- Linux-kselftest-mirror - lists.linaro.org

[PATCH v2 3/5] selftests: memcg: Adjust expected reclaim values of protected cgroups

by Michal Koutný

The numbers are not easy to derive in a closed form (certainly mere protections ratios do not apply), therefore use a simulation to obtain expected numbers. Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny(a)suse.com> --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + .../selftests/cgroup/memcg_protection.m | 89 +++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 29 +++--- 3 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/memcg_protection.m diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 78c57046fa93..b28b6aeb8636 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -5029,6 +5029,7 @@ L: linux-mm(a)kvack.org S: Maintained F: mm/memcontrol.c F: mm/swap_cgroup.c +F: tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/memcg_protection.m F: tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_kmem.c F: tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/memcg_protection.m b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/memcg_protection.m new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..051daa3477b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/memcg_protection.m @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ +% SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +% +% run as: octave-cli memcg_protection.m +% +% This script simulates reclaim protection behavior on a single level of memcg +% hierarchy to illustrate how overcommitted protection spreads among siblings +% (as it depends also on their current consumption). +% +% Simulation assumes siblings consumed the initial amount of memory (w/out +% reclaim) and then the reclaim starts, all memory is reclaimable, i.e. treated +% same. It simulates only non-low reclaim and assumes all memory.min = 0. +% +% Input configurations +% -------------------- +% E number parent effective protection +% n vector nominal protection of siblings set at the given level (memory.low) +% c vector current consumption -,,- (memory.current) + +% example from testcase (values in GB) +E = 50 / 1024; +n = [75 25 0 500 ] / 1024; +c = [50 50 50 0] / 1024; + +% Reclaim parameters +% ------------------ + +% Minimal reclaim amount (GB) +cluster = 32*4 / 2**20; + +% Reclaim coefficient (think as 0.5^sc->priority) +alpha = .1 + +% Simulation parameters +% --------------------- +epsilon = 1e-7; +timeout = 1000; + +% Simulation loop +% --------------- + +ch = []; +eh = []; +rh = []; + +for t = 1:timeout + % low_usage + u = min(c, n); + siblings = sum(u); + + % effective_protection() + protected = min(n, c); % start with nominal + e = protected * min(1, E / siblings); % normalize overcommit + + % recursive protection + unclaimed = max(0, E - siblings); + parent_overuse = sum(c) - siblings; + if (unclaimed > 0 && parent_overuse > 0) + overuse = max(0, c - protected); + e += unclaimed * (overuse / parent_overuse); + endif + + % get_scan_count() + r = alpha * c; % assume all memory is in a single LRU list + + % commit 1bc63fb1272b ("mm, memcg: make scan aggression always exclude protection") + sz = max(e, c); + r .*= (1 - (e+epsilon) ./ (sz+epsilon)); + + % uncomment to debug prints + % e, c, r + + % nothing to reclaim, reached equilibrium + if max(r) < epsilon + break; + endif + + % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX roundup + r = max(r, (r > epsilon) .* cluster); + % XXX here I do parallel reclaim of all siblings + % in reality reclaim is serialized and each sibling recalculates own residual + c = max(c - r, 0); + + ch = [ch ; c]; + eh = [eh ; e]; + rh = [rh ; r]; +endfor + +t +c, e diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c index 4924425639b0..dc2c7d6e3572 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static int cg_test_proc_killed(const char *cgroup) /* * First, this test creates the following hierarchy: * A memory.min = 50M, memory.max = 200M - * A/B memory.min = 50M, memory.current = 50M + * A/B memory.min = 50M * A/B/C memory.min = 75M, memory.current = 50M * A/B/D memory.min = 25M, memory.current = 50M * A/B/E memory.min = 0, memory.current = 50M @@ -259,10 +259,13 @@ static int cg_test_proc_killed(const char *cgroup) * Then it creates A/G and creates a significant * memory pressure in it. * + * Then it checks actual memory usages and expects that: * A/B memory.current ~= 50M - * A/B/C memory.current ~= 33M - * A/B/D memory.current ~= 17M - * A/B/F memory.current ~= 0 + * A/B/C memory.current ~= 29M + * A/B/D memory.current ~= 21M + * A/B/E memory.current ~= 0 + * A/B/F memory.current = 0 + * (for origin of the numbers, see model in memcg_protection.m.) * * After that it tries to allocate more than there is * unprotected memory in A available, and checks @@ -365,10 +368,10 @@ static int test_memcg_min(const char *root) for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(children); i++) c[i] = cg_read_long(children[i], "memory.current"); - if (!values_close(c[0], MB(33), 10)) + if (!values_close(c[0], MB(29), 10)) goto cleanup; - if (!values_close(c[1], MB(17), 10)) + if (!values_close(c[1], MB(21), 10)) goto cleanup; if (c[3] != 0) @@ -405,7 +408,7 @@ static int test_memcg_min(const char *root) /* * First, this test creates the following hierarchy: * A memory.low = 50M, memory.max = 200M - * A/B memory.low = 50M, memory.current = 50M + * A/B memory.low = 50M * A/B/C memory.low = 75M, memory.current = 50M * A/B/D memory.low = 25M, memory.current = 50M * A/B/E memory.low = 0, memory.current = 50M @@ -417,9 +420,11 @@ static int test_memcg_min(const char *root) * * Then it checks actual memory usages and expects that: * A/B memory.current ~= 50M - * A/B/ memory.current ~= 33M - * A/B/D memory.current ~= 17M - * A/B/F memory.current ~= 0 + * A/B/C memory.current ~= 29M + * A/B/D memory.current ~= 21M + * A/B/E memory.current ~= 0 + * A/B/F memory.current = 0 + * (for origin of the numbers, see model in memcg_protection.m.) * * After that it tries to allocate more than there is * unprotected memory in A available, @@ -512,10 +517,10 @@ static int test_memcg_low(const char *root) for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(children); i++) c[i] = cg_read_long(children[i], "memory.current"); - if (!values_close(c[0], MB(33), 10)) + if (!values_close(c[0], MB(29), 10)) goto cleanup; - if (!values_close(c[1], MB(17), 10)) + if (!values_close(c[1], MB(21), 10)) goto cleanup; if (c[3] != 0) -- 2.35.3

2 years, 8 months

2
1
0 0

[PATCH 0/4] memcontrol selftests fixups

by Michal Koutný

Hello. I'm just flushing the simple patches to make memcontrol selftests check the events behavior we had consensus about (test_memcg_low fails). (I've dropped to goto macros for now.) (test_memcg_reclaim, test_memcg_swap_max fail for me now but it's present even before the refactoring.) The only bigger change is adjustment of the protected values to make tests succeed with the given tolerance. It's based on mm-stable [1] commit e240ac52f7da. AFAIC, the fixup and partial reverts may be folded into respective commits. Let me know if it should be (re)based on something else. Thanks, Michal [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git/log/tools/testi… Michal Koutný (4): selftests: memcg: Fix compilation selftests: memcg: Expect no low events in unprotected sibling selftests: memcg: Adjust expected reclaim values of protected cgroups selftests: memcg: Remove protection from top level memcg .../selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 59 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) -- 2.35.3

2 years, 8 months

1
5
0 0

[PATCH v2 5/5] selftests: memcg: Factor out common parts of memory.{low,min} tests

by Michal Koutný

The memory protection test setup and runtime is almost equal for memory.low and memory.min cases. It makes modification of the common parts prone to mistakes, since the protections are similar not only in setup but also in principle, factor the common part out. Past exceptions between the tests: - missing memory.min is fine (kept), - test_memcg_low protected orphaned pagecache (adapted like test_memcg_min and we keep the processes of protected memory running). The evaluation in two tests is different (OOM of allocator vs low events of protégés), this is kept different. Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny(a)suse.com> --- .../selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 199 ++++-------------- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 163 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c index 63c6a683a8c1..c3d0d5f7b19c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c @@ -190,13 +190,6 @@ static int test_memcg_current(const char *root) return ret; } -static int alloc_pagecache_50M(const char *cgroup, void *arg) -{ - int fd = (long)arg; - - return alloc_pagecache(fd, MB(50)); -} - static int alloc_pagecache_50M_noexit(const char *cgroup, void *arg) { int fd = (long)arg; @@ -254,7 +247,9 @@ static int cg_test_proc_killed(const char *cgroup) * A/B/E memory.min = 0, memory.current = 50M * A/B/F memory.min = 500M, memory.current = 0 * - * Usages are pagecache, but the test keeps a running + * (or memory.low if we test soft protection) + * + * Usages are pagecache and the test keeps a running * process in every leaf cgroup. * Then it creates A/G and creates a significant * memory pressure in A. @@ -268,15 +263,16 @@ static int cg_test_proc_killed(const char *cgroup) * (for origin of the numbers, see model in memcg_protection.m.) * * After that it tries to allocate more than there is - * unprotected memory in A available, and checks - * checks that memory.min protects pagecache even - * in this case. + * unprotected memory in A available, and checks that: + * a) memory.min protects pagecache even in this case, + * b) memory.low allows reclaiming page cache with low events. */ -static int test_memcg_min(const char *root) +static int test_memcg_protection(const char *root, bool min) { - int ret = KSFT_FAIL; + int ret = KSFT_FAIL, rc; char *parent[3] = {NULL}; char *children[4] = {NULL}; + const char *attribute = min ? "memory.min" : "memory.low"; long c[4]; int i, attempts; int fd; @@ -300,8 +296,10 @@ static int test_memcg_min(const char *root) if (cg_create(parent[0])) goto cleanup; - if (cg_read_long(parent[0], "memory.min")) { - ret = KSFT_SKIP; + if (cg_read_long(parent[0], attribute)) { + /* No memory.min on older kernels is fine */ + if (min) + ret = KSFT_SKIP; goto cleanup; } @@ -338,15 +336,15 @@ static int test_memcg_min(const char *root) (void *)(long)fd); } - if (cg_write(parent[1], "memory.min", "50M")) + if (cg_write(parent[1], attribute, "50M")) goto cleanup; - if (cg_write(children[0], "memory.min", "75M")) + if (cg_write(children[0], attribute, "75M")) goto cleanup; - if (cg_write(children[1], "memory.min", "25M")) + if (cg_write(children[1], attribute, "25M")) goto cleanup; - if (cg_write(children[2], "memory.min", "0")) + if (cg_write(children[2], attribute, "0")) goto cleanup; - if (cg_write(children[3], "memory.min", "500M")) + if (cg_write(children[3], attribute, "500M")) goto cleanup; attempts = 0; @@ -375,161 +373,26 @@ static int test_memcg_min(const char *root) if (c[3] != 0) goto cleanup; - if (!cg_run(parent[2], alloc_anon, (void *)MB(170))) - goto cleanup; - - if (!values_close(cg_read_long(parent[1], "memory.current"), MB(50), 3)) - goto cleanup; - - ret = KSFT_PASS; - -cleanup: - for (i = ARRAY_SIZE(children) - 1; i >= 0; i--) { - if (!children[i]) - continue; - - cg_destroy(children[i]); - free(children[i]); - } - - for (i = ARRAY_SIZE(parent) - 1; i >= 0; i--) { - if (!parent[i]) - continue; - - cg_destroy(parent[i]); - free(parent[i]); - } - close(fd); - return ret; -} - -/* - * First, this test creates the following hierarchy: - * A memory.low = 0, memory.max = 200M - * A/B memory.low = 50M - * A/B/C memory.low = 75M, memory.current = 50M - * A/B/D memory.low = 25M, memory.current = 50M - * A/B/E memory.low = 0, memory.current = 50M - * A/B/F memory.low = 500M, memory.current = 0 - * - * Usages are pagecache. - * Then it creates A/G an creates a significant - * memory pressure in it. - * - * Then it checks actual memory usages and expects that: - * A/B memory.current ~= 50M - * A/B/C memory.current ~= 29M - * A/B/D memory.current ~= 21M - * A/B/E memory.current ~= 0 - * A/B/F memory.current = 0 - * (for origin of the numbers, see model in memcg_protection.m.) - * - * After that it tries to allocate more than there is - * unprotected memory in A available, - * and checks low and oom events in memory.events. - */ -static int test_memcg_low(const char *root) -{ - int ret = KSFT_FAIL; - char *parent[3] = {NULL}; - char *children[4] = {NULL}; - long low, oom; - long c[4]; - int i; - int fd; - - fd = get_temp_fd(); - if (fd < 0) - goto cleanup; - - parent[0] = cg_name(root, "memcg_test_0"); - if (!parent[0]) - goto cleanup; - - parent[1] = cg_name(parent[0], "memcg_test_1"); - if (!parent[1]) - goto cleanup; - - parent[2] = cg_name(parent[0], "memcg_test_2"); - if (!parent[2]) - goto cleanup; - - if (cg_create(parent[0])) - goto cleanup; - - if (cg_read_long(parent[0], "memory.low")) - goto cleanup; - - if (cg_write(parent[0], "cgroup.subtree_control", "+memory")) + rc = cg_run(parent[2], alloc_anon, (void *)MB(170)); + if (min && !rc) goto cleanup; - - if (cg_write(parent[0], "memory.max", "200M")) - goto cleanup; - - if (cg_write(parent[0], "memory.swap.max", "0")) - goto cleanup; - - if (cg_create(parent[1])) - goto cleanup; - - if (cg_write(parent[1], "cgroup.subtree_control", "+memory")) - goto cleanup; - - if (cg_create(parent[2])) + else if (!min && rc) { + fprintf(stderr, + "memory.low prevents from allocating anon memory\n"); goto cleanup; - - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(children); i++) { - children[i] = cg_name_indexed(parent[1], "child_memcg", i); - if (!children[i]) - goto cleanup; - - if (cg_create(children[i])) - goto cleanup; - - if (i > 2) - continue; - - if (cg_run(children[i], alloc_pagecache_50M, (void *)(long)fd)) - goto cleanup; } - if (cg_write(parent[1], "memory.low", "50M")) - goto cleanup; - if (cg_write(children[0], "memory.low", "75M")) - goto cleanup; - if (cg_write(children[1], "memory.low", "25M")) - goto cleanup; - if (cg_write(children[2], "memory.low", "0")) - goto cleanup; - if (cg_write(children[3], "memory.low", "500M")) - goto cleanup; - - if (cg_run(parent[2], alloc_anon, (void *)MB(148))) - goto cleanup; - if (!values_close(cg_read_long(parent[1], "memory.current"), MB(50), 3)) goto cleanup; - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(children); i++) - c[i] = cg_read_long(children[i], "memory.current"); - - if (!values_close(c[0], MB(29), 10)) - goto cleanup; - - if (!values_close(c[1], MB(21), 10)) - goto cleanup; - - if (c[3] != 0) - goto cleanup; - - if (cg_run(parent[2], alloc_anon, (void *)MB(166))) { - fprintf(stderr, - "memory.low prevents from allocating anon memory\n"); + if (min) { + ret = KSFT_PASS; goto cleanup; } for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(children); i++) { int no_low_events_index = 1; + long low, oom; oom = cg_read_key_long(children[i], "memory.events", "oom "); low = cg_read_key_long(children[i], "memory.events", "low "); @@ -565,6 +428,16 @@ static int test_memcg_low(const char *root) return ret; } +static int test_memcg_min(const char *root) +{ + return test_memcg_protection(root, true); +} + +static int test_memcg_low(const char *root) +{ + return test_memcg_protection(root, false); +} + static int alloc_pagecache_max_30M(const char *cgroup, void *arg) { size_t size = MB(50); -- 2.35.3

2 years, 8 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v2 2/5] selftests: memcg: Expect no low events in unprotected sibling

by Michal Koutný

This is effectively a revert of commit cdc69458a5f3 ("cgroup: account for memory_recursiveprot in test_memcg_low()"). The case test_memcg_low will fail with memory_recursiveprot until resolved in reclaim code. However, this patch preserves the existing helpers and variables for later uses. Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Vernet <void(a)manifault.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c index c012db9d07d6..4924425639b0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ static int test_memcg_low(const char *root) } for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(children); i++) { - int no_low_events_index = has_recursiveprot ? 2 : 1; + int no_low_events_index = 1; oom = cg_read_key_long(children[i], "memory.events", "oom "); low = cg_read_key_long(children[i], "memory.events", "low "); -- 2.35.3

2 years, 8 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH] selftests/sgx: add test_encl.elf to TEST_GEN_FILES

by Jarkko Sakkinen

TEST_GEN_FILES contains files that are generated during compilation and are required to be included together with the test binaries, e.g. when performing: make -C tools/testing/selftests install INSTALL_PATH=/some/other/path [*] Add test_encl.elf to TEST_GEN_FILES because otherwise the installed test binary will fail to run. [*] https://docs.kernel.org/dev-tools/kselftest.html Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Fixes: 2adcba79e69d ("selftests/x86: Add a selftest for SGX") Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/sgx/Makefile | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/Makefile index 75af864e07b6..f3f312904bcc 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/Makefile @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ ENCL_CFLAGS := -Wall -Werror -static -nostdlib -nostartfiles -fPIC \ -fno-stack-protector -mrdrnd $(INCLUDES) TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS := $(OUTPUT)/test_sgx +TEST_GEN_FILES := $(OUTPUT)/test_encl.elf ifeq ($(CAN_BUILD_X86_64), 1) all: $(TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS) $(OUTPUT)/test_encl.elf -- 2.36.1

2 years, 8 months

1
1
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 3/6] selftests: add ping test with ping_group_range tuned

by Sasha Levin

From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel(a)6wind.com> [ Upstream commit e71b7f1f44d3d88c677769c85ef0171caf9fc89f ] The 'ping' utility is able to manage two kind of sockets (raw or icmp), depending on the sysctl ping_group_range. By default, ping_group_range is set to '1 0', which forces ping to use an ip raw socket. Let's replay the ping tests by allowing 'ping' to use the ip icmp socket. After the previous patch, ipv4 tests results are the same with both kinds of socket. For ipv6, there are a lot a new failures (the previous patch fixes only two cases). Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel(a)6wind.com> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh index 157822331954..d2ac09b35dcf 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh @@ -757,10 +757,16 @@ ipv4_ping() setup set_sysctl net.ipv4.raw_l3mdev_accept=1 2>/dev/null ipv4_ping_novrf + setup + set_sysctl net.ipv4.ping_group_range='0 2147483647' 2>/dev/null + ipv4_ping_novrf log_subsection "With VRF" setup "yes" ipv4_ping_vrf + setup "yes" + set_sysctl net.ipv4.ping_group_range='0 2147483647' 2>/dev/null + ipv4_ping_vrf } ################################################################################ @@ -2005,10 +2011,16 @@ ipv6_ping() log_subsection "No VRF" setup ipv6_ping_novrf + setup + set_sysctl net.ipv4.ping_group_range='0 2147483647' 2>/dev/null + ipv6_ping_novrf log_subsection "With VRF" setup "yes" ipv6_ping_vrf + setup "yes" + set_sysctl net.ipv4.ping_group_range='0 2147483647' 2>/dev/null + ipv6_ping_vrf } ################################################################################ -- 2.35.1

2 years, 8 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 04/13] selftests: add ping test with ping_group_range tuned

by Sasha Levin

From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel(a)6wind.com> [ Upstream commit e71b7f1f44d3d88c677769c85ef0171caf9fc89f ] The 'ping' utility is able to manage two kind of sockets (raw or icmp), depending on the sysctl ping_group_range. By default, ping_group_range is set to '1 0', which forces ping to use an ip raw socket. Let's replay the ping tests by allowing 'ping' to use the ip icmp socket. After the previous patch, ipv4 tests results are the same with both kinds of socket. For ipv6, there are a lot a new failures (the previous patch fixes only two cases). Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel(a)6wind.com> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh index ace976d89125..4a11ea2261cb 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh @@ -794,10 +794,16 @@ ipv4_ping() setup set_sysctl net.ipv4.raw_l3mdev_accept=1 2>/dev/null ipv4_ping_novrf + setup + set_sysctl net.ipv4.ping_group_range='0 2147483647' 2>/dev/null + ipv4_ping_novrf log_subsection "With VRF" setup "yes" ipv4_ping_vrf + setup "yes" + set_sysctl net.ipv4.ping_group_range='0 2147483647' 2>/dev/null + ipv4_ping_vrf } ################################################################################ @@ -2261,10 +2267,16 @@ ipv6_ping() log_subsection "No VRF" setup ipv6_ping_novrf + setup + set_sysctl net.ipv4.ping_group_range='0 2147483647' 2>/dev/null + ipv6_ping_novrf log_subsection "With VRF" setup "yes" ipv6_ping_vrf + setup "yes" + set_sysctl net.ipv4.ping_group_range='0 2147483647' 2>/dev/null + ipv6_ping_vrf } ################################################################################ -- 2.35.1

2 years, 8 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 05/17] selftests: add ping test with ping_group_range tuned

by Sasha Levin

From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel(a)6wind.com> [ Upstream commit e71b7f1f44d3d88c677769c85ef0171caf9fc89f ] The 'ping' utility is able to manage two kind of sockets (raw or icmp), depending on the sysctl ping_group_range. By default, ping_group_range is set to '1 0', which forces ping to use an ip raw socket. Let's replay the ping tests by allowing 'ping' to use the ip icmp socket. After the previous patch, ipv4 tests results are the same with both kinds of socket. For ipv6, there are a lot a new failures (the previous patch fixes only two cases). Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel(a)6wind.com> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh index aec9e784d0b4..91f54112167f 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh @@ -803,10 +803,16 @@ ipv4_ping() setup set_sysctl net.ipv4.raw_l3mdev_accept=1 2>/dev/null ipv4_ping_novrf + setup + set_sysctl net.ipv4.ping_group_range='0 2147483647' 2>/dev/null + ipv4_ping_novrf log_subsection "With VRF" setup "yes" ipv4_ping_vrf + setup "yes" + set_sysctl net.ipv4.ping_group_range='0 2147483647' 2>/dev/null + ipv4_ping_vrf } ################################################################################ @@ -2324,10 +2330,16 @@ ipv6_ping() log_subsection "No VRF" setup ipv6_ping_novrf + setup + set_sysctl net.ipv4.ping_group_range='0 2147483647' 2>/dev/null + ipv6_ping_novrf log_subsection "With VRF" setup "yes" ipv6_ping_vrf + setup "yes" + set_sysctl net.ipv4.ping_group_range='0 2147483647' 2>/dev/null + ipv6_ping_vrf } ################################################################################ -- 2.35.1

2 years, 8 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.17 06/23] selftests: add ping test with ping_group_range tuned

by Sasha Levin

From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel(a)6wind.com> [ Upstream commit e71b7f1f44d3d88c677769c85ef0171caf9fc89f ] The 'ping' utility is able to manage two kind of sockets (raw or icmp), depending on the sysctl ping_group_range. By default, ping_group_range is set to '1 0', which forces ping to use an ip raw socket. Let's replay the ping tests by allowing 'ping' to use the ip icmp socket. After the previous patch, ipv4 tests results are the same with both kinds of socket. For ipv6, there are a lot a new failures (the previous patch fixes only two cases). Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel(a)6wind.com> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh index 3f4c8cfe7aca..7cd9b31d0307 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh @@ -810,10 +810,16 @@ ipv4_ping() setup set_sysctl net.ipv4.raw_l3mdev_accept=1 2>/dev/null ipv4_ping_novrf + setup + set_sysctl net.ipv4.ping_group_range='0 2147483647' 2>/dev/null + ipv4_ping_novrf log_subsection "With VRF" setup "yes" ipv4_ping_vrf + setup "yes" + set_sysctl net.ipv4.ping_group_range='0 2147483647' 2>/dev/null + ipv4_ping_vrf } ################################################################################ @@ -2348,10 +2354,16 @@ ipv6_ping() log_subsection "No VRF" setup ipv6_ping_novrf + setup + set_sysctl net.ipv4.ping_group_range='0 2147483647' 2>/dev/null + ipv6_ping_novrf log_subsection "With VRF" setup "yes" ipv6_ping_vrf + setup "yes" + set_sysctl net.ipv4.ping_group_range='0 2147483647' 2>/dev/null + ipv6_ping_vrf } ################################################################################ -- 2.35.1

2 years, 8 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH] selftests/lkdtm: add config

by Muhammad Usama Anjum

Add config options which are needed for LKDTM sub-tests. STACKLEAK_ERASING test needs GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK config. READ_AFTER_FREE and READ_BUDDY_AFTER_FREE tests need INIT_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON config. Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/config | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/config b/tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/config index 3041236887394..5d52f64dfb430 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/config +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/config @@ -2,8 +2,10 @@ CONFIG_LKDTM=y CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST=y CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED=y CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y +CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK=y CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY=y CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET_DEFAULT=y +CONFIG_INIT_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON=y CONFIG_INIT_ON_ALLOC_DEFAULT_ON=y CONFIG_UBSAN=y CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS=y -- 2.30.2

2 years, 8 months

2
1
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror