May 2025 - Linux-stable-mirror

[PATCH for 6.14.y] perf tools: Fix build error for LoongArch

by Tiezhu Yang

There exists the following error when building perf tools on LoongArch: CC util/syscalltbl.o In file included from util/syscalltbl.c:16: tools/perf/arch/loongarch/include/syscall_table.h:2:10: fatal error: asm/syscall_table_64.h: No such file or directory 2 | #include <asm/syscall_table_64.h> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ compilation terminated. This is because the generated syscall header is syscalls_64.h rather than syscall_table_64.h. The above problem was introduced from v6.14, then the header syscall_table.h has been removed from mainline tree in commit af472d3c4454 ("perf syscalltbl: Remove syscall_table.h"), just fix it only for the linux-6.14.y branch of stable tree. By the way, no need to fix the mainline tree and there is no upstream git id for this patch. How to reproduce: git clone https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git cd linux && git checkout origin/linux-6.14.y make JOBS=1 -C tools/perf Fixes: fa70857a27e5 ("perf tools loongarch: Use syscall table") Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu(a)loongson.cn> --- tools/perf/arch/loongarch/include/syscall_table.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/loongarch/include/syscall_table.h b/tools/perf/arch/loongarch/include/syscall_table.h index 9d0646d3455c..b53e31c15805 100644 --- a/tools/perf/arch/loongarch/include/syscall_table.h +++ b/tools/perf/arch/loongarch/include/syscall_table.h @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ -#include <asm/syscall_table_64.h> +#include <asm/syscalls_64.h> -- 2.42.0

3 months, 3 weeks

2
1
0 0

[PATCH 6.12.y] Bluetooth: btnxpuart: Fix kernel panic during FW release

by bin.lan.cn＠windriver.com

From: Neeraj Sanjay Kale <neeraj.sanjaykale(a)nxp.com> [ Upstream commit 1f77c05408c96bc0b58ae476a9cadc9e5b9cfd0f ] This fixes a kernel panic seen during release FW in a stress test scenario where WLAN and BT FW download occurs simultaneously, and due to a HW bug, chip sends out only 1 bootloader signatures. When driver receives the bootloader signature, it enters FW download mode, but since no consequtive bootloader signatures seen, FW file is not requested. After 60 seconds, when FW download times out, release_firmware causes a kernel panic. [ 2601.949184] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000312e6f006573 [ 2601.992076] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000111802000 [ 2601.992080] [0000312e6f006573] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 [ 2601.992087] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000021 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 2601.992091] Modules linked in: algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg btnxpuart(O) pciexxx(O) mlan(O) overlay fsl_jr_uio caam_jr caamkeyblob_desc caamhash_desc caamalg_desc crypto_engine authenc libdes crct10dif_ce polyval_ce snd_soc_fsl_easrc snd_soc_fsl_asoc_card imx8_media_dev(C) snd_soc_fsl_micfil polyval_generic snd_soc_fsl_xcvr snd_soc_fsl_sai snd_soc_imx_audmux snd_soc_fsl_asrc snd_soc_imx_card snd_soc_imx_hdmi snd_soc_fsl_aud2htx snd_soc_fsl_utils imx_pcm_dma dw_hdmi_cec flexcan can_dev [ 2602.001825] CPU: 2 PID: 20060 Comm: hciconfig Tainted: G C O 6.6.23-lts-next-06236-gb586a521770e #1 [ 2602.010182] Hardware name: NXP i.MX8MPlus EVK board (DT) [ 2602.010185] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 2602.010191] pc : _raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x68 [ 2602.010201] lr : free_fw_priv+0x20/0xfc [ 2602.020561] sp : ffff800089363b30 [ 2602.020563] x29: ffff800089363b30 x28: ffff0000d0eb5880 x27: 0000000000000000 [ 2602.020570] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff0000d728b330 x24: 0000000000000000 [ 2602.020577] x23: ffff0000dc856f38 [ 2602.033797] x22: ffff800089363b70 x21: ffff0000dc856000 [ 2602.033802] x20: ff00312e6f006573 x19: ffff0000d0d9ea80 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 2602.033809] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000aaaad80dd480 [ 2602.083320] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 00000000000001b9 x12: 0000000000000002 [ 2602.083326] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000a60 x9 : ffff800089363a30 [ 2602.083333] x8 : ffff0001793d75c0 x7 : ffff0000d6dbc400 x6 : 0000000000000000 [ 2602.083339] x5 : 00000000410fd030 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000001 [ 2602.083346] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000001 x0 : ff00312e6f006573 [ 2602.083354] Call trace: [ 2602.083356] _raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x68 [ 2602.083364] release_firmware+0x48/0x6c [ 2602.083370] nxp_setup+0x3c4/0x540 [btnxpuart] [ 2602.083383] hci_dev_open_sync+0xf0/0xa34 [ 2602.083391] hci_dev_open+0xd8/0x178 [ 2602.083399] hci_sock_ioctl+0x3b0/0x590 [ 2602.083405] sock_do_ioctl+0x60/0x118 [ 2602.083413] sock_ioctl+0x2f4/0x374 [ 2602.091430] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xac/0xf0 [ 2602.091437] invoke_syscall+0x48/0x110 [ 2602.091445] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc0/0xe0 [ 2602.091452] do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 [ 2602.091457] el0_svc+0x40/0xe4 [ 2602.091465] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x12c [ 2602.091470] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 Fixes: e3c4891098c8 ("Bluetooth: btnxpuart: Handle FW Download Abort scenario") Fixes: 689ca16e5232 ("Bluetooth: NXP: Add protocol support for NXP Bluetooth chipsets") Signed-off-by: Neeraj Sanjay Kale <neeraj.sanjaykale(a)nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bin Lan <bin.lan.cn(a)windriver.com> Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he(a)windriver.com> --- Build test passed. --- drivers/bluetooth/btnxpuart.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btnxpuart.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btnxpuart.c index 84a1ad61c4ad..56b875a6b1fb 100644 --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btnxpuart.c +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btnxpuart.c @@ -612,8 +612,10 @@ static int nxp_download_firmware(struct hci_dev *hdev) &nxpdev->tx_state), msecs_to_jiffies(60000)); - release_firmware(nxpdev->fw); - memset(nxpdev->fw_name, 0, sizeof(nxpdev->fw_name)); + if (nxpdev->fw && strlen(nxpdev->fw_name)) { + release_firmware(nxpdev->fw); + memset(nxpdev->fw_name, 0, sizeof(nxpdev->fw_name)); + } if (err == 0) { bt_dev_err(hdev, "FW Download Timeout. offset: %d", -- 2.34.1

3 months, 3 weeks

2
1
0 0

[PATCH 5.15.y] sctp: add mutual exclusion in proc_sctp_do_udp_port()

by jianqi.ren.cn＠windriver.com

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 10206302af856791fbcc27a33ed3c3eb09b2793d ] We must serialize calls to sctp_udp_sock_stop() and sctp_udp_sock_start() or risk a crash as syzbot reported: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc000000000d: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000068-0x000000000000006f] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 6551 Comm: syz.1.44 Not tainted 6.14.0-syzkaller-g7f2ff7b62617 #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/12/2025 RIP: 0010:kernel_sock_shutdown+0x47/0x70 net/socket.c:3653 Call Trace: <TASK> udp_tunnel_sock_release+0x68/0x80 net/ipv4/udp_tunnel_core.c:181 sctp_udp_sock_stop+0x71/0x160 net/sctp/protocol.c:930 proc_sctp_do_udp_port+0x264/0x450 net/sctp/sysctl.c:553 proc_sys_call_handler+0x3d0/0x5b0 fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c:601 iter_file_splice_write+0x91c/0x1150 fs/splice.c:738 do_splice_from fs/splice.c:935 [inline] direct_splice_actor+0x18f/0x6c0 fs/splice.c:1158 splice_direct_to_actor+0x342/0xa30 fs/splice.c:1102 do_splice_direct_actor fs/splice.c:1201 [inline] do_splice_direct+0x174/0x240 fs/splice.c:1227 do_sendfile+0xafd/0xe50 fs/read_write.c:1368 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1429 [inline] __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1415 [inline] __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1d8/0x220 fs/read_write.c:1415 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] Fixes: 046c052b475e ("sctp: enable udp tunneling socks") Reported-by: syzbot+fae49d997eb56fa7c74d(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/67ea5c01.050a0220.1547ec.012b.GAE@google.com… Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com> Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner(a)gmail.com> Acked-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin(a)gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250331091532.224982-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> [Minor conflict resolved due to code context change.] Signed-off-by: Jianqi Ren <jianqi.ren.cn(a)windriver.com> Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he(a)windriver.com> --- Verified the build test --- net/sctp/sysctl.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/sctp/sysctl.c b/net/sctp/sysctl.c index 916dc2e81e42..f3d09998c24d 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sysctl.c +++ b/net/sctp/sysctl.c @@ -518,6 +518,8 @@ static int proc_sctp_do_auth(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write, return ret; } +static DEFINE_MUTEX(sctp_sysctl_mutex); + static int proc_sctp_do_udp_port(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write, void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos) { @@ -542,6 +544,7 @@ static int proc_sctp_do_udp_port(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write, if (new_value > max || new_value < min) return -EINVAL; + mutex_lock(&sctp_sysctl_mutex); net->sctp.udp_port = new_value; sctp_udp_sock_stop(net); if (new_value) { @@ -554,6 +557,7 @@ static int proc_sctp_do_udp_port(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write, lock_sock(sk); sctp_sk(sk)->udp_port = htons(net->sctp.udp_port); release_sock(sk); + mutex_unlock(&sctp_sysctl_mutex); } return ret; -- 2.34.1

3 months, 3 weeks

2
1
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.12.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x fefc075182275057ce607effaa3daa9e6e3bdc73 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025051945-yiddish-xerox-03f5@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.12.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From fefc075182275057ce607effaa3daa9e6e3bdc73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov(a)linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 16:32:07 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory handling The page allocator tracks the number of zones that have unaccepted memory using static_branch_enc/dec() and uses that static branch in hot paths to determine if it needs to deal with unaccepted memory. Borislav and Thomas pointed out that the tracking is racy: operations on static_branch are not serialized against adding/removing unaccepted pages to/from the zone. Sanity checks inside static_branch machinery detects it: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at kernel/jump_label.c:276 __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked+0x8e/0xa0 The comment around the WARN() explains the problem: /* * Warn about the '-1' case though; since that means a * decrement is concurrent with a first (0->1) increment. IOW * people are trying to disable something that wasn't yet fully * enabled. This suggests an ordering problem on the user side. */ The effect of this static_branch optimization is only visible on microbenchmark. Instead of adding more complexity around it, remove it altogether. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250506133207.1009676-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.in… Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov(a)linux.intel.com> Fixes: dcdfdd40fa82 ("mm: Add support for unaccepted memory") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250506092445.GBaBnVXXyvnazly6iF@fat_crate.loc… Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)alien8.de> Tested-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp(a)alien8.de> Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka(a)suse.cz> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb(a)google.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko(a)suse.com> Cc: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb(a)google.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes(a)cmpxchg.org> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> [6.5+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h index 25a29872c634..5c7a2b43ad76 100644 --- a/mm/internal.h +++ b/mm/internal.h @@ -1590,7 +1590,6 @@ unsigned long move_page_tables(struct pagetable_move_control *pmc); #ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY void accept_page(struct page *page); -void unaccepted_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *work); #else /* CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY */ static inline void accept_page(struct page *page) { diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c index 327764ca0ee4..eedce9321e13 100644 --- a/mm/mm_init.c +++ b/mm/mm_init.c @@ -1441,7 +1441,6 @@ static void __meminit zone_init_free_lists(struct zone *zone) #ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY INIT_LIST_HEAD(&zone->unaccepted_pages); - INIT_WORK(&zone->unaccepted_cleanup, unaccepted_cleanup_work); #endif } diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 7248e300d36e..8258349e49ac 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -7172,16 +7172,8 @@ bool has_managed_dma(void) #ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY -/* Counts number of zones with unaccepted pages. */ -static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(zones_with_unaccepted_pages); - static bool lazy_accept = true; -void unaccepted_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *work) -{ - static_branch_dec(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages); -} - static int __init accept_memory_parse(char *p) { if (!strcmp(p, "lazy")) { @@ -7206,11 +7198,7 @@ static bool page_contains_unaccepted(struct page *page, unsigned int order) static void __accept_page(struct zone *zone, unsigned long *flags, struct page *page) { - bool last; - list_del(&page->lru); - last = list_empty(&zone->unaccepted_pages); - account_freepages(zone, -MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES, MIGRATE_MOVABLE); __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_UNACCEPTED, -MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES); __ClearPageUnaccepted(page); @@ -7219,28 +7207,6 @@ static void __accept_page(struct zone *zone, unsigned long *flags, accept_memory(page_to_phys(page), PAGE_SIZE << MAX_PAGE_ORDER); __free_pages_ok(page, MAX_PAGE_ORDER, FPI_TO_TAIL); - - if (last) { - /* - * There are two corner cases: - * - * - If allocation occurs during the CPU bring up, - * static_branch_dec() cannot be used directly as - * it causes a deadlock on cpu_hotplug_lock. - * - * Instead, use schedule_work() to prevent deadlock. - * - * - If allocation occurs before workqueues are initialized, - * static_branch_dec() should be called directly. - * - * Workqueues are initialized before CPU bring up, so this - * will not conflict with the first scenario. - */ - if (system_wq) - schedule_work(&zone->unaccepted_cleanup); - else - unaccepted_cleanup_work(&zone->unaccepted_cleanup); - } } void accept_page(struct page *page) @@ -7277,20 +7243,12 @@ static bool try_to_accept_memory_one(struct zone *zone) return true; } -static inline bool has_unaccepted_memory(void) -{ - return static_branch_unlikely(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages); -} - static bool cond_accept_memory(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags) { long to_accept, wmark; bool ret = false; - if (!has_unaccepted_memory()) - return false; - if (list_empty(&zone->unaccepted_pages)) return false; @@ -7328,22 +7286,17 @@ static bool __free_unaccepted(struct page *page) { struct zone *zone = page_zone(page); unsigned long flags; - bool first = false; if (!lazy_accept) return false; spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags); - first = list_empty(&zone->unaccepted_pages); list_add_tail(&page->lru, &zone->unaccepted_pages); account_freepages(zone, MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES, MIGRATE_MOVABLE); __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_UNACCEPTED, MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES); __SetPageUnaccepted(page); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags); - if (first) - static_branch_inc(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages); - return true; }

3 months, 3 weeks

3
2
0 0

[PATCH 6.6.y] sctp: add mutual exclusion in proc_sctp_do_udp_port()

by jianqi.ren.cn＠windriver.com

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 10206302af856791fbcc27a33ed3c3eb09b2793d ] We must serialize calls to sctp_udp_sock_stop() and sctp_udp_sock_start() or risk a crash as syzbot reported: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc000000000d: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000068-0x000000000000006f] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 6551 Comm: syz.1.44 Not tainted 6.14.0-syzkaller-g7f2ff7b62617 #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/12/2025 RIP: 0010:kernel_sock_shutdown+0x47/0x70 net/socket.c:3653 Call Trace: <TASK> udp_tunnel_sock_release+0x68/0x80 net/ipv4/udp_tunnel_core.c:181 sctp_udp_sock_stop+0x71/0x160 net/sctp/protocol.c:930 proc_sctp_do_udp_port+0x264/0x450 net/sctp/sysctl.c:553 proc_sys_call_handler+0x3d0/0x5b0 fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c:601 iter_file_splice_write+0x91c/0x1150 fs/splice.c:738 do_splice_from fs/splice.c:935 [inline] direct_splice_actor+0x18f/0x6c0 fs/splice.c:1158 splice_direct_to_actor+0x342/0xa30 fs/splice.c:1102 do_splice_direct_actor fs/splice.c:1201 [inline] do_splice_direct+0x174/0x240 fs/splice.c:1227 do_sendfile+0xafd/0xe50 fs/read_write.c:1368 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1429 [inline] __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1415 [inline] __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1d8/0x220 fs/read_write.c:1415 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] Fixes: 046c052b475e ("sctp: enable udp tunneling socks") Reported-by: syzbot+fae49d997eb56fa7c74d(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/67ea5c01.050a0220.1547ec.012b.GAE@google.com… Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com> Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner(a)gmail.com> Acked-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin(a)gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250331091532.224982-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> [Minor conflict resolved due to code context change.] Signed-off-by: Jianqi Ren <jianqi.ren.cn(a)windriver.com> Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he(a)windriver.com> --- Verified the build test --- net/sctp/sysctl.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/sctp/sysctl.c b/net/sctp/sysctl.c index fd73be940f46..77a76634014a 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sysctl.c +++ b/net/sctp/sysctl.c @@ -529,6 +529,8 @@ static int proc_sctp_do_auth(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write, return ret; } +static DEFINE_MUTEX(sctp_sysctl_mutex); + static int proc_sctp_do_udp_port(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write, void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos) { @@ -553,6 +555,7 @@ static int proc_sctp_do_udp_port(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write, if (new_value > max || new_value < min) return -EINVAL; + mutex_lock(&sctp_sysctl_mutex); net->sctp.udp_port = new_value; sctp_udp_sock_stop(net); if (new_value) { @@ -565,6 +568,7 @@ static int proc_sctp_do_udp_port(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write, lock_sock(sk); sctp_sk(sk)->udp_port = htons(net->sctp.udp_port); release_sock(sk); + mutex_unlock(&sctp_sysctl_mutex); } return ret; -- 2.34.1

3 months, 3 weeks

2
1
0 0

[PATCH -stable,5.10 0/3] Netfilter fixes for -stable

by Pablo Neira Ayuso

Hi Greg, Sasha, This batch contains a backport fix for 5.10 -stable. The following list shows the backported patches, I am using original commit IDs for reference: 1) 8965d42bcf54 ("netfilter: nf_tables: pass nft_chain to destroy function, not nft_ctx") This is a stable dependency for the next patch. 2) c03d278fdf35 ("netfilter: nf_tables: wait for rcu grace period on net_device removal") 3) b04df3da1b5c ("netfilter: nf_tables: do not defer rule destruction via call_rcu") This is a fix-for-fix for patch 2. These three patches are required to fix the netdevice release path for netdev family basechains. Please, apply, Thanks Florian Westphal (2): netfilter: nf_tables: pass nft_chain to destroy function, not nft_ctx netfilter: nf_tables: do not defer rule destruction via call_rcu Pablo Neira Ayuso (1): netfilter: nf_tables: wait for rcu grace period on net_device removal include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h | 2 +- net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------- net/netfilter/nft_immediate.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) -- 2.30.2

3 months, 3 weeks

2
6
0 0

[PATCH -stable,6.1 0/3] Netfilter fixes for -stable

by Pablo Neira Ayuso

Hi Greg, Sasha, This batch contains backported fixes for 6.1 -stable. The following list shows the backported patches, I am using original commit IDs for reference: 1) 8965d42bcf54 ("netfilter: nf_tables: pass nft_chain to destroy function, not nft_ctx") This is a stable dependency for the next patch. 2) c03d278fdf35 ("netfilter: nf_tables: wait for rcu grace period on net_device removal") 3) b04df3da1b5c ("netfilter: nf_tables: do not defer rule destruction via call_rcu") This is a fix-for-fix for patch 2. These three patches are required to fix the netdevice release path for netdev family basechains. Please, apply, Thanks Florian Westphal (2): netfilter: nf_tables: pass nft_chain to destroy function, not nft_ctx netfilter: nf_tables: do not defer rule destruction via call_rcu Pablo Neira Ayuso (1): netfilter: nf_tables: wait for rcu grace period on net_device removal include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h | 3 +- net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------- net/netfilter/nft_immediate.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) -- 2.30.2

3 months, 3 weeks

3
7
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x fefc075182275057ce607effaa3daa9e6e3bdc73 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025051947-dimly-marina-9d5e@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From fefc075182275057ce607effaa3daa9e6e3bdc73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov(a)linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 16:32:07 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory handling The page allocator tracks the number of zones that have unaccepted memory using static_branch_enc/dec() and uses that static branch in hot paths to determine if it needs to deal with unaccepted memory. Borislav and Thomas pointed out that the tracking is racy: operations on static_branch are not serialized against adding/removing unaccepted pages to/from the zone. Sanity checks inside static_branch machinery detects it: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at kernel/jump_label.c:276 __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked+0x8e/0xa0 The comment around the WARN() explains the problem: /* * Warn about the '-1' case though; since that means a * decrement is concurrent with a first (0->1) increment. IOW * people are trying to disable something that wasn't yet fully * enabled. This suggests an ordering problem on the user side. */ The effect of this static_branch optimization is only visible on microbenchmark. Instead of adding more complexity around it, remove it altogether. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250506133207.1009676-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.in… Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov(a)linux.intel.com> Fixes: dcdfdd40fa82 ("mm: Add support for unaccepted memory") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250506092445.GBaBnVXXyvnazly6iF@fat_crate.loc… Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)alien8.de> Tested-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp(a)alien8.de> Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka(a)suse.cz> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb(a)google.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko(a)suse.com> Cc: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb(a)google.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes(a)cmpxchg.org> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> [6.5+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h index 25a29872c634..5c7a2b43ad76 100644 --- a/mm/internal.h +++ b/mm/internal.h @@ -1590,7 +1590,6 @@ unsigned long move_page_tables(struct pagetable_move_control *pmc); #ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY void accept_page(struct page *page); -void unaccepted_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *work); #else /* CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY */ static inline void accept_page(struct page *page) { diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c index 327764ca0ee4..eedce9321e13 100644 --- a/mm/mm_init.c +++ b/mm/mm_init.c @@ -1441,7 +1441,6 @@ static void __meminit zone_init_free_lists(struct zone *zone) #ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY INIT_LIST_HEAD(&zone->unaccepted_pages); - INIT_WORK(&zone->unaccepted_cleanup, unaccepted_cleanup_work); #endif } diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 7248e300d36e..8258349e49ac 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -7172,16 +7172,8 @@ bool has_managed_dma(void) #ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY -/* Counts number of zones with unaccepted pages. */ -static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(zones_with_unaccepted_pages); - static bool lazy_accept = true; -void unaccepted_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *work) -{ - static_branch_dec(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages); -} - static int __init accept_memory_parse(char *p) { if (!strcmp(p, "lazy")) { @@ -7206,11 +7198,7 @@ static bool page_contains_unaccepted(struct page *page, unsigned int order) static void __accept_page(struct zone *zone, unsigned long *flags, struct page *page) { - bool last; - list_del(&page->lru); - last = list_empty(&zone->unaccepted_pages); - account_freepages(zone, -MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES, MIGRATE_MOVABLE); __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_UNACCEPTED, -MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES); __ClearPageUnaccepted(page); @@ -7219,28 +7207,6 @@ static void __accept_page(struct zone *zone, unsigned long *flags, accept_memory(page_to_phys(page), PAGE_SIZE << MAX_PAGE_ORDER); __free_pages_ok(page, MAX_PAGE_ORDER, FPI_TO_TAIL); - - if (last) { - /* - * There are two corner cases: - * - * - If allocation occurs during the CPU bring up, - * static_branch_dec() cannot be used directly as - * it causes a deadlock on cpu_hotplug_lock. - * - * Instead, use schedule_work() to prevent deadlock. - * - * - If allocation occurs before workqueues are initialized, - * static_branch_dec() should be called directly. - * - * Workqueues are initialized before CPU bring up, so this - * will not conflict with the first scenario. - */ - if (system_wq) - schedule_work(&zone->unaccepted_cleanup); - else - unaccepted_cleanup_work(&zone->unaccepted_cleanup); - } } void accept_page(struct page *page) @@ -7277,20 +7243,12 @@ static bool try_to_accept_memory_one(struct zone *zone) return true; } -static inline bool has_unaccepted_memory(void) -{ - return static_branch_unlikely(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages); -} - static bool cond_accept_memory(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags) { long to_accept, wmark; bool ret = false; - if (!has_unaccepted_memory()) - return false; - if (list_empty(&zone->unaccepted_pages)) return false; @@ -7328,22 +7286,17 @@ static bool __free_unaccepted(struct page *page) { struct zone *zone = page_zone(page); unsigned long flags; - bool first = false; if (!lazy_accept) return false; spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags); - first = list_empty(&zone->unaccepted_pages); list_add_tail(&page->lru, &zone->unaccepted_pages); account_freepages(zone, MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES, MIGRATE_MOVABLE); __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_UNACCEPTED, MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES); __SetPageUnaccepted(page); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags); - if (first) - static_branch_inc(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages); - return true; }

3 months, 3 weeks

3
2
0 0

[PATCH 6.1.y] sctp: add mutual exclusion in proc_sctp_do_udp_port()

by jianqi.ren.cn＠windriver.com

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 10206302af856791fbcc27a33ed3c3eb09b2793d ] We must serialize calls to sctp_udp_sock_stop() and sctp_udp_sock_start() or risk a crash as syzbot reported: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc000000000d: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000068-0x000000000000006f] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 6551 Comm: syz.1.44 Not tainted 6.14.0-syzkaller-g7f2ff7b62617 #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/12/2025 RIP: 0010:kernel_sock_shutdown+0x47/0x70 net/socket.c:3653 Call Trace: <TASK> udp_tunnel_sock_release+0x68/0x80 net/ipv4/udp_tunnel_core.c:181 sctp_udp_sock_stop+0x71/0x160 net/sctp/protocol.c:930 proc_sctp_do_udp_port+0x264/0x450 net/sctp/sysctl.c:553 proc_sys_call_handler+0x3d0/0x5b0 fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c:601 iter_file_splice_write+0x91c/0x1150 fs/splice.c:738 do_splice_from fs/splice.c:935 [inline] direct_splice_actor+0x18f/0x6c0 fs/splice.c:1158 splice_direct_to_actor+0x342/0xa30 fs/splice.c:1102 do_splice_direct_actor fs/splice.c:1201 [inline] do_splice_direct+0x174/0x240 fs/splice.c:1227 do_sendfile+0xafd/0xe50 fs/read_write.c:1368 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1429 [inline] __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1415 [inline] __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1d8/0x220 fs/read_write.c:1415 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] Fixes: 046c052b475e ("sctp: enable udp tunneling socks") Reported-by: syzbot+fae49d997eb56fa7c74d(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/67ea5c01.050a0220.1547ec.012b.GAE@google.com… Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com> Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner(a)gmail.com> Acked-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin(a)gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250331091532.224982-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> [Minor conflict resolved due to code context change.] Signed-off-by: Jianqi Ren <jianqi.ren.cn(a)windriver.com> Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he(a)windriver.com> --- Verified the build test --- net/sctp/sysctl.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/sctp/sysctl.c b/net/sctp/sysctl.c index 916dc2e81e42..f3d09998c24d 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sysctl.c +++ b/net/sctp/sysctl.c @@ -518,6 +518,8 @@ static int proc_sctp_do_auth(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write, return ret; } +static DEFINE_MUTEX(sctp_sysctl_mutex); + static int proc_sctp_do_udp_port(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write, void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos) { @@ -542,6 +544,7 @@ static int proc_sctp_do_udp_port(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write, if (new_value > max || new_value < min) return -EINVAL; + mutex_lock(&sctp_sysctl_mutex); net->sctp.udp_port = new_value; sctp_udp_sock_stop(net); if (new_value) { @@ -554,6 +557,7 @@ static int proc_sctp_do_udp_port(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write, lock_sock(sk); sctp_sk(sk)->udp_port = htons(net->sctp.udp_port); release_sock(sk); + mutex_unlock(&sctp_sysctl_mutex); } return ret; -- 2.34.1

3 months, 3 weeks

2
1
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory" failed to apply to 6.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.14.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x fefc075182275057ce607effaa3daa9e6e3bdc73 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025051944-undone-repayment-6c7e@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.14.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From fefc075182275057ce607effaa3daa9e6e3bdc73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov(a)linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 16:32:07 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory handling The page allocator tracks the number of zones that have unaccepted memory using static_branch_enc/dec() and uses that static branch in hot paths to determine if it needs to deal with unaccepted memory. Borislav and Thomas pointed out that the tracking is racy: operations on static_branch are not serialized against adding/removing unaccepted pages to/from the zone. Sanity checks inside static_branch machinery detects it: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at kernel/jump_label.c:276 __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked+0x8e/0xa0 The comment around the WARN() explains the problem: /* * Warn about the '-1' case though; since that means a * decrement is concurrent with a first (0->1) increment. IOW * people are trying to disable something that wasn't yet fully * enabled. This suggests an ordering problem on the user side. */ The effect of this static_branch optimization is only visible on microbenchmark. Instead of adding more complexity around it, remove it altogether. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250506133207.1009676-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.in… Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov(a)linux.intel.com> Fixes: dcdfdd40fa82 ("mm: Add support for unaccepted memory") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250506092445.GBaBnVXXyvnazly6iF@fat_crate.loc… Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)alien8.de> Tested-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp(a)alien8.de> Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka(a)suse.cz> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb(a)google.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko(a)suse.com> Cc: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb(a)google.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes(a)cmpxchg.org> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> [6.5+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h index 25a29872c634..5c7a2b43ad76 100644 --- a/mm/internal.h +++ b/mm/internal.h @@ -1590,7 +1590,6 @@ unsigned long move_page_tables(struct pagetable_move_control *pmc); #ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY void accept_page(struct page *page); -void unaccepted_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *work); #else /* CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY */ static inline void accept_page(struct page *page) { diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c index 327764ca0ee4..eedce9321e13 100644 --- a/mm/mm_init.c +++ b/mm/mm_init.c @@ -1441,7 +1441,6 @@ static void __meminit zone_init_free_lists(struct zone *zone) #ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY INIT_LIST_HEAD(&zone->unaccepted_pages); - INIT_WORK(&zone->unaccepted_cleanup, unaccepted_cleanup_work); #endif } diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 7248e300d36e..8258349e49ac 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -7172,16 +7172,8 @@ bool has_managed_dma(void) #ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY -/* Counts number of zones with unaccepted pages. */ -static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(zones_with_unaccepted_pages); - static bool lazy_accept = true; -void unaccepted_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *work) -{ - static_branch_dec(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages); -} - static int __init accept_memory_parse(char *p) { if (!strcmp(p, "lazy")) { @@ -7206,11 +7198,7 @@ static bool page_contains_unaccepted(struct page *page, unsigned int order) static void __accept_page(struct zone *zone, unsigned long *flags, struct page *page) { - bool last; - list_del(&page->lru); - last = list_empty(&zone->unaccepted_pages); - account_freepages(zone, -MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES, MIGRATE_MOVABLE); __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_UNACCEPTED, -MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES); __ClearPageUnaccepted(page); @@ -7219,28 +7207,6 @@ static void __accept_page(struct zone *zone, unsigned long *flags, accept_memory(page_to_phys(page), PAGE_SIZE << MAX_PAGE_ORDER); __free_pages_ok(page, MAX_PAGE_ORDER, FPI_TO_TAIL); - - if (last) { - /* - * There are two corner cases: - * - * - If allocation occurs during the CPU bring up, - * static_branch_dec() cannot be used directly as - * it causes a deadlock on cpu_hotplug_lock. - * - * Instead, use schedule_work() to prevent deadlock. - * - * - If allocation occurs before workqueues are initialized, - * static_branch_dec() should be called directly. - * - * Workqueues are initialized before CPU bring up, so this - * will not conflict with the first scenario. - */ - if (system_wq) - schedule_work(&zone->unaccepted_cleanup); - else - unaccepted_cleanup_work(&zone->unaccepted_cleanup); - } } void accept_page(struct page *page) @@ -7277,20 +7243,12 @@ static bool try_to_accept_memory_one(struct zone *zone) return true; } -static inline bool has_unaccepted_memory(void) -{ - return static_branch_unlikely(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages); -} - static bool cond_accept_memory(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags) { long to_accept, wmark; bool ret = false; - if (!has_unaccepted_memory()) - return false; - if (list_empty(&zone->unaccepted_pages)) return false; @@ -7328,22 +7286,17 @@ static bool __free_unaccepted(struct page *page) { struct zone *zone = page_zone(page); unsigned long flags; - bool first = false; if (!lazy_accept) return false; spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags); - first = list_empty(&zone->unaccepted_pages); list_add_tail(&page->lru, &zone->unaccepted_pages); account_freepages(zone, MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES, MIGRATE_MOVABLE); __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_UNACCEPTED, MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES); __SetPageUnaccepted(page); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags); - if (first) - static_branch_inc(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages); - return true; }

3 months, 3 weeks

3
2
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror May 2025