- Linux-kselftest-mirror - lists.linaro.org

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.18 45/93] kselftests: Enable the echo command to print newlines in Makefile

by Sasha Levin

From: Gautam <gautammenghani201(a)gmail.com> [ Upstream commit 3297a4df805d4263506b6dfec4d1bbeff8862dd8 ] In the install section of the main Makefile of kselftests, the echo command is used with -n flag, which disables the printing of new line due to which the output contains "\n" chars as follows: Emit Tests for alsa\nSkipping non-existent dir: arm64 Emit Tests for breakpoints\nEmit Tests for capabilities\n This patch fixes the above bug by using the -e flag. Signed-off-by: Gautam <gautammenghani201(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile index bd2ac8b3bf1f..197126a6614e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ ifdef INSTALL_PATH for TARGET in $(TARGETS); do \ BUILD_TARGET=$$BUILD/$$TARGET; \ [ ! -d $(INSTALL_PATH)/$$TARGET ] && echo "Skipping non-existent dir: $$TARGET" && continue; \ - echo -n "Emit Tests for $$TARGET\n"; \ + echo -ne "Emit Tests for $$TARGET\n"; \ $(MAKE) -s --no-print-directory OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET COLLECTION=$$TARGET \ -C $$TARGET emit_tests >> $(TEST_LIST); \ done; -- 2.35.1

3 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.18 26/93] selftests: mlxsw: resource_scale: Allow skipping a test

by Sasha Levin

From: Petr Machata <petrm(a)nvidia.com> [ Upstream commit 8cad339db339a39cb82b1188e4be4070a433abac ] The scale tests are currently testing two things: that some number of instances of a given resource can actually be created; and that when an attempt is made to create more than the supported amount, the failures are noted and handled gracefully. Sometimes the scale test depends on more than one resource. In particular, a following patch will add a RIF counter scale test, which depends on the number of RIF counters that can be bound, and also on the number of RIFs that can be created. When the test is limited by the auxiliary resource and not by the primary one, there's no point trying to run the overflow test, because it would be testing exhaustion of the wrong resource. To support this use case, when the $test_get_target yields 0, skip the test instead. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm(a)nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen(a)nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch(a)nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem(a)davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- .../selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/resource_scale.sh | 5 +++++ .../selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum/resource_scale.sh | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/resource_scale.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/resource_scale.sh index e9f65bd2e299..df920b6ed7c4 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/resource_scale.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/resource_scale.sh @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ for current_test in ${TESTS:-$ALL_TESTS}; do for should_fail in 0 1; do RET=0 target=$(${current_test}_get_target "$should_fail") + if ((target == 0)); then + log_test_skip "'$current_test' should_fail=$should_fail test" + continue + fi + ${current_test}_setup_prepare setup_wait $num_netifs ${current_test}_test "$target" "$should_fail" diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum/resource_scale.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum/resource_scale.sh index dea33dc93790..b75d1fcd2db2 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum/resource_scale.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum/resource_scale.sh @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ for current_test in ${TESTS:-$ALL_TESTS}; do for should_fail in 0 1; do RET=0 target=$(${current_test}_get_target "$should_fail") + if ((target == 0)); then + log_test_skip "'$current_test' [$profile] should_fail=$should_fail test" + continue + fi ${current_test}_setup_prepare setup_wait $num_netifs ${current_test}_test "$target" "$should_fail" -- 2.35.1

3 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.18 23/93] selftests/bpf: Avoid skipping certain subtests

by Sasha Levin

From: Yonghong Song <yhs(a)fb.com> [ Upstream commit 3831cd1f9ff627734096f22d8e37f72a5cabf92e ] Commit 704c91e59fe0 ('selftests/bpf: Test "bpftool gen min_core_btf"') added a test test_core_btfgen to test core relocation with btf generated with 'bpftool gen min_core_btf'. Currently, among 76 subtests, 25 are skipped. ... #46/69 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval:OK #46/70 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval___diff:OK #46/71 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval___val3_missing:OK #46/72 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval___err_missing:SKIP #46/73 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val:OK #46/74 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___diff:OK #46/75 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___val3_missing:OK #46/76 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___err_missing:SKIP ... #46 core_reloc_btfgen:SKIP Summary: 1/51 PASSED, 25 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Alexei found that in the above core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___err_missing should not be skipped. Currently, the core_reloc tests have some negative tests. In Commit 704c91e59fe0, for core_reloc_btfgen, all negative tests are skipped with the following condition if (!test_case->btf_src_file || test_case->fails) { test__skip(); continue; } This is too conservative. Negative tests do not fail mkstemp() and run_btfgen() should not be skipped. There are a few negative tests indeed failing run_btfgen() and this patch added 'run_btfgen_fails' to mark these tests so that they can be skipped for btfgen tests. With this, we have ... #46/69 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval:OK #46/70 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval___diff:OK #46/71 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval___val3_missing:OK #46/72 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval___err_missing:OK #46/73 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val:OK #46/74 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___diff:OK #46/75 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___val3_missing:OK #46/76 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___err_missing:OK ... Summary: 1/62 PASSED, 14 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Totally 14 subtests are skipped instead of 25. Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs(a)fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614055526.628299-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c index f28f75aa9154..70734bd10437 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ static int duration = 0; #define NESTING_ERR_CASE(name) { \ NESTING_CASE_COMMON(name), \ .fails = true, \ + .run_btfgen_fails = true, \ } #define ARRAYS_DATA(struct_name) STRUCT_TO_CHAR_PTR(struct_name) { \ @@ -258,12 +259,14 @@ static int duration = 0; BITFIELDS_CASE_COMMON("test_core_reloc_bitfields_probed.o", \ "probed:", name), \ .fails = true, \ + .run_btfgen_fails = true, \ .raw_tp_name = "sys_enter", \ .prog_name = "test_core_bitfields", \ }, { \ BITFIELDS_CASE_COMMON("test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct.o", \ "direct:", name), \ .fails = true, \ + .run_btfgen_fails = true, \ .prog_name = "test_core_bitfields_direct", \ } @@ -296,6 +299,7 @@ static int duration = 0; #define SIZE_ERR_CASE(name) { \ SIZE_CASE_COMMON(name), \ .fails = true, \ + .run_btfgen_fails = true, \ } #define TYPE_BASED_CASE_COMMON(name) \ @@ -369,6 +373,7 @@ struct core_reloc_test_case { const char *output; int output_len; bool fails; + bool run_btfgen_fails; bool needs_testmod; bool relaxed_core_relocs; const char *prog_name; @@ -885,7 +890,7 @@ static void run_core_reloc_tests(bool use_btfgen) /* generate a "minimal" BTF file and use it as source */ if (use_btfgen) { - if (!test_case->btf_src_file || test_case->fails) { + if (!test_case->btf_src_file || test_case->run_btfgen_fails) { test__skip(); continue; } -- 2.35.1

3 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.19 090/105] bpf/selftests: Fix couldn't retrieve pinned program in xdp veth test

by Sasha Levin

From: Jie2x Zhou <jie2x.zhou(a)intel.com> [ Upstream commit f664f9c6b4a1bb9a10af812df0fbbf6aac28fcc6 ] Before change: selftests: bpf: test_xdp_veth.sh Couldn't retrieve pinned program '/sys/fs/bpf/test_xdp_veth/progs/redirect_map_0': No such file or directory selftests: xdp_veth [SKIP] ok 20 selftests: bpf: test_xdp_veth.sh # SKIP After change: PING 10.1.1.33 (10.1.1.33) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.1.1.33: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.320 ms --- 10.1.1.33 ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.320/0.320/0.320/0.000 ms selftests: xdp_veth [PASS] For the test case, the following can be found: ls /sys/fs/bpf/test_xdp_veth/progs/redirect_map_0 ls: cannot access '/sys/fs/bpf/test_xdp_veth/progs/redirect_map_0': No such file or directory ls /sys/fs/bpf/test_xdp_veth/progs/ xdp_redirect_map_0 xdp_redirect_map_1 xdp_redirect_map_2 Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jie2x Zhou <jie2x.zhou(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel(a)iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220719082430.9916-1-jie2x.zhou@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xdp_veth.sh | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xdp_veth.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xdp_veth.sh index 392d28cc4e58..49936c4c8567 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xdp_veth.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xdp_veth.sh @@ -106,9 +106,9 @@ bpftool prog loadall \ bpftool map update pinned $BPF_DIR/maps/tx_port key 0 0 0 0 value 122 0 0 0 bpftool map update pinned $BPF_DIR/maps/tx_port key 1 0 0 0 value 133 0 0 0 bpftool map update pinned $BPF_DIR/maps/tx_port key 2 0 0 0 value 111 0 0 0 -ip link set dev veth1 xdp pinned $BPF_DIR/progs/redirect_map_0 -ip link set dev veth2 xdp pinned $BPF_DIR/progs/redirect_map_1 -ip link set dev veth3 xdp pinned $BPF_DIR/progs/redirect_map_2 +ip link set dev veth1 xdp pinned $BPF_DIR/progs/xdp_redirect_map_0 +ip link set dev veth2 xdp pinned $BPF_DIR/progs/xdp_redirect_map_1 +ip link set dev veth3 xdp pinned $BPF_DIR/progs/xdp_redirect_map_2 ip -n ${NS1} link set dev veth11 xdp obj xdp_dummy.o sec xdp ip -n ${NS2} link set dev veth22 xdp obj xdp_tx.o sec xdp -- 2.35.1

3 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.19 071/105] selftests/bpf: Do not attach kprobe_multi bench to bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func

by Sasha Levin

From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa(a)kernel.org> [ Upstream commit 7fb27a56b9ebd8a77d9dd188e8a42bff99bc3443 ] Alexei reported crash by running test_progs -j on system with 32 cpus. It turned out the kprobe_multi bench test that attaches all ftrace-able functions will race with bpf_dispatcher_update, that calls bpf_arch_text_poke on bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func, which is ftrace-able function. Ftrace is not aware of this update so this will cause ftrace_bug with: WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 1985 at arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c:94 ftrace_verify_code+0x27/0x50 ... ftrace_replace_code+0xa3/0x170 ftrace_modify_all_code+0xbd/0x150 ftrace_startup_enable+0x3f/0x50 ftrace_startup+0x98/0xf0 register_ftrace_function+0x20/0x60 register_fprobe_ips+0xbb/0xd0 bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach+0x179/0x430 __sys_bpf+0x18a1/0x2440 ... ------------[ ftrace bug ]------------ ftrace failed to modify [<ffffffff818d9380>] bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func+0x0/0x10 actual: ffffffe9:7b:ffffff9c:77:1e Setting ftrace call site to call ftrace function It looks like we need some way to hide some functions from ftrace, but meanwhile we workaround this by skipping bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func from kprobe_multi bench test. Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii(a)kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs(a)fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220714082316.479181-1-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c index 5b93d5d0bd93..48681bf73e0b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c @@ -364,6 +364,8 @@ static int get_syms(char ***symsp, size_t *cntp) continue; if (!strncmp(name, "rcu_", 4)) continue; + if (!strcmp(name, "bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func")) + continue; if (!strncmp(name, "__ftrace_invalid_address__", sizeof("__ftrace_invalid_address__") - 1)) continue; -- 2.35.1

3 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.19 050/105] kselftests: Enable the echo command to print newlines in Makefile

by Sasha Levin

From: Gautam <gautammenghani201(a)gmail.com> [ Upstream commit 3297a4df805d4263506b6dfec4d1bbeff8862dd8 ] In the install section of the main Makefile of kselftests, the echo command is used with -n flag, which disables the printing of new line due to which the output contains "\n" chars as follows: Emit Tests for alsa\nSkipping non-existent dir: arm64 Emit Tests for breakpoints\nEmit Tests for capabilities\n This patch fixes the above bug by using the -e flag. Signed-off-by: Gautam <gautammenghani201(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile index de11992dc577..52e31437f1a3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ ifdef INSTALL_PATH for TARGET in $(TARGETS); do \ BUILD_TARGET=$$BUILD/$$TARGET; \ [ ! -d $(INSTALL_PATH)/$$TARGET ] && echo "Skipping non-existent dir: $$TARGET" && continue; \ - echo -n "Emit Tests for $$TARGET\n"; \ + echo -ne "Emit Tests for $$TARGET\n"; \ $(MAKE) -s --no-print-directory OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET COLLECTION=$$TARGET \ -C $$TARGET emit_tests >> $(TEST_LIST); \ done; -- 2.35.1

3 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.19 027/105] selftests: mlxsw: resource_scale: Allow skipping a test

by Sasha Levin

From: Petr Machata <petrm(a)nvidia.com> [ Upstream commit 8cad339db339a39cb82b1188e4be4070a433abac ] The scale tests are currently testing two things: that some number of instances of a given resource can actually be created; and that when an attempt is made to create more than the supported amount, the failures are noted and handled gracefully. Sometimes the scale test depends on more than one resource. In particular, a following patch will add a RIF counter scale test, which depends on the number of RIF counters that can be bound, and also on the number of RIFs that can be created. When the test is limited by the auxiliary resource and not by the primary one, there's no point trying to run the overflow test, because it would be testing exhaustion of the wrong resource. To support this use case, when the $test_get_target yields 0, skip the test instead. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm(a)nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen(a)nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch(a)nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem(a)davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- .../selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/resource_scale.sh | 5 +++++ .../selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum/resource_scale.sh | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/resource_scale.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/resource_scale.sh index e9f65bd2e299..df920b6ed7c4 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/resource_scale.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum-2/resource_scale.sh @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ for current_test in ${TESTS:-$ALL_TESTS}; do for should_fail in 0 1; do RET=0 target=$(${current_test}_get_target "$should_fail") + if ((target == 0)); then + log_test_skip "'$current_test' should_fail=$should_fail test" + continue + fi + ${current_test}_setup_prepare setup_wait $num_netifs ${current_test}_test "$target" "$should_fail" diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum/resource_scale.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum/resource_scale.sh index dea33dc93790..b75d1fcd2db2 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum/resource_scale.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/spectrum/resource_scale.sh @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ for current_test in ${TESTS:-$ALL_TESTS}; do for should_fail in 0 1; do RET=0 target=$(${current_test}_get_target "$should_fail") + if ((target == 0)); then + log_test_skip "'$current_test' [$profile] should_fail=$should_fail test" + continue + fi ${current_test}_setup_prepare setup_wait $num_netifs ${current_test}_test "$target" "$should_fail" -- 2.35.1

3 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.19 024/105] selftests/bpf: Avoid skipping certain subtests

by Sasha Levin

From: Yonghong Song <yhs(a)fb.com> [ Upstream commit 3831cd1f9ff627734096f22d8e37f72a5cabf92e ] Commit 704c91e59fe0 ('selftests/bpf: Test "bpftool gen min_core_btf"') added a test test_core_btfgen to test core relocation with btf generated with 'bpftool gen min_core_btf'. Currently, among 76 subtests, 25 are skipped. ... #46/69 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval:OK #46/70 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval___diff:OK #46/71 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval___val3_missing:OK #46/72 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval___err_missing:SKIP #46/73 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val:OK #46/74 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___diff:OK #46/75 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___val3_missing:OK #46/76 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___err_missing:SKIP ... #46 core_reloc_btfgen:SKIP Summary: 1/51 PASSED, 25 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Alexei found that in the above core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___err_missing should not be skipped. Currently, the core_reloc tests have some negative tests. In Commit 704c91e59fe0, for core_reloc_btfgen, all negative tests are skipped with the following condition if (!test_case->btf_src_file || test_case->fails) { test__skip(); continue; } This is too conservative. Negative tests do not fail mkstemp() and run_btfgen() should not be skipped. There are a few negative tests indeed failing run_btfgen() and this patch added 'run_btfgen_fails' to mark these tests so that they can be skipped for btfgen tests. With this, we have ... #46/69 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval:OK #46/70 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval___diff:OK #46/71 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval___val3_missing:OK #46/72 core_reloc_btfgen/enumval___err_missing:OK #46/73 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val:OK #46/74 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___diff:OK #46/75 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___val3_missing:OK #46/76 core_reloc_btfgen/enum64val___err_missing:OK ... Summary: 1/62 PASSED, 14 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Totally 14 subtests are skipped instead of 25. Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs(a)fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614055526.628299-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c index 3712dfe1be59..ed85abd6782c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ static int duration = 0; #define NESTING_ERR_CASE(name) { \ NESTING_CASE_COMMON(name), \ .fails = true, \ + .run_btfgen_fails = true, \ } #define ARRAYS_DATA(struct_name) STRUCT_TO_CHAR_PTR(struct_name) { \ @@ -258,12 +259,14 @@ static int duration = 0; BITFIELDS_CASE_COMMON("test_core_reloc_bitfields_probed.o", \ "probed:", name), \ .fails = true, \ + .run_btfgen_fails = true, \ .raw_tp_name = "sys_enter", \ .prog_name = "test_core_bitfields", \ }, { \ BITFIELDS_CASE_COMMON("test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct.o", \ "direct:", name), \ .fails = true, \ + .run_btfgen_fails = true, \ .prog_name = "test_core_bitfields_direct", \ } @@ -304,6 +307,7 @@ static int duration = 0; #define SIZE_ERR_CASE(name) { \ SIZE_CASE_COMMON(name), \ .fails = true, \ + .run_btfgen_fails = true, \ } #define TYPE_BASED_CASE_COMMON(name) \ @@ -377,6 +381,7 @@ struct core_reloc_test_case { const char *output; int output_len; bool fails; + bool run_btfgen_fails; bool needs_testmod; bool relaxed_core_relocs; const char *prog_name; @@ -894,7 +899,7 @@ static void run_core_reloc_tests(bool use_btfgen) /* generate a "minimal" BTF file and use it as source */ if (use_btfgen) { - if (!test_case->btf_src_file || test_case->fails) { + if (!test_case->btf_src_file || test_case->run_btfgen_fails) { test__skip(); continue; } -- 2.35.1

3 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

[PATCH] Solve Kselftest patch task

by Anup K Parikh

Most messages were perfect and so this is a minor pretty print change Signed-off-by: Anup K Parikh <parikhanupk.foss(a)gmail.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/cpufreq/cpu.sh | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cpufreq/cpu.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/cpufreq/cpu.sh index 39fdcdfb8..fac318e8f 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cpufreq/cpu.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cpufreq/cpu.sh @@ -49,11 +49,22 @@ reboot_cpu() online_cpu $1 } +#$1: number +prettyprint_number_times() +{ + if [ "x$1" = "x1" ]; then + echo "once" + else + echo "$1 times" + fi +} + # Reboot CPUs # param: number of times we want to run the loop reboot_cpus() { - printf "** Test: Running ${FUNCNAME[0]} for $1 loops **\n\n" + local ptimes=`prettyprint_number_times $1` + printf "** Test: Running ${FUNCNAME[0]} $ptimes **\n\n" for i in `seq 1 $1`; do for_each_non_boot_cpu offline_cpu -- 2.35.1

3 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

lkft kselftest for next-20220811

by lkft＠linaro.org

## Build * kernel: 5.19.0 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/next/linux-next * git branch: master * git commit: 40d43a7507e1547dd45cb02af2e40d897c591870 * git describe: next-20220811 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20220811 ## Test Regressions (compared to next-20220810) No test regressions found. ## Metric Regressions (compared to next-20220810) No metric regressions found. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft(a)linaro.org> ## Test Fixes (compared to next-20220810) No test fixes found. ## Metric Fixes (compared to next-20220810) No metric fixes found. ## Test result summary total: 0, pass: 0, fail: 0, skip: 0, xfail: 0 ## Build Summary ## Test suites summary -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org

3 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror