From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal(a)arm.com>
KVM only supports PMD hugepages at stage 2 but doesn't actually check
that the provided hugepage memory pagesize is PMD_SIZE before populating
stage 2 entries.
In cases where the backing hugepage size is smaller than PMD_SIZE (such
as when using contiguous hugepages), KVM can end up creating stage 2
mappings that extend beyond the supplied memory.
Fix this by checking for the pagesize of userspace vma before creating
PMD hugepage at stage 2.
Fixes: 66b3923a1a0f77a ("arm64: hugetlb: add support for PTE contiguous bit")
Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal(a)arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier(a)arm.com>
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> # v4.5+
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall(a)linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall(a)linaro.org>
---
virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
index b4b69c2d1012..9dea96380339 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
@@ -1310,7 +1310,7 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
return -EFAULT;
}
- if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) && !logging_active) {
+ if (vma_kernel_pagesize(vma) == PMD_SIZE && !logging_active) {
hugetlb = true;
gfn = (fault_ipa & PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
} else {
--
2.14.2
Starting from commit 041e4575f034 ("mtd: nand: handle ECC errors in
OOB"), nand_do_read_oob() (from the NAND core) did return 0 or a
negative error, and the MTD layer expected it.
However, the trend for the NAND layer is now to return an error or a
positive number of bitflips. Deciding which status to return to the user
belongs to the MTD layer.
Commit e47f68587b82 ("mtd: check for max_bitflips in mtd_read_oob()")
brought this logic to the mtd_read_oob() function while the return value
coming from nand_do_read_oob() (called by the ->_read_oob() hook) was
left unchanged.
Fixes: e47f68587b82 ("mtd: check for max_bitflips in mtd_read_oob()")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal(a)free-electrons.com>
---
Changes since v1:
- s/->ecc.read_oob() hook/->_read_oob() hook/ in the commit message
- Fixed the compilation issue
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
index 469220065b8b..440d9f5d5b17 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
@@ -3876,7 +3876,7 @@ static int nand_do_read_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from,
if (mtd->ecc_stats.failed - stats.failed)
return -EBADMSG;
- return mtd->ecc_stats.corrected - stats.corrected ? -EUCLEAN : 0;
+ return ret;
}
/**
--
2.11.0
On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 08:23 +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 07:07:06PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 21:00 +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 04:02:33PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 08:22 +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > > The proposed patch definitely decreases the chance of races, but it is not fixing them.
> > > > > There is a chance to have change in qp state immediately after your "if ..." check.
> > > >
> > > > Hello Leon,
> > > >
> > > > Please have a look at rxe_qp_error() and you will see that the patch I posted
> > > > is a proper fix. In the scenario you described rxe_qp_error() will trigger a
> > > > run of rxe_completer().
> > >
> > > Bart,
> > >
> > > What am I missing?
> > >
> > > CPU1 CPU2
> > > if (unlikely....
> > > <---
> > > /* move the qp to the error state */
> > > void rxe_qp_error(struct rxe_qp *qp)
> > > {
> > > qp->req.state = QP_STATE_ERROR;
> > > qp->resp.state = QP_STATE_ERROR;
> > > qp->attr.qp_state = IB_QPS_ERR;
> > > --->
> > > rxe_run_task(&qp->req.task, must_sched);
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > It is more or less the same as without "if (unlikely..."
> >
> > Hello Leon,
> >
> > In the above the part of rxe_qp_error() that I was referring to in my e-mail
> > is missing:
> >
> > if (qp_type(qp) == IB_QPT_RC)
> > rxe_run_task(&qp->comp.task, 1);
>
>
> But it is exactly where race exists, as long QP isn't protected, it can
> switch CPUs and create race.
Hello Leon,
Can you clarify which race you are referring to? rxe_run_task() uses the
tasklet mechanism and tasklets are guaranteed to run on at most one CPU at a
time. See also the "Top and Bottom Halves" chapter in Linux Device Drivers,
3rd edition. See also the tasklet_schedule() implementation in
<linux/interrupt.h> and in kernel/softirq.c.
Thanks,
Bart.
Hi Arnd,
On Thursday 11 January 2018 11:46 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd(a)arndb.de> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon(a)ti.com> wrote:
>>> On Thursday 11 January 2018 02:27 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:32 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon(a)ti.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Monday 08 January 2018 06:31 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>>>> Stefan Wahren reports a problem with a warning fix that was merged
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> This obviously needs to be tested, I wrote this up as a reply to
>>>>>> Stefan's bug report. I'm fairly sure that I covered all usb-phy
>>>>>> driver strings here. My goal is to have a fix merged into 4.15
>>>>>> rather than reverting all the DT fixes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Shouldn't the fix be in phy consumer drivers to not return error if it's able
>>>>> to find the phy either using usb-phy or generic phy?
>>>>
>>>> Stefan has posted a patch to that effect now, but I fear that might be
>>>> a little fragile, in particular this short before the release with the
>>>> regression
>>>> in place.
>>>>
>>>> The main problem is that we'd have to change the generic
>>>> usb_add_hcd() function in addition to dwc2 and dwc3 to ignore
>>>> -EPROBE_DEFER from phy_get() whenever usb_get_phy_dev()
>>>> has already succeeded.
>>>>
>>>> If there is any HCD that relies on usb_add_hcd() to get both the
>>>> usb_phy and the phy structures, and it may need to defer probing
>>>> when the latter one isn't ready yet, that fix would break another
>>>> driver.
>>>
>>> hmm.. IMO the better thing right now would be to revert the dt patch which adds
>>> #phy-cells.
>>> We have to see if there are better fixes in order to add #phy-cells warning fix
>>> in stable tree.
>>
>> Let's see which patches that would be, I think this is the full list of
>> nodes that got an extra #phy-cells:
>>
>> c22fe696157d ARM: dts: Fix dm814x missing phy-cells property
>> f0e11ff8ff65 ARM: dts: am33xx: Add missing #phy-cells to ti,am335x-usb-phy
>> c5bbf358b790 arm: dts: nspire: Add missing #phy-cells to usb-nop-xceiv
>> 44e5dced2ef6 arm: dts: marvell: Add missing #phy-cells to usb-nop-xceiv
>> 014d6da6cb25 ARM: dts: bcm283x: Fix DTC warnings about missing phy-cells
>> f568f6f554b8 ARM: dts: omap: Add missing #phy-cells to usb-nop-xceiv
>>
>> plus a couple in linux-next:
>>
>> d745d5f277bf ARM: dts: imx51-zii-rdu1: Add missing #phy-cells to usb-nop-xceiv
>> 915fbe59cbf2 ARM: dts: imx: Add missing #phy-cells to usb-nop-xceiv
>>
>> It's a lot of patches to revert, and I guess it would get us back to hundreds
>> of warnings in an allmodconfig build, so I'd first try to come up with
>> ways to prove that at least some of them can stay.
>>
>> Almost all the warnings are about "usb-nop-xceiv" phys, the only exceptions
>> I could find are the OMAP ones (the first two patches), which use
>> "ti,am335x-usb-phy" and are referenced from a "ti,musb-am33xx". That
>> particular driver is not affected by the bug, so we can leave that in.
>>
>> To deal with all the "usb-nop-xceiv" references including the one that
>> Stefan reported, we could use a much simpler version of my earlier
>> patch, do you think this is any better?
yeah, this looks simpler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd(a)arndb.de>
In case you want to take this patch yourself
Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon(a)ti.com>
(or let me know if I have to create a separate pull request for Greg)
Thanks
Kishon
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
>> index b4964b067aec..f056d8fb3921 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
>> @@ -410,6 +410,10 @@ static struct phy *_of_phy_get(struct device_node
>> *np, int index)
>> if (ret)
>> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>
>> + /* This phy type handled by the usb-phy subsystem for now */
>> + if (of_device_is_compatible("usb-nop-xceiv"))
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> +
>> mutex_lock(&phy_provider_mutex);
>> phy_provider = of_phy_provider_lookup(args.np);
>> if (IS_ERR(phy_provider) || !try_module_get(phy_provider->owner)) {
>
> This seems like a nice workaround!
>
The patch titled
Subject: pipe: fix off-by-one error when checking buffer limits
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
pipe-fix-off-by-one-error-when-checking-buffer-limits.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/pipe-fix-off-by-one-error-when-che…
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/pipe-fix-off-by-one-error-when-che…
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers(a)google.com>
Subject: pipe: fix off-by-one error when checking buffer limits
With pipe-user-pages-hard set to 'N', users were actually only allowed up
to 'N - 1' buffers; and likewise for pipe-user-pages-soft.
Fix this to allow up to 'N' buffers, as would be expected.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180111052902.14409-5-ebiggers3@gmail.com
Fixes: b0b91d18e2e9 ("pipe: fix limit checking in pipe_set_size()")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers(a)google.com>
Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w(a)1wt.eu>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org>
Acked-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence(a)redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro(a)zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof(a)kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages(a)gmail.com>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka(a)redhat.com>
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/pipe.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/pipe.c~pipe-fix-off-by-one-error-when-checking-buffer-limits fs/pipe.c
--- a/fs/pipe.c~pipe-fix-off-by-one-error-when-checking-buffer-limits
+++ a/fs/pipe.c
@@ -605,12 +605,12 @@ static unsigned long account_pipe_buffer
static bool too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(unsigned long user_bufs)
{
- return pipe_user_pages_soft && user_bufs >= pipe_user_pages_soft;
+ return pipe_user_pages_soft && user_bufs > pipe_user_pages_soft;
}
static bool too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(unsigned long user_bufs)
{
- return pipe_user_pages_hard && user_bufs >= pipe_user_pages_hard;
+ return pipe_user_pages_hard && user_bufs > pipe_user_pages_hard;
}
static bool is_unprivileged_user(void)
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from ebiggers(a)google.com are
userfaultfd-convert-to-use-anon_inode_getfd.patch
pipe-sysctl-drop-min-parameter-from-pipe-max-size-converter.patch
pipe-sysctl-remove-pipe_proc_fn.patch
pipe-actually-allow-root-to-exceed-the-pipe-buffer-limits.patch
pipe-fix-off-by-one-error-when-checking-buffer-limits.patch
pipe-reject-f_setpipe_sz-with-size-over-uint_max.patch
pipe-simplify-round_pipe_size.patch
pipe-read-buffer-limits-atomically.patch
The patch titled
Subject: pipe: actually allow root to exceed the pipe buffer limits
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
pipe-actually-allow-root-to-exceed-the-pipe-buffer-limits.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/pipe-actually-allow-root-to-exceed…
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/pipe-actually-allow-root-to-exceed…
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers(a)google.com>
Subject: pipe: actually allow root to exceed the pipe buffer limits
pipe-user-pages-hard and pipe-user-pages-soft are only supposed to apply
to unprivileged users, as documented in both Documentation/sysctl/fs.txt
and the pipe(7) man page.
However, the capabilities are actually only checked when increasing a
pipe's size using F_SETPIPE_SZ, not when creating a new pipe. Therefore,
if pipe-user-pages-hard has been set, the root user can run into it and be
unable to create pipes. Similarly, if pipe-user-pages-soft has been set,
the root user can run into it and have their pipes limited to 1 page each.
Fix this by allowing the privileged override in both cases.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180111052902.14409-4-ebiggers3@gmail.com
Fixes: 759c01142a5d ("pipe: limit the per-user amount of pages allocated in pipes")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers(a)google.com>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org>
Acked-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence(a)redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro(a)zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof(a)kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages(a)gmail.com>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka(a)redhat.com>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w(a)1wt.eu>
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/pipe.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/pipe.c~pipe-actually-allow-root-to-exceed-the-pipe-buffer-limits fs/pipe.c
--- a/fs/pipe.c~pipe-actually-allow-root-to-exceed-the-pipe-buffer-limits
+++ a/fs/pipe.c
@@ -613,6 +613,11 @@ static bool too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(u
return pipe_user_pages_hard && user_bufs >= pipe_user_pages_hard;
}
+static bool is_unprivileged_user(void)
+{
+ return !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
+}
+
struct pipe_inode_info *alloc_pipe_info(void)
{
struct pipe_inode_info *pipe;
@@ -629,12 +634,12 @@ struct pipe_inode_info *alloc_pipe_info(
user_bufs = account_pipe_buffers(user, 0, pipe_bufs);
- if (too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(user_bufs)) {
+ if (too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(user_bufs) && is_unprivileged_user()) {
user_bufs = account_pipe_buffers(user, pipe_bufs, 1);
pipe_bufs = 1;
}
- if (too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(user_bufs))
+ if (too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(user_bufs) && is_unprivileged_user())
goto out_revert_acct;
pipe->bufs = kcalloc(pipe_bufs, sizeof(struct pipe_buffer),
@@ -1065,7 +1070,7 @@ static long pipe_set_size(struct pipe_in
if (nr_pages > pipe->buffers &&
(too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(user_bufs) ||
too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(user_bufs)) &&
- !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
+ is_unprivileged_user()) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto out_revert_acct;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from ebiggers(a)google.com are
userfaultfd-convert-to-use-anon_inode_getfd.patch
pipe-sysctl-drop-min-parameter-from-pipe-max-size-converter.patch
pipe-sysctl-remove-pipe_proc_fn.patch
pipe-actually-allow-root-to-exceed-the-pipe-buffer-limits.patch
pipe-fix-off-by-one-error-when-checking-buffer-limits.patch
pipe-reject-f_setpipe_sz-with-size-over-uint_max.patch
pipe-simplify-round_pipe_size.patch
pipe-read-buffer-limits-atomically.patch
Starting from commit 041e4575f034 ("mtd: nand: handle ECC errors in
OOB"), nand_do_read_oob() (from the NAND core) did return 0 or a
negative error, and the MTD layer expected it.
However, the trend for the NAND layer is now to return an error or a
positive number of bitflips. Deciding which status to return to the user
belongs to the MTD layer.
Commit e47f68587b82 ("mtd: check for max_bitflips in mtd_read_oob()")
brought this logic to the mtd_read_oob() function while the status
coming from nand_do_read_oob() (called by the ->ecc.read_oob() hook) was
left unchanged.
Fixes: e47f68587b82 ("mtd: check for max_bitflips in mtd_read_oob()")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal(a)free-electrons.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
index 469220065b8b..88256b656072 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
@@ -3876,7 +3876,7 @@ static int nand_do_read_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from,
if (mtd->ecc_stats.failed - stats.failed)
return -EBADMSG;
- return mtd->ecc_stats.corrected - stats.corrected ? -EUCLEAN : 0;
+ return max_bitflips;
}
/**
--
2.11.0
Hi,
On 1/11/2018 12:16 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen(a)synopsys.com> writes:
>> In control read transfer completion handler, the driver needs to reset
>> the TRB enqueue counter. Since there is one control endpoint structure
>> for each direction, we must also track the TRB enqueue counter for each
>> direction. Currently the driver only resets the TRB counter for control
>> OUT endpoint only. Check for the data direction and properly reset the
>> TRB counter from correct control endpoint.
>>
>> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Thinh Nguyen <thinhn(a)synopsys.com>
>
> missing Fixes tag
Same with this patch. There's no particular commit that it fixes.
BR,
Thinh