- Linux-kselftest-mirror - lists.linaro.org

[PATCH] selftests: netfilter: Add RFC-7597 Section 5.1 PSID selftests

by Cole Dishington

Add selftests for masquerading into a smaller subset of ports defined by PSID. Signed-off-by: Cole Dishington <Cole.Dishington(a)alliedtelesis.co.nz> --- .../netfilter/nat_masquerade_psid.sh | 158 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 158 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/netfilter/nat_masquerade_psid.sh diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/netfilter/nat_masquerade_psid.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/netfilter/nat_masquerade_psid.sh new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..90e2e5ca4d68 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/netfilter/nat_masquerade_psid.sh @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +#!/bin/bash +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +# +# <:copyright-gpl +# Copyright (C) 2021 Allied Telesis Labs NZ +# +# check that NAT can masquerade using PSID defined ranges. +# +# Setup is: +# +# nsclient1(veth0) -> (veth1)nsrouter(veth2) -> (veth0)nsclient2 +# Setup a nat masquerade rule with psid defined ranges. +# + +# Kselftest framework requirement - SKIP code is 4. +ksft_skip=4 +ret=0 +ns_all="nsclient1 nsrouter nsclient2" + +readonly infile="$(mktemp)" +readonly outfile="$(mktemp)" +readonly datalen=32 +readonly server_port=8080 + +conntrack -V > /dev/null 2>&1 +if [ $? -ne 0 ];then + echo "SKIP: Could not run test without conntrack tool" + exit $ksft_skip +fi + +iptables --version > /dev/null 2>&1 +if [ $? -ne 0 ];then + echo "SKIP: Could not run test without iptables tool" + exit $ksft_skip +fi + +ip -Version > /dev/null 2>&1 +if [ $? -ne 0 ];then + echo "SKIP: Could not run test without ip tool" + exit $ksft_skip +fi + +ipv4() { + echo -n 192.168.$1.$2 +} + +cleanup() { + for n in $ns_all; do ip netns del $n;done + + if [ -f "${outfile}" ]; then + rm "$outfile" + fi + if [ -f "${infile}" ]; then + rm "$infile" + fi +} + +server_listen() { + ip netns exec nsclient2 nc -l -p "$server_port" > "$outfile" & + server_pid=$! + sleep 0.2 +} + +client_connect() { + ip netns exec nsclient1 timeout 2 nc -w 1 -p "$port" $(ipv4 2 2) "$server_port" < $infile +} + +verify_data() { + local _ret=0 + wait "$server_pid" + cmp "$infile" "$outfile" 2>/dev/null + _ret=$? + rm "$outfile" + return $_ret +} + +test_service() { + server_listen + client_connect + verify_data +} + +check_connection() { + entry=$(ip netns exec nsrouter conntrack -p tcp --sport $port -L 2>&1) + entry=${entry##*sport=8080 dport=} + entry=${entry%% *} + [[ "x$(( ($entry & $psid_mask) / $two_power_j ))" = "x$psid" ]] +} + +run_test() { + ip netns exec nsrouter iptables -A FORWARD -i veth1 -j ACCEPT + ip netns exec nsrouter iptables -P FORWARD DROP + ip netns exec nsrouter iptables -A FORWARD -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT + ip netns exec nsrouter iptables -t nat --new psid + ip netns exec nsrouter iptables -t nat --insert psid -j MASQUERADE --psid $offset:$psid:$psid_length + ip netns exec nsrouter iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -o veth2 -j psid + + # calculate psid mask + two_power_j=$(( $offset / (1 << $psid_length) )) + psid_mask=$(( ( (1 << $psid_length) - 1) * $two_power_j )) + + # Create file + dd if=/dev/urandom of="${infile}" bs="${datalen}" count=1 >/dev/null 2>&1 + + # Test multiple ports + for p in 1 2 3 4 5; do + port=1080$p + + test_service + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + ret=1 + break + fi + + check_connection + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + ret=1 + break + fi + done + + # tidy up test rules + ip netns exec nsrouter iptables -F + ip netns exec nsrouter iptables -t nat -F + ip netns exec nsrouter iptables -t nat -X psid +} + +for n in $ns_all; do + ip netns add $n + ip -net $n link set lo up +done + +for i in 1 2; do + ip link add veth0 netns nsclient$i type veth peer name veth$i netns nsrouter + + ip -net nsclient$i link set veth0 up + ip -net nsclient$i addr add $(ipv4 $i 2)/24 dev veth0 + + ip -net nsrouter link set veth$i up + ip -net nsrouter addr add $(ipv4 $i 1)/24 dev veth$i +done + +ip -net nsclient1 route add default via $(ipv4 1 1) +ip -net nsclient2 route add default via $(ipv4 2 1) + +ip netns exec nsrouter sysctl -q net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding=1 + +offset=1024 +psid_length=8 +for psid in 0 52; do + run_test + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + break + fi +done + +cleanup +exit $ret -- 2.32.0

3 years, 12 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH net-next v3 0/3] add benchmark selftest and optimization for ptr_ring

by Yunsheng Lin

Patch 1: add a selftest app to benchmark the performance of ptr_ring. Patch 2: move r->queue[] clearing after r->consumer_head updating. Patch 3: add barrier to ensure the visiblity of r->queue[]. V3: add patch 3 and address most of Michael's comment. V2: add patch 1 and add performance data for patch 2. --- Performance raw data using "perf stat -r" cmd, comparison is also done in patch 2/3. ptr_ring_test_org: patch 1 ptr_ring_test_opt1: patch 1 + patch 2 ptr_ring_test_opt2: patch 1 + patch 2 + patch 3 x86_64(as there is other workload in the x86_64 system, so run 1000 times to get more accurate result): Performance counter stats for './ptr_ring_test_org -s 1000 -m 1 -N 100000000' (1000 runs): 5,291.83 msec task-clock # 1.994 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.41% ) 690 context-switches # 0.130 K/sec ( +- 3.65% ) 8 cpu-migrations # 0.002 K/sec ( +- 5.70% ) 291 page-faults # 0.055 K/sec ( +- 0.05% ) 12,660,040,758 cycles # 2.392 GHz ( +- 0.41% ) 24,202,160,722 instructions # 1.91 insn per cycle ( +- 0.06% ) 3,559,123,597 branches # 672.569 M/sec ( +- 0.07% ) 8,009,010 branch-misses # 0.23% of all branches ( +- 0.11% ) 2.6538 +- 0.0109 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.41% ) Performance counter stats for './ptr_ring_test_opt1 -s 1000 -m 1 -N 100000000' (1000 runs): 5,064.95 msec task-clock # 1.992 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.55% ) 668 context-switches # 0.132 K/sec ( +- 4.20% ) 9 cpu-migrations # 0.002 K/sec ( +- 4.45% ) 291 page-faults # 0.057 K/sec ( +- 0.06% ) 12,117,262,182 cycles # 2.392 GHz ( +- 0.55% ) 22,586,035,716 instructions # 1.86 insn per cycle ( +- 0.08% ) 3,404,652,345 branches # 672.199 M/sec ( +- 0.10% ) 7,864,190 branch-misses # 0.23% of all branches ( +- 0.16% ) 2.5422 +- 0.0142 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.56% ) Performance counter stats for './ptr_ring_test_opt2 -s 1000 -m 1 -N 100000000' (1000 runs): 5,105.33 msec task-clock # 1.995 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.47% ) 589 context-switches # 0.115 K/sec ( +- 4.24% ) 11 cpu-migrations # 0.002 K/sec ( +- 4.24% ) 292 page-faults # 0.057 K/sec ( +- 0.04% ) 12,214,160,307 cycles # 2.392 GHz ( +- 0.47% ) 22,756,292,370 instructions # 1.86 insn per cycle ( +- 0.10% ) 3,429,218,233 branches # 671.694 M/sec ( +- 0.12% ) 7,921,984 branch-misses # 0.23% of all branches ( +- 0.15% ) 2.5587 +- 0.0122 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.47% ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- arm64(using taskset to avoid the numa effects): Performance counter stats for 'taskset -c 0-1 ./ptr_ring_test_org -s 1000 -m 1 -N 100000000' (100 runs): 4172.83 msec task-clock # 1.999 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.01% ) 54 context-switches # 0.013 K/sec ( +- 0.29% ) 1 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec 115 page-faults # 0.028 K/sec ( +- 0.16% ) 10848085945 cycles # 2.600 GHz ( +- 0.01% ) 25808501369 instructions # 2.38 insn per cycle ( +- 0.00% ) <not supported> branches 11190266 branch-misses ( +- 0.02% ) 2.087205 +- 0.000130 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.01% ) Performance counter stats for 'taskset -c 0-1 ./ptr_ring_test_opt1 -s 1000 -m 1 -N 100000000' (100 runs): 3774.91 msec task-clock # 1.999 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.03% ) 50 context-switches # 0.013 K/sec ( +- 0.36% ) 1 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec 114 page-faults # 0.030 K/sec ( +- 0.15% ) 9813658996 cycles # 2.600 GHz ( +- 0.03% ) 23920189000 instructions # 2.44 insn per cycle ( +- 0.01% ) <not supported> branches 10018927 branch-misses ( +- 0.04% ) 1.888224 +- 0.000541 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.03% ) Performance counter stats for 'taskset -c 0-1 ./ptr_ring_test_opt2 -s 1000 -m 1 -N 100000000' (100 runs): 3785.79 msec task-clock # 1.999 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.03% ) 49 context-switches # 0.013 K/sec ( +- 0.32% ) 1 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec 114 page-faults # 0.030 K/sec ( +- 0.15% ) 9842067534 cycles # 2.600 GHz ( +- 0.03% ) 24074397270 instructions # 2.45 insn per cycle ( +- 0.01% ) <not supported> branches 10091918 branch-misses ( +- 0.04% ) 1.893673 +- 0.000508 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.03% ) Yunsheng Lin (3): selftests/ptr_ring: add benchmark application for ptr_ring ptr_ring: move r->queue[] clearing after r->consumer_head updating ptr_ring: add barrier to ensure the visiblity of r->queue[] MAINTAINERS | 5 + include/linux/ptr_ring.h | 52 ++++-- tools/testing/selftests/ptr_ring/Makefile | 6 + tools/testing/selftests/ptr_ring/ptr_ring_test.c | 224 +++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/ptr_ring/ptr_ring_test.h | 130 +++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 399 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ptr_ring/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ptr_ring/ptr_ring_test.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ptr_ring/ptr_ring_test.h -- 2.7.4

3 years, 12 months

3
14
0 0

[PATCH 0/4] selftests: add a new test driver for sysfs

by Luis Chamberlain

I had posted a patch to fix a theoretical race with sysfs and device removal [0]. While the issue is no longer present with the patch present, the zram driver has already a lot of enhancements, so much so, that the race alone is very difficult to reproduce. Likewise, the zram driver had a series of other races on module removal which I recently posted fixes for [1], and it makes it unclear if these paper over the possible theoretical sysfs race. Although we even have gdb output from an actual race where this issue presented itself, there are other races which could happen before that and so what we realy need is a clean separate driver where we can experiment and try to reproduce unusual races. This adds such a driver, a new sysfs_test driver, along with a set of new tests for it. We take hint of observed issues with the sysfs on the zram driver, and build sandbox based where wher can try to poke holes at the kernel with. There are two main races we're after trying to reproduce: 1) proving the deadlock is real 2) allowing for enough slack for us to try to see if we can reproduce the syfs / device removal race In order to tackle the second race, we need a bit of help from kernefs, given that the race is difficult to reproduce. So we add fault injection support to kernfs, which allows us to trigger all possible races on write. This should be enough evidence for us to drop the suggested patch for sysfs for the second race. The first race however which leads to a deadlock is clearly explained now and I hope this shows how we need a generic solution. [0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623215007.862787-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210702043716.2692247-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Luis Chamberlain (4): selftests: add tests_sysfs module kernfs: add initial failure injection support test_sysfs: add support to use kernfs failure injection test_sysfs: demonstrate deadlock fix .../fault-injection/fault-injection.rst | 22 + MAINTAINERS | 9 +- fs/kernfs/Makefile | 1 + fs/kernfs/failure-injection.c | 82 + fs/kernfs/file.c | 13 + fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h | 73 + include/linux/kernfs.h | 5 + lib/Kconfig.debug | 23 + lib/Makefile | 1 + lib/test_sysfs.c | 1037 +++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/sysfs/Makefile | 12 + tools/testing/selftests/sysfs/config | 5 + tools/testing/selftests/sysfs/sysfs.sh | 1376 +++++++++++++++++ 13 files changed, 2658 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 fs/kernfs/failure-injection.c create mode 100644 lib/test_sysfs.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sysfs/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sysfs/config create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/sysfs/sysfs.sh -- 2.27.0

3 years, 12 months

3
9
0 0

Re: [GIT PULL] KUnit update for Linux 5.14-rc1

by pr-tracker-bot＠kernel.org

The pull request you sent on Fri, 2 Jul 2021 10:09:18 -0600: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest tags/linux-kselftest-kunit-fixes-5.14-rc1 has been merged into torvalds/linux.git: https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/a48ad6e7a35dc3f3b521249204daf4c9427628e5 Thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/prtracker.html

3 years, 12 months

1
0
0 0

[GIT PULL] Kselftest update for Linux 5.14-rc1

by Shuah Khan

Hi Linus, Please pull the following Kselftest update for Linux 5.14-rc1. This Kselftest update for Linux 5.14-rc1 consists of fixes to existing tests and framework: -- migrate sgx test to kselftest harness -- add new test cases to sgx test -- ftrace test fix event-no-pid on 1-core machine -- splice test adjust for handler fallback removal diff is attached. Apologies if this message appears to have double spacing. My email client is at fault - I am trying to figure out what changed. thanks, -- Shuah ---------------------------------------------------------------- The following changes since commit d07f6ca923ea0927a1024dfccafc5b53b61cfecc: Linux 5.13-rc2 (2021-05-16 15:27:44 -0700) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest tags/linux-kselftest-next-5.14-rc1 for you to fetch changes up to 4896df9d53ae5521f3ce83751e828ad70bc65c80: selftests/sgx: remove checks for file execute permissions (2021-06-23 18:38:04 -0600) ---------------------------------------------------------------- linux-kselftest-next-5.14-rc1 This Kselftest update for Linux 5.14-rc1 consists of fixes to existing tests and framework: -- migrate sgx test to kselftest harness -- add new test cases to sgx test -- ftrace test fix event-no-pid on 1-core machine -- splice test adjust for handler fallback removal ---------------------------------------------------------------- Dave Hansen (1): selftests/sgx: remove checks for file execute permissions Jarkko Sakkinen (5): selftests/sgx: Rename 'eenter' and 'sgx_call_vdso' selftests/sgx: Migrate to kselftest harness selftests/sgx: Dump enclave memory map selftests/sgx: Add EXPECT_EEXIT() macro selftests/sgx: Refine the test enclave to have storage Kees Cook (3): selftests/tls: Add {} to avoid static checker warning selftests: splice: Adjust for handler fallback removal selftests: lib.mk: Also install "config" and "settings" Krzysztof Kozlowski (1): selftests/ftrace: fix event-no-pid on 1-core machine Po-Hsu Lin (1): selftests: timers: rtcpie: skip test if default RTC device does not exist Xiaochen Shen (1): selftests/resctrl: Fix incorrect parsing of option "-t" .../selftests/ftrace/test.d/event/event-no-pid.tc | 7 + tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c | 3 +- tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/README | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c | 4 +- tools/testing/selftests/sgx/call.S | 6 +- tools/testing/selftests/sgx/defines.h | 10 + tools/testing/selftests/sgx/load.c | 19 +- tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c | 239 +++++++++++++-------- tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.h | 4 +- tools/testing/selftests/sgx/test_encl.c | 19 +- tools/testing/selftests/sgx/test_encl.lds | 3 +- .../testing/selftests/splice/short_splice_read.sh | 119 ++++++++-- tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtcpie.c | 10 +- 14 files changed, 308 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-) ----------------------------------------------------------------

3 years, 12 months

2
1
0 0

[PATCH] KVM: selftests: do not require 64GB in set_memory_region_test

by Christian Borntraeger

Unless the user sets overcommit_memory or has plenty of swap, the latest changes to the testcase will result in ENOMEM failures for hosts with less than 64GB RAM. As we do not use much of the allocated memory, we can use MAP_NORESERVE to avoid this error. Cc: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui(a)huawei.com> Cc: vkuznets(a)redhat.com Cc: wanghaibin.wang(a)huawei.com Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Fixes: 309505dd5685 ("KVM: selftests: Fix mapping length truncation in m{,un}map()") Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger(a)de.ibm.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c index d8812f27648c..d31f54ac4e98 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c @@ -377,7 +377,8 @@ static void test_add_max_memory_regions(void) (max_mem_slots - 1), MEM_REGION_SIZE >> 10); mem = mmap(NULL, (size_t)max_mem_slots * MEM_REGION_SIZE + alignment, - PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0); + PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, + MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_NORESERVE, -1, 0); TEST_ASSERT(mem != MAP_FAILED, "Failed to mmap() host"); mem_aligned = (void *)(((size_t) mem + alignment - 1) & ~(alignment - 1)); -- 2.31.1

3 years, 12 months

2
1
0 0

[PATCH] selftests/memfd: remove unused variable

by Greg Thelen

Commit 544029862cbb ("selftests/memfd: add tests for F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal") added an unused variable to mfd_assert_reopen_fd(). Delete the unused variable. Fixes: 544029862cbb ("selftests/memfd: add tests for F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal") Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen(a)google.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c index 74baab83fec3..192a2899bae8 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static int mfd_assert_new(const char *name, loff_t sz, unsigned int flags) static int mfd_assert_reopen_fd(int fd_in) { - int r, fd; + int fd; char path[100]; sprintf(path, "/proc/self/fd/%d", fd_in); -- 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog

3 years, 12 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v2] kunit: tool: Fix error messages for cases of no tests and wrong TAP header

by Rae Moar

This patch addresses misleading error messages reported by kunit_tool in two cases. First, in the case of TAP output having an incorrect header format or missing a header, the parser used to output an error message of 'no tests run!'. Now the parser outputs an error message of 'could not parse test results!'. As an example: Before: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse /dev/null [ERROR] no tests run! ... After: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse /dev/null [ERROR] could not parse test results! ... Second, in the case of TAP output with the correct header but no tests, the parser used to output an error message of 'could not parse test results!'. Now the parser outputs an error message of 'no tests run!'. As an example: Before: $ echo -e 'TAP version 14\n1..0' | ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse [ERROR] could not parse test results! After: $ echo -e 'TAP version 14\n1..0' | ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse [ERROR] no tests run! Additionally, this patch also corrects the tests in kunit_tool_test.py and adds a test to check the error in the case of TAP output with the correct header but no tests. Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov(a)google.com> --- V1 -> V2: * Simplified log for the test for TAP output with the correct header but no tests * Added examples in commit message of error messages before and after --- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py | 6 ++++-- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 16 +++++++++++++--- ...st_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_no_header.log} | 0 ...t_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_with_header.log | 2 ++ 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) rename tools/testing/kunit/test_data/{test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run.log => test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_no_header.log} (100%) create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_with_header.log diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py index c3c524b79db8..b88db3f51dc5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py @@ -338,9 +338,11 @@ def bubble_up_suite_errors(test_suites: Iterable[TestSuite]) -> TestStatus: def parse_test_result(lines: LineStream) -> TestResult: consume_non_diagnostic(lines) if not lines or not parse_tap_header(lines): - return TestResult(TestStatus.NO_TESTS, [], lines) + return TestResult(TestStatus.FAILURE_TO_PARSE_TESTS, [], lines) expected_test_suite_num = parse_test_plan(lines) - if not expected_test_suite_num: + if expected_test_suite_num == 0: + return TestResult(TestStatus.NO_TESTS, [], lines) + elif expected_test_suite_num is None: return TestResult(TestStatus.FAILURE_TO_PARSE_TESTS, [], lines) test_suites = [] for i in range(1, expected_test_suite_num + 1): diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py index bdae0e5f6197..75045aa0f8a1 100755 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py @@ -157,8 +157,18 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): kunit_parser.TestStatus.FAILURE, result.status) + def test_no_header(self): + empty_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_no_header.log') + with open(empty_log) as file: + result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests( + kunit_parser.extract_tap_lines(file.readlines())) + self.assertEqual(0, len(result.suites)) + self.assertEqual( + kunit_parser.TestStatus.FAILURE_TO_PARSE_TESTS, + result.status) + def test_no_tests(self): - empty_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run.log') + empty_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_with_header.log') with open(empty_log) as file: result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests( kunit_parser.extract_tap_lines(file.readlines())) @@ -173,7 +183,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): with open(crash_log) as file: result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests( kunit_parser.extract_tap_lines(file.readlines())) - print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('no tests run!')) + print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('could not parse test results!')) print_mock.stop() file.close() @@ -309,7 +319,7 @@ class KUnitJsonTest(unittest.TestCase): result["sub_groups"][1]["test_cases"][0]) def test_no_tests_json(self): - result = self._json_for('test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run.log') + result = self._json_for('test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_with_header.log') self.assertEqual(0, len(result['sub_groups'])) class StrContains(str): diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run.log b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_no_header.log similarity index 100% rename from tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run.log rename to tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_no_header.log diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_with_header.log b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_with_header.log new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..5f48ee659d40 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_with_header.log @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +TAP version 14 +1..0 -- 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog

4 years

2
1
0 0

[PATCH v8 0/7] Syscall User Dispatch

by Gabriel Krisman Bertazi

Hi, This is v8 of syscall user dispatch. Last version got some acks but there was one small documentation fix I wanted to do, as requested by Florian. This also addresses the commit message fixup Peter requested. The only actual code change from v7 is solving a trivial merge conflict I myself created with the entry code fixup I made week and with something else in the TIP tree. I also shared this with glibc and there wasn't any complaints other than the matter about user-notif vs. siginfo, which was discussed in v7 and the understanding is that it is not necessary now and can be added later, if needed, on the same infrastructure without a new api. I'm not sure about TIP the rules, but is it too late to be queued for the next merge window? I'd love to have this in 5.11 if possible, since it has been flying for quite a while. This is based on tip/master. As usual, a working tree with this patchset is available at: https://gitlab.collabora.com/krisman/linux -b syscall-user-dispatch-v8 Previous submissions are archived at: RFC/v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/8/96 v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/9/17 v3: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/12/4 v4: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-kselftest/msg16377.html v5: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/10/1320 v6: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/9/4/1122 v7: https://lwn.net/Articles/837598/ Gabriel Krisman Bertazi (7): x86: vdso: Expose sigreturn address on vdso to the kernel signal: Expose SYS_USER_DISPATCH si_code type kernel: Implement selective syscall userspace redirection entry: Support Syscall User Dispatch on common syscall entry selftests: Add kselftest for syscall user dispatch selftests: Add benchmark for syscall user dispatch docs: Document Syscall User Dispatch .../admin-guide/syscall-user-dispatch.rst | 87 +++++ arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso2c.c | 2 + arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S | 2 + arch/x86/entry/vdso/vma.c | 15 + arch/x86/include/asm/elf.h | 2 + arch/x86/include/asm/vdso.h | 2 + arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c | 2 +- fs/exec.c | 3 + include/linux/entry-common.h | 2 + include/linux/sched.h | 2 + include/linux/syscall_user_dispatch.h | 40 +++ include/linux/thread_info.h | 2 + include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h | 3 +- include/uapi/linux/prctl.h | 5 + kernel/entry/Makefile | 2 +- kernel/entry/common.c | 17 + kernel/entry/common.h | 16 + kernel/entry/syscall_user_dispatch.c | 102 ++++++ kernel/fork.c | 1 + kernel/sys.c | 5 + tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 1 + .../syscall_user_dispatch/.gitignore | 3 + .../selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/Makefile | 9 + .../selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/config | 1 + .../syscall_user_dispatch/sud_benchmark.c | 200 +++++++++++ .../syscall_user_dispatch/sud_test.c | 310 ++++++++++++++++++ 26 files changed, 833 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/admin-guide/syscall-user-dispatch.rst create mode 100644 include/linux/syscall_user_dispatch.h create mode 100644 kernel/entry/common.h create mode 100644 kernel/entry/syscall_user_dispatch.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/.gitignore create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/config create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/sud_benchmark.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/sud_test.c -- 2.29.2

4 years

6
17
0 0

[PATCH] kunit: tool: Fix error messages for cases of no tests and wrong TAP header

by Rae Moar

This patch addresses misleading error messages reported by kunit_tool in two cases. First, in the case of TAP output having an incorrect header format or missing a header, the parser used to output an error message of 'no tests run!'. Now the parser outputs an error message of 'could not parse test results!'. As an example: Before: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse /dev/null [ERROR] no tests run! ... After: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse /dev/null [ERROR] could not parse test results! ... Second, in the case of TAP output with the correct header but no tests, the parser used to output an error message of 'could not parse test results!'. Now the parser outputs an error message of 'no tests run!'. As an example: Before: $ echo -e 'TAP version 14\n1..0' | ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse [ERROR] could not parse test results! After: $ echo -e 'TAP version 14\n1..0' | ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse [ERROR] no tests run! Additionally, this patch also corrects the tests in kunit_tool_test.py and adds a test to check the error in the case of TAP output with the correct header but no tests (the log for this test was simplified from the first version of this patch). Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar(a)google.com> --- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py | 6 ++++-- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 16 +++++++++++++--- ...st_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_no_header.log} | 0 ...t_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_with_header.log | 2 ++ 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) rename tools/testing/kunit/test_data/{test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run.log => test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_no_header.log} (100%) create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_with_header.log diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py index c3c524b79db8..b88db3f51dc5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py @@ -338,9 +338,11 @@ def bubble_up_suite_errors(test_suites: Iterable[TestSuite]) -> TestStatus: def parse_test_result(lines: LineStream) -> TestResult: consume_non_diagnostic(lines) if not lines or not parse_tap_header(lines): - return TestResult(TestStatus.NO_TESTS, [], lines) + return TestResult(TestStatus.FAILURE_TO_PARSE_TESTS, [], lines) expected_test_suite_num = parse_test_plan(lines) - if not expected_test_suite_num: + if expected_test_suite_num == 0: + return TestResult(TestStatus.NO_TESTS, [], lines) + elif expected_test_suite_num is None: return TestResult(TestStatus.FAILURE_TO_PARSE_TESTS, [], lines) test_suites = [] for i in range(1, expected_test_suite_num + 1): diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py index bdae0e5f6197..75045aa0f8a1 100755 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py @@ -157,8 +157,18 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): kunit_parser.TestStatus.FAILURE, result.status) + def test_no_header(self): + empty_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_no_header.log') + with open(empty_log) as file: + result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests( + kunit_parser.extract_tap_lines(file.readlines())) + self.assertEqual(0, len(result.suites)) + self.assertEqual( + kunit_parser.TestStatus.FAILURE_TO_PARSE_TESTS, + result.status) + def test_no_tests(self): - empty_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run.log') + empty_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_with_header.log') with open(empty_log) as file: result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests( kunit_parser.extract_tap_lines(file.readlines())) @@ -173,7 +183,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): with open(crash_log) as file: result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests( kunit_parser.extract_tap_lines(file.readlines())) - print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('no tests run!')) + print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('could not parse test results!')) print_mock.stop() file.close() @@ -309,7 +319,7 @@ class KUnitJsonTest(unittest.TestCase): result["sub_groups"][1]["test_cases"][0]) def test_no_tests_json(self): - result = self._json_for('test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run.log') + result = self._json_for('test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_with_header.log') self.assertEqual(0, len(result['sub_groups'])) class StrContains(str): diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run.log b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_no_header.log similarity index 100% rename from tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run.log rename to tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_no_header.log diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_with_header.log b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_with_header.log new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..5f48ee659d40 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_with_header.log @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +TAP version 14 +1..0 -- 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog

4 years

2
1
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror