On 5/13/2026 9:17 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.88 release. There are 202 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 15 May 2026 15:37:24 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.88-rc2... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli florian.fainelli@broadcom.com
perf for MIPS fails, largely due because it assumes newer toolchain kernel headers than what I am building with, which we hit with the following build error:
trace/beauty/fcntl.c: In function 'syscall_arg__scnprintf_fcntl_arg': trace/beauty/fcntl.c:96:13: error: 'F_GET_RW_HINT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'F_GETOWN'? cmd == F_GET_RW_HINT || cmd == F_SET_RW_HINT || ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ F_GETOWN trace/beauty/fcntl.c:96:13: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in trace/beauty/fcntl.c:96:37: error: 'F_SET_RW_HINT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'F_SETOWN'? cmd == F_GET_RW_HINT || cmd == F_SET_RW_HINT || ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ F_SETOWN trace/beauty/fcntl.c:97:13: error: 'F_GET_FILE_RW_HINT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'F_GETOWNER_UIDS'? cmd == F_GET_FILE_RW_HINT || cmd == F_SET_FILE_RW_HINT) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ F_GETOWNER_UIDS trace/beauty/fcntl.c:97:42: error: 'F_SET_FILE_RW_HINT' undeclared (first use in this function) cmd == F_GET_FILE_RW_HINT || cmd == F_SET_FILE_RW_HINT) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I will submit a fix upstream for this.