CoreSight

coresight@lists.linaro.org

5 participants
2627 discussions

[issue] coresight: Device tree dependency cycle warnings with bidirectional port references

by 梁镇

Hi CoreSight maintainers, I'm working on adding CoreSight support for RISC-V platform and encountering dependency cycle warnings during boot when defining the device tree topology with bidirectional port references. ## Problem Description When I define the CoreSight topology in device tree with remote-endpoint properties in both out-ports and in-ports (as shown in some examples), the kernel reports dependency cycle warnings: ... [ 2.092243] /soc/funnel@d9042000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc/etf@d9043000 [ 2.099843] /soc/funnel@d9042000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc/etf@d9043000 [ 2.107359] /soc/etf@d9043000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc/funnel@d9042000 [ 2.114899] /soc/etf@d9043000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc/etr@d9044000 [ 2.122234] /soc/etf@d9043000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc/etr@d9044000 [ 2.129492] /soc/etr@d9044000: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /soc/etf@d9043000 ## Current Device Tree Structure encoder0: encoder@d9002000 { compatible = "riscv,trace-encoder"; reg = <0x0 0xd9002000 0x0 0x1000>; cpus = <&cpu_0>; out-ports { port { cluster0_encoder0_out_port: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&cluster0_bridge0_in_port>; }; }; }; }; bridge0: bridge@d9003000 { compatible = "riscv,trace-atbbridge"; reg = <0x0 0xd9003000 0x0 0x1000>; cpus = <&cpu_0>; out-ports { port { cluster0_bridge0_out_port: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&cluster0_funnel_in_port0>; }; }; }; in-ports { port { cluster0_bridge0_in_port: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&cluster0_encoder0_out_port>; }; }; }; }; ................. cluster0_funnel: funnel@d9000000 { compatible = "riscv,trace-funnel"; reg = <0x0 0xd9000000 0x0 0x1000>; cpus = <&cpu_0>, <&cpu_1>, <&cpu_2>, <&cpu_3>; out-ports { port { cluster0_funnel_out_port: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&main_funnel_in_port0>; }; }; }; in-ports { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; port@0 { reg = <0>; cluster0_funnel_in_port0: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&cluster0_bridge0_out_port>; }; }; port@1 { reg = <1>; cluster0_funnel_in_port1: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&cluster0_bridge1_out_port>; }; }; port@2 { reg = <2>; cluster0_funnel_in_port2: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&cluster0_bridge2_out_port>; }; }; port@3 { reg = <3>; cluster0_funnel_in_port3: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&cluster0_bridge3_out_port>; }; }; }; }; main_funnel: funnel@d9042000 { compatible = "arm,coresight-dynamic-funnel", "arm,primecell"; reg = <0x0 0xd9042000 0x0 0x1000>; clocks = <&dummy_clk>; clock-names = "apb_pclk"; out-ports { port { main_funnel_out_port: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&etf_in_port>; }; }; }; in-ports { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; port@0 { reg = <0>; main_funnel_in_port0: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&cluster0_funnel_out_port>; }; }; port@1 { reg = <1>; main_funnel_in_port1: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&cluster1_funnel_out_port>; }; }; port@2 { reg = <2>; main_funnel_in_port2: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&cluster2_funnel_out_port>; }; }; port@3 { reg = <3>; main_funnel_in_port3: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&cluster3_funnel_out_port>; }; }; }; }; etf: etf@d9043000 { compatible = "arm,coresight-tmc", "arm,primecell"; reg = <0x0 0xd9043000 0x0 0x1000>; clocks = <&dummy_clk>; clock-names = "apb_pclk"; out-ports { port { etf_out_port: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&etr_in_port>; }; }; }; in-ports { port { etf_in_port: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&main_funnel_out_port>; }; }; }; }; etr: etr@d9044000 { compatible = "arm,coresight-tmc", "arm,primecell"; reg = <0x0 0xd9044000 0x0 0x1000>; clocks = <&dummy_clk>; clock-names = "apb_pclk"; arm,scatter-gather; in-ports { port { etr_in_port: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&etf_out_port>; }; }; }; }; ## Questions The kernel's fw_devlink mechanism detects and "fixes" these cycles, but can I avoid them in the device tree definition? The system works correctly despite the warnings, but I'd like to understand the proper way to define the topology to avoid these messages. Thank you for your guidance! liangzhen(a)linux.spacemit.com

3 days, 4 hours

[PATCH v3 0/8] coresight: Fix device registration and unregistration

by Leo Yan

This series is to fix and refactor CoreSight device registration and unregistration, it can be divided into three small parts: Patches 01-03: Three fixes for memory leak, device reference and mutex protection. Patches 04-05: Move connection cleanup operations into coresight_remove_conns(). Patches 06-08: Refactor error handling in coresight_register(). This series is verified on Juno board with kmemleak detector. For kmemleak verifying: echo clear > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak insmod coresight modules rmmod coresight modules echo scan > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak The result shows no memory leak during a cycle of device registration and unregistration. --- Changes in v3: - Updated patch 01 to use coesight core layer for device index list (Suzuki). - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260126-arm_coresight_refactor_dev_register-v2-0… Changes in v2: - Refined the commit log in patch 06 (Suzuki). - Unified to call coresight_unregister() for error handling (Suzuki). - Refactor connection and sysfs group release. - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20250512154108.23920-1-leo.yan@arm… To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose(a)arm.com> To: Mike Leach <mike.leach(a)arm.com> To: James Clark <james.clark(a)linaro.org> To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin(a)linux.intel.com> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier(a)linaro.org> To: Mao Jinlong <quic_jinlmao(a)quicinc.com> Cc: coresight(a)lists.linaro.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel(a)lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan(a)arm.com> --- Leo Yan (8): coresight: Fix memory leak in coresight_alloc_device_name() coresight: Get parent device reference after sink ID map allocation coresight: Protect unregistration with mutex coresight: Refactor output connection sysfs link cleanup coresight: Refactor sysfs connection group cleanup coresight: Move sink validation into etm_perf_add_symlink_sink() coresight: Do not mix success path with failure handling coresight: Unify error handling in coresight_register() drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-catu.c | 4 +- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c | 230 +++++++++++++-------- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-ctcu-core.c | 4 +- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c | 19 +- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-dummy.c | 7 +- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etb10.c | 4 +- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c | 5 +- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-funnel.c | 4 +- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c | 2 +- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-priv.h | 3 +- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c | 4 +- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c | 4 +- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c | 12 +- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tnoc.c | 4 +- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.c | 4 +- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c | 4 +- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpiu.c | 4 +- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c | 4 +- include/linux/coresight.h | 14 +- 19 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 161 deletions(-) --- base-commit: eebe8dbd8630f51cf70b1f68a440cd3d7f7a914d change-id: 20260120-arm_coresight_refactor_dev_register-f16c069db41d Best regards, -- Leo Yan <leo.yan(a)arm.com>

4 days, 2 hours

Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-binding: document QCOM platforms for CTCU device

by Suzuki K Poulose

On 03/02/2026 09:36, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 2/3/26 10:31 AM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: >> On 03/02/2026 09:00, Jie Gan wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2/3/2026 4:50 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>>> On 2/3/26 9:08 AM, Jie Gan wrote: >>>>> Document the platforms that fallback to using the qcom,sa8775p-ctcu >>>>> compatible for probing. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jie Gan <jie.gan(a)oss.qualcomm.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-ctcu.yaml | 4 ++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight- ctcu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight- ctcu.yaml >>>>> index e002f87361ad..68853db52bef 100644 >>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-ctcu.yaml >>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-ctcu.yaml >>>>> @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ properties: >>>>> oneOf: >>>>> - items: >>>>> - enum: >>>>> + - qcom,glymur-ctcu >>>>> + - qcom,hamoa-ctcu >>>>> + - qcom,kaanapali-ctcu >>>>> + - qcom,pakala-ctcu >>>> >>>> Platforms with existing numeric compatibles should continue to use them, >>>> so that the mess is somewhat containable >>> >>> Sure Konrad. So for Pakala, I will change it back to qcom,sm8750-ctcu >> >> Why do we need different compatibles for the others ? Are they not all compliant to the CTCU programming model ? i.e., sa8775p-ctcu ? or even, >> a generic, >> >> qcom,coresight-ctcu > > It's a huge anti-pattern with the DT maintainers, since a compatible is > the only way to effectively differentiate different implementations (i.e. > instances on different SoCs) of an IP block Do you mean, same IP block integrated to different SoC ? Or are they different implementations altogether ? Why are these not applicable for other components ? (e.g., Tnoc, I-Tnoc, TPDA, TPDM etc ?) > > This is important for the case where a DTB is shipped as part of firmware > and can not be replaced - if some quirk needs to be applied retroactively, > we can look for "qcom,glymur-ctcu" without affecting all the 50 other' > users of the effectively-identical IP block Fair enough, thank for the explanation. Kind regards Suzuki > > In this case, we're already reducing the impact on the driver, as that > only looks for the single fallback compatible (qcom,sa8775p-ctcu) > > Konrad

4 days, 4 hours

Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-binding: document QCOM platforms for CTCU device

by Suzuki K Poulose

On 03/02/2026 09:00, Jie Gan wrote: > > > On 2/3/2026 4:50 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 2/3/26 9:08 AM, Jie Gan wrote: >>> Document the platforms that fallback to using the qcom,sa8775p-ctcu >>> compatible for probing. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jie Gan <jie.gan(a)oss.qualcomm.com> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-ctcu.yaml | 4 >>> ++++ >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight- >>> ctcu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight- >>> ctcu.yaml >>> index e002f87361ad..68853db52bef 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-ctcu.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-ctcu.yaml >>> @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ properties: >>> oneOf: >>> - items: >>> - enum: >>> + - qcom,glymur-ctcu >>> + - qcom,hamoa-ctcu >>> + - qcom,kaanapali-ctcu >>> + - qcom,pakala-ctcu >> >> Platforms with existing numeric compatibles should continue to use them, >> so that the mess is somewhat containable > > Sure Konrad. So for Pakala, I will change it back to qcom,sm8750-ctcu Why do we need different compatibles for the others ? Are they not all compliant to the CTCU programming model ? i.e., sa8775p-ctcu ? or even, a generic, qcom,coresight-ctcu Suzuki > > Thanks, > Jie > >> >> Konrad >

4 days, 4 hours

Re: [PATCH v3] coresight: etm3x: Fix cntr_val_show() to match cntr_val_store() behavior

by Suzuki K Poulose

Hello On 02/02/2026 05:09, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 09:26:19AM +0000, James Clark wrote: >> >> >> On 02/12/2025 8:26 am, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote: >>> The cntr_val_show() function was intended to print the values of all >>> counters using a loop. However, due to a buffer overwrite issue with >>> sprintf(), it effectively only displayed the value of the last counter. >>> >>> The companion function, cntr_val_store(), allows users to modify a >>> specific counter selected by 'cntr_idx'. To maintain consistency >>> between read and write operations and to align with the ETM4x driver >>> behavior, modify cntr_val_show() to report only the value of the >>> currently selected counter. >>> >>> This change removes the loop and the "counter %d:" prefix, printing >>> only the hexadecimal value. It also adopts sysfs_emit() for standard >>> sysfs output formatting. >>> >>> Fixes: a939fc5a71ad ("coresight-etm: add CoreSight ETM/PTM driver") >>> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org >>> Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw(a)gmail.com> >>> --- >>> Build test only. >>> >>> Changes in v3: >>> - Switch format specifier to %#x to include the 0x prefix. >>> - Add Cc stable >>> >>> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251201095228.1905489-1-visitorckw@gmail.com/ >>> >>> .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x-sysfs.c | 15 ++++----------- >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x-sysfs.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x-sysfs.c >>> index 762109307b86..b3c67e96a82a 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x-sysfs.c >>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x-sysfs.c >>> @@ -717,26 +717,19 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(cntr_rld_event); >>> static ssize_t cntr_val_show(struct device *dev, >>> struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) >>> { >>> - int i, ret = 0; >>> u32 val; >>> struct etm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent); >>> struct etm_config *config = &drvdata->config; >>> if (!coresight_get_mode(drvdata->csdev)) { >>> spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock); >>> - for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nr_cntr; i++) >>> - ret += sprintf(buf, "counter %d: %x\n", >>> - i, config->cntr_val[i]); >>> + val = config->cntr_val[config->cntr_idx]; >>> spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock); >>> - return ret; >>> - } >>> - >>> - for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nr_cntr; i++) { >>> - val = etm_readl(drvdata, ETMCNTVRn(i)); >>> - ret += sprintf(buf, "counter %d: %x\n", i, val); >>> + } else { >>> + val = etm_readl(drvdata, ETMCNTVRn(config->cntr_idx)); >>> } >>> - return ret; >>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%#x\n", val); >>> } >>> static ssize_t cntr_val_store(struct device *dev, >> >> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark(a)linaro.org> >> > Thanks for the review! > Is there anything else I need to do for this fix to land? Thanks for the patch, I will queue this for the next release (v7.1). Suzuki > > Regards, > Kuan-Wei >

5 days, 4 hours

Hire SAFEGUARD RECOVERY, a Bitcoin recovery specialist, to retrieve stolen or lost coins.

by sophia fourest

I invested $320,000 in Tether (USDT) on a fraudulent website after falling for a romantic scam. I felt completely helpless and in need of assistance after realizing I had been duped. I started looking for a hacker online and found SAFEGUARD RECOVERY. I had optimism because of his professionalism and knowledge. I'm happy to report that SAFEGUARD RECOVERY successfully recovered my stolen money after working relentlessly to do so! I am immensely appreciative of their help and heartily urge anyone in a comparable circumstance to use their services. I'm grateful Email: safeguardbitcoin(a)consultant.com WhatsApp: +44 7426 168300 Website: https://safeguardbitcoin.wixsite.com/safeguard-bitcoin--1

5 days, 15 hours

Hire SAFEGUARD RECOVERY, a Bitcoin recovery specialist, to retrieve stolen or lost coins.

by sophia fourest

5 days, 15 hours

[PATCH v2] stm class: Fix Kconfig symbols

by Leo Yan

Kconfig symbols must not include the CONFIG_ prefix. Remove the CONFIG_ prefix for default values to work. The STM_PROTO_SYS_T config is selected by default when STM is enabled. However, its description currently says "If you don't know what this is, say N," which contradicts the default behavior. Update the description to say "Y" to align with the default setting. Fixes: a02509f301c6 ("stm class: Factor out default framing protocol") Fixes: d69d5e83110f ("stm class: Add MIPI SyS-T protocol support") Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan(a)arm.com> --- Changes in v2: - Updated STM_PROTO_BASIC description to align with default selection (James). - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251217-fix_stm_kconfig-v1-1-531fb3674549@arm.com --- drivers/hwtracing/stm/Kconfig | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/Kconfig b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/Kconfig index eda6b11d40a1f9ab49a1ec1e6faae8ee178c5ed3..8ab079785189052945521e9b0a93a0d458de37e0 100644 --- a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/Kconfig @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ if STM config STM_PROTO_BASIC tristate "Basic STM framing protocol driver" - default CONFIG_STM + default STM help This is a simple framing protocol for sending data over STM devices. This was the protocol that the STM framework used @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ config STM_PROTO_BASIC config STM_PROTO_SYS_T tristate "MIPI SyS-T STM framing protocol driver" - default CONFIG_STM + default STM help This is an implementation of MIPI SyS-T protocol to be used over the STP transport. In addition to the data payload, it @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ config STM_PROTO_SYS_T The receiving side must be able to decode this protocol in addition to the MIPI STP, in order to extract the data. - If you don't know what this is, say N. + If you don't know what this is, say Y. config STM_DUMMY tristate "Dummy STM driver" --- base-commit: fcb70a56f4d81450114034b2c61f48ce7444a0e2 change-id: 20251216-fix_stm_kconfig-a72f40c7612c Best regards, -- Leo Yan <leo.yan(a)arm.com>

1 week, 3 days

Re: [PATCH v10 5/8] dt-bindings: arm: add an interrupt property for Coresight CTCU

by Suzuki K Poulose

On 22/01/2026 02:08, Jie Gan wrote: > Add an interrupt property to CTCU device. The interrupt will be triggered > when the data size in the ETR buffer exceeds the threshold of the > BYTECNTRVAL register. Programming a threshold in the BYTECNTRVAL register > of CTCU device will enable the interrupt. > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski(a)linaro.org> > Reviewed-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach(a)linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Jie Gan <jie.gan(a)oss.qualcomm.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-ctcu.yaml | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-ctcu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-ctcu.yaml > index c969c16c21ef..ac27a8b89085 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-ctcu.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-ctcu.yaml > @@ -39,6 +39,11 @@ properties: > items: > - const: apb > > + interrupts: > + items: > + - description: Interrupt for the ETR device connected to in-port0. > + - description: Interrupt for the ETR device connected to in-port1. Is this all the hardware supports ? i.e., can it only have two ports ever ? If not, why restrict it to two ? Suzuki > + > label: > description: > Description of a coresight device. > @@ -60,6 +65,8 @@ additionalProperties: false > > examples: > - | > + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> > + > ctcu@1001000 { > compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-ctcu"; > reg = <0x1001000 0x1000>; > @@ -67,6 +74,9 @@ examples: > clocks = <&aoss_qmp>; > clock-names = "apb"; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 270 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, > + <GIC_SPI 262 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; > + > in-ports { > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <0>; >

1 week, 4 days

[PATCH v2 0/8] coresight: Fix device registration and unregistration

by Leo Yan

This series is to fix and refactor CoreSight device registration and unregistration, it can be divided into three small parts: Patches 01-03: Three fixes for memory leak, device reference and mutex protection. Patches 04-05: Move connection cleanup operations into coresight_remove_conns(). Patches 06-08: Refactor error handling in coresight_register(). This series is verified on Juno board with kmemleak detector. For kmemleak verifying: echo clear > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak insmod coresight modules rmmod coresight modules echo scan > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak The result shows no memory leak during a cycle of device registration and unregistration. --- Changes in v2: - Refined the commit log in patch 06 (Suzuki). - Unified to call coresight_unregister() for error handling (Suzuki). - Refactor connection and sysfs group release. - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20250512154108.23920-1-leo.yan@arm… To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose(a)arm.com> To: Mike Leach <mike.leach(a)linaro.org> To: James Clark <james.clark(a)linaro.org> To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin(a)linux.intel.com> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier(a)linaro.org> To: Mao Jinlong <quic_jinlmao(a)quicinc.com> Cc: coresight(a)lists.linaro.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel(a)lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan(a)arm.com> --- Leo Yan (8): coresight: Fix memory leak in coresight_alloc_device_name() coresight: Get parent device reference after sink ID map allocation coresight: Protect unregistration with mutex coresight: Refactor output connection sysfs link cleanup coresight: Refactor sysfs connection group cleanup coresight: Move sink validation into etm_perf_add_symlink_sink() coresight: Do not mix success path with failure handling coresight: Unify error handling in coresight_register() drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c | 105 +++++++++++------------ drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c | 5 +- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c | 2 +- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-priv.h | 3 +- 4 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-) --- base-commit: eebe8dbd8630f51cf70b1f68a440cd3d7f7a914d change-id: 20260120-arm_coresight_refactor_dev_register-f16c069db41d Best regards, -- Leo Yan <leo.yan(a)arm.com>

1 week, 4 days

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

CoreSight