April 2024 - Linux-kselftest-mirror

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 6/7] selftests: timers: Fix valid-adjtimex signed left-shift undefined behavior

by Sasha Levin

From: John Stultz <jstultz(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 076361362122a6d8a4c45f172ced5576b2d4a50d ] The struct adjtimex freq field takes a signed value who's units are in shifted (<<16) parts-per-million. Unfortunately for negative adjustments, the straightforward use of: freq = ppm << 16 trips undefined behavior warnings with clang: valid-adjtimex.c:66:6: warning: shifting a negative signed value is undefined [-Wshift-negative-value] -499<<16, ~~~~^ valid-adjtimex.c:67:6: warning: shifting a negative signed value is undefined [-Wshift-negative-value] -450<<16, ~~~~^ .. Fix it by using a multiply by (1 << 16) instead of shifting negative values in the valid-adjtimex test case. Align the values for better readability. Reported-by: Lee Jones <joneslee(a)google.com> Reported-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240409202222.2830476-1-jstultz@google.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0c6d4f0d-2064-4444-986b-1d1ed782135f@collabora… Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- .../testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c | 73 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c index 48b9a803235a8..d13ebde203221 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c @@ -21,9 +21,6 @@ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. */ - - - #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <time.h> @@ -62,45 +59,47 @@ int clear_time_state(void) #define NUM_FREQ_OUTOFRANGE 4 #define NUM_FREQ_INVALID 2 +#define SHIFTED_PPM (1 << 16) + long valid_freq[NUM_FREQ_VALID] = { - -499<<16, - -450<<16, - -400<<16, - -350<<16, - -300<<16, - -250<<16, - -200<<16, - -150<<16, - -100<<16, - -75<<16, - -50<<16, - -25<<16, - -10<<16, - -5<<16, - -1<<16, + -499 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -450 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -400 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -350 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -300 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -250 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -200 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -150 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -100 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -75 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -50 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -25 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -10 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -5 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -1 * SHIFTED_PPM, -1000, - 1<<16, - 5<<16, - 10<<16, - 25<<16, - 50<<16, - 75<<16, - 100<<16, - 150<<16, - 200<<16, - 250<<16, - 300<<16, - 350<<16, - 400<<16, - 450<<16, - 499<<16, + 1 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 5 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 10 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 25 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 50 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 75 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 100 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 150 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 200 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 250 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 300 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 350 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 400 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 450 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 499 * SHIFTED_PPM, }; long outofrange_freq[NUM_FREQ_OUTOFRANGE] = { - -1000<<16, - -550<<16, - 550<<16, - 1000<<16, + -1000 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -550 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 550 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 1000 * SHIFTED_PPM, }; #define LONG_MAX (~0UL>>1) -- 2.43.0

1 year, 8 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 8/9] selftests: timers: Fix valid-adjtimex signed left-shift undefined behavior

by Sasha Levin

From: John Stultz <jstultz(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 076361362122a6d8a4c45f172ced5576b2d4a50d ] The struct adjtimex freq field takes a signed value who's units are in shifted (<<16) parts-per-million. Unfortunately for negative adjustments, the straightforward use of: freq = ppm << 16 trips undefined behavior warnings with clang: valid-adjtimex.c:66:6: warning: shifting a negative signed value is undefined [-Wshift-negative-value] -499<<16, ~~~~^ valid-adjtimex.c:67:6: warning: shifting a negative signed value is undefined [-Wshift-negative-value] -450<<16, ~~~~^ .. Fix it by using a multiply by (1 << 16) instead of shifting negative values in the valid-adjtimex test case. Align the values for better readability. Reported-by: Lee Jones <joneslee(a)google.com> Reported-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240409202222.2830476-1-jstultz@google.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0c6d4f0d-2064-4444-986b-1d1ed782135f@collabora… Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- .../testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c | 73 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c index 48b9a803235a8..d13ebde203221 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c @@ -21,9 +21,6 @@ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. */ - - - #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <time.h> @@ -62,45 +59,47 @@ int clear_time_state(void) #define NUM_FREQ_OUTOFRANGE 4 #define NUM_FREQ_INVALID 2 +#define SHIFTED_PPM (1 << 16) + long valid_freq[NUM_FREQ_VALID] = { - -499<<16, - -450<<16, - -400<<16, - -350<<16, - -300<<16, - -250<<16, - -200<<16, - -150<<16, - -100<<16, - -75<<16, - -50<<16, - -25<<16, - -10<<16, - -5<<16, - -1<<16, + -499 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -450 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -400 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -350 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -300 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -250 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -200 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -150 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -100 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -75 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -50 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -25 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -10 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -5 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -1 * SHIFTED_PPM, -1000, - 1<<16, - 5<<16, - 10<<16, - 25<<16, - 50<<16, - 75<<16, - 100<<16, - 150<<16, - 200<<16, - 250<<16, - 300<<16, - 350<<16, - 400<<16, - 450<<16, - 499<<16, + 1 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 5 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 10 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 25 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 50 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 75 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 100 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 150 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 200 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 250 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 300 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 350 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 400 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 450 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 499 * SHIFTED_PPM, }; long outofrange_freq[NUM_FREQ_OUTOFRANGE] = { - -1000<<16, - -550<<16, - 550<<16, - 1000<<16, + -1000 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -550 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 550 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 1000 * SHIFTED_PPM, }; #define LONG_MAX (~0UL>>1) -- 2.43.0

1 year, 8 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 9/9] selftests: timers: Fix valid-adjtimex signed left-shift undefined behavior

by Sasha Levin

From: John Stultz <jstultz(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 076361362122a6d8a4c45f172ced5576b2d4a50d ] The struct adjtimex freq field takes a signed value who's units are in shifted (<<16) parts-per-million. Unfortunately for negative adjustments, the straightforward use of: freq = ppm << 16 trips undefined behavior warnings with clang: valid-adjtimex.c:66:6: warning: shifting a negative signed value is undefined [-Wshift-negative-value] -499<<16, ~~~~^ valid-adjtimex.c:67:6: warning: shifting a negative signed value is undefined [-Wshift-negative-value] -450<<16, ~~~~^ .. Fix it by using a multiply by (1 << 16) instead of shifting negative values in the valid-adjtimex test case. Align the values for better readability. Reported-by: Lee Jones <joneslee(a)google.com> Reported-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240409202222.2830476-1-jstultz@google.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0c6d4f0d-2064-4444-986b-1d1ed782135f@collabora… Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- .../testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c | 73 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c index 48b9a803235a8..d13ebde203221 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c @@ -21,9 +21,6 @@ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. */ - - - #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <time.h> @@ -62,45 +59,47 @@ int clear_time_state(void) #define NUM_FREQ_OUTOFRANGE 4 #define NUM_FREQ_INVALID 2 +#define SHIFTED_PPM (1 << 16) + long valid_freq[NUM_FREQ_VALID] = { - -499<<16, - -450<<16, - -400<<16, - -350<<16, - -300<<16, - -250<<16, - -200<<16, - -150<<16, - -100<<16, - -75<<16, - -50<<16, - -25<<16, - -10<<16, - -5<<16, - -1<<16, + -499 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -450 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -400 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -350 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -300 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -250 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -200 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -150 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -100 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -75 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -50 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -25 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -10 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -5 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -1 * SHIFTED_PPM, -1000, - 1<<16, - 5<<16, - 10<<16, - 25<<16, - 50<<16, - 75<<16, - 100<<16, - 150<<16, - 200<<16, - 250<<16, - 300<<16, - 350<<16, - 400<<16, - 450<<16, - 499<<16, + 1 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 5 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 10 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 25 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 50 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 75 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 100 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 150 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 200 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 250 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 300 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 350 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 400 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 450 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 499 * SHIFTED_PPM, }; long outofrange_freq[NUM_FREQ_OUTOFRANGE] = { - -1000<<16, - -550<<16, - 550<<16, - 1000<<16, + -1000 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -550 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 550 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 1000 * SHIFTED_PPM, }; #define LONG_MAX (~0UL>>1) -- 2.43.0

1 year, 8 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 09/10] selftests: timers: Fix valid-adjtimex signed left-shift undefined behavior

by Sasha Levin

From: John Stultz <jstultz(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 076361362122a6d8a4c45f172ced5576b2d4a50d ] The struct adjtimex freq field takes a signed value who's units are in shifted (<<16) parts-per-million. Unfortunately for negative adjustments, the straightforward use of: freq = ppm << 16 trips undefined behavior warnings with clang: valid-adjtimex.c:66:6: warning: shifting a negative signed value is undefined [-Wshift-negative-value] -499<<16, ~~~~^ valid-adjtimex.c:67:6: warning: shifting a negative signed value is undefined [-Wshift-negative-value] -450<<16, ~~~~^ .. Fix it by using a multiply by (1 << 16) instead of shifting negative values in the valid-adjtimex test case. Align the values for better readability. Reported-by: Lee Jones <joneslee(a)google.com> Reported-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240409202222.2830476-1-jstultz@google.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0c6d4f0d-2064-4444-986b-1d1ed782135f@collabora… Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- .../testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c | 73 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c index 48b9a803235a8..d13ebde203221 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c @@ -21,9 +21,6 @@ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. */ - - - #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <time.h> @@ -62,45 +59,47 @@ int clear_time_state(void) #define NUM_FREQ_OUTOFRANGE 4 #define NUM_FREQ_INVALID 2 +#define SHIFTED_PPM (1 << 16) + long valid_freq[NUM_FREQ_VALID] = { - -499<<16, - -450<<16, - -400<<16, - -350<<16, - -300<<16, - -250<<16, - -200<<16, - -150<<16, - -100<<16, - -75<<16, - -50<<16, - -25<<16, - -10<<16, - -5<<16, - -1<<16, + -499 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -450 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -400 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -350 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -300 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -250 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -200 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -150 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -100 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -75 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -50 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -25 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -10 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -5 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -1 * SHIFTED_PPM, -1000, - 1<<16, - 5<<16, - 10<<16, - 25<<16, - 50<<16, - 75<<16, - 100<<16, - 150<<16, - 200<<16, - 250<<16, - 300<<16, - 350<<16, - 400<<16, - 450<<16, - 499<<16, + 1 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 5 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 10 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 25 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 50 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 75 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 100 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 150 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 200 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 250 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 300 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 350 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 400 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 450 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 499 * SHIFTED_PPM, }; long outofrange_freq[NUM_FREQ_OUTOFRANGE] = { - -1000<<16, - -550<<16, - 550<<16, - 1000<<16, + -1000 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -550 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 550 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 1000 * SHIFTED_PPM, }; #define LONG_MAX (~0UL>>1) -- 2.43.0

1 year, 8 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 15/19] selftests: timers: Fix valid-adjtimex signed left-shift undefined behavior

by Sasha Levin

From: John Stultz <jstultz(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 076361362122a6d8a4c45f172ced5576b2d4a50d ] The struct adjtimex freq field takes a signed value who's units are in shifted (<<16) parts-per-million. Unfortunately for negative adjustments, the straightforward use of: freq = ppm << 16 trips undefined behavior warnings with clang: valid-adjtimex.c:66:6: warning: shifting a negative signed value is undefined [-Wshift-negative-value] -499<<16, ~~~~^ valid-adjtimex.c:67:6: warning: shifting a negative signed value is undefined [-Wshift-negative-value] -450<<16, ~~~~^ .. Fix it by using a multiply by (1 << 16) instead of shifting negative values in the valid-adjtimex test case. Align the values for better readability. Reported-by: Lee Jones <joneslee(a)google.com> Reported-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240409202222.2830476-1-jstultz@google.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0c6d4f0d-2064-4444-986b-1d1ed782135f@collabora… Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- .../testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c | 73 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c index 48b9a803235a8..d13ebde203221 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c @@ -21,9 +21,6 @@ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. */ - - - #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <time.h> @@ -62,45 +59,47 @@ int clear_time_state(void) #define NUM_FREQ_OUTOFRANGE 4 #define NUM_FREQ_INVALID 2 +#define SHIFTED_PPM (1 << 16) + long valid_freq[NUM_FREQ_VALID] = { - -499<<16, - -450<<16, - -400<<16, - -350<<16, - -300<<16, - -250<<16, - -200<<16, - -150<<16, - -100<<16, - -75<<16, - -50<<16, - -25<<16, - -10<<16, - -5<<16, - -1<<16, + -499 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -450 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -400 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -350 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -300 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -250 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -200 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -150 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -100 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -75 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -50 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -25 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -10 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -5 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -1 * SHIFTED_PPM, -1000, - 1<<16, - 5<<16, - 10<<16, - 25<<16, - 50<<16, - 75<<16, - 100<<16, - 150<<16, - 200<<16, - 250<<16, - 300<<16, - 350<<16, - 400<<16, - 450<<16, - 499<<16, + 1 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 5 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 10 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 25 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 50 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 75 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 100 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 150 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 200 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 250 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 300 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 350 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 400 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 450 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 499 * SHIFTED_PPM, }; long outofrange_freq[NUM_FREQ_OUTOFRANGE] = { - -1000<<16, - -550<<16, - 550<<16, - 1000<<16, + -1000 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -550 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 550 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 1000 * SHIFTED_PPM, }; #define LONG_MAX (~0UL>>1) -- 2.43.0

1 year, 8 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 22/29] selftests: timers: Fix valid-adjtimex signed left-shift undefined behavior

by Sasha Levin

From: John Stultz <jstultz(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 076361362122a6d8a4c45f172ced5576b2d4a50d ] The struct adjtimex freq field takes a signed value who's units are in shifted (<<16) parts-per-million. Unfortunately for negative adjustments, the straightforward use of: freq = ppm << 16 trips undefined behavior warnings with clang: valid-adjtimex.c:66:6: warning: shifting a negative signed value is undefined [-Wshift-negative-value] -499<<16, ~~~~^ valid-adjtimex.c:67:6: warning: shifting a negative signed value is undefined [-Wshift-negative-value] -450<<16, ~~~~^ .. Fix it by using a multiply by (1 << 16) instead of shifting negative values in the valid-adjtimex test case. Align the values for better readability. Reported-by: Lee Jones <joneslee(a)google.com> Reported-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240409202222.2830476-1-jstultz@google.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0c6d4f0d-2064-4444-986b-1d1ed782135f@collabora… Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- .../testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c | 73 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c index 48b9a803235a8..d13ebde203221 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c @@ -21,9 +21,6 @@ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. */ - - - #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <time.h> @@ -62,45 +59,47 @@ int clear_time_state(void) #define NUM_FREQ_OUTOFRANGE 4 #define NUM_FREQ_INVALID 2 +#define SHIFTED_PPM (1 << 16) + long valid_freq[NUM_FREQ_VALID] = { - -499<<16, - -450<<16, - -400<<16, - -350<<16, - -300<<16, - -250<<16, - -200<<16, - -150<<16, - -100<<16, - -75<<16, - -50<<16, - -25<<16, - -10<<16, - -5<<16, - -1<<16, + -499 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -450 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -400 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -350 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -300 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -250 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -200 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -150 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -100 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -75 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -50 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -25 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -10 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -5 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -1 * SHIFTED_PPM, -1000, - 1<<16, - 5<<16, - 10<<16, - 25<<16, - 50<<16, - 75<<16, - 100<<16, - 150<<16, - 200<<16, - 250<<16, - 300<<16, - 350<<16, - 400<<16, - 450<<16, - 499<<16, + 1 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 5 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 10 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 25 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 50 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 75 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 100 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 150 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 200 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 250 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 300 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 350 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 400 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 450 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 499 * SHIFTED_PPM, }; long outofrange_freq[NUM_FREQ_OUTOFRANGE] = { - -1000<<16, - -550<<16, - 550<<16, - 1000<<16, + -1000 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -550 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 550 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 1000 * SHIFTED_PPM, }; #define LONG_MAX (~0UL>>1) -- 2.43.0

1 year, 8 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.8 34/43] selftests: timers: Fix valid-adjtimex signed left-shift undefined behavior

by Sasha Levin

From: John Stultz <jstultz(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 076361362122a6d8a4c45f172ced5576b2d4a50d ] The struct adjtimex freq field takes a signed value who's units are in shifted (<<16) parts-per-million. Unfortunately for negative adjustments, the straightforward use of: freq = ppm << 16 trips undefined behavior warnings with clang: valid-adjtimex.c:66:6: warning: shifting a negative signed value is undefined [-Wshift-negative-value] -499<<16, ~~~~^ valid-adjtimex.c:67:6: warning: shifting a negative signed value is undefined [-Wshift-negative-value] -450<<16, ~~~~^ .. Fix it by using a multiply by (1 << 16) instead of shifting negative values in the valid-adjtimex test case. Align the values for better readability. Reported-by: Lee Jones <joneslee(a)google.com> Reported-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240409202222.2830476-1-jstultz@google.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0c6d4f0d-2064-4444-986b-1d1ed782135f@collabora… Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- .../testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c | 73 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c index 48b9a803235a8..d13ebde203221 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c @@ -21,9 +21,6 @@ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. */ - - - #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <time.h> @@ -62,45 +59,47 @@ int clear_time_state(void) #define NUM_FREQ_OUTOFRANGE 4 #define NUM_FREQ_INVALID 2 +#define SHIFTED_PPM (1 << 16) + long valid_freq[NUM_FREQ_VALID] = { - -499<<16, - -450<<16, - -400<<16, - -350<<16, - -300<<16, - -250<<16, - -200<<16, - -150<<16, - -100<<16, - -75<<16, - -50<<16, - -25<<16, - -10<<16, - -5<<16, - -1<<16, + -499 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -450 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -400 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -350 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -300 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -250 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -200 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -150 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -100 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -75 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -50 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -25 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -10 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -5 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -1 * SHIFTED_PPM, -1000, - 1<<16, - 5<<16, - 10<<16, - 25<<16, - 50<<16, - 75<<16, - 100<<16, - 150<<16, - 200<<16, - 250<<16, - 300<<16, - 350<<16, - 400<<16, - 450<<16, - 499<<16, + 1 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 5 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 10 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 25 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 50 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 75 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 100 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 150 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 200 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 250 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 300 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 350 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 400 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 450 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 499 * SHIFTED_PPM, }; long outofrange_freq[NUM_FREQ_OUTOFRANGE] = { - -1000<<16, - -550<<16, - 550<<16, - 1000<<16, + -1000 * SHIFTED_PPM, + -550 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 550 * SHIFTED_PPM, + 1000 * SHIFTED_PPM, }; #define LONG_MAX (~0UL>>1) -- 2.43.0

1 year, 8 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH] selftests: kvm: fix undeclared function error

by Muhammad Usama Anjum

Include kvm_test_harness.h first which will include kselftest_harness.h for _GNU_SOURCE to get defined first before inclusion of stdio.h. It is required for declaration of asprintf(). It removes the following build error caught by clang-17: In file included from x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c:12: In file included from include/kvm_test_harness.h:11: ../kselftest_harness.h:1169:2: error: call to undeclared function 'asprintf'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 1169 | asprintf(&test_name, "%s%s%s.%s", f->name, | ^ Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c index f3c2239228b10..75306dcfaad6c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/fix_hypercall_test.c @@ -4,12 +4,12 @@ * * Tests for KVM paravirtual feature disablement */ +#include "kvm_test_harness.h" #include <asm/kvm_para.h> #include <linux/kvm_para.h> #include <linux/stringify.h> #include <stdint.h> -#include "kvm_test_harness.h" #include "apic.h" #include "test_util.h" #include "kvm_util.h" -- 2.39.2

1 year, 8 months

2
2
0 0

[PATCH v3 00/15] Add support for suppressing warning backtraces

by Guenter Roeck

Some unit tests intentionally trigger warning backtraces by passing bad parameters to kernel API functions. Such unit tests typically check the return value from such calls, not the existence of the warning backtrace. Such intentionally generated warning backtraces are neither desirable nor useful for a number of reasons. - They can result in overlooked real problems. - A warning that suddenly starts to show up in unit tests needs to be investigated and has to be marked to be ignored, for example by adjusting filter scripts. Such filters are ad-hoc because there is no real standard format for warnings. On top of that, such filter scripts would require constant maintenance. One option to address problem would be to add messages such as "expected warning backtraces start / end here" to the kernel log. However, that would again require filter scripts, it might result in missing real problematic warning backtraces triggered while the test is running, and the irrelevant backtrace(s) would still clog the kernel log. Solve the problem by providing a means to identify and suppress specific warning backtraces while executing test code. Support suppressing multiple backtraces while at the same time limiting changes to generic code to the absolute minimum. Architecture specific changes are kept at minimum by retaining function names only if both CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE and CONFIG_KUNIT are enabled. The first patch of the series introduces the necessary infrastructure. The second patch introduces support for counting suppressed backtraces. This capability is used in patch three to implement unit tests. Patch four documents the new API. The next two patches add support for suppressing backtraces in drm_rect and dev_addr_lists unit tests. These patches are intended to serve as examples for the use of the functionality introduced with this series. The remaining patches implement the necessary changes for all architectures with GENERIC_BUG support. With CONFIG_KUNIT enabled, image size increase with this series applied is approximately 1%. The image size increase (and with it the functionality introduced by this series) can be avoided by disabling CONFIG_KUNIT_SUPPRESS_BACKTRACE. This series is based on the RFC patch and subsequent discussion at https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-kselftest/patch/02546e59-1afe-4b… and offers a more comprehensive solution of the problem discussed there. Design note: Function pointers are only added to the __bug_table section if both CONFIG_KUNIT_SUPPRESS_BACKTRACE and CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE are enabled to avoid image size increases if CONFIG_KUNIT is disabled. There would be some benefits to adding those pointers all the time (reduced complexity, ability to display function names in BUG/WARNING messages). That change, if desired, can be made later. Checkpatch note: Remaining checkpatch errors and warnings were deliberately ignored. Some are triggered by matching coding style or by comments interpreted as code, others by assembler macros which are disliked by checkpatch. Suggestions for improvements are welcome. Changes since RFC: - Introduced CONFIG_KUNIT_SUPPRESS_BACKTRACE - Minor cleanups and bug fixes - Added support for all affected architectures - Added support for counting suppressed warnings - Added unit tests using those counters - Added patch to suppress warning backtraces in dev_addr_lists tests Changes since v1: - Rebased to v6.9-rc1 - Added Tested-by:, Acked-by:, and Reviewed-by: tags [I retained those tags since there have been no functional changes] - Introduced KUNIT_SUPPRESS_BACKTRACE configuration option, enabled by default. Changes since v2: - Rebased to v6.9-rc2 - Added comments to drm warning suppression explaining why it is needed. - Added patch to move conditional code in arch/sh/include/asm/bug.h to avoid kerneldoc warning - Added architecture maintainers to Cc: for architecture specific patches - No functional changes ---------------------------------------------------------------- Guenter Roeck (15): bug/kunit: Core support for suppressing warning backtraces kunit: bug: Count suppressed warning backtraces kunit: Add test cases for backtrace warning suppression kunit: Add documentation for warning backtrace suppression API drm: Suppress intentional warning backtraces in scaling unit tests net: kunit: Suppress lock warning noise at end of dev_addr_lists tests x86: Add support for suppressing warning backtraces arm64: Add support for suppressing warning backtraces loongarch: Add support for suppressing warning backtraces parisc: Add support for suppressing warning backtraces s390: Add support for suppressing warning backtraces sh: Add support for suppressing warning backtraces sh: Move defines needed for suppressing warning backtraces riscv: Add support for suppressing warning backtraces powerpc: Add support for suppressing warning backtraces Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 30 ++++++++- arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-bug.h | 29 ++++++--- arch/arm64/include/asm/bug.h | 8 ++- arch/loongarch/include/asm/bug.h | 38 ++++++++---- arch/parisc/include/asm/bug.h | 29 ++++++--- arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h | 37 +++++++++--- arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h | 38 ++++++++---- arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h | 17 +++++- arch/sh/include/asm/bug.h | 28 +++++++-- arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h | 21 +++++-- drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c | 16 +++++ include/asm-generic/bug.h | 16 ++++- include/kunit/bug.h | 56 +++++++++++++++++ include/kunit/test.h | 1 + include/linux/bug.h | 13 ++++ lib/bug.c | 51 ++++++++++++++-- lib/kunit/Kconfig | 9 +++ lib/kunit/Makefile | 7 ++- lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/kunit/bug.c | 42 +++++++++++++ net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c | 6 ++ 21 files changed, 524 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/kunit/bug.h create mode 100644 lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c create mode 100644 lib/kunit/bug.c

1 year, 8 months

7
26
0 0

[RFC PATCH 0/10] Cleaning up the KVM clock mess

by David Woodhouse

I lied, there aren't three different definitions of the KVM clock. The fourth is on i386, where it's still based on CLOCK_MONOTONIC (well, boot time which might as well be the same sine we offset it anyway). If we fix *that* to be based on CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW then we can rip out a whole bunch of mechanisms which were added to cope with NTP frequency skew. This cleans up the mess and gets us back down to the two unavoidable definitions of the KVM clock: when the host and guest TSCs are well behaved and in sync, it's in "master clock" mode where it's defined as a simple arithmetic function of the guest TSC, otherwise it's clamped to the host's CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW. It includes Jack's KVM_[GS]ET_CLOCK_GUEST patch to allow accurate migration. Also my KVM_VCPU_TSC_SCALE which exposes the precise TSC scaling factors. This is needed to get accurate migration of the guest TSC, and can *also* be used by userspace to have vDSO-style access to the KVM clock. Thus allowing hypercalls and other emulated clock devices (e.g. PIT, HPET, ACPI timer) to be based on the KVM clock too, giving *consistency* across a live migration. I do still need to fix KVM_REQ_MASTERCLOCK_UPDATE so that it doesn't clamp the clock back to CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW; we should *update* the ka->kvmclock_offset when we've been running in use_master_clock mode. Should probably do that in kvm_arch_hardware_disable() for timekeeping across hibernation too, but I haven't finished working that one out. I think there are still some places left where KVM reads the time twice in close(ish) succession and then assumes they were at the *same* time, which I'll audit and fix too. I also need to flesh out the test cases and do some real testing from VMMs, but I think it's ready for some heckling at least. https://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/linux.git/shortlog/refs/heads/clocks David Woodhouse (8): KVM: x86/xen: Do not corrupt KVM clock in kvm_xen_shared_info_init() KVM: x86: Improve accuracy of KVM clock when TSC scaling is in force KVM: x86: Explicitly disable TSC scaling without CONSTANT_TSC KVM: x86: Add KVM_VCPU_TSC_SCALE and fix the documentation on TSC migration KVM: x86: Avoid NTP frequency skew for KVM clock on 32-bit host KVM: x86: Remove periodic global clock updates KVM: x86: Kill KVM_REQ_GLOBAL_CLOCK_UPDATE KVM: x86: Fix KVM clock precision in __get_kvmclock() Jack Allister (2): KVM: x86: Add KVM_[GS]ET_CLOCK_GUEST for accurate KVM clock migration KVM: selftests: Add KVM/PV clock selftest to prove timer correction Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 37 ++ Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/vcpu.rst | 115 ++++-- arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 +- arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 6 + arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 3 +- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 438 +++++++++++++--------- arch/x86/kvm/xen.c | 4 +- include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 3 + tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pvclock_test.c | 192 ++++++++++ 11 files changed, 600 insertions(+), 209 deletions(-)

1 year, 8 months

3
29
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror April 2024