linaro-toolchain

linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org

7 participants
5663 discussions

by Bernie Ogden

=Progress= GNU Cauldron TCWG Sprint [8/10] * Really helpful to meet (almost) everybody * Some useful discussion, too memcpy on A15 - TCWG-390 [1/10] * Should have let this lie but I had an odd 1/2 day and some data begging to be looked at * Turned out I'd fat-fingered the wrong data * But I gained more evidence suggesting that cortex-strings benchmark is too noisy (Non-sprint) meetings/mail etc [1/10] =Plan= cbuild2 benchmarking * Fit what I have into Rob's worldview * Hopefully convert it into some reviewable patches Follow up on some notes from Cauldron, sprint

11 years, 4 months

[ACTIVITY] Week 30

by Renato Golin

== Progress == * GNU Cauldron (4/10) - GCC+LLVM presentation had some positive reviews - Discussed sanitizers roadmap - Very interesting meeting with QuIC * TCWG Sprint (4/10) - Mostly about GNU tools - Team Mission streamlined, looking good - LLVM roadmap attracted some attention - We could have some bite-sized work from other team members? * Release 3.5 testing (TCWG-476 2/10) - No test regressions - Spotted some benchmark regressions - ARMv7 is overall the same on EEMBC - AArch64 is overall 10% faster on EEMBC * Weekend working, Friday off == Plan == * Release week! - Investigate 3.5 performance regressions on v7 - Work around the lack of perf on v8? - Run SPEC on both v7 and v8 and spot regressions

11 years, 4 months

[Activity] 19-25 JULY 2014

by Venkataramanan Kumar

== Progress == * Attend GNU Cauldron. * TCWG Sprint (8/10) - Participated in Discussions about TCWG/GNU tools. - Partcipated in Discussions with ARM mainatiners. - Discussed about Connect plans. - LLVM status. - Attend Backport Demo by Yvan / some Bug fix Activity. * Friday off traveling back home (2/10) == Plan == * Continue LTO bootstrap issue * Benchmark Core mark with LTO * Upstream patch review. == Issues == * Large Memory Model put on hold now. * Waiting on ARM on Aarch64 SYS V ABI.

11 years, 4 months

[Weekly] 21-25 JULY 2014

by Michael Collison

== This week == * TCWG Sprint (8/10) - Validation process greatly clarified including roadmap * Launchpad 1318831 - Invalid unpoisoning of stack redzones on ARM (2/10) - Finished validating and working thru git review isses with Launchpad == Next week == * Begin neon intrinsic testing * I will be off on Monday and Tuesday

11 years, 4 months

help, here is a armV8 32bit question for linaro 4.8: the code I given below adopt sembedding ARMV8 assembly , but the compile result with Linaro GCC 4.8 aarch32 is not correct

by Panshilin (Peter)

Hi all concerned: this test code I given below: AARCH32 [https://email-cn04.huawei.com/owa/14.3.158.1/themes/base/pgrs-sm.gif] Test function[X][X] { volatile unsigned int val0 = 0; volatile unsigned int val1 = 0; asm volatile(“mrrc p15, 1, %0, %1, c15” : “=r”(val0), “=r”(val1)) val0 &= ~(1<<6); val1 &= ~(1<<6); asm volatile(“mcrr p15, 1, %0, %1, c15” : “=r”(val0), “=r”(val1)); } After compiling, the result is: mrrc 15, 1, r2, r3, cr15 str r2, [fp, #-28] str r3, [fp, #-24] ldr r3, [fp, #-28] bic r3, r3, #64; str r3, [fp, #-28] ldr r3, [fp, #-24] bic r3, r3, #64 str r3, [fp, #-24] mcrr 15, 1, r2, r3, cr15 obviously , it is not what I expect. I have val0 an vl1 two vars, but the compiling result is only one val takes effect. especia I have to mention is AARCH32. thanks. Peter

11 years, 4 months

FW: Request received: accessing toolchain source releases - Member user

by Scott Douglass

Hi, Do you happen to know the answer to the git/svn questions below? Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: LDTS [mailto:support@linaro.zendesk.com] Sent: 25 July 2014 08:43 To: Scott Douglass Subject: Request received: accessing toolchain source releases - Member user Thank you for contacting Linaro. Your request (#927 <https://support.linaro.org/requests/927> ) has been received and is being reviewed by Linaro Developer Technical Support (LDTS). One of our Support agents will be in contact with you as soon as possible. If you would like our agent to contact you via phone, please include your phone number in the comments. To view your ticket and/or add additional comments, reply to this email or click the link below: http://support.linaro.org/requests/927 Scott Douglass Jul 25 16:43 Hi, I’ve been looking at https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain (https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain) and I see the Tree links that give me the git repository and commit id for the current releases of the toolchains (for example, 4.9-2014.06-1 => https://git.linaro.org/toolchain/gcc.git/commit/56d9fd9281e8cef3ea35b7d9ad8… (https://git.linaro.org/toolchain/gcc.git/commit/56d9fd9281e8cef3ea35b7d9ad8… My first question is: is there a straight-forward way (for example, a tag) to find the commit ids of older (4.9) releases? Or is searching the commit messages the best way? Also, is there svn access as well or just git access? (Git access is enough, but svn access would be slightly easier for me.) Also, I has a couple comments on that wiki page: It says “Pre-built versions that run on generic Linux or Windows are available at http://launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain-binaries.”, but it looks like the that Launchpad project is no longer being maintained (no 4.9 and no recent 4.8). Perhaps the wiki page should be updated (and the Launchpad description updated). The wiki page also links to https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/Next/Release/Status (https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/Next/Release/Status) which seems even more out-of-date than the Launchpad binaries; perhaps that link should be updated/removed, too. Thanks. -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782 ##- Please type your reply above this line -## Message-Id:5EV1YF0A_53d20a9134254_35e73f955b4b3338321343_sprut -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782

11 years, 4 months

[ACTIVITY] 16 - 20 June

by Charles Baylis

* Linaro bugzilla #24 - [6/10] * investigating cause of ICE in Linaro 4.9 * PR61411 [1/10] * Committed patches for division (TCWG-???) and Neon address mode (TCWG-430) [1/10] * Admin [1/10] * Holiday [1/10]

11 years, 4 months

VFP in BE mode - undefined instruction vstmia

by Joel (Xi Zhou) Zhou

Hi all, I'm working on booting Linaro LSK 3.10.40 kernel in be8 mode on our Cortex-A9 system. There is an issue related to VFP instruction. It complain "vstmia" is an undefined instruction. The VFP is supported in CPU and CONFIG_VFP and CONFIG_VFPv3 are enabled in kernel config. Are there any patch need to be done for VFP in BE mode? The booting log show as following: call sys_access(/init) Freeing unused kernel memory: 2832K (c0600000 - c08c4000) kernel_init: try to execute '/init' (ramdisk_execute_command) en->run_init_process(/init) init (1): undefined instruction: pc=0000aab8 Code: f00f dff8 2a20 1268 (acec) 108b Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x00000004 The disassembly code show the undefined instruction is "vstmia". armeb-linux-gnueabihf-objdump -D busybox_unstripped > busy.asm 0000aa90 <__sigsetjmp>: ... aab6: 6812 ldr r2, [r2, #0] aab8: ecac 8b10 vstmia ip!, {d8-d15} aabc: f412 7f00 tst.w r2, #512 ; 0x200 The rootfs is busybox 1.22.1 compiled by Linaro BE hard floating toolchain. https://releases.linaro.org/14.04/components/toolchain/binaries/gcc-linaro-… Thanks, Joel

11 years, 4 months

[ACTIVITY] 14 - 18 July 2014

by Omair Javaid

== Progress == * On Holiday from 14th to 17th July 2014. * Travel to Cambridge to attend TCWG Sprint and GNU Tools Cauldron on Friday 18th July. == Plan == * Attend GNU Tools Cauldron 18th to 20th July. * Attend TCWG Sprint 21st to 24th July. * Friday 18th July return back after attending TCWG Sprint and GNU Tools Cauldron in UK.

11 years, 4 months

[ACTIVITY] 7 - 11 July 2014

by Omair Javaid

== Progress == * Testing and Analysis of testsuite failures in arm-linux-gdb [TCWG-509] [6/10] -- Run ARM GDB testsuite on local chromebook, remote chrombook and pandaboards. -- Investigation of failures on arm. * AArch64 GDB handling of functions with empty prologue. [TCWG-504] [1/10] -- Short list aarch64 prologue skipping requirements. * Browsing gdb related upstream discussions and reviewing aarch64 regset rework stuff. [1/10] * Preparation for travel to UK, obtaining medical NOC document for international travel. [2/10] == Plan == * On Holiday from 14th to 17th July 2014. * Travel to Cambridge to attend Sprint and Cauldron.

11 years, 4 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-toolchain