From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko(a)kernel.org>
BUG_ON() should not be used in the kernel code, unless there are
exceptional reasons to do so. Replace BUG_ON() with WARN() and
return.
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Fixes: b3811d36a3e7 ("KEYS: checking the input id parameters before finding asymmetric key")
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko(a)kernel.org>
---
crypto/asymmetric_keys/asymmetric_type.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/asymmetric_type.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/asymmetric_type.c
index 33e77d846caa..47cc88fa0fa7 100644
--- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/asymmetric_type.c
+++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/asymmetric_type.c
@@ -54,7 +54,10 @@ struct key *find_asymmetric_key(struct key *keyring,
char *req, *p;
int len;
- BUG_ON(!id_0 && !id_1);
+ if (!id_0 && !id_1) {
+ WARN(1, "All ID's are NULL\n");
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ }
if (id_0) {
lookup = id_0->data;
--
2.29.2
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
iio: ad5504: Fix setting power-down state
to my staging git tree which can be found at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git
in the staging-linus branch.
The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)
The patch will hopefully also be merged in Linus's tree for the
next -rc kernel release.
If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.
>From efd597b2839a9895e8a98fcb0b76d2f545802cd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars(a)metafoo.de>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 11:46:49 +0100
Subject: iio: ad5504: Fix setting power-down state
The power-down mask of the ad5504 is actually a power-up mask. Meaning if
a bit is set the corresponding channel is powered up and if it is not set
the channel is powered down.
The driver currently has this the wrong way around, resulting in the
channel being powered up when requested to be powered down and vice versa.
Fixes: 3bbbf150ffde ("staging:iio:dac:ad5504: Use strtobool for boolean values")
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars(a)metafoo.de>
Acked-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean(a)analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201209104649.5794-1-lars@metafoo.de
Cc: <Stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron(a)huawei.com>
---
drivers/iio/dac/ad5504.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5504.c b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5504.c
index 28921b62e642..e9297c25d4ef 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5504.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5504.c
@@ -187,9 +187,9 @@ static ssize_t ad5504_write_dac_powerdown(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
return ret;
if (pwr_down)
- st->pwr_down_mask |= (1 << chan->channel);
- else
st->pwr_down_mask &= ~(1 << chan->channel);
+ else
+ st->pwr_down_mask |= (1 << chan->channel);
ret = ad5504_spi_write(st, AD5504_ADDR_CTRL,
AD5504_DAC_PWRDWN_MODE(st->pwr_down_mode) |
--
2.30.0
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
iio: common: st_sensors: fix possible infinite loop in
to my staging git tree which can be found at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git
in the staging-linus branch.
The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)
The patch will hopefully also be merged in Linus's tree for the
next -rc kernel release.
If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.
>From 40c48fb79b9798954691f24b8ece1d3a7eb1b353 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo(a)kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:36:40 +0100
Subject: iio: common: st_sensors: fix possible infinite loop in
st_sensors_irq_thread
Return a boolean value in st_sensors_new_samples_available routine in
order to avoid an infinite loop in st_sensors_irq_thread if
stat_drdy.addr is not defined or stat_drdy read fails
Fixes: 90efe05562921 ("iio: st_sensors: harden interrupt handling")
Reported-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo(a)kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij(a)linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c9ec69ed349e7200c779fd7a5bf04c1aaa2817aa.16074381…
Cc: <Stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron(a)huawei.com>
---
.../common/st_sensors/st_sensors_trigger.c | 31 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_trigger.c b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_trigger.c
index 0507283bd4c1..2dbd2646e44e 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_trigger.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_trigger.c
@@ -23,35 +23,31 @@
* @sdata: Sensor data.
*
* returns:
- * 0 - no new samples available
- * 1 - new samples available
- * negative - error or unknown
+ * false - no new samples available or read error
+ * true - new samples available
*/
-static int st_sensors_new_samples_available(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
- struct st_sensor_data *sdata)
+static bool st_sensors_new_samples_available(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
+ struct st_sensor_data *sdata)
{
int ret, status;
/* How would I know if I can't check it? */
if (!sdata->sensor_settings->drdy_irq.stat_drdy.addr)
- return -EINVAL;
+ return true;
/* No scan mask, no interrupt */
if (!indio_dev->active_scan_mask)
- return 0;
+ return false;
ret = regmap_read(sdata->regmap,
sdata->sensor_settings->drdy_irq.stat_drdy.addr,
&status);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(sdata->dev, "error checking samples available\n");
- return ret;
+ return false;
}
- if (status & sdata->sensor_settings->drdy_irq.stat_drdy.mask)
- return 1;
-
- return 0;
+ return !!(status & sdata->sensor_settings->drdy_irq.stat_drdy.mask);
}
/**
@@ -180,9 +176,15 @@ int st_sensors_allocate_trigger(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
/* Tell the interrupt handler that we're dealing with edges */
if (irq_trig == IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING ||
- irq_trig == IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING)
+ irq_trig == IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING) {
+ if (!sdata->sensor_settings->drdy_irq.stat_drdy.addr) {
+ dev_err(&indio_dev->dev,
+ "edge IRQ not supported w/o stat register.\n");
+ err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ goto iio_trigger_free;
+ }
sdata->edge_irq = true;
- else
+ } else {
/*
* If we're not using edges (i.e. level interrupts) we
* just mask off the IRQ, handle one interrupt, then
@@ -190,6 +192,7 @@ int st_sensors_allocate_trigger(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
* interrupt handler top half again and start over.
*/
irq_trig |= IRQF_ONESHOT;
+ }
/*
* If the interrupt pin is Open Drain, by definition this
--
2.30.0