- Linux-stable-mirror - lists.linaro.org

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] iio: imu: inv_icm42600: Avoid configuring if already" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.12.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 466f7a2fef2a4e426f809f79845a1ec1aeb558f4 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025101623-attractor-shopper-b67e@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.12.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 466f7a2fef2a4e426f809f79845a1ec1aeb558f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sean Nyekjaer <sean(a)geanix.com> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 09:49:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] iio: imu: inv_icm42600: Avoid configuring if already pm_runtime suspended Do as in suspend, skip resume configuration steps if the device is already pm_runtime suspended. This avoids reconfiguring a device that is already in the correct low-power state and ensures that pm_runtime handles the power state transitions properly. Fixes: 31c24c1e93c3 ("iio: imu: inv_icm42600: add core of new inv_icm42600 driver") Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean(a)geanix.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250901-icm42pmreg-v3-3-ef1336246960@geanix.com Cc: <Stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron(a)huawei.com> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_core.c index 41b275ecc7e2..ee780f530dc8 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_core.c +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_core.c @@ -837,17 +837,15 @@ static int inv_icm42600_suspend(struct device *dev) struct device *accel_dev; bool wakeup; int accel_conf; - int ret; + int ret = 0; mutex_lock(&st->lock); st->suspended.gyro = st->conf.gyro.mode; st->suspended.accel = st->conf.accel.mode; st->suspended.temp = st->conf.temp_en; - if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) { - ret = 0; + if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) goto out_unlock; - } /* disable FIFO data streaming */ if (st->fifo.on) { @@ -900,10 +898,13 @@ static int inv_icm42600_resume(struct device *dev) struct inv_icm42600_sensor_state *accel_st = iio_priv(st->indio_accel); struct device *accel_dev; bool wakeup; - int ret; + int ret = 0; mutex_lock(&st->lock); + if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) + goto out_unlock; + /* check wakeup capability */ accel_dev = &st->indio_accel->dev; wakeup = st->apex.on && device_may_wakeup(accel_dev);

2 days, 22 hours

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] iio: imu: inv_icm42600: Avoid configuring if already" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 466f7a2fef2a4e426f809f79845a1ec1aeb558f4 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025101623-clarify-manhood-adaa@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 466f7a2fef2a4e426f809f79845a1ec1aeb558f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sean Nyekjaer <sean(a)geanix.com> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 09:49:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] iio: imu: inv_icm42600: Avoid configuring if already pm_runtime suspended Do as in suspend, skip resume configuration steps if the device is already pm_runtime suspended. This avoids reconfiguring a device that is already in the correct low-power state and ensures that pm_runtime handles the power state transitions properly. Fixes: 31c24c1e93c3 ("iio: imu: inv_icm42600: add core of new inv_icm42600 driver") Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean(a)geanix.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250901-icm42pmreg-v3-3-ef1336246960@geanix.com Cc: <Stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron(a)huawei.com> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_core.c index 41b275ecc7e2..ee780f530dc8 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_core.c +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_core.c @@ -837,17 +837,15 @@ static int inv_icm42600_suspend(struct device *dev) struct device *accel_dev; bool wakeup; int accel_conf; - int ret; + int ret = 0; mutex_lock(&st->lock); st->suspended.gyro = st->conf.gyro.mode; st->suspended.accel = st->conf.accel.mode; st->suspended.temp = st->conf.temp_en; - if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) { - ret = 0; + if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) goto out_unlock; - } /* disable FIFO data streaming */ if (st->fifo.on) { @@ -900,10 +898,13 @@ static int inv_icm42600_resume(struct device *dev) struct inv_icm42600_sensor_state *accel_st = iio_priv(st->indio_accel); struct device *accel_dev; bool wakeup; - int ret; + int ret = 0; mutex_lock(&st->lock); + if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) + goto out_unlock; + /* check wakeup capability */ accel_dev = &st->indio_accel->dev; wakeup = st->apex.on && device_may_wakeup(accel_dev);

2 days, 22 hours

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] iio: imu: inv_icm42600: Avoid configuring if already" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 466f7a2fef2a4e426f809f79845a1ec1aeb558f4 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025101623-dry-crummiest-15b3@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 466f7a2fef2a4e426f809f79845a1ec1aeb558f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sean Nyekjaer <sean(a)geanix.com> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 09:49:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] iio: imu: inv_icm42600: Avoid configuring if already pm_runtime suspended Do as in suspend, skip resume configuration steps if the device is already pm_runtime suspended. This avoids reconfiguring a device that is already in the correct low-power state and ensures that pm_runtime handles the power state transitions properly. Fixes: 31c24c1e93c3 ("iio: imu: inv_icm42600: add core of new inv_icm42600 driver") Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean(a)geanix.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250901-icm42pmreg-v3-3-ef1336246960@geanix.com Cc: <Stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron(a)huawei.com> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_core.c index 41b275ecc7e2..ee780f530dc8 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_core.c +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_core.c @@ -837,17 +837,15 @@ static int inv_icm42600_suspend(struct device *dev) struct device *accel_dev; bool wakeup; int accel_conf; - int ret; + int ret = 0; mutex_lock(&st->lock); st->suspended.gyro = st->conf.gyro.mode; st->suspended.accel = st->conf.accel.mode; st->suspended.temp = st->conf.temp_en; - if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) { - ret = 0; + if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) goto out_unlock; - } /* disable FIFO data streaming */ if (st->fifo.on) { @@ -900,10 +898,13 @@ static int inv_icm42600_resume(struct device *dev) struct inv_icm42600_sensor_state *accel_st = iio_priv(st->indio_accel); struct device *accel_dev; bool wakeup; - int ret; + int ret = 0; mutex_lock(&st->lock); + if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) + goto out_unlock; + /* check wakeup capability */ accel_dev = &st->indio_accel->dev; wakeup = st->apex.on && device_may_wakeup(accel_dev);

2 days, 22 hours

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] fuse: fix livelock in synchronous file put from fuseblk" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 26e5c67deb2e1f42a951f022fdf5b9f7eb747b01 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025101631-recount-smashing-e39c@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 26e5c67deb2e1f42a951f022fdf5b9f7eb747b01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong(a)kernel.org> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 17:24:17 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] fuse: fix livelock in synchronous file put from fuseblk workers I observed a hang when running generic/323 against a fuseblk server. This test opens a file, initiates a lot of AIO writes to that file descriptor, and closes the file descriptor before the writes complete. Unsurprisingly, the AIO exerciser threads are mostly stuck waiting for responses from the fuseblk server: # cat /proc/372265/task/372313/stack [<0>] request_wait_answer+0x1fe/0x2a0 [fuse] [<0>] __fuse_simple_request+0xd3/0x2b0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_do_getattr+0xfc/0x1f0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_file_read_iter+0xbe/0x1c0 [fuse] [<0>] aio_read+0x130/0x1e0 [<0>] io_submit_one+0x542/0x860 [<0>] __x64_sys_io_submit+0x98/0x1a0 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x37/0xf0 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 But the /weird/ part is that the fuseblk server threads are waiting for responses from itself: # cat /proc/372210/task/372232/stack [<0>] request_wait_answer+0x1fe/0x2a0 [fuse] [<0>] __fuse_simple_request+0xd3/0x2b0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_file_put+0x9a/0xd0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_release+0x36/0x50 [fuse] [<0>] __fput+0xec/0x2b0 [<0>] task_work_run+0x55/0x90 [<0>] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xe9/0x100 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x43/0xf0 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 The fuseblk server is fuse2fs so there's nothing all that exciting in the server itself. So why is the fuse server calling fuse_file_put? The commit message for the fstest sheds some light on that: "By closing the file descriptor before calling io_destroy, you pretty much guarantee that the last put on the ioctx will be done in interrupt context (during I/O completion). Aha. AIO fgets a new struct file from the fd when it queues the ioctx. The completion of the FUSE_WRITE command from userspace causes the fuse server to call the AIO completion function. The completion puts the struct file, queuing a delayed fput to the fuse server task. When the fuse server task returns to userspace, it has to run the delayed fput, which in the case of a fuseblk server, it does synchronously. Sending the FUSE_RELEASE command sychronously from fuse server threads is a bad idea because a client program can initiate enough simultaneous AIOs such that all the fuse server threads end up in delayed_fput, and now there aren't any threads left to handle the queued fuse commands. Fix this by only using asynchronous fputs when closing files, and leave a comment explaining why. Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # v2.6.38 Fixes: 5a18ec176c934c ("fuse: fix hang of single threaded fuseblk filesystem") Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi(a)redhat.com> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c index 54786f62a9d8..f1ef77a0be05 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/file.c +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c @@ -356,8 +356,14 @@ void fuse_file_release(struct inode *inode, struct fuse_file *ff, * Make the release synchronous if this is a fuseblk mount, * synchronous RELEASE is allowed (and desirable) in this case * because the server can be trusted not to screw up. + * + * Always use the asynchronous file put because the current thread + * might be the fuse server. This can happen if a process starts some + * aio and closes the fd before the aio completes. Since aio takes its + * own ref to the file, the IO completion has to drop the ref, which is + * how the fuse server can end up closing its clients' files. */ - fuse_file_put(ff, ff->fm->fc->destroy); + fuse_file_put(ff, false); } void fuse_release_common(struct file *file, bool isdir)

2 days, 22 hours

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] fuse: fix livelock in synchronous file put from fuseblk" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 26e5c67deb2e1f42a951f022fdf5b9f7eb747b01 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025101630-unvaried-protector-cae4@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 26e5c67deb2e1f42a951f022fdf5b9f7eb747b01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong(a)kernel.org> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 17:24:17 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] fuse: fix livelock in synchronous file put from fuseblk workers I observed a hang when running generic/323 against a fuseblk server. This test opens a file, initiates a lot of AIO writes to that file descriptor, and closes the file descriptor before the writes complete. Unsurprisingly, the AIO exerciser threads are mostly stuck waiting for responses from the fuseblk server: # cat /proc/372265/task/372313/stack [<0>] request_wait_answer+0x1fe/0x2a0 [fuse] [<0>] __fuse_simple_request+0xd3/0x2b0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_do_getattr+0xfc/0x1f0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_file_read_iter+0xbe/0x1c0 [fuse] [<0>] aio_read+0x130/0x1e0 [<0>] io_submit_one+0x542/0x860 [<0>] __x64_sys_io_submit+0x98/0x1a0 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x37/0xf0 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 But the /weird/ part is that the fuseblk server threads are waiting for responses from itself: # cat /proc/372210/task/372232/stack [<0>] request_wait_answer+0x1fe/0x2a0 [fuse] [<0>] __fuse_simple_request+0xd3/0x2b0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_file_put+0x9a/0xd0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_release+0x36/0x50 [fuse] [<0>] __fput+0xec/0x2b0 [<0>] task_work_run+0x55/0x90 [<0>] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xe9/0x100 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x43/0xf0 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 The fuseblk server is fuse2fs so there's nothing all that exciting in the server itself. So why is the fuse server calling fuse_file_put? The commit message for the fstest sheds some light on that: "By closing the file descriptor before calling io_destroy, you pretty much guarantee that the last put on the ioctx will be done in interrupt context (during I/O completion). Aha. AIO fgets a new struct file from the fd when it queues the ioctx. The completion of the FUSE_WRITE command from userspace causes the fuse server to call the AIO completion function. The completion puts the struct file, queuing a delayed fput to the fuse server task. When the fuse server task returns to userspace, it has to run the delayed fput, which in the case of a fuseblk server, it does synchronously. Sending the FUSE_RELEASE command sychronously from fuse server threads is a bad idea because a client program can initiate enough simultaneous AIOs such that all the fuse server threads end up in delayed_fput, and now there aren't any threads left to handle the queued fuse commands. Fix this by only using asynchronous fputs when closing files, and leave a comment explaining why. Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # v2.6.38 Fixes: 5a18ec176c934c ("fuse: fix hang of single threaded fuseblk filesystem") Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi(a)redhat.com> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c index 54786f62a9d8..f1ef77a0be05 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/file.c +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c @@ -356,8 +356,14 @@ void fuse_file_release(struct inode *inode, struct fuse_file *ff, * Make the release synchronous if this is a fuseblk mount, * synchronous RELEASE is allowed (and desirable) in this case * because the server can be trusted not to screw up. + * + * Always use the asynchronous file put because the current thread + * might be the fuse server. This can happen if a process starts some + * aio and closes the fd before the aio completes. Since aio takes its + * own ref to the file, the IO completion has to drop the ref, which is + * how the fuse server can end up closing its clients' files. */ - fuse_file_put(ff, ff->fm->fc->destroy); + fuse_file_put(ff, false); } void fuse_release_common(struct file *file, bool isdir)

2 days, 22 hours

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] fuse: fix livelock in synchronous file put from fuseblk" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 26e5c67deb2e1f42a951f022fdf5b9f7eb747b01 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025101629-privacy-morally-5172@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 26e5c67deb2e1f42a951f022fdf5b9f7eb747b01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong(a)kernel.org> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 17:24:17 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] fuse: fix livelock in synchronous file put from fuseblk workers I observed a hang when running generic/323 against a fuseblk server. This test opens a file, initiates a lot of AIO writes to that file descriptor, and closes the file descriptor before the writes complete. Unsurprisingly, the AIO exerciser threads are mostly stuck waiting for responses from the fuseblk server: # cat /proc/372265/task/372313/stack [<0>] request_wait_answer+0x1fe/0x2a0 [fuse] [<0>] __fuse_simple_request+0xd3/0x2b0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_do_getattr+0xfc/0x1f0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_file_read_iter+0xbe/0x1c0 [fuse] [<0>] aio_read+0x130/0x1e0 [<0>] io_submit_one+0x542/0x860 [<0>] __x64_sys_io_submit+0x98/0x1a0 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x37/0xf0 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 But the /weird/ part is that the fuseblk server threads are waiting for responses from itself: # cat /proc/372210/task/372232/stack [<0>] request_wait_answer+0x1fe/0x2a0 [fuse] [<0>] __fuse_simple_request+0xd3/0x2b0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_file_put+0x9a/0xd0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_release+0x36/0x50 [fuse] [<0>] __fput+0xec/0x2b0 [<0>] task_work_run+0x55/0x90 [<0>] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xe9/0x100 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x43/0xf0 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 The fuseblk server is fuse2fs so there's nothing all that exciting in the server itself. So why is the fuse server calling fuse_file_put? The commit message for the fstest sheds some light on that: "By closing the file descriptor before calling io_destroy, you pretty much guarantee that the last put on the ioctx will be done in interrupt context (during I/O completion). Aha. AIO fgets a new struct file from the fd when it queues the ioctx. The completion of the FUSE_WRITE command from userspace causes the fuse server to call the AIO completion function. The completion puts the struct file, queuing a delayed fput to the fuse server task. When the fuse server task returns to userspace, it has to run the delayed fput, which in the case of a fuseblk server, it does synchronously. Sending the FUSE_RELEASE command sychronously from fuse server threads is a bad idea because a client program can initiate enough simultaneous AIOs such that all the fuse server threads end up in delayed_fput, and now there aren't any threads left to handle the queued fuse commands. Fix this by only using asynchronous fputs when closing files, and leave a comment explaining why. Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # v2.6.38 Fixes: 5a18ec176c934c ("fuse: fix hang of single threaded fuseblk filesystem") Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi(a)redhat.com> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c index 54786f62a9d8..f1ef77a0be05 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/file.c +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c @@ -356,8 +356,14 @@ void fuse_file_release(struct inode *inode, struct fuse_file *ff, * Make the release synchronous if this is a fuseblk mount, * synchronous RELEASE is allowed (and desirable) in this case * because the server can be trusted not to screw up. + * + * Always use the asynchronous file put because the current thread + * might be the fuse server. This can happen if a process starts some + * aio and closes the fd before the aio completes. Since aio takes its + * own ref to the file, the IO completion has to drop the ref, which is + * how the fuse server can end up closing its clients' files. */ - fuse_file_put(ff, ff->fm->fc->destroy); + fuse_file_put(ff, false); } void fuse_release_common(struct file *file, bool isdir)

2 days, 22 hours

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] fuse: fix livelock in synchronous file put from fuseblk" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 26e5c67deb2e1f42a951f022fdf5b9f7eb747b01 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025101628-exclude-hamstring-8d43@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 26e5c67deb2e1f42a951f022fdf5b9f7eb747b01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong(a)kernel.org> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 17:24:17 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] fuse: fix livelock in synchronous file put from fuseblk workers I observed a hang when running generic/323 against a fuseblk server. This test opens a file, initiates a lot of AIO writes to that file descriptor, and closes the file descriptor before the writes complete. Unsurprisingly, the AIO exerciser threads are mostly stuck waiting for responses from the fuseblk server: # cat /proc/372265/task/372313/stack [<0>] request_wait_answer+0x1fe/0x2a0 [fuse] [<0>] __fuse_simple_request+0xd3/0x2b0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_do_getattr+0xfc/0x1f0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_file_read_iter+0xbe/0x1c0 [fuse] [<0>] aio_read+0x130/0x1e0 [<0>] io_submit_one+0x542/0x860 [<0>] __x64_sys_io_submit+0x98/0x1a0 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x37/0xf0 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 But the /weird/ part is that the fuseblk server threads are waiting for responses from itself: # cat /proc/372210/task/372232/stack [<0>] request_wait_answer+0x1fe/0x2a0 [fuse] [<0>] __fuse_simple_request+0xd3/0x2b0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_file_put+0x9a/0xd0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_release+0x36/0x50 [fuse] [<0>] __fput+0xec/0x2b0 [<0>] task_work_run+0x55/0x90 [<0>] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xe9/0x100 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x43/0xf0 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 The fuseblk server is fuse2fs so there's nothing all that exciting in the server itself. So why is the fuse server calling fuse_file_put? The commit message for the fstest sheds some light on that: "By closing the file descriptor before calling io_destroy, you pretty much guarantee that the last put on the ioctx will be done in interrupt context (during I/O completion). Aha. AIO fgets a new struct file from the fd when it queues the ioctx. The completion of the FUSE_WRITE command from userspace causes the fuse server to call the AIO completion function. The completion puts the struct file, queuing a delayed fput to the fuse server task. When the fuse server task returns to userspace, it has to run the delayed fput, which in the case of a fuseblk server, it does synchronously. Sending the FUSE_RELEASE command sychronously from fuse server threads is a bad idea because a client program can initiate enough simultaneous AIOs such that all the fuse server threads end up in delayed_fput, and now there aren't any threads left to handle the queued fuse commands. Fix this by only using asynchronous fputs when closing files, and leave a comment explaining why. Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # v2.6.38 Fixes: 5a18ec176c934c ("fuse: fix hang of single threaded fuseblk filesystem") Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi(a)redhat.com> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c index 54786f62a9d8..f1ef77a0be05 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/file.c +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c @@ -356,8 +356,14 @@ void fuse_file_release(struct inode *inode, struct fuse_file *ff, * Make the release synchronous if this is a fuseblk mount, * synchronous RELEASE is allowed (and desirable) in this case * because the server can be trusted not to screw up. + * + * Always use the asynchronous file put because the current thread + * might be the fuse server. This can happen if a process starts some + * aio and closes the fd before the aio completes. Since aio takes its + * own ref to the file, the IO completion has to drop the ref, which is + * how the fuse server can end up closing its clients' files. */ - fuse_file_put(ff, ff->fm->fc->destroy); + fuse_file_put(ff, false); } void fuse_release_common(struct file *file, bool isdir)

2 days, 22 hours

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] fuse: fix livelock in synchronous file put from fuseblk" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 26e5c67deb2e1f42a951f022fdf5b9f7eb747b01 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025101627-calzone-emperor-7442@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 26e5c67deb2e1f42a951f022fdf5b9f7eb747b01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong(a)kernel.org> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 17:24:17 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] fuse: fix livelock in synchronous file put from fuseblk workers I observed a hang when running generic/323 against a fuseblk server. This test opens a file, initiates a lot of AIO writes to that file descriptor, and closes the file descriptor before the writes complete. Unsurprisingly, the AIO exerciser threads are mostly stuck waiting for responses from the fuseblk server: # cat /proc/372265/task/372313/stack [<0>] request_wait_answer+0x1fe/0x2a0 [fuse] [<0>] __fuse_simple_request+0xd3/0x2b0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_do_getattr+0xfc/0x1f0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_file_read_iter+0xbe/0x1c0 [fuse] [<0>] aio_read+0x130/0x1e0 [<0>] io_submit_one+0x542/0x860 [<0>] __x64_sys_io_submit+0x98/0x1a0 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x37/0xf0 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 But the /weird/ part is that the fuseblk server threads are waiting for responses from itself: # cat /proc/372210/task/372232/stack [<0>] request_wait_answer+0x1fe/0x2a0 [fuse] [<0>] __fuse_simple_request+0xd3/0x2b0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_file_put+0x9a/0xd0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_release+0x36/0x50 [fuse] [<0>] __fput+0xec/0x2b0 [<0>] task_work_run+0x55/0x90 [<0>] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xe9/0x100 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x43/0xf0 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 The fuseblk server is fuse2fs so there's nothing all that exciting in the server itself. So why is the fuse server calling fuse_file_put? The commit message for the fstest sheds some light on that: "By closing the file descriptor before calling io_destroy, you pretty much guarantee that the last put on the ioctx will be done in interrupt context (during I/O completion). Aha. AIO fgets a new struct file from the fd when it queues the ioctx. The completion of the FUSE_WRITE command from userspace causes the fuse server to call the AIO completion function. The completion puts the struct file, queuing a delayed fput to the fuse server task. When the fuse server task returns to userspace, it has to run the delayed fput, which in the case of a fuseblk server, it does synchronously. Sending the FUSE_RELEASE command sychronously from fuse server threads is a bad idea because a client program can initiate enough simultaneous AIOs such that all the fuse server threads end up in delayed_fput, and now there aren't any threads left to handle the queued fuse commands. Fix this by only using asynchronous fputs when closing files, and leave a comment explaining why. Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # v2.6.38 Fixes: 5a18ec176c934c ("fuse: fix hang of single threaded fuseblk filesystem") Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi(a)redhat.com> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c index 54786f62a9d8..f1ef77a0be05 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/file.c +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c @@ -356,8 +356,14 @@ void fuse_file_release(struct inode *inode, struct fuse_file *ff, * Make the release synchronous if this is a fuseblk mount, * synchronous RELEASE is allowed (and desirable) in this case * because the server can be trusted not to screw up. + * + * Always use the asynchronous file put because the current thread + * might be the fuse server. This can happen if a process starts some + * aio and closes the fd before the aio completes. Since aio takes its + * own ref to the file, the IO completion has to drop the ref, which is + * how the fuse server can end up closing its clients' files. */ - fuse_file_put(ff, ff->fm->fc->destroy); + fuse_file_put(ff, false); } void fuse_release_common(struct file *file, bool isdir)

2 days, 22 hours

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] fs: quota: create dedicated workqueue for quota_release_work" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 72b7ceca857f38a8ca7c5629feffc63769638974 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025101653-unloved-prodigal-b5e0@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 72b7ceca857f38a8ca7c5629feffc63769638974 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shashank A P <shashank.ap(a)samsung.com> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 14:59:00 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] fs: quota: create dedicated workqueue for quota_release_work There is a kernel panic due to WARN_ONCE when panic_on_warn is set. This issue occurs when writeback is triggered due to sync call for an opened file(ie, writeback reason is WB_REASON_SYNC). When f2fs balance is needed at sync path, flush for quota_release_work is triggered. By default quota_release_work is queued to "events_unbound" queue which does not have WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag. During f2fs balance "writeback" workqueue tries to flush quota_release_work causing kernel panic due to MEM_RECLAIM flag mismatch errors. This patch creates dedicated workqueue with WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag for work quota_release_work. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 14867 at kernel/workqueue.c:3721 check_flush_dependency+0x13c/0x148 Call trace: check_flush_dependency+0x13c/0x148 __flush_work+0xd0/0x398 flush_delayed_work+0x44/0x5c dquot_writeback_dquots+0x54/0x318 f2fs_do_quota_sync+0xb8/0x1a8 f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x3cc/0x99c f2fs_gc+0x190/0x750 f2fs_balance_fs+0x110/0x168 f2fs_write_single_data_page+0x474/0x7dc f2fs_write_data_pages+0x7d0/0xd0c do_writepages+0xe0/0x2f4 __writeback_single_inode+0x44/0x4ac writeback_sb_inodes+0x30c/0x538 wb_writeback+0xf4/0x440 wb_workfn+0x128/0x5d4 process_scheduled_works+0x1c4/0x45c worker_thread+0x32c/0x3e8 kthread+0x11c/0x1b0 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Kernel panic - not syncing: kernel: panic_on_warn set ... Fixes: ac6f420291b3 ("quota: flush quota_release_work upon quota writeback") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Shashank A P <shashank.ap(a)samsung.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250901092905.2115-1-shashank.ap@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> diff --git a/fs/quota/dquot.c b/fs/quota/dquot.c index df4a9b348769..6c4a6ee1fa2b 100644 --- a/fs/quota/dquot.c +++ b/fs/quota/dquot.c @@ -162,6 +162,9 @@ static struct quota_module_name module_names[] = INIT_QUOTA_MODULE_NAMES; /* SLAB cache for dquot structures */ static struct kmem_cache *dquot_cachep; +/* workqueue for work quota_release_work*/ +static struct workqueue_struct *quota_unbound_wq; + void register_quota_format(struct quota_format_type *fmt) { spin_lock(&dq_list_lock); @@ -881,7 +884,7 @@ void dqput(struct dquot *dquot) put_releasing_dquots(dquot); atomic_dec(&dquot->dq_count); spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock); - queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &quota_release_work, 1); + queue_delayed_work(quota_unbound_wq, &quota_release_work, 1); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(dqput); @@ -3041,6 +3044,11 @@ static int __init dquot_init(void) shrinker_register(dqcache_shrinker); + quota_unbound_wq = alloc_workqueue("quota_events_unbound", + WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, WQ_MAX_ACTIVE); + if (!quota_unbound_wq) + panic("Cannot create quota_unbound_wq\n"); + return 0; } fs_initcall(dquot_init);

2 days, 22 hours

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] fs: quota: create dedicated workqueue for quota_release_work" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 72b7ceca857f38a8ca7c5629feffc63769638974 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025101652-coziness-jailer-d369@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 72b7ceca857f38a8ca7c5629feffc63769638974 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shashank A P <shashank.ap(a)samsung.com> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 14:59:00 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] fs: quota: create dedicated workqueue for quota_release_work There is a kernel panic due to WARN_ONCE when panic_on_warn is set. This issue occurs when writeback is triggered due to sync call for an opened file(ie, writeback reason is WB_REASON_SYNC). When f2fs balance is needed at sync path, flush for quota_release_work is triggered. By default quota_release_work is queued to "events_unbound" queue which does not have WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag. During f2fs balance "writeback" workqueue tries to flush quota_release_work causing kernel panic due to MEM_RECLAIM flag mismatch errors. This patch creates dedicated workqueue with WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag for work quota_release_work. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 14867 at kernel/workqueue.c:3721 check_flush_dependency+0x13c/0x148 Call trace: check_flush_dependency+0x13c/0x148 __flush_work+0xd0/0x398 flush_delayed_work+0x44/0x5c dquot_writeback_dquots+0x54/0x318 f2fs_do_quota_sync+0xb8/0x1a8 f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x3cc/0x99c f2fs_gc+0x190/0x750 f2fs_balance_fs+0x110/0x168 f2fs_write_single_data_page+0x474/0x7dc f2fs_write_data_pages+0x7d0/0xd0c do_writepages+0xe0/0x2f4 __writeback_single_inode+0x44/0x4ac writeback_sb_inodes+0x30c/0x538 wb_writeback+0xf4/0x440 wb_workfn+0x128/0x5d4 process_scheduled_works+0x1c4/0x45c worker_thread+0x32c/0x3e8 kthread+0x11c/0x1b0 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Kernel panic - not syncing: kernel: panic_on_warn set ... Fixes: ac6f420291b3 ("quota: flush quota_release_work upon quota writeback") CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Shashank A P <shashank.ap(a)samsung.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250901092905.2115-1-shashank.ap@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> diff --git a/fs/quota/dquot.c b/fs/quota/dquot.c index df4a9b348769..6c4a6ee1fa2b 100644 --- a/fs/quota/dquot.c +++ b/fs/quota/dquot.c @@ -162,6 +162,9 @@ static struct quota_module_name module_names[] = INIT_QUOTA_MODULE_NAMES; /* SLAB cache for dquot structures */ static struct kmem_cache *dquot_cachep; +/* workqueue for work quota_release_work*/ +static struct workqueue_struct *quota_unbound_wq; + void register_quota_format(struct quota_format_type *fmt) { spin_lock(&dq_list_lock); @@ -881,7 +884,7 @@ void dqput(struct dquot *dquot) put_releasing_dquots(dquot); atomic_dec(&dquot->dq_count); spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock); - queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &quota_release_work, 1); + queue_delayed_work(quota_unbound_wq, &quota_release_work, 1); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(dqput); @@ -3041,6 +3044,11 @@ static int __init dquot_init(void) shrinker_register(dqcache_shrinker); + quota_unbound_wq = alloc_workqueue("quota_events_unbound", + WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, WQ_MAX_ACTIVE); + if (!quota_unbound_wq) + panic("Cannot create quota_unbound_wq\n"); + return 0; } fs_initcall(dquot_init);

2 days, 22 hours

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror