The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 394bfac1c7f7b701c2c93834c5761b9c9ceeebcf
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025091344-purist-tattle-13ba@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 394bfac1c7f7b701c2c93834c5761b9c9ceeebcf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang(a)gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 06:33:18 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] mm/khugepaged: fix the address passed to notifier on testing
young
Commit 8ee53820edfd ("thp: mmu_notifier_test_young") introduced
mmu_notifier_test_young(), but we are passing the wrong address.
In xxx_scan_pmd(), the actual iteration address is "_address" not
"address". We seem to misuse the variable on the very beginning.
Change it to the right one.
[akpm(a)linux-foundation.org fix whitespace, per everyone]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250822063318.11644-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Fixes: 8ee53820edfd ("thp: mmu_notifier_test_young")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang(a)gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain(a)arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy(a)nvidia.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes(a)oracle.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang(a)linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett(a)oracle.com>
Cc: Nico Pache <npache(a)redhat.com>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com>
Cc: Barry Song <baohua(a)kernel.org>
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index 6b40bdfd224c..b486c1d19b2d 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -1417,8 +1417,8 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
*/
if (cc->is_khugepaged &&
(pte_young(pteval) || folio_test_young(folio) ||
- folio_test_referenced(folio) || mmu_notifier_test_young(vma->vm_mm,
- address)))
+ folio_test_referenced(folio) ||
+ mmu_notifier_test_young(vma->vm_mm, _address)))
referenced++;
}
if (!writable) {
The following commit has been merged into the core/rseq branch of tip:
Commit-ID: a001cd248ab244633c5fabe4f7c707e13fc1d1cc
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/a001cd248ab244633c5fabe4f7c707e13fc1d1cc
Author: Sean Christopherson <seanjc(a)google.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 15:29:44 -07:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de>
CommitterDate: Sat, 13 Sep 2025 19:51:59 +02:00
rseq/selftests: Use weak symbol reference, not definition, to link with glibc
Add "extern" to the glibc-defined weak rseq symbols to convert the rseq
selftest's usage from weak symbol definitions to weak symbol _references_.
Effectively re-defining the glibc symbols wreaks havoc when building with
-fno-common, e.g. generates segfaults when running multi-threaded programs,
as dynamically linked applications end up with multiple versions of the
symbols.
Building with -fcommon, which until recently has the been the default for
GCC and clang, papers over the bug by allowing the linker to resolve the
weak/tentative definition to glibc's "real" definition.
Note, the symbol itself (or rather its address), not the value of the
symbol, is set to 0/NULL for unresolved weak symbol references, as the
symbol doesn't exist and thus can't have a value. Check for a NULL rseq
size pointer to handle the scenario where the test is statically linked
against a libc that doesn't support rseq in any capacity.
Fixes: 3bcbc20942db ("selftests/rseq: Play nice with binaries statically linked against glibc 2.35+")
Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de>
Suggested-by: Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc(a)google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers(a)efficios.com>
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/87frdoybk4.ffs@tglx
---
tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c
index 663a9ce..dcac5cb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c
@@ -40,9 +40,9 @@
* Define weak versions to play nice with binaries that are statically linked
* against a libc that doesn't support registering its own rseq.
*/
-__weak ptrdiff_t __rseq_offset;
-__weak unsigned int __rseq_size;
-__weak unsigned int __rseq_flags;
+extern __weak ptrdiff_t __rseq_offset;
+extern __weak unsigned int __rseq_size;
+extern __weak unsigned int __rseq_flags;
static const ptrdiff_t *libc_rseq_offset_p = &__rseq_offset;
static const unsigned int *libc_rseq_size_p = &__rseq_size;
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ void rseq_init(void)
* libc not having registered a restartable sequence. Try to find the
* symbols if that's the case.
*/
- if (!*libc_rseq_size_p) {
+ if (!libc_rseq_size_p || !*libc_rseq_size_p) {
libc_rseq_offset_p = dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "__rseq_offset");
libc_rseq_size_p = dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "__rseq_size");
libc_rseq_flags_p = dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "__rseq_flags");
The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.12.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 9786531399a679fc2f4630d2c0a186205282ab2f
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025091345-gloater-dolly-54a5@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.12.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 9786531399a679fc2f4630d2c0a186205282ab2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 16:06:13 +0930
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix corruption reading compressed range when block
size is smaller than page size
[BUG]
With 64K page size (aarch64 with 64K page size config) and 4K btrfs
block size, the following workload can easily lead to a corrupted read:
mkfs.btrfs -f -s 4k $dev > /dev/null
mount -o compress $dev $mnt
xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xff 0 64k" $mnt/base > /dev/null
echo "correct result:"
od -Ad -t x1 $mnt/base
xfs_io -f -c "reflink $mnt/base 32k 0 32k" \
-c "reflink $mnt/base 0 32k 32k" \
-c "pwrite -S 0xff 60k 4k" $mnt/new > /dev/null
echo "incorrect result:"
od -Ad -t x1 $mnt/new
umount $mnt
This shows the following result:
correct result:
0000000 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
*
0065536
incorrect result:
0000000 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
*
0032768 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
*
0061440 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
*
0065536
Notice the zero in the range [32K, 60K), which is incorrect.
[CAUSE]
With extra trace printk, it shows the following events during od:
(some unrelated info removed like CPU and context)
od-3457 btrfs_do_readpage: enter r/i=5/258 folio=0(65536) prev_em_start=0000000000000000
The "r/i" is indicating the root and inode number. In our case the file
"new" is using ino 258 from fs tree (root 5).
Here notice the @prev_em_start pointer is NULL. This means the
btrfs_do_readpage() is called from btrfs_read_folio(), not from
btrfs_readahead().
od-3457 btrfs_do_readpage: r/i=5/258 folio=0(65536) cur=0 got em start=0 len=32768
od-3457 btrfs_do_readpage: r/i=5/258 folio=0(65536) cur=4096 got em start=0 len=32768
od-3457 btrfs_do_readpage: r/i=5/258 folio=0(65536) cur=8192 got em start=0 len=32768
od-3457 btrfs_do_readpage: r/i=5/258 folio=0(65536) cur=12288 got em start=0 len=32768
od-3457 btrfs_do_readpage: r/i=5/258 folio=0(65536) cur=16384 got em start=0 len=32768
od-3457 btrfs_do_readpage: r/i=5/258 folio=0(65536) cur=20480 got em start=0 len=32768
od-3457 btrfs_do_readpage: r/i=5/258 folio=0(65536) cur=24576 got em start=0 len=32768
od-3457 btrfs_do_readpage: r/i=5/258 folio=0(65536) cur=28672 got em start=0 len=32768
These above 32K blocks will be read from the first half of the
compressed data extent.
od-3457 btrfs_do_readpage: r/i=5/258 folio=0(65536) cur=32768 got em start=32768 len=32768
Note here there is no btrfs_submit_compressed_read() call. Which is
incorrect now.
Although both extent maps at 0 and 32K are pointing to the same compressed
data, their offsets are different thus can not be merged into the same
read.
So this means the compressed data read merge check is doing something
wrong.
od-3457 btrfs_do_readpage: r/i=5/258 folio=0(65536) cur=36864 got em start=32768 len=32768
od-3457 btrfs_do_readpage: r/i=5/258 folio=0(65536) cur=40960 got em start=32768 len=32768
od-3457 btrfs_do_readpage: r/i=5/258 folio=0(65536) cur=45056 got em start=32768 len=32768
od-3457 btrfs_do_readpage: r/i=5/258 folio=0(65536) cur=49152 got em start=32768 len=32768
od-3457 btrfs_do_readpage: r/i=5/258 folio=0(65536) cur=53248 got em start=32768 len=32768
od-3457 btrfs_do_readpage: r/i=5/258 folio=0(65536) cur=57344 got em start=32768 len=32768
od-3457 btrfs_do_readpage: r/i=5/258 folio=0(65536) cur=61440 skip uptodate
od-3457 btrfs_submit_compressed_read: cb orig_bio: file off=0 len=61440
The function btrfs_submit_compressed_read() is only called at the end of
folio read. The compressed bio will only have an extent map of range [0,
32K), but the original bio passed in is for the whole 64K folio.
This will cause the decompression part to only fill the first 32K,
leaving the rest untouched (aka, filled with zero).
This incorrect compressed read merge leads to the above data corruption.
There were similar problems that happened in the past, commit 808f80b46790
("Btrfs: update fix for read corruption of compressed and shared
extents") is doing pretty much the same fix for readahead.
But that's back to 2015, where btrfs still only supports bs (block size)
== ps (page size) cases.
This means btrfs_do_readpage() only needs to handle a folio which
contains exactly one block.
Only btrfs_readahead() can lead to a read covering multiple blocks.
Thus only btrfs_readahead() passes a non-NULL @prev_em_start pointer.
With v5.15 kernel btrfs introduced bs < ps support. This breaks the above
assumption that a folio can only contain one block.
Now btrfs_read_folio() can also read multiple blocks in one go.
But btrfs_read_folio() doesn't pass a @prev_em_start pointer, thus the
existing bio force submission check will never be triggered.
In theory, this can also happen for btrfs with large folios, but since
large folio is still experimental, we don't need to bother it, thus only
bs < ps support is affected for now.
[FIX]
Instead of passing @prev_em_start to do the proper compressed extent
check, introduce one new member, btrfs_bio_ctrl::last_em_start, so that
the existing bio force submission logic will always be triggered.
CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index c953297aa89a..b21cb72835cc 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -111,6 +111,24 @@ struct btrfs_bio_ctrl {
*/
unsigned long submit_bitmap;
struct readahead_control *ractl;
+
+ /*
+ * The start offset of the last used extent map by a read operation.
+ *
+ * This is for proper compressed read merge.
+ * U64_MAX means we are starting the read and have made no progress yet.
+ *
+ * The current btrfs_bio_is_contig() only uses disk_bytenr as
+ * the condition to check if the read can be merged with previous
+ * bio, which is not correct. E.g. two file extents pointing to the
+ * same extent but with different offset.
+ *
+ * So here we need to do extra checks to only merge reads that are
+ * covered by the same extent map.
+ * Just extent_map::start will be enough, as they are unique
+ * inside the same inode.
+ */
+ u64 last_em_start;
};
static void submit_one_bio(struct btrfs_bio_ctrl *bio_ctrl)
@@ -909,7 +927,7 @@ static void btrfs_readahead_expand(struct readahead_control *ractl,
* return 0 on success, otherwise return error
*/
static int btrfs_do_readpage(struct folio *folio, struct extent_map **em_cached,
- struct btrfs_bio_ctrl *bio_ctrl, u64 *prev_em_start)
+ struct btrfs_bio_ctrl *bio_ctrl)
{
struct inode *inode = folio->mapping->host;
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = inode_to_fs_info(inode);
@@ -1019,12 +1037,11 @@ static int btrfs_do_readpage(struct folio *folio, struct extent_map **em_cached,
* non-optimal behavior (submitting 2 bios for the same extent).
*/
if (compress_type != BTRFS_COMPRESS_NONE &&
- prev_em_start && *prev_em_start != (u64)-1 &&
- *prev_em_start != em->start)
+ bio_ctrl->last_em_start != U64_MAX &&
+ bio_ctrl->last_em_start != em->start)
force_bio_submit = true;
- if (prev_em_start)
- *prev_em_start = em->start;
+ bio_ctrl->last_em_start = em->start;
btrfs_free_extent_map(em);
em = NULL;
@@ -1238,12 +1255,15 @@ int btrfs_read_folio(struct file *file, struct folio *folio)
const u64 start = folio_pos(folio);
const u64 end = start + folio_size(folio) - 1;
struct extent_state *cached_state = NULL;
- struct btrfs_bio_ctrl bio_ctrl = { .opf = REQ_OP_READ };
+ struct btrfs_bio_ctrl bio_ctrl = {
+ .opf = REQ_OP_READ,
+ .last_em_start = U64_MAX,
+ };
struct extent_map *em_cached = NULL;
int ret;
lock_extents_for_read(inode, start, end, &cached_state);
- ret = btrfs_do_readpage(folio, &em_cached, &bio_ctrl, NULL);
+ ret = btrfs_do_readpage(folio, &em_cached, &bio_ctrl);
btrfs_unlock_extent(&inode->io_tree, start, end, &cached_state);
btrfs_free_extent_map(em_cached);
@@ -2583,7 +2603,8 @@ void btrfs_readahead(struct readahead_control *rac)
{
struct btrfs_bio_ctrl bio_ctrl = {
.opf = REQ_OP_READ | REQ_RAHEAD,
- .ractl = rac
+ .ractl = rac,
+ .last_em_start = U64_MAX,
};
struct folio *folio;
struct btrfs_inode *inode = BTRFS_I(rac->mapping->host);
@@ -2591,12 +2612,11 @@ void btrfs_readahead(struct readahead_control *rac)
const u64 end = start + readahead_length(rac) - 1;
struct extent_state *cached_state = NULL;
struct extent_map *em_cached = NULL;
- u64 prev_em_start = (u64)-1;
lock_extents_for_read(inode, start, end, &cached_state);
while ((folio = readahead_folio(rac)) != NULL)
- btrfs_do_readpage(folio, &em_cached, &bio_ctrl, &prev_em_start);
+ btrfs_do_readpage(folio, &em_cached, &bio_ctrl);
btrfs_unlock_extent(&inode->io_tree, start, end, &cached_state);
The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x fd779eac2d659668be4d3dbdac0710afd5d6db12
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025091346-runaround-croon-39cc@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From fd779eac2d659668be4d3dbdac0710afd5d6db12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin(a)gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 14:00:57 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] mtd: nand: raw: atmel: Respect tAR, tCLR in read setup timing
Having setup time 0 violates tAR, tCLR of some chips, for instance
TOSHIBA TC58NVG2S3ETAI0 cannot be detected successfully (first ID byte
being read duplicated, i.e. 98 98 dc 90 15 76 14 03 instead of
98 dc 90 15 76 ...).
Atmel Application Notes postulated 1 cycle NRD_SETUP without explanation
[1], but it looks more appropriate to just calculate setup time properly.
[1] Link: https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/aemDocuments/documents/MPU32/Applicatio…
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Fixes: f9ce2eddf176 ("mtd: nand: atmel: Add ->setup_data_interface() hooks")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin(a)siemens.com>
Tested-by: Alexander Dahl <ada(a)thorsis.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal(a)bootlin.com>
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c
index 84ab4a83cbd6..db94d14a3807 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c
@@ -1377,14 +1377,24 @@ static int atmel_smc_nand_prepare_smcconf(struct atmel_nand *nand,
if (ret)
return ret;
+ /*
+ * Read setup timing depends on the operation done on the NAND:
+ *
+ * NRD_SETUP = max(tAR, tCLR)
+ */
+ timeps = max(conf->timings.sdr.tAR_min, conf->timings.sdr.tCLR_min);
+ ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(timeps, mckperiodps);
+ totalcycles += ncycles;
+ ret = atmel_smc_cs_conf_set_setup(smcconf, ATMEL_SMC_NRD_SHIFT, ncycles);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
/*
* The read cycle timing is directly matching tRC, but is also
* dependent on the setup and hold timings we calculated earlier,
* which gives:
*
- * NRD_CYCLE = max(tRC, NRD_PULSE + NRD_HOLD)
- *
- * NRD_SETUP is always 0.
+ * NRD_CYCLE = max(tRC, NRD_SETUP + NRD_PULSE + NRD_HOLD)
*/
ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(conf->timings.sdr.tRC_min, mckperiodps);
ncycles = max(totalcycles, ncycles);