Almighty Cryptocurrency Recovery is a private investigation, asset recovery, and financial regulator. We specialize in instances involving recovery scams, cryptocurrency, fake investment schemes, and ethical hacking. We examine the factors influencing your score and are also experts in credit repair. removing criminal records, school grades, and jobs involving phone and social media hacking.
Every piece of software required to carry out recoveries from beginning to end is available.
The writers and offenders band together to establish a syndicate, so be wary of false reviews and testimonials on the internet.To get started, send an email to our support team at the address below as soon as you can.
almightyrecoverycoin(a)mail.com and whatsapp +53 51 55 6969
Visit website; almightyrecoveryco.wixsite.com/almighty-recovery-co
Stay Safe!
Many of us have f@ll€n for inves tment, pon zi, love, dating, even cryp to sc@m, it's really sad, few months ago I was a vict im of an invest ment sc@m , but today I got my fuπds back to my wall et , unbelievable right? I'll tell you h0w: Firstly, Believe in ghosttrackha ckers these guys are geπuine and geπius, I stumbled upon series of reviews from th€m, after months of l00sing my $20k worth of bitc0iπ thinking they were gone forever I sent them a m@il, €xplaining what happened and if there was any possibility, they said "nothing w€ can't haπdle" I sat back and in 48hrs they ask€d for my addr€ss and they r€c0v€r€d the full funds.
I couldn't believe my eyes, I told them I'll go spr€ad the words to many others who have fall€n vi¢t|m. Goodluck
ghosttrackhackers@ gmail . com
This is the next version of the shmem backed GEM objects series
originally from Asahi, previously posted by Daniel Almeida.
One of the major changes in this patch series is a much better interface
around vmaps, which we achieve by introducing a new set of rust bindings
for iosys_map.
The previous version of the patch series can be found here:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/156093/
This patch series may be applied on top of the
driver-core/driver-core-testing branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/driver-core/driver-core.git…
Changelogs are per-patch
Asahi Lina (2):
rust: helpers: Add bindings/wrappers for dma_resv_lock
rust: drm: gem: shmem: Add DRM shmem helper abstraction
Lyude Paul (5):
rust: drm: Add gem::impl_aref_for_gem_obj!
rust: drm: gem: Add raw_dma_resv() function
rust: gem: Introduce DriverObject::Args
rust: drm: gem: Introduce shmem::SGTable
rust: drm/gem: Add vmap functions to shmem bindings
drivers/gpu/drm/nova/gem.rs | 5 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/tyr/gem.rs | 3 +-
rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h | 3 +
rust/helpers/dma-resv.c | 13 +
rust/helpers/drm.c | 56 +++-
rust/helpers/helpers.c | 1 +
rust/kernel/drm/gem/mod.rs | 79 +++--
rust/kernel/drm/gem/shmem.rs | 529 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
8 files changed, 667 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 rust/helpers/dma-resv.c
create mode 100644 rust/kernel/drm/gem/shmem.rs
--
2.53.0
Hey everyone! I'm thrilled to announce that I have fully rec0vered my l0cked BTC from an inve stment platf0rm even after 3 months it happened. Here's a quick story.
Early this year, I came across an inve stment platf0rm that gave me my profit after the first inve stment , I did the second it was successful and I tried the 3rd this time with a bigger amount of $120,000, when it was time for withdr awal I couldn't, the option was l0cked, After weeks of trying I l0st hope, fast-forward to last week I saw a post about rec0 vering l0cked or st0len fuñ ds, tho I was skeptical but I gave it a try what more could I lose?? In 2 4hrs ghosttrackhackers@gmail . com h€lped me r€trieve my full fuπds (of $120,000) including profit ($40,000). It's back safe in my w@ll€t. I know many have fallen v!ct!m too you can re@ch out to th€m for h€lp they're l€git and €asy to talk to. Goodluck.
✉️: ghosttrackhackers @ gmail . com
On Sun, Mar 8, 2026 at 7:08 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg(a)ziepe.ca> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 08, 2026 at 02:55:27PM +0100, Julian Orth wrote:
> > A user reported memory corruption in the Jay wayland compositor [1]. The
> > corruption started when archlinux enabled
> > CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_SHMEM_HUGE_WITHIN_SIZE in kernel 6.19.5.
> >
> > The compositor uses udmabuf to upload memory from memfds to the GPU.
> > When running an affected kernel, the following warnings are logged:
> >
> > a - addrs >= max_entries
> > WARNING: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c:1089 at drm_prime_sg_to_dma_addr_array+0x86/0xc0, CPU#31: jay/1864
> > [...]
> > Call Trace:
> > <TASK>
> > amdgpu_bo_move+0x188/0x800 [amdgpu 3b451640234948027c09e9b39e6520bc7e5471cf]
> >
> > Disabling the use of huge pages at runtime via
> > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/shmem_enabled fixes the issue.
> >
> > udmabuf allocates a scatterlist with buffer_size/PAGE_SIZE entries. Each
> > entry has a length of PAGE_SIZE. With huge pages disabled, it appears
> > that sg->offset is always 0. With huge pages enabled, sg->offset is
> > incremented by PAGE_SIZE until the end of the huge page.
>
> This was broken by 0c8b91ef5100 ("udmabuf: add back support for
> mapping hugetlb pages") which switched from a working
> sg_alloc_table_from_pages() to a messed up sg_set_pages loop:
>
> + for_each_sg(sg->sgl, sgl, ubuf->pagecount, i)
> + sg_set_page(sgl, ubuf->pages[i], PAGE_SIZE, ubuf->offsets[i]);
> [..]
> + ubuf->offsets[*pgbuf] = subpgoff << PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> Which is just the wrong way to use the scatterlist API.
>
> This was later changed to sg_set_folio() which I'm also suspecting has
> a bug, it should be setting page_link to the proper tail page because
> as you observe page_offset must fall within 0 to PAGE_SIZE-1 to make
> the iterator work.
>
> I think the whole design here in udmabuf makes very little sense. It
> starts out with an actual list of folios then expands them to a per-4K
> double array of folio/offset. This is nonsensical, if it wants to
> build a way to direct index the mapping for mmap it should just build
> itself a page * array like the code used to do and continue to use
> sg_alloc_table_from_pages() which builds properly formed scatterlists.
>
> This would save memory, use the APIs properly and build a correct and
> optimized scatterlist to boot. It uses vmf_insert_pfn() and
> vm_map_ram() anyhow so it doesn't even use a folio :\
>
> Here, a few mins of AI shows what I think udmabuf should look like. If
> you wish to persue this please add my signed-off-by and handle testing
> it and getting it merged. I reviewed it enough to see it was showing
> what I wanted.
I don't know enough about folios or udmabuf to efficiently work on this.
If offset is supposed to be in [0, PAGE_SIZE-1], then my patch is
incorrect and it's probably better if some of the udmabuf maintainers
take a look at this. I've added them to CC.
>
> Jason
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c
> index 94b8ecb892bb17..5d687860445137 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c
> @@ -26,10 +26,10 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(size_limit_mb, "Max size of a dmabuf, in megabytes. Default is
>
> struct udmabuf {
> pgoff_t pagecount;
> - struct folio **folios;
> + struct page **pages;
>
> /**
> - * Unlike folios, pinned_folios is only used for unpin.
> + * Unlike pages, pinned_folios is only used for unpin.
> * So, nr_pinned is not the same to pagecount, the pinned_folios
> * only set each folio which already pinned when udmabuf_create.
> * Note that, since a folio may be pinned multiple times, each folio
> @@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ struct udmabuf {
>
> struct sg_table *sg;
> struct miscdevice *device;
> - pgoff_t *offsets;
> };
>
> static vm_fault_t udmabuf_vm_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> @@ -55,8 +54,7 @@ static vm_fault_t udmabuf_vm_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> if (pgoff >= ubuf->pagecount)
> return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
>
> - pfn = folio_pfn(ubuf->folios[pgoff]);
> - pfn += ubuf->offsets[pgoff] >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + pfn = page_to_pfn(ubuf->pages[pgoff]);
>
> ret = vmf_insert_pfn(vma, vmf->address, pfn);
> if (ret & VM_FAULT_ERROR)
> @@ -73,8 +71,7 @@ static vm_fault_t udmabuf_vm_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> if (WARN_ON(pgoff >= ubuf->pagecount))
> break;
>
> - pfn = folio_pfn(ubuf->folios[pgoff]);
> - pfn += ubuf->offsets[pgoff] >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + pfn = page_to_pfn(ubuf->pages[pgoff]);
>
> /**
> * If the below vmf_insert_pfn() fails, we do not return an
> @@ -109,22 +106,11 @@ static int mmap_udmabuf(struct dma_buf *buf, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> static int vmap_udmabuf(struct dma_buf *buf, struct iosys_map *map)
> {
> struct udmabuf *ubuf = buf->priv;
> - struct page **pages;
> void *vaddr;
> - pgoff_t pg;
>
> dma_resv_assert_held(buf->resv);
>
> - pages = kvmalloc_objs(*pages, ubuf->pagecount);
> - if (!pages)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - for (pg = 0; pg < ubuf->pagecount; pg++)
> - pages[pg] = folio_page(ubuf->folios[pg],
> - ubuf->offsets[pg] >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> -
> - vaddr = vm_map_ram(pages, ubuf->pagecount, -1);
> - kvfree(pages);
> + vaddr = vm_map_ram(ubuf->pages, ubuf->pagecount, -1);
> if (!vaddr)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> @@ -146,22 +132,18 @@ static struct sg_table *get_sg_table(struct device *dev, struct dma_buf *buf,
> {
> struct udmabuf *ubuf = buf->priv;
> struct sg_table *sg;
> - struct scatterlist *sgl;
> - unsigned int i = 0;
> int ret;
>
> sg = kzalloc_obj(*sg);
> if (!sg)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> - ret = sg_alloc_table(sg, ubuf->pagecount, GFP_KERNEL);
> + ret = sg_alloc_table_from_pages(sg, ubuf->pages, ubuf->pagecount, 0,
> + ubuf->pagecount << PAGE_SHIFT,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto err_alloc;
>
> - for_each_sg(sg->sgl, sgl, ubuf->pagecount, i)
> - sg_set_folio(sgl, ubuf->folios[i], PAGE_SIZE,
> - ubuf->offsets[i]);
> -
> ret = dma_map_sgtable(dev, sg, direction, 0);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto err_map;
> @@ -207,12 +189,8 @@ static void unpin_all_folios(struct udmabuf *ubuf)
>
> static __always_inline int init_udmabuf(struct udmabuf *ubuf, pgoff_t pgcnt)
> {
> - ubuf->folios = kvmalloc_objs(*ubuf->folios, pgcnt);
> - if (!ubuf->folios)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - ubuf->offsets = kvzalloc_objs(*ubuf->offsets, pgcnt);
> - if (!ubuf->offsets)
> + ubuf->pages = kvmalloc_objs(*ubuf->pages, pgcnt);
> + if (!ubuf->pages)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> ubuf->pinned_folios = kvmalloc_objs(*ubuf->pinned_folios, pgcnt);
> @@ -225,8 +203,7 @@ static __always_inline int init_udmabuf(struct udmabuf *ubuf, pgoff_t pgcnt)
> static __always_inline void deinit_udmabuf(struct udmabuf *ubuf)
> {
> unpin_all_folios(ubuf);
> - kvfree(ubuf->offsets);
> - kvfree(ubuf->folios);
> + kvfree(ubuf->pages);
> }
>
> static void release_udmabuf(struct dma_buf *buf)
> @@ -344,8 +321,8 @@ static long udmabuf_pin_folios(struct udmabuf *ubuf, struct file *memfd,
> ubuf->pinned_folios[nr_pinned++] = folios[cur_folio];
>
> for (; subpgoff < fsize; subpgoff += PAGE_SIZE) {
> - ubuf->folios[upgcnt] = folios[cur_folio];
> - ubuf->offsets[upgcnt] = subpgoff;
> + ubuf->pages[upgcnt] = folio_page(folios[cur_folio],
> + subpgoff >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> ++upgcnt;
>
> if (++cur_pgcnt >= pgcnt)
>
Hey everyone! I'm thrilled to announce that I have fully rec0vered my l0cked BTC from an inve stment platf0rm even after 3 months it happened. Here's a quick story.
Early this year, I came across an inve stment platf0rm that gave me my profit after the first inve stment , I did the second it was successful and I tried the 3rd this time with a bigger amount of $120,000, when it was time for withdr awal I couldn't, the option was l0cked, After weeks of trying I l0st hope, fast-forward to last week I saw a post about rec0 vering l0cked or st0len fuñ ds, tho I was skeptical but I gave it a try what more could I lose?? In 2 4hrs ghosttrackhackers@gmail . com h€lped me r€trieve my full fuπds (of $120,000) including profit ($40,000). It's back safe in my w@ll€t. I know many have fallen v!ct!m too you can re@ch out to th€m for h€lp they're l€git and €asy to talk to. Goodluck.
✉️: ghosttrackhackers @ gmail . com
Use clear_pages() and clear_highpage() properly in the
DMA heap allocator.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linusw(a)kernel.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- Added a second patch to use the clear_highpage() helper.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260304-cma-heap-clear-pages-v1-1-6ff59da716d3@k…
---
Linus Walleij (2):
dma-buf: heaps: Clear CMA pages with clear_pages()
dma-buf: heaps: Clear CMA highages using helper
drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 6de23f81a5e08be8fbf5e8d7e9febc72a5b5f27f
change-id: 20260303-cma-heap-clear-pages-540f3ac9f734
Best regards,
--
Linus Walleij <linusw(a)kernel.org>
The digital asset space in March 2026 continues to grow rapidly, but so do the risks. Phishing attacks, fake investment platforms, pig-butchering schemes, wallet exploits, rug pulls, and address-poisoning fraud result in billions in losses annually. Once cryptocurrency leaves a victim's control—whether through deception, malware, or access issues—blockchain's irreversible and pseudonymous design offers no central authority for reversal or reset. Recovery becomes a matter of investigation, forensic tracing, evidence gathering, and coordinated action rather than simple reversal.
Professional digital assets recovery and investigation services focus on two primary areas: (1) restoring access to legitimately owned but locked wallets (forgotten passwords, damaged hardware, corrupted files), and (2) tracing stolen funds to map movement, identify laundering patterns, and locate potential intervention points such as regulated centralized exchanges for asset freezes or law enforcement seizures. These services rely on public blockchain data—transaction hashes (TXIDs), addresses, amounts, timestamps—and advanced analytics to reconstruct flows that basic explorers cannot follow.
Legitimate providers never guarantee full recovery; blockchain immutability prevents that. Success is partial at best and depends on early detection, evidence quality, laundering complexity, and cooperation from exchanges or authorities. The industry is unregulated, creating a high risk of secondary scams: fraudsters contact victims unsolicited, demand large upfront cryptocurrency payments, promise guaranteed results, and disappear. Official warnings from the FBI, FTC, and blockchain analytics firms consistently identify these as advance-fee fraud.
Trusted services share common traits:
Transparent methodology explained on professional websites
Free or low-cost initial consultations to review evidence (TXIDs, addresses, communications)
No requests for private keys, seed phrases, or wallet access upfront
Honest feasibility assessments without absolute guarantees
Focus on forensic reports for exchange compliance submissions, regulatory filings, or law enforcement coordination (FBI IC3, local cyber units)
Emphasis on prevention education (hardware wallets, address verification, secure backups, monitoring)
Cryptera Chain Signals (CCS) is a firm that aligns with these standards of professional digital assets recovery and investigation. With 28 years of experience in digital forensics—long before cryptocurrencies became mainstream—CCS specializes in multi-layer blockchain attribution. Their process reconstructs transaction paths through complex obfuscation methods (mixers, cross-chain bridges, DEX swaps, privacy protocols, flash-loan laundering), clusters addresses using behavioral heuristics (co-spending patterns, change address reuse, timing/amount correlations), identifies high-confidence endpoints on KYC/AML-compliant exchanges, and produces detailed forensic reports suitable for freeze requests or official submissions. They prioritize secure intake, transparency—no large upfront fees without case evaluation—and realistic guidance, helping victims understand fund movements and viable next steps.
Other established names in the space include institutional analytics providers like Chainalysis, TRM Labs, Elliptic, and CipherTrace, which primarily serve exchanges, regulators, and law enforcement for large-scale tracing and seizures. Consumer-facing firms such as KeychainX (often for password/seed recovery), Wallet Recovery Services, Crypto Asset Recovery, and Puran Crypto Recovery appear in forums and testimonials for access restoration or scam tracing. Many mentions, however, originate from self-published articles or sponsored content, so independent verification is essential.
To identify legitimate services:
Transparency — Clear website with methodology details, verifiable contact information.
No red flags — Avoid upfront crypto demands, guarantees, unsolicited outreach, pressure tactics.
Evidence focus — Emphasis on forensic reports for freezes, official submissions, or legal use.
Independent checks — Verify domain age (whois), search scam warnings, cross-reference neutral reviews.
First action — Report to authorities (FBI IC3, FTC, local police) before engaging any service—official reports create records and may aid broader actions.
Cryptera Chain Signals (CCS) incorporates these qualities: confidential consultations, advanced multi-layer tracing, detailed forensic reporting, honest assessments, and a focus on client education and protection. Their experience supports victims in gaining clarity on access issues or stolen-fund movements and pursuing realistic options when leads exist.
While no service guarantees recovery—due to strong encryption, complete seed loss, heavy laundering, dispersal, or jurisdictional limits—professional digital assets investigation offers the clearest path to evidence and intervention. Early action (secure remaining assets, document evidence, report officially) and choosing vetted providers remain essential.
For more information on professional blockchain forensics, transaction tracing methods, and realistic guidance for digital asset recovery, visit https://www.crypterachainsignals.com/ or email info(a)crypterachainsignals.com.
In 2026, trusted digital assets recovery and investigation require caution, technical depth, and integrity. Firms like Cryptera Chain Signals (CCS) represent the kind of professional, evidence-based approach that prioritizes transparency and realistic outcomes in a high-risk and often exploitative field.
Cryptocurrency scams continue to evolve rapidly in March 2026, with losses estimated in the tens of billions annually according to reports from firms like Chainalysis and TRM Labs. Schemes such as phishing, fake investment platforms, pig-butchering operations, rug pulls, and AI-enhanced impersonation fraud exploit blockchain's pseudonymity and irreversibility, leaving victims searching for ways to trace stolen funds and pursue accountability. Fraud investigation services in this space focus on blockchain forensics—analyzing public ledger data to reconstruct transaction flows, cluster addresses under common control, identify laundering techniques, and locate potential intervention points like regulated exchanges for asset freezes or law enforcement seizures.
The field blends technical expertise with investigative rigor, but it's largely unregulated, creating a high risk of secondary scams. Many "recovery" outfits contact victims unsolicited, demand large upfront cryptocurrency payments, and promise guaranteed results—classic advance-fee fraud. Legitimate services prioritize transparency, evidence-based analysis, realistic assessments, and no premature requests for private keys or seed phrases.
Professional blockchain forensics firms use public transaction data (addresses, amounts, timestamps, TXIDs) and apply heuristics like co-spending patterns, change address reuse, timing/amount correlations, and behavioral fingerprints to cluster addresses and map complex paths. They track through obfuscation methods—mixers/tumblers, cross-chain bridges, decentralized exchanges, privacy protocols, flash-loan laundering—and produce detailed forensic reports for exchange compliance submissions, regulatory filings, or authorities (e.g., FBI IC3, local cybercrime units). Partial recoveries occur in cases where funds reach KYC/AML-compliant platforms quickly, or broader seizures disrupt scam networks.
Cryptera Chain Signals (CCS) is a firm that aligns with the traits of credible fraud investigation services. With 28 years of digital investigation experience, CCS specializes in multi-layer blockchain attribution—reconstructing fund flows through sophisticated laundering paths that standard tools cannot follow. Their process includes secure intake (no keys required upfront), transaction graphing, address clustering, endpoint identification (especially regulated exchanges), and production of evidence-grade reports suitable for freeze requests or law enforcement coordination. They emphasize honest feasibility evaluations—no large upfront fees without case review, no unrealistic guarantees—and include prevention education to help victims avoid recurrence.
Other names appear in 2026 discussions and reports. Institutional-grade providers like Chainalysis, TRM Labs, Elliptic, and CipherTrace offer advanced analytics primarily to exchanges, regulators, and law enforcement for large-scale investigations and seizures (e.g., recent actions against Southeast Asian scam networks or sanctions evasion). Firms like StoneTurn or Crystal Intelligence provide targeted crypto investigations for private clients and legal teams, focusing on asset tracing and recovery support. Consumer-facing services such as Puran Crypto Recovery, TechY Force Cyber Retrieval, or ChainX Hacker Solutions are mentioned in online lists and testimonials, often highlighting scam-specific tracing or compliance coordination. However, many such mentions come from self-published articles, sponsored content, or forums with limited independent verification—caution is advised, as promotional bias is common.
To identify legitimate fraud investigation services:
Transparency — Clear methodology on a professional website, verifiable contact details, no encrypted-chat-only operations.
No red flags — Avoid upfront crypto demands, guarantees, unsolicited outreach, or pressure tactics.
Evidence focus — Emphasis on forensic reports for freezes, official submissions, or legal use.
Independent checks — Verify domain age (whois), search for scam warnings, cross-reference neutral reviews.
First step — Report to authorities (FBI IC3, FTC, local cyber units) to create records and aid potential actions.
Cryptera Chain Signals (CCS) incorporates these qualities: confidential consultations, advanced multi-layer tracing, detailed reporting, and a client-centered focus that avoids common pitfalls. Their experience helps victims gain clarity on scam mechanics and pursue realistic options when leads exist.
While no service guarantees recovery—due to laundering complexity, privacy tools, dispersal, or jurisdictional limits—professional blockchain investigation offers the clearest path to evidence and intervention. Early reporting, strong documentation, and vetted forensics remain key to any progress.
For more on blockchain fraud investigation, forensic tracing methods, and realistic guidance for scam victims, visit https://www.crypterachainsignals.com/ or email info(a)crypterachainsignals.com.
In 2026, trusted fraud investigation for cryptocurrency scams requires caution, technical depth, and integrity. Services like Cryptera Chain Signals (CCS) represent the kind of professional, evidence-based approach that prioritizes transparency and realistic outcomes in a high-risk and often exploitative field.