March 2025 - Linux-stable-mirror

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net: enetc: VFs do not support HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x a562d0c4a893eae3ea51d512c4d90ab858a6b7ec # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030436-plural-dislodge-e1b9@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From a562d0c4a893eae3ea51d512c4d90ab858a6b7ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wei Fang <wei.fang(a)nxp.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 19:12:47 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] net: enetc: VFs do not support HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC Actually ENETC VFs do not support HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC because only ENETC PF can access PMa_SINGLE_STEP registers. And there will be a crash if VFs are used to test one-step timestamp, the crash log as follows. [ 129.110909] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00000000000080c0 [ 129.287769] Call trace: [ 129.290219] enetc_port_mac_wr+0x30/0xec (P) [ 129.294504] enetc_start_xmit+0xda4/0xe74 [ 129.298525] enetc_xmit+0x70/0xec [ 129.301848] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x98/0x118 Fixes: 41514737ecaa ("enetc: add get_ts_info interface for ethtool") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang(a)nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean(a)nxp.com> Tested-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean(a)nxp.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250224111251.1061098-5-wei.fang@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c index 3cb9ebb13b19..e946d8652790 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c @@ -3244,6 +3244,9 @@ static int enetc_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *ndev, struct ifreq *ifr) new_offloads |= ENETC_F_TX_TSTAMP; break; case HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC: + if (!enetc_si_is_pf(priv->si)) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + new_offloads &= ~ENETC_F_TX_TSTAMP_MASK; new_offloads |= ENETC_F_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC_TSTAMP; break; diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c index bf34b5bb1e35..ece3ae28ba82 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c @@ -832,6 +832,7 @@ static int enetc_set_coalesce(struct net_device *ndev, static int enetc_get_ts_info(struct net_device *ndev, struct kernel_ethtool_ts_info *info) { + struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); int *phc_idx; phc_idx = symbol_get(enetc_phc_index); @@ -852,8 +853,10 @@ static int enetc_get_ts_info(struct net_device *ndev, SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE; info->tx_types = (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_OFF) | - (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_ON) | - (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC); + (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_ON); + + if (enetc_si_is_pf(priv->si)) + info->tx_types |= (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC); info->rx_filters = (1 << HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE) | (1 << HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL);

6 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net: enetc: fix the off-by-one issue in enetc_map_tx_buffs()" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 39ab773e4c120f7f98d759415ccc2aca706bbc10 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030409-primp-ripcord-cc40@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 39ab773e4c120f7f98d759415ccc2aca706bbc10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wei Fang <wei.fang(a)nxp.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 19:12:44 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] net: enetc: fix the off-by-one issue in enetc_map_tx_buffs() When a DMA mapping error occurs while processing skb frags, it will free one more tx_swbd than expected, so fix this off-by-one issue. Fixes: d4fd0404c1c9 ("enetc: Introduce basic PF and VF ENETC ethernet drivers") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Suggested-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean(a)nxp.com> Suggested-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski(a)linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang(a)nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean(a)nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil(a)nxp.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250224111251.1061098-2-wei.fang@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c index 6a6fc819dfde..55ad31a5073e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c @@ -167,6 +167,24 @@ static bool enetc_skb_is_tcp(struct sk_buff *skb) return skb->csum_offset == offsetof(struct tcphdr, check); } +/** + * enetc_unwind_tx_frame() - Unwind the DMA mappings of a multi-buffer Tx frame + * @tx_ring: Pointer to the Tx ring on which the buffer descriptors are located + * @count: Number of Tx buffer descriptors which need to be unmapped + * @i: Index of the last successfully mapped Tx buffer descriptor + */ +static void enetc_unwind_tx_frame(struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring, int count, int i) +{ + while (count--) { + struct enetc_tx_swbd *tx_swbd = &tx_ring->tx_swbd[i]; + + enetc_free_tx_frame(tx_ring, tx_swbd); + if (i == 0) + i = tx_ring->bd_count; + i--; + } +} + static int enetc_map_tx_buffs(struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring, struct sk_buff *skb) { bool do_vlan, do_onestep_tstamp = false, do_twostep_tstamp = false; @@ -372,13 +390,7 @@ static int enetc_map_tx_buffs(struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring, struct sk_buff *skb) dma_err: dev_err(tx_ring->dev, "DMA map error"); - do { - tx_swbd = &tx_ring->tx_swbd[i]; - enetc_free_tx_frame(tx_ring, tx_swbd); - if (i == 0) - i = tx_ring->bd_count; - i--; - } while (count--); + enetc_unwind_tx_frame(tx_ring, count, i); return 0; }

6 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net: enetc: fix the off-by-one issue in enetc_map_tx_buffs()" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 39ab773e4c120f7f98d759415ccc2aca706bbc10 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030409-kiln-astound-cb63@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 39ab773e4c120f7f98d759415ccc2aca706bbc10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wei Fang <wei.fang(a)nxp.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 19:12:44 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] net: enetc: fix the off-by-one issue in enetc_map_tx_buffs() When a DMA mapping error occurs while processing skb frags, it will free one more tx_swbd than expected, so fix this off-by-one issue. Fixes: d4fd0404c1c9 ("enetc: Introduce basic PF and VF ENETC ethernet drivers") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Suggested-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean(a)nxp.com> Suggested-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski(a)linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang(a)nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean(a)nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil(a)nxp.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250224111251.1061098-2-wei.fang@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c index 6a6fc819dfde..55ad31a5073e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c @@ -167,6 +167,24 @@ static bool enetc_skb_is_tcp(struct sk_buff *skb) return skb->csum_offset == offsetof(struct tcphdr, check); } +/** + * enetc_unwind_tx_frame() - Unwind the DMA mappings of a multi-buffer Tx frame + * @tx_ring: Pointer to the Tx ring on which the buffer descriptors are located + * @count: Number of Tx buffer descriptors which need to be unmapped + * @i: Index of the last successfully mapped Tx buffer descriptor + */ +static void enetc_unwind_tx_frame(struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring, int count, int i) +{ + while (count--) { + struct enetc_tx_swbd *tx_swbd = &tx_ring->tx_swbd[i]; + + enetc_free_tx_frame(tx_ring, tx_swbd); + if (i == 0) + i = tx_ring->bd_count; + i--; + } +} + static int enetc_map_tx_buffs(struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring, struct sk_buff *skb) { bool do_vlan, do_onestep_tstamp = false, do_twostep_tstamp = false; @@ -372,13 +390,7 @@ static int enetc_map_tx_buffs(struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring, struct sk_buff *skb) dma_err: dev_err(tx_ring->dev, "DMA map error"); - do { - tx_swbd = &tx_ring->tx_swbd[i]; - enetc_free_tx_frame(tx_ring, tx_swbd); - if (i == 0) - i = tx_ring->bd_count; - i--; - } while (count--); + enetc_unwind_tx_frame(tx_ring, count, i); return 0; }

6 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix data overwriting bug during buffered write when" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x efa11fd269c139e29b71ec21bc9c9c0063fde40d # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030420-underfeed-siren-2384@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From efa11fd269c139e29b71ec21bc9c9c0063fde40d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 09:06:33 +1030 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix data overwriting bug during buffered write when block size < page size [BUG] When running generic/418 with a btrfs whose block size < page size (subpage cases), it always fails. And the following minimal reproducer is more than enough to trigger it reliably: workload() { mkfs.btrfs -s 4k -f $dev > /dev/null dmesg -C mount $dev $mnt $fsstree_dir/src/dio-invalidate-cache -r -b 4096 -n 3 -i 1 -f $mnt/diotest ret=$? umount $mnt stop_trace if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then fail fi } for (( i = 0; i < 1024; i++)); do echo "=== $i/$runtime ===" workload done [CAUSE] With extra trace printk added to the following functions: - btrfs_buffered_write() * Which folio is touched * The file offset (start) where the buffered write is at * How many bytes are copied * The content of the write (the first 2 bytes) - submit_one_sector() * Which folio is touched * The position inside the folio * The content of the page cache (the first 2 bytes) - pagecache_isize_extended() * The parameters of the function itself * The parameters of the folio_zero_range() Which are enough to show the problem: 22.158114: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=0 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158161: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=0 content=0x0101 22.158609: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=4096 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158634: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=8192 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158650: pagecache_isize_extended: folio=0 from=4096 to=8192 bsize=4096 zero off=4096 len=8192 22.158682: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=4096 content=0x0000 22.158686: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=8192 content=0x0101 The tool dio-invalidate-cache will start 3 threads, each doing a buffered write with 0x01 at offset 0, 4096 and 8192, do a fsync, then do a direct read, and compare the read buffer with the write buffer. Note that all 3 btrfs_buffered_write() are writing the correct 0x01 into the page cache. But at submit_one_sector(), at file offset 4096, the content is zeroed out, by pagecache_isize_extended(). The race happens like this: Thread A is writing into range [4K, 8K). Thread B is writing into range [8K, 12k). Thread A | Thread B -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ btrfs_buffered_write() | btrfs_buffered_write() |- old_isize = 4K; | |- old_isize = 4096; |- btrfs_inode_lock() | | |- write into folio range [4K, 8K) | | |- pagecache_isize_extended() | | | extend isize from 4096 to 8192 | | | no folio_zero_range() called | | |- btrfs_inode_lock() | | | |- btrfs_inode_lock() | |- write into folio range [8K, 12K) | |- pagecache_isize_extended() | | calling folio_zero_range(4K, 8K) | | This is caused by the old_isize is | | grabbed too early, without any | | inode lock. | |- btrfs_inode_unlock() The @old_isize is grabbed without inode lock, causing race between two buffered write threads and making pagecache_isize_extended() to zero range which is still containing cached data. And this is only affecting subpage btrfs, because for regular blocksize == page size case, the function pagecache_isize_extended() will do nothing if the block size >= page size. [FIX] Grab the old i_size while holding the inode lock. This means each buffered write thread will have a stable view of the old inode size, thus avoid the above race. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Fixes: 5e8b9ef30392 ("btrfs: move pos increment and pagecache extension to btrfs_buffered_write") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c index ed3c0d6546c5..0b568c8d24cb 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c @@ -1090,7 +1090,7 @@ ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *i) u64 lockend; size_t num_written = 0; ssize_t ret; - loff_t old_isize = i_size_read(inode); + loff_t old_isize; unsigned int ilock_flags = 0; const bool nowait = (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT); unsigned int bdp_flags = (nowait ? BDP_ASYNC : 0); @@ -1103,6 +1103,13 @@ ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *i) if (ret < 0) return ret; + /* + * We can only trust the isize with inode lock held, or it can race with + * other buffered writes and cause incorrect call of + * pagecache_isize_extended() to overwrite existing data. + */ + old_isize = i_size_read(inode); + ret = generic_write_checks(iocb, i); if (ret <= 0) goto out;

6 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix data overwriting bug during buffered write when" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x efa11fd269c139e29b71ec21bc9c9c0063fde40d # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030418-sharpness-steadier-31ea@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From efa11fd269c139e29b71ec21bc9c9c0063fde40d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 09:06:33 +1030 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix data overwriting bug during buffered write when block size < page size [BUG] When running generic/418 with a btrfs whose block size < page size (subpage cases), it always fails. And the following minimal reproducer is more than enough to trigger it reliably: workload() { mkfs.btrfs -s 4k -f $dev > /dev/null dmesg -C mount $dev $mnt $fsstree_dir/src/dio-invalidate-cache -r -b 4096 -n 3 -i 1 -f $mnt/diotest ret=$? umount $mnt stop_trace if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then fail fi } for (( i = 0; i < 1024; i++)); do echo "=== $i/$runtime ===" workload done [CAUSE] With extra trace printk added to the following functions: - btrfs_buffered_write() * Which folio is touched * The file offset (start) where the buffered write is at * How many bytes are copied * The content of the write (the first 2 bytes) - submit_one_sector() * Which folio is touched * The position inside the folio * The content of the page cache (the first 2 bytes) - pagecache_isize_extended() * The parameters of the function itself * The parameters of the folio_zero_range() Which are enough to show the problem: 22.158114: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=0 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158161: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=0 content=0x0101 22.158609: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=4096 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158634: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=8192 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158650: pagecache_isize_extended: folio=0 from=4096 to=8192 bsize=4096 zero off=4096 len=8192 22.158682: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=4096 content=0x0000 22.158686: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=8192 content=0x0101 The tool dio-invalidate-cache will start 3 threads, each doing a buffered write with 0x01 at offset 0, 4096 and 8192, do a fsync, then do a direct read, and compare the read buffer with the write buffer. Note that all 3 btrfs_buffered_write() are writing the correct 0x01 into the page cache. But at submit_one_sector(), at file offset 4096, the content is zeroed out, by pagecache_isize_extended(). The race happens like this: Thread A is writing into range [4K, 8K). Thread B is writing into range [8K, 12k). Thread A | Thread B -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ btrfs_buffered_write() | btrfs_buffered_write() |- old_isize = 4K; | |- old_isize = 4096; |- btrfs_inode_lock() | | |- write into folio range [4K, 8K) | | |- pagecache_isize_extended() | | | extend isize from 4096 to 8192 | | | no folio_zero_range() called | | |- btrfs_inode_lock() | | | |- btrfs_inode_lock() | |- write into folio range [8K, 12K) | |- pagecache_isize_extended() | | calling folio_zero_range(4K, 8K) | | This is caused by the old_isize is | | grabbed too early, without any | | inode lock. | |- btrfs_inode_unlock() The @old_isize is grabbed without inode lock, causing race between two buffered write threads and making pagecache_isize_extended() to zero range which is still containing cached data. And this is only affecting subpage btrfs, because for regular blocksize == page size case, the function pagecache_isize_extended() will do nothing if the block size >= page size. [FIX] Grab the old i_size while holding the inode lock. This means each buffered write thread will have a stable view of the old inode size, thus avoid the above race. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Fixes: 5e8b9ef30392 ("btrfs: move pos increment and pagecache extension to btrfs_buffered_write") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c index ed3c0d6546c5..0b568c8d24cb 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c @@ -1090,7 +1090,7 @@ ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *i) u64 lockend; size_t num_written = 0; ssize_t ret; - loff_t old_isize = i_size_read(inode); + loff_t old_isize; unsigned int ilock_flags = 0; const bool nowait = (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT); unsigned int bdp_flags = (nowait ? BDP_ASYNC : 0); @@ -1103,6 +1103,13 @@ ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *i) if (ret < 0) return ret; + /* + * We can only trust the isize with inode lock held, or it can race with + * other buffered writes and cause incorrect call of + * pagecache_isize_extended() to overwrite existing data. + */ + old_isize = i_size_read(inode); + ret = generic_write_checks(iocb, i); if (ret <= 0) goto out;

6 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix data overwriting bug during buffered write when" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x efa11fd269c139e29b71ec21bc9c9c0063fde40d # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030416-prong-outdated-7f45@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From efa11fd269c139e29b71ec21bc9c9c0063fde40d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 09:06:33 +1030 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix data overwriting bug during buffered write when block size < page size [BUG] When running generic/418 with a btrfs whose block size < page size (subpage cases), it always fails. And the following minimal reproducer is more than enough to trigger it reliably: workload() { mkfs.btrfs -s 4k -f $dev > /dev/null dmesg -C mount $dev $mnt $fsstree_dir/src/dio-invalidate-cache -r -b 4096 -n 3 -i 1 -f $mnt/diotest ret=$? umount $mnt stop_trace if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then fail fi } for (( i = 0; i < 1024; i++)); do echo "=== $i/$runtime ===" workload done [CAUSE] With extra trace printk added to the following functions: - btrfs_buffered_write() * Which folio is touched * The file offset (start) where the buffered write is at * How many bytes are copied * The content of the write (the first 2 bytes) - submit_one_sector() * Which folio is touched * The position inside the folio * The content of the page cache (the first 2 bytes) - pagecache_isize_extended() * The parameters of the function itself * The parameters of the folio_zero_range() Which are enough to show the problem: 22.158114: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=0 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158161: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=0 content=0x0101 22.158609: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=4096 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158634: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=8192 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158650: pagecache_isize_extended: folio=0 from=4096 to=8192 bsize=4096 zero off=4096 len=8192 22.158682: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=4096 content=0x0000 22.158686: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=8192 content=0x0101 The tool dio-invalidate-cache will start 3 threads, each doing a buffered write with 0x01 at offset 0, 4096 and 8192, do a fsync, then do a direct read, and compare the read buffer with the write buffer. Note that all 3 btrfs_buffered_write() are writing the correct 0x01 into the page cache. But at submit_one_sector(), at file offset 4096, the content is zeroed out, by pagecache_isize_extended(). The race happens like this: Thread A is writing into range [4K, 8K). Thread B is writing into range [8K, 12k). Thread A | Thread B -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ btrfs_buffered_write() | btrfs_buffered_write() |- old_isize = 4K; | |- old_isize = 4096; |- btrfs_inode_lock() | | |- write into folio range [4K, 8K) | | |- pagecache_isize_extended() | | | extend isize from 4096 to 8192 | | | no folio_zero_range() called | | |- btrfs_inode_lock() | | | |- btrfs_inode_lock() | |- write into folio range [8K, 12K) | |- pagecache_isize_extended() | | calling folio_zero_range(4K, 8K) | | This is caused by the old_isize is | | grabbed too early, without any | | inode lock. | |- btrfs_inode_unlock() The @old_isize is grabbed without inode lock, causing race between two buffered write threads and making pagecache_isize_extended() to zero range which is still containing cached data. And this is only affecting subpage btrfs, because for regular blocksize == page size case, the function pagecache_isize_extended() will do nothing if the block size >= page size. [FIX] Grab the old i_size while holding the inode lock. This means each buffered write thread will have a stable view of the old inode size, thus avoid the above race. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Fixes: 5e8b9ef30392 ("btrfs: move pos increment and pagecache extension to btrfs_buffered_write") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c index ed3c0d6546c5..0b568c8d24cb 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c @@ -1090,7 +1090,7 @@ ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *i) u64 lockend; size_t num_written = 0; ssize_t ret; - loff_t old_isize = i_size_read(inode); + loff_t old_isize; unsigned int ilock_flags = 0; const bool nowait = (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT); unsigned int bdp_flags = (nowait ? BDP_ASYNC : 0); @@ -1103,6 +1103,13 @@ ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *i) if (ret < 0) return ret; + /* + * We can only trust the isize with inode lock held, or it can race with + * other buffered writes and cause incorrect call of + * pagecache_isize_extended() to overwrite existing data. + */ + old_isize = i_size_read(inode); + ret = generic_write_checks(iocb, i); if (ret <= 0) goto out;

6 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix data overwriting bug during buffered write when" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x efa11fd269c139e29b71ec21bc9c9c0063fde40d # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030414-enroll-suitor-daa4@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From efa11fd269c139e29b71ec21bc9c9c0063fde40d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 09:06:33 +1030 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix data overwriting bug during buffered write when block size < page size [BUG] When running generic/418 with a btrfs whose block size < page size (subpage cases), it always fails. And the following minimal reproducer is more than enough to trigger it reliably: workload() { mkfs.btrfs -s 4k -f $dev > /dev/null dmesg -C mount $dev $mnt $fsstree_dir/src/dio-invalidate-cache -r -b 4096 -n 3 -i 1 -f $mnt/diotest ret=$? umount $mnt stop_trace if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then fail fi } for (( i = 0; i < 1024; i++)); do echo "=== $i/$runtime ===" workload done [CAUSE] With extra trace printk added to the following functions: - btrfs_buffered_write() * Which folio is touched * The file offset (start) where the buffered write is at * How many bytes are copied * The content of the write (the first 2 bytes) - submit_one_sector() * Which folio is touched * The position inside the folio * The content of the page cache (the first 2 bytes) - pagecache_isize_extended() * The parameters of the function itself * The parameters of the folio_zero_range() Which are enough to show the problem: 22.158114: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=0 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158161: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=0 content=0x0101 22.158609: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=4096 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158634: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=8192 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158650: pagecache_isize_extended: folio=0 from=4096 to=8192 bsize=4096 zero off=4096 len=8192 22.158682: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=4096 content=0x0000 22.158686: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=8192 content=0x0101 The tool dio-invalidate-cache will start 3 threads, each doing a buffered write with 0x01 at offset 0, 4096 and 8192, do a fsync, then do a direct read, and compare the read buffer with the write buffer. Note that all 3 btrfs_buffered_write() are writing the correct 0x01 into the page cache. But at submit_one_sector(), at file offset 4096, the content is zeroed out, by pagecache_isize_extended(). The race happens like this: Thread A is writing into range [4K, 8K). Thread B is writing into range [8K, 12k). Thread A | Thread B -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ btrfs_buffered_write() | btrfs_buffered_write() |- old_isize = 4K; | |- old_isize = 4096; |- btrfs_inode_lock() | | |- write into folio range [4K, 8K) | | |- pagecache_isize_extended() | | | extend isize from 4096 to 8192 | | | no folio_zero_range() called | | |- btrfs_inode_lock() | | | |- btrfs_inode_lock() | |- write into folio range [8K, 12K) | |- pagecache_isize_extended() | | calling folio_zero_range(4K, 8K) | | This is caused by the old_isize is | | grabbed too early, without any | | inode lock. | |- btrfs_inode_unlock() The @old_isize is grabbed without inode lock, causing race between two buffered write threads and making pagecache_isize_extended() to zero range which is still containing cached data. And this is only affecting subpage btrfs, because for regular blocksize == page size case, the function pagecache_isize_extended() will do nothing if the block size >= page size. [FIX] Grab the old i_size while holding the inode lock. This means each buffered write thread will have a stable view of the old inode size, thus avoid the above race. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Fixes: 5e8b9ef30392 ("btrfs: move pos increment and pagecache extension to btrfs_buffered_write") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c index ed3c0d6546c5..0b568c8d24cb 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c @@ -1090,7 +1090,7 @@ ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *i) u64 lockend; size_t num_written = 0; ssize_t ret; - loff_t old_isize = i_size_read(inode); + loff_t old_isize; unsigned int ilock_flags = 0; const bool nowait = (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT); unsigned int bdp_flags = (nowait ? BDP_ASYNC : 0); @@ -1103,6 +1103,13 @@ ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *i) if (ret < 0) return ret; + /* + * We can only trust the isize with inode lock held, or it can race with + * other buffered writes and cause incorrect call of + * pagecache_isize_extended() to overwrite existing data. + */ + old_isize = i_size_read(inode); + ret = generic_write_checks(iocb, i); if (ret <= 0) goto out;

6 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix data overwriting bug during buffered write when" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x efa11fd269c139e29b71ec21bc9c9c0063fde40d # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030412-gliding-oncoming-9727@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From efa11fd269c139e29b71ec21bc9c9c0063fde40d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 09:06:33 +1030 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix data overwriting bug during buffered write when block size < page size [BUG] When running generic/418 with a btrfs whose block size < page size (subpage cases), it always fails. And the following minimal reproducer is more than enough to trigger it reliably: workload() { mkfs.btrfs -s 4k -f $dev > /dev/null dmesg -C mount $dev $mnt $fsstree_dir/src/dio-invalidate-cache -r -b 4096 -n 3 -i 1 -f $mnt/diotest ret=$? umount $mnt stop_trace if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then fail fi } for (( i = 0; i < 1024; i++)); do echo "=== $i/$runtime ===" workload done [CAUSE] With extra trace printk added to the following functions: - btrfs_buffered_write() * Which folio is touched * The file offset (start) where the buffered write is at * How many bytes are copied * The content of the write (the first 2 bytes) - submit_one_sector() * Which folio is touched * The position inside the folio * The content of the page cache (the first 2 bytes) - pagecache_isize_extended() * The parameters of the function itself * The parameters of the folio_zero_range() Which are enough to show the problem: 22.158114: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=0 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158161: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=0 content=0x0101 22.158609: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=4096 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158634: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=8192 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158650: pagecache_isize_extended: folio=0 from=4096 to=8192 bsize=4096 zero off=4096 len=8192 22.158682: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=4096 content=0x0000 22.158686: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=8192 content=0x0101 The tool dio-invalidate-cache will start 3 threads, each doing a buffered write with 0x01 at offset 0, 4096 and 8192, do a fsync, then do a direct read, and compare the read buffer with the write buffer. Note that all 3 btrfs_buffered_write() are writing the correct 0x01 into the page cache. But at submit_one_sector(), at file offset 4096, the content is zeroed out, by pagecache_isize_extended(). The race happens like this: Thread A is writing into range [4K, 8K). Thread B is writing into range [8K, 12k). Thread A | Thread B -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ btrfs_buffered_write() | btrfs_buffered_write() |- old_isize = 4K; | |- old_isize = 4096; |- btrfs_inode_lock() | | |- write into folio range [4K, 8K) | | |- pagecache_isize_extended() | | | extend isize from 4096 to 8192 | | | no folio_zero_range() called | | |- btrfs_inode_lock() | | | |- btrfs_inode_lock() | |- write into folio range [8K, 12K) | |- pagecache_isize_extended() | | calling folio_zero_range(4K, 8K) | | This is caused by the old_isize is | | grabbed too early, without any | | inode lock. | |- btrfs_inode_unlock() The @old_isize is grabbed without inode lock, causing race between two buffered write threads and making pagecache_isize_extended() to zero range which is still containing cached data. And this is only affecting subpage btrfs, because for regular blocksize == page size case, the function pagecache_isize_extended() will do nothing if the block size >= page size. [FIX] Grab the old i_size while holding the inode lock. This means each buffered write thread will have a stable view of the old inode size, thus avoid the above race. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Fixes: 5e8b9ef30392 ("btrfs: move pos increment and pagecache extension to btrfs_buffered_write") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c index ed3c0d6546c5..0b568c8d24cb 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c @@ -1090,7 +1090,7 @@ ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *i) u64 lockend; size_t num_written = 0; ssize_t ret; - loff_t old_isize = i_size_read(inode); + loff_t old_isize; unsigned int ilock_flags = 0; const bool nowait = (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT); unsigned int bdp_flags = (nowait ? BDP_ASYNC : 0); @@ -1103,6 +1103,13 @@ ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *i) if (ret < 0) return ret; + /* + * We can only trust the isize with inode lock held, or it can race with + * other buffered writes and cause incorrect call of + * pagecache_isize_extended() to overwrite existing data. + */ + old_isize = i_size_read(inode); + ret = generic_write_checks(iocb, i); if (ret <= 0) goto out;

6 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix data overwriting bug during buffered write when" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.12.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x efa11fd269c139e29b71ec21bc9c9c0063fde40d # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030406-snowcap-stagnate-0d6c@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.12.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From efa11fd269c139e29b71ec21bc9c9c0063fde40d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 09:06:33 +1030 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix data overwriting bug during buffered write when block size < page size [BUG] When running generic/418 with a btrfs whose block size < page size (subpage cases), it always fails. And the following minimal reproducer is more than enough to trigger it reliably: workload() { mkfs.btrfs -s 4k -f $dev > /dev/null dmesg -C mount $dev $mnt $fsstree_dir/src/dio-invalidate-cache -r -b 4096 -n 3 -i 1 -f $mnt/diotest ret=$? umount $mnt stop_trace if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then fail fi } for (( i = 0; i < 1024; i++)); do echo "=== $i/$runtime ===" workload done [CAUSE] With extra trace printk added to the following functions: - btrfs_buffered_write() * Which folio is touched * The file offset (start) where the buffered write is at * How many bytes are copied * The content of the write (the first 2 bytes) - submit_one_sector() * Which folio is touched * The position inside the folio * The content of the page cache (the first 2 bytes) - pagecache_isize_extended() * The parameters of the function itself * The parameters of the folio_zero_range() Which are enough to show the problem: 22.158114: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=0 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158161: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=0 content=0x0101 22.158609: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=4096 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158634: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=8192 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158650: pagecache_isize_extended: folio=0 from=4096 to=8192 bsize=4096 zero off=4096 len=8192 22.158682: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=4096 content=0x0000 22.158686: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=8192 content=0x0101 The tool dio-invalidate-cache will start 3 threads, each doing a buffered write with 0x01 at offset 0, 4096 and 8192, do a fsync, then do a direct read, and compare the read buffer with the write buffer. Note that all 3 btrfs_buffered_write() are writing the correct 0x01 into the page cache. But at submit_one_sector(), at file offset 4096, the content is zeroed out, by pagecache_isize_extended(). The race happens like this: Thread A is writing into range [4K, 8K). Thread B is writing into range [8K, 12k). Thread A | Thread B -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ btrfs_buffered_write() | btrfs_buffered_write() |- old_isize = 4K; | |- old_isize = 4096; |- btrfs_inode_lock() | | |- write into folio range [4K, 8K) | | |- pagecache_isize_extended() | | | extend isize from 4096 to 8192 | | | no folio_zero_range() called | | |- btrfs_inode_lock() | | | |- btrfs_inode_lock() | |- write into folio range [8K, 12K) | |- pagecache_isize_extended() | | calling folio_zero_range(4K, 8K) | | This is caused by the old_isize is | | grabbed too early, without any | | inode lock. | |- btrfs_inode_unlock() The @old_isize is grabbed without inode lock, causing race between two buffered write threads and making pagecache_isize_extended() to zero range which is still containing cached data. And this is only affecting subpage btrfs, because for regular blocksize == page size case, the function pagecache_isize_extended() will do nothing if the block size >= page size. [FIX] Grab the old i_size while holding the inode lock. This means each buffered write thread will have a stable view of the old inode size, thus avoid the above race. CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Fixes: 5e8b9ef30392 ("btrfs: move pos increment and pagecache extension to btrfs_buffered_write") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c index ed3c0d6546c5..0b568c8d24cb 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c @@ -1090,7 +1090,7 @@ ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *i) u64 lockend; size_t num_written = 0; ssize_t ret; - loff_t old_isize = i_size_read(inode); + loff_t old_isize; unsigned int ilock_flags = 0; const bool nowait = (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT); unsigned int bdp_flags = (nowait ? BDP_ASYNC : 0); @@ -1103,6 +1103,13 @@ ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *i) if (ret < 0) return ret; + /* + * We can only trust the isize with inode lock held, or it can race with + * other buffered writes and cause incorrect call of + * pagecache_isize_extended() to overwrite existing data. + */ + old_isize = i_size_read(inode); + ret = generic_write_checks(iocb, i); if (ret <= 0) goto out;

6 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: hugetlb: Fix huge_ptep_get_and_clear() for non-present" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 49c87f7677746f3c5bd16c81b23700bb6b88bfd4 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025030455-exciting-thud-3720@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 49c87f7677746f3c5bd16c81b23700bb6b88bfd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 12:06:52 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: hugetlb: Fix huge_ptep_get_and_clear() for non-present ptes arm64 supports multiple huge_pte sizes. Some of the sizes are covered by a single pte entry at a particular level (PMD_SIZE, PUD_SIZE), and some are covered by multiple ptes at a particular level (CONT_PTE_SIZE, CONT_PMD_SIZE). So the function has to figure out the size from the huge_pte pointer. This was previously done by walking the pgtable to determine the level and by using the PTE_CONT bit to determine the number of ptes at the level. But the PTE_CONT bit is only valid when the pte is present. For non-present pte values (e.g. markers, migration entries), the previous implementation was therefore erroneously determining the size. There is at least one known caller in core-mm, move_huge_pte(), which may call huge_ptep_get_and_clear() for a non-present pte. So we must be robust to this case. Additionally the "regular" ptep_get_and_clear() is robust to being called for non-present ptes so it makes sense to follow the behavior. Fix this by using the new sz parameter which is now provided to the function. Additionally when clearing each pte in a contig range, don't gather the access and dirty bits if the pte is not present. An alternative approach that would not require API changes would be to store the PTE_CONT bit in a spare bit in the swap entry pte for the non-present case. But it felt cleaner to follow other APIs' lead and just pass in the size. As an aside, PTE_CONT is bit 52, which corresponds to bit 40 in the swap entry offset field (layout of non-present pte). Since hugetlb is never swapped to disk, this field will only be populated for markers, which always set this bit to 0 and hwpoison swap entries, which set the offset field to a PFN; So it would only ever be 1 for a 52-bit PVA system where memory in that high half was poisoned (I think!). So in practice, this bit would almost always be zero for non-present ptes and we would only clear the first entry if it was actually a contiguous block. That's probably a less severe symptom than if it was always interpreted as 1 and cleared out potentially-present neighboring PTEs. Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Fixes: 66b3923a1a0f ("arm64: hugetlb: add support for PTE contiguous bit") Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas(a)arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250226120656.2400136-3-ryan.roberts@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will(a)kernel.org> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c index 06db4649af91..b3a7fafe8892 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c @@ -100,20 +100,11 @@ static int find_num_contig(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, static inline int num_contig_ptes(unsigned long size, size_t *pgsize) { - int contig_ptes = 0; + int contig_ptes = 1; *pgsize = size; switch (size) { -#ifndef __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED - case PUD_SIZE: - if (pud_sect_supported()) - contig_ptes = 1; - break; -#endif - case PMD_SIZE: - contig_ptes = 1; - break; case CONT_PMD_SIZE: *pgsize = PMD_SIZE; contig_ptes = CONT_PMDS; @@ -122,6 +113,8 @@ static inline int num_contig_ptes(unsigned long size, size_t *pgsize) *pgsize = PAGE_SIZE; contig_ptes = CONT_PTES; break; + default: + WARN_ON(!__hugetlb_valid_size(size)); } return contig_ptes; @@ -163,24 +156,23 @@ static pte_t get_clear_contig(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long pgsize, unsigned long ncontig) { - pte_t orig_pte = __ptep_get(ptep); - unsigned long i; + pte_t pte, tmp_pte; + bool present; - for (i = 0; i < ncontig; i++, addr += pgsize, ptep++) { - pte_t pte = __ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, ptep); - - /* - * If HW_AFDBM is enabled, then the HW could turn on - * the dirty or accessed bit for any page in the set, - * so check them all. - */ - if (pte_dirty(pte)) - orig_pte = pte_mkdirty(orig_pte); - - if (pte_young(pte)) - orig_pte = pte_mkyoung(orig_pte); + pte = __ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, ptep); + present = pte_present(pte); + while (--ncontig) { + ptep++; + addr += pgsize; + tmp_pte = __ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, ptep); + if (present) { + if (pte_dirty(tmp_pte)) + pte = pte_mkdirty(pte); + if (pte_young(tmp_pte)) + pte = pte_mkyoung(pte); + } } - return orig_pte; + return pte; } static pte_t get_clear_contig_flush(struct mm_struct *mm, @@ -401,13 +393,8 @@ pte_t huge_ptep_get_and_clear(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, { int ncontig; size_t pgsize; - pte_t orig_pte = __ptep_get(ptep); - - if (!pte_cont(orig_pte)) - return __ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, ptep); - - ncontig = find_num_contig(mm, addr, ptep, &pgsize); + ncontig = num_contig_ptes(sz, &pgsize); return get_clear_contig(mm, addr, ptep, pgsize, ncontig); }

6 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror March 2025