On Sun, Dec 21, 2025 at 03:42:58PM -0800, Ethan Nelson-Moore wrote:
> Hi, Andrew,
>
> The other two are correct because they intend to write multiple registers -
> they are used with a length parameter.
Please don't top post.
How finished do you think this driver is? Are there likely to be more
instances of SR_WR_REG/SR_WR_REGS added in the future? If so, it might
make sense to change the code to make this sort of error less likely.
SR_WR_MULTIPLE_REG and SR_WR_ONE_REG?
Andrew
The hw clock gating register sequence consists of register value pairs
that are written to the GPU during initialisation.
The a690 hwcg sequence has two GMU registers in it that used to amount
to random writes in the GPU mapping, but since commit 188db3d7fe66
("drm/msm/a6xx: Rebase GMU register offsets") they trigger a fault as
the updated offsets now lie outside the mapping. This in turn breaks
boot of machines like the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s.
Note that the updates of these GMU registers is already taken care of
properly since commit 40c297eb245b ("drm/msm/a6xx: Set GMU CGC
properties on a6xx too"), but for some reason these two entries were
left in the table.
Fixes: 5e7665b5e484 ("drm/msm/adreno: Add Adreno A690 support")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 6.5
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson(a)kernel.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
index 29107b362346..4c2f739ee9b7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
@@ -501,8 +501,6 @@ static const struct adreno_reglist a690_hwcg[] = {
{REG_A6XX_RBBM_CLOCK_CNTL_GMU_GX, 0x00000222},
{REG_A6XX_RBBM_CLOCK_DELAY_GMU_GX, 0x00000111},
{REG_A6XX_RBBM_CLOCK_HYST_GMU_GX, 0x00000555},
- {REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_AO_GMU_CGC_DELAY_CNTL, 0x10111},
- {REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_AO_GMU_CGC_HYST_CNTL, 0x5555},
{}
};
--
2.51.2
This patch series addresses two issues in demote_folio_list()
and can_demote() in reclaim/demotion.
Commit 7d709f49babc ("vmscan,cgroup: apply mems_effective to reclaim")
introduces the cpuset.mems_effective check and applies it to
can_demote(). However:
1. It does not apply this check in demote_folio_list(), which leads
to situations where pages are demoted to nodes that are
explicitly excluded from the task's cpuset.mems.
2. It checks only the nodes in the immediate next demotion hierarchy
and does not check all allowed demotion targets in can_demote().
This can cause pages to never be demoted if the nodes in the next
demotion hierarchy are not set in mems_effective.
To address these bugs, implement a new function
mem_cgroup_filter_mems_allowed() to filter out nodes that are not
set in mems_effective, and update demote_folio_list() and can_demote()
accordingly.
Reproduct Bug 1:
Assume a system with 4 nodes, where nodes 0-1 are top-tier and
nodes 2-3 are far-tier memory. All nodes have equal capacity.
Test script to reproduct:
echo 1 > /sys/kernel/mm/numa/demotion_enabled
mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/test
echo +cpuset > /sys/fs/cgroup/cgroup.subtree_control
echo "0-2" > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/cpuset.mems
echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/cgroup.procs
swapoff -a
# Expectation: Should respect node 0-2 limit.
# Observation: Node 3 shows significant allocation (MemFree drops)
stress-ng --oomable --vm 1 --vm-bytes 150% --mbind 0,1
Reproduct Bug 2:
Assume a system with 6 nodes, where nodes 0-2 are top-tier,
node 3 is far-tier node, and nodes 4-5 are the farthest-tier nodes.
All nodes have equal capacity.
Test script:
echo 1 > /sys/kernel/mm/numa/demotion_enabled
mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/test
echo +cpuset > /sys/fs/cgroup/cgroup.subtree_control
echo "0-2,4-5" > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/cpuset.mems
echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/cgroup.procs
swapoff -a
# Expectation: Pages are demoted to Nodes 4-5
# Observation: No pages are demoted before oom.
stress-ng --oomable --vm 1 --vm-bytes 150% --mbind 0,1,2
Bing Jiao (2):
mm/vmscan: respect mems_effective in demote_folio_list()
mm/vmscan: check all allowed targets in can_demote()
include/linux/cpuset.h | 6 +++---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 6 +++---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 12 +++++-------
mm/memcontrol.c | 5 +++--
mm/vmscan.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
5 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
--
2.52.0.351.gbe84eed79e-goog
This reverts commit 8d3bf19f1b585a3cc0027f508b64c33484db8d0d.
While this fake hotplugging was a nice idea, it has shown that this feature
does not handle PCIe switches correctly:
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: can not insert [bus 43-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: [bus 43-41] end is updated to 43
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: can not insert [bus 43] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:00.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 43] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: can not insert [bus 44-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: [bus 44-41] end is updated to 44
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: can not insert [bus 44] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:02.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 44] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: can not insert [bus 45-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: [bus 45-41] end is updated to 45
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: can not insert [bus 45] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:06.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 45] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: can not insert [bus 46-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: [bus 46-41] end is updated to 46
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: can not insert [bus 46] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:0e.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 46] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:42: busn_res: [bus 42-41] end is updated to 46
pci_bus 0004:42: busn_res: can not insert [bus 42-46] under [bus 41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 41])
pci 0004:41:00.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 42-46] cannot be assigned for them
pcieport 0004:40:00.0: bridge has subordinate 41 but max busn 46
During the initial scan, PCI core doesn't see the switch and since the Root
Port is not hot plug capable, the secondary bus number gets assigned as the
subordinate bus number. This means, the PCI core assumes that only one bus
will appear behind the Root Port since the Root Port is not hot plug
capable.
This works perfectly fine for PCIe endpoints connected to the Root Port,
since they don't extend the bus. However, if a PCIe switch is connected,
then there is a problem when the downstream busses starts showing up and
the PCI core doesn't extend the subordinate bus number after initial scan
during boot.
The long term plan is to migrate this driver to the pwrctrl framework,
once it adds proper support for powering up and enumerating PCIe switches.
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani(a)kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin(a)rock-chips.com>
Tested-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin(a)rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 10 ++--------
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
index 8c41b90a1db1..06c02fcc76c8 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
@@ -665,14 +665,8 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
goto err_remove_edma;
}
- /*
- * Note: Skip the link up delay only when a Link Up IRQ is present.
- * If there is no Link Up IRQ, we should not bypass the delay
- * because that would require users to manually rescan for devices.
- */
- if (!pp->use_linkup_irq)
- /* Ignore errors, the link may come up later */
- dw_pcie_wait_for_link(pci);
+ /* Ignore errors, the link may come up later */
+ dw_pcie_wait_for_link(pci);
ret = pci_host_probe(bridge);
if (ret)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
index fc9cf8ce8629..a3a3f6e89a81 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
@@ -438,7 +438,6 @@ struct dw_pcie_rp {
bool use_atu_msg;
int msg_atu_index;
struct resource *msg_res;
- bool use_linkup_irq;
struct pci_eq_presets presets;
struct pci_config_window *cfg;
bool ecam_enabled;
--
2.52.0
This reverts commit 36971d6c5a9a134c15760ae9fd13c6d5f9a36abb.
While this fake hotplugging was a nice idea, it has shown that this feature
does not handle PCIe switches correctly:
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: can not insert [bus 43-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: [bus 43-41] end is updated to 43
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: can not insert [bus 43] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:00.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 43] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: can not insert [bus 44-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: [bus 44-41] end is updated to 44
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: can not insert [bus 44] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:02.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 44] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: can not insert [bus 45-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: [bus 45-41] end is updated to 45
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: can not insert [bus 45] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:06.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 45] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: can not insert [bus 46-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: [bus 46-41] end is updated to 46
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: can not insert [bus 46] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:0e.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 46] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:42: busn_res: [bus 42-41] end is updated to 46
pci_bus 0004:42: busn_res: can not insert [bus 42-46] under [bus 41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 41])
pci 0004:41:00.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 42-46] cannot be assigned for them
pcieport 0004:40:00.0: bridge has subordinate 41 but max busn 46
During the initial scan, PCI core doesn't see the switch and since the Root
Port is not hot plug capable, the secondary bus number gets assigned as the
subordinate bus number. This means, the PCI core assumes that only one bus
will appear behind the Root Port since the Root Port is not hot plug
capable.
This works perfectly fine for PCIe endpoints connected to the Root Port,
since they don't extend the bus. However, if a PCIe switch is connected,
then there is a problem when the downstream busses starts showing up and
the PCI core doesn't extend the subordinate bus number after initial scan
during boot.
The long term plan is to migrate this driver to the pwrctrl framework,
once it adds proper support for powering up and enumerating PCIe switches.
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani(a)kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin(a)rock-chips.com>
Tested-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin(a)rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
index 60373fe1362f..e87ec6779d44 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
@@ -1958,10 +1958,6 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
- irq = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, "global");
- if (irq > 0)
- pp->use_linkup_irq = true;
-
ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "cannot initialize host\n");
@@ -1975,6 +1971,7 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err_host_deinit;
}
+ irq = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, "global");
if (irq > 0) {
ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
qcom_pcie_global_irq_thread,
--
2.52.0
This reverts commit 0e0b45ab5d770a748487ba0ae8f77d1fb0f0de3e.
While this fake hotplugging was a nice idea, it has shown that this feature
does not handle PCIe switches correctly:
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: can not insert [bus 43-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: [bus 43-41] end is updated to 43
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: can not insert [bus 43] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:00.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 43] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: can not insert [bus 44-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: [bus 44-41] end is updated to 44
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: can not insert [bus 44] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:02.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 44] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: can not insert [bus 45-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: [bus 45-41] end is updated to 45
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: can not insert [bus 45] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:06.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 45] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: can not insert [bus 46-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: [bus 46-41] end is updated to 46
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: can not insert [bus 46] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:0e.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 46] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:42: busn_res: [bus 42-41] end is updated to 46
pci_bus 0004:42: busn_res: can not insert [bus 42-46] under [bus 41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 41])
pci 0004:41:00.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 42-46] cannot be assigned for them
pcieport 0004:40:00.0: bridge has subordinate 41 but max busn 46
During the initial scan, PCI core doesn't see the switch and since the Root
Port is not hot plug capable, the secondary bus number gets assigned as the
subordinate bus number. This means, the PCI core assumes that only one bus
will appear behind the Root Port since the Root Port is not hot plug
capable.
This works perfectly fine for PCIe endpoints connected to the Root Port,
since they don't extend the bus. However, if a PCIe switch is connected,
then there is a problem when the downstream busses starts showing up and
the PCI core doesn't extend the subordinate bus number after initial scan
during boot.
The long term plan is to migrate this driver to the pwrctrl framework,
once it adds proper support for powering up and enumerating PCIe switches.
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani(a)kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin(a)rock-chips.com>
Tested-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin(a)rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 59 +------------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
index ca808d8f7975..352f513ebf03 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
@@ -508,34 +508,6 @@ static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
.get_ltssm = rockchip_pcie_get_ltssm,
};
-static irqreturn_t rockchip_pcie_rc_sys_irq_thread(int irq, void *arg)
-{
- struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = arg;
- struct dw_pcie *pci = &rockchip->pci;
- struct dw_pcie_rp *pp = &pci->pp;
- struct device *dev = pci->dev;
- u32 reg;
-
- reg = rockchip_pcie_readl_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MISC);
- rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, reg, PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MISC);
-
- dev_dbg(dev, "PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MISC: %#x\n", reg);
- dev_dbg(dev, "LTSSM_STATUS: %#x\n", rockchip_pcie_get_ltssm_reg(rockchip));
-
- if (reg & PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED) {
- if (rockchip_pcie_link_up(pci)) {
- msleep(PCIE_RESET_CONFIG_WAIT_MS);
- dev_dbg(dev, "Received Link up event. Starting enumeration!\n");
- /* Rescan the bus to enumerate endpoint devices */
- pci_lock_rescan_remove();
- pci_rescan_bus(pp->bridge->bus);
- pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
- }
- }
-
- return IRQ_HANDLED;
-}
-
static irqreturn_t rockchip_pcie_ep_sys_irq_thread(int irq, void *arg)
{
struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = arg;
@@ -568,29 +540,14 @@ static irqreturn_t rockchip_pcie_ep_sys_irq_thread(int irq, void *arg)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
-static int rockchip_pcie_configure_rc(struct platform_device *pdev,
- struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
+static int rockchip_pcie_configure_rc(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
{
- struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct dw_pcie_rp *pp;
- int irq, ret;
u32 val;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_ROCKCHIP_DW_HOST))
return -ENODEV;
- irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "sys");
- if (irq < 0)
- return irq;
-
- ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL,
- rockchip_pcie_rc_sys_irq_thread,
- IRQF_ONESHOT, "pcie-sys-rc", rockchip);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(dev, "failed to request PCIe sys IRQ\n");
- return ret;
- }
-
/* LTSSM enable control mode */
val = FIELD_PREP_WM16(PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE, 1);
rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, val, PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL);
@@ -602,17 +559,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_configure_rc(struct platform_device *pdev,
pp = &rockchip->pci.pp;
pp->ops = &rockchip_pcie_host_ops;
- ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(dev, "failed to initialize host\n");
- return ret;
- }
-
- /* unmask DLL up/down indicator */
- val = FIELD_PREP_WM16(PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED, 0);
- rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, val, PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_MISC);
-
- return ret;
+ return dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
}
static int rockchip_pcie_configure_ep(struct platform_device *pdev,
@@ -731,7 +678,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
switch (data->mode) {
case DW_PCIE_RC_TYPE:
- ret = rockchip_pcie_configure_rc(pdev, rockchip);
+ ret = rockchip_pcie_configure_rc(rockchip);
if (ret)
goto deinit_clk;
break;
--
2.52.0
This reverts commit ec9fd499b9c60a187ac8d6414c3c343c77d32e42.
While this fake hotplugging was a nice idea, it has shown that this feature
does not handle PCIe switches correctly:
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: can not insert [bus 43-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: [bus 43-41] end is updated to 43
pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: can not insert [bus 43] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:00.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 43] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: can not insert [bus 44-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: [bus 44-41] end is updated to 44
pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: can not insert [bus 44] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:02.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 44] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: can not insert [bus 45-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: [bus 45-41] end is updated to 45
pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: can not insert [bus 45] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:06.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 45] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: can not insert [bus 46-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: [bus 46-41] end is updated to 46
pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: can not insert [bus 46] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41])
pci 0004:42:0e.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 46] cannot be assigned for them
pci_bus 0004:42: busn_res: [bus 42-41] end is updated to 46
pci_bus 0004:42: busn_res: can not insert [bus 42-46] under [bus 41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 41])
pci 0004:41:00.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 42-46] cannot be assigned for them
pcieport 0004:40:00.0: bridge has subordinate 41 but max busn 46
During the initial scan, PCI core doesn't see the switch and since the Root
Port is not hot plug capable, the secondary bus number gets assigned as the
subordinate bus number. This means, the PCI core assumes that only one bus
will appear behind the Root Port since the Root Port is not hot plug
capable.
This works perfectly fine for PCIe endpoints connected to the Root Port,
since they don't extend the bus. However, if a PCIe switch is connected,
then there is a problem when the downstream busses starts showing up and
the PCI core doesn't extend the subordinate bus number after initial scan
during boot.
The long term plan is to migrate this driver to the pwrctrl framework,
once it adds proper support for powering up and enumerating PCIe switches.
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani(a)kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin(a)rock-chips.com>
Tested-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin(a)rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
index 8c1c92208802..ca808d8f7975 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
@@ -601,7 +601,6 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_configure_rc(struct platform_device *pdev,
pp = &rockchip->pci.pp;
pp->ops = &rockchip_pcie_host_ops;
- pp->use_linkup_irq = true;
ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
if (ret) {
--
2.52.0
If device_register() fails, put_device() should be called to drop
the device reference.
Thus add put_device() after subsys_unregister label and change
device_unregister() to device_del() in fail label.
Found by code review.
Fixes: 6c9d29095264 ("power: cmm - convert sysdev_class to a regular subsystem")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Haoxiang Li <lihaoxiang(a)isrc.iscas.ac.cn>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/cmm.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/cmm.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/cmm.c
index 4cbbe2ee58ab..0666d3300bdb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/cmm.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/cmm.c
@@ -419,8 +419,9 @@ static int cmm_sysfs_register(struct device *dev)
fail:
while (--i >= 0)
device_remove_file(dev, cmm_attrs[i]);
- device_unregister(dev);
+ device_del(dev);
subsys_unregister:
+ put_device(dev);
bus_unregister(&cmm_subsys);
return rc;
}
--
2.25.1