Hi,

On 9 October 2015 at 08:42, Pascal Brand <pascal.brand@linaro.org> wrote:

Hello all,

Juno support may take more time than expected. So Joakim and I decided to put it out of the picture of the release 1.0.0.
That means:
https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/pull/6 and https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/pull/488 are skipped in the release.
https://github.com/OP-TEE/build/pull/13 is entirely skipped. It contains some Juno support, but also other minor fixes.

Yes (might be a good idea to rename the pull request since it is indeed touching other platforms also).

I would prefer skipping everything, Jerome / Joakim: are you ok to skip the whole pull-request in the release?

Yes.

https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/pull/6 is merged, indicating Juno is not part of the repo.

I don't think I understand this line? It's not merged (still Open) and it's only about Juno for repo? But as stated above we will not include this in the release tag.

If you have any comments on the release notes, it is not too late. We can add another pull-request to fix or add things. Joakim, anything to add to the release notes?

I checked PR486 and what you have merged covers it all I think, so release notes are good as it is now.

https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/pull/7 has been modified. juno_stable.mk is no more there, and it points to 1.0.0-rc2.

So we are "Step 3/: Tests all platfforms". Could you
repo init -u https://github.com/pascal-brand-st-dev/manifest.git -m <target>_stable.xml -b newtag
and make some tests on your dedicated platform. Once ok, please add the "Tested-By" tag on https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/pull/7

I will see if I can test FVP and MTK.

Regards,

Joakim