On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 08:27:51AM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 11:33:27AM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
and Philipp can use the `RcuKBox` in this patchset. We also need to impl InPlaceInit for RcuBox, but that can be added later.
So shall we merge my series with Alice's patch, and later we add your patch and other features, or would you prefer to have the additional boxes from your patch from the get-go?
I would like to have it from the get-go mainly because of RcuBox vs RcuKBox naming. Thank you!
Fine by me. Just process-wise: how should we do it?
I could include your patch on top of Alice's. Would be a bit more consistent regarding the git-workflow if we'd squash the two patches, but then you two would have to agree on authorship.
Keeping it as a separate patch is fine by me.
So is squashing ;-) Whichever is easy for you.
Regards, Boqun
Regards, Boqun
All is fine by me, but I wanted to ask instead of just do A or B.
[...]