cherry-picking the commit and adjust the context around the change.
I'm attaching the proposed change.
Alex in particular, does that make sense?
Regards,
Salvatore
A malicious user could pass an arbitrarily bad value
to memdup_user_nul(), potentially causing kernel crash.
This follows the same pattern as commit ee76746387f6
("netdevsim: prevent bad user input in nsim_dev_health_break_write()")
and commit 7ef4c19d245f
("smackfs: restrict bytes count in smackfs write functions")
Found via static analysis and code review.
Fixes: 183238ffb886 ("misc: eeprom/idt_89hpesx: Switch to memdup_user_nul() helper")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006(a)gmail.com>
---
drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c
index 60c42170d147..b2e771bfc6da 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c
@@ -907,6 +907,9 @@ static ssize_t idt_dbgfs_csr_write(struct file *filep, const char __user *ubuf,
if (*offp)
return 0;
+ if (count == 0 || count > PAGE_SIZE)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
/* Copy data from User-space */
buf = memdup_user_nul(ubuf, count);
if (IS_ERR(buf))
--
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)
MAX77705 charger is most likely always a single device on the board,
however nothing stops board designers to have two of them, thus same
device driver could probe twice. Or user could manually try to probing
second time.
Device driver is not ready for that case, because it allocates
statically 'struct regmap_irq_chip' as non-const and stores during
probe in 'irq_drv_data' member a pointer to per-probe state
container ('struct max77705_charger_data'). devm_regmap_add_irq_chip()
does not make a copy of 'struct regmap_irq_chip' but stores the pointer.
Second probe - either successful or failure - would overwrite the
'irq_drv_data' from previous device probe, so interrupts would be
executed in a wrong context.
Fixes: a6a494c8e3ce ("power: supply: max77705: Add charger driver for Maxim 77705")
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski(a)linaro.org>
---
Not tested on hardware
---
drivers/power/supply/max77705_charger.c | 14 ++++++++++----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/max77705_charger.c b/drivers/power/supply/max77705_charger.c
index b1a227bf72e2..1044bf58aeac 100644
--- a/drivers/power/supply/max77705_charger.c
+++ b/drivers/power/supply/max77705_charger.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static const struct regmap_irq max77705_charger_irqs[] = {
REGMAP_IRQ_REG_LINE(MAX77705_AICL_I, BITS_PER_BYTE),
};
-static struct regmap_irq_chip max77705_charger_irq_chip = {
+static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77705_charger_irq_chip = {
.name = "max77705-charger",
.status_base = MAX77705_CHG_REG_INT,
.mask_base = MAX77705_CHG_REG_INT_MASK,
@@ -567,6 +567,7 @@ static int max77705_charger_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
{
struct power_supply_config pscfg = {};
struct max77705_charger_data *chg;
+ struct regmap_irq_chip *chip_desc;
struct device *dev;
struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data;
int ret;
@@ -580,6 +581,13 @@ static int max77705_charger_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
chg->dev = dev;
i2c_set_clientdata(i2c, chg);
+ chip_desc = devm_kmemdup(dev, &max77705_charger_irq_chip,
+ sizeof(max77705_charger_irq_chip),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!chip_desc)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ chip_desc->irq_drv_data = chg;
+
chg->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(i2c, &max77705_chg_regmap_config);
if (IS_ERR(chg->regmap))
return PTR_ERR(chg->regmap);
@@ -599,11 +607,9 @@ static int max77705_charger_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
if (IS_ERR(chg->psy_chg))
return PTR_ERR(chg->psy_chg);
- max77705_charger_irq_chip.irq_drv_data = chg;
ret = devm_regmap_add_irq_chip(chg->dev, chg->regmap, i2c->irq,
IRQF_ONESHOT, 0,
- &max77705_charger_irq_chip,
- &irq_data);
+ chip_desc, &irq_data);
if (ret)
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to add irq chip\n");
--
2.48.1