The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.12.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x ffcef3df680c437ca33ff434be18ec24d72907c2
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025032627-charm-hesitancy-d3bf@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.12.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From ffcef3df680c437ca33ff434be18ec24d72907c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dragan Simic <dsimic(a)manjaro.org>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 19:48:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add missing PCIe supplies to RockPro64
board dtsi
Add missing "vpcie0v9-supply" and "vpcie1v8-supply" properties to the "pcie0"
node in the Pine64 RockPro64 board dtsi file. This eliminates the following
warnings from the kernel log:
rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie1v8 not found, using dummy regulator
rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie0v9 not found, using dummy regulator
These additions improve the accuracy of hardware description of the RockPro64
and, in theory, they should result in no functional changes to the way board
works after the changes, because the "vcca_0v9" and "vcca_1v8" regulators are
always enabled. [1][2] However, extended reliability testing, performed by
Chris, [3] has proven that the age-old issues with some PCI Express cards,
when used with a Pine64 RockPro64, are also resolved.
Those issues were already mentioned in the commit 43853e843aa6 (arm64: dts:
rockchip: Remove unsupported node from the Pinebook Pro dts, 2024-04-01),
together with a brief description of the out-of-tree enumeration delay patch
that reportedly resolves those issues. In a nutshell, booting a RockPro64
with some PCI Express cards attached to it caused a kernel oops. [4]
Symptomatically enough, to the commit author's best knowledge, only the Pine64
RockPro64, out of all RK3399-based boards and devices supported upstream, has
been reported to suffer from those PCI Express issues, and only the RockPro64
had some of the PCI Express supplies missing in its DT. Thus, perhaps some
weird timing issues exist that caused the "vcca_1v8" always-on regulator,
which is part of the RK808 PMIC, to actually not be enabled before the PCI
Express is initialized and enumerated on the RockPro64, causing oopses with
some PCIe cards, and the aforementioned enumeration delay patch [4] probably
acted as just a workaround for the underlying timing issue.
Admittedly, the Pine64 RockPro64 is a bit specific board by having a standard
PCI Express slot, allowing use of various standard cards, but pretty much
standard PCI Express cards have been attached to other RK3399 boards as well,
and the commit author is unaware ot such issues reported for them.
It's quite hard to be sure that the PCI Express issues are fully resolved by
these additions to the DT, without some really extensive and time-consuming
testing. However, these additions to the DT can result in good things and
improvements anyway, making them perfectly safe from the standpoint of being
unable to do any harm or cause some unforeseen regressions.
These changes apply to the both supported hardware revisions of the Pine64
RockPro64, i.e. to the production-run revisions 2.0 and 2.1. [1][2]
[1] https://files.pine64.org/doc/rockpro64/rockpro64_v21-SCH.pdf
[2] https://files.pine64.org/doc/rockpro64/rockpro64_v20-SCH.pdf
[3] https://z9.de/hedgedoc/s/nF4d5G7rg#reboot-tests-for-PCIe-improvements
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230509153912.515218-1-vincenzopalazzodev@gma…
Fixes: bba821f5479e ("arm64: dts: rockchip: add PCIe nodes on rk3399-rockpro64")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev(a)gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Geis <pgwipeout(a)gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas(a)kernel.org>
Reported-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian(a)cknow.org>
Tested-by: Chris Vogel <chris(a)z9.de>
Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic(a)manjaro.org>
Tested-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian(a)cknow.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b39cfd7490d8194f053bf3971f13a43472d1769e.17409410…
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko(a)sntech.de>
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi
index 47dc198706c8..51c6aa26d828 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi
@@ -673,6 +673,8 @@ &pcie0 {
num-lanes = <4>;
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_perst>;
+ vpcie0v9-supply = <&vcca_0v9>;
+ vpcie1v8-supply = <&vcca_1v8>;
vpcie12v-supply = <&vcc12v_dcin>;
vpcie3v3-supply = <&vcc3v3_pcie>;
status = "okay";
The patch below does not apply to the 6.13-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.13.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x ffcef3df680c437ca33ff434be18ec24d72907c2
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025032626-glare-splotchy-ee9a@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.13.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From ffcef3df680c437ca33ff434be18ec24d72907c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dragan Simic <dsimic(a)manjaro.org>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 19:48:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add missing PCIe supplies to RockPro64
board dtsi
Add missing "vpcie0v9-supply" and "vpcie1v8-supply" properties to the "pcie0"
node in the Pine64 RockPro64 board dtsi file. This eliminates the following
warnings from the kernel log:
rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie1v8 not found, using dummy regulator
rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie0v9 not found, using dummy regulator
These additions improve the accuracy of hardware description of the RockPro64
and, in theory, they should result in no functional changes to the way board
works after the changes, because the "vcca_0v9" and "vcca_1v8" regulators are
always enabled. [1][2] However, extended reliability testing, performed by
Chris, [3] has proven that the age-old issues with some PCI Express cards,
when used with a Pine64 RockPro64, are also resolved.
Those issues were already mentioned in the commit 43853e843aa6 (arm64: dts:
rockchip: Remove unsupported node from the Pinebook Pro dts, 2024-04-01),
together with a brief description of the out-of-tree enumeration delay patch
that reportedly resolves those issues. In a nutshell, booting a RockPro64
with some PCI Express cards attached to it caused a kernel oops. [4]
Symptomatically enough, to the commit author's best knowledge, only the Pine64
RockPro64, out of all RK3399-based boards and devices supported upstream, has
been reported to suffer from those PCI Express issues, and only the RockPro64
had some of the PCI Express supplies missing in its DT. Thus, perhaps some
weird timing issues exist that caused the "vcca_1v8" always-on regulator,
which is part of the RK808 PMIC, to actually not be enabled before the PCI
Express is initialized and enumerated on the RockPro64, causing oopses with
some PCIe cards, and the aforementioned enumeration delay patch [4] probably
acted as just a workaround for the underlying timing issue.
Admittedly, the Pine64 RockPro64 is a bit specific board by having a standard
PCI Express slot, allowing use of various standard cards, but pretty much
standard PCI Express cards have been attached to other RK3399 boards as well,
and the commit author is unaware ot such issues reported for them.
It's quite hard to be sure that the PCI Express issues are fully resolved by
these additions to the DT, without some really extensive and time-consuming
testing. However, these additions to the DT can result in good things and
improvements anyway, making them perfectly safe from the standpoint of being
unable to do any harm or cause some unforeseen regressions.
These changes apply to the both supported hardware revisions of the Pine64
RockPro64, i.e. to the production-run revisions 2.0 and 2.1. [1][2]
[1] https://files.pine64.org/doc/rockpro64/rockpro64_v21-SCH.pdf
[2] https://files.pine64.org/doc/rockpro64/rockpro64_v20-SCH.pdf
[3] https://z9.de/hedgedoc/s/nF4d5G7rg#reboot-tests-for-PCIe-improvements
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230509153912.515218-1-vincenzopalazzodev@gma…
Fixes: bba821f5479e ("arm64: dts: rockchip: add PCIe nodes on rk3399-rockpro64")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev(a)gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Geis <pgwipeout(a)gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas(a)kernel.org>
Reported-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian(a)cknow.org>
Tested-by: Chris Vogel <chris(a)z9.de>
Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic(a)manjaro.org>
Tested-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian(a)cknow.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b39cfd7490d8194f053bf3971f13a43472d1769e.17409410…
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko(a)sntech.de>
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi
index 47dc198706c8..51c6aa26d828 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi
@@ -673,6 +673,8 @@ &pcie0 {
num-lanes = <4>;
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_perst>;
+ vpcie0v9-supply = <&vcca_0v9>;
+ vpcie1v8-supply = <&vcca_1v8>;
vpcie12v-supply = <&vcc12v_dcin>;
vpcie3v3-supply = <&vcc3v3_pcie>;
status = "okay";
The JIT compile of ldimm instructions can be anywhere between 1-5
instructions long depending on the value being loaded.
arch_bpf_trampoline_size() provides JIT size of the BPF trampoline
before the buffer for JIT'ing it is allocated. BPF trampoline JIT
code has ldimm instructions that need to load the value of pointer
to struct bpf_tramp_image. But this pointer value is not same while
calling arch_bpf_trampoline_size() & arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline().
So, the size arrived at using arch_bpf_trampoline_size() can vary
from the size needed in arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(). When the
number of ldimm instructions emitted in arch_bpf_trampoline_size()
is less than the number of ldimm instructions emitted during the
actual JIT compile of trampoline, the below warning is produced:
WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 204190 at arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:981 __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline.isra.0+0xd2c/0xdcc
which is:
/* Make sure the trampoline generation logic doesn't overflow */
if (image && WARN_ON_ONCE(&image[ctx->idx] >
(u32 *)rw_image_end - BPF_INSN_SAFETY)) {
Pass NULL as the first argument to __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline()
call from arch_bpf_trampoline_size() function, to differentiate it
from how arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() calls it and ensure maximum
possible instructions are emitted in arch_bpf_trampoline_size() for
ldimm instructions that load a different value during the actual JIT
compile of BPF trampoline.
Fixes: d243b62b7bd3 ("powerpc64/bpf: Add support for bpf trampolines")
Reported-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88(a)linux.ibm.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6168bfc8-659f-4b5a-a6fb-90a916dde3b3@linux.ibm.…
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # v6.13+
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini(a)linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 2991bb171a9b..49d7e9a8d17c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *rw_im
* [ ] --
* LR save area [ r0 save (64-bit) ] | header
* [ r0 save (32-bit) ] |
- * dummy frame for unwind [ back chain 1 ] --
+ /* dummy frame for unwind [ back chain 1 ] --
* [ padding ] align stack frame
* r4_off [ r4 (tailcallcnt) ] optional - 32-bit powerpc
* alt_lr_off [ real lr (ool stub)] optional - actual lr
@@ -833,7 +833,12 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *rw_im
EMIT(PPC_RAW_STL(_R26, _R1, nvr_off + SZL));
if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
- PPC_LI_ADDR(_R3, (unsigned long)im);
+ /*
+ * Emit maximum possible instructions while getting the size of
+ * bpf trampoline to ensure trampoline JIT code doesn't overflow.
+ */
+ PPC_LI_ADDR(_R3, im ? (unsigned long)im :
+ (unsigned long)(~(1UL << (BITS_PER_LONG - 1))));
ret = bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(image, ro_image, ctx,
(unsigned long)__bpf_tramp_enter);
if (ret)
@@ -889,7 +894,8 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *rw_im
bpf_trampoline_restore_tail_call_cnt(image, ctx, func_frame_offset, r4_off);
/* Reserve space to patch branch instruction to skip fexit progs */
- im->ip_after_call = &((u32 *)ro_image)[ctx->idx];
+ if (im)
+ im->ip_after_call = &((u32 *)ro_image)[ctx->idx];
EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
}
@@ -912,8 +918,14 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *rw_im
}
if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
- im->ip_epilogue = &((u32 *)ro_image)[ctx->idx];
- PPC_LI_ADDR(_R3, im);
+ if (im)
+ im->ip_epilogue = &((u32 *)ro_image)[ctx->idx];
+ /*
+ * Emit maximum possible instructions while getting the size of
+ * bpf trampoline to ensure trampoline JIT code doesn't overflow.
+ */
+ PPC_LI_ADDR(_R3, im ? (unsigned long)im :
+ (unsigned long)(~(1UL << (BITS_PER_LONG - 1))));
ret = bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(image, ro_image, ctx,
(unsigned long)__bpf_tramp_exit);
if (ret)
@@ -972,7 +984,6 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *rw_im
int arch_bpf_trampoline_size(const struct btf_func_model *m, u32 flags,
struct bpf_tramp_links *tlinks, void *func_addr)
{
- struct bpf_tramp_image im;
void *image;
int ret;
@@ -988,7 +999,13 @@ int arch_bpf_trampoline_size(const struct btf_func_model *m, u32 flags,
if (!image)
return -ENOMEM;
- ret = __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(&im, image, image + PAGE_SIZE, image,
+ /*
+ * Pass NULL as bpf_tramp_image pointer to differentiate the intent to get the
+ * buffer size for trampoline here. This differentiation helps in accounting for
+ * maximum possible instructions if the JIT code size is likely to vary during
+ * the actual JIT compile of the trampoline.
+ */
+ ret = __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(NULL, image, image + PAGE_SIZE, image,
m, flags, tlinks, func_addr);
bpf_jit_free_exec(image);
--
2.48.1
The source register is not used for SET* and reading it can result in
a UBSAN out-of-bounds array access error, specifically when the MOPS
exception is taken from a SET* sequence with XZR (reg 31) as the
source. Architecturally this is the only case where a src/dst/size
field in the ESR can be reported as 31.
Prior to 2de451a329cf662b the code in do_el0_mops() was benign as the
use of pt_regs_read_reg() prevented the out-of-bounds access.
Fixes: 2de451a329cf662b ("KVM: arm64: Add handler for MOPS exceptions")
Cc: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko(a)arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas(a)arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland(a)arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will(a)kernel.org>
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keirf(a)google.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/traps.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/traps.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/traps.h
index d780d1bd2eac..82cf1f879c61 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/traps.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/traps.h
@@ -109,10 +109,9 @@ static inline void arm64_mops_reset_regs(struct user_pt_regs *regs, unsigned lon
int dstreg = ESR_ELx_MOPS_ISS_DESTREG(esr);
int srcreg = ESR_ELx_MOPS_ISS_SRCREG(esr);
int sizereg = ESR_ELx_MOPS_ISS_SIZEREG(esr);
- unsigned long dst, src, size;
+ unsigned long dst, size;
dst = regs->regs[dstreg];
- src = regs->regs[srcreg];
size = regs->regs[sizereg];
/*
@@ -129,6 +128,7 @@ static inline void arm64_mops_reset_regs(struct user_pt_regs *regs, unsigned lon
}
} else {
/* CPY* instruction */
+ unsigned long src = regs->regs[srcreg];
if (!(option_a ^ wrong_option)) {
/* Format is from Option B */
if (regs->pstate & PSR_N_BIT) {
--
2.49.0.395.g12beb8f557-goog
ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN is 1 by default, but some LoongArch-specific devices
(such as APBDMA) require 16 bytes alignment. When the data buffer length
is too small, the hardware may make an error writing cacheline. Thus, it
is dangerous to allocate a small memory buffer for DMA. It's always safe
to define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN as L1_CACHE_BYTES but unnecessary (kmalloc()
need small memory objects). Therefore, just increase it to 16.
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Tested-by: Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin(a)loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai(a)loongson.cn>
---
arch/loongarch/include/asm/cache.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/cache.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/cache.h
index 1b6d09617199..aa622c754414 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/cache.h
+++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/cache.h
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
#define L1_CACHE_SHIFT CONFIG_L1_CACHE_SHIFT
#define L1_CACHE_BYTES (1 << L1_CACHE_SHIFT)
+#define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN (16)
+
#define __read_mostly __section(".data..read_mostly")
#endif /* _ASM_CACHE_H */
--
2.47.1