Linaro-mm-sig

linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org

35 participants
8015 discussions

Coffee Grading +256790560642 Arabica Robusta coffee traders USA Italy Germany

by mnothomth＠gmail.com

COFFEE KAWA EXPORTER – From Our Farms to Your Cup Experience the True Taste of Origin Call +256790560642 Email: coffeekawwa(a)gmail.com We specialize in green coffee bean exports, ensuring consistent quality, rich aroma, and sustainable sourcing. Product: The Green Coffee beans (Arabica Coffee) Grade: AA, A, and AB Packaging: Jute Gunny Bags of 60kgs (Net Weight) Quality Description: AA for Screen 17, A for Screen 16 and AB for Screen 15. -This Undergoes grading machines (Buhler and Cimbria), Sorting is by gravity table and colour sorter. Shipment Quantities: 20ft containers Origin: UGANDA Email: coffeekawwa(a)gmail.com PRICES ============================ ROBUSTA COFFEE: •⁠ ⁠Screen 18 organic per ton. •⁠ ⁠Screen 15 organic per ton. •⁠ ⁠Screen 12 organic per ton. ARABICA COFFEE: •⁠ ⁠AA Screen 17 per ton. •⁠ ⁠AB price per ton. DRUGA: per ton: Let your customers experience the difference that comes from freshness, traceability, and passion Available for bulk export worldwide Serious Inquiries Only Phone number: +256790560642 Email: coffeekawwa(a)gmail.com

1 week, 1 day

TRUSTED EXPERTS IN CYBERSECURITY & DIGITAL FORENSICS

by rm0186397＠gmail.com

Ghost Mystery Recovery Hacker is described as a digital investigation and cybersecurity service focused on cryptocurrency fraud investigations, blockchain analysis, digital forensics, and cyber incident support. It states that it helps clients investigate online scams and improve digital security through professional and ethical practices. Contact Information Ghost Mystery Recovery Hacker Website: https://ghostmysteryrecovery.com/ Email: support(a)ghostmysteryrecovery.com WhatsApp: +44 7480 061 765 Customer Support: Assistance is available for general inquiries, cryptocurrency fraud investigations, blockchain analysis, digital forensics, and cybersecurity-related questions. Clients are encouraged to provide detailed information when submitting an inquiry to help the support team assess their case.

1 week, 1 day

TRUSTED EXPERTS IN CYBERSECURITY & DIGITAL FORENSICS

by rm0186397＠gmail.com

1 week, 1 day

TRUSTED EXPERTS IN CYBERSECURITY & DIGITAL FORENSICS

by rm0186397＠gmail.com

1 week, 1 day

TRUSTED EXPERTS IN CYBERSECURITY & DIGITAL FORENSICS

by rm0186397＠gmail.com

1 week, 1 day

TRUSTED EXPERTS IN CYBERSECURITY & DIGITAL FORENSICS

by rm0186397＠gmail.com

1 week, 1 day

TRUSTED EXPERTS IN CYBERSECURITY & DIGITAL FORENSICS

by rm0186397＠gmail.com

1 week, 1 day

Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] rust: sync: Add abstraction for rcu_barrier()

by Gary Guo

On Wed Jul 29, 2026 at 6:18 PM BST, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 11:45:40AM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote: >> rcu_barrier() is a frequently used C function which is always safe to be >> called. > > Just checking... Here "always safe" means only from task level, with BH, > preemption, and interrupts all enabled, correct? > > In contrast, if you do this: > > preempt_disable(); > rcu_barrier(); > preempt_enable(); > > the results won't be safe. This is same for all sleepable functions. In order to avoid having to mark all sleeping function unsafe, we've decided that sleeping from non-preemptable context is "safe", but is a bug regardless. Best, Gary

1 week, 1 day

PO-INV Document

by Sales Team – Pipex Inc

1 week, 1 day

Re: [PATCH v4 09/14] nvme-pci: add SGL support for the dmabuf path

by Christoph Hellwig

On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 12:45:47PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > It was exposed in early version as I was passing a [{dma,len}, ...] > array, but we moved from that. Maybe I should put the minimum > segment size in the map structure, and (possibly over) split using > that for now? Keith had this chunk in his patches: > > + int offset = offset_in_page(bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done); > + > + nsegs = ALIGN(bio->bi_iter.bi_size + offset, PAGE_SIZE) >> > + PAGE_SHIFT; > + if (bio->bi_iter.bi_size > max_bytes) { > + bytes = max_bytes; > + nsegs = (bytes + offset) >> PAGE_SHIFT; > + } else if (nsegs > lim->max_segments) { > + nsegs = lim->max_segments; > + bytes = PAGE_SIZE * nsegs - offset; > + } else { > + *segs = nsegs; > + return NULL; > + } This seems very pessimistic, especially for the case of the registration only having a single segment, which I'd expect to be fairly common due to P2P bar mappings, huge pages or IOMMU coalescing. So at very least we'd want to special case that, but in an idea world the caller would be required to provide a useful nr_segments for the I/O.

1 week, 2 days

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

Linaro-mm-sig