In psnet_open_pf_bar() and snet_open_vf_bar() a string later passed to
pcim_iomap_regions() is placed on the stack. Neither
pcim_iomap_regions() nor the functions it calls copy that string.
Should the string later ever be used, this, consequently, causes
undefined behavior since the stack frame will by then have disappeared.
Fix the bug by allocating the strings on the heap through
devm_kasprintf().
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # v6.3
Fixes: 51a8f9d7f587 ("virtio: vdpa: new SolidNET DPU driver.")
Reported-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet(a)wanadoo.fr>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/74e9109a-ac59-49e2-9b1d-d825c9c9f891@wanadoo.fr/
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner(a)redhat.com>
---
drivers/vdpa/solidrun/snet_main.c | 14 ++++++++++----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/solidrun/snet_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/solidrun/snet_main.c
index 99428a04068d..c8b74980dbd1 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/solidrun/snet_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/solidrun/snet_main.c
@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ static const struct vdpa_config_ops snet_config_ops = {
static int psnet_open_pf_bar(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct psnet *psnet)
{
- char name[50];
+ char *name;
int ret, i, mask = 0;
/* We don't know which BAR will be used to communicate..
* We will map every bar with len > 0.
@@ -573,7 +573,10 @@ static int psnet_open_pf_bar(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct psnet *psnet)
return -ENODEV;
}
- snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "psnet[%s]-bars", pci_name(pdev));
+ name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "psnet[%s]-bars", pci_name(pdev));
+ if (!name)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
ret = pcim_iomap_regions(pdev, mask, name);
if (ret) {
SNET_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request and map PCI BARs\n");
@@ -590,10 +593,13 @@ static int psnet_open_pf_bar(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct psnet *psnet)
static int snet_open_vf_bar(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct snet *snet)
{
- char name[50];
+ char *name;
int ret;
- snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "snet[%s]-bar", pci_name(pdev));
+ name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "snet[%s]-bars", pci_name(pdev));
+ if (!name)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
/* Request and map BAR */
ret = pcim_iomap_regions(pdev, BIT(snet->psnet->cfg.vf_bar), name);
if (ret) {
--
2.46.1
The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-4.19.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024101827-implosion-twilight-c8e1@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 4.19.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nico Boehr <nrb(a)linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 17:18:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: s390: gaccess: Check if guest address is in memslot
Previously, access_guest_page() did not check whether the given guest
address is inside of a memslot. This is not a problem, since
kvm_write_guest_page/kvm_read_guest_page return -EFAULT in this case.
However, -EFAULT is also returned when copy_to/from_user fails.
When emulating a guest instruction, the address being outside a memslot
usually means that an addressing exception should be injected into the
guest.
Failure in copy_to/from_user however indicates that something is wrong
in userspace and hence should be handled there.
To be able to distinguish these two cases, return PGM_ADDRESSING in
access_guest_page() when the guest address is outside guest memory. In
access_guest_real(), populate vcpu->arch.pgm.code such that
kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond() can be used in the caller for injecting into
the guest (if applicable).
Since this adds a new return value to access_guest_page(), we need to make
sure that other callers are not confused by the new positive return value.
There are the following users of access_guest_page():
- access_guest_with_key() does the checking itself (in
guest_range_to_gpas()), so this case should never happen. Even if, the
handling is set up properly.
- access_guest_real() just passes the return code to its callers, which
are:
- read_guest_real() - see below
- write_guest_real() - see below
There are the following users of read_guest_real():
- ar_translation() in gaccess.c which already returns PGM_*
- setup_apcb10(), setup_apcb00(), setup_apcb11() in vsie.c which always
return -EFAULT on read_guest_read() nonzero return - no change
- shadow_crycb(), handle_stfle() always present this as validity, this
could be handled better but doesn't change current behaviour - no change
There are the following users of write_guest_real():
- kvm_s390_store_status_unloaded() always returns -EFAULT on
write_guest_real() failure.
Fixes: 2293897805c2 ("KVM: s390: add architecture compliant guest access functions")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb(a)linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca(a)linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240917151904.74314-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja(a)linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca(a)linux.ibm.com>
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
index e65f597e3044..a688351f4ab5 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
@@ -828,6 +828,8 @@ static int access_guest_page(struct kvm *kvm, enum gacc_mode mode, gpa_t gpa,
const gfn_t gfn = gpa_to_gfn(gpa);
int rc;
+ if (!gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn))
+ return PGM_ADDRESSING;
if (mode == GACC_STORE)
rc = kvm_write_guest_page(kvm, gfn, data, offset, len);
else
@@ -985,6 +987,8 @@ int access_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra,
gra += fragment_len;
data += fragment_len;
}
+ if (rc > 0)
+ vcpu->arch.pgm.code = rc;
return rc;
}
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
index b320d12aa049..3fde45a151f2 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
@@ -405,11 +405,12 @@ int read_guest_abs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gpa, void *data,
* @len: number of bytes to copy
*
* Copy @len bytes from @data (kernel space) to @gra (guest real address).
- * It is up to the caller to ensure that the entire guest memory range is
- * valid memory before calling this function.
* Guest low address and key protection are not checked.
*
- * Returns zero on success or -EFAULT on error.
+ * Returns zero on success, -EFAULT when copying from @data failed, or
+ * PGM_ADRESSING in case @gra is outside a memslot. In this case, pgm check info
+ * is also stored to allow injecting into the guest (if applicable) using
+ * kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond().
*
* If an error occurs data may have been copied partially to guest memory.
*/
@@ -428,11 +429,12 @@ int write_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra, void *data,
* @len: number of bytes to copy
*
* Copy @len bytes from @gra (guest real address) to @data (kernel space).
- * It is up to the caller to ensure that the entire guest memory range is
- * valid memory before calling this function.
* Guest key protection is not checked.
*
- * Returns zero on success or -EFAULT on error.
+ * Returns zero on success, -EFAULT when copying to @data failed, or
+ * PGM_ADRESSING in case @gra is outside a memslot. In this case, pgm check info
+ * is also stored to allow injecting into the guest (if applicable) using
+ * kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond().
*
* If an error occurs data may have been copied partially to kernel space.
*/
The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024101826-gracious-singer-816f@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nico Boehr <nrb(a)linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 17:18:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: s390: gaccess: Check if guest address is in memslot
Previously, access_guest_page() did not check whether the given guest
address is inside of a memslot. This is not a problem, since
kvm_write_guest_page/kvm_read_guest_page return -EFAULT in this case.
However, -EFAULT is also returned when copy_to/from_user fails.
When emulating a guest instruction, the address being outside a memslot
usually means that an addressing exception should be injected into the
guest.
Failure in copy_to/from_user however indicates that something is wrong
in userspace and hence should be handled there.
To be able to distinguish these two cases, return PGM_ADDRESSING in
access_guest_page() when the guest address is outside guest memory. In
access_guest_real(), populate vcpu->arch.pgm.code such that
kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond() can be used in the caller for injecting into
the guest (if applicable).
Since this adds a new return value to access_guest_page(), we need to make
sure that other callers are not confused by the new positive return value.
There are the following users of access_guest_page():
- access_guest_with_key() does the checking itself (in
guest_range_to_gpas()), so this case should never happen. Even if, the
handling is set up properly.
- access_guest_real() just passes the return code to its callers, which
are:
- read_guest_real() - see below
- write_guest_real() - see below
There are the following users of read_guest_real():
- ar_translation() in gaccess.c which already returns PGM_*
- setup_apcb10(), setup_apcb00(), setup_apcb11() in vsie.c which always
return -EFAULT on read_guest_read() nonzero return - no change
- shadow_crycb(), handle_stfle() always present this as validity, this
could be handled better but doesn't change current behaviour - no change
There are the following users of write_guest_real():
- kvm_s390_store_status_unloaded() always returns -EFAULT on
write_guest_real() failure.
Fixes: 2293897805c2 ("KVM: s390: add architecture compliant guest access functions")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb(a)linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca(a)linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240917151904.74314-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja(a)linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca(a)linux.ibm.com>
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
index e65f597e3044..a688351f4ab5 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
@@ -828,6 +828,8 @@ static int access_guest_page(struct kvm *kvm, enum gacc_mode mode, gpa_t gpa,
const gfn_t gfn = gpa_to_gfn(gpa);
int rc;
+ if (!gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn))
+ return PGM_ADDRESSING;
if (mode == GACC_STORE)
rc = kvm_write_guest_page(kvm, gfn, data, offset, len);
else
@@ -985,6 +987,8 @@ int access_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra,
gra += fragment_len;
data += fragment_len;
}
+ if (rc > 0)
+ vcpu->arch.pgm.code = rc;
return rc;
}
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
index b320d12aa049..3fde45a151f2 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
@@ -405,11 +405,12 @@ int read_guest_abs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gpa, void *data,
* @len: number of bytes to copy
*
* Copy @len bytes from @data (kernel space) to @gra (guest real address).
- * It is up to the caller to ensure that the entire guest memory range is
- * valid memory before calling this function.
* Guest low address and key protection are not checked.
*
- * Returns zero on success or -EFAULT on error.
+ * Returns zero on success, -EFAULT when copying from @data failed, or
+ * PGM_ADRESSING in case @gra is outside a memslot. In this case, pgm check info
+ * is also stored to allow injecting into the guest (if applicable) using
+ * kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond().
*
* If an error occurs data may have been copied partially to guest memory.
*/
@@ -428,11 +429,12 @@ int write_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra, void *data,
* @len: number of bytes to copy
*
* Copy @len bytes from @gra (guest real address) to @data (kernel space).
- * It is up to the caller to ensure that the entire guest memory range is
- * valid memory before calling this function.
* Guest key protection is not checked.
*
- * Returns zero on success or -EFAULT on error.
+ * Returns zero on success, -EFAULT when copying to @data failed, or
+ * PGM_ADRESSING in case @gra is outside a memslot. In this case, pgm check info
+ * is also stored to allow injecting into the guest (if applicable) using
+ * kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond().
*
* If an error occurs data may have been copied partially to kernel space.
*/
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024101824-departure-oversight-aa1e@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nico Boehr <nrb(a)linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 17:18:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: s390: gaccess: Check if guest address is in memslot
Previously, access_guest_page() did not check whether the given guest
address is inside of a memslot. This is not a problem, since
kvm_write_guest_page/kvm_read_guest_page return -EFAULT in this case.
However, -EFAULT is also returned when copy_to/from_user fails.
When emulating a guest instruction, the address being outside a memslot
usually means that an addressing exception should be injected into the
guest.
Failure in copy_to/from_user however indicates that something is wrong
in userspace and hence should be handled there.
To be able to distinguish these two cases, return PGM_ADDRESSING in
access_guest_page() when the guest address is outside guest memory. In
access_guest_real(), populate vcpu->arch.pgm.code such that
kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond() can be used in the caller for injecting into
the guest (if applicable).
Since this adds a new return value to access_guest_page(), we need to make
sure that other callers are not confused by the new positive return value.
There are the following users of access_guest_page():
- access_guest_with_key() does the checking itself (in
guest_range_to_gpas()), so this case should never happen. Even if, the
handling is set up properly.
- access_guest_real() just passes the return code to its callers, which
are:
- read_guest_real() - see below
- write_guest_real() - see below
There are the following users of read_guest_real():
- ar_translation() in gaccess.c which already returns PGM_*
- setup_apcb10(), setup_apcb00(), setup_apcb11() in vsie.c which always
return -EFAULT on read_guest_read() nonzero return - no change
- shadow_crycb(), handle_stfle() always present this as validity, this
could be handled better but doesn't change current behaviour - no change
There are the following users of write_guest_real():
- kvm_s390_store_status_unloaded() always returns -EFAULT on
write_guest_real() failure.
Fixes: 2293897805c2 ("KVM: s390: add architecture compliant guest access functions")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb(a)linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca(a)linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240917151904.74314-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja(a)linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca(a)linux.ibm.com>
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
index e65f597e3044..a688351f4ab5 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
@@ -828,6 +828,8 @@ static int access_guest_page(struct kvm *kvm, enum gacc_mode mode, gpa_t gpa,
const gfn_t gfn = gpa_to_gfn(gpa);
int rc;
+ if (!gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn))
+ return PGM_ADDRESSING;
if (mode == GACC_STORE)
rc = kvm_write_guest_page(kvm, gfn, data, offset, len);
else
@@ -985,6 +987,8 @@ int access_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra,
gra += fragment_len;
data += fragment_len;
}
+ if (rc > 0)
+ vcpu->arch.pgm.code = rc;
return rc;
}
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
index b320d12aa049..3fde45a151f2 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
@@ -405,11 +405,12 @@ int read_guest_abs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gpa, void *data,
* @len: number of bytes to copy
*
* Copy @len bytes from @data (kernel space) to @gra (guest real address).
- * It is up to the caller to ensure that the entire guest memory range is
- * valid memory before calling this function.
* Guest low address and key protection are not checked.
*
- * Returns zero on success or -EFAULT on error.
+ * Returns zero on success, -EFAULT when copying from @data failed, or
+ * PGM_ADRESSING in case @gra is outside a memslot. In this case, pgm check info
+ * is also stored to allow injecting into the guest (if applicable) using
+ * kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond().
*
* If an error occurs data may have been copied partially to guest memory.
*/
@@ -428,11 +429,12 @@ int write_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra, void *data,
* @len: number of bytes to copy
*
* Copy @len bytes from @gra (guest real address) to @data (kernel space).
- * It is up to the caller to ensure that the entire guest memory range is
- * valid memory before calling this function.
* Guest key protection is not checked.
*
- * Returns zero on success or -EFAULT on error.
+ * Returns zero on success, -EFAULT when copying to @data failed, or
+ * PGM_ADRESSING in case @gra is outside a memslot. In this case, pgm check info
+ * is also stored to allow injecting into the guest (if applicable) using
+ * kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond().
*
* If an error occurs data may have been copied partially to kernel space.
*/
The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024101823-tractor-twitter-a318@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nico Boehr <nrb(a)linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 17:18:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: s390: gaccess: Check if guest address is in memslot
Previously, access_guest_page() did not check whether the given guest
address is inside of a memslot. This is not a problem, since
kvm_write_guest_page/kvm_read_guest_page return -EFAULT in this case.
However, -EFAULT is also returned when copy_to/from_user fails.
When emulating a guest instruction, the address being outside a memslot
usually means that an addressing exception should be injected into the
guest.
Failure in copy_to/from_user however indicates that something is wrong
in userspace and hence should be handled there.
To be able to distinguish these two cases, return PGM_ADDRESSING in
access_guest_page() when the guest address is outside guest memory. In
access_guest_real(), populate vcpu->arch.pgm.code such that
kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond() can be used in the caller for injecting into
the guest (if applicable).
Since this adds a new return value to access_guest_page(), we need to make
sure that other callers are not confused by the new positive return value.
There are the following users of access_guest_page():
- access_guest_with_key() does the checking itself (in
guest_range_to_gpas()), so this case should never happen. Even if, the
handling is set up properly.
- access_guest_real() just passes the return code to its callers, which
are:
- read_guest_real() - see below
- write_guest_real() - see below
There are the following users of read_guest_real():
- ar_translation() in gaccess.c which already returns PGM_*
- setup_apcb10(), setup_apcb00(), setup_apcb11() in vsie.c which always
return -EFAULT on read_guest_read() nonzero return - no change
- shadow_crycb(), handle_stfle() always present this as validity, this
could be handled better but doesn't change current behaviour - no change
There are the following users of write_guest_real():
- kvm_s390_store_status_unloaded() always returns -EFAULT on
write_guest_real() failure.
Fixes: 2293897805c2 ("KVM: s390: add architecture compliant guest access functions")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb(a)linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca(a)linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240917151904.74314-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja(a)linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca(a)linux.ibm.com>
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
index e65f597e3044..a688351f4ab5 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
@@ -828,6 +828,8 @@ static int access_guest_page(struct kvm *kvm, enum gacc_mode mode, gpa_t gpa,
const gfn_t gfn = gpa_to_gfn(gpa);
int rc;
+ if (!gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn))
+ return PGM_ADDRESSING;
if (mode == GACC_STORE)
rc = kvm_write_guest_page(kvm, gfn, data, offset, len);
else
@@ -985,6 +987,8 @@ int access_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra,
gra += fragment_len;
data += fragment_len;
}
+ if (rc > 0)
+ vcpu->arch.pgm.code = rc;
return rc;
}
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
index b320d12aa049..3fde45a151f2 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
@@ -405,11 +405,12 @@ int read_guest_abs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gpa, void *data,
* @len: number of bytes to copy
*
* Copy @len bytes from @data (kernel space) to @gra (guest real address).
- * It is up to the caller to ensure that the entire guest memory range is
- * valid memory before calling this function.
* Guest low address and key protection are not checked.
*
- * Returns zero on success or -EFAULT on error.
+ * Returns zero on success, -EFAULT when copying from @data failed, or
+ * PGM_ADRESSING in case @gra is outside a memslot. In this case, pgm check info
+ * is also stored to allow injecting into the guest (if applicable) using
+ * kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond().
*
* If an error occurs data may have been copied partially to guest memory.
*/
@@ -428,11 +429,12 @@ int write_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra, void *data,
* @len: number of bytes to copy
*
* Copy @len bytes from @gra (guest real address) to @data (kernel space).
- * It is up to the caller to ensure that the entire guest memory range is
- * valid memory before calling this function.
* Guest key protection is not checked.
*
- * Returns zero on success or -EFAULT on error.
+ * Returns zero on success, -EFAULT when copying to @data failed, or
+ * PGM_ADRESSING in case @gra is outside a memslot. In this case, pgm check info
+ * is also stored to allow injecting into the guest (if applicable) using
+ * kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond().
*
* If an error occurs data may have been copied partially to kernel space.
*/
Currently, the rproc "atomic_t power" variable is incremented during:
a. WPSS rproc auto boot.
b. AHB power on for ath11k.
During AHB power off (rmmod ath11k_ahb.ko), rproc_shutdown fails
to unload the WPSS firmware because the rproc->power value is '2',
causing the atomic_dec_and_test(&rproc->power) condition to fail.
Consequently, during AHB power on (insmod ath11k_ahb.ko),
QMI_WLANFW_HOST_CAP_REQ_V01 fails due to the host and firmware QMI
states being out of sync.
Fixes: 300ed425dfa9 ("remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_pas: Add SC7280 ADSP, CDSP & WPSS")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Balaji Pothunoori <quic_bpothuno(a)quicinc.com>
---
v2: updated commit text.
added Fixes/cc:stable tags.
drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
index ef82835e98a4..05963d7924df 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
@@ -1344,7 +1344,7 @@ static const struct adsp_data sc7280_wpss_resource = {
.crash_reason_smem = 626,
.firmware_name = "wpss.mdt",
.pas_id = 6,
- .auto_boot = true,
+ .auto_boot = false,
.proxy_pd_names = (char*[]){
"cx",
"mx",
--
2.34.1