On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Pascal Brand pascal.brand@linaro.org wrote:

Hello all,

Juno support may take more time than expected. So Joakim and I decided to put it out of the picture of the release 1.0.0. That means:

• https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/pull/6 and

https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/pull/488 are skipped in the release.

• https://github.com/OP-TEE/build/pull/13 is entirely skipped. It

contains some Juno support, but also other minor fixes. I would prefer skipping everything, *Jerome / Joakim*: are you ok to skip the whole pull-request in the release?

OK, as you prefer. I have no Juno board, and no reason to push to have

this merged immediately.

• https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/pull/6 is merged, indicating Juno

is not part of the repo. If you have any comments on the release notes, it is not too late. We can add another pull-request to fix or add things. *Joakim*, anything to add to the release notes?

• https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/pull/7 has been modified.

juno_stable.mk is no more there, and it points to 1.0.0-rc2.

So we are "*Step 3/:* Tests all platfforms". Could you

repo init -u https://github.com/pascal-brand-st-dev/manifest.git -m <target>*_stable*.xml -b newtag

and make some tests on your dedicated platform. Once ok, please add the "Tested-By" tag on https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/pull/7

Thanks all, Pascal.

On 8 October 2015 at 10:36, Pascal Brand pascal.brand@linaro.org wrote:

...

Hello,

We're almost ready to set the 1.0.0 tag. I need your help to finalize it.

*Step 1/* Last pull-requests to be merged Here are the pull-requests on hold:

• https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/pull/486: the release notes

attempt. *Joakim / Jérôme*, could you have a look and add what I missed (and fix english too)

• https://github.com/OP-TEE/build/pull/13: mostly the juno build, but

also some other stuff (clean / GP tests). Cédric tested Juno runtime on standard xtest successfully. *Jérome / Jens*, could you add Reviewed-By and/or Tested-by tags if it looks ok?

• https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/pull/6: manifest on Juno. Tested

successfully by *Cedric. Cédric / Jens*, could you add the tags when you're happy with it?

• https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/pull/488: Remove setup script of

Juno. *Cedric / Jens*, could you add the tags when you're happy with it?

• *All*: did I miss anything to push for 1.0.0

*Step 2/* Set 1.0.0-rc2 Once they are merged, I will create a new tag 1.0.0-rc2, and update https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/pull/7 with it.

*Step 3/:* Tests all platfforms Then tests will be required using (note this is the "stable" version of the xml that is to be used)

repo init -u https://github.com/pascal-brand-st-dev/manifest.git -m <target>*_stable*.xml -b newtag

Could you then please test the following targets, and add a Tested-By on https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/pull/7:

• *Pascal*: QEMU (default) + STM
  • *Jerome*: HiKey
  • *SY* or *James*: Mediatek
  • *Jens*: FVP
  • *Cedric*: Juno

*Step 4/*: Set final 1.0.0 Last step in my plate:

• merge https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/pull/7 using 1.0.0 version

instead of 1.0.0-rc2

• set 1.0.0 on all components
• remove 1.0.0-rcxxx tags from all OP-TEE gits

*Step 5/* Final test Then the "+" step: test the final 1.0.0 using

repo init -u https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest.git -m <target>*_stable*.xml -b 1.0.0

Let me know in case I missed anything.

Thanks all, Pascal.

---

Tee-dev mailing list Tee-dev@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/tee-dev

Hi,

On 9 October 2015 at 08:42, Pascal Brand pascal.brand@linaro.org wrote:

Hello all,

Juno support may take more time than expected. So Joakim and I decided to put it out of the picture of the release 1.0.0. That means:

• https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/pull/6 and

https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/pull/488 are skipped in the release.

• https://github.com/OP-TEE/build/pull/13 is entirely skipped. It

contains some Juno support, but also other minor fixes.

Yes (might be a good idea to rename the pull request since it is indeed

touching other platforms also).

• I would prefer skipping everything, *Jerome / Joakim*: are you ok to

skip the whole pull-request in the release?

Yes.

• https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/pull/6 is merged, indicating Juno

is not part of the repo.

I don't think I understand this line? It's not merged (still Open) and

it's only about Juno for repo? But as stated above we will not include this in the release tag.

• If you have any comments on the release notes, it is not too late.

We can add another pull-request to fix or add things. *Joakim*, anything to add to the release notes?

I checked PR486 and what you have merged covers it all I think, so release

notes are good as it is now.

• https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/pull/7 has been modified.

juno_stable.mk is no more there, and it points to 1.0.0-rc2.

So we are "*Step 3/:* Tests all platfforms". Could you

repo init -u https://github.com/pascal-brand-st-dev/manifest.git -m <target>*_stable*.xml -b newtag

and make some tests on your dedicated platform. Once ok, please add the "Tested-By" tag on https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/pull/7

I will see if I can test FVP and MTK.

Regards, Joakim