CoreSight August 2021

coresight@lists.linaro.org

11 participants
27 discussions

Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] perf auxtrace arm: Support compat_auxtrace_mmap__{read_head|write_tail}

by Leo Yan

Hi Russell, On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 02:39:18PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 09:30:43PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 01:23:42PM +0100, James Clark wrote: [...] > > > For x86, it's possible to include tools/include/asm/atomic.h, but that doesn't > > > include arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h and there are some other #ifdefs that might > > > make it not so easy for Arm. Just wondering if you considered trying to include the > > > existing one? Or decided that it was easier to duplicate it? > > > > Good finding! > > > > With you reminding, I recognized that the atomic operations for > > arm/arm64 should be improved for user space program. So far, perf tool > > simply uses the compiler's atomic implementations (from > > asm-generic/atomic-gcc.h) for arm/arm64; but for a more reliable > > implementation, I think we should improve the user space program with > > architecture's atomic instructions. > > No we should not. Sometimes, what's in the kernel is for the kernel's > use only, and not for userspace's use. That may be because what works > in kernel space does not work in userspace. > > For example, the ARMv6+ atomic operations can be executed in userspace > _provided_ they are only used on memory which has an exclusive monitor. > They can't be used on anything that is not "normal memory". Okay, IIUC, the requirement for "normal memory" and exclusive monitor should also apply on aarch64 for ldrex/strex, Load-Acquire and Store-Release instructions, etc. Otherwise, it's heavily dependent on the exclusive monitors outside the cache coherency domain (but this is out of the scopes for CPU). perf tool is very likely to map memory with "normal memory" but we cannot say it's always true. So I agree there have risk for exporting the aarch32/aarch64 atomic headers to user space. > Prior to > ARMv6, the atomic operations rely on disabling interrupts. That > facility is simply not available to userspace, so these must not be > made available to userspace. > > The same applies to bitops. > > We've been here before in the past, when the kernel headers were not > separated from the user ABI headers, and people would write programs > that included e.g. bitops.h on x86 because they had optimised bitops > code. This made the userspace programs very non-portable - without > re-implementing userspace versions of this stuff in every userspace > program that did this stuff. > > So no, having experienced the effects of this kind of thing in the > past, the kernel should _not_ export architecture specific code in > header files to userspace. > > Also, it should be pointed out that by doing so, you create a licensing > issue. If the code is GPLv2, and you build your program such that it > incorporates GPLv2 code, then if the userspace program is not GPLv2 > compliant, you have a licensing problem, and in effect the program > can be distributed. > > Please do not go down this route. Thanks a lot for the suggestion and quick response. Leo

4 years

Query regarding AXI Write Burst Length in ETR driver

by Tanmay Jagdale

Hi All, The AXI write burst length is set to 0xF in TMC_AXICTL register in the TMC ETR driver. Definition in coresight-tmc.h #define TMC_AXICTL_WR_BURST_16 0xF00 Marvell CN10K chip uses Coresight SoC-600 IP. Since write burst length field is implementation defined, the maximum value supported by our chip is 0x7. We could not find a way to figure out the maximum supported value through any of the ETR registers. So can you please recommend a way to choose the value 0x7 without affecting other silicons ? With Regards, Tanmay

4 years

[PATCH v3 0/1] perf tools: Warning fixes

by James Clark

Changes since v2: Add Leo's reviewed by tag that I missed James Clark (1): perf cs-etm: Add warnings for missing DSOs tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.23.0

4 years

[RFC PATCH 0/6] perf tools: Warning fixes

by James Clark

I'm submitting this as an RFC because there are a few changes I'd like to get feedback on. The two changes I wanted to make were the last two for Coresight warnings, but I ended up making some perf-wide changes along the way. For #1 (perf tools: Add WARN_ONCE equivalent for UI warnings) * Does it make sense to add warn once equivalents at all, or should the once be re-done for each usage? * Or should there be some kind of generic 'once' wrapper? For #3 (perf tools: Add disassembly warnings for annotate --stdio) * If the output is interpreted by any other tools, then adding these warnings could be an issue, so maybe this change could be dropped, but no error output at all isn't ideal. For #4 (perf tools: Add flag for tracking warnings of missing DSOs) * In theory I could re-use 'annotate_warned', but it might make sense to rename it in that case, or just leave the new auxtrace_warned and remove any confusion. This set applies to perf/core e73f0f0ee7541 Thanks James James Clark (6): perf tools: Add WARN_ONCE equivalent for UI warnings perf tools: Re-add annotate_warned functionality perf tools: Add disassembly warnings for annotate --stdio perf tools: Add flag for tracking warnings of missing DSOs perf cs-etm: Improve Coresight zero timestamp warning perf cs-etm: Add warnings for missing DSOs tools/perf/ui/browsers/annotate.c | 1 + tools/perf/ui/gtk/annotate.c | 1 + tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++-- .../perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c | 7 +++++-- tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 10 +++++++++- tools/perf/util/debug.h | 14 +++++++++++++ tools/perf/util/dso.h | 1 + 7 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) -- 2.28.0

4 years

[PATCH 0/6] Support ETE decoding

by James Clark

Decoding ETE already works because it is a superset of ETMv4, but if any new packet types are found then they will be ignored by the decoder. This patchset creates an ETE decoder which can output the new packets and saves a new register that is required. No new packet types are handled by perf yet, as this can be added in the future. This set applies on top of "perf cs-etm: Support TRBE (unformatted decoding)" on perf/core. James Clark (6): perf cs-etm: Refactor initialisation of decoder params. perf cs-etm: Initialise architecture based on TRCIDR1 perf cs-etm: Save TRCDEVARCH register perf cs-etm: Update OpenCSD decoder for ETE perf cs-etm: Create ETE decoder perf cs-etm: Print the decoder name tools/build/feature/test-libopencsd.c | 4 +- tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c | 13 +- .../perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c | 151 ++++++++---------- .../perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.h | 8 + tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 54 ++++++- tools/perf/util/cs-etm.h | 6 +- 6 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-) -- 2.28.0

4 years

[PATCH v2 0/1] perf tools: Warning fixes

by James Clark

Changes since v1: * Remove first 5 patches as they have been applied to perf/core * Add Leo's kernel symbols suggestion and reviewed by tag * Add reference to debuginfod as suggested by Arnaldo Applies to perf/core f3c33cbd92 James Clark (1): perf cs-etm: Add warnings for missing DSOs tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.23.0

4 years

Re: [PATCH 14/38] coresight: Replace deprecated CPU-hotplug functions.

by Mathieu Poirier

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 04:15:57PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > The functions get_online_cpus() and put_online_cpus() have been > deprecated during the CPU hotplug rework. They map directly to > cpus_read_lock() and cpus_read_unlock(). > > Replace deprecated CPU-hotplug functions with the official version. > The behavior remains unchanged. > > Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier(a)linaro.org> > Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose(a)arm.com> > Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach(a)linaro.org> > Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan(a)linaro.org> > Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin(a)linux.intel.com> > Cc: coresight(a)lists.linaro.org > Cc: linux-arm-kernel(a)lists.infradead.org > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy(a)linutronix.de> > --- > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c > index 9731d3a960735..00de46565bc40 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c > @@ -588,11 +588,11 @@ static int debug_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id) > > drvdata->base = base; > > - get_online_cpus(); > + cpus_read_lock(); > per_cpu(debug_drvdata, drvdata->cpu) = drvdata; > ret = smp_call_function_single(drvdata->cpu, debug_init_arch_data, > drvdata, 1); > - put_online_cpus(); > + cpus_read_unlock(); > Applied - thanks, Mathieu > if (ret) { > dev_err(dev, "CPU%d debug arch init failed\n", drvdata->cpu); > -- > 2.32.0 >

4 years

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

CoreSight August 2021