Tcwg-commits September 2023

tcwg-commits@lists.linaro.org

5 participants
22766 discussions

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 updated (c991cde04 -> 375bde12b)

by git＠git.linaro.org

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO updated (77240d25 -> 1a3a6d2c)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO. discards 77240d25 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 780e5ef6 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards b9dda536 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards cefd9aa6 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e8238697 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards cbda4edb onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c637a836 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6fc67df4 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c9b1c628 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 01d93acd onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 714aec7d 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 746bff83 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 9a7adc61 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 45d5faa7 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards ee77a2a4 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards df7c2fc7 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 35cae6b7 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 122cb756 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 306a4a02 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b7038e0e 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 1148383b 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3f84ef5d 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 3e91ce24 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 44747065 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f01975ea 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards f15cdcbd 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 175ad9d9 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 81d90343 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards a3861d8b 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 8432fd7a 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 10791bb4 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards f3f5055a 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards f5ed700a 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards b2b60d3d 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards a1bfdb57 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 7642db18 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 820e0218 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards df9b2755 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards da36bb26 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 674b4d87 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 48a2f022 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 94681653 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 6ec797d2 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 459bb67e 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5c4b32d0 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 96ac009c 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards cc44aac4 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 49ec6081 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards cfa8a0e5 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 827d425a 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 6f63c4d3 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 1f12f98c 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards e2cf2026 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards d7e79f0c 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 86ae9656 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 16900903 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 065cad34 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards b20b9495 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards fb661df1 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards f3e65a54 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 7c0d5d44 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards d5deef77 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 8199ad38 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards c7f03c4c 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 1728445d 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards a219c2d3 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 7d2d4ac9 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 4caaa3c0 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 1ada8f83 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 8e3d4a7a 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards e15ac06e 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 697fe537 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards d59e3f46 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 9dced195 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 10ef6d73 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 7b1aaa37 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 5950a9fa 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 60c2c96e 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards dd766c05 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards fc4a4536 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8f57aa4c 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 69ce3c8d 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ee7b1199 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6d5036fe 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards bb9d78b9 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 84d7430b 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 2a2b2032 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 7daa72a2 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 0222b08f 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 0bfd2772 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards 7a1bf02e 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 8489ba37 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards 54e5dca7 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 7f03bd73 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 228c967b 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards abf12af3 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards 90ea1155 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b27f9064 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 39d277f9 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 46910f82 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] discards 1b3157d8 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 0a86c714 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fc05f224 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c996c5d6 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5dc091ae 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards f49e78da 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards d7ada8bb 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 17497c12 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] new 08f1658d onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new e0e906bf 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 499687c1 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 4ed6f6ec 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new ce1c465a 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9c45cb7c 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 73e70384 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6e721370 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new a2be1b6a 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new 7b7bdc00 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 733c3513 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 18ffd2af 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 207a8f37 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new 893d45c5 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new c2cb69be 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 710d190c 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 90d7cdbf 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 94dac05f 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 94d4eafc 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 756bc915 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 5470421e 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new a2537368 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 28502cb9 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new b1537622 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8cca374f 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 488cfca1 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8e460330 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7b29a4ab 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 0bfbf1e7 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 24840ae7 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new dfbe04dc 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new c0f6f8fa 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 0edd90ff 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new f1924986 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new a371dcdb 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new f1679295 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 42454134 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 53aaadff 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new b11d31cb 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 6336ed50 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new f2e4a3d4 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new c4260c74 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new ba2ba44d 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 63833fd9 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 66753469 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new f5d1f8d2 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 82cb31fc 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new c6452806 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 2edf8fa9 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 86d019bc 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new c2b770e0 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new b79cc04c 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 8c07b141 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 321b5501 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 9a102d42 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 167457b6 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new a5143175 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 6723d4a7 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 31bae798 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new c2e9957b 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 4944a2f8 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new cc214392 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 991a75e7 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 2d2d3a68 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new f67894b5 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 99ffbb16 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 439f4ec3 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 1bba0252 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 24239759 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new d58e1d5d 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 327a5e14 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 572e78d2 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new ce6b7075 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 48ecb088 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 2122457c 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new eb2a1fae 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new db7d3358 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new c2e4e97d 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new acfca0d8 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 4f7149b4 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 2b0b8241 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 54567bc2 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 41225833 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 29072d93 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 2c399b04 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5dc9a894 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new cce02ab0 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 7355ceee 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5af8d589 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 93a586da 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a2224a9f 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new c5e30481 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new c49e0ebd 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new c62369e5 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 794c31ca 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 75422a71 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e267bbf5 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 9dcdc5fc 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 680a6c83 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 84b3f9b1 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 0a83556b onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new fdd84c25 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e93e4626 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 883223d8 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ce0e5294 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 442c5e9a onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 1fcda641 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 1a3a6d2c onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (77240d25) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 108 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-qc_speed-cpu2017rate/llvm-aarch64-master-O2_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-qc_speed-cpu2017rate/llvm-aarch64-master-O2_LTO updated (c327908 -> b76371b)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-qc_speed-cpu2017rate/llvm-aarch64-master-O2_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-qc_speed-cpu2017rate/llvm-aarch64-master-O2_LTO. from c327908 onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new b76371b onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] The 1 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2400 -> 2428 bytes 02-build_bmk_llvm/console.log.xz | Bin 107528 -> 108252 bytes 03-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 44 +- 03-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 3136 -> 3132 bytes 04-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 3348 -> 3420 bytes 04-check_regression/output-bmk-results.log | 48 +- annex/bmk-data | 2 +- git/llvm_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/notify-full.log | 244 +- jenkins/notify-init.log | 74 +- jenkins/rewrite.log | 24 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 8 +- manifest.sh | 4 +- notify/any.skipped | 1 - notify/jira/comment-template.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 18 +- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- notify/output-bmk-results.log | 81 +- results-vs-prev/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 2 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 44 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 24 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 83 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 10881 ++- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 97678 ++++++++++----------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 24 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 81 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 87 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 98176 +++++++++++----------- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 38 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 89 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 44 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 44 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 44 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 2150 +- 35 files changed, 104963 insertions(+), 105082 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 notify/any.skipped -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 updated (b521b6fdf -> c991cde04)

by git＠git.linaro.org

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO updated (7a30f719 -> 77240d25)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO. omits 7a30f719 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] omits c1076404 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] omits 6add1a0b onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] omits eda175a5 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 72108ed4 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 37380837 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 11edd630 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 132f09f1 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits dc1fe721 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 478f1471 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 946e9ed0 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits aa8b8e9b 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits bacbc6d9 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 51e4f010 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 2127b849 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] omits 15d9daf2 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 0114925c 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 5bc38d36 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 768c627d 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 029affaa 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 98549a20 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 07724bb6 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 7589169f 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 7c100be7 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits d7230780 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] omits cffd0240 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] omits f939e74a 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] omits 21b3a933 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] omits f0e971bd 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] omits 95f4e0a5 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] omits 32685572 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] omits 155c2388 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] omits 614a405e 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] omits af443c33 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] omits f71fd4f2 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] omits 5cc886ed 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] omits 0649c3a2 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits omits 4d0129e2 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] omits ee471e1f 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] omits 98b823f4 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits omits 5121a9a5 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits omits ace42127 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] omits e6dbeae0 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits bfc4997d 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 9021389b 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] omits 2dcaa49e 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] omits cea69862 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] omits 7c65d612 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 525380e5 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] omits 05ca58e5 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 49ced734 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] omits 307545e8 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 2db72d60 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits f4f74346 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits e1ac4534 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits bb6306a5 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 05305c54 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits 76aad485 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] omits 1b18627d 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] omits 0bfb714d 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits 58dc1528 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] omits 0c87e27b 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits edea5c16 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits ca0d1626 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] omits f885a6d4 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] omits 2c3a4953 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] omits ec01948e 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] omits 405cf4e8 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] omits 71a29540 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] omits c1710fa2 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits 6f7827ab 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] omits 9c26ec4b 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits omits 07c90664 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] omits 03595e19 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits omits a764ed4e 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] omits 6379c186 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] omits b736d54a 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] omits bf61c6ce 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] omits 7486cf1d 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] omits 8785d657 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 34ed8b2a 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] omits c968fd3c 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits b1d587ec 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 9343fb63 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 371d914a 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 67fdde9a 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] omits d452c3c1 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] omits fbe3f167 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits omits 865bb05c 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits omits e671b453 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] omits 9a15cc7a 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] omits e0354b3d 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits omits 77165bbe 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] omits d8afe3d7 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] omits 48de4e5d 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] omits 548d9d61 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits omits ee1a28a2 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 8fc8620c 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 766e8e25 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits d7d806af 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] omits 3af99d07 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] omits 7462f4f5 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 3bfe7a2f 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 2c47111c 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits e9aba9bd 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] omits 4f7ddffd 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] omits 0ddff065 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 398e96bd 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] omits 90d2837b 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new 94c0148b onsuccess: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 17497c12 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by - [...] new d7ada8bb 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f49e78da 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 5dc091ae 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new c996c5d6 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fc05f224 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0a86c714 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1b3157d8 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 46910f82 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new 39d277f9 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b27f9064 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 90ea1155 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new abf12af3 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new 228c967b 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 7f03bd73 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 54e5dca7 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 8489ba37 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 7a1bf02e 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 0bfd2772 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 0222b08f 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 7daa72a2 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 2a2b2032 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 84d7430b 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new bb9d78b9 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6d5036fe 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ee7b1199 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 69ce3c8d 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8f57aa4c 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new fc4a4536 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new dd766c05 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 60c2c96e 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 5950a9fa 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 7b1aaa37 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 10ef6d73 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 9dced195 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new d59e3f46 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 697fe537 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new e15ac06e 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 8e3d4a7a 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 1ada8f83 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 4caaa3c0 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 7d2d4ac9 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new a219c2d3 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 1728445d 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new c7f03c4c 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 8199ad38 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new d5deef77 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 7c0d5d44 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new f3e65a54 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new fb661df1 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new b20b9495 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 065cad34 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 16900903 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 86ae9656 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new d7e79f0c 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new e2cf2026 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 1f12f98c 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 6f63c4d3 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 827d425a 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new cfa8a0e5 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 49ec6081 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new cc44aac4 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 96ac009c 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 5c4b32d0 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 459bb67e 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 6ec797d2 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 94681653 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 48a2f022 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 674b4d87 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new da36bb26 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new df9b2755 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 820e0218 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 7642db18 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new a1bfdb57 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new b2b60d3d 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new f5ed700a 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new f3f5055a 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 10791bb4 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 8432fd7a 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new a3861d8b 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 81d90343 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 175ad9d9 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new f15cdcbd 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new f01975ea 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 44747065 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 3e91ce24 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 3f84ef5d 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1148383b 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b7038e0e 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 306a4a02 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 122cb756 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 35cae6b7 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new df7c2fc7 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new ee77a2a4 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 45d5faa7 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 9a7adc61 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 746bff83 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 714aec7d 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 01d93acd onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c9b1c628 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6fc67df4 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c637a836 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new cbda4edb onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e8238697 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new cefd9aa6 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new b9dda536 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 780e5ef6 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 77240d25 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (7a30f719) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 109 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/v0.0_to_v0.1-102/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO created (now 7a30f71)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/v0.0_to_v0.1-102/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO. at 7a30f71 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] No new revisions were added by this update. -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO updated (6554f3a -> 7a30f71)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO. omits 6554f3a onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] omits 3dcac98 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] omits 2443316 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 2379f5a onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 8cc9959 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 3b4ff11 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 7c15a03 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 1903228 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 8f02bcb onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits e21aff2 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits fac6ab0 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 027f319 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits 4f23800 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits df61c41 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] omits abb8ac3 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] omits f9ceded 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 16b924d 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 4f87af9 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits fbaab9e 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits eccbe28 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 41a4dd9 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits bb6e258 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits c43afd0 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 08068e2 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] omits 1875439 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] omits d832dfa 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] omits 535a1c3 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] omits 21c995c 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] omits 6fea6ee 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] omits 29e1683 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] omits ba5fa56 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] omits 0d81d1f 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] omits 011c8e3 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] omits 007ab66 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] omits dc018c6 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] omits 7520d18 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits omits bc971d3 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] omits 9c0dfcb 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] omits eb29ae7 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits omits 76e26dc 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits omits 075bd97 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] omits 11aef0e 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 53a9eed 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits d98be60 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] omits 3ad8f98 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] omits f897597 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] omits 16e8482 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits cadaa13 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] omits 32c3aae 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 0950f23 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] omits 97ff41d 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 89984a6 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits 586fe5e 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 45f0876 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits 0f0a3e2 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits cb4553a 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits 84dc93d 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] omits c04d8ce 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] omits d9daf00 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits dbaca02 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] omits 78d37d3 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] omits 33a732e 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] omits c36e1b0 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] omits e7dbd91 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] omits eee3598 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] omits 3afb733 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] omits 6dbfbec 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] omits 0e1693f 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] omits 944dc2c 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] omits c037d62 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] omits 9b76836 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits omits 8571fbb 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] omits cb14f23 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits omits 07252b4 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] omits 8d1a662 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] omits 25d4220 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] omits 64eb67e 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] omits b72f41c 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] omits eceeb2c 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 706bb5b 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] omits 9d1c458 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits d8b35ad 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 5624a1a 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 4cbaa56 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 1ec6d86 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] omits 8b1bc04 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] omits bc4bf17 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits omits 9adc48f 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits omits dad4755 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] omits 3c08930 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] omits 712612b 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits omits 911c227 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] omits 3c19de5 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] omits 7c5e91d 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] omits a087a5d 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits omits ffccb69 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 1fcb19b 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 55e7ab9 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 767183e 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] omits c3532a0 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 3af99d0 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new d7d806a 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new 766e8e2 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8fc8620 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ee1a28a 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 548d9d6 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new 48de4e5 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new d8afe3d 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 77165bb 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new e0354b3 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 9a15cc7 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new e671b45 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 865bb05 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new fbe3f16 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new d452c3c 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 67fdde9 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 371d914 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9343fb6 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b1d587e 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c968fd3 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 34ed8b2 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 8785d65 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7486cf1 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new bf61c6c 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new b736d54 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 6379c18 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new a764ed4 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 03595e1 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 07c9066 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 9c26ec4 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 6f7827a 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new c1710fa 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 71a2954 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 405cf4e 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new ec01948 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 2c3a495 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new f885a6d 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new ca0d162 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new edea5c1 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 0c87e27 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 58dc152 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 0bfb714 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 1b18627 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 76aad48 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 05305c5 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new bb6306a 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new e1ac453 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new f4f7434 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 2db72d6 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 307545e 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 49ced73 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 05ca58e 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 525380e 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 7c65d61 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new cea6986 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 2dcaa49 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 9021389 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new bfc4997 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e6dbeae 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ace4212 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 5121a9a 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 98b823f 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new ee471e1 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 4d0129e 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 0649c3a 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 5cc886e 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new f71fd4f 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new af443c3 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 614a405 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 155c238 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 3268557 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 95f4e0a 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new f0e971b 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 21b3a93 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new f939e74 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new cffd024 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new d723078 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 7c100be 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 7589169 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 07724bb 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 98549a2 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 029affa 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 768c627 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5bc38d3 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 0114925 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 15d9daf 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 2127b84 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 51e4f01 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new bacbc6d 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new aa8b8e9 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 946e9ed 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 478f147 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new dc1fe72 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 132f09f onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 11edd63 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 3738083 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 72108ed onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new eda175a onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6add1a0 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c107640 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 7a30f71 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (6554f3a) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2632 -> 2608 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2688 -> 2640 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27984 -> 27728 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17836 -> 17820 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 93880 -> 92404 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 72280 -> 72356 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8692 -> 7832 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 235628 -> 235332 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185880 -> 186168 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 220412 -> 218824 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 184176 -> 183792 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 148 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 3484 -> 3428 bytes 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 6200 -> 6448 bytes 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results.log | 80 +- annex/bmk-data | 2 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/notify-full.log | 186 +- jenkins/notify-init.log | 72 +- jenkins/rewrite.log | 20 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 6 +- manifest.sh | 4 +- notify/any.skipped | 5 +- notify/jira/comment-template.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 40 +- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- notify/output-bmk-results.log | 258 +- results-vs-prev/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 44 +- results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff | 7 + results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 78 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 35 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 176 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 18598 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 526019 +++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 175 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 74292 ++- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 571877 ++++++++++----------- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 64 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 188 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 75 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 75 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 44 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 75 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4860 +- 48 files changed, 590020 insertions(+), 607537 deletions(-) create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 updated (0b3da3114 -> b521b6fdf)

by git＠git.linaro.org

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO updated (a688d2b5e -> 31516975a)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO. discards a688d2b5e onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 851359f4c onsuccess: #81: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 91444605a onsuccess: #80: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d69609d7f onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 22c501130 onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 1da40f6c4 onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 50f5f6cc5 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards cd522e4ea onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 71f618aab onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 54116e1f6 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d2b841ce0 onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8254da790 onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c8e07c31e onsuccess: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 30793e72f onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d69d4c5b3 onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 156b3953c onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards bb3fe1b6d 78: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 44e5ddb26 77: force: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5d8d18a15 76: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 1cf01d9ab 75: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 1c69ab924 74: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ba4ab7864 73: force: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ad53ba025 72: force: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8f5680da7 71: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 4b335b26b 70: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 430f50210 69: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d1cb13554 68: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards ae545ff34 67: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 604e922a7 66: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e29044fd3 65: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e623b4805 64: force: #20: milc_base.default [...] discards 7d057df4e 63: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 029ddfb26 62: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 1bfad14f5 61: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 6dfabb94b 60: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 82f07b49f 59: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 8f6de510e 58: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 21fec283a 57: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards d4319ad14 56: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 538447103 55: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards f4250e080 54: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards aa2ea4e1a 53: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 6ef7a0dbf 52: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards e63edc2d7 51: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 3874166b7 50: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new f8409c7d8 onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] new 968c6eed1 51: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 179f1cc83 52: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 4c6b527ea 53: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 68a87841b 54: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 957ea7654 55: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new ce27e2fb5 56: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 82eb0467d 57: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 4f11419a5 58: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 3d54675da 59: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e1fa8c099 60: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b073813c4 61: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f8d84c14a 62: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 241c33b9c 63: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new c04f98451 64: force: #20: milc_base.default [...] new cd0156bfb 65: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 84f1b6d81 66: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 6d64f947c 67: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 2752e6009 68: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new ee468541a 69: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 43e313540 70: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 67c79f329 71: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 86991e425 72: force: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f7048d486 73: force: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d70a66942 74: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d0856119d 75: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new cd153f4f0 76: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 08ee0c8bd 77: force: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 038a4a4e6 78: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 686ed3cf3 onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 559ba0788 onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 7823a72ea onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 7183b1456 onsuccess: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8761437b8 onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 98b1849e8 onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 799bddda8 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ff64ed7d6 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e17726649 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8bb5c7771 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 69af21fc8 onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1aae4e5b4 onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 45eb54aee onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new fbebb7254 onsuccess: #80: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1d6f8b29c onsuccess: #81: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 31516975a onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (a688d2b5e) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 45 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-aarch64-mainline-allnoconfig] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-aarch64-mainline-allnoconfig updated (ef26f92 -> bfff3fd)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-aarch64-mainline-allnoconfig in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-aarch64-mainline-allnoconfig. from ef26f92 onsuccess: #48: boot: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new bfff3fd onsuccess: #49: boot: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] The 1 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2316 -> 2324 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2616 -> 2604 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27752 -> 28044 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17892 -> 17848 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 74544 -> 74656 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 54456 -> 54760 bytes 05-build_abe-qemu/console.log.xz | Bin 34664 -> 34320 bytes 05-build_abe-qemu/make-qemu.log.xz | Bin 23308 -> 23000 bytes 06-build_linux/console.log.xz | Bin 2900 -> 2900 bytes 08-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 1196 -> 1196 bytes git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- git/qemu_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/notify-full.log | 232 ++++++++++++++--------------- jenkins/notify-init.log | 82 +++++----- jenkins/rewrite.log | 23 +-- jenkins/run-build.env | 6 +- manifest.sh | 4 +- notify/jira/comment-template.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 54 +++---- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- 23 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 205 deletions(-) -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

Tcwg-commits September 2023