The series contains several small patches to fix various
issues in the pinctrl driver for Armada 3700.
Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7(a)gmail.com>
---
Gabor Juhos (7):
pinctrl: armada-37xx: use correct OUTPUT_VAL register for GPIOs > 31
pinctrl: armada-37xx: propagate error from armada_37xx_gpio_direction_output()
pinctrl: armada-37xx: set GPIO output value before setting direction
pinctrl: armada-37xx: propagate error from armada_37xx_gpio_get()
pinctrl: armada-37xx: propagate error from armada_37xx_pmx_gpio_set_direction()
pinctrl: armada-37xx: propagate error from armada_37xx_gpio_get_direction()
pinctrl: armada-37xx: propagate error from armada_37xx_pmx_set_by_name()
drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 82f2b0b97b36ee3fcddf0f0780a9a0825d52fec3
change-id: 20250512-pinctrl-a37xx-fixes-98fabc45cb11
Best regards,
--
Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7(a)gmail.com>
V2: not to add extra read-back in vcn_v4_0_5_start as there is a
read-back already. New comment for better understanding.
On VCN v4.0.5 there is a race condition where the WPTR is not
updated after starting from idle when doorbell is used. The read-back
of regVCN_RB1_DB_CTRL register after written is to ensure the
doorbell_index is updated before it can work properly.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/12528
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David (Ming Qiang) Wu <David.Wu3(a)amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello(a)amd.com>
Tested-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello(a)amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher(a)amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v4_0_5.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v4_0_5.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v4_0_5.c
index ed00d35039c1..e55b76d71367 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v4_0_5.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v4_0_5.c
@@ -1034,6 +1034,10 @@ static int vcn_v4_0_5_start_dpg_mode(struct amdgpu_vcn_inst *vinst,
ring->doorbell_index << VCN_RB1_DB_CTRL__OFFSET__SHIFT |
VCN_RB1_DB_CTRL__EN_MASK);
+ /* Keeping one read-back to ensure all register writes are done, otherwise
+ * it may introduce race conditions */
+ RREG32_SOC15(VCN, inst_idx, regVCN_RB1_DB_CTRL);
+
return 0;
}
--
2.34.1
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg(a)intel.com>
[ Upstream commit 9ad7974856926129f190ffbe3beea78460b3b7cc ]
If it looks like there's another subframe in the A-MSDU
but the header isn't fully there, we can end up reading
data out of bounds, only to discard later. Make this a
bit more careful and check if the subframe header can
even be present.
Reported-by: syzbot+d050d437fe47d479d210(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://msgid.link/20240226203405.a731e2c95e38.I82ce7d8c0cc8970ce29d0a39fdc…
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg(a)intel.com>
[Minor conflict resolved due to code context change. And routine
ieee80211_is_valid_amsdu is introduced by commit fe4a6d2db3ba
("wifi: mac80211: implement support for yet another mesh A-MSDU format")
after 6.4.]
Signed-off-by: Jianqi Ren <jianqi.ren.cn(a)windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he(a)windriver.com>
---
Verified the build test
---
net/wireless/util.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/wireless/util.c b/net/wireless/util.c
index 6ebc6567b287..0fd48361e3e1 100644
--- a/net/wireless/util.c
+++ b/net/wireless/util.c
@@ -751,24 +751,27 @@ void ieee80211_amsdu_to_8023s(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sk_buff_head *list,
struct sk_buff *frame = NULL;
u16 ethertype;
u8 *payload;
- int offset = 0, remaining;
+ int offset = 0;
struct ethhdr eth;
bool reuse_frag = skb->head_frag && !skb_has_frag_list(skb);
bool reuse_skb = false;
bool last = false;
while (!last) {
+ int remaining = skb->len - offset;
unsigned int subframe_len;
int len;
u8 padding;
+ if (sizeof(eth) > remaining)
+ goto purge;
+
skb_copy_bits(skb, offset, ð, sizeof(eth));
len = ntohs(eth.h_proto);
subframe_len = sizeof(struct ethhdr) + len;
padding = (4 - subframe_len) & 0x3;
/* the last MSDU has no padding */
- remaining = skb->len - offset;
if (subframe_len > remaining)
goto purge;
/* mitigate A-MSDU aggregation injection attacks */
--
2.34.1
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com>
commit a0f0cf8341e34e5d2265bfd3a7ad68342da1e2aa upstream.
When using the flushoncommit mount option, during almost every transaction
commit we trigger a warning from __writeback_inodes_sb_nr():
$ cat fs/fs-writeback.c:
(...)
static void __writeback_inodes_sb_nr(struct super_block *sb, ...
{
(...)
WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount));
(...)
}
(...)
The trace produced in dmesg looks like the following:
[947.473890] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 930 at fs/fs-writeback.c:2610 __writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3
[947.481623] Modules linked in: nfsd nls_cp437 cifs asn1_decoder cifs_arc4 fscache cifs_md4 ipmi_ssif
[947.489571] CPU: 5 PID: 930 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted 95.16.3-srb-asrock-00001-g36437ad63879 #186
[947.497969] RIP: 0010:__writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3
[947.502097] Code: 24 10 4c 89 44 24 18 c6 (...)
[947.519760] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000777e10 EFLAGS: 00010246
[947.523818] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000963300 RCX: 0000000000000000
[947.529765] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000fa51 RDI: ffffc90000777e50
[947.535740] RBP: ffff888101628a90 R08: ffff888100955800 R09: ffff888100956000
[947.541701] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888100963488
[947.547645] R13: ffff888100963000 R14: ffff888112fb7200 R15: ffff888100963460
[947.553621] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88841fd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[947.560537] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[947.565122] CR2: 0000000008be50c4 CR3: 000000000220c000 CR4: 00000000001006e0
[947.571072] Call Trace:
[947.572354] <TASK>
[947.573266] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x1f1/0x998
[947.576785] ? start_transaction+0x3ab/0x44e
[947.579867] ? schedule_timeout+0x8a/0xdd
[947.582716] transaction_kthread+0xe9/0x156
[947.585721] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction.isra.0+0x407/0x407
[947.590104] kthread+0x131/0x139
[947.592168] ? set_kthread_struct+0x32/0x32
[947.595174] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[947.597561] </TASK>
[947.598553] ---[ end trace 644721052755541c ]---
This is because we started using writeback_inodes_sb() to flush delalloc
when committing a transaction (when using -o flushoncommit), in order to
avoid deadlocks with filesystem freeze operations. This change was made
by commit ce8ea7cc6eb313 ("btrfs: don't call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots
in flushoncommit"). After that change we started producing that warning,
and every now and then a user reports this since the warning happens too
often, it spams dmesg/syslog, and a user is unsure if this reflects any
problem that might compromise the filesystem's reliability.
We can not just lock the sb->s_umount semaphore before calling
writeback_inodes_sb(), because that would at least deadlock with
filesystem freezing, since at fs/super.c:freeze_super() sync_filesystem()
is called while we are holding that semaphore in write mode, and that can
trigger a transaction commit, resulting in a deadlock. It would also
trigger the same type of deadlock in the unmount path. Possibly, it could
also introduce some other locking dependencies that lockdep would report.
To fix this call try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() instead of
writeback_inodes_sb(), because that will try to read lock sb->s_umount
and then will only call writeback_inodes_sb() if it was able to lock it.
This is fine because the cases where it can't read lock sb->s_umount
are during a filesystem unmount or during a filesystem freeze - in those
cases sb->s_umount is write locked and sync_filesystem() is called, which
calls writeback_inodes_sb(). In other words, in all cases where we can't
take a read lock on sb->s_umount, writeback is already being triggered
elsewhere.
An alternative would be to call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() with a
number of pages different from LONG_MAX, for example matching the number
of delalloc bytes we currently have, in which case we would end up
starting all delalloc with filemap_fdatawrite_wbc() and not with an
async flush via filemap_flush() - that is only possible after the rather
recent commit e076ab2a2ca70a ("btrfs: shrink delalloc pages instead of
full inodes"). However that creates a whole new can of worms due to new
lock dependencies, which lockdep complains, like for example:
[ 8948.247280] ======================================================
[ 8948.247823] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 8948.248353] 5.17.0-rc1-btrfs-next-111 #1 Not tainted
[ 8948.248786] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 8948.249320] kworker/u16:18/933570 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 8948.249812] ffff9b3de1591690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs]
[ 8948.250638]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 8948.251140] ffff9b3e09c717d8 (&root->delalloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: start_delalloc_inodes+0x78/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 8948.252018]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 8948.252710]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 8948.253343]
-> #2 (&root->delalloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 8948.253950] __mutex_lock+0x90/0x900
[ 8948.254354] start_delalloc_inodes+0x78/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 8948.254859] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x194/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.255408] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x32f/0xc00 [btrfs]
[ 8948.255942] btrfs_mksubvol+0x380/0x570 [btrfs]
[ 8948.256406] btrfs_mksnapshot+0x81/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.256870] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x17f/0x190 [btrfs]
[ 8948.257413] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xbb/0x140 [btrfs]
[ 8948.257961] btrfs_ioctl+0x1196/0x3630 [btrfs]
[ 8948.258418] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
[ 8948.258793] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[ 8948.259146] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 8948.259709]
-> #1 (&fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 8948.260330] __mutex_lock+0x90/0x900
[ 8948.260692] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x97/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.261234] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x32f/0xc00 [btrfs]
[ 8948.261766] btrfs_set_free_space_cache_v1_active+0x38/0x60 [btrfs]
[ 8948.262379] btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0x119/0x180 [btrfs]
[ 8948.262909] open_ctree+0x1511/0x171e [btrfs]
[ 8948.263359] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [btrfs]
[ 8948.263863] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
[ 8948.264242] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
[ 8948.264594] vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0
[ 8948.265017] btrfs_mount+0x11d/0x3a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.265462] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
[ 8948.265851] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
[ 8948.266203] path_mount+0x2d4/0xbe0
[ 8948.266554] __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140
[ 8948.266940] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[ 8948.267300] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 8948.267790]
-> #0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
[ 8948.268322] __lock_acquire+0x12e8/0x2260
[ 8948.268733] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310
[ 8948.269092] start_transaction+0x44c/0x6e0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.269591] find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs]
[ 8948.270087] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x14b/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 8948.270588] cow_file_range+0x17e/0x490 [btrfs]
[ 8948.271051] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x345/0x7a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.271586] writepage_delalloc+0xb5/0x170 [btrfs]
[ 8948.272071] __extent_writepage+0x156/0x3c0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.272579] extent_write_cache_pages+0x263/0x460 [btrfs]
[ 8948.273113] extent_writepages+0x76/0x130 [btrfs]
[ 8948.273573] do_writepages+0xd2/0x1c0
[ 8948.273942] filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x68/0x90
[ 8948.274371] start_delalloc_inodes+0x17f/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 8948.274876] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x194/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.275417] flush_space+0x1f2/0x630 [btrfs]
[ 8948.275863] btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x108/0x1b0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.276438] process_one_work+0x252/0x5a0
[ 8948.276829] worker_thread+0x55/0x3b0
[ 8948.277189] kthread+0xf2/0x120
[ 8948.277506] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[ 8948.277868]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 8948.278548] Chain exists of:
sb_internal#2 --> &fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex --> &root->delalloc_mutex
[ 8948.279601] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 8948.280102] CPU0 CPU1
[ 8948.280508] ---- ----
[ 8948.280915] lock(&root->delalloc_mutex);
[ 8948.281271] lock(&fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex);
[ 8948.281915] lock(&root->delalloc_mutex);
[ 8948.282487] lock(sb_internal#2);
[ 8948.282800]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 8948.283333] 4 locks held by kworker/u16:18/933570:
[ 8948.283750] #0: ffff9b3dc00a9d48 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d2/0x5a0
[ 8948.284609] #1: ffffa90349dafe70 ((work_completion)(&fs_info->async_data_reclaim_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d2/0x5a0
[ 8948.285637] #2: ffff9b3e14db5040 (&fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x97/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.286674] #3: ffff9b3e09c717d8 (&root->delalloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: start_delalloc_inodes+0x78/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 8948.287596]
stack backtrace:
[ 8948.287975] CPU: 3 PID: 933570 Comm: kworker/u16:18 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc1-btrfs-next-111 #1
[ 8948.288677] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 8948.289649] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs]
[ 8948.290298] Call Trace:
[ 8948.290517] <TASK>
[ 8948.290700] dump_stack_lvl+0x59/0x73
[ 8948.291026] check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110
[ 8948.291375] ? start_transaction+0x228/0x6e0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.291826] __lock_acquire+0x12e8/0x2260
[ 8948.292241] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310
[ 8948.292714] ? find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs]
[ 8948.293241] ? lock_is_held_type+0xea/0x140
[ 8948.293601] start_transaction+0x44c/0x6e0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.294055] ? find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs]
[ 8948.294518] find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs]
[ 8948.294957] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40
[ 8948.295312] ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x124/0x290 [btrfs]
[ 8948.295813] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x14b/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 8948.296270] cow_file_range+0x17e/0x490 [btrfs]
[ 8948.296691] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x345/0x7a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.297175] ? find_lock_delalloc_range+0x247/0x270 [btrfs]
[ 8948.297678] writepage_delalloc+0xb5/0x170 [btrfs]
[ 8948.298123] __extent_writepage+0x156/0x3c0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.298570] extent_write_cache_pages+0x263/0x460 [btrfs]
[ 8948.299061] extent_writepages+0x76/0x130 [btrfs]
[ 8948.299495] do_writepages+0xd2/0x1c0
[ 8948.299817] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd/0x110
[ 8948.300160] ? lock_release+0x155/0x4a0
[ 8948.300494] filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x68/0x90
[ 8948.300874] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0
[ 8948.301243] start_delalloc_inodes+0x17f/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 8948.301706] ? lock_release+0x155/0x4a0
[ 8948.302055] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x194/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.302564] flush_space+0x1f2/0x630 [btrfs]
[ 8948.302970] btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x108/0x1b0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.303510] process_one_work+0x252/0x5a0
[ 8948.303860] ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0
[ 8948.304221] worker_thread+0x55/0x3b0
[ 8948.304543] ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0
[ 8948.304904] kthread+0xf2/0x120
[ 8948.305184] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
[ 8948.305598] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[ 8948.305921] </TASK>
It all comes from the fact that btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() takes the
delalloc_root_mutex, in the transaction commit path we are holding a
read lock on one of the superblock's freeze semaphores (via
sb_start_intwrite()), the async reclaim task can also do a call to
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), which ends up triggering writeback with
calls to filemap_fdatawrite_wbc(), resulting in extent allocation which
in turn can call btrfs_start_transaction(), which will result in taking
the freeze semaphore via sb_start_intwrite(), forming a nasty dependency
on all those locks which can be taken in different orders by different
code paths.
So just adopt the simple approach of calling try_to_writeback_inodes_sb()
at btrfs_start_delalloc_flush().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20220130005258.GA7465@cuci.nl/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/43acc426-d683-d1b6-729d-c6bc4a2fff4d@gm…
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6833930a-08d7-6fbc-0141-eb9cdfd6bb4d@gm…
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20190322041731.GF16651@hungrycats.org/
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov(a)fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com>
[ add more link reports ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com>
[Minor context change fixed]
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yang <Zhi.Yang(a)windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he(a)windriver.com>
---
Build test passed.
---
fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
index 21a5a963c70e..8c0703f8037b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
@@ -2021,16 +2021,24 @@ static inline int btrfs_start_delalloc_flush(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
/*
- * We use writeback_inodes_sb here because if we used
+ * We use try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() here because if we used
* btrfs_start_delalloc_roots we would deadlock with fs freeze.
* Currently are holding the fs freeze lock, if we do an async flush
* we'll do btrfs_join_transaction() and deadlock because we need to
* wait for the fs freeze lock. Using the direct flushing we benefit
* from already being in a transaction and our join_transaction doesn't
* have to re-take the fs freeze lock.
+ *
+ * Note that try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() will only trigger writeback
+ * if it can read lock sb->s_umount. It will always be able to lock it,
+ * except when the filesystem is being unmounted or being frozen, but in
+ * those cases sync_filesystem() is called, which results in calling
+ * writeback_inodes_sb() while holding a write lock on sb->s_umount.
+ * Note that we don't call writeback_inodes_sb() directly, because it
+ * will emit a warning if sb->s_umount is not locked.
*/
if (btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, FLUSHONCOMMIT)) {
- writeback_inodes_sb(fs_info->sb, WB_REASON_SYNC);
+ try_to_writeback_inodes_sb(fs_info->sb, WB_REASON_SYNC);
} else {
struct btrfs_pending_snapshot *pending;
struct list_head *head = &trans->transaction->pending_snapshots;
--
2.34.1
The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x ab00ddd802f80e31fc9639c652d736fe3913feae
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025051243-handprint-impulse-c20a@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From ab00ddd802f80e31fc9639c652d736fe3913feae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang(a)linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:36:45 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/mm: compaction_test: support platform with huge
mount of memory
When running mm selftest to verify mm patches, 'compaction_test' case
failed on an x86 server with 1TB memory. And the root cause is that it
has too much free memory than what the test supports.
The test case tries to allocate 100000 huge pages, which is about 200 GB
for that x86 server, and when it succeeds, it expects it's large than 1/3
of 80% of the free memory in system. This logic only works for platform
with 750 GB ( 200 / (1/3) / 80% ) or less free memory, and may raise false
alarm for others.
Fix it by changing the fixed page number to self-adjustable number
according to the real number of free memory.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250423103645.2758-1-feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com
Fixes: bd67d5c15cc1 ("Test compaction of mlocked memory")
Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang(a)linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain(a)arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang(a)linux.alibaba.com>
Tested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang(a)inux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah(a)kernel.org>
Cc: Sri Jayaramappa <sjayaram(a)akamai.com>
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c
index 2c3a0eb6b22d..9bc4591c7b16 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c
@@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ int check_compaction(unsigned long mem_free, unsigned long hugepage_size,
int compaction_index = 0;
char nr_hugepages[20] = {0};
char init_nr_hugepages[24] = {0};
+ char target_nr_hugepages[24] = {0};
+ int slen;
snprintf(init_nr_hugepages, sizeof(init_nr_hugepages),
"%lu", initial_nr_hugepages);
@@ -106,11 +108,18 @@ int check_compaction(unsigned long mem_free, unsigned long hugepage_size,
goto out;
}
- /* Request a large number of huge pages. The Kernel will allocate
- as much as it can */
- if (write(fd, "100000", (6*sizeof(char))) != (6*sizeof(char))) {
- ksft_print_msg("Failed to write 100000 to /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages: %s\n",
- strerror(errno));
+ /*
+ * Request huge pages for about half of the free memory. The Kernel
+ * will allocate as much as it can, and we expect it will get at least 1/3
+ */
+ nr_hugepages_ul = mem_free / hugepage_size / 2;
+ snprintf(target_nr_hugepages, sizeof(target_nr_hugepages),
+ "%lu", nr_hugepages_ul);
+
+ slen = strlen(target_nr_hugepages);
+ if (write(fd, target_nr_hugepages, slen) != slen) {
+ ksft_print_msg("Failed to write %lu to /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages: %s\n",
+ nr_hugepages_ul, strerror(errno));
goto close_fd;
}
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 94cff94634e506a4a44684bee1875d2dbf782722
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025051257-skater-skeleton-9a3d@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 94cff94634e506a4a44684bee1875d2dbf782722 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy(a)linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 15:31:16 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] clocksource/i8253: Use raw_spinlock_irqsave() in
clockevent_i8253_disable()
On x86 during boot, clockevent_i8253_disable() can be invoked via
x86_late_time_init -> hpet_time_init() -> pit_timer_init() which happens
with enabled interrupts.
If some of the old i8253 hardware is actually used then lockdep will notice
that i8253_lock is used in hard interrupt context. This causes lockdep to
complain because it observed the lock being acquired with interrupts
enabled and in hard interrupt context.
Make clockevent_i8253_disable() acquire the lock with
raw_spinlock_irqsave() to cure this.
[ tglx: Massage change log and use guard() ]
Fixes: c8c4076723dac ("x86/timer: Skip PIT initialization on modern chipsets")
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy(a)linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de>
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250404133116.p-XRWJXf@linutronix.de
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/i8253.c b/drivers/clocksource/i8253.c
index 39f7c2d736d1..b603c25f3dfa 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/i8253.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/i8253.c
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ int __init clocksource_i8253_init(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_CLKEVT_I8253
void clockevent_i8253_disable(void)
{
- raw_spin_lock(&i8253_lock);
+ guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&i8253_lock);
/*
* Writing the MODE register should stop the counter, according to
@@ -132,8 +132,6 @@ void clockevent_i8253_disable(void)
outb_p(0, PIT_CH0);
outb_p(0x30, PIT_MODE);
-
- raw_spin_unlock(&i8253_lock);
}
static int pit_shutdown(struct clock_event_device *evt)
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg(a)intel.com>
[ Upstream commit 9ad7974856926129f190ffbe3beea78460b3b7cc ]
If it looks like there's another subframe in the A-MSDU
but the header isn't fully there, we can end up reading
data out of bounds, only to discard later. Make this a
bit more careful and check if the subframe header can
even be present.
Reported-by: syzbot+d050d437fe47d479d210(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://msgid.link/20240226203405.a731e2c95e38.I82ce7d8c0cc8970ce29d0a39fdc…
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg(a)intel.com>
[Minor conflict resolved due to code context change. And routine
ieee80211_is_valid_amsdu is introduced by commit fe4a6d2db3ba
("wifi: mac80211: implement support for yet another mesh A-MSDU format")
after 6.4.]
Signed-off-by: Jianqi Ren <jianqi.ren.cn(a)windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he(a)windriver.com>
---
Verified the build test
---
net/wireless/util.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/wireless/util.c b/net/wireless/util.c
index 6ebc6567b287..0fd48361e3e1 100644
--- a/net/wireless/util.c
+++ b/net/wireless/util.c
@@ -751,24 +751,27 @@ void ieee80211_amsdu_to_8023s(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sk_buff_head *list,
struct sk_buff *frame = NULL;
u16 ethertype;
u8 *payload;
- int offset = 0, remaining;
+ int offset = 0;
struct ethhdr eth;
bool reuse_frag = skb->head_frag && !skb_has_frag_list(skb);
bool reuse_skb = false;
bool last = false;
while (!last) {
+ int remaining = skb->len - offset;
unsigned int subframe_len;
int len;
u8 padding;
+ if (sizeof(eth) > remaining)
+ goto purge;
+
skb_copy_bits(skb, offset, ð, sizeof(eth));
len = ntohs(eth.h_proto);
subframe_len = sizeof(struct ethhdr) + len;
padding = (4 - subframe_len) & 0x3;
/* the last MSDU has no padding */
- remaining = skb->len - offset;
if (subframe_len > remaining)
goto purge;
/* mitigate A-MSDU aggregation injection attacks */
--
2.34.1