March 2025 - Linux-stable-mirror

[PATCH 6/8] crypto: qat - add shutdown handler to qat_c62x

by Giovanni Cabiddu

During a warm reset via kexec, the system bypasses the driver removal sequence, meaning that the remove() callback is not invoked. If a QAT device is not shutdown properly, the device driver will fail to load in a newly rebooted kernel. This might result in output like the following after the kexec reboot: QAT: AE0 is inactive!! QAT: failed to get device out of reset c6xx 0000:3f:00.0: qat_hal_clr_reset error c6xx 0000:3f:00.0: Failed to init the AEs c6xx 0000:3f:00.0: Failed to initialise Acceleration Engine c6xx 0000:3f:00.0: Resetting device qat_dev0 c6xx 0000:3f:00.0: probe with driver c6xx failed with error -14 Implement the shutdown() handler that hooks into the reboot notifier list. This brings down the QAT device and ensures it is shut down properly. Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Fixes: a6dabee6c8ba ("crypto: qat - add support for c62x accel type") Reviewed-by: Ahsan Atta <ahsan.atta(a)intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko(a)linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu(a)intel.com> --- drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_c62x/adf_drv.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_c62x/adf_drv.c b/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_c62x/adf_drv.c index 0bac717e88d9..23ccb72b6ea2 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_c62x/adf_drv.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_c62x/adf_drv.c @@ -209,6 +209,13 @@ static void adf_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) kfree(accel_dev); } +static void adf_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev) +{ + struct adf_accel_dev *accel_dev = adf_devmgr_pci_to_accel_dev(pdev); + + adf_dev_down(accel_dev); +} + static const struct pci_device_id adf_pci_tbl[] = { { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_QAT_C62X) }, { } @@ -220,6 +227,7 @@ static struct pci_driver adf_driver = { .name = ADF_C62X_DEVICE_NAME, .probe = adf_probe, .remove = adf_remove, + .shutdown = adf_shutdown, .sriov_configure = adf_sriov_configure, .err_handler = &adf_err_handler, }; -- 2.48.1

2 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

[PATCH 4/8] crypto: qat - add shutdown handler to qat_dh895xcc

by Giovanni Cabiddu

During a warm reset via kexec, the system bypasses the driver removal sequence, meaning that the remove() callback is not invoked. If a QAT device is not shutdown properly, the device driver will fail to load in a newly rebooted kernel. This might result in output like the following after the kexec reboot: QAT: AE0 is inactive!! QAT: failed to get device out of reset dh895xcc 0000:3f:00.0: qat_hal_clr_reset error dh895xcc 0000:3f:00.0: Failed to init the AEs dh895xcc 0000:3f:00.0: Failed to initialise Acceleration Engine dh895xcc 0000:3f:00.0: Resetting device qat_dev0 dh895xcc 0000:3f:00.0: probe with driver dh895xcc failed with error -14 Implement the shutdown() handler that hooks into the reboot notifier list. This brings down the QAT device and ensures it is shut down properly. Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Fixes: 7afa232e76ce ("crypto: qat - Intel(R) QAT DH895xcc accelerator") Reviewed-by: Ahsan Atta <ahsan.atta(a)intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko(a)linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu(a)intel.com> --- drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_dh895xcc/adf_drv.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_dh895xcc/adf_drv.c b/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_dh895xcc/adf_drv.c index 730147404ceb..b59e0cc49e52 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_dh895xcc/adf_drv.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_dh895xcc/adf_drv.c @@ -209,6 +209,13 @@ static void adf_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) kfree(accel_dev); } +static void adf_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev) +{ + struct adf_accel_dev *accel_dev = adf_devmgr_pci_to_accel_dev(pdev); + + adf_dev_down(accel_dev); +} + static const struct pci_device_id adf_pci_tbl[] = { { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_QAT_DH895XCC) }, { } @@ -220,6 +227,7 @@ static struct pci_driver adf_driver = { .name = ADF_DH895XCC_DEVICE_NAME, .probe = adf_probe, .remove = adf_remove, + .shutdown = adf_shutdown, .sriov_configure = adf_sriov_configure, .err_handler = &adf_err_handler, }; -- 2.48.1

2 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

[PATCH 2/8] crypto: qat - add shutdown handler to qat_420xx

by Giovanni Cabiddu

During a warm reset via kexec, the system bypasses the driver removal sequence, meaning that the remove() callback is not invoked. If a QAT device is not shutdown properly, the device driver will fail to load in a newly rebooted kernel. This might result in output like the following after the kexec reboot: 420xx 0000:01:00.0: Failed to power up the device 420xx 0000:01:00.0: Failed to initialize device 420xx 0000:01:00.0: Resetting device qat_dev0 420xx 0000:01:00.0: probe with driver 420xx failed with error -14 Implement the shutdown() handler that hooks into the reboot notifier list. This brings down the QAT device and ensures it is shut down properly. Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Fixes: fcf60f4bcf54 ("crypto: qat - add support for 420xx devices") Reviewed-by: Ahsan Atta <ahsan.atta(a)intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko(a)linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu(a)intel.com> --- drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_420xx/adf_drv.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_420xx/adf_drv.c b/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_420xx/adf_drv.c index 8084aa0f7f41..b4731f02deb8 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_420xx/adf_drv.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_420xx/adf_drv.c @@ -186,11 +186,19 @@ static void adf_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) adf_cleanup_accel(accel_dev); } +static void adf_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev) +{ + struct adf_accel_dev *accel_dev = adf_devmgr_pci_to_accel_dev(pdev); + + adf_dev_down(accel_dev); +} + static struct pci_driver adf_driver = { .id_table = adf_pci_tbl, .name = ADF_420XX_DEVICE_NAME, .probe = adf_probe, .remove = adf_remove, + .shutdown = adf_shutdown, .sriov_configure = adf_sriov_configure, .err_handler = &adf_err_handler, }; -- 2.48.1

2 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

[PATCH 1/8] crypto: qat - add shutdown handler to qat_4xxx

by Giovanni Cabiddu

During a warm reset via kexec, the system bypasses the driver removal sequence, meaning that the remove() callback is not invoked. If a QAT device is not shutdown properly, the device driver will fail to load in a newly rebooted kernel. This might result in output like the following after the kexec reboot: 4xxx 0000:01:00.0: Failed to power up the device 4xxx 0000:01:00.0: Failed to initialize device 4xxx 0000:01:00.0: Resetting device qat_dev0 4xxx 0000:01:00.0: probe with driver 4xxx failed with error -14 Implement the shutdown() handler that hooks into the reboot notifier list. This brings down the QAT device and ensures it is shut down properly. Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Fixes: 8c8268166e83 ("crypto: qat - add qat_4xxx driver") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Z-DGQrhRj9niR9iZ@gondor.apana.org.au/ Reported-by: Randy Wright <rwright(a)hpe.com> Closes: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-84366 Reviewed-by: Ahsan Atta <ahsan.atta(a)intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko(a)linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu(a)intel.com> --- drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_4xxx/adf_drv.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_4xxx/adf_drv.c b/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_4xxx/adf_drv.c index 5537a9991e4e..1ac415ef3c31 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_4xxx/adf_drv.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_4xxx/adf_drv.c @@ -188,11 +188,19 @@ static void adf_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) adf_cleanup_accel(accel_dev); } +static void adf_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev) +{ + struct adf_accel_dev *accel_dev = adf_devmgr_pci_to_accel_dev(pdev); + + adf_dev_down(accel_dev); +} + static struct pci_driver adf_driver = { .id_table = adf_pci_tbl, .name = ADF_4XXX_DEVICE_NAME, .probe = adf_probe, .remove = adf_remove, + .shutdown = adf_shutdown, .sriov_configure = adf_sriov_configure, .err_handler = &adf_err_handler, }; -- 2.48.1

2 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

[PATCH stable 5.15 v2 0/2] openvswitch port output fixes

by Florian Fainelli

This patch series contains some missing openvswitch port output fixes for the stable 5.15 kernel. Changes in v2: - use BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID rather than DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE which does not exist in Linux 5.15 Felix Huettner (1): net: openvswitch: fix race on port output Ilya Maximets (1): openvswitch: fix lockup on tx to unregistering netdev with carrier net/core/dev.c | 1 + net/openvswitch/actions.c | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.34.1

2 months, 3 weeks

3
6
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add missing PCIe supplies to RockPro64" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x ffcef3df680c437ca33ff434be18ec24d72907c2 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025032631-manly-divinity-6cce@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From ffcef3df680c437ca33ff434be18ec24d72907c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dragan Simic <dsimic(a)manjaro.org> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 19:48:04 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add missing PCIe supplies to RockPro64 board dtsi Add missing "vpcie0v9-supply" and "vpcie1v8-supply" properties to the "pcie0" node in the Pine64 RockPro64 board dtsi file. This eliminates the following warnings from the kernel log: rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie1v8 not found, using dummy regulator rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie0v9 not found, using dummy regulator These additions improve the accuracy of hardware description of the RockPro64 and, in theory, they should result in no functional changes to the way board works after the changes, because the "vcca_0v9" and "vcca_1v8" regulators are always enabled. [1][2] However, extended reliability testing, performed by Chris, [3] has proven that the age-old issues with some PCI Express cards, when used with a Pine64 RockPro64, are also resolved. Those issues were already mentioned in the commit 43853e843aa6 (arm64: dts: rockchip: Remove unsupported node from the Pinebook Pro dts, 2024-04-01), together with a brief description of the out-of-tree enumeration delay patch that reportedly resolves those issues. In a nutshell, booting a RockPro64 with some PCI Express cards attached to it caused a kernel oops. [4] Symptomatically enough, to the commit author's best knowledge, only the Pine64 RockPro64, out of all RK3399-based boards and devices supported upstream, has been reported to suffer from those PCI Express issues, and only the RockPro64 had some of the PCI Express supplies missing in its DT. Thus, perhaps some weird timing issues exist that caused the "vcca_1v8" always-on regulator, which is part of the RK808 PMIC, to actually not be enabled before the PCI Express is initialized and enumerated on the RockPro64, causing oopses with some PCIe cards, and the aforementioned enumeration delay patch [4] probably acted as just a workaround for the underlying timing issue. Admittedly, the Pine64 RockPro64 is a bit specific board by having a standard PCI Express slot, allowing use of various standard cards, but pretty much standard PCI Express cards have been attached to other RK3399 boards as well, and the commit author is unaware ot such issues reported for them. It's quite hard to be sure that the PCI Express issues are fully resolved by these additions to the DT, without some really extensive and time-consuming testing. However, these additions to the DT can result in good things and improvements anyway, making them perfectly safe from the standpoint of being unable to do any harm or cause some unforeseen regressions. These changes apply to the both supported hardware revisions of the Pine64 RockPro64, i.e. to the production-run revisions 2.0 and 2.1. [1][2] [1] https://files.pine64.org/doc/rockpro64/rockpro64_v21-SCH.pdf [2] https://files.pine64.org/doc/rockpro64/rockpro64_v20-SCH.pdf [3] https://z9.de/hedgedoc/s/nF4d5G7rg#reboot-tests-for-PCIe-improvements [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230509153912.515218-1-vincenzopalazzodev@gma… Fixes: bba821f5479e ("arm64: dts: rockchip: add PCIe nodes on rk3399-rockpro64") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev(a)gmail.com> Cc: Peter Geis <pgwipeout(a)gmail.com> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas(a)kernel.org> Reported-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian(a)cknow.org> Tested-by: Chris Vogel <chris(a)z9.de> Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic(a)manjaro.org> Tested-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian(a)cknow.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b39cfd7490d8194f053bf3971f13a43472d1769e.17409410… Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko(a)sntech.de> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi index 47dc198706c8..51c6aa26d828 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi @@ -673,6 +673,8 @@ &pcie0 { num-lanes = <4>; pinctrl-names = "default"; pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_perst>; + vpcie0v9-supply = <&vcca_0v9>; + vpcie1v8-supply = <&vcca_1v8>; vpcie12v-supply = <&vcc12v_dcin>; vpcie3v3-supply = <&vcc3v3_pcie>; status = "okay";

2 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add missing PCIe supplies to RockPro64" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x ffcef3df680c437ca33ff434be18ec24d72907c2 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025032630-hungrily-sensuous-e053@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From ffcef3df680c437ca33ff434be18ec24d72907c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dragan Simic <dsimic(a)manjaro.org> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 19:48:04 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add missing PCIe supplies to RockPro64 board dtsi Add missing "vpcie0v9-supply" and "vpcie1v8-supply" properties to the "pcie0" node in the Pine64 RockPro64 board dtsi file. This eliminates the following warnings from the kernel log: rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie1v8 not found, using dummy regulator rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie0v9 not found, using dummy regulator These additions improve the accuracy of hardware description of the RockPro64 and, in theory, they should result in no functional changes to the way board works after the changes, because the "vcca_0v9" and "vcca_1v8" regulators are always enabled. [1][2] However, extended reliability testing, performed by Chris, [3] has proven that the age-old issues with some PCI Express cards, when used with a Pine64 RockPro64, are also resolved. Those issues were already mentioned in the commit 43853e843aa6 (arm64: dts: rockchip: Remove unsupported node from the Pinebook Pro dts, 2024-04-01), together with a brief description of the out-of-tree enumeration delay patch that reportedly resolves those issues. In a nutshell, booting a RockPro64 with some PCI Express cards attached to it caused a kernel oops. [4] Symptomatically enough, to the commit author's best knowledge, only the Pine64 RockPro64, out of all RK3399-based boards and devices supported upstream, has been reported to suffer from those PCI Express issues, and only the RockPro64 had some of the PCI Express supplies missing in its DT. Thus, perhaps some weird timing issues exist that caused the "vcca_1v8" always-on regulator, which is part of the RK808 PMIC, to actually not be enabled before the PCI Express is initialized and enumerated on the RockPro64, causing oopses with some PCIe cards, and the aforementioned enumeration delay patch [4] probably acted as just a workaround for the underlying timing issue. Admittedly, the Pine64 RockPro64 is a bit specific board by having a standard PCI Express slot, allowing use of various standard cards, but pretty much standard PCI Express cards have been attached to other RK3399 boards as well, and the commit author is unaware ot such issues reported for them. It's quite hard to be sure that the PCI Express issues are fully resolved by these additions to the DT, without some really extensive and time-consuming testing. However, these additions to the DT can result in good things and improvements anyway, making them perfectly safe from the standpoint of being unable to do any harm or cause some unforeseen regressions. These changes apply to the both supported hardware revisions of the Pine64 RockPro64, i.e. to the production-run revisions 2.0 and 2.1. [1][2] [1] https://files.pine64.org/doc/rockpro64/rockpro64_v21-SCH.pdf [2] https://files.pine64.org/doc/rockpro64/rockpro64_v20-SCH.pdf [3] https://z9.de/hedgedoc/s/nF4d5G7rg#reboot-tests-for-PCIe-improvements [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230509153912.515218-1-vincenzopalazzodev@gma… Fixes: bba821f5479e ("arm64: dts: rockchip: add PCIe nodes on rk3399-rockpro64") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev(a)gmail.com> Cc: Peter Geis <pgwipeout(a)gmail.com> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas(a)kernel.org> Reported-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian(a)cknow.org> Tested-by: Chris Vogel <chris(a)z9.de> Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic(a)manjaro.org> Tested-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian(a)cknow.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b39cfd7490d8194f053bf3971f13a43472d1769e.17409410… Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko(a)sntech.de> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi index 47dc198706c8..51c6aa26d828 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi @@ -673,6 +673,8 @@ &pcie0 { num-lanes = <4>; pinctrl-names = "default"; pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_perst>; + vpcie0v9-supply = <&vcca_0v9>; + vpcie1v8-supply = <&vcca_1v8>; vpcie12v-supply = <&vcc12v_dcin>; vpcie3v3-supply = <&vcc3v3_pcie>; status = "okay";

2 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add missing PCIe supplies to RockPro64" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x ffcef3df680c437ca33ff434be18ec24d72907c2 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025032629-election-startle-0fcc@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From ffcef3df680c437ca33ff434be18ec24d72907c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dragan Simic <dsimic(a)manjaro.org> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 19:48:04 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add missing PCIe supplies to RockPro64 board dtsi Add missing "vpcie0v9-supply" and "vpcie1v8-supply" properties to the "pcie0" node in the Pine64 RockPro64 board dtsi file. This eliminates the following warnings from the kernel log: rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie1v8 not found, using dummy regulator rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie0v9 not found, using dummy regulator These additions improve the accuracy of hardware description of the RockPro64 and, in theory, they should result in no functional changes to the way board works after the changes, because the "vcca_0v9" and "vcca_1v8" regulators are always enabled. [1][2] However, extended reliability testing, performed by Chris, [3] has proven that the age-old issues with some PCI Express cards, when used with a Pine64 RockPro64, are also resolved. Those issues were already mentioned in the commit 43853e843aa6 (arm64: dts: rockchip: Remove unsupported node from the Pinebook Pro dts, 2024-04-01), together with a brief description of the out-of-tree enumeration delay patch that reportedly resolves those issues. In a nutshell, booting a RockPro64 with some PCI Express cards attached to it caused a kernel oops. [4] Symptomatically enough, to the commit author's best knowledge, only the Pine64 RockPro64, out of all RK3399-based boards and devices supported upstream, has been reported to suffer from those PCI Express issues, and only the RockPro64 had some of the PCI Express supplies missing in its DT. Thus, perhaps some weird timing issues exist that caused the "vcca_1v8" always-on regulator, which is part of the RK808 PMIC, to actually not be enabled before the PCI Express is initialized and enumerated on the RockPro64, causing oopses with some PCIe cards, and the aforementioned enumeration delay patch [4] probably acted as just a workaround for the underlying timing issue. Admittedly, the Pine64 RockPro64 is a bit specific board by having a standard PCI Express slot, allowing use of various standard cards, but pretty much standard PCI Express cards have been attached to other RK3399 boards as well, and the commit author is unaware ot such issues reported for them. It's quite hard to be sure that the PCI Express issues are fully resolved by these additions to the DT, without some really extensive and time-consuming testing. However, these additions to the DT can result in good things and improvements anyway, making them perfectly safe from the standpoint of being unable to do any harm or cause some unforeseen regressions. These changes apply to the both supported hardware revisions of the Pine64 RockPro64, i.e. to the production-run revisions 2.0 and 2.1. [1][2] [1] https://files.pine64.org/doc/rockpro64/rockpro64_v21-SCH.pdf [2] https://files.pine64.org/doc/rockpro64/rockpro64_v20-SCH.pdf [3] https://z9.de/hedgedoc/s/nF4d5G7rg#reboot-tests-for-PCIe-improvements [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230509153912.515218-1-vincenzopalazzodev@gma… Fixes: bba821f5479e ("arm64: dts: rockchip: add PCIe nodes on rk3399-rockpro64") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev(a)gmail.com> Cc: Peter Geis <pgwipeout(a)gmail.com> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas(a)kernel.org> Reported-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian(a)cknow.org> Tested-by: Chris Vogel <chris(a)z9.de> Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic(a)manjaro.org> Tested-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian(a)cknow.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b39cfd7490d8194f053bf3971f13a43472d1769e.17409410… Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko(a)sntech.de> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi index 47dc198706c8..51c6aa26d828 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi @@ -673,6 +673,8 @@ &pcie0 { num-lanes = <4>; pinctrl-names = "default"; pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_perst>; + vpcie0v9-supply = <&vcca_0v9>; + vpcie1v8-supply = <&vcca_1v8>; vpcie12v-supply = <&vcc12v_dcin>; vpcie3v3-supply = <&vcc3v3_pcie>; status = "okay";

2 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add missing PCIe supplies to RockPro64" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x ffcef3df680c437ca33ff434be18ec24d72907c2 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025032627-unlit-moaning-6815@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From ffcef3df680c437ca33ff434be18ec24d72907c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dragan Simic <dsimic(a)manjaro.org> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 19:48:04 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add missing PCIe supplies to RockPro64 board dtsi Add missing "vpcie0v9-supply" and "vpcie1v8-supply" properties to the "pcie0" node in the Pine64 RockPro64 board dtsi file. This eliminates the following warnings from the kernel log: rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie1v8 not found, using dummy regulator rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie0v9 not found, using dummy regulator These additions improve the accuracy of hardware description of the RockPro64 and, in theory, they should result in no functional changes to the way board works after the changes, because the "vcca_0v9" and "vcca_1v8" regulators are always enabled. [1][2] However, extended reliability testing, performed by Chris, [3] has proven that the age-old issues with some PCI Express cards, when used with a Pine64 RockPro64, are also resolved. Those issues were already mentioned in the commit 43853e843aa6 (arm64: dts: rockchip: Remove unsupported node from the Pinebook Pro dts, 2024-04-01), together with a brief description of the out-of-tree enumeration delay patch that reportedly resolves those issues. In a nutshell, booting a RockPro64 with some PCI Express cards attached to it caused a kernel oops. [4] Symptomatically enough, to the commit author's best knowledge, only the Pine64 RockPro64, out of all RK3399-based boards and devices supported upstream, has been reported to suffer from those PCI Express issues, and only the RockPro64 had some of the PCI Express supplies missing in its DT. Thus, perhaps some weird timing issues exist that caused the "vcca_1v8" always-on regulator, which is part of the RK808 PMIC, to actually not be enabled before the PCI Express is initialized and enumerated on the RockPro64, causing oopses with some PCIe cards, and the aforementioned enumeration delay patch [4] probably acted as just a workaround for the underlying timing issue. Admittedly, the Pine64 RockPro64 is a bit specific board by having a standard PCI Express slot, allowing use of various standard cards, but pretty much standard PCI Express cards have been attached to other RK3399 boards as well, and the commit author is unaware ot such issues reported for them. It's quite hard to be sure that the PCI Express issues are fully resolved by these additions to the DT, without some really extensive and time-consuming testing. However, these additions to the DT can result in good things and improvements anyway, making them perfectly safe from the standpoint of being unable to do any harm or cause some unforeseen regressions. These changes apply to the both supported hardware revisions of the Pine64 RockPro64, i.e. to the production-run revisions 2.0 and 2.1. [1][2] [1] https://files.pine64.org/doc/rockpro64/rockpro64_v21-SCH.pdf [2] https://files.pine64.org/doc/rockpro64/rockpro64_v20-SCH.pdf [3] https://z9.de/hedgedoc/s/nF4d5G7rg#reboot-tests-for-PCIe-improvements [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230509153912.515218-1-vincenzopalazzodev@gma… Fixes: bba821f5479e ("arm64: dts: rockchip: add PCIe nodes on rk3399-rockpro64") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev(a)gmail.com> Cc: Peter Geis <pgwipeout(a)gmail.com> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas(a)kernel.org> Reported-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian(a)cknow.org> Tested-by: Chris Vogel <chris(a)z9.de> Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic(a)manjaro.org> Tested-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian(a)cknow.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b39cfd7490d8194f053bf3971f13a43472d1769e.17409410… Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko(a)sntech.de> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi index 47dc198706c8..51c6aa26d828 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi @@ -673,6 +673,8 @@ &pcie0 { num-lanes = <4>; pinctrl-names = "default"; pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_perst>; + vpcie0v9-supply = <&vcca_0v9>; + vpcie1v8-supply = <&vcca_1v8>; vpcie12v-supply = <&vcc12v_dcin>; vpcie3v3-supply = <&vcc3v3_pcie>; status = "okay";

2 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add missing PCIe supplies to RockPro64" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x ffcef3df680c437ca33ff434be18ec24d72907c2 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025032628-fiction-upcoming-5d09@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From ffcef3df680c437ca33ff434be18ec24d72907c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dragan Simic <dsimic(a)manjaro.org> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 19:48:04 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add missing PCIe supplies to RockPro64 board dtsi Add missing "vpcie0v9-supply" and "vpcie1v8-supply" properties to the "pcie0" node in the Pine64 RockPro64 board dtsi file. This eliminates the following warnings from the kernel log: rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie1v8 not found, using dummy regulator rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie0v9 not found, using dummy regulator These additions improve the accuracy of hardware description of the RockPro64 and, in theory, they should result in no functional changes to the way board works after the changes, because the "vcca_0v9" and "vcca_1v8" regulators are always enabled. [1][2] However, extended reliability testing, performed by Chris, [3] has proven that the age-old issues with some PCI Express cards, when used with a Pine64 RockPro64, are also resolved. Those issues were already mentioned in the commit 43853e843aa6 (arm64: dts: rockchip: Remove unsupported node from the Pinebook Pro dts, 2024-04-01), together with a brief description of the out-of-tree enumeration delay patch that reportedly resolves those issues. In a nutshell, booting a RockPro64 with some PCI Express cards attached to it caused a kernel oops. [4] Symptomatically enough, to the commit author's best knowledge, only the Pine64 RockPro64, out of all RK3399-based boards and devices supported upstream, has been reported to suffer from those PCI Express issues, and only the RockPro64 had some of the PCI Express supplies missing in its DT. Thus, perhaps some weird timing issues exist that caused the "vcca_1v8" always-on regulator, which is part of the RK808 PMIC, to actually not be enabled before the PCI Express is initialized and enumerated on the RockPro64, causing oopses with some PCIe cards, and the aforementioned enumeration delay patch [4] probably acted as just a workaround for the underlying timing issue. Admittedly, the Pine64 RockPro64 is a bit specific board by having a standard PCI Express slot, allowing use of various standard cards, but pretty much standard PCI Express cards have been attached to other RK3399 boards as well, and the commit author is unaware ot such issues reported for them. It's quite hard to be sure that the PCI Express issues are fully resolved by these additions to the DT, without some really extensive and time-consuming testing. However, these additions to the DT can result in good things and improvements anyway, making them perfectly safe from the standpoint of being unable to do any harm or cause some unforeseen regressions. These changes apply to the both supported hardware revisions of the Pine64 RockPro64, i.e. to the production-run revisions 2.0 and 2.1. [1][2] [1] https://files.pine64.org/doc/rockpro64/rockpro64_v21-SCH.pdf [2] https://files.pine64.org/doc/rockpro64/rockpro64_v20-SCH.pdf [3] https://z9.de/hedgedoc/s/nF4d5G7rg#reboot-tests-for-PCIe-improvements [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230509153912.515218-1-vincenzopalazzodev@gma… Fixes: bba821f5479e ("arm64: dts: rockchip: add PCIe nodes on rk3399-rockpro64") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev(a)gmail.com> Cc: Peter Geis <pgwipeout(a)gmail.com> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas(a)kernel.org> Reported-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian(a)cknow.org> Tested-by: Chris Vogel <chris(a)z9.de> Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic(a)manjaro.org> Tested-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian(a)cknow.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b39cfd7490d8194f053bf3971f13a43472d1769e.17409410… Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko(a)sntech.de> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi index 47dc198706c8..51c6aa26d828 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi @@ -673,6 +673,8 @@ &pcie0 { num-lanes = <4>; pinctrl-names = "default"; pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_perst>; + vpcie0v9-supply = <&vcca_0v9>; + vpcie1v8-supply = <&vcca_1v8>; vpcie12v-supply = <&vcc12v_dcin>; vpcie3v3-supply = <&vcc3v3_pcie>; status = "okay";

2 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror March 2025