[Linaro-mm-sig] Re: [PATCH 00/15] tracepoint: Avoid double static_branch evaluation at guarded call sites

On Fri, 13 Mar 2026 10:02:32 -0400 Vineeth Remanan Pillai vineeth@bitbyteword.org wrote:

...

Perhaps: call_trace_foo() ?

call_trace_foo has one collision with the tracepoint sched_update_nr_running and a function call_trace_sched_update_nr_running. I had considered this and later moved to trace_invoke_foo() because of the collision. But I can rename call_trace_sched_update_nr_running to something else if call_trace_foo is the general consensus.

OK, then lets go with: trace_call__foo()

The double underscore should prevent any name collisions.

Does anyone have an objections?

-- Steve