2 Aug
2026
2 Aug
'26
8:42 a.m.
On Sun, Aug 2, 2026 at 12:13 AM Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org wrote:
No, that was not intentional - part one got squashed into the part two backport by mistake on my end, which is also why the `lib` removal has no commit of its own to point at.
I can revert and re-do if there's interest in that?
I guess it depends if there is some advantage/clarity by doing so for the future for you, or maintainers, or people using the stable patches etc. -- for me it is fine either way :)
i.e. I mostly mentioned it because it seemed odd and other issues could be hiding, e.g. maybe a backporting script somewhere had a bug.
Cheers, Miguel