- Linux-kselftest-mirror - lists.linaro.org

[PATCH v2] riscv: selftests: Fix warnings pointer masking test

by Charlie Jenkins

When compiling the pointer masking tests with -Wall this warning is present: pointer_masking.c: In function ‘test_tagged_addr_abi_sysctl’: pointer_masking.c:203:9: warning: ignoring return value of ‘pwrite’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result] 203 | pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ pointer_masking.c:208:9: warning: ignoring return value of ‘pwrite’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result] 208 | pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); I came across this on riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04). Fix this by checking that the number of bytes written equal the expected number of bytes written. Fixes: 7470b5afd150 ("riscv: selftests: Add a pointer masking test") Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie(a)rivosinc.com> --- Changes in v2: - I had ret != 2 for testing, I changed it to be ret != 1. - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241204-fix_warnings_pointer_masking_tests-v1-1-… --- tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c | 19 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c index dee41b7ee3e3..229d85ccff50 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c @@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ static void test_tagged_addr_abi_sysctl(void) { char value; int fd; + int ret; ksft_print_msg("Testing tagged address ABI sysctl\n"); @@ -200,14 +201,24 @@ static void test_tagged_addr_abi_sysctl(void) } value = '1'; - pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); + ret = pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); + if (ret != 1) { + ksft_test_result_fail("Write to /proc/sys/abi/tagged_addr_disabled failed.\n"); + return; + } + ksft_test_result(set_tagged_addr_ctrl(min_pmlen, true) == -EINVAL, "sysctl disabled\n"); value = '0'; - pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); - ksft_test_result(set_tagged_addr_ctrl(min_pmlen, true) == 0, - "sysctl enabled\n"); + ret = pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); + if (ret != 1) { + ksft_test_result_fail("Write to /proc/sys/abi/tagged_addr_disabled failed.\n"); + return; + } + + ksft_test_result(set_tagged_addr_ctrl(min_pmlen, true) == -EINVAL, + "sysctl disabled\n"); set_tagged_addr_ctrl(0, false); --- base-commit: 40384c840ea1944d7c5a392e8975ed088ecf0b37 change-id: 20241204-fix_warnings_pointer_masking_tests-3860e4f35429 -- - Charlie

4 months, 3 weeks

3
7
0 0

[PATCH v3] riscv: selftests: Fix warnings pointer masking test

by Charlie Jenkins

When compiling the pointer masking tests with -Wall this warning is present: pointer_masking.c: In function ‘test_tagged_addr_abi_sysctl’: pointer_masking.c:203:9: warning: ignoring return value of ‘pwrite’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result] 203 | pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ pointer_masking.c:208:9: warning: ignoring return value of ‘pwrite’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result] 208 | pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); I came across this on riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04). Fix this by checking that the number of bytes written equal the expected number of bytes written. Fixes: 7470b5afd150 ("riscv: selftests: Add a pointer masking test") Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie(a)rivosinc.com> --- Changes in v3: - Fix sysctl enabled test case (Drew/Alex) - Move pwrite err condition into goto (Drew) - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241204-fix_warnings_pointer_masking_tests-v2-1-… Changes in v2: - I had ret != 2 for testing, I changed it to be ret != 1. - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241204-fix_warnings_pointer_masking_tests-v1-1-… --- tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c | 17 +++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c index dee41b7ee3e3..2367b24a2b4e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c @@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ static void test_tagged_addr_abi_sysctl(void) { char value; int fd; + int ret; ksft_print_msg("Testing tagged address ABI sysctl\n"); @@ -200,18 +201,30 @@ static void test_tagged_addr_abi_sysctl(void) } value = '1'; - pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); + ret = pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); + if (ret != 1) + goto err_pwrite; + ksft_test_result(set_tagged_addr_ctrl(min_pmlen, true) == -EINVAL, "sysctl disabled\n"); value = '0'; - pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); + ret = pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); + if (ret != 1) + goto err_pwrite; + ksft_test_result(set_tagged_addr_ctrl(min_pmlen, true) == 0, "sysctl enabled\n"); set_tagged_addr_ctrl(0, false); close(fd); + + return; + +err_pwrite: + close(fd); + ksft_test_result_fail("failed to write to /proc/sys/abi/tagged_addr_disabled\n"); } static void test_tagged_addr_abi_pmlen(int pmlen) --- base-commit: 40384c840ea1944d7c5a392e8975ed088ecf0b37 change-id: 20241204-fix_warnings_pointer_masking_tests-3860e4f35429 -- - Charlie

4 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v1] selftests/memfd: Run sysctl tests when PID namespace support is enabled

by Isaac J. Manjarres

The sysctl tests for vm.memfd_noexec rely on the kernel to support PID namespaces (i.e. the kernel is built with CONFIG_PID_NS=y). If the kernel the test runs on does not support PID namespaces, the first sysctl test will fail when attempting to spawn a new thread in a new PID namespace, abort the test, preventing the remaining tests from being run. This is not desirable, as not all kernels need PID namespaces, but can still use the other features provided by memfd. Therefore, only run the sysctl tests if the kernel supports PID namespaces. Otherwise, skip those tests and emit an informative message to let the user know why the sysctl tests are not being run. Fixes: 11f75a01448f ("selftests/memfd: add tests for MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL MFD_EXEC") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # v6.6+ Cc: Jeff Xu <jeffxu(a)google.com> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb(a)google.com> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Isaac J. Manjarres <isaacmanjarres(a)google.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c index 95af2d78fd31..0a0b55516028 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ #include <fcntl.h> #include <linux/memfd.h> #include <sched.h> +#include <stdbool.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <signal.h> @@ -1557,6 +1558,11 @@ static void test_share_fork(char *banner, char *b_suffix) close(fd); } +static bool pid_ns_supported(void) +{ + return access("/proc/self/ns/pid", F_OK) == 0; +} + int main(int argc, char **argv) { pid_t pid; @@ -1591,8 +1597,12 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) test_seal_grow(); test_seal_resize(); - test_sysctl_simple(); - test_sysctl_nested(); + if (pid_ns_supported()) { + test_sysctl_simple(); + test_sysctl_nested(); + } else { + printf("PID namespaces are not supported; skipping sysctl tests\n"); + } test_share_dup("SHARE-DUP", ""); test_share_mmap("SHARE-MMAP", ""); -- 2.47.0.338.g60cca15819-goog

4 months, 3 weeks

2
1
0 0

[PATCH bpf-next 1/1] selftests/bpf: Enable Tx hwtstamp in xdp_hw_metadata

by Song Yoong Siang

Set tx_type to HWTSTAMP_TX_ON to enable hardware timestamping for all outgoing packets. Besides, set XDP_UMEM_TX_METADATA_LEN flag to reserve tx_metadata_len bytes of per-chunk metadata. Signed-off-by: Song Yoong Siang <yoong.siang.song(a)intel.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c index 06266aad2f99..6f7b15d6c6ed 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static int open_xsk(int ifindex, struct xsk *xsk, __u32 queue_id) .fill_size = XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS, .comp_size = XSK_RING_CONS__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS, .frame_size = XSK_UMEM__DEFAULT_FRAME_SIZE, - .flags = XSK_UMEM__DEFAULT_FLAGS, + .flags = XDP_UMEM_TX_METADATA_LEN, .tx_metadata_len = sizeof(struct xsk_tx_metadata), }; __u32 idx = 0; @@ -551,6 +551,7 @@ static void hwtstamp_enable(const char *ifname) { struct hwtstamp_config cfg = { .rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL, + .tx_type = HWTSTAMP_TX_ON, }; hwtstamp_ioctl(SIOCGHWTSTAMP, ifname, &saved_hwtstamp_cfg); -- 2.34.1

4 months, 3 weeks

3
3
0 0

[PATCH] selftests/mm: add fork CoW guard page test

by Lorenzo Stoakes

When we fork anonymous pages, apply a guard page then remove it, the previous CoW mapping is cleared. This might not be obvious to an outside observer without taking some time to think about how the overall process functions, so document that this is the case through a test, which also usefully asserts that the behaviour is as we expect. This is grouped with other, more important, fork tests that ensure that guard pages are correctly propagated on fork. Fix a typo in a nearby comment at the same time. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes(a)oracle.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-pages.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-pages.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-pages.c index 7cdf815d0d63..d8f8dee9ebbd 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-pages.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-pages.c @@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ TEST_F(guard_pages, fork) MAP_ANON | MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0); ASSERT_NE(ptr, MAP_FAILED); - /* Establish guard apges in the first 5 pages. */ + /* Establish guard pages in the first 5 pages. */ ASSERT_EQ(madvise(ptr, 5 * page_size, MADV_GUARD_INSTALL), 0); pid = fork(); @@ -1029,6 +1029,77 @@ TEST_F(guard_pages, fork) ASSERT_EQ(munmap(ptr, 10 * page_size), 0); } +/* + * Assert expected behaviour after we fork populated ranges of anonymous memory + * and then guard and unguard the range. + */ +TEST_F(guard_pages, fork_cow) +{ + const unsigned long page_size = self->page_size; + char *ptr; + pid_t pid; + int i; + + /* Map 10 pages. */ + ptr = mmap(NULL, 10 * page_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, + MAP_ANON | MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0); + ASSERT_NE(ptr, MAP_FAILED); + + /* Populate range. */ + for (i = 0; i < 10 * page_size; i++) { + char chr = 'a' + (i % 26); + + ptr[i] = chr; + } + + pid = fork(); + ASSERT_NE(pid, -1); + if (!pid) { + /* This is the child process now. */ + + /* Ensure the range is as expected. */ + for (i = 0; i < 10 * page_size; i++) { + char expected = 'a' + (i % 26); + char actual = ptr[i]; + + ASSERT_EQ(actual, expected); + } + + /* Establish guard pages across the whole range. */ + ASSERT_EQ(madvise(ptr, 10 * page_size, MADV_GUARD_INSTALL), 0); + /* Remove it. */ + ASSERT_EQ(madvise(ptr, 10 * page_size, MADV_GUARD_REMOVE), 0); + + /* + * By removing the guard pages, the page tables will be + * cleared. Assert that we are looking at the zero page now. + */ + for (i = 0; i < 10 * page_size; i++) { + char actual = ptr[i]; + + ASSERT_EQ(actual, '\0'); + } + + exit(0); + } + + /* Parent process. */ + + /* Parent simply waits on child. */ + waitpid(pid, NULL, 0); + + /* Ensure the range is unchanged in parent anon range. */ + for (i = 0; i < 10 * page_size; i++) { + char expected = 'a' + (i % 26); + char actual = ptr[i]; + + ASSERT_EQ(actual, expected); + } + + /* Cleanup. */ + ASSERT_EQ(munmap(ptr, 10 * page_size), 0); +} + /* * Assert that forking a process with VMAs that do have VM_WIPEONFORK set * behave as expected. -- 2.47.1

4 months, 3 weeks

2
1
0 0

[PATCH v2] selftests/ftrace: adjust offset for kprobe syntax error test

by Hari Bathini

In 'NOFENTRY_ARGS' test case for syntax check, any offset X of `vfs_read+X` except function entry offset (0) fits the criterion, even if that offset is not at instruction boundary, as the parser comes before probing. But with "ENDBR64" instruction on x86, offset 4 is treated as function entry. So, X can't be 4 as well. Thus, 8 was used as offset for the test case. On 64-bit powerpc though, any offset <= 16 can be considered function entry depending on build configuration (see arch_kprobe_on_func_entry() for implementation details). So, use `vfs_read+20` to accommodate that scenario too. Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini(a)linux.ibm.com> --- Changes in v2: * Use 20 as offset for all arches. .../selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_syntax_errors.tc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_syntax_errors.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_syntax_errors.tc index a16c6a6f6055..8f1c58f0c239 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_syntax_errors.tc +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_syntax_errors.tc @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ check_error 'p vfs_read $arg* ^$arg*' # DOUBLE_ARGS if !grep -q 'kernel return probes support:' README; then check_error 'r vfs_read ^$arg*' # NOFENTRY_ARGS fi -check_error 'p vfs_read+8 ^$arg*' # NOFENTRY_ARGS +check_error 'p vfs_read+20 ^$arg*' # NOFENTRY_ARGS check_error 'p vfs_read ^hoge' # NO_BTFARG check_error 'p kfree ^$arg10' # NO_BTFARG (exceed the number of parameters) check_error 'r kfree ^$retval' # NO_RETVAL -- 2.47.0

4 months, 3 weeks

3
5
0 0

[PATCH net-next] selftests: net: cleanup busy_poller.c

by Joe Damato

Fix various integer type conversions by using strtoull and a temporary variable which is bounds checked before being casted into the appropriate cfg_* variable for use by the test program. While here, free the strdup'd cfg string for overall hygenie. Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <jdamato(a)fastly.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/net/busy_poller.c | 86 +++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/busy_poller.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/busy_poller.c index 99b0e8c17fca..ef62d7145598 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/busy_poller.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/busy_poller.c @@ -54,16 +54,16 @@ struct epoll_params { #define EPIOCGPARAMS _IOR(EPOLL_IOC_TYPE, 0x02, struct epoll_params) #endif -static uint32_t cfg_port = 8000; +static uint16_t cfg_port = 8000; static struct in_addr cfg_bind_addr = { .s_addr = INADDR_ANY }; static char *cfg_outfile; static int cfg_max_events = 8; -static int cfg_ifindex; +static uint32_t cfg_ifindex; /* busy poll params */ static uint32_t cfg_busy_poll_usecs; -static uint32_t cfg_busy_poll_budget; -static uint32_t cfg_prefer_busy_poll; +static uint16_t cfg_busy_poll_budget; +static uint8_t cfg_prefer_busy_poll; /* IRQ params */ static uint32_t cfg_defer_hard_irqs; @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ static void usage(const char *filepath) static void parse_opts(int argc, char **argv) { + unsigned long long tmp; int ret; int c; @@ -86,31 +87,40 @@ static void parse_opts(int argc, char **argv) usage(argv[0]); while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, "p:m:b:u:P:g:o:d:r:s:i:")) != -1) { + /* most options take integer values, except o and b, so reduce + * code duplication a bit for the common case by calling + * strtoull here and leave bounds checking and casting per + * option below. + */ + if (c != 'o' && c != 'b') + tmp = strtoull(optarg, NULL, 0); + switch (c) { case 'u': - cfg_busy_poll_usecs = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 0); - if (cfg_busy_poll_usecs == ULONG_MAX || - cfg_busy_poll_usecs > UINT32_MAX) + if (tmp == ULLONG_MAX || tmp > UINT32_MAX) error(1, ERANGE, "busy_poll_usecs too large"); + + cfg_busy_poll_usecs = (uint32_t)tmp; break; case 'P': - cfg_prefer_busy_poll = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 0); - if (cfg_prefer_busy_poll == ULONG_MAX || - cfg_prefer_busy_poll > 1) + if (tmp == ULLONG_MAX || tmp > 1) error(1, ERANGE, "prefer busy poll should be 0 or 1"); + + cfg_prefer_busy_poll = (uint8_t)tmp; break; case 'g': - cfg_busy_poll_budget = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 0); - if (cfg_busy_poll_budget == ULONG_MAX || - cfg_busy_poll_budget > UINT16_MAX) + if (tmp == ULLONG_MAX || tmp > UINT16_MAX) error(1, ERANGE, "busy poll budget must be [0, UINT16_MAX]"); + + cfg_busy_poll_budget = (uint16_t)tmp; break; case 'p': - cfg_port = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 0); - if (cfg_port > UINT16_MAX) + if (tmp == ULLONG_MAX || tmp > UINT16_MAX) error(1, ERANGE, "port must be <= 65535"); + + cfg_port = (uint16_t)tmp; break; case 'b': ret = inet_aton(optarg, &cfg_bind_addr); @@ -124,41 +134,39 @@ static void parse_opts(int argc, char **argv) error(1, 0, "outfile invalid"); break; case 'm': - cfg_max_events = strtol(optarg, NULL, 0); - - if (cfg_max_events == LONG_MIN || - cfg_max_events == LONG_MAX || - cfg_max_events <= 0) + if (tmp == ULLONG_MAX || tmp > INT_MAX) error(1, ERANGE, - "max events must be > 0 and < LONG_MAX"); + "max events must be > 0 and <= INT_MAX"); + + cfg_max_events = (int)tmp; break; case 'd': - cfg_defer_hard_irqs = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 0); - - if (cfg_defer_hard_irqs == ULONG_MAX || - cfg_defer_hard_irqs > INT32_MAX) + if (tmp == ULLONG_MAX || tmp > INT32_MAX) error(1, ERANGE, "defer_hard_irqs must be <= INT32_MAX"); + + cfg_defer_hard_irqs = (uint32_t)tmp; break; case 'r': - cfg_gro_flush_timeout = strtoull(optarg, NULL, 0); - - if (cfg_gro_flush_timeout == ULLONG_MAX) + if (tmp == ULLONG_MAX || tmp > UINT64_MAX) error(1, ERANGE, - "gro_flush_timeout must be < ULLONG_MAX"); + "gro_flush_timeout must be < UINT64_MAX"); + + cfg_gro_flush_timeout = (uint64_t)tmp; break; case 's': - cfg_irq_suspend_timeout = strtoull(optarg, NULL, 0); - - if (cfg_irq_suspend_timeout == ULLONG_MAX) + if (tmp == ULLONG_MAX || tmp > UINT64_MAX) error(1, ERANGE, "irq_suspend_timeout must be < ULLONG_MAX"); + + cfg_irq_suspend_timeout = (uint64_t)tmp; break; case 'i': - cfg_ifindex = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 0); - if (cfg_ifindex == ULONG_MAX) + if (tmp == ULLONG_MAX || tmp > INT_MAX) error(1, ERANGE, - "ifindex must be < ULONG_MAX"); + "ifindex must be <= INT_MAX"); + + cfg_ifindex = (int)tmp; break; } } @@ -277,8 +285,8 @@ static void run_poller(void) * here */ epoll_params.busy_poll_usecs = cfg_busy_poll_usecs; - epoll_params.busy_poll_budget = (uint16_t)cfg_busy_poll_budget; - epoll_params.prefer_busy_poll = (uint8_t)cfg_prefer_busy_poll; + epoll_params.busy_poll_budget = cfg_busy_poll_budget; + epoll_params.prefer_busy_poll = cfg_prefer_busy_poll; epoll_params.__pad = 0; val = 1; @@ -342,5 +350,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) parse_opts(argc, argv); setup_queue(); run_poller(); + + if (cfg_outfile) + free(cfg_outfile); + return 0; } base-commit: 65ae975e97d5aab3ee9dc5ec701b12090572ed43 -- 2.25.1

4 months, 3 weeks

3
4
0 0

[PATCH v4] memfd: `MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL` should not imply `MFD_ALLOW_SEALING`

by Barnabás Pőcze

`MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL` should remove the executable bits and set `F_SEAL_EXEC` to prevent further modifications to the executable bits as per the comment in the uapi header file: not executable and sealed to prevent changing to executable However, commit 105ff5339f498a ("mm/memfd: add MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXEC") that introduced this feature made it so that `MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL` unsets `F_SEAL_SEAL`, essentially acting as a superset of `MFD_ALLOW_SEALING`. Nothing implies that it should be so, and indeed up until the second version of the of the patchset[0] that introduced `MFD_EXEC` and `MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL`, `F_SEAL_SEAL` was not removed, however, it was changed in the third revision of the patchset[1] without a clear explanation. This behaviour is surprising for application developers, there is no documentation that would reveal that `MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL` has the additional effect of `MFD_ALLOW_SEALING`. Additionally, combined with `vm.memfd_noexec=2` it has the effect of making all memfds initially sealable. So do not remove `F_SEAL_SEAL` when `MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL` is requested, thereby returning to the pre-Linux 6.3 behaviour of only allowing sealing when `MFD_ALLOW_SEALING` is specified. Now, this is technically a uapi break. However, the damage is expected to be minimal. To trigger user visible change, a program has to do the following steps: - create memfd: - with `MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL`, - without `MFD_ALLOW_SEALING`; - try to add seals / check the seals. But that seems unlikely to happen intentionally since this change essentially reverts the kernel's behaviour to that of Linux <6.3, so if a program worked correctly on those older kernels, it will likely work correctly after this change. I have used Debian Code Search and GitHub to try to find potential breakages, and I could only find a single one. dbus-broker's memfd_create() wrapper is aware of this implicit `MFD_ALLOW_SEALING` behaviour, and tries to work around it[2]. This workaround will break. Luckily, this only affects the test suite, it does not affect the normal operations of dbus-broker. There is a PR with a fix[3]. I also carried out a smoke test by building a kernel with this change and booting an Arch Linux system into GNOME and Plasma sessions. There was also a previous attempt to address this peculiarity by introducing a new flag[4]. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220805222126.142525-3-jeffxu@google.com/ [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221202013404.163143-3-jeffxu@google.com/ [2]: https://github.com/bus1/dbus-broker/blob/9eb0b7e5826fc76cad7b025bc46f267d4a… [3]: https://github.com/bus1/dbus-broker/pull/366 [4]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230714114753.170814-1-david@readahead.eu/ Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Barnabás Pőcze <pobrn(a)protonmail.com> --- * v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240611231409.3899809-1-jeffxu@chromium.o… * v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240524033933.135049-1-jeffxu@google.com/ * v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240513191544.94754-1-pobrn@protonmail.co… This fourth version returns to removing the inconsistency as opposed to documenting its existence, with the same code change as v1 but with a somewhat extended commit message. This is sent because I believe it is worth at least a try; it can be easily reverted if bigger application breakages are discovered than initially imagined. --- mm/memfd.c | 9 ++++----- tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c index 7d8d3ab3fa37..8b7f6afee21d 100644 --- a/mm/memfd.c +++ b/mm/memfd.c @@ -356,12 +356,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create, inode->i_mode &= ~0111; file_seals = memfd_file_seals_ptr(file); - if (file_seals) { - *file_seals &= ~F_SEAL_SEAL; + if (file_seals) *file_seals |= F_SEAL_EXEC; - } - } else if (flags & MFD_ALLOW_SEALING) { - /* MFD_EXEC and MFD_ALLOW_SEALING are set */ + } + + if (flags & MFD_ALLOW_SEALING) { file_seals = memfd_file_seals_ptr(file); if (file_seals) *file_seals &= ~F_SEAL_SEAL; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c index 95af2d78fd31..7b78329f65b6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static void test_noexec_seal(void) mfd_def_size, MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL); mfd_assert_mode(fd, 0666); - mfd_assert_has_seals(fd, F_SEAL_EXEC); + mfd_assert_has_seals(fd, F_SEAL_SEAL | F_SEAL_EXEC); mfd_fail_chmod(fd, 0777); close(fd); } -- 2.45.2

4 months, 3 weeks

4
5
0 0

[PATCH net-next v2] selftests/net: call sendmmsg via udpgso_bench.sh

by Kenjiro Nakayama

Currently, sendmmsg is implemented in udpgso_bench_tx.c, but it is not called by any test script. This patch adds a test for sendmmsg in udpgso_bench.sh. This allows for basic API testing and benchmarking comparisons with GSO. Signed-off-by: Kenjiro Nakayama <nakayamakenjiro(a)gmail.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso_bench.sh | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso_bench.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso_bench.sh index 640bc43452fa..88fa1d53ba2b 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso_bench.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso_bench.sh @@ -92,6 +92,9 @@ run_udp() { echo "udp" run_in_netns ${args} + echo "udp sendmmsg" + run_in_netns ${args} -m + echo "udp gso" run_in_netns ${args} -S 0 -- 2.39.3 (Apple Git-146)

4 months, 3 weeks

4
3
0 0

[PATCH] riscv: selftests: Fix warnings pointer masking test

by Charlie Jenkins

When compiling the pointer masking tests with -Wall this warning is present: pointer_masking.c: In function ‘test_tagged_addr_abi_sysctl’: pointer_masking.c:203:9: warning: ignoring return value of ‘pwrite’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result] 203 | pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ pointer_masking.c:208:9: warning: ignoring return value of ‘pwrite’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result] 208 | pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); I came across this on riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04). Fix this by checking that the number of bytes written equal the expected number of bytes written. Fixes: 7470b5afd150 ("riscv: selftests: Add a pointer masking test") Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie(a)rivosinc.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c | 19 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c index dee41b7ee3e3..5ae941e9ac73 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c @@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ static void test_tagged_addr_abi_sysctl(void) { char value; int fd; + int ret; ksft_print_msg("Testing tagged address ABI sysctl\n"); @@ -200,14 +201,24 @@ static void test_tagged_addr_abi_sysctl(void) } value = '1'; - pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); + ret = pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); + if (ret != 1) { + ksft_test_result_fail("Write to /proc/sys/abi/tagged_addr_disabled failed.\n"); + return; + } + ksft_test_result(set_tagged_addr_ctrl(min_pmlen, true) == -EINVAL, "sysctl disabled\n"); value = '0'; - pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); - ksft_test_result(set_tagged_addr_ctrl(min_pmlen, true) == 0, - "sysctl enabled\n"); + ret = pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); + if (ret != 2) { + ksft_test_result_fail("Write to /proc/sys/abi/tagged_addr_disabled failed.\n"); + return; + } + + ksft_test_result(set_tagged_addr_ctrl(min_pmlen, true) == -EINVAL, + "sysctl disabled\n"); set_tagged_addr_ctrl(0, false); --- base-commit: 40384c840ea1944d7c5a392e8975ed088ecf0b37 change-id: 20241204-fix_warnings_pointer_masking_tests-3860e4f35429 -- - Charlie

4 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror