- Linux-stable-mirror - lists.linaro.org

[tip: x86/urgent] selftests/x86: Add a test to detect infinite SIGTRAP handler loop

by tip-bot2 for Xin Li (Intel)

The following commit has been merged into the x86/urgent branch of tip: Commit-ID: f287822688eeb44ae1cf6ac45701d965efc33218 Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/f287822688eeb44ae1cf6ac45701d965efc33218 Author: Xin Li (Intel) <xin(a)zytor.com> AuthorDate: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 01:40:54 -07:00 Committer: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen(a)linux.intel.com> CommitterDate: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 08:52:06 -07:00 selftests/x86: Add a test to detect infinite SIGTRAP handler loop When FRED is enabled, if the Trap Flag (TF) is set without an external debugger attached, it can lead to an infinite loop in the SIGTRAP handler. To avoid this, the software event flag in the augmented SS must be cleared, ensuring that no single-step trap remains pending when ERETU completes. This test checks for that specific scenario—verifying whether the kernel correctly prevents an infinite SIGTRAP loop in this edge case when FRED is enabled. The test should _always_ pass with IDT event delivery, thus no need to disable the test even when FRED is not enabled. Signed-off-by: Xin Li (Intel) <xin(a)zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen(a)linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta(a)intel.com> Cc:stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250609084054.2083189-3-xin%40zytor.com --- tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigtrap_loop.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigtrap_loop.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile index f703fcf..8314887 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ CAN_BUILD_WITH_NOPIE := $(shell ./check_cc.sh "$(CC)" trivial_program.c -no-pie) TARGETS_C_BOTHBITS := single_step_syscall sysret_ss_attrs syscall_nt test_mremap_vdso \ check_initial_reg_state sigreturn iopl ioperm \ - test_vsyscall mov_ss_trap \ + test_vsyscall mov_ss_trap sigtrap_loop \ syscall_arg_fault fsgsbase_restore sigaltstack TARGETS_C_BOTHBITS += nx_stack TARGETS_C_32BIT_ONLY := entry_from_vm86 test_syscall_vdso unwind_vdso \ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigtrap_loop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigtrap_loop.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9d06547 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigtrap_loop.c @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Copyright (C) 2025 Intel Corporation + */ +#define _GNU_SOURCE + +#include <err.h> +#include <signal.h> +#include <stdio.h> +#include <stdlib.h> +#include <string.h> +#include <sys/ucontext.h> + +#ifdef __x86_64__ +# define REG_IP REG_RIP +#else +# define REG_IP REG_EIP +#endif + +static void sethandler(int sig, void (*handler)(int, siginfo_t *, void *), int flags) +{ + struct sigaction sa; + + memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(sa)); + sa.sa_sigaction = handler; + sa.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO | flags; + sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask); + + if (sigaction(sig, &sa, 0)) + err(1, "sigaction"); + + return; +} + +static void sigtrap(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *ctx_void) +{ + ucontext_t *ctx = (ucontext_t *)ctx_void; + static unsigned int loop_count_on_same_ip; + static unsigned long last_trap_ip; + + if (last_trap_ip == ctx->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_IP]) { + printf("\tTrapped at %016lx\n", last_trap_ip); + + /* + * If the same IP is hit more than 10 times in a row, it is + * _considered_ an infinite loop. + */ + if (++loop_count_on_same_ip > 10) { + printf("[FAIL]\tDetected SIGTRAP infinite loop\n"); + exit(1); + } + + return; + } + + loop_count_on_same_ip = 0; + last_trap_ip = ctx->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_IP]; + printf("\tTrapped at %016lx\n", last_trap_ip); +} + +int main(int argc, char *argv[]) +{ + sethandler(SIGTRAP, sigtrap, 0); + + /* + * Set the Trap Flag (TF) to single-step the test code, therefore to + * trigger a SIGTRAP signal after each instruction until the TF is + * cleared. + * + * Because the arithmetic flags are not significant here, the TF is + * set by pushing 0x302 onto the stack and then popping it into the + * flags register. + * + * Four instructions in the following asm code are executed with the + * TF set, thus the SIGTRAP handler is expected to run four times. + */ + printf("[RUN]\tSIGTRAP infinite loop detection\n"); + asm volatile( +#ifdef __x86_64__ + /* + * Avoid clobbering the redzone + * + * Equivalent to "sub $128, %rsp", however -128 can be encoded + * in a single byte immediate while 128 uses 4 bytes. + */ + "add $-128, %rsp\n\t" +#endif + "push $0x302\n\t" + "popf\n\t" + "nop\n\t" + "nop\n\t" + "push $0x202\n\t" + "popf\n\t" +#ifdef __x86_64__ + "sub $-128, %rsp\n\t" +#endif + ); + + printf("[OK]\tNo SIGTRAP infinite loop detected\n"); + return 0; +}

3 weeks, 5 days

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v2] mmc: core: sd: Apply BROKEN_SD_DISCARD quirk earlier

by Avri Altman

Move the BROKEN_SD_DISCARD quirk for certain SanDisk SD cards from the `mmc_blk_fixups[]` to `mmc_sd_fixups[]`. This ensures the quirk is applied earlier in the device initialization process, aligning with the reasoning in [1]. Applying the quirk sooner prevents the kernel from incorrectly enabling discard support on affected cards during initial setup. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240820230631.GA436523@sony.com Fixes: 07d2872bf4c8 ("mmc: core: Add SD card quirk for broken discard") Signed-off-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman(a)sandisk.com> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org --- Changes in v2: - rebase on latest next --- drivers/mmc/core/quirks.h | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/quirks.h b/drivers/mmc/core/quirks.h index 7f893bafaa60..c417ed34c057 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/quirks.h +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/quirks.h @@ -44,6 +44,12 @@ static const struct mmc_fixup __maybe_unused mmc_sd_fixups[] = { 0, -1ull, SDIO_ANY_ID, SDIO_ANY_ID, add_quirk_sd, MMC_QUIRK_NO_UHS_DDR50_TUNING, EXT_CSD_REV_ANY), + /* + * Some SD cards reports discard support while they don't + */ + MMC_FIXUP(CID_NAME_ANY, CID_MANFID_SANDISK_SD, 0x5344, add_quirk_sd, + MMC_QUIRK_BROKEN_SD_DISCARD), + END_FIXUP }; @@ -147,12 +153,6 @@ static const struct mmc_fixup __maybe_unused mmc_blk_fixups[] = { MMC_FIXUP("M62704", CID_MANFID_KINGSTON, 0x0100, add_quirk_mmc, MMC_QUIRK_TRIM_BROKEN), - /* - * Some SD cards reports discard support while they don't - */ - MMC_FIXUP(CID_NAME_ANY, CID_MANFID_SANDISK_SD, 0x5344, add_quirk_sd, - MMC_QUIRK_BROKEN_SD_DISCARD), - END_FIXUP }; -- 2.25.1

3 weeks, 5 days

2
1
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 1/7] md/md-bitmap: fix dm-raid max_write_behind setting

by Sasha Levin

From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> [ Upstream commit 2afe17794cfed5f80295b1b9facd66e6f65e5002 ] It's supposed to be COUNTER_MAX / 2, not COUNTER_MAX. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/20250524061320.370630-14-yukuai1@huaweic… Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- Now I have a clear understanding. Let me analyze the specific code change in the commit: **YES** This commit should be backported to stable kernel trees. Here's my extensive analysis: ## Analysis of the Bug Fix ### 1. The Bug The code in `md_bitmap_new_disk_sb()` incorrectly validates `write_behind` against `COUNTER_MAX` instead of `COUNTER_MAX / 2`: ```c - if (write_behind > COUNTER_MAX) + if (write_behind > COUNTER_MAX / 2) write_behind = COUNTER_MAX / 2; ``` ### 2. Why This is a Real Bug The comment immediately above this code explicitly states: ```c /* - FIXME: write_behind for RAID1. If not specified, what - is a good choice? We choose COUNTER_MAX / 2 arbitrarily. */ ``` The intent is clearly to limit write_behind to `COUNTER_MAX / 2`, but the validation check was incorrectly comparing against `COUNTER_MAX`. This creates an inconsistency where: - Values between `COUNTER_MAX / 2` and `COUNTER_MAX` would pass the check - But then get clamped to `COUNTER_MAX / 2` anyway - This means the validation isn't serving its intended purpose ### 3. Impact on Users This bug affects: - **dm-raid users**: When creating new bitmap superblocks for RAID arrays with write-behind configured - **Data consistency**: While not causing data corruption, it creates confusion about the actual limits - **Configuration validation**: Users might set values that appear to be accepted but are silently reduced ### 4. Consistency with Other Code The fix aligns with the pattern used elsewhere: - In `dm-raid.c`: The validation correctly checks `value / 2 > COUNTER_MAX` (equivalent check for sector-based values) - The clamping value of `COUNTER_MAX / 2` is consistently used as the default throughout the codebase ### 5. Backport Criteria This commit meets the stable kernel backport criteria: - **It fixes a bug**: Incorrect validation logic that doesn't match the intended behavior - **Simple and contained**: One-line change with minimal risk - **Clear fix**: The correct value is obvious from the surrounding code and comment - **User-visible impact**: Affects configuration validation for dm-raid users ### 6. Similar Historical Commits Looking at the similar commits provided: - Commit #1 (backported): Added validation to prevent setting max_write_behind without write-mostly devices - Commit #4 (backported): Fixed missing bitmap updates with write-mostly devices Both of these were backported and dealt with correctness issues in the write-behind functionality, establishing a pattern that such fixes are considered stable-worthy. ### 7. Risk Assessment - **Low risk**: Single character change ('/' to '/ 2') - **Well-understood**: The correct limit is documented in the comment - **No ABI changes**: Just tightens an existing validation check - **Fail-safe**: Makes the validation more restrictive, not less ## Conclusion This is a clear bug fix that corrects an incorrect validation check to match the documented and intended behavior. The fix is trivial, safe, and addresses a real issue that affects dm-raid users. It should be backported to ensure consistent behavior across stable kernel versions. drivers/md/md-bitmap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c index 8fc85b6251e48..feff5b29d0985 100644 --- a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c +++ b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c @@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ static int md_bitmap_new_disk_sb(struct bitmap *bitmap) * is a good choice? We choose COUNTER_MAX / 2 arbitrarily. */ write_behind = bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.max_write_behind; - if (write_behind > COUNTER_MAX) + if (write_behind > COUNTER_MAX / 2) write_behind = COUNTER_MAX / 2; sb->write_behind = cpu_to_le32(write_behind); bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.max_write_behind = write_behind; -- 2.39.5

3 weeks, 5 days

1
6
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 1/9] md/md-bitmap: fix dm-raid max_write_behind setting

by Sasha Levin

From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> [ Upstream commit 2afe17794cfed5f80295b1b9facd66e6f65e5002 ] It's supposed to be COUNTER_MAX / 2, not COUNTER_MAX. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/20250524061320.370630-14-yukuai1@huaweic… Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- Now I have a clear understanding. Let me analyze the specific code change in the commit: **YES** This commit should be backported to stable kernel trees. Here's my extensive analysis: ## Analysis of the Bug Fix ### 1. The Bug The code in `md_bitmap_new_disk_sb()` incorrectly validates `write_behind` against `COUNTER_MAX` instead of `COUNTER_MAX / 2`: ```c - if (write_behind > COUNTER_MAX) + if (write_behind > COUNTER_MAX / 2) write_behind = COUNTER_MAX / 2; ``` ### 2. Why This is a Real Bug The comment immediately above this code explicitly states: ```c /* - FIXME: write_behind for RAID1. If not specified, what - is a good choice? We choose COUNTER_MAX / 2 arbitrarily. */ ``` The intent is clearly to limit write_behind to `COUNTER_MAX / 2`, but the validation check was incorrectly comparing against `COUNTER_MAX`. This creates an inconsistency where: - Values between `COUNTER_MAX / 2` and `COUNTER_MAX` would pass the check - But then get clamped to `COUNTER_MAX / 2` anyway - This means the validation isn't serving its intended purpose ### 3. Impact on Users This bug affects: - **dm-raid users**: When creating new bitmap superblocks for RAID arrays with write-behind configured - **Data consistency**: While not causing data corruption, it creates confusion about the actual limits - **Configuration validation**: Users might set values that appear to be accepted but are silently reduced ### 4. Consistency with Other Code The fix aligns with the pattern used elsewhere: - In `dm-raid.c`: The validation correctly checks `value / 2 > COUNTER_MAX` (equivalent check for sector-based values) - The clamping value of `COUNTER_MAX / 2` is consistently used as the default throughout the codebase ### 5. Backport Criteria This commit meets the stable kernel backport criteria: - **It fixes a bug**: Incorrect validation logic that doesn't match the intended behavior - **Simple and contained**: One-line change with minimal risk - **Clear fix**: The correct value is obvious from the surrounding code and comment - **User-visible impact**: Affects configuration validation for dm-raid users ### 6. Similar Historical Commits Looking at the similar commits provided: - Commit #1 (backported): Added validation to prevent setting max_write_behind without write-mostly devices - Commit #4 (backported): Fixed missing bitmap updates with write-mostly devices Both of these were backported and dealt with correctness issues in the write-behind functionality, establishing a pattern that such fixes are considered stable-worthy. ### 7. Risk Assessment - **Low risk**: Single character change ('/' to '/ 2') - **Well-understood**: The correct limit is documented in the comment - **No ABI changes**: Just tightens an existing validation check - **Fail-safe**: Makes the validation more restrictive, not less ## Conclusion This is a clear bug fix that corrects an incorrect validation check to match the documented and intended behavior. The fix is trivial, safe, and addresses a real issue that affects dm-raid users. It should be backported to ensure consistent behavior across stable kernel versions. drivers/md/md-bitmap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c index 91bc764a854c6..f2ba541ed89d4 100644 --- a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c +++ b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c @@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ static int md_bitmap_new_disk_sb(struct bitmap *bitmap) * is a good choice? We choose COUNTER_MAX / 2 arbitrarily. */ write_behind = bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.max_write_behind; - if (write_behind > COUNTER_MAX) + if (write_behind > COUNTER_MAX / 2) write_behind = COUNTER_MAX / 2; sb->write_behind = cpu_to_le32(write_behind); bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.max_write_behind = write_behind; -- 2.39.5

3 weeks, 5 days

1
8
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 01/12] md/md-bitmap: fix dm-raid max_write_behind setting

by Sasha Levin

From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> [ Upstream commit 2afe17794cfed5f80295b1b9facd66e6f65e5002 ] It's supposed to be COUNTER_MAX / 2, not COUNTER_MAX. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/20250524061320.370630-14-yukuai1@huaweic… Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- Now I have a clear understanding. Let me analyze the specific code change in the commit: **YES** This commit should be backported to stable kernel trees. Here's my extensive analysis: ## Analysis of the Bug Fix ### 1. The Bug The code in `md_bitmap_new_disk_sb()` incorrectly validates `write_behind` against `COUNTER_MAX` instead of `COUNTER_MAX / 2`: ```c - if (write_behind > COUNTER_MAX) + if (write_behind > COUNTER_MAX / 2) write_behind = COUNTER_MAX / 2; ``` ### 2. Why This is a Real Bug The comment immediately above this code explicitly states: ```c /* - FIXME: write_behind for RAID1. If not specified, what - is a good choice? We choose COUNTER_MAX / 2 arbitrarily. */ ``` The intent is clearly to limit write_behind to `COUNTER_MAX / 2`, but the validation check was incorrectly comparing against `COUNTER_MAX`. This creates an inconsistency where: - Values between `COUNTER_MAX / 2` and `COUNTER_MAX` would pass the check - But then get clamped to `COUNTER_MAX / 2` anyway - This means the validation isn't serving its intended purpose ### 3. Impact on Users This bug affects: - **dm-raid users**: When creating new bitmap superblocks for RAID arrays with write-behind configured - **Data consistency**: While not causing data corruption, it creates confusion about the actual limits - **Configuration validation**: Users might set values that appear to be accepted but are silently reduced ### 4. Consistency with Other Code The fix aligns with the pattern used elsewhere: - In `dm-raid.c`: The validation correctly checks `value / 2 > COUNTER_MAX` (equivalent check for sector-based values) - The clamping value of `COUNTER_MAX / 2` is consistently used as the default throughout the codebase ### 5. Backport Criteria This commit meets the stable kernel backport criteria: - **It fixes a bug**: Incorrect validation logic that doesn't match the intended behavior - **Simple and contained**: One-line change with minimal risk - **Clear fix**: The correct value is obvious from the surrounding code and comment - **User-visible impact**: Affects configuration validation for dm-raid users ### 6. Similar Historical Commits Looking at the similar commits provided: - Commit #1 (backported): Added validation to prevent setting max_write_behind without write-mostly devices - Commit #4 (backported): Fixed missing bitmap updates with write-mostly devices Both of these were backported and dealt with correctness issues in the write-behind functionality, establishing a pattern that such fixes are considered stable-worthy. ### 7. Risk Assessment - **Low risk**: Single character change ('/' to '/ 2') - **Well-understood**: The correct limit is documented in the comment - **No ABI changes**: Just tightens an existing validation check - **Fail-safe**: Makes the validation more restrictive, not less ## Conclusion This is a clear bug fix that corrects an incorrect validation check to match the documented and intended behavior. The fix is trivial, safe, and addresses a real issue that affects dm-raid users. It should be backported to ensure consistent behavior across stable kernel versions. drivers/md/md-bitmap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c index b26e22dd9ba2e..cb84a4ab8d70f 100644 --- a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c +++ b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c @@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ static int md_bitmap_new_disk_sb(struct bitmap *bitmap) * is a good choice? We choose COUNTER_MAX / 2 arbitrarily. */ write_behind = bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.max_write_behind; - if (write_behind > COUNTER_MAX) + if (write_behind > COUNTER_MAX / 2) write_behind = COUNTER_MAX / 2; sb->write_behind = cpu_to_le32(write_behind); bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.max_write_behind = write_behind; -- 2.39.5

3 weeks, 5 days

1
11
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 01/16] md/md-bitmap: fix dm-raid max_write_behind setting

by Sasha Levin

From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> [ Upstream commit 2afe17794cfed5f80295b1b9facd66e6f65e5002 ] It's supposed to be COUNTER_MAX / 2, not COUNTER_MAX. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/20250524061320.370630-14-yukuai1@huaweic… Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- Now I have a clear understanding. Let me analyze the specific code change in the commit: **YES** This commit should be backported to stable kernel trees. Here's my extensive analysis: ## Analysis of the Bug Fix ### 1. The Bug The code in `md_bitmap_new_disk_sb()` incorrectly validates `write_behind` against `COUNTER_MAX` instead of `COUNTER_MAX / 2`: ```c - if (write_behind > COUNTER_MAX) + if (write_behind > COUNTER_MAX / 2) write_behind = COUNTER_MAX / 2; ``` ### 2. Why This is a Real Bug The comment immediately above this code explicitly states: ```c /* - FIXME: write_behind for RAID1. If not specified, what - is a good choice? We choose COUNTER_MAX / 2 arbitrarily. */ ``` The intent is clearly to limit write_behind to `COUNTER_MAX / 2`, but the validation check was incorrectly comparing against `COUNTER_MAX`. This creates an inconsistency where: - Values between `COUNTER_MAX / 2` and `COUNTER_MAX` would pass the check - But then get clamped to `COUNTER_MAX / 2` anyway - This means the validation isn't serving its intended purpose ### 3. Impact on Users This bug affects: - **dm-raid users**: When creating new bitmap superblocks for RAID arrays with write-behind configured - **Data consistency**: While not causing data corruption, it creates confusion about the actual limits - **Configuration validation**: Users might set values that appear to be accepted but are silently reduced ### 4. Consistency with Other Code The fix aligns with the pattern used elsewhere: - In `dm-raid.c`: The validation correctly checks `value / 2 > COUNTER_MAX` (equivalent check for sector-based values) - The clamping value of `COUNTER_MAX / 2` is consistently used as the default throughout the codebase ### 5. Backport Criteria This commit meets the stable kernel backport criteria: - **It fixes a bug**: Incorrect validation logic that doesn't match the intended behavior - **Simple and contained**: One-line change with minimal risk - **Clear fix**: The correct value is obvious from the surrounding code and comment - **User-visible impact**: Affects configuration validation for dm-raid users ### 6. Similar Historical Commits Looking at the similar commits provided: - Commit #1 (backported): Added validation to prevent setting max_write_behind without write-mostly devices - Commit #4 (backported): Fixed missing bitmap updates with write-mostly devices Both of these were backported and dealt with correctness issues in the write-behind functionality, establishing a pattern that such fixes are considered stable-worthy. ### 7. Risk Assessment - **Low risk**: Single character change ('/' to '/ 2') - **Well-understood**: The correct limit is documented in the comment - **No ABI changes**: Just tightens an existing validation check - **Fail-safe**: Makes the validation more restrictive, not less ## Conclusion This is a clear bug fix that corrects an incorrect validation check to match the documented and intended behavior. The fix is trivial, safe, and addresses a real issue that affects dm-raid users. It should be backported to ensure consistent behavior across stable kernel versions. drivers/md/md-bitmap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c index 02629516748e4..dac27206cd3df 100644 --- a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c +++ b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c @@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ static int md_bitmap_new_disk_sb(struct bitmap *bitmap) * is a good choice? We choose COUNTER_MAX / 2 arbitrarily. */ write_behind = bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.max_write_behind; - if (write_behind > COUNTER_MAX) + if (write_behind > COUNTER_MAX / 2) write_behind = COUNTER_MAX / 2; sb->write_behind = cpu_to_le32(write_behind); bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.max_write_behind = write_behind; -- 2.39.5

3 weeks, 5 days

1
15
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 01/18] md/md-bitmap: fix dm-raid max_write_behind setting

by Sasha Levin

From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> [ Upstream commit 2afe17794cfed5f80295b1b9facd66e6f65e5002 ] It's supposed to be COUNTER_MAX / 2, not COUNTER_MAX. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/20250524061320.370630-14-yukuai1@huaweic… Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- Now I have a clear understanding. Let me analyze the specific code change in the commit: **YES** This commit should be backported to stable kernel trees. Here's my extensive analysis: ## Analysis of the Bug Fix ### 1. The Bug The code in `md_bitmap_new_disk_sb()` incorrectly validates `write_behind` against `COUNTER_MAX` instead of `COUNTER_MAX / 2`: ```c - if (write_behind > COUNTER_MAX) + if (write_behind > COUNTER_MAX / 2) write_behind = COUNTER_MAX / 2; ``` ### 2. Why This is a Real Bug The comment immediately above this code explicitly states: ```c /* - FIXME: write_behind for RAID1. If not specified, what - is a good choice? We choose COUNTER_MAX / 2 arbitrarily. */ ``` The intent is clearly to limit write_behind to `COUNTER_MAX / 2`, but the validation check was incorrectly comparing against `COUNTER_MAX`. This creates an inconsistency where: - Values between `COUNTER_MAX / 2` and `COUNTER_MAX` would pass the check - But then get clamped to `COUNTER_MAX / 2` anyway - This means the validation isn't serving its intended purpose ### 3. Impact on Users This bug affects: - **dm-raid users**: When creating new bitmap superblocks for RAID arrays with write-behind configured - **Data consistency**: While not causing data corruption, it creates confusion about the actual limits - **Configuration validation**: Users might set values that appear to be accepted but are silently reduced ### 4. Consistency with Other Code The fix aligns with the pattern used elsewhere: - In `dm-raid.c`: The validation correctly checks `value / 2 > COUNTER_MAX` (equivalent check for sector-based values) - The clamping value of `COUNTER_MAX / 2` is consistently used as the default throughout the codebase ### 5. Backport Criteria This commit meets the stable kernel backport criteria: - **It fixes a bug**: Incorrect validation logic that doesn't match the intended behavior - **Simple and contained**: One-line change with minimal risk - **Clear fix**: The correct value is obvious from the surrounding code and comment - **User-visible impact**: Affects configuration validation for dm-raid users ### 6. Similar Historical Commits Looking at the similar commits provided: - Commit #1 (backported): Added validation to prevent setting max_write_behind without write-mostly devices - Commit #4 (backported): Fixed missing bitmap updates with write-mostly devices Both of these were backported and dealt with correctness issues in the write-behind functionality, establishing a pattern that such fixes are considered stable-worthy. ### 7. Risk Assessment - **Low risk**: Single character change ('/' to '/ 2') - **Well-understood**: The correct limit is documented in the comment - **No ABI changes**: Just tightens an existing validation check - **Fail-safe**: Makes the validation more restrictive, not less ## Conclusion This is a clear bug fix that corrects an incorrect validation check to match the documented and intended behavior. The fix is trivial, safe, and addresses a real issue that affects dm-raid users. It should be backported to ensure consistent behavior across stable kernel versions. drivers/md/md-bitmap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c index 8317e07b326d0..21decb97bc050 100644 --- a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c +++ b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ static int md_bitmap_new_disk_sb(struct bitmap *bitmap) * is a good choice? We choose COUNTER_MAX / 2 arbitrarily. */ write_behind = bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.max_write_behind; - if (write_behind > COUNTER_MAX) + if (write_behind > COUNTER_MAX / 2) write_behind = COUNTER_MAX / 2; sb->write_behind = cpu_to_le32(write_behind); bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.max_write_behind = write_behind; -- 2.39.5

3 weeks, 5 days

1
17
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 01/23] nvme-tcp: fix I/O stalls on congested sockets

by Sasha Levin

From: Hannes Reinecke <hare(a)kernel.org> [ Upstream commit f42d4796ee100fade86086d1cf98537fb4d326c8 ] When the socket is busy processing nvme_tcp_try_recv() might return -EAGAIN, but this doesn't automatically imply that the sending side is blocked, too. So check if there are pending requests once nvme_tcp_try_recv() returns -EAGAIN and continue with the sending loop to avoid I/O stalls. Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare(a)kernel.org> Acked-by: Chris Leech <cleech(a)redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi(a)grimberg.me> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- Based on my analysis of the commit and comparison with similar commits, here is my determination: **YES** This commit should be backported to stable kernel trees for the following reasons: 1. **Fixes a real user-impacting bug**: The commit addresses I/O stalls on congested sockets, which is a serious issue that can cause system hangs or severe performance degradation. When the socket is congested and `nvme_tcp_try_recv()` returns -EAGAIN, the current code incorrectly assumes that the sending side is also blocked, leading to I/O stalls. 2. **Small and contained fix**: The changes are minimal and localized to the `nvme_tcp_io_work()` function: - Changes `nvme_tcp_try_recv()` to return 0 instead of -EAGAIN to prevent premature exit - Adds a check after receive processing to see if the socket became writable - Only 5 lines of actual code changes 3. **Clear logic fix**: The patch addresses a specific logic error where: - The receive side returns -EAGAIN (socket would block on receive) - But this doesn't mean the send side is also blocked - The fix checks if there are pending requests and if the socket is writable after receive processing 4. **Similar to other backported fixes**: Looking at the historical commits: - Commit #2 (backported): Fixed hangs waiting for icresp response - Commit #3 (backported): Fixed wrong stop condition in io_work - Commit #4 (backported): Fixed UAF when detecting digest errors - Commit #5 (backported): Fixed possible null deref on timed out connections All these commits that were backported involved fixing hangs, stalls, or error conditions in the nvme-tcp driver. 5. **No architectural changes**: The commit doesn't introduce new features or change the architecture. It simply adds a missing check to prevent I/O stalls, which aligns with stable kernel criteria. 6. **Critical subsystem**: NVMe-TCP is used for storage access, and I/O stalls can have severe consequences for system stability and data integrity. The specific code changes show: - `return consumed == -EAGAIN ? 0 : consumed;` - prevents treating EAGAIN as an error - The new check `if (nvme_tcp_queue_has_pending(queue) && sk_stream_is_writeable(queue->sock->sk))` ensures that if there are pending requests and the socket is writable after receive processing, we continue processing instead of stalling. This is exactly the type of bug fix that should be backported to stable kernels to ensure reliable storage operation. drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c index 4cc72be28c731..13ede6e309092 100644 --- a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c @@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ static int nvme_tcp_try_recv(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue) queue->nr_cqe = 0; consumed = sock->ops->read_sock(sk, &rd_desc, nvme_tcp_recv_skb); release_sock(sk); - return consumed; + return consumed == -EAGAIN ? 0 : consumed; } static void nvme_tcp_io_work(struct work_struct *w) @@ -1377,6 +1377,11 @@ static void nvme_tcp_io_work(struct work_struct *w) else if (unlikely(result < 0)) return; + /* did we get some space after spending time in recv? */ + if (nvme_tcp_queue_has_pending(queue) && + sk_stream_is_writeable(queue->sock->sk)) + pending = true; + if (!pending || !queue->rd_enabled) return; -- 2.39.5

3 weeks, 5 days

1
22
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.14 01/29] nvme-tcp: fix I/O stalls on congested sockets

by Sasha Levin

From: Hannes Reinecke <hare(a)kernel.org> [ Upstream commit f42d4796ee100fade86086d1cf98537fb4d326c8 ] When the socket is busy processing nvme_tcp_try_recv() might return -EAGAIN, but this doesn't automatically imply that the sending side is blocked, too. So check if there are pending requests once nvme_tcp_try_recv() returns -EAGAIN and continue with the sending loop to avoid I/O stalls. Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare(a)kernel.org> Acked-by: Chris Leech <cleech(a)redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi(a)grimberg.me> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- Based on my analysis of the commit and comparison with similar commits, here is my determination: **YES** This commit should be backported to stable kernel trees for the following reasons: 1. **Fixes a real user-impacting bug**: The commit addresses I/O stalls on congested sockets, which is a serious issue that can cause system hangs or severe performance degradation. When the socket is congested and `nvme_tcp_try_recv()` returns -EAGAIN, the current code incorrectly assumes that the sending side is also blocked, leading to I/O stalls. 2. **Small and contained fix**: The changes are minimal and localized to the `nvme_tcp_io_work()` function: - Changes `nvme_tcp_try_recv()` to return 0 instead of -EAGAIN to prevent premature exit - Adds a check after receive processing to see if the socket became writable - Only 5 lines of actual code changes 3. **Clear logic fix**: The patch addresses a specific logic error where: - The receive side returns -EAGAIN (socket would block on receive) - But this doesn't mean the send side is also blocked - The fix checks if there are pending requests and if the socket is writable after receive processing 4. **Similar to other backported fixes**: Looking at the historical commits: - Commit #2 (backported): Fixed hangs waiting for icresp response - Commit #3 (backported): Fixed wrong stop condition in io_work - Commit #4 (backported): Fixed UAF when detecting digest errors - Commit #5 (backported): Fixed possible null deref on timed out connections All these commits that were backported involved fixing hangs, stalls, or error conditions in the nvme-tcp driver. 5. **No architectural changes**: The commit doesn't introduce new features or change the architecture. It simply adds a missing check to prevent I/O stalls, which aligns with stable kernel criteria. 6. **Critical subsystem**: NVMe-TCP is used for storage access, and I/O stalls can have severe consequences for system stability and data integrity. The specific code changes show: - `return consumed == -EAGAIN ? 0 : consumed;` - prevents treating EAGAIN as an error - The new check `if (nvme_tcp_queue_has_pending(queue) && sk_stream_is_writeable(queue->sock->sk))` ensures that if there are pending requests and the socket is writable after receive processing, we continue processing instead of stalling. This is exactly the type of bug fix that should be backported to stable kernels to ensure reliable storage operation. drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c index d991baa82a1c2..a2e825e37b38b 100644 --- a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c @@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ static int nvme_tcp_try_recv(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue) queue->nr_cqe = 0; consumed = sock->ops->read_sock(sk, &rd_desc, nvme_tcp_recv_skb); release_sock(sk); - return consumed; + return consumed == -EAGAIN ? 0 : consumed; } static void nvme_tcp_io_work(struct work_struct *w) @@ -1377,6 +1377,11 @@ static void nvme_tcp_io_work(struct work_struct *w) else if (unlikely(result < 0)) return; + /* did we get some space after spending time in recv? */ + if (nvme_tcp_queue_has_pending(queue) && + sk_stream_is_writeable(queue->sock->sk)) + pending = true; + if (!pending || !queue->rd_enabled) return; -- 2.39.5

3 weeks, 5 days

1
28
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.15 01/35] wifi: iwlwifi: mld: Move regulatory domain initialization

by Sasha Levin

From: Ilan Peer <ilan.peer(a)intel.com> [ Upstream commit f81aa834bfa91c827f290b62a245e23c5ad2813c ] The regulatory domain information was initialized every time the FW was loaded and the device was restarted. This was unnecessary and useless as at this stage the wiphy channels information was not setup yet so while the regulatory domain was set to the wiphy, the channel information was not updated. In case that a specific MCC was configured during FW initialization then following updates with this MCC are ignored, and thus the wiphy channels information is left with information not matching the regulatory domain. This commit moves the regulatory domain initialization to after the operational firmware is started, i.e., after the wiphy channels were configured and the regulatory information is needed. Signed-off-by: Ilan Peer <ilan.peer(a)intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit(a)intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250604061200.f138a7382093.I2fd8b3e99be13c2687da4… Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- **YES** This commit should be backported to stable kernel trees. Here's my extensive analysis: ## Bug Fix Nature The commit fixes a real bug where regulatory domain information and wiphy channel configurations become mismatched. Specifically, from the commit message: 1. **Timing Issue**: The regulatory domain was being initialized in `iwl_mld_load_fw()` before wiphy channels were properly configured 2. **Update Failures**: When a specific MCC (Mobile Country Code) was configured during FW initialization, subsequent updates with the same MCC would be ignored, leaving channel information inconsistent with the regulatory domain ## Code Analysis The changes are minimal and low-risk: - **Removed from `iwl_mld_load_fw()`**: Lines removing the `iwl_mld_init_mcc()` call and its error handling - **Added to `iwl_mld_start_fw()`**: The same call is added after `iwl_mld_config_fw()`, ensuring proper initialization order ## Comparison with Similar Commits Most relevant is Similar Commit #4 (marked YES for backporting), which addressed regulatory domain update issues when firmware starts. That commit fixed the handling of `MCC_RESP_ILLEGAL` responses to ensure channel lists were properly updated - a closely related regulatory compliance issue. ## Stable Kernel Criteria This commit meets the stable kernel requirements: 1. **Fixes a real bug**: Regulatory domain/channel mismatch is a serious issue affecting wireless compliance 2. **Small and contained**: Only moves a function call to the correct initialization sequence 3. **Low regression risk**: No new logic introduced, just reordering existing initialization 4. **Important functionality**: Regulatory compliance is critical for legal wireless operation 5. **Clear root cause**: The issue and fix are well-understood and documented ## Repository Context From examining the kernel repository, I found that regulatory domain initialization has been an ongoing concern in iwlwifi, with multiple fixes addressing timing and synchronization issues. The `lar_regdom_set` flag is critical for preventing operations (like scans) before regulatory setup is complete. The fix ensures that `iwl_mld_init_mcc()` is called after the firmware is fully configured (`iwl_mld_config_fw()`), which is the proper time when wiphy channels are set up and ready to receive regulatory updates. This is precisely the type of bug fix that stable kernels should receive - it corrects a specific functional issue without introducing architectural changes or new features. drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mld/fw.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mld/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mld/fw.c index 4b083d447ee2f..6be9366bd4b14 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mld/fw.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mld/fw.c @@ -339,10 +339,6 @@ int iwl_mld_load_fw(struct iwl_mld *mld) if (ret) goto err; - ret = iwl_mld_init_mcc(mld); - if (ret) - goto err; - mld->fw_status.running = true; return 0; @@ -535,6 +531,10 @@ int iwl_mld_start_fw(struct iwl_mld *mld) if (ret) goto error; + ret = iwl_mld_init_mcc(mld); + if (ret) + goto error; + return 0; error: -- 2.39.5

3 weeks, 5 days

1
34
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror