This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
usb: phy: isp1301: Add OF device ID table
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum…
The filename of the patch is:
usb-phy-isp1301-add-of-device-id-table.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Mon Dec 18 14:12:34 CET 2017
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier(a)osg.samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 15:23:22 -0300
Subject: usb: phy: isp1301: Add OF device ID table
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier(a)osg.samsung.com>
[ Upstream commit fd567653bdb908009b650f079bfd4b63169e2ac4 ]
The driver doesn't have a struct of_device_id table but supported devices
are registered via Device Trees. This is working on the assumption that a
I2C device registered via OF will always match a legacy I2C device ID and
that the MODALIAS reported will always be of the form i2c:<device>.
But this could change in the future so the correct approach is to have an
OF device ID table if the devices are registered via OF.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier(a)osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin(a)verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/usb/phy/phy-isp1301.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-isp1301.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-isp1301.c
@@ -33,6 +33,12 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id isp130
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, isp1301_id);
+static const struct of_device_id isp1301_of_match[] = {
+ {.compatible = "nxp,isp1301" },
+ { },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, isp1301_of_match);
+
static struct i2c_client *isp1301_i2c_client;
static int __isp1301_write(struct isp1301 *isp, u8 reg, u8 value, u8 clear)
@@ -130,6 +136,7 @@ static int isp1301_remove(struct i2c_cli
static struct i2c_driver isp1301_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = DRV_NAME,
+ .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(isp1301_of_match),
},
.probe = isp1301_probe,
.remove = isp1301_remove,
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from javier(a)osg.samsung.com are
queue-4.9/usb-phy-isp1301-add-of-device-id-table.patch
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
udf: Avoid overflow when session starts at large offset
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum…
The filename of the patch is:
udf-avoid-overflow-when-session-starts-at-large-offset.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Mon Dec 18 14:12:35 CET 2017
From: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 11:38:11 +0200
Subject: udf: Avoid overflow when session starts at large offset
From: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz>
[ Upstream commit abdc0eb06964fe1d2fea6dd1391b734d0590365d ]
When session starts beyond offset 2^31 the arithmetics in
udf_check_vsd() would overflow. Make sure the computation is done in
large enough type.
Reported-by: Cezary Sliwa <sliwa(a)ifpan.edu.pl>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin(a)verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/udf/super.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/udf/super.c
+++ b/fs/udf/super.c
@@ -710,7 +710,7 @@ static loff_t udf_check_vsd(struct super
else
sectorsize = sb->s_blocksize;
- sector += (sbi->s_session << sb->s_blocksize_bits);
+ sector += (((loff_t)sbi->s_session) << sb->s_blocksize_bits);
udf_debug("Starting at sector %u (%ld byte sectors)\n",
(unsigned int)(sector >> sb->s_blocksize_bits),
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jack(a)suse.cz are
queue-4.9/writeback-fix-memory-leak-in-wb_queue_work.patch
queue-4.9/mm-handle-0-flags-in-_calc_vm_trans-macro.patch
queue-4.9/udf-avoid-overflow-when-session-starts-at-large-offset.patch
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
tty: fix data race in tty_ldisc_ref_wait()
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum…
The filename of the patch is:
tty-fix-data-race-in-tty_ldisc_ref_wait.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Mon Dec 18 14:12:34 CET 2017
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov(a)google.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2017 13:46:12 +0100
Subject: tty: fix data race in tty_ldisc_ref_wait()
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov(a)google.com>
[ Upstream commit a4a3e061149f09c075f108b6f1cf04d9739a6bc2 ]
tty_ldisc_ref_wait() checks tty->ldisc under tty->ldisc_sem.
But if ldisc==NULL it releases them sem and reloads
tty->ldisc without holding the sem. This is wrong and
can lead to returning non-NULL ldisc without protection.
Don't reload tty->ldisc second time.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov(a)google.com>
Cc: syzkaller(a)googlegroups.com
Cc: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter(a)hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes(a)lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin(a)verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -271,10 +271,13 @@ const struct file_operations tty_ldiscs_
struct tty_ldisc *tty_ldisc_ref_wait(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
+ struct tty_ldisc *ld;
+
ldsem_down_read(&tty->ldisc_sem, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
- if (!tty->ldisc)
+ ld = tty->ldisc;
+ if (!ld)
ldsem_up_read(&tty->ldisc_sem);
- return tty->ldisc;
+ return ld;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tty_ldisc_ref_wait);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from dvyukov(a)google.com are
queue-4.9/tty-fix-data-race-in-tty_ldisc_ref_wait.patch
queue-4.9/kvm-nvmx-do-not-warn-when-msr-bitmap-address-is-not-backed.patch
queue-4.9/userfaultfd-shmem-__do_fault-requires-vm_fault_nopage.patch
queue-4.9/tty-don-t-panic-on-oom-in-tty_set_ldisc.patch
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
tty: don't panic on OOM in tty_set_ldisc()
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum…
The filename of the patch is:
tty-don-t-panic-on-oom-in-tty_set_ldisc.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Mon Dec 18 14:12:34 CET 2017
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov(a)google.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2017 14:55:19 +0100
Subject: tty: don't panic on OOM in tty_set_ldisc()
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov(a)google.com>
[ Upstream commit 5362544bebe85071188dd9e479b5a5040841c895 ]
If tty_ldisc_open() fails in tty_set_ldisc(), it tries to go back
to the old discipline or N_TTY. But that can fail as well, in such
case it panics. This is not a graceful way to handle OOM.
Leave ldisc==NULL if all attempts fail instead.
Also use existing tty_ldisc_reinit() helper function instead of
tty_ldisc_restore(). Also don't WARN/BUG in tty_ldisc_reinit()
if N_TTY fails, which would have the same net effect of bringing
kernel down on OOM. Instead print a single line message about
what has happened.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov(a)google.com>
Cc: syzkaller(a)googlegroups.com
Cc: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter(a)hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes(a)lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin(a)verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c | 85 +++++++++---------------------------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -489,41 +489,6 @@ static void tty_ldisc_close(struct tty_s
}
/**
- * tty_ldisc_restore - helper for tty ldisc change
- * @tty: tty to recover
- * @old: previous ldisc
- *
- * Restore the previous line discipline or N_TTY when a line discipline
- * change fails due to an open error
- */
-
-static void tty_ldisc_restore(struct tty_struct *tty, struct tty_ldisc *old)
-{
- struct tty_ldisc *new_ldisc;
- int r;
-
- /* There is an outstanding reference here so this is safe */
- old = tty_ldisc_get(tty, old->ops->num);
- WARN_ON(IS_ERR(old));
- tty->ldisc = old;
- tty_set_termios_ldisc(tty, old->ops->num);
- if (tty_ldisc_open(tty, old) < 0) {
- tty_ldisc_put(old);
- /* This driver is always present */
- new_ldisc = tty_ldisc_get(tty, N_TTY);
- if (IS_ERR(new_ldisc))
- panic("n_tty: get");
- tty->ldisc = new_ldisc;
- tty_set_termios_ldisc(tty, N_TTY);
- r = tty_ldisc_open(tty, new_ldisc);
- if (r < 0)
- panic("Couldn't open N_TTY ldisc for "
- "%s --- error %d.",
- tty_name(tty), r);
- }
-}
-
-/**
* tty_set_ldisc - set line discipline
* @tty: the terminal to set
* @ldisc: the line discipline
@@ -536,12 +501,7 @@ static void tty_ldisc_restore(struct tty
int tty_set_ldisc(struct tty_struct *tty, int disc)
{
- int retval;
- struct tty_ldisc *old_ldisc, *new_ldisc;
-
- new_ldisc = tty_ldisc_get(tty, disc);
- if (IS_ERR(new_ldisc))
- return PTR_ERR(new_ldisc);
+ int retval, old_disc;
tty_lock(tty);
retval = tty_ldisc_lock(tty, 5 * HZ);
@@ -554,7 +514,8 @@ int tty_set_ldisc(struct tty_struct *tty
}
/* Check the no-op case */
- if (tty->ldisc->ops->num == disc)
+ old_disc = tty->ldisc->ops->num;
+ if (old_disc == disc)
goto out;
if (test_bit(TTY_HUPPED, &tty->flags)) {
@@ -563,34 +524,25 @@ int tty_set_ldisc(struct tty_struct *tty
goto out;
}
- old_ldisc = tty->ldisc;
-
- /* Shutdown the old discipline. */
- tty_ldisc_close(tty, old_ldisc);
-
- /* Now set up the new line discipline. */
- tty->ldisc = new_ldisc;
- tty_set_termios_ldisc(tty, disc);
-
- retval = tty_ldisc_open(tty, new_ldisc);
+ retval = tty_ldisc_reinit(tty, disc);
if (retval < 0) {
/* Back to the old one or N_TTY if we can't */
- tty_ldisc_put(new_ldisc);
- tty_ldisc_restore(tty, old_ldisc);
+ if (tty_ldisc_reinit(tty, old_disc) < 0) {
+ pr_err("tty: TIOCSETD failed, reinitializing N_TTY\n");
+ if (tty_ldisc_reinit(tty, N_TTY) < 0) {
+ /* At this point we have tty->ldisc == NULL. */
+ pr_err("tty: reinitializing N_TTY failed\n");
+ }
+ }
}
- if (tty->ldisc->ops->num != old_ldisc->ops->num && tty->ops->set_ldisc) {
+ if (tty->ldisc && tty->ldisc->ops->num != old_disc &&
+ tty->ops->set_ldisc) {
down_read(&tty->termios_rwsem);
tty->ops->set_ldisc(tty);
up_read(&tty->termios_rwsem);
}
- /* At this point we hold a reference to the new ldisc and a
- reference to the old ldisc, or we hold two references to
- the old ldisc (if it was restored as part of error cleanup
- above). In either case, releasing a single reference from
- the old ldisc is correct. */
- new_ldisc = old_ldisc;
out:
tty_ldisc_unlock(tty);
@@ -598,7 +550,6 @@ out:
already running */
tty_buffer_restart_work(tty->port);
err:
- tty_ldisc_put(new_ldisc); /* drop the extra reference */
tty_unlock(tty);
return retval;
}
@@ -659,10 +610,8 @@ int tty_ldisc_reinit(struct tty_struct *
int retval;
ld = tty_ldisc_get(tty, disc);
- if (IS_ERR(ld)) {
- BUG_ON(disc == N_TTY);
+ if (IS_ERR(ld))
return PTR_ERR(ld);
- }
if (tty->ldisc) {
tty_ldisc_close(tty, tty->ldisc);
@@ -674,10 +623,8 @@ int tty_ldisc_reinit(struct tty_struct *
tty_set_termios_ldisc(tty, disc);
retval = tty_ldisc_open(tty, tty->ldisc);
if (retval) {
- if (!WARN_ON(disc == N_TTY)) {
- tty_ldisc_put(tty->ldisc);
- tty->ldisc = NULL;
- }
+ tty_ldisc_put(tty->ldisc);
+ tty->ldisc = NULL;
}
return retval;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from dvyukov(a)google.com are
queue-4.9/tty-fix-data-race-in-tty_ldisc_ref_wait.patch
queue-4.9/kvm-nvmx-do-not-warn-when-msr-bitmap-address-is-not-backed.patch
queue-4.9/userfaultfd-shmem-__do_fault-requires-vm_fault_nopage.patch
queue-4.9/tty-don-t-panic-on-oom-in-tty_set_ldisc.patch
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
thermal/drivers/step_wise: Fix temperature regulation misbehavior
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum…
The filename of the patch is:
thermal-drivers-step_wise-fix-temperature-regulation-misbehavior.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Mon Dec 18 14:12:35 CET 2017
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano(a)linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 19:05:58 +0200
Subject: thermal/drivers/step_wise: Fix temperature regulation misbehavior
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano(a)linaro.org>
[ Upstream commit 07209fcf33542c1ff1e29df2dbdf8f29cdaacb10 ]
There is a particular situation when the cooling device is cpufreq and the heat
dissipation is not efficient enough where the temperature increases little by
little until reaching the critical threshold and leading to a SoC reset.
The behavior is reproducible on a hikey6220 with bad heat dissipation (eg.
stacked with other boards).
Running a simple C program doing while(1); for each CPU of the SoC makes the
temperature to reach the passive regulation trip point and ends up to the
maximum allowed temperature followed by a reset.
This issue has been also reported by running the libhugetlbfs test suite.
What is observed is a ping pong between two cpu frequencies, 1.2GHz and 900MHz
while the temperature continues to grow.
It appears the step wise governor calls get_target_state() the first time with
the throttle set to true and the trend to 'raising'. The code selects logically
the next state, so the cpu frequency decreases from 1.2GHz to 900MHz, so far so
good. The temperature decreases immediately but still stays greater than the
trip point, then get_target_state() is called again, this time with the
throttle set to true *and* the trend to 'dropping'. From there the algorithm
assumes we have to step down the state and the cpu frequency jumps back to
1.2GHz. But the temperature is still higher than the trip point, so
get_target_state() is called with throttle=1 and trend='raising' again, we jump
to 900MHz, then get_target_state() is called with throttle=1 and
trend='dropping', we jump to 1.2GHz, etc ... but the temperature does not
stabilizes and continues to increase.
[ 237.922654] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[ 237.922678] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[ 237.922690] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=0
[ 237.922701] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=0, target=1
[ 238.026656] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=2,throttle=1
[ 238.026680] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=2,throttle=1
[ 238.026694] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 238.026707] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=0
[ 238.134647] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[ 238.134667] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[ 238.134679] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=0
[ 238.134690] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=0, target=1
In this situation the temperature continues to increase while the trend is
oscillating between 'dropping' and 'raising'. We need to keep the current state
untouched if the throttle is set, so the temperature can decrease or a higher
state could be selected, thus preventing this oscillation.
Keeping the next_target untouched when 'throttle' is true at 'dropping' time
fixes the issue.
The following traces show the governor does not change the next state if
trend==2 (dropping) and throttle==1.
[ 2306.127987] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[ 2306.128009] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[ 2306.128021] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=0
[ 2306.128031] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=0, target=1
[ 2306.231991] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=2,throttle=1
[ 2306.232016] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=2,throttle=1
[ 2306.232030] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2306.232042] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=1
[ 2306.335982] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=0,throttle=1
[ 2306.336006] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=0,throttle=1
[ 2306.336021] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2306.336034] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=1
[ 2306.439984] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=2,throttle=1
[ 2306.440008] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=2,throttle=0
[ 2306.440022] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2306.440034] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=0
[ ... ]
After a while, if the temperature continues to increase, the next state becomes
2 which is 720MHz on the hikey. That results in the temperature stabilizing
around the trip point.
[ 2455.831982] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[ 2455.832006] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=1,throttle=0
[ 2455.832019] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2455.832032] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=1
[ 2455.935985] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=0,throttle=1
[ 2455.936013] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=0,throttle=0
[ 2455.936027] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2455.936040] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=1
[ 2456.043984] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=0,throttle=1
[ 2456.044009] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=0,throttle=0
[ 2456.044023] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2456.044036] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=1
[ 2456.148001] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[ 2456.148028] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[ 2456.148042] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2456.148055] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=2
[ 2456.252009] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=2,throttle=1
[ 2456.252041] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=2,throttle=0
[ 2456.252058] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=2
[ 2456.252075] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=2, target=1
IOW, this change is needed to keep the state for a cooling device if the
temperature trend is oscillating while the temperature increases slightly.
Without this change, the situation above leads to a catastrophic crash by a
hardware reset on hikey. This issue has been reported to happen on an OMAP
dra7xx also.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano(a)linaro.org>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy(a)ti.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz(a)linaro.org>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan(a)linaro.org>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy(a)ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy(a)ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval(a)gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin(a)verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/thermal/step_wise.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
@@ -31,8 +31,7 @@
* If the temperature is higher than a trip point,
* a. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_RAISING, use higher cooling
* state for this trip point
- * b. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING, use lower cooling
- * state for this trip point
+ * b. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING, do nothing
* c. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_FULL, use upper limit
* for this trip point
* d. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL, use lower limit
@@ -94,9 +93,11 @@ static unsigned long get_target_state(st
if (!throttle)
next_target = THERMAL_NO_TARGET;
} else {
- next_target = cur_state - 1;
- if (next_target > instance->upper)
- next_target = instance->upper;
+ if (!throttle) {
+ next_target = cur_state - 1;
+ if (next_target > instance->upper)
+ next_target = instance->upper;
+ }
}
break;
case THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL:
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from daniel.lezcano(a)linaro.org are
queue-4.9/thermal-drivers-step_wise-fix-temperature-regulation-misbehavior.patch
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
target: Use system workqueue for ALUA transitions
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum…
The filename of the patch is:
target-use-system-workqueue-for-alua-transitions.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Mon Dec 18 14:12:34 CET 2017
From: Mike Christie <mchristi(a)redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 23:13:26 -0600
Subject: target: Use system workqueue for ALUA transitions
From: Mike Christie <mchristi(a)redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 207ee84133c00a8a2a5bdec94df4a5b37d78881c ]
If tcmu-runner is processing a STPG and needs to change the kernel's
ALUA state then we cannot use the same work queue for task management
requests and ALUA transitions, because we could deadlock. The problem
occurs when a STPG times out before tcmu-runner is able to
call into target_tg_pt_gp_alua_access_state_store->
core_alua_do_port_transition -> core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt ->
queue_work. In this case, the tmr is on the work queue waiting for
the STPG to complete, but the STPG transition is now queued behind
the waiting tmr.
Note:
This bug will also be fixed by this patch:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg14560.html
which switches the tmr code to use the system workqueues.
For both, I am not sure if we need a dedicated workqueue since
it is not a performance path and I do not think we need WQ_MEM_RECLAIM
to make forward progress to free up memory like the block layer does.
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <mchristi(a)redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab(a)linux-iscsi.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin(a)verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/target/target_core_alua.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_alua.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_alua.c
@@ -1118,13 +1118,11 @@ static int core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt
unsigned long transition_tmo;
transition_tmo = tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_implicit_trans_secs * HZ;
- queue_delayed_work(tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_dev->tmr_wq,
- &tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_work,
- transition_tmo);
+ schedule_delayed_work(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_work,
+ transition_tmo);
} else {
tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_complete = &wait;
- queue_delayed_work(tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_dev->tmr_wq,
- &tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_work, 0);
+ schedule_delayed_work(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_work, 0);
wait_for_completion(&wait);
tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_complete = NULL;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from mchristi(a)redhat.com are
queue-4.9/target-use-system-workqueue-for-alua-transitions.patch
queue-4.9/target-iscsi-fix-a-race-condition-in-iscsit_add_reject_from_cmd.patch
queue-4.9/target-fix-alua-transition-timeout-handling.patch
queue-4.9/target-fix-race-during-implicit-transition-work-flushes.patch
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
target/iscsi: Fix a race condition in iscsit_add_reject_from_cmd()
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum…
The filename of the patch is:
target-iscsi-fix-a-race-condition-in-iscsit_add_reject_from_cmd.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Mon Dec 18 14:12:35 CET 2017
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche(a)wdc.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 11:03:17 -0700
Subject: target/iscsi: Fix a race condition in iscsit_add_reject_from_cmd()
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche(a)wdc.com>
[ Upstream commit cfe2b621bb18d86e93271febf8c6e37622da2d14 ]
Avoid that cmd->se_cmd.se_tfo is read after a command has already been
freed.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche(a)wdc.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de>
Cc: Mike Christie <mchristi(a)redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare(a)suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab(a)linux-iscsi.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin(a)verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c
+++ b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c
@@ -841,6 +841,7 @@ static int iscsit_add_reject_from_cmd(
unsigned char *buf)
{
struct iscsi_conn *conn;
+ const bool do_put = cmd->se_cmd.se_tfo != NULL;
if (!cmd->conn) {
pr_err("cmd->conn is NULL for ITT: 0x%08x\n",
@@ -871,7 +872,7 @@ static int iscsit_add_reject_from_cmd(
* Perform the kref_put now if se_cmd has already been setup by
* scsit_setup_scsi_cmd()
*/
- if (cmd->se_cmd.se_tfo != NULL) {
+ if (do_put) {
pr_debug("iscsi reject: calling target_put_sess_cmd >>>>>>\n");
target_put_sess_cmd(&cmd->se_cmd);
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bart.vanassche(a)wdc.com are
queue-4.9/target-iscsi-fix-a-race-condition-in-iscsit_add_reject_from_cmd.patch
queue-4.9/rdma-cma-avoid-triggering-undefined-behavior.patch
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
target: fix race during implicit transition work flushes
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum…
The filename of the patch is:
target-fix-race-during-implicit-transition-work-flushes.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Mon Dec 18 14:12:34 CET 2017
From: Mike Christie <mchristi(a)redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 04:59:50 -0600
Subject: target: fix race during implicit transition work flushes
From: Mike Christie <mchristi(a)redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 760bf578edf8122f2503a3a6a3f4b0de3b6ce0bb ]
This fixes the following races:
1. core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt could have read
tg_pt_gp_alua_access_state and gone into this if chunk:
if (!explicit &&
atomic_read(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_alua_access_state) ==
ALUA_ACCESS_STATE_TRANSITION) {
and then core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt_work could update the
state. core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt would then only set
tg_pt_gp_alua_pending_state and the tg_pt_gp_alua_access_state would
not get updated with the second calls state.
2. core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt could be setting
tg_pt_gp_transition_complete while the tg_pt_gp_transition_work
is already completing. core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt then waits on the
completion that will never be called.
To handle these issues, we just call flush_work which will return when
core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt_work has completed so there is no need
to do the complete/wait. And, if core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt_work
was running, instead of trying to sneak in the state change, we just
schedule up another core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt_work call.
Note that this does not handle a possible race where there are multiple
threads call core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt at the same time. I think
we need a mutex in target_tg_pt_gp_alua_access_state_store.
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <mchristi(a)redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab(a)linux-iscsi.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin(a)verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/target/target_core_alua.c | 10 +---------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_alua.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_alua.c
@@ -1073,16 +1073,8 @@ static int core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt
/*
* Flush any pending transitions
*/
- if (!explicit && atomic_read(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_alua_access_state) ==
- ALUA_ACCESS_STATE_TRANSITION) {
- /* Just in case */
- tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_alua_pending_state = new_state;
- tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_complete = &wait;
+ if (!explicit)
flush_work(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_work);
- wait_for_completion(&wait);
- tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_transition_complete = NULL;
- return 0;
- }
/*
* Save the old primary ALUA access state, and set the current state
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from mchristi(a)redhat.com are
queue-4.9/target-use-system-workqueue-for-alua-transitions.patch
queue-4.9/target-iscsi-fix-a-race-condition-in-iscsit_add_reject_from_cmd.patch
queue-4.9/target-fix-alua-transition-timeout-handling.patch
queue-4.9/target-fix-race-during-implicit-transition-work-flushes.patch
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
target:fix condition return in core_pr_dump_initiator_port()
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum…
The filename of the patch is:
target-fix-condition-return-in-core_pr_dump_initiator_port.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Mon Dec 18 14:12:35 CET 2017
From: tangwenji <tang.wenji(a)zte.com.cn>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 19:59:37 +0800
Subject: target:fix condition return in core_pr_dump_initiator_port()
From: tangwenji <tang.wenji(a)zte.com.cn>
[ Upstream commit 24528f089d0a444070aa4f715ace537e8d6bf168 ]
When is pr_reg->isid_present_at_reg is false,this function should return.
This fixes a regression originally introduced by:
commit d2843c173ee53cf4c12e7dfedc069a5bc76f0ac5
Author: Andy Grover <agrover(a)redhat.com>
Date: Thu May 16 10:40:55 2013 -0700
target: Alter core_pr_dump_initiator_port for ease of use
Signed-off-by: tangwenji <tang.wenji(a)zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab(a)linux-iscsi.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin(a)verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/target/target_core_pr.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
@@ -56,8 +56,10 @@ void core_pr_dump_initiator_port(
char *buf,
u32 size)
{
- if (!pr_reg->isid_present_at_reg)
+ if (!pr_reg->isid_present_at_reg) {
buf[0] = '\0';
+ return;
+ }
snprintf(buf, size, ",i,0x%s", pr_reg->pr_reg_isid);
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tang.wenji(a)zte.com.cn are
queue-4.9/target-fix-condition-return-in-core_pr_dump_initiator_port.patch
queue-4.9/iscsi-target-fix-memory-leak-in-lio_target_tiqn_addtpg.patch