- Linux-stable-mirror - lists.linaro.org

Patch "btrfs: Fix use-after-free when cleaning up fs_devs with a single stale device" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled btrfs: Fix use-after-free when cleaning up fs_devs with a single stale device to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: btrfs-fix-use-after-free-when-cleaning-up-fs_devs-with-a-single-stale-device.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From fd649f10c3d21ee9d7542c609f29978bdf73ab94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov(a)suse.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:07:37 +0200 Subject: btrfs: Fix use-after-free when cleaning up fs_devs with a single stale device From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov(a)suse.com> commit fd649f10c3d21ee9d7542c609f29978bdf73ab94 upstream. Commit 4fde46f0cc71 ("Btrfs: free the stale device") introduced btrfs_free_stale_device which iterates the device lists for all registered btrfs filesystems and deletes those devices which aren't mounted. In a btrfs_devices structure has only 1 device attached to it and it is unused then btrfs_free_stale_devices will proceed to also free the btrfs_fs_devices struct itself. Currently this leads to a use after free since list_for_each_entry will try to perform a check on the already freed memory to see if it has to terminate the loop. The fix is to use 'break' when we know we are freeing the current fs_devs. Fixes: 4fde46f0cc71 ("Btrfs: free the stale device") Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain(a)oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -583,6 +583,7 @@ void btrfs_free_stale_device(struct btrf btrfs_sysfs_remove_fsid(fs_devs); list_del(&fs_devs->list); free_fs_devices(fs_devs); + break; } else { fs_devs->num_devices--; list_del(&dev->dev_list); Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from nborisov(a)suse.com are queue-4.9/btrfs-fix-use-after-free-when-cleaning-up-fs_devs-with-a-single-stale-device.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "btrfs: alloc_chunk: fix DUP stripe size handling" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled btrfs: alloc_chunk: fix DUP stripe size handling to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: btrfs-alloc_chunk-fix-dup-stripe-size-handling.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From 92e222df7b8f05c565009c7383321b593eca488b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg(a)mendix.com> Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 17:45:11 +0100 Subject: btrfs: alloc_chunk: fix DUP stripe size handling From: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg(a)mendix.com> commit 92e222df7b8f05c565009c7383321b593eca488b upstream. In case of using DUP, we search for enough unallocated disk space on a device to hold two stripes. The devices_info[ndevs-1].max_avail that holds the amount of unallocated space found is directly assigned to stripe_size, while it's actually twice the stripe size. Later on in the code, an unconditional division of stripe_size by dev_stripes corrects the value, but in the meantime there's a check to see if the stripe_size does not exceed max_chunk_size. Since during this check stripe_size is twice the amount as intended, the check will reduce the stripe_size to max_chunk_size if the actual correct to be used stripe_size is more than half the amount of max_chunk_size. The unconditional division later tries to correct stripe_size, but will actually make sure we can't allocate more than half the max_chunk_size. Fix this by moving the division by dev_stripes before the max chunk size check, so it always contains the right value, instead of putting a duct tape division in further on to get it fixed again. Since in all other cases than DUP, dev_stripes is 1, this change only affects DUP. Other attempts in the past were made to fix this: * 37db63a400 "Btrfs: fix max chunk size check in chunk allocator" tried to fix the same problem, but still resulted in part of the code acting on a wrongly doubled stripe_size value. * 86db25785a "Btrfs: fix max chunk size on raid5/6" unintentionally broke this fix again. The real problem was already introduced with the rest of the code in 73c5de0051. The user visible result however will be that the max chunk size for DUP will suddenly double, while it's actually acting according to the limits in the code again like it was 5 years ago. Reported-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota(a)wdc.com> Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg69752.html Fixes: 73c5de0051 ("btrfs: quasi-round-robin for chunk allocation") Fixes: 86db25785a ("Btrfs: fix max chunk size on raid5/6") Signed-off-by: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg(a)mendix.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> [ update comment ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -4748,10 +4748,13 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct bt if (devs_max && ndevs > devs_max) ndevs = devs_max; /* - * the primary goal is to maximize the number of stripes, so use as many - * devices as possible, even if the stripes are not maximum sized. + * The primary goal is to maximize the number of stripes, so use as + * many devices as possible, even if the stripes are not maximum sized. + * + * The DUP profile stores more than one stripe per device, the + * max_avail is the total size so we have to adjust. */ - stripe_size = devices_info[ndevs-1].max_avail; + stripe_size = div_u64(devices_info[ndevs - 1].max_avail, dev_stripes); num_stripes = ndevs * dev_stripes; /* @@ -4791,8 +4794,6 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct bt stripe_size = devices_info[ndevs-1].max_avail; } - stripe_size = div_u64(stripe_size, dev_stripes); - /* align to BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN */ stripe_size = div_u64(stripe_size, raid_stripe_len); stripe_size *= raid_stripe_len; Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from hans.van.kranenburg(a)mendix.com are queue-4.9/btrfs-alloc_chunk-fix-dup-stripe-size-handling.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "btrfs: Fix use-after-free when cleaning up fs_devs with a single stale device" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled btrfs: Fix use-after-free when cleaning up fs_devs with a single stale device to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: btrfs-fix-use-after-free-when-cleaning-up-fs_devs-with-a-single-stale-device.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From fd649f10c3d21ee9d7542c609f29978bdf73ab94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov(a)suse.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:07:37 +0200 Subject: btrfs: Fix use-after-free when cleaning up fs_devs with a single stale device From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov(a)suse.com> commit fd649f10c3d21ee9d7542c609f29978bdf73ab94 upstream. Commit 4fde46f0cc71 ("Btrfs: free the stale device") introduced btrfs_free_stale_device which iterates the device lists for all registered btrfs filesystems and deletes those devices which aren't mounted. In a btrfs_devices structure has only 1 device attached to it and it is unused then btrfs_free_stale_devices will proceed to also free the btrfs_fs_devices struct itself. Currently this leads to a use after free since list_for_each_entry will try to perform a check on the already freed memory to see if it has to terminate the loop. The fix is to use 'break' when we know we are freeing the current fs_devs. Fixes: 4fde46f0cc71 ("Btrfs: free the stale device") Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain(a)oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -568,6 +568,7 @@ void btrfs_free_stale_device(struct btrf btrfs_sysfs_remove_fsid(fs_devs); list_del(&fs_devs->list); free_fs_devices(fs_devs); + break; } else { fs_devs->num_devices--; list_del(&dev->dev_list); Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from nborisov(a)suse.com are queue-4.4/btrfs-fix-use-after-free-when-cleaning-up-fs_devs-with-a-single-stale-device.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "btrfs: alloc_chunk: fix DUP stripe size handling" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled btrfs: alloc_chunk: fix DUP stripe size handling to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: btrfs-alloc_chunk-fix-dup-stripe-size-handling.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From 92e222df7b8f05c565009c7383321b593eca488b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg(a)mendix.com> Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 17:45:11 +0100 Subject: btrfs: alloc_chunk: fix DUP stripe size handling From: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg(a)mendix.com> commit 92e222df7b8f05c565009c7383321b593eca488b upstream. In case of using DUP, we search for enough unallocated disk space on a device to hold two stripes. The devices_info[ndevs-1].max_avail that holds the amount of unallocated space found is directly assigned to stripe_size, while it's actually twice the stripe size. Later on in the code, an unconditional division of stripe_size by dev_stripes corrects the value, but in the meantime there's a check to see if the stripe_size does not exceed max_chunk_size. Since during this check stripe_size is twice the amount as intended, the check will reduce the stripe_size to max_chunk_size if the actual correct to be used stripe_size is more than half the amount of max_chunk_size. The unconditional division later tries to correct stripe_size, but will actually make sure we can't allocate more than half the max_chunk_size. Fix this by moving the division by dev_stripes before the max chunk size check, so it always contains the right value, instead of putting a duct tape division in further on to get it fixed again. Since in all other cases than DUP, dev_stripes is 1, this change only affects DUP. Other attempts in the past were made to fix this: * 37db63a400 "Btrfs: fix max chunk size check in chunk allocator" tried to fix the same problem, but still resulted in part of the code acting on a wrongly doubled stripe_size value. * 86db25785a "Btrfs: fix max chunk size on raid5/6" unintentionally broke this fix again. The real problem was already introduced with the rest of the code in 73c5de0051. The user visible result however will be that the max chunk size for DUP will suddenly double, while it's actually acting according to the limits in the code again like it was 5 years ago. Reported-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota(a)wdc.com> Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg69752.html Fixes: 73c5de0051 ("btrfs: quasi-round-robin for chunk allocation") Fixes: 86db25785a ("Btrfs: fix max chunk size on raid5/6") Signed-off-by: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg(a)mendix.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> [ update comment ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -4638,10 +4638,13 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct bt if (devs_max && ndevs > devs_max) ndevs = devs_max; /* - * the primary goal is to maximize the number of stripes, so use as many - * devices as possible, even if the stripes are not maximum sized. + * The primary goal is to maximize the number of stripes, so use as + * many devices as possible, even if the stripes are not maximum sized. + * + * The DUP profile stores more than one stripe per device, the + * max_avail is the total size so we have to adjust. */ - stripe_size = devices_info[ndevs-1].max_avail; + stripe_size = div_u64(devices_info[ndevs - 1].max_avail, dev_stripes); num_stripes = ndevs * dev_stripes; /* @@ -4681,8 +4684,6 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct bt stripe_size = devices_info[ndevs-1].max_avail; } - stripe_size = div_u64(stripe_size, dev_stripes); - /* align to BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN */ stripe_size = div_u64(stripe_size, raid_stripe_len); stripe_size *= raid_stripe_len; Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from hans.van.kranenburg(a)mendix.com are queue-4.4/btrfs-alloc_chunk-fix-dup-stripe-size-handling.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.9 001/281] qed: Fix overriding of supported autoneg value.

by Sasha Levin

From: "sudarsana.kalluru(a)cavium.com" <sudarsana.kalluru(a)cavium.com> [ Upstream commit 34f9199ce7b7e5c641b96e928bd60e086bf7f278 ] Driver currently uses advertised-autoneg value to populate the supported-autoneg field. When advertised field is updated, user gets the same value for supported field. Supported-autoneg value need to be populated from the link capabilities value returned by the MFW. Signed-off-by: Sudarsana Reddy Kalluru <Sudarsana.Kalluru(a)cavium.com> Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz(a)cavium.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem(a)davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin(a)microsoft.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_dev.c | 3 +++ drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_main.c | 6 +++++- drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_mcp.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_dev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_dev.c index afe5e57d9acb..9a6adbd9ed34 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_dev.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_dev.c @@ -1628,6 +1628,9 @@ static int qed_hw_get_nvm_info(struct qed_hwfn *p_hwfn, struct qed_ptt *p_ptt) DP_NOTICE(p_hwfn, "Unknown Speed in 0x%08x\n", link_temp); } + p_hwfn->mcp_info->link_capabilities.default_speed_autoneg = + link->speed.autoneg; + link_temp &= NVM_CFG1_PORT_DRV_FLOW_CONTROL_MASK; link_temp >>= NVM_CFG1_PORT_DRV_FLOW_CONTROL_OFFSET; link->pause.autoneg = !!(link_temp & diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_main.c index 333c7442e48a..605351a2a1bc 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_main.c @@ -1239,7 +1239,7 @@ static void qed_fill_link(struct qed_hwfn *hwfn, /* TODO - at the moment assume supported and advertised speed equal */ if_link->supported_caps = QED_LM_FIBRE_BIT; - if (params.speed.autoneg) + if (link_caps.default_speed_autoneg) if_link->supported_caps |= QED_LM_Autoneg_BIT; if (params.pause.autoneg || (params.pause.forced_rx && params.pause.forced_tx)) @@ -1249,6 +1249,10 @@ static void qed_fill_link(struct qed_hwfn *hwfn, if_link->supported_caps |= QED_LM_Pause_BIT; if_link->advertised_caps = if_link->supported_caps; + if (params.speed.autoneg) + if_link->advertised_caps |= QED_LM_Autoneg_BIT; + else + if_link->advertised_caps &= ~QED_LM_Autoneg_BIT; if (params.speed.advertised_speeds & NVM_CFG1_PORT_DRV_SPEED_CAPABILITY_MASK_1G) if_link->advertised_caps |= QED_LM_1000baseT_Half_BIT | diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_mcp.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_mcp.h index dff520ed069b..7b7a84d2c839 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_mcp.h +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_mcp.h @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct qed_mcp_link_params { struct qed_mcp_link_capabilities { u32 speed_capabilities; + bool default_speed_autoneg; }; struct qed_mcp_link_state { -- 2.14.1

7 years, 6 months

1
280
0 0

Patch "btrfs: remove spurious WARN_ON(ref->count < 0) in find_parent_nodes" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled btrfs: remove spurious WARN_ON(ref->count < 0) in find_parent_nodes to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: btrfs-remove-spurious-warn_on-ref-count-0-in-find_parent_nodes.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From c8195a7b1ad5648857ce20ba24f384faed8512bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj(a)umail.furryterror.org> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 22:22:09 -0500 Subject: btrfs: remove spurious WARN_ON(ref->count < 0) in find_parent_nodes From: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj(a)umail.furryterror.org> commit c8195a7b1ad5648857ce20ba24f384faed8512bc upstream. Until v4.14, this warning was very infrequent: WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 18172 at fs/btrfs/backref.c:1391 find_parent_nodes+0xc41/0x14e0 Modules linked in: [...] CPU: 3 PID: 18172 Comm: bees Tainted: G D W L 4.11.9-zb64+ #1 Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/M5A78L-M/USB3, BIOS 2101 12/02/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x85/0xc2 __warn+0xd1/0xf0 warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20 find_parent_nodes+0xc41/0x14e0 __btrfs_find_all_roots+0xad/0x120 ? extent_same_check_offsets+0x70/0x70 iterate_extent_inodes+0x168/0x300 iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xb0 ? iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xb0 ? extent_same_check_offsets+0x70/0x70 btrfs_ioctl+0x8ac/0x2820 ? lock_acquire+0xc2/0x200 do_vfs_ioctl+0x91/0x700 ? __fget+0x112/0x200 SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6 ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x1f/0x140 Starting with v4.14 (specifically 86d5f9944252 ("btrfs: convert prelimary reference tracking to use rbtrees")) the WARN_ON occurs three orders of magnitude more frequently--almost once per second while running workloads like bees. Replace the WARN_ON() with a comment rationale for its removal. The rationale is paraphrased from an explanation by Edmund Nadolski <enadolski(a)suse.de> on the linux-btrfs mailing list. Fixes: 8da6d5815c59 ("Btrfs: added btrfs_find_all_roots()") Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj(a)umail.furryterror.org> Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst(a)cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- fs/btrfs/backref.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c @@ -1263,7 +1263,16 @@ again: while (node) { ref = rb_entry(node, struct prelim_ref, rbnode); node = rb_next(&ref->rbnode); - WARN_ON(ref->count < 0); + /* + * ref->count < 0 can happen here if there are delayed + * refs with a node->action of BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF. + * prelim_ref_insert() relies on this when merging + * identical refs to keep the overall count correct. + * prelim_ref_insert() will merge only those refs + * which compare identically. Any refs having + * e.g. different offsets would not be merged, + * and would retain their original ref->count < 0. + */ if (roots && ref->count && ref->root_id && ref->parent == 0) { if (sc && sc->root_objectid && ref->root_id != sc->root_objectid) { Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ce3g8jdj(a)umail.furryterror.org are queue-4.15/btrfs-remove-spurious-warn_on-ref-count-0-in-find_parent_nodes.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "btrfs: Fix use-after-free when cleaning up fs_devs with a single stale device" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled btrfs: Fix use-after-free when cleaning up fs_devs with a single stale device to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: btrfs-fix-use-after-free-when-cleaning-up-fs_devs-with-a-single-stale-device.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From fd649f10c3d21ee9d7542c609f29978bdf73ab94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov(a)suse.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:07:37 +0200 Subject: btrfs: Fix use-after-free when cleaning up fs_devs with a single stale device From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov(a)suse.com> commit fd649f10c3d21ee9d7542c609f29978bdf73ab94 upstream. Commit 4fde46f0cc71 ("Btrfs: free the stale device") introduced btrfs_free_stale_device which iterates the device lists for all registered btrfs filesystems and deletes those devices which aren't mounted. In a btrfs_devices structure has only 1 device attached to it and it is unused then btrfs_free_stale_devices will proceed to also free the btrfs_fs_devices struct itself. Currently this leads to a use after free since list_for_each_entry will try to perform a check on the already freed memory to see if it has to terminate the loop. The fix is to use 'break' when we know we are freeing the current fs_devs. Fixes: 4fde46f0cc71 ("Btrfs: free the stale device") Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain(a)oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -574,6 +574,7 @@ static void btrfs_free_stale_device(stru btrfs_sysfs_remove_fsid(fs_devs); list_del(&fs_devs->list); free_fs_devices(fs_devs); + break; } else { fs_devs->num_devices--; list_del(&dev->dev_list); Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from nborisov(a)suse.com are queue-4.15/btrfs-fix-memory-barriers-usage-with-device-stats-counters.patch queue-4.15/btrfs-fix-use-after-free-when-cleaning-up-fs_devs-with-a-single-stale-device.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "btrfs: Fix NULL pointer exception in find_bio_stripe" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled btrfs: Fix NULL pointer exception in find_bio_stripe to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: btrfs-fix-null-pointer-exception-in-find_bio_stripe.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From 047fdea6341966a0898e3b16c51f54d4f5ba030a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dmitriy Gorokh <Dmitriy.Gorokh(a)wdc.com> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 19:51:38 +0000 Subject: btrfs: Fix NULL pointer exception in find_bio_stripe MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Dmitriy Gorokh <Dmitriy.Gorokh(a)wdc.com> commit 047fdea6341966a0898e3b16c51f54d4f5ba030a upstream. On detaching of a disk which is a part of a RAID6 filesystem, the following kernel OOPS may happen: [63122.680461] BTRFS error (device sdo): bdev /dev/sdo errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 1, corrupt 0, gen 0 [63122.719584] BTRFS warning (device sdo): lost page write due to IO error on /dev/sdo [63122.719587] BTRFS error (device sdo): bdev /dev/sdo errs: wr 1, rd 0, flush 1, corrupt 0, gen 0 [63122.803516] BTRFS warning (device sdo): lost page write due to IO error on /dev/sdo [63122.803519] BTRFS error (device sdo): bdev /dev/sdo errs: wr 2, rd 0, flush 1, corrupt 0, gen 0 [63122.863902] BTRFS critical (device sdo): fatal error on device /dev/sdo [63122.935338] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000080 [63122.946554] IP: fail_bio_stripe+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] [63122.958185] PGD 9ecda067 P4D 9ecda067 PUD b2b37067 PMD 0 [63122.971202] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP [63123.006760] CPU: 0 PID: 3979 Comm: kworker/u8:9 Tainted: G W 4.14.2-16-scst34x+ #8 [63123.007091] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [63123.007402] Workqueue: btrfs-worker btrfs_worker_helper [btrfs] [63123.007595] task: ffff880036ea4040 task.stack: ffffc90006384000 [63123.007796] RIP: 0010:fail_bio_stripe+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] [63123.007968] RSP: 0018:ffffc90006387ad8 EFLAGS: 00010287 [63123.008140] RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff88004beaa0b8 RCX: ffff8800b2bd5690 [63123.008359] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88007bb43500 RDI: ffff88004beaa000 [63123.008621] RBP: ffffc90006387ae8 R08: 0000000099100000 R09: ffff8800b2bd5600 [63123.008840] R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000010000 R12: ffff88007bb43500 [63123.009059] R13: 00000000fffffffb R14: ffff880036fc5180 R15: 0000000000000004 [63123.009278] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8800b7000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [63123.009564] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [63123.009748] CR2: 0000000000000080 CR3: 00000000b0866000 CR4: 00000000000406f0 [63123.009969] Call Trace: [63123.010085] raid_write_end_io+0x7e/0x80 [btrfs] [63123.010251] bio_endio+0xa1/0x120 [63123.010378] generic_make_request+0x218/0x270 [63123.010921] submit_bio+0x66/0x130 [63123.011073] finish_rmw+0x3fc/0x5b0 [btrfs] [63123.011245] full_stripe_write+0x96/0xc0 [btrfs] [63123.011428] raid56_parity_write+0x117/0x170 [btrfs] [63123.011604] btrfs_map_bio+0x2ec/0x320 [btrfs] [63123.011759] ? ___cache_free+0x1c5/0x300 [63123.011909] __btrfs_submit_bio_done+0x26/0x50 [btrfs] [63123.012087] run_one_async_done+0x9c/0xc0 [btrfs] [63123.012257] normal_work_helper+0x19e/0x300 [btrfs] [63123.012429] btrfs_worker_helper+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] [63123.012656] process_one_work+0x14d/0x350 [63123.012888] worker_thread+0x4d/0x3a0 [63123.013026] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x15/0x20 [63123.013192] kthread+0x109/0x140 [63123.013315] ? process_scheduled_works+0x40/0x40 [63123.013472] ? kthread_stop+0x110/0x110 [63123.013610] ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30 [63123.014469] RIP: fail_bio_stripe+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] RSP: ffffc90006387ad8 [63123.014678] CR2: 0000000000000080 [63123.016590] ---[ end trace a295ea7259c17880 ]— This is reproducible in a cycle, where a series of writes is followed by SCSI device delete command. The test may take up to few minutes. Fixes: 74d46992e0d9 ("block: replace bi_bdev with a gendisk pointer and partitions index") [ no signed-off-by provided ] Author: Dmitriy Gorokh <Dmitriy.Gorokh(a)wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu(a)oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- fs/btrfs/raid56.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c @@ -1351,6 +1351,7 @@ static int find_bio_stripe(struct btrfs_ stripe_start = stripe->physical; if (physical >= stripe_start && physical < stripe_start + rbio->stripe_len && + stripe->dev->bdev && bio->bi_disk == stripe->dev->bdev->bd_disk && bio->bi_partno == stripe->dev->bdev->bd_partno) { return i; Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from Dmitriy.Gorokh(a)wdc.com are queue-4.15/btrfs-fix-null-pointer-exception-in-find_bio_stripe.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "btrfs: Fix memory barriers usage with device stats counters" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled btrfs: Fix memory barriers usage with device stats counters to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: btrfs-fix-memory-barriers-usage-with-device-stats-counters.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From 9deae9689231964972a94bb56a79b669f9d47ac1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov(a)suse.com> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 13:47:37 +0300 Subject: btrfs: Fix memory barriers usage with device stats counters From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov(a)suse.com> commit 9deae9689231964972a94bb56a79b669f9d47ac1 upstream. Commit addc3fa74e5b ("Btrfs: Fix the problem that the dirty flag of dev stats is cleared") reworked the way device stats changes are tracked. A new atomic dev_stats_ccnt counter was introduced which is incremented every time any of the device stats counters are changed. This serves as a flag whether there are any pending stats changes. However, this patch only partially implemented the correct memory barriers necessary: - It only ordered the stores to the counters but not the reads e.g. btrfs_run_dev_stats - It completely omitted any comments documenting the intended design and how the memory barriers pair with each-other This patch provides the necessary comments as well as adds a missing smp_rmb in btrfs_run_dev_stats. Furthermore since dev_stats_cnt is only a snapshot at best there was no point in reading the counter twice - once in btrfs_dev_stats_dirty and then again when assigning stats_cnt. Just collapse both reads into 1. Fixes: addc3fa74e5b ("Btrfs: Fix the problem that the dirty flag of dev stats is cleared") Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers(a)efficios.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++-- fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 12 ++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -7093,10 +7093,24 @@ int btrfs_run_dev_stats(struct btrfs_tra mutex_lock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex); list_for_each_entry(device, &fs_devices->devices, dev_list) { - if (!device->dev_stats_valid || !btrfs_dev_stats_dirty(device)) + stats_cnt = atomic_read(&device->dev_stats_ccnt); + if (!device->dev_stats_valid || stats_cnt == 0) continue; - stats_cnt = atomic_read(&device->dev_stats_ccnt); + + /* + * There is a LOAD-LOAD control dependency between the value of + * dev_stats_ccnt and updating the on-disk values which requires + * reading the in-memory counters. Such control dependencies + * require explicit read memory barriers. + * + * This memory barriers pairs with smp_mb__before_atomic in + * btrfs_dev_stat_inc/btrfs_dev_stat_set and with the full + * barrier implied by atomic_xchg in + * btrfs_dev_stats_read_and_reset + */ + smp_rmb(); + ret = update_dev_stat_item(trans, fs_info, device); if (!ret) atomic_sub(stats_cnt, &device->dev_stats_ccnt); --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h @@ -498,6 +498,12 @@ static inline void btrfs_dev_stat_inc(st int index) { atomic_inc(dev->dev_stat_values + index); + /* + * This memory barrier orders stores updating statistics before stores + * updating dev_stats_ccnt. + * + * It pairs with smp_rmb() in btrfs_run_dev_stats(). + */ smp_mb__before_atomic(); atomic_inc(&dev->dev_stats_ccnt); } @@ -523,6 +529,12 @@ static inline void btrfs_dev_stat_set(st int index, unsigned long val) { atomic_set(dev->dev_stat_values + index, val); + /* + * This memory barrier orders stores updating statistics before stores + * updating dev_stats_ccnt. + * + * It pairs with smp_rmb() in btrfs_run_dev_stats(). + */ smp_mb__before_atomic(); atomic_inc(&dev->dev_stats_ccnt); } Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from nborisov(a)suse.com are queue-4.15/btrfs-fix-memory-barriers-usage-with-device-stats-counters.patch queue-4.15/btrfs-fix-use-after-free-when-cleaning-up-fs_devs-with-a-single-stale-device.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Patch "btrfs: alloc_chunk: fix DUP stripe size handling" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled btrfs: alloc_chunk: fix DUP stripe size handling to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=sum… The filename of the patch is: btrfs-alloc_chunk-fix-dup-stripe-size-handling.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> know about it. >From 92e222df7b8f05c565009c7383321b593eca488b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg(a)mendix.com> Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 17:45:11 +0100 Subject: btrfs: alloc_chunk: fix DUP stripe size handling From: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg(a)mendix.com> commit 92e222df7b8f05c565009c7383321b593eca488b upstream. In case of using DUP, we search for enough unallocated disk space on a device to hold two stripes. The devices_info[ndevs-1].max_avail that holds the amount of unallocated space found is directly assigned to stripe_size, while it's actually twice the stripe size. Later on in the code, an unconditional division of stripe_size by dev_stripes corrects the value, but in the meantime there's a check to see if the stripe_size does not exceed max_chunk_size. Since during this check stripe_size is twice the amount as intended, the check will reduce the stripe_size to max_chunk_size if the actual correct to be used stripe_size is more than half the amount of max_chunk_size. The unconditional division later tries to correct stripe_size, but will actually make sure we can't allocate more than half the max_chunk_size. Fix this by moving the division by dev_stripes before the max chunk size check, so it always contains the right value, instead of putting a duct tape division in further on to get it fixed again. Since in all other cases than DUP, dev_stripes is 1, this change only affects DUP. Other attempts in the past were made to fix this: * 37db63a400 "Btrfs: fix max chunk size check in chunk allocator" tried to fix the same problem, but still resulted in part of the code acting on a wrongly doubled stripe_size value. * 86db25785a "Btrfs: fix max chunk size on raid5/6" unintentionally broke this fix again. The real problem was already introduced with the rest of the code in 73c5de0051. The user visible result however will be that the max chunk size for DUP will suddenly double, while it's actually acting according to the limits in the code again like it was 5 years ago. Reported-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota(a)wdc.com> Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg69752.html Fixes: 73c5de0051 ("btrfs: quasi-round-robin for chunk allocation") Fixes: 86db25785a ("Btrfs: fix max chunk size on raid5/6") Signed-off-by: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg(a)mendix.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> [ update comment ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -4737,10 +4737,13 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct bt ndevs = min(ndevs, devs_max); /* - * the primary goal is to maximize the number of stripes, so use as many - * devices as possible, even if the stripes are not maximum sized. + * The primary goal is to maximize the number of stripes, so use as + * many devices as possible, even if the stripes are not maximum sized. + * + * The DUP profile stores more than one stripe per device, the + * max_avail is the total size so we have to adjust. */ - stripe_size = devices_info[ndevs-1].max_avail; + stripe_size = div_u64(devices_info[ndevs - 1].max_avail, dev_stripes); num_stripes = ndevs * dev_stripes; /* @@ -4775,8 +4778,6 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct bt stripe_size = devices_info[ndevs-1].max_avail; } - stripe_size = div_u64(stripe_size, dev_stripes); - /* align to BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN */ stripe_size = round_down(stripe_size, BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN); Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from hans.van.kranenburg(a)mendix.com are queue-4.15/btrfs-alloc_chunk-fix-dup-stripe-size-handling.patch

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror