Tcwg-commits September 2023

tcwg-commits@lists.linaro.org

5 participants
22766 discussions

[gcc] branch master updated (1560cc94e8a -> d2f53a601a2)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. unknown user pushed a change to branch master in repository gcc. from 1560cc94e8a c++: inherited default constructor [CWG2799] new d2f53a601a2 testsuite work-around compound-assignment-1.c C++ failures [...] The 1 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO updated (ddd1ddaad -> 2ec28e8ac)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO. discards ddd1ddaad onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d964c65fb onsuccess: #81: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 57c099dce onsuccess: #80: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 79ccb1cd9 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a7000ad22 onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards adca3a4e9 onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 96344c07f onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards b8cbd3334 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0ad4dd63f onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 7091dbc5a onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5882b2c5e onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 2cf762567 onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 23ae55d39 onsuccess: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 94b0d2db0 onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 66996e653 onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 4867196ed onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6bb1b6498 78: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e052ed11f 77: force: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 41d1de780 76: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards c6ca2f7fa 75: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e7d4d9641 74: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards bdb3f2598 73: force: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 35685f9c3 72: force: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c197d71ef 71: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards c13c47770 70: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards b65c004d3 69: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e58c11136 68: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 6562a1ac7 67: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a1d85d2c5 66: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards debe6163f 65: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 71483f8c9 64: force: #20: milc_base.default [...] discards efdfdaa70 63: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 1674a6065 62: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards fd27ce998 61: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 7de267339 60: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards ce9cd13a2 59: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 17b85a748 58: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 49b2c3130 57: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards a82d9e6a6 56: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards a3c7718e0 55: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 5cc38a58a 54: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards e0be2e9e7 53: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 670dfb7a4 52: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new af647d6a5 onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] new 5f222e02d 53: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 9d4eff11c 54: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 55f0d7e1b 55: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new a3dbfc672 56: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 16fb26773 57: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new c6afc153f 58: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new dc3eb4ab8 59: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 799a166ea 60: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 1f57edcc0 61: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 35f548894 62: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7d28804b4 63: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 0d47dbfbe 64: force: #20: milc_base.default [...] new ba9ad55d4 65: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 99d4cfe84 66: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a3fc6f5b7 67: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new ba0b0cac4 68: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 3872263db 69: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 9679f6bb0 70: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 44f993b8a 71: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 76180d949 72: force: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8c6083d07 73: force: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 3056e1705 74: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 7944e0345 75: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d12744e41 76: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 6436f7c4f 77: force: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 010483eb9 78: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a86b5c367 onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a9a5a7a44 onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 843ba432b onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 9ecd43602 onsuccess: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new b5fc3cd28 onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 76492d6a7 onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c569c7285 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 5d2bbb14b onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d2e9d04f5 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d7f83897c onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6015134b8 onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new cf2e0013c onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new eacb2b1dc onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 5b762b877 onsuccess: #80: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ab26ebc63 onsuccess: #81: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 2ec28e8ac onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (ddd1ddaad) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 43 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO updated (4642c65e -> cc1d5f79)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO. discards 4642c65e onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 99fc9570 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards e667e3d8 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 074efe4a onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d82a12d1 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9bd41d95 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 7b53ac69 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 65ed8a3e onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 894704d3 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards cadd96fc onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards baa4cb09 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards ac421d7a 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards c58fb487 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards a9c3c1fb 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 6da86229 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 4ec6035d 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards d2ff5abf 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards dee1a2dd 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards ee9f72be 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 56d3f2f6 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e23b816f 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 0dc9baad 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 495e7021 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3b7bcc92 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a919100e 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 5cb6f4f9 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 25b3b3b4 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 496e7311 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 473aaf3d 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards da50e948 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 2f5e34f8 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 025c47b9 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 13c066a1 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 5f10c7ab 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards be661392 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 6f2ef94b 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards d4205582 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 55fd8215 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards da370ad0 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 509dd8ff 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 0f2c0408 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 337589fe 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 3b95fc7f 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e355489c 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c1de9ba4 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 95b14cc0 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards a08b15c6 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 05a4c12b 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 252dbf42 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards dae141df 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 9c012035 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards aee53617 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 702c8a9c 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards e1a3c9f6 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 8eedd8aa 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards bf51772f 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 0ced7b7b 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards d20e2632 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards e8d50b0f 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 27692e14 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards dea40d02 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards ebc2e65d 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 585a5cf4 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 99823716 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 28307d8e 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards d790f6cc 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 0ac51c95 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 072d6e8e 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards db419ba2 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards d9824e8d 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 57dc4713 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards b76a15e6 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 647007ce 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards d60a0dd9 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 2c640dad 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 9d4dabee 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards db67b9de 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards fbfb80c3 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards bff0be32 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 6185a5f3 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5713c098 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 79004eb9 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e1d47919 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ca74df45 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5ed7a9ce 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1a1c4fd8 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards eb315c24 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards b509e106 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards c42546e2 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 3f09a86d 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards c1e3d6a6 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards fc7eb358 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards 2107b879 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards b7adf45f 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards b919f349 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards d6d8ae81 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards f1d72aab 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 46968975 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e370ce20 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d16a0ca3 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] discards 5fc73dcf 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards f6b7b664 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b4ccdad0 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards db993a58 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4684bc93 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards c0198729 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 4fdbf262 onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new e6a30389 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new 24616597 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e9d46a93 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 13c226dd 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d0680ea9 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 6f3864d8 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new 53cf41d7 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 380a78c6 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 293df4f0 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 11b1f790 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new e521d85a 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 9ac1fc9a 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new e34db235 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 6d0aabe8 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new ec505de2 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 928b46f1 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new ccce4e21 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 1976e33e 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 2bf358c9 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new b3f6fcbf 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 55d76e93 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4ab0cc99 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f797f868 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a3eb8505 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fe039bf7 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 6d260bdd 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0b3dcacf 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 88dfe7a1 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new f43d315a 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 712a6373 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 55d535be 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new da900aa3 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 220f017c 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 0c7ca643 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 13457790 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new a9130fe5 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 78385bf3 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 77ac9ab8 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new fc22ac48 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 3429823d 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 0e98cb91 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new eec6bfd8 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 313a678c 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 41d70a78 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 978d07bd 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 54571c53 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new ddb2f960 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new bfa3c957 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 027348d3 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new f246d836 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new fab9e9c7 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 47bb5b3a 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 74896fd9 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 6949ce7d 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 62e7f7d4 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 5256b927 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 49d31cc1 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 92b5d392 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5122ec21 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 45c8375e 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new de2b636d 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new d21cf101 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 301c8c1b 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7da9abbb 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new b8753157 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new de4c96e2 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 8487ae3b 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 175b2d3d 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 2ef14c80 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new fa12fa63 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 7c502621 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 56bfe53d 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new d8897c6d 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 896cb0fa 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new ac751d2c 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 731d4825 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 32ff82b1 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 4794446f 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new d29ba14a 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new ef5267b7 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 7e93ddbe 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new b72a0cad 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 036f043a 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 917096c8 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a0e4fae5 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d10f1345 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new cadb3ac9 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d83f1fe3 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new bf559cd2 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d878a5cc 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a3aeef7d 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new ef18874c 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 29f27231 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 6112f66b 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e054b276 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 989a72ac onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 04650575 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 985e779c onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 39bfade1 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ed3d5b9f onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1f0a122c onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 45975adc onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 39bcca09 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new ab024f5b onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new cc1d5f79 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (4642c65e) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 106 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 updated (1efb38116 -> 8c99bac72)

by git＠git.linaro.org

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO updated (1a3a6d2c -> 4642c65e)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO. discards 1a3a6d2c onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 1fcda641 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 442c5e9a onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards ce0e5294 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 883223d8 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e93e4626 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards fdd84c25 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0a83556b onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 84b3f9b1 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 680a6c83 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9dcdc5fc 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards e267bbf5 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 75422a71 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 794c31ca 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards c62369e5 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards c49e0ebd 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards c5e30481 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a2224a9f 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 93a586da 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 5af8d589 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 7355ceee 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards cce02ab0 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5dc9a894 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 2c399b04 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 29072d93 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 41225833 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 54567bc2 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 2b0b8241 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 4f7149b4 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards acfca0d8 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards c2e4e97d 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards db7d3358 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards eb2a1fae 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 2122457c 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 48ecb088 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards ce6b7075 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 572e78d2 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 327a5e14 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards d58e1d5d 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 24239759 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 1bba0252 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 439f4ec3 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 99ffbb16 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f67894b5 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2d2d3a68 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 991a75e7 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards cc214392 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 4944a2f8 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c2e9957b 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 31bae798 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 6723d4a7 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards a5143175 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 167457b6 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 9a102d42 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 321b5501 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 8c07b141 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards b79cc04c 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards c2b770e0 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 86d019bc 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 2edf8fa9 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards c6452806 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 82cb31fc 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards f5d1f8d2 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 66753469 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 63833fd9 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards ba2ba44d 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards c4260c74 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards f2e4a3d4 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 6336ed50 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards b11d31cb 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 53aaadff 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 42454134 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards f1679295 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards a371dcdb 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards f1924986 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 0edd90ff 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards c0f6f8fa 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards dfbe04dc 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 24840ae7 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 0bfbf1e7 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7b29a4ab 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 8e460330 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 488cfca1 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8cca374f 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b1537622 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 28502cb9 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards a2537368 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 5470421e 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 756bc915 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 94d4eafc 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards 94dac05f 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 90d7cdbf 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards 710d190c 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards c2cb69be 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 893d45c5 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards 207a8f37 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards 18ffd2af 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 733c3513 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7b7bdc00 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a2be1b6a 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] discards 6e721370 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 73e70384 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9c45cb7c 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ce1c465a 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4ed6f6ec 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards 499687c1 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards e0e906bf 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 99ee9ba4 onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c0198729 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 4684bc93 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new db993a58 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b4ccdad0 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f6b7b664 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5fc73dcf 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new d16a0ca3 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new e370ce20 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 46968975 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f1d72aab 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d6d8ae81 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new b919f349 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new b7adf45f 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 2107b879 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new fc7eb358 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new c1e3d6a6 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 3f09a86d 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new c42546e2 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new b509e106 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new eb315c24 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 1a1c4fd8 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 5ed7a9ce 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ca74df45 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e1d47919 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 79004eb9 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5713c098 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 6185a5f3 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new bff0be32 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new fbfb80c3 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new db67b9de 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 9d4dabee 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 2c640dad 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new d60a0dd9 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 647007ce 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new b76a15e6 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 57dc4713 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new d9824e8d 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new db419ba2 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 072d6e8e 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 0ac51c95 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new d790f6cc 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 28307d8e 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 99823716 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 585a5cf4 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new ebc2e65d 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new dea40d02 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 27692e14 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new e8d50b0f 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new d20e2632 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 0ced7b7b 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new bf51772f 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 8eedd8aa 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new e1a3c9f6 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 702c8a9c 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new aee53617 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 9c012035 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new dae141df 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 252dbf42 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 05a4c12b 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a08b15c6 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 95b14cc0 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new c1de9ba4 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new e355489c 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 3b95fc7f 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 337589fe 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 0f2c0408 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 509dd8ff 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new da370ad0 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 55fd8215 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new d4205582 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 6f2ef94b 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new be661392 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 5f10c7ab 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 13c066a1 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 025c47b9 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 2f5e34f8 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new da50e948 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 473aaf3d 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 496e7311 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 25b3b3b4 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 5cb6f4f9 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new a919100e 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 3b7bcc92 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 495e7021 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 0dc9baad 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e23b816f 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 56d3f2f6 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new ee9f72be 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new dee1a2dd 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d2ff5abf 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 4ec6035d 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 6da86229 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new a9c3c1fb 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new c58fb487 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new ac421d7a 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new baa4cb09 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new cadd96fc onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 894704d3 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 65ed8a3e onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 7b53ac69 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 9bd41d95 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d82a12d1 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 074efe4a onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e667e3d8 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 99fc9570 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 4642c65e onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (1a3a6d2c) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 107 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[binutils-gdb] branch master updated (093da43d2ad -> 8e032233a01)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. unknown user pushed a change to branch master in repository binutils-gdb. from 093da43d2ad gdb, breakpoint: add a destructor to the watchpoint struct new bcafd1c19e6 Use gdb::checked_static_cast for watchpoints new 01bccc56af0 Use gdb::checked_static_cast for tracepoints new 6a9196a65f1 Use gdb::checked_static_cast for code_breakpoint new 8e032233a01 Use gdb::checked_static_cast for catchpoints The 4 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: gdb/ada-lang.c | 2 +- gdb/break-catch-sig.c | 10 +- gdb/break-catch-syscall.c | 4 +- gdb/breakpoint.c | 339 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- gdb/elfread.c | 2 +- gdb/guile/scm-breakpoint.c | 3 +- gdb/mi/mi-cmd-break.c | 9 +- gdb/python/py-breakpoint.c | 3 +- gdb/remote.c | 11 +- gdb/target-debug.h | 2 + gdb/target-delegates.c | 16 +-- gdb/target.c | 2 +- gdb/target.h | 4 +- gdb/tracefile-tfile.c | 4 +- gdb/tracepoint.c | 25 ++-- gdb/tracepoint.h | 4 +- 16 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 216 deletions(-) -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 updated (375bde12b -> 1efb38116)

by git＠git.linaro.org

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-arm-lts-defconfig] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-arm-lts-defconfig updated (e328896 -> b4d2992)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-arm-lts-defconfig in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-arm-lts-defconfig. from e328896 onsuccess: #57: boot: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new b4d2992 onsuccess: #58: boot: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] The 1 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2340 -> 2296 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2612 -> 2608 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27580 -> 27464 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17768 -> 17588 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 92356 -> 92312 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 71640 -> 71424 bytes 05-build_abe-qemu/console.log.xz | Bin 33884 -> 33204 bytes 05-build_abe-qemu/make-qemu.log.xz | Bin 22668 -> 22068 bytes 06-build_linux/console.log.xz | Bin 3636 -> 3608 bytes 07-boot_linux/console.log.xz | Bin 5648 -> 5660 bytes 08-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 1228 -> 1204 bytes git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/qemu_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/notify-full.log | 283 +++++++++++------------------ jenkins/notify-init.log | 106 +++++------ jenkins/rewrite.log | 18 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 6 +- manifest.sh | 4 +- notify/jira/comment-template.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 48 +++-- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- 23 files changed, 188 insertions(+), 289 deletions(-) -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO updated (31516975a -> ddd1ddaad)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O2_LTO. discards 31516975a onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 1d6f8b29c onsuccess: #81: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards fbebb7254 onsuccess: #80: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 45eb54aee onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 1aae4e5b4 onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 69af21fc8 onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8bb5c7771 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e17726649 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ff64ed7d6 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 799bddda8 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 98b1849e8 onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8761437b8 onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 7183b1456 onsuccess: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 7823a72ea onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 559ba0788 onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 686ed3cf3 onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 038a4a4e6 78: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 08ee0c8bd 77: force: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards cd153f4f0 76: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d0856119d 75: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d70a66942 74: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f7048d486 73: force: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 86991e425 72: force: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 67c79f329 71: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 43e313540 70: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ee468541a 69: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 2752e6009 68: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 6d64f947c 67: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 84f1b6d81 66: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards cd0156bfb 65: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c04f98451 64: force: #20: milc_base.default [...] discards 241c33b9c 63: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f8d84c14a 62: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards b073813c4 61: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e1fa8c099 60: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 3d54675da 59: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 4f11419a5 58: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 82eb0467d 57: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards ce27e2fb5 56: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 957ea7654 55: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 68a87841b 54: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 4c6b527ea 53: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 179f1cc83 52: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 968c6eed1 51: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 3f378c402 onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] new 670dfb7a4 52: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new e0be2e9e7 53: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 5cc38a58a 54: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new a3c7718e0 55: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new a82d9e6a6 56: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 49b2c3130 57: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 17b85a748 58: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new ce9cd13a2 59: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7de267339 60: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new fd27ce998 61: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 1674a6065 62: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new efdfdaa70 63: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 71483f8c9 64: force: #20: milc_base.default [...] new debe6163f 65: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a1d85d2c5 66: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 6562a1ac7 67: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e58c11136 68: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b65c004d3 69: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new c13c47770 70: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c197d71ef 71: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 35685f9c3 72: force: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new bdb3f2598 73: force: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e7d4d9641 74: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c6ca2f7fa 75: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 41d1de780 76: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e052ed11f 77: force: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6bb1b6498 78: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 4867196ed onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 66996e653 onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 94b0d2db0 onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 23ae55d39 onsuccess: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 2cf762567 onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 5882b2c5e onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 7091dbc5a onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 0ad4dd63f onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new b8cbd3334 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 96344c07f onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new adca3a4e9 onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a7000ad22 onsuccess: #76: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 79ccb1cd9 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 57c099dce onsuccess: #80: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d964c65fb onsuccess: #81: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ddd1ddaad onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this: * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (31516975a) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...] You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B. Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever. The 44 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

[gcc] branch master updated (bf6b107e2a3 -> 1560cc94e8a)

by git＠git.linaro.org

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. unknown user pushed a change to branch master in repository gcc. from bf6b107e2a3 New early __builtin_unreachable processing. new 1560cc94e8a c++: inherited default constructor [CWG2799] The 1 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: gcc/cp/class.cc | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/inh-ctor38.C | 19 +++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/inh-ctor38.C -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository.

1 year, 11 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

Tcwg-commits September 2023