- Linux-kselftest-mirror - lists.linaro.org

[PATCH 1/2] selftests/lkdtm: add config and turn off CFI_FORWARD_PROTO

by Muhammad Usama Anjum

Add config options which are needed for LKDTM sub-tests. STACKLEAK_ERASING test needs GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK config. READ_AFTER_FREE and READ_BUDDY_AFTER_FREE tests need INIT_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON config. CFI_FORWARD_PROTO always fails as there is no active CFI system of some kind. Turn it off for now by default until proper support. Cc: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Fixes: 46d1a0f03d66 ("selftests/lkdtm: Add tests for LKDTM targets") Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/config | 2 ++ tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/tests.txt | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/config b/tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/config index 46f39ee762086..adc9fa60057c5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/config +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/config @@ -2,8 +2,10 @@ CONFIG_LKDTM=y CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST=y CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED=y CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y +CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK=y CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY=y CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET_DEFAULT=y +CONFIG_INIT_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON=y CONFIG_INIT_ON_ALLOC_DEFAULT_ON=y CONFIG_UBSAN=y CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS=y diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/tests.txt b/tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/tests.txt index 6b36b7f5dcf96..aa947b0ce1eeb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/tests.txt +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/tests.txt @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND USERCOPY_KERNEL STACKLEAK_ERASING OK: the rest of the thread stack is properly erased -CFI_FORWARD_PROTO +#CFI_FORWARD_PROTO FORTIFIED_STRSCPY FORTIFIED_OBJECT FORTIFIED_SUBOBJECT -- 2.30.2

3 years, 5 months

2
14
0 0

opportunity

by Allen S

Hello, I lead family investment vehicles who want to invest a proportion of their funds with a trust party . Please if you are interested in discussing investment in your sector? Please email, or simply write to me here. I value promptness and will make every attempt to respond within a short time. Thank you. Allen S.

3 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

Hello,

by Seyba Daniel

Hello, I am so sorry contacting you in this means especially when we have never met before. I urgently seek your service to represent me in investing in your region / country and you will be rewarded for your service without affecting your present job with very little time invested in it. My interest is in buying real estate, private schools or companies with potentials for rapid growth in long terms. So please confirm interest by responding back. My dearest regards Seyba Daniel

3 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

[GIT PULL] Kselftest update for Linux 5.18-rc3

by Shuah Khan

Hi Linus, Please pull the following Kselftest update for Linux 5.18-rc3. This Kselftest fixes update consists of a mqueue perf test memory leak bug fix. mq_perf_tests fail to call CPU_FREE to free memory allocated by CPU_SET. diff is attached. thanks, -- Shuah ---------------------------------------------------------------- The following changes since commit 79ee8aa31d518c1fd5f3b1b1ac39dd1fb4dc7039: selftests/harness: Pass variant to teardown (2022-04-04 13:37:48 -0600) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest tags/linux-kselftest-fixes-5.18-rc3 for you to fetch changes up to ce64763c63854b4079f2e036638aa881a1fb3fbc: testing/selftests/mqueue: Fix mq_perf_tests to free the allocated cpu set (2022-04-12 13:54:49 -0600) ---------------------------------------------------------------- linux-kselftest-fixes-5.18-rc3 This Kselftest fixes update consists of a mqueue perf test memory leak bug fix. mq_perf_tests fail to call CPU_FREE to free memory allocated by CPU_SET. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Athira Rajeev (1): testing/selftests/mqueue: Fix mq_perf_tests to free the allocated cpu set tools/testing/selftests/mqueue/mq_perf_tests.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) ----------------------------------------------------------------

3 years, 5 months

2
1
0 0

[PATCH] Makefile: Fix separate output directory build of kselftests

by Muhammad Usama Anjum

Build of kselftests fail if kernel's top most Makefile is used for running or building kselftests with separate output directory. The absolute path is needed to reference other files during this kind of build. Set KBUILD_ABS_SRCTREE to use absolute path during the build. It fixes the following different types of errors: make kselftest-all O=/linux_mainline/build Makefile:1080: ../scripts/Makefile.extrawarn: No such file or directory make kselftest-all O=build Makefile:1080: ../scripts/Makefile.extrawarn: No such file or directory Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> --- I've tested this patch on top of next-20220217. The latest next-20220222 have missing patches. --- Makefile | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 86f633c2809ea..62b3eb8a102ab 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -1411,10 +1411,10 @@ tools/%: FORCE PHONY += kselftest kselftest: - $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests run_tests + $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests KBUILD_ABS_SRCTREE=1 run_tests kselftest-%: FORCE - $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests $* + $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests KBUILD_ABS_SRCTREE=1 $* PHONY += kselftest-merge kselftest-merge: -- 2.30.2

3 years, 5 months

3
9
0 0

[RFC V1 PATCH 0/5] selftests: KVM: selftests for fd-based approach of supporting private memory

by Vishal Annapurve

This series implements selftests targeting the feature floated by Chao via: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220310140911.50924-1-chao.p.peng@linux.i… Below changes aim to test the fd based approach for guest private memory in context of normal (non-confidential) VMs executing on non-confidential platforms. Confidential platforms along with the confidentiality aware software stack support a notion of private/shared accesses from the confidential VMs. Generally, a bit in the GPA conveys the shared/private-ness of the access. Non-confidential platforms don't have a notion of private or shared accesses from the guest VMs. To support this notion, KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE is modified to allow marking an access from a VM within a GPA range as always shared or private. Any suggestions regarding implementing this ioctl alternatively/cleanly are appreciated. priv_memfd_test.c file adds a suite of two basic selftests to access private memory from the guest via private/shared access and checking if the contents can be leaked to/accessed by vmm via shared memory view. Test results: 1) PMPAT - PrivateMemoryPrivateAccess test passes 2) PMSAT - PrivateMemorySharedAccess test fails currently and needs more analysis to understand the reason of failure. Important - Below patch is needed to ensure host kernel crash is avoided while running these tests: https://github.com/vishals4gh/linux/commit/b9adedf777ad84af39042e9c19899600… Github link for the patches posted as part of this series: https://github.com/vishals4gh/linux/commits/priv_memfd_selftests_v1 Note that this series is dependent on Chao's v5 patches mentioned above applied on top of 5.17. Vishal Annapurve (5): x86: kvm: HACK: Allow testing of priv memfd approach selftests: kvm: Fix inline assembly for hypercall selftests: kvm: Add a basic selftest test priv memfd selftests: kvm: priv_memfd_test: Add support for memory conversion selftests: kvm: priv_memfd_test: Add shared access test arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h | 1 + arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 9 +- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 16 +- include/linux/kvm_host.h | 3 + tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 + .../selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/priv_memfd_test.c | 410 ++++++++++++++++++ virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 +- 8 files changed, 436 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/priv_memfd_test.c -- 2.35.1.1178.g4f1659d476-goog

3 years, 5 months

5
10
0 0

[PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf trampoline for arm64

by Xu Kuohai

Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as x86. Tested on qemu, result: #55 fentry_fexit:OK #56 fentry_test:OK #58 fexit_sleep:OK #59 fexit_stress:OK #60 fexit_test:OK #67 get_func_args_test:OK #68 get_func_ip_test:OK #101 modify_return:OK Xu Kuohai (5): arm64: ftrace: Add ftrace direct call support bpf: Move is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags() to the public trampoline code bpf, arm64: Impelment bpf_arch_text_poke() for arm64 bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64 selftests/bpf: Fix trivial typo in fentry_fexit.c arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 + arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h | 10 + arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 1 + arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S | 18 +- arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h | 14 +- arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 390 +++++++++++++++++- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 20 - include/linux/bpf.h | 5 + kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 4 +- kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 36 +- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c | 4 +- 11 files changed, 470 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) -- 2.30.2

3 years, 5 months

3
8
0 0

lkft kselftest for next-20220412

by lkft＠linaro.org

## Build * kernel: 5.18.0-rc2 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/next/linux-next * git branch: master * git commit: d0c745e7b2d6ce8bcc768b32361ab8ef520821ee * git describe: next-20220412 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20220412 ## Test Regressions (compared to next-20220408) No test regressions found. ## Metric Regressions (compared to next-20220408) No metric regressions found. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft(a)linaro.org> ## Test Fixes (compared to next-20220408) No test fixes found. ## Metric Fixes (compared to next-20220408) No metric fixes found. ## Test result summary total: 0, pass: 0, fail: 0, skip: 0, xfail: 0 ## Build Summary ## Test suites summary -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org

3 years, 5 months

2
1
0 0

kselftest/fixes kselftest-rtc: 4 runs, 1 regressions (linux-kselftest-fixes-5.18-rc2-1-gce64763c6385)

by kernelci.org bot

kselftest/fixes kselftest-rtc: 4 runs, 1 regressions (linux-kselftest-fixes-5.18-rc2-1-gce64763c6385) Regressions Summary ------------------- platform | arch | lab | compiler | defconfig | regressions -----------------+-------+---------------+----------+------------------------------+------------ rk3399-gru-kevin | arm64 | lab-collabora | gcc-10 | defconfig+kse...4-chromebook | 1 Details: https://kernelci.org/test/job/kselftest/branch/fixes/kernel/linux-kselftest… Test: kselftest-rtc Tree: kselftest Branch: fixes Describe: linux-kselftest-fixes-5.18-rc2-1-gce64763c6385 URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git SHA: ce64763c63854b4079f2e036638aa881a1fb3fbc Test Regressions ---------------- platform | arch | lab | compiler | defconfig | regressions -----------------+-------+---------------+----------+------------------------------+------------ rk3399-gru-kevin | arm64 | lab-collabora | gcc-10 | defconfig+kse...4-chromebook | 1 Details: https://kernelci.org/test/plan/id/6256d64e93f3050e2cae06a5 Results: 7 PASS, 3 FAIL, 8 SKIP Full config: defconfig+kselftest+arm64-chromebook Compiler: gcc-10 (aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110) Plain log: https://storage.kernelci.org//kselftest/fixes/linux-kselftest-fixes-5.18-rc… HTML log: https://storage.kernelci.org//kselftest/fixes/linux-kselftest-fixes-5.18-rc… Rootfs: http://storage.kernelci.org/images/rootfs/debian/bullseye-kselftest/2022040… * kselftest-rtc.rtc_rtctest_rtc_alarm_alm_set: https://kernelci.org/test/case/id/6256d64e93f3050e2cae06ab new failure (last pass: v5.18-rc1-7-g79ee8aa31d51)

3 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH] bpf/benchs: fix error check return value of bpf_program__attach()

by cgel.zte＠gmail.com

From: Lv Ruyi <lv.ruyi(a)zte.com.cn> bpf_program__attach() returns error ptr when it fails, so we should use IS_ERR() to check it in error handling path. The patch fix all the same problems in the bpf/benchs/*. Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci(a)zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Lv Ruyi <lv.ruyi(a)zte.com.cn> --- .../selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c | 10 +++++----- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bpf_loop.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_rename.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbufs.c | 6 +++--- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_strncmp.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c | 2 +- 6 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c index 5bcb8a8cdeb2..fd1be1042516 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static void bloom_lookup_setup(void) populate_maps(); link = bpf_program__attach(ctx.skel->progs.bloom_lookup); - if (!link) { + if (IS_ERR(link)) { fprintf(stderr, "failed to attach program!\n"); exit(1); } @@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ static void bloom_update_setup(void) populate_maps(); link = bpf_program__attach(ctx.skel->progs.bloom_update); - if (!link) { + if (IS_ERR(link)) { fprintf(stderr, "failed to attach program!\n"); exit(1); } @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static void false_positive_setup(void) populate_maps(); link = bpf_program__attach(ctx.skel->progs.bloom_hashmap_lookup); - if (!link) { + if (IS_ERR(link)) { fprintf(stderr, "failed to attach program!\n"); exit(1); } @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static void hashmap_with_bloom_setup(void) populate_maps(); link = bpf_program__attach(ctx.skel->progs.bloom_hashmap_lookup); - if (!link) { + if (IS_ERR(link)) { fprintf(stderr, "failed to attach program!\n"); exit(1); } @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static void hashmap_no_bloom_setup(void) populate_maps(); link = bpf_program__attach(ctx.skel->progs.bloom_hashmap_lookup); - if (!link) { + if (IS_ERR(link)) { fprintf(stderr, "failed to attach program!\n"); exit(1); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bpf_loop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bpf_loop.c index d0a6572bfab6..8dbdc28d26c8 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bpf_loop.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bpf_loop.c @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static void setup(void) } link = bpf_program__attach(ctx.skel->progs.benchmark); - if (!link) { + if (IS_ERR(link)) { fprintf(stderr, "failed to attach program!\n"); exit(1); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_rename.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_rename.c index 3c203b6d6a6e..66d63b92a28a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_rename.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_rename.c @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static void attach_bpf(struct bpf_program *prog) struct bpf_link *link; link = bpf_program__attach(prog); - if (!link) { + if (IS_ERR(link)) { fprintf(stderr, "failed to attach program!\n"); exit(1); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbufs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbufs.c index c2554f9695ff..fff24ca82dc0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbufs.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbufs.c @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static void ringbuf_libbpf_setup(void) } link = bpf_program__attach(ctx->skel->progs.bench_ringbuf); - if (!link) { + if (IS_ERR(link)) { fprintf(stderr, "failed to attach program!\n"); exit(1); } @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ static void ringbuf_custom_setup(void) } link = bpf_program__attach(ctx->skel->progs.bench_ringbuf); - if (!link) { + if (IS_ERR(link)) { fprintf(stderr, "failed to attach program\n"); exit(1); } @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ static void perfbuf_libbpf_setup(void) } link = bpf_program__attach(ctx->skel->progs.bench_perfbuf); - if (!link) { + if (IS_ERR(link)) { fprintf(stderr, "failed to attach program\n"); exit(1); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_strncmp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_strncmp.c index 494b591c0289..dcb9ce5ffcb0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_strncmp.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_strncmp.c @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void strncmp_attach_prog(struct bpf_program *prog) struct bpf_link *link; link = bpf_program__attach(prog); - if (!link) { + if (IS_ERR(link)) { fprintf(stderr, "failed to attach program!\n"); exit(1); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c index 0c481de2833d..bda930a8153c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static void attach_bpf(struct bpf_program *prog) struct bpf_link *link; link = bpf_program__attach(prog); - if (!link) { + if (IS_ERR(link)) { fprintf(stderr, "failed to attach program!\n"); exit(1); } -- 2.25.1

3 years, 5 months

2
1
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror