Hi,
On 9 October 2015 at 08:42, Pascal Brand pascal.brand@linaro.org wrote:
Hello all,
Juno support may take more time than expected. So Joakim and I decided to put it out of the picture of the release 1.0.0. That means:
https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/pull/488 are skipped in the release.
- https://github.com/OP-TEE/build/pull/13 is entirely skipped. It
contains some Juno support, but also other minor fixes.
Yes (might be a good idea to rename the pull request since it is indeed
touching other platforms also).
- I would prefer skipping everything, *Jerome / Joakim*: are you ok to
skip the whole pull-request in the release?
Yes.
- https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/pull/6 is merged, indicating Juno
is not part of the repo.
I don't think I understand this line? It's not merged (still Open) and
it's only about Juno for repo? But as stated above we will not include this in the release tag.
- If you have any comments on the release notes, it is not too late.
We can add another pull-request to fix or add things. *Joakim*, anything to add to the release notes?
I checked PR486 and what you have merged covers it all I think, so release
notes are good as it is now.
- https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/pull/7 has been modified.
juno_stable.mk is no more there, and it points to 1.0.0-rc2.
So we are "*Step 3/:* Tests all platfforms". Could you
repo init -u https://github.com/pascal-brand-st-dev/manifest.git -m <target>*_stable*.xml -b newtag
and make some tests on your dedicated platform. Once ok, please add the "Tested-By" tag on https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/pull/7
I will see if I can test FVP and MTK.
Regards, Joakim