Linaro-mm-sig

linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org

6 participants
3320 discussions

[PATCH] staging: android: ion: Zero CMA allocated memory

by Liam Mark

Since the CMA API is now used directly the allocated memory is no longer automatically zeroed. Explicitly zero CMA allocated memory to ensure that no data is exposed to userspace. Change-Id: I08e143707a0d31610821a7f16826c262bf3c1999 Signed-off-by: Liam Mark <lmark(a)codeaurora.org> --- drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_cma_heap.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_cma_heap.c b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_cma_heap.c index 86196ff..91a9878 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_cma_heap.c +++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_cma_heap.c @@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ static int ion_cma_allocate(struct ion_heap *heap, struct ion_buffer *buffer, if (!pages) return -ENOMEM; + memset(page_address(pages), 0, size); + table = kmalloc(sizeof(*table), GFP_KERNEL); if (!table) goto err; -- 1.8.5.2 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

8 years

[PATCH 1/3] dma-buf: make returning the exclusive fence optional

by Christian König

Change reservation_object_get_fences_rcu to make the exclusive fence pointer optional. If not specified the exclusive fence is put into the fence array as well. This is helpful for a couple of cases where we need all fences in a single array. Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com> --- drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c index b759a569b7b8..461afa9febd4 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c @@ -374,8 +374,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(reservation_object_copy_fences); * @pshared: the array of shared fence ptrs returned (array is krealloc'd to * the required size, and must be freed by caller) * - * RETURNS - * Zero or -errno + * Retrieve all fences from the reservation object. If the pointer for the + * exclusive fence is not specified the fence is put into the array of the + * shared fences as well. Returns either zero or -ENOMEM. */ int reservation_object_get_fences_rcu(struct reservation_object *obj, struct dma_fence **pfence_excl, @@ -389,8 +390,8 @@ int reservation_object_get_fences_rcu(struct reservation_object *obj, do { struct reservation_object_list *fobj; - unsigned seq; - unsigned int i; + unsigned int i, seq; + size_t sz = 0; shared_count = i = 0; @@ -402,9 +403,14 @@ int reservation_object_get_fences_rcu(struct reservation_object *obj, goto unlock; fobj = rcu_dereference(obj->fence); - if (fobj) { + if (fobj) + sz += sizeof(*shared) * fobj->shared_max; + + if (!pfence_excl && fence_excl) + sz += sizeof(*shared); + + if (sz) { struct dma_fence **nshared; - size_t sz = sizeof(*shared) * fobj->shared_max; nshared = krealloc(shared, sz, GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN); @@ -420,13 +426,19 @@ int reservation_object_get_fences_rcu(struct reservation_object *obj, break; } shared = nshared; - shared_count = fobj->shared_count; - + shared_count = fobj ? fobj->shared_count : 0; for (i = 0; i < shared_count; ++i) { shared[i] = rcu_dereference(fobj->shared[i]); if (!dma_fence_get_rcu(shared[i])) break; } + + if (!pfence_excl && fence_excl) { + shared[i] = fence_excl; + fence_excl = NULL; + ++i; + ++shared_count; + } } if (i != shared_count || read_seqcount_retry(&obj->seq, seq)) { @@ -448,7 +460,8 @@ int reservation_object_get_fences_rcu(struct reservation_object *obj, *pshared_count = shared_count; *pshared = shared; - *pfence_excl = fence_excl; + if (pfence_excl) + *pfence_excl = fence_excl; return ret; } -- 2.14.1

8 years

[Patch v2 1/2] dma-buf: add some lockdep asserts to the reservation object implementation

by Lucas Stach

This adds lockdep asserts to the reservation functions which state in their documentation that obj->lock must be held. Allows builds with PROVE_LOCKING enabled to check that the locking requirements are met. Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach(a)pengutronix.de> --- v2: remove erroneous check from reservation_object_get_excl --- drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c index b44d9d7db347..accd398e2ea6 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c @@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ int reservation_object_reserve_shared(struct reservation_object *obj) struct reservation_object_list *fobj, *old; u32 max; + reservation_object_assert_held(obj); + old = reservation_object_get_list(obj); if (old && old->shared_max) { @@ -211,6 +213,8 @@ void reservation_object_add_shared_fence(struct reservation_object *obj, { struct reservation_object_list *old, *fobj = obj->staged; + reservation_object_assert_held(obj); + old = reservation_object_get_list(obj); obj->staged = NULL; @@ -236,6 +240,8 @@ void reservation_object_add_excl_fence(struct reservation_object *obj, struct reservation_object_list *old; u32 i = 0; + reservation_object_assert_held(obj); + old = reservation_object_get_list(obj); if (old) i = old->shared_count; @@ -276,6 +282,8 @@ int reservation_object_copy_fences(struct reservation_object *dst, size_t size; unsigned i; + reservation_object_assert_held(dst); + rcu_read_lock(); src_list = rcu_dereference(src->fence); -- 2.11.0

8 years

[PATCH] dma-buf: add some lockdep asserts to the reservation object implementation

by Lucas Stach

This adds lockdep asserts to the reservation functions which state in their documentation that obj->lock must be held. Allows builds with PROVE_LOCKING enabled to check that the locking requirements are met. Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach(a)pengutronix.de> --- drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c | 8 ++++++++ include/linux/reservation.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c index b44d9d7db347..accd398e2ea6 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c @@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ int reservation_object_reserve_shared(struct reservation_object *obj) struct reservation_object_list *fobj, *old; u32 max; + reservation_object_assert_held(obj); + old = reservation_object_get_list(obj); if (old && old->shared_max) { @@ -211,6 +213,8 @@ void reservation_object_add_shared_fence(struct reservation_object *obj, { struct reservation_object_list *old, *fobj = obj->staged; + reservation_object_assert_held(obj); + old = reservation_object_get_list(obj); obj->staged = NULL; @@ -236,6 +240,8 @@ void reservation_object_add_excl_fence(struct reservation_object *obj, struct reservation_object_list *old; u32 i = 0; + reservation_object_assert_held(obj); + old = reservation_object_get_list(obj); if (old) i = old->shared_count; @@ -276,6 +282,8 @@ int reservation_object_copy_fences(struct reservation_object *dst, size_t size; unsigned i; + reservation_object_assert_held(dst); + rcu_read_lock(); src_list = rcu_dereference(src->fence); diff --git a/include/linux/reservation.h b/include/linux/reservation.h index 21fc84d82d41..55e7318800fd 100644 --- a/include/linux/reservation.h +++ b/include/linux/reservation.h @@ -212,6 +212,8 @@ reservation_object_unlock(struct reservation_object *obj) static inline struct dma_fence * reservation_object_get_excl(struct reservation_object *obj) { + reservation_object_assert_held(obj); + return rcu_dereference_protected(obj->fence_excl, reservation_object_held(obj)); } -- 2.11.0

8 years

[PATCH] dma-buf: make returning the exclusive fence optional

by Christian König

8 years

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH] staging: android: ion: Fix dma direction for dma_sync_sg_for_cpu/device

by Laura Abbott

On 12/15/2017 12:59 PM, Sushmita Susheelendra wrote: > Use the direction argument passed into begin_cpu_access > and end_cpu_access when calling the dma_sync_sg_for_cpu/device. > The actual cache primitive called depends on the direction > passed in. > Acked-by: Laura Abbott <labbott(a)redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Sushmita Susheelendra <ssusheel(a)codeaurora.org> > --- > drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c > index a7d9b0e..f480885 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c > @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ static int ion_dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, > mutex_lock(&buffer->lock); > list_for_each_entry(a, &buffer->attachments, list) { > dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(a->dev, a->table->sgl, a->table->nents, > - DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); > + direction); > } > mutex_unlock(&buffer->lock); > > @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static int ion_dma_buf_end_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, > mutex_lock(&buffer->lock); > list_for_each_entry(a, &buffer->attachments, list) { > dma_sync_sg_for_device(a->dev, a->table->sgl, a->table->nents, > - DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); > + direction); > } > mutex_unlock(&buffer->lock); > >

8 years, 1 month

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 0/4] Backported amdgpu ttm deadlock fixes for 4.14

by Christian König

Am 01.12.2017 um 01:23 schrieb Lyude Paul: > I haven't gone to see where it started, but as of late a good number of > pretty nasty deadlock issues have appeared with the kernel. Easy > reproduction recipe on a laptop with i915/amdgpu prime with lockdep enabled: > > DRI_PRIME=1 glxinfo Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com> Thanks for taking care of this, Christian. > > Additionally, some more race conditions exist that I've managed to > trigger with piglit and lockdep enabled after applying these patches: > > ============================= > WARNING: suspicious RCU usage > 4.14.3Lyude-Test+ #2 Not tainted > ----------------------------- > ./include/linux/reservation.h:216 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage! > > other info that might help us debug this: > > rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 > 1 lock held by ext_image_dma_b/27451: > #0: (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa034f2ff>] ttm_bo_unref+0x9f/0x3c0 [ttm] > > stack backtrace: > CPU: 0 PID: 27451 Comm: ext_image_dma_b Not tainted 4.14.3Lyude-Test+ #2 > Hardware name: HP HP ZBook 15 G4/8275, BIOS P70 Ver. 01.02 06/09/2017 > Call Trace: > dump_stack+0x8e/0xce > lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xc5/0x100 > reservation_object_copy_fences+0x292/0x2b0 > ? ttm_bo_unref+0x9f/0x3c0 [ttm] > ttm_bo_unref+0xbd/0x3c0 [ttm] > amdgpu_bo_unref+0x2a/0x50 [amdgpu] > amdgpu_gem_object_free+0x4b/0x50 [amdgpu] > drm_gem_object_free+0x1f/0x40 [drm] > drm_gem_object_put_unlocked+0x40/0xb0 [drm] > drm_gem_object_handle_put_unlocked+0x6c/0xb0 [drm] > drm_gem_object_release_handle+0x51/0x90 [drm] > drm_gem_handle_delete+0x5e/0x90 [drm] > ? drm_gem_handle_create+0x40/0x40 [drm] > drm_gem_close_ioctl+0x20/0x30 [drm] > drm_ioctl_kernel+0x5d/0xb0 [drm] > drm_ioctl+0x2f7/0x3b0 [drm] > ? drm_gem_handle_create+0x40/0x40 [drm] > ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf4/0x190 > ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 > amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x4f/0x90 [amdgpu] > do_vfs_ioctl+0x93/0x670 > ? __fget+0x108/0x1f0 > SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90 > entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc2 > > I've also added the relevant fixes for the issue mentioned above. > > Christian König (3): > drm/ttm: fix ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_or_queue once more > dma-buf: make reservation_object_copy_fences rcu save > drm/amdgpu: reserve root PD while releasing it > > Michel Dänzer (1): > drm/ttm: Always and only destroy bo->ttm_resv in ttm_bo_release_list > > drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 13 ++++++-- > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 43 +++++++++++++------------- > 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.14.3 > > _______________________________________________ > amd-gfx mailing list > amd-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

8 years, 2 months

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH] dma-buf: Fix ifnullfree.cocci warnings

by Sumit Semwal

Hello Vasyl, On 22 November 2017 at 20:52, Vasyl Gomonovych <gomonovych(a)gmail.com> wrote: > NULL check before some freeing functions is not needed. > drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c:1183:2-26: WARNING: NULL check before freeing debugfs_remove_recursive > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/free/ifnullfree.cocci Thank you for your patch; applied to drm-misc-next. > > Signed-off-by: Vasyl Gomonovych <gomonovych(a)gmail.com> > --- > drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c > index 4a038dcf5361..048827b06c03 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c > @@ -1179,8 +1179,7 @@ static int dma_buf_init_debugfs(void) > > static void dma_buf_uninit_debugfs(void) > { > - if (dma_buf_debugfs_dir) > - debugfs_remove_recursive(dma_buf_debugfs_dir); > + debugfs_remove_recursive(dma_buf_debugfs_dir); > } > #else > static inline int dma_buf_init_debugfs(void) > -- > 1.9.1 > -- Thanks and regards, Sumit Semwal Linaro Mobile Group - Kernel Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

8 years, 2 months

[PATCH] reservation: don't wait when timeout=0

by Rob Clark

If we are testing if a reservation object's fences have been signaled with timeout=0 (non-blocking), we need to pass 0 for timeout to dma_fence_wait_timeout(). Plus bonus spelling correction. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark(a)gmail.com> --- drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c index dec3a815455d..71f51140a9ad 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c @@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(reservation_object_get_fences_rcu); * * RETURNS * Returns -ERESTARTSYS if interrupted, 0 if the wait timed out, or - * greater than zer on success. + * greater than zero on success. */ long reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(struct reservation_object *obj, bool wait_all, bool intr, @@ -483,7 +483,14 @@ long reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(struct reservation_object *obj, goto retry; } - ret = dma_fence_wait_timeout(fence, intr, ret); + /* + * Note that dma_fence_wait_timeout() will return 1 if + * the fence is already signaled, so in the wait_all + * case when we go through the retry loop again, ret + * will be greater than 0 and we don't want this to + * cause _wait_timeout() to block + */ + ret = dma_fence_wait_timeout(fence, intr, timeout ? ret : 0); dma_fence_put(fence); if (ret > 0 && wait_all && (i + 1 < shared_count)) goto retry; -- 2.13.6

8 years, 2 months

[PATCH 0/4] dma-buf: Silence dma_fence __rcu sparse warnings

by Ville Syrjala

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala(a)linux.intel.com> When building drm+i915 I get around 150 lines of sparse noise from dma_fence __rcu warnings. This series eliminates all of that. The first two patches were already posted by Chris, but there wasn't any real reaction, so I figured I'd repost with a wider Cc list. As for the other two patches, I'm no expert on dma_fence and I didn't spend a lot of time looking at it so I can't be sure I annotated all the accesses correctly. But I figured someone will scream at me if I got it wrong ;) Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied(a)redhat.com> Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason(a)jlekstrand.net> Cc: linaro-mm-sig(a)lists.linaro.org Cc: linux-media(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher(a)amd.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal(a)linaro.org> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> Chris Wilson (2): drm/syncobj: Mark up the fence as an RCU protected pointer dma-buf/fence: Sparse wants __rcu on the object itself Ville Syrjälä (2): drm/syncobj: Use proper methods for accessing rcu protected pointers dma-buf: Use rcu_assign_pointer() to set rcu protected pointers drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c | 11 +++++++---- include/drm/drm_syncobj.h | 2 +- include/linux/dma-fence.h | 2 +- 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- 2.13.6

8 years, 2 months

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

Linaro-mm-sig