November 2024 - Linux-stable-mirror

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x f8f931bba0f92052cf842b7e30917b1afcc77d5a # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024111131-haziness-slum-8f5e@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From f8f931bba0f92052cf842b7e30917b1afcc77d5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 13:02:13 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking Recent changes are putting more pressure on THP deferred split queues: under load revealing long-standing races, causing list_del corruptions, "Bad page state"s and worse (I keep BUGs in both of those, so usually don't get to see how badly they end up without). The relevant recent changes being 6.8's mTHP, 6.10's mTHP swapout, and 6.12's mTHP swapin, improved swap allocation, and underused THP splitting. Before fixing locking: rename misleading folio_undo_large_rmappable(), which does not undo large_rmappable, to folio_unqueue_deferred_split(), which is what it does. But that and its out-of-line __callee are mm internals of very limited usability: add comment and WARN_ON_ONCEs to check usage; and return a bool to say if a deferred split was unqueued, which can then be used in WARN_ON_ONCEs around safety checks (sparing callers the arcane conditionals in __folio_unqueue_deferred_split()). Just omit the folio_unqueue_deferred_split() from free_unref_folios(), all of whose callers now call it beforehand (and if any forget then bad_page() will tell) - except for its caller put_pages_list(), which itself no longer has any callers (and will be deleted separately). Swapout: mem_cgroup_swapout() has been resetting folio->memcg_data 0 without checking and unqueueing a THP folio from deferred split list; which is unfortunate, since the split_queue_lock depends on the memcg (when memcg is enabled); so swapout has been unqueueing such THPs later, when freeing the folio, using the pgdat's lock instead: potentially corrupting the memcg's list. __remove_mapping() has frozen refcount to 0 here, so no problem with calling folio_unqueue_deferred_split() before resetting memcg_data. That goes back to 5.4 commit 87eaceb3faa5 ("mm: thp: make deferred split shrinker memcg aware"): which included a check on swapcache before adding to deferred queue, but no check on deferred queue before adding THP to swapcache. That worked fine with the usual sequence of events in reclaim (though there were a couple of rare ways in which a THP on deferred queue could have been swapped out), but 6.12 commit dafff3f4c850 ("mm: split underused THPs") avoids splitting underused THPs in reclaim, which makes swapcache THPs on deferred queue commonplace. Keep the check on swapcache before adding to deferred queue? Yes: it is no longer essential, but preserves the existing behaviour, and is likely to be a worthwhile optimization (vmstat showed much more traffic on the queue under swapping load if the check was removed); update its comment. Memcg-v1 move (deprecated): mem_cgroup_move_account() has been changing folio->memcg_data without checking and unqueueing a THP folio from the deferred list, sometimes corrupting "from" memcg's list, like swapout. Refcount is non-zero here, so folio_unqueue_deferred_split() can only be used in a WARN_ON_ONCE to validate the fix, which must be done earlier: mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range() first try to split the THP (splitting of course unqueues), or skip it if that fails. Not ideal, but moving charge has been requested, and khugepaged should repair the THP later: nobody wants new custom unqueueing code just for this deprecated case. The 87eaceb3faa5 commit did have the code to move from one deferred list to another (but was not conscious of its unsafety while refcount non-0); but that was removed by 5.6 commit fac0516b5534 ("mm: thp: don't need care deferred split queue in memcg charge move path"), which argued that the existence of a PMD mapping guarantees that the THP cannot be on a deferred list. As above, false in rare cases, and now commonly false. Backport to 6.11 should be straightforward. Earlier backports must take care that other _deferred_list fixes and dependencies are included. There is not a strong case for backports, but they can fix cornercases. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8dc111ae-f6db-2da7-b25c-7a20b1effe3b@google.com Fixes: 87eaceb3faa5 ("mm: thp: make deferred split shrinker memcg aware") Fixes: dafff3f4c850 ("mm: split underused THPs") Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301(a)gmail.com> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang(a)linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Barry Song <baohua(a)kernel.org> Cc: Chris Li <chrisl(a)kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes(a)cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang(a)huawei.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: Nhat Pham <nphamcs(a)gmail.com> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt(a)linux.dev> Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642(a)gmail.com> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang(a)gmail.com> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy(a)nvidia.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c index a1d345f1680c..03fd4bc39ea1 100644 --- a/mm/huge_memory.c +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -3588,10 +3588,27 @@ int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list) return split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(&folio->page, list, ret); } -void __folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio) +/* + * __folio_unqueue_deferred_split() is not to be called directly: + * the folio_unqueue_deferred_split() inline wrapper in mm/internal.h + * limits its calls to those folios which may have a _deferred_list for + * queueing THP splits, and that list is (racily observed to be) non-empty. + * + * It is unsafe to call folio_unqueue_deferred_split() until folio refcount is + * zero: because even when split_queue_lock is held, a non-empty _deferred_list + * might be in use on deferred_split_scan()'s unlocked on-stack list. + * + * If memory cgroups are enabled, split_queue_lock is in the mem_cgroup: it is + * therefore important to unqueue deferred split before changing folio memcg. + */ +bool __folio_unqueue_deferred_split(struct folio *folio) { struct deferred_split *ds_queue; unsigned long flags; + bool unqueued = false; + + WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_ref_count(folio)); + WARN_ON_ONCE(!mem_cgroup_disabled() && !folio_memcg(folio)); ds_queue = get_deferred_split_queue(folio); spin_lock_irqsave(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags); @@ -3603,8 +3620,11 @@ void __folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio) MTHP_STAT_NR_ANON_PARTIALLY_MAPPED, -1); } list_del_init(&folio->_deferred_list); + unqueued = true; } spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags); + + return unqueued; /* useful for debug warnings */ } /* partially_mapped=false won't clear PG_partially_mapped folio flag */ @@ -3627,14 +3647,11 @@ void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio, bool partially_mapped) return; /* - * The try_to_unmap() in page reclaim path might reach here too, - * this may cause a race condition to corrupt deferred split queue. - * And, if page reclaim is already handling the same folio, it is - * unnecessary to handle it again in shrinker. - * - * Check the swapcache flag to determine if the folio is being - * handled by page reclaim since THP swap would add the folio into - * swap cache before calling try_to_unmap(). + * Exclude swapcache: originally to avoid a corrupt deferred split + * queue. Nowadays that is fully prevented by mem_cgroup_swapout(); + * but if page reclaim is already handling the same folio, it is + * unnecessary to handle it again in the shrinker, so excluding + * swapcache here may still be a useful optimization. */ if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) return; diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h index 93083bbeeefa..16c1f3cd599e 100644 --- a/mm/internal.h +++ b/mm/internal.h @@ -639,11 +639,11 @@ static inline void folio_set_order(struct folio *folio, unsigned int order) #endif } -void __folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio); -static inline void folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio) +bool __folio_unqueue_deferred_split(struct folio *folio); +static inline bool folio_unqueue_deferred_split(struct folio *folio) { if (folio_order(folio) <= 1 || !folio_test_large_rmappable(folio)) - return; + return false; /* * At this point, there is no one trying to add the folio to @@ -651,9 +651,9 @@ static inline void folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio) * to check without acquiring the split_queue_lock. */ if (data_race(list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list))) - return; + return false; - __folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + return __folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); } static inline struct folio *page_rmappable_folio(struct page *page) diff --git a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c index 81d8819f13cd..f8744f5630bb 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c @@ -848,6 +848,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct folio *folio, css_get(&to->css); css_put(&from->css); + /* Warning should never happen, so don't worry about refcount non-0 */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio)); folio->memcg_data = (unsigned long)to; __folio_memcg_unlock(from); @@ -1217,7 +1219,9 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, enum mc_target_type target_type; union mc_target target; struct folio *folio; + bool tried_split_before = false; +retry_pmd: ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma); if (ptl) { if (mc.precharge < HPAGE_PMD_NR) { @@ -1227,6 +1231,27 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, target_type = get_mctgt_type_thp(vma, addr, *pmd, &target); if (target_type == MC_TARGET_PAGE) { folio = target.folio; + /* + * Deferred split queue locking depends on memcg, + * and unqueue is unsafe unless folio refcount is 0: + * split or skip if on the queue? first try to split. + */ + if (!list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) { + spin_unlock(ptl); + if (!tried_split_before) + split_folio(folio); + folio_unlock(folio); + folio_put(folio); + if (tried_split_before) + return 0; + tried_split_before = true; + goto retry_pmd; + } + /* + * So long as that pmd lock is held, the folio cannot + * be racily added to the _deferred_list, because + * __folio_remove_rmap() will find !partially_mapped. + */ if (folio_isolate_lru(folio)) { if (!mem_cgroup_move_account(folio, true, mc.from, mc.to)) { diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 2703227cce88..06df2af97415 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -4629,9 +4629,6 @@ static void uncharge_folio(struct folio *folio, struct uncharge_gather *ug) struct obj_cgroup *objcg; VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_lru(folio), folio); - VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_order(folio) > 1 && - !folio_test_hugetlb(folio) && - !list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list), folio); /* * Nobody should be changing or seriously looking at @@ -4678,6 +4675,7 @@ static void uncharge_folio(struct folio *folio, struct uncharge_gather *ug) ug->nr_memory += nr_pages; ug->pgpgout++; + WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio)); folio->memcg_data = 0; } @@ -4789,6 +4787,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_migrate(struct folio *old, struct folio *new) /* Transfer the charge and the css ref */ commit_charge(new, memcg); + + /* Warning should never happen, so don't worry about refcount non-0 */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_unqueue_deferred_split(old)); old->memcg_data = 0; } @@ -4975,6 +4976,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_swapout(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry) VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(oldid, folio); mod_memcg_state(swap_memcg, MEMCG_SWAP, nr_entries); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); folio->memcg_data = 0; if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c index fab84a776088..dfa24e41e8f9 100644 --- a/mm/migrate.c +++ b/mm/migrate.c @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ static int __folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, folio_test_large_rmappable(folio)) { if (!folio_ref_freeze(folio, expected_count)) return -EAGAIN; - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); folio_ref_unfreeze(folio, expected_count); } @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static int __folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, } /* Take off deferred split queue while frozen and memcg set */ - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); /* * Now we know that no one else is looking at the folio: diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 5e108ae755cc..8ad38cd5e574 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -2681,7 +2681,6 @@ void free_unref_folios(struct folio_batch *folios) unsigned long pfn = folio_pfn(folio); unsigned int order = folio_order(folio); - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); if (!free_pages_prepare(&folio->page, order)) continue; /* diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c index 835bdf324b76..b8e3259ea2c4 100644 --- a/mm/swap.c +++ b/mm/swap.c @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ void __folio_put(struct folio *folio) } page_cache_release(folio); - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); mem_cgroup_uncharge(folio); free_unref_page(&folio->page, folio_order(folio)); } @@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ void folios_put_refs(struct folio_batch *folios, unsigned int *refs) free_huge_folio(folio); continue; } - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); __page_cache_release(folio, &lruvec, &flags); if (j != i) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index ddaaff67642e..28ba2b06fc7d 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1476,7 +1476,7 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, */ nr_reclaimed += nr_pages; - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); if (folio_batch_add(&free_folios, folio) == 0) { mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(&free_folios); try_to_unmap_flush(); @@ -1864,7 +1864,7 @@ static unsigned int move_folios_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec, if (unlikely(folio_put_testzero(folio))) { __folio_clear_lru_flags(folio); - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); if (folio_batch_add(&free_folios, folio) == 0) { spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock); mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(&free_folios);

1 month, 4 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x f8f931bba0f92052cf842b7e30917b1afcc77d5a # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024111118-stove-huddling-7076@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From f8f931bba0f92052cf842b7e30917b1afcc77d5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 13:02:13 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking Recent changes are putting more pressure on THP deferred split queues: under load revealing long-standing races, causing list_del corruptions, "Bad page state"s and worse (I keep BUGs in both of those, so usually don't get to see how badly they end up without). The relevant recent changes being 6.8's mTHP, 6.10's mTHP swapout, and 6.12's mTHP swapin, improved swap allocation, and underused THP splitting. Before fixing locking: rename misleading folio_undo_large_rmappable(), which does not undo large_rmappable, to folio_unqueue_deferred_split(), which is what it does. But that and its out-of-line __callee are mm internals of very limited usability: add comment and WARN_ON_ONCEs to check usage; and return a bool to say if a deferred split was unqueued, which can then be used in WARN_ON_ONCEs around safety checks (sparing callers the arcane conditionals in __folio_unqueue_deferred_split()). Just omit the folio_unqueue_deferred_split() from free_unref_folios(), all of whose callers now call it beforehand (and if any forget then bad_page() will tell) - except for its caller put_pages_list(), which itself no longer has any callers (and will be deleted separately). Swapout: mem_cgroup_swapout() has been resetting folio->memcg_data 0 without checking and unqueueing a THP folio from deferred split list; which is unfortunate, since the split_queue_lock depends on the memcg (when memcg is enabled); so swapout has been unqueueing such THPs later, when freeing the folio, using the pgdat's lock instead: potentially corrupting the memcg's list. __remove_mapping() has frozen refcount to 0 here, so no problem with calling folio_unqueue_deferred_split() before resetting memcg_data. That goes back to 5.4 commit 87eaceb3faa5 ("mm: thp: make deferred split shrinker memcg aware"): which included a check on swapcache before adding to deferred queue, but no check on deferred queue before adding THP to swapcache. That worked fine with the usual sequence of events in reclaim (though there were a couple of rare ways in which a THP on deferred queue could have been swapped out), but 6.12 commit dafff3f4c850 ("mm: split underused THPs") avoids splitting underused THPs in reclaim, which makes swapcache THPs on deferred queue commonplace. Keep the check on swapcache before adding to deferred queue? Yes: it is no longer essential, but preserves the existing behaviour, and is likely to be a worthwhile optimization (vmstat showed much more traffic on the queue under swapping load if the check was removed); update its comment. Memcg-v1 move (deprecated): mem_cgroup_move_account() has been changing folio->memcg_data without checking and unqueueing a THP folio from the deferred list, sometimes corrupting "from" memcg's list, like swapout. Refcount is non-zero here, so folio_unqueue_deferred_split() can only be used in a WARN_ON_ONCE to validate the fix, which must be done earlier: mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range() first try to split the THP (splitting of course unqueues), or skip it if that fails. Not ideal, but moving charge has been requested, and khugepaged should repair the THP later: nobody wants new custom unqueueing code just for this deprecated case. The 87eaceb3faa5 commit did have the code to move from one deferred list to another (but was not conscious of its unsafety while refcount non-0); but that was removed by 5.6 commit fac0516b5534 ("mm: thp: don't need care deferred split queue in memcg charge move path"), which argued that the existence of a PMD mapping guarantees that the THP cannot be on a deferred list. As above, false in rare cases, and now commonly false. Backport to 6.11 should be straightforward. Earlier backports must take care that other _deferred_list fixes and dependencies are included. There is not a strong case for backports, but they can fix cornercases. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8dc111ae-f6db-2da7-b25c-7a20b1effe3b@google.com Fixes: 87eaceb3faa5 ("mm: thp: make deferred split shrinker memcg aware") Fixes: dafff3f4c850 ("mm: split underused THPs") Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301(a)gmail.com> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang(a)linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Barry Song <baohua(a)kernel.org> Cc: Chris Li <chrisl(a)kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes(a)cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang(a)huawei.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: Nhat Pham <nphamcs(a)gmail.com> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt(a)linux.dev> Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642(a)gmail.com> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang(a)gmail.com> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy(a)nvidia.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c index a1d345f1680c..03fd4bc39ea1 100644 --- a/mm/huge_memory.c +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -3588,10 +3588,27 @@ int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list) return split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(&folio->page, list, ret); } -void __folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio) +/* + * __folio_unqueue_deferred_split() is not to be called directly: + * the folio_unqueue_deferred_split() inline wrapper in mm/internal.h + * limits its calls to those folios which may have a _deferred_list for + * queueing THP splits, and that list is (racily observed to be) non-empty. + * + * It is unsafe to call folio_unqueue_deferred_split() until folio refcount is + * zero: because even when split_queue_lock is held, a non-empty _deferred_list + * might be in use on deferred_split_scan()'s unlocked on-stack list. + * + * If memory cgroups are enabled, split_queue_lock is in the mem_cgroup: it is + * therefore important to unqueue deferred split before changing folio memcg. + */ +bool __folio_unqueue_deferred_split(struct folio *folio) { struct deferred_split *ds_queue; unsigned long flags; + bool unqueued = false; + + WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_ref_count(folio)); + WARN_ON_ONCE(!mem_cgroup_disabled() && !folio_memcg(folio)); ds_queue = get_deferred_split_queue(folio); spin_lock_irqsave(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags); @@ -3603,8 +3620,11 @@ void __folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio) MTHP_STAT_NR_ANON_PARTIALLY_MAPPED, -1); } list_del_init(&folio->_deferred_list); + unqueued = true; } spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags); + + return unqueued; /* useful for debug warnings */ } /* partially_mapped=false won't clear PG_partially_mapped folio flag */ @@ -3627,14 +3647,11 @@ void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio, bool partially_mapped) return; /* - * The try_to_unmap() in page reclaim path might reach here too, - * this may cause a race condition to corrupt deferred split queue. - * And, if page reclaim is already handling the same folio, it is - * unnecessary to handle it again in shrinker. - * - * Check the swapcache flag to determine if the folio is being - * handled by page reclaim since THP swap would add the folio into - * swap cache before calling try_to_unmap(). + * Exclude swapcache: originally to avoid a corrupt deferred split + * queue. Nowadays that is fully prevented by mem_cgroup_swapout(); + * but if page reclaim is already handling the same folio, it is + * unnecessary to handle it again in the shrinker, so excluding + * swapcache here may still be a useful optimization. */ if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) return; diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h index 93083bbeeefa..16c1f3cd599e 100644 --- a/mm/internal.h +++ b/mm/internal.h @@ -639,11 +639,11 @@ static inline void folio_set_order(struct folio *folio, unsigned int order) #endif } -void __folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio); -static inline void folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio) +bool __folio_unqueue_deferred_split(struct folio *folio); +static inline bool folio_unqueue_deferred_split(struct folio *folio) { if (folio_order(folio) <= 1 || !folio_test_large_rmappable(folio)) - return; + return false; /* * At this point, there is no one trying to add the folio to @@ -651,9 +651,9 @@ static inline void folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio) * to check without acquiring the split_queue_lock. */ if (data_race(list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list))) - return; + return false; - __folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + return __folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); } static inline struct folio *page_rmappable_folio(struct page *page) diff --git a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c index 81d8819f13cd..f8744f5630bb 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c @@ -848,6 +848,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct folio *folio, css_get(&to->css); css_put(&from->css); + /* Warning should never happen, so don't worry about refcount non-0 */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio)); folio->memcg_data = (unsigned long)to; __folio_memcg_unlock(from); @@ -1217,7 +1219,9 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, enum mc_target_type target_type; union mc_target target; struct folio *folio; + bool tried_split_before = false; +retry_pmd: ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma); if (ptl) { if (mc.precharge < HPAGE_PMD_NR) { @@ -1227,6 +1231,27 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, target_type = get_mctgt_type_thp(vma, addr, *pmd, &target); if (target_type == MC_TARGET_PAGE) { folio = target.folio; + /* + * Deferred split queue locking depends on memcg, + * and unqueue is unsafe unless folio refcount is 0: + * split or skip if on the queue? first try to split. + */ + if (!list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) { + spin_unlock(ptl); + if (!tried_split_before) + split_folio(folio); + folio_unlock(folio); + folio_put(folio); + if (tried_split_before) + return 0; + tried_split_before = true; + goto retry_pmd; + } + /* + * So long as that pmd lock is held, the folio cannot + * be racily added to the _deferred_list, because + * __folio_remove_rmap() will find !partially_mapped. + */ if (folio_isolate_lru(folio)) { if (!mem_cgroup_move_account(folio, true, mc.from, mc.to)) { diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 2703227cce88..06df2af97415 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -4629,9 +4629,6 @@ static void uncharge_folio(struct folio *folio, struct uncharge_gather *ug) struct obj_cgroup *objcg; VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_lru(folio), folio); - VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_order(folio) > 1 && - !folio_test_hugetlb(folio) && - !list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list), folio); /* * Nobody should be changing or seriously looking at @@ -4678,6 +4675,7 @@ static void uncharge_folio(struct folio *folio, struct uncharge_gather *ug) ug->nr_memory += nr_pages; ug->pgpgout++; + WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio)); folio->memcg_data = 0; } @@ -4789,6 +4787,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_migrate(struct folio *old, struct folio *new) /* Transfer the charge and the css ref */ commit_charge(new, memcg); + + /* Warning should never happen, so don't worry about refcount non-0 */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_unqueue_deferred_split(old)); old->memcg_data = 0; } @@ -4975,6 +4976,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_swapout(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry) VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(oldid, folio); mod_memcg_state(swap_memcg, MEMCG_SWAP, nr_entries); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); folio->memcg_data = 0; if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c index fab84a776088..dfa24e41e8f9 100644 --- a/mm/migrate.c +++ b/mm/migrate.c @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ static int __folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, folio_test_large_rmappable(folio)) { if (!folio_ref_freeze(folio, expected_count)) return -EAGAIN; - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); folio_ref_unfreeze(folio, expected_count); } @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static int __folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, } /* Take off deferred split queue while frozen and memcg set */ - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); /* * Now we know that no one else is looking at the folio: diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 5e108ae755cc..8ad38cd5e574 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -2681,7 +2681,6 @@ void free_unref_folios(struct folio_batch *folios) unsigned long pfn = folio_pfn(folio); unsigned int order = folio_order(folio); - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); if (!free_pages_prepare(&folio->page, order)) continue; /* diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c index 835bdf324b76..b8e3259ea2c4 100644 --- a/mm/swap.c +++ b/mm/swap.c @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ void __folio_put(struct folio *folio) } page_cache_release(folio); - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); mem_cgroup_uncharge(folio); free_unref_page(&folio->page, folio_order(folio)); } @@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ void folios_put_refs(struct folio_batch *folios, unsigned int *refs) free_huge_folio(folio); continue; } - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); __page_cache_release(folio, &lruvec, &flags); if (j != i) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index ddaaff67642e..28ba2b06fc7d 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1476,7 +1476,7 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, */ nr_reclaimed += nr_pages; - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); if (folio_batch_add(&free_folios, folio) == 0) { mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(&free_folios); try_to_unmap_flush(); @@ -1864,7 +1864,7 @@ static unsigned int move_folios_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec, if (unlikely(folio_put_testzero(folio))) { __folio_clear_lru_flags(folio); - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); if (folio_batch_add(&free_folios, folio) == 0) { spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock); mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(&free_folios);

1 month, 4 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x f8f931bba0f92052cf842b7e30917b1afcc77d5a # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024111110-silencer-chitchat-1dc6@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From f8f931bba0f92052cf842b7e30917b1afcc77d5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 13:02:13 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking Recent changes are putting more pressure on THP deferred split queues: under load revealing long-standing races, causing list_del corruptions, "Bad page state"s and worse (I keep BUGs in both of those, so usually don't get to see how badly they end up without). The relevant recent changes being 6.8's mTHP, 6.10's mTHP swapout, and 6.12's mTHP swapin, improved swap allocation, and underused THP splitting. Before fixing locking: rename misleading folio_undo_large_rmappable(), which does not undo large_rmappable, to folio_unqueue_deferred_split(), which is what it does. But that and its out-of-line __callee are mm internals of very limited usability: add comment and WARN_ON_ONCEs to check usage; and return a bool to say if a deferred split was unqueued, which can then be used in WARN_ON_ONCEs around safety checks (sparing callers the arcane conditionals in __folio_unqueue_deferred_split()). Just omit the folio_unqueue_deferred_split() from free_unref_folios(), all of whose callers now call it beforehand (and if any forget then bad_page() will tell) - except for its caller put_pages_list(), which itself no longer has any callers (and will be deleted separately). Swapout: mem_cgroup_swapout() has been resetting folio->memcg_data 0 without checking and unqueueing a THP folio from deferred split list; which is unfortunate, since the split_queue_lock depends on the memcg (when memcg is enabled); so swapout has been unqueueing such THPs later, when freeing the folio, using the pgdat's lock instead: potentially corrupting the memcg's list. __remove_mapping() has frozen refcount to 0 here, so no problem with calling folio_unqueue_deferred_split() before resetting memcg_data. That goes back to 5.4 commit 87eaceb3faa5 ("mm: thp: make deferred split shrinker memcg aware"): which included a check on swapcache before adding to deferred queue, but no check on deferred queue before adding THP to swapcache. That worked fine with the usual sequence of events in reclaim (though there were a couple of rare ways in which a THP on deferred queue could have been swapped out), but 6.12 commit dafff3f4c850 ("mm: split underused THPs") avoids splitting underused THPs in reclaim, which makes swapcache THPs on deferred queue commonplace. Keep the check on swapcache before adding to deferred queue? Yes: it is no longer essential, but preserves the existing behaviour, and is likely to be a worthwhile optimization (vmstat showed much more traffic on the queue under swapping load if the check was removed); update its comment. Memcg-v1 move (deprecated): mem_cgroup_move_account() has been changing folio->memcg_data without checking and unqueueing a THP folio from the deferred list, sometimes corrupting "from" memcg's list, like swapout. Refcount is non-zero here, so folio_unqueue_deferred_split() can only be used in a WARN_ON_ONCE to validate the fix, which must be done earlier: mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range() first try to split the THP (splitting of course unqueues), or skip it if that fails. Not ideal, but moving charge has been requested, and khugepaged should repair the THP later: nobody wants new custom unqueueing code just for this deprecated case. The 87eaceb3faa5 commit did have the code to move from one deferred list to another (but was not conscious of its unsafety while refcount non-0); but that was removed by 5.6 commit fac0516b5534 ("mm: thp: don't need care deferred split queue in memcg charge move path"), which argued that the existence of a PMD mapping guarantees that the THP cannot be on a deferred list. As above, false in rare cases, and now commonly false. Backport to 6.11 should be straightforward. Earlier backports must take care that other _deferred_list fixes and dependencies are included. There is not a strong case for backports, but they can fix cornercases. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8dc111ae-f6db-2da7-b25c-7a20b1effe3b@google.com Fixes: 87eaceb3faa5 ("mm: thp: make deferred split shrinker memcg aware") Fixes: dafff3f4c850 ("mm: split underused THPs") Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301(a)gmail.com> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang(a)linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Barry Song <baohua(a)kernel.org> Cc: Chris Li <chrisl(a)kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes(a)cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang(a)huawei.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: Nhat Pham <nphamcs(a)gmail.com> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt(a)linux.dev> Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642(a)gmail.com> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang(a)gmail.com> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy(a)nvidia.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c index a1d345f1680c..03fd4bc39ea1 100644 --- a/mm/huge_memory.c +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -3588,10 +3588,27 @@ int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list) return split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(&folio->page, list, ret); } -void __folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio) +/* + * __folio_unqueue_deferred_split() is not to be called directly: + * the folio_unqueue_deferred_split() inline wrapper in mm/internal.h + * limits its calls to those folios which may have a _deferred_list for + * queueing THP splits, and that list is (racily observed to be) non-empty. + * + * It is unsafe to call folio_unqueue_deferred_split() until folio refcount is + * zero: because even when split_queue_lock is held, a non-empty _deferred_list + * might be in use on deferred_split_scan()'s unlocked on-stack list. + * + * If memory cgroups are enabled, split_queue_lock is in the mem_cgroup: it is + * therefore important to unqueue deferred split before changing folio memcg. + */ +bool __folio_unqueue_deferred_split(struct folio *folio) { struct deferred_split *ds_queue; unsigned long flags; + bool unqueued = false; + + WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_ref_count(folio)); + WARN_ON_ONCE(!mem_cgroup_disabled() && !folio_memcg(folio)); ds_queue = get_deferred_split_queue(folio); spin_lock_irqsave(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags); @@ -3603,8 +3620,11 @@ void __folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio) MTHP_STAT_NR_ANON_PARTIALLY_MAPPED, -1); } list_del_init(&folio->_deferred_list); + unqueued = true; } spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags); + + return unqueued; /* useful for debug warnings */ } /* partially_mapped=false won't clear PG_partially_mapped folio flag */ @@ -3627,14 +3647,11 @@ void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio, bool partially_mapped) return; /* - * The try_to_unmap() in page reclaim path might reach here too, - * this may cause a race condition to corrupt deferred split queue. - * And, if page reclaim is already handling the same folio, it is - * unnecessary to handle it again in shrinker. - * - * Check the swapcache flag to determine if the folio is being - * handled by page reclaim since THP swap would add the folio into - * swap cache before calling try_to_unmap(). + * Exclude swapcache: originally to avoid a corrupt deferred split + * queue. Nowadays that is fully prevented by mem_cgroup_swapout(); + * but if page reclaim is already handling the same folio, it is + * unnecessary to handle it again in the shrinker, so excluding + * swapcache here may still be a useful optimization. */ if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) return; diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h index 93083bbeeefa..16c1f3cd599e 100644 --- a/mm/internal.h +++ b/mm/internal.h @@ -639,11 +639,11 @@ static inline void folio_set_order(struct folio *folio, unsigned int order) #endif } -void __folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio); -static inline void folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio) +bool __folio_unqueue_deferred_split(struct folio *folio); +static inline bool folio_unqueue_deferred_split(struct folio *folio) { if (folio_order(folio) <= 1 || !folio_test_large_rmappable(folio)) - return; + return false; /* * At this point, there is no one trying to add the folio to @@ -651,9 +651,9 @@ static inline void folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio) * to check without acquiring the split_queue_lock. */ if (data_race(list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list))) - return; + return false; - __folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + return __folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); } static inline struct folio *page_rmappable_folio(struct page *page) diff --git a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c index 81d8819f13cd..f8744f5630bb 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c @@ -848,6 +848,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct folio *folio, css_get(&to->css); css_put(&from->css); + /* Warning should never happen, so don't worry about refcount non-0 */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio)); folio->memcg_data = (unsigned long)to; __folio_memcg_unlock(from); @@ -1217,7 +1219,9 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, enum mc_target_type target_type; union mc_target target; struct folio *folio; + bool tried_split_before = false; +retry_pmd: ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma); if (ptl) { if (mc.precharge < HPAGE_PMD_NR) { @@ -1227,6 +1231,27 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, target_type = get_mctgt_type_thp(vma, addr, *pmd, &target); if (target_type == MC_TARGET_PAGE) { folio = target.folio; + /* + * Deferred split queue locking depends on memcg, + * and unqueue is unsafe unless folio refcount is 0: + * split or skip if on the queue? first try to split. + */ + if (!list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) { + spin_unlock(ptl); + if (!tried_split_before) + split_folio(folio); + folio_unlock(folio); + folio_put(folio); + if (tried_split_before) + return 0; + tried_split_before = true; + goto retry_pmd; + } + /* + * So long as that pmd lock is held, the folio cannot + * be racily added to the _deferred_list, because + * __folio_remove_rmap() will find !partially_mapped. + */ if (folio_isolate_lru(folio)) { if (!mem_cgroup_move_account(folio, true, mc.from, mc.to)) { diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 2703227cce88..06df2af97415 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -4629,9 +4629,6 @@ static void uncharge_folio(struct folio *folio, struct uncharge_gather *ug) struct obj_cgroup *objcg; VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_lru(folio), folio); - VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_order(folio) > 1 && - !folio_test_hugetlb(folio) && - !list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list), folio); /* * Nobody should be changing or seriously looking at @@ -4678,6 +4675,7 @@ static void uncharge_folio(struct folio *folio, struct uncharge_gather *ug) ug->nr_memory += nr_pages; ug->pgpgout++; + WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio)); folio->memcg_data = 0; } @@ -4789,6 +4787,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_migrate(struct folio *old, struct folio *new) /* Transfer the charge and the css ref */ commit_charge(new, memcg); + + /* Warning should never happen, so don't worry about refcount non-0 */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_unqueue_deferred_split(old)); old->memcg_data = 0; } @@ -4975,6 +4976,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_swapout(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry) VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(oldid, folio); mod_memcg_state(swap_memcg, MEMCG_SWAP, nr_entries); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); folio->memcg_data = 0; if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c index fab84a776088..dfa24e41e8f9 100644 --- a/mm/migrate.c +++ b/mm/migrate.c @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ static int __folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, folio_test_large_rmappable(folio)) { if (!folio_ref_freeze(folio, expected_count)) return -EAGAIN; - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); folio_ref_unfreeze(folio, expected_count); } @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static int __folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, } /* Take off deferred split queue while frozen and memcg set */ - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); /* * Now we know that no one else is looking at the folio: diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 5e108ae755cc..8ad38cd5e574 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -2681,7 +2681,6 @@ void free_unref_folios(struct folio_batch *folios) unsigned long pfn = folio_pfn(folio); unsigned int order = folio_order(folio); - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); if (!free_pages_prepare(&folio->page, order)) continue; /* diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c index 835bdf324b76..b8e3259ea2c4 100644 --- a/mm/swap.c +++ b/mm/swap.c @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ void __folio_put(struct folio *folio) } page_cache_release(folio); - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); mem_cgroup_uncharge(folio); free_unref_page(&folio->page, folio_order(folio)); } @@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ void folios_put_refs(struct folio_batch *folios, unsigned int *refs) free_huge_folio(folio); continue; } - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); __page_cache_release(folio, &lruvec, &flags); if (j != i) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index ddaaff67642e..28ba2b06fc7d 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1476,7 +1476,7 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, */ nr_reclaimed += nr_pages; - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); if (folio_batch_add(&free_folios, folio) == 0) { mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(&free_folios); try_to_unmap_flush(); @@ -1864,7 +1864,7 @@ static unsigned int move_folios_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec, if (unlikely(folio_put_testzero(folio))) { __folio_clear_lru_flags(folio); - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); if (folio_batch_add(&free_folios, folio) == 0) { spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock); mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(&free_folios);

1 month, 4 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x f8f931bba0f92052cf842b7e30917b1afcc77d5a # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024111108-kangaroo-press-8c50@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From f8f931bba0f92052cf842b7e30917b1afcc77d5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 13:02:13 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking Recent changes are putting more pressure on THP deferred split queues: under load revealing long-standing races, causing list_del corruptions, "Bad page state"s and worse (I keep BUGs in both of those, so usually don't get to see how badly they end up without). The relevant recent changes being 6.8's mTHP, 6.10's mTHP swapout, and 6.12's mTHP swapin, improved swap allocation, and underused THP splitting. Before fixing locking: rename misleading folio_undo_large_rmappable(), which does not undo large_rmappable, to folio_unqueue_deferred_split(), which is what it does. But that and its out-of-line __callee are mm internals of very limited usability: add comment and WARN_ON_ONCEs to check usage; and return a bool to say if a deferred split was unqueued, which can then be used in WARN_ON_ONCEs around safety checks (sparing callers the arcane conditionals in __folio_unqueue_deferred_split()). Just omit the folio_unqueue_deferred_split() from free_unref_folios(), all of whose callers now call it beforehand (and if any forget then bad_page() will tell) - except for its caller put_pages_list(), which itself no longer has any callers (and will be deleted separately). Swapout: mem_cgroup_swapout() has been resetting folio->memcg_data 0 without checking and unqueueing a THP folio from deferred split list; which is unfortunate, since the split_queue_lock depends on the memcg (when memcg is enabled); so swapout has been unqueueing such THPs later, when freeing the folio, using the pgdat's lock instead: potentially corrupting the memcg's list. __remove_mapping() has frozen refcount to 0 here, so no problem with calling folio_unqueue_deferred_split() before resetting memcg_data. That goes back to 5.4 commit 87eaceb3faa5 ("mm: thp: make deferred split shrinker memcg aware"): which included a check on swapcache before adding to deferred queue, but no check on deferred queue before adding THP to swapcache. That worked fine with the usual sequence of events in reclaim (though there were a couple of rare ways in which a THP on deferred queue could have been swapped out), but 6.12 commit dafff3f4c850 ("mm: split underused THPs") avoids splitting underused THPs in reclaim, which makes swapcache THPs on deferred queue commonplace. Keep the check on swapcache before adding to deferred queue? Yes: it is no longer essential, but preserves the existing behaviour, and is likely to be a worthwhile optimization (vmstat showed much more traffic on the queue under swapping load if the check was removed); update its comment. Memcg-v1 move (deprecated): mem_cgroup_move_account() has been changing folio->memcg_data without checking and unqueueing a THP folio from the deferred list, sometimes corrupting "from" memcg's list, like swapout. Refcount is non-zero here, so folio_unqueue_deferred_split() can only be used in a WARN_ON_ONCE to validate the fix, which must be done earlier: mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range() first try to split the THP (splitting of course unqueues), or skip it if that fails. Not ideal, but moving charge has been requested, and khugepaged should repair the THP later: nobody wants new custom unqueueing code just for this deprecated case. The 87eaceb3faa5 commit did have the code to move from one deferred list to another (but was not conscious of its unsafety while refcount non-0); but that was removed by 5.6 commit fac0516b5534 ("mm: thp: don't need care deferred split queue in memcg charge move path"), which argued that the existence of a PMD mapping guarantees that the THP cannot be on a deferred list. As above, false in rare cases, and now commonly false. Backport to 6.11 should be straightforward. Earlier backports must take care that other _deferred_list fixes and dependencies are included. There is not a strong case for backports, but they can fix cornercases. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8dc111ae-f6db-2da7-b25c-7a20b1effe3b@google.com Fixes: 87eaceb3faa5 ("mm: thp: make deferred split shrinker memcg aware") Fixes: dafff3f4c850 ("mm: split underused THPs") Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd(a)google.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301(a)gmail.com> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang(a)linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Barry Song <baohua(a)kernel.org> Cc: Chris Li <chrisl(a)kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes(a)cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang(a)huawei.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: Nhat Pham <nphamcs(a)gmail.com> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt(a)linux.dev> Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642(a)gmail.com> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang(a)gmail.com> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy(a)nvidia.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c index a1d345f1680c..03fd4bc39ea1 100644 --- a/mm/huge_memory.c +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -3588,10 +3588,27 @@ int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list) return split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(&folio->page, list, ret); } -void __folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio) +/* + * __folio_unqueue_deferred_split() is not to be called directly: + * the folio_unqueue_deferred_split() inline wrapper in mm/internal.h + * limits its calls to those folios which may have a _deferred_list for + * queueing THP splits, and that list is (racily observed to be) non-empty. + * + * It is unsafe to call folio_unqueue_deferred_split() until folio refcount is + * zero: because even when split_queue_lock is held, a non-empty _deferred_list + * might be in use on deferred_split_scan()'s unlocked on-stack list. + * + * If memory cgroups are enabled, split_queue_lock is in the mem_cgroup: it is + * therefore important to unqueue deferred split before changing folio memcg. + */ +bool __folio_unqueue_deferred_split(struct folio *folio) { struct deferred_split *ds_queue; unsigned long flags; + bool unqueued = false; + + WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_ref_count(folio)); + WARN_ON_ONCE(!mem_cgroup_disabled() && !folio_memcg(folio)); ds_queue = get_deferred_split_queue(folio); spin_lock_irqsave(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags); @@ -3603,8 +3620,11 @@ void __folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio) MTHP_STAT_NR_ANON_PARTIALLY_MAPPED, -1); } list_del_init(&folio->_deferred_list); + unqueued = true; } spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags); + + return unqueued; /* useful for debug warnings */ } /* partially_mapped=false won't clear PG_partially_mapped folio flag */ @@ -3627,14 +3647,11 @@ void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio, bool partially_mapped) return; /* - * The try_to_unmap() in page reclaim path might reach here too, - * this may cause a race condition to corrupt deferred split queue. - * And, if page reclaim is already handling the same folio, it is - * unnecessary to handle it again in shrinker. - * - * Check the swapcache flag to determine if the folio is being - * handled by page reclaim since THP swap would add the folio into - * swap cache before calling try_to_unmap(). + * Exclude swapcache: originally to avoid a corrupt deferred split + * queue. Nowadays that is fully prevented by mem_cgroup_swapout(); + * but if page reclaim is already handling the same folio, it is + * unnecessary to handle it again in the shrinker, so excluding + * swapcache here may still be a useful optimization. */ if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) return; diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h index 93083bbeeefa..16c1f3cd599e 100644 --- a/mm/internal.h +++ b/mm/internal.h @@ -639,11 +639,11 @@ static inline void folio_set_order(struct folio *folio, unsigned int order) #endif } -void __folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio); -static inline void folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio) +bool __folio_unqueue_deferred_split(struct folio *folio); +static inline bool folio_unqueue_deferred_split(struct folio *folio) { if (folio_order(folio) <= 1 || !folio_test_large_rmappable(folio)) - return; + return false; /* * At this point, there is no one trying to add the folio to @@ -651,9 +651,9 @@ static inline void folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio) * to check without acquiring the split_queue_lock. */ if (data_race(list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list))) - return; + return false; - __folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + return __folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); } static inline struct folio *page_rmappable_folio(struct page *page) diff --git a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c index 81d8819f13cd..f8744f5630bb 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c @@ -848,6 +848,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct folio *folio, css_get(&to->css); css_put(&from->css); + /* Warning should never happen, so don't worry about refcount non-0 */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio)); folio->memcg_data = (unsigned long)to; __folio_memcg_unlock(from); @@ -1217,7 +1219,9 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, enum mc_target_type target_type; union mc_target target; struct folio *folio; + bool tried_split_before = false; +retry_pmd: ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma); if (ptl) { if (mc.precharge < HPAGE_PMD_NR) { @@ -1227,6 +1231,27 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, target_type = get_mctgt_type_thp(vma, addr, *pmd, &target); if (target_type == MC_TARGET_PAGE) { folio = target.folio; + /* + * Deferred split queue locking depends on memcg, + * and unqueue is unsafe unless folio refcount is 0: + * split or skip if on the queue? first try to split. + */ + if (!list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) { + spin_unlock(ptl); + if (!tried_split_before) + split_folio(folio); + folio_unlock(folio); + folio_put(folio); + if (tried_split_before) + return 0; + tried_split_before = true; + goto retry_pmd; + } + /* + * So long as that pmd lock is held, the folio cannot + * be racily added to the _deferred_list, because + * __folio_remove_rmap() will find !partially_mapped. + */ if (folio_isolate_lru(folio)) { if (!mem_cgroup_move_account(folio, true, mc.from, mc.to)) { diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 2703227cce88..06df2af97415 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -4629,9 +4629,6 @@ static void uncharge_folio(struct folio *folio, struct uncharge_gather *ug) struct obj_cgroup *objcg; VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_lru(folio), folio); - VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_order(folio) > 1 && - !folio_test_hugetlb(folio) && - !list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list), folio); /* * Nobody should be changing or seriously looking at @@ -4678,6 +4675,7 @@ static void uncharge_folio(struct folio *folio, struct uncharge_gather *ug) ug->nr_memory += nr_pages; ug->pgpgout++; + WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio)); folio->memcg_data = 0; } @@ -4789,6 +4787,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_migrate(struct folio *old, struct folio *new) /* Transfer the charge and the css ref */ commit_charge(new, memcg); + + /* Warning should never happen, so don't worry about refcount non-0 */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_unqueue_deferred_split(old)); old->memcg_data = 0; } @@ -4975,6 +4976,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_swapout(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry) VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(oldid, folio); mod_memcg_state(swap_memcg, MEMCG_SWAP, nr_entries); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); folio->memcg_data = 0; if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c index fab84a776088..dfa24e41e8f9 100644 --- a/mm/migrate.c +++ b/mm/migrate.c @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ static int __folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, folio_test_large_rmappable(folio)) { if (!folio_ref_freeze(folio, expected_count)) return -EAGAIN; - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); folio_ref_unfreeze(folio, expected_count); } @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static int __folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, } /* Take off deferred split queue while frozen and memcg set */ - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); /* * Now we know that no one else is looking at the folio: diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 5e108ae755cc..8ad38cd5e574 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -2681,7 +2681,6 @@ void free_unref_folios(struct folio_batch *folios) unsigned long pfn = folio_pfn(folio); unsigned int order = folio_order(folio); - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); if (!free_pages_prepare(&folio->page, order)) continue; /* diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c index 835bdf324b76..b8e3259ea2c4 100644 --- a/mm/swap.c +++ b/mm/swap.c @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ void __folio_put(struct folio *folio) } page_cache_release(folio); - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); mem_cgroup_uncharge(folio); free_unref_page(&folio->page, folio_order(folio)); } @@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ void folios_put_refs(struct folio_batch *folios, unsigned int *refs) free_huge_folio(folio); continue; } - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); __page_cache_release(folio, &lruvec, &flags); if (j != i) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index ddaaff67642e..28ba2b06fc7d 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1476,7 +1476,7 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, */ nr_reclaimed += nr_pages; - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); if (folio_batch_add(&free_folios, folio) == 0) { mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(&free_folios); try_to_unmap_flush(); @@ -1864,7 +1864,7 @@ static unsigned int move_folios_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec, if (unlikely(folio_put_testzero(folio))) { __folio_clear_lru_flags(folio); - folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio); + folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio); if (folio_batch_add(&free_folios, folio) == 0) { spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock); mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(&free_folios);

1 month, 4 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] signal: restore the override_rlimit logic" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 9e05e5c7ee8758141d2db7e8fea2cab34500c6ed # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024111159-repaying-whole-1063@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 9e05e5c7ee8758141d2db7e8fea2cab34500c6ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin(a)linux.dev> Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:54:19 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] signal: restore the override_rlimit logic Prior to commit d64696905554 ("Reimplement RLIMIT_SIGPENDING on top of ucounts") UCOUNT_RLIMIT_SIGPENDING rlimit was not enforced for a class of signals. However now it's enforced unconditionally, even if override_rlimit is set. This behavior change caused production issues. For example, if the limit is reached and a process receives a SIGSEGV signal, sigqueue_alloc fails to allocate the necessary resources for the signal delivery, preventing the signal from being delivered with siginfo. This prevents the process from correctly identifying the fault address and handling the error. From the user-space perspective, applications are unaware that the limit has been reached and that the siginfo is effectively 'corrupted'. This can lead to unpredictable behavior and crashes, as we observed with java applications. Fix this by passing override_rlimit into inc_rlimit_get_ucounts() and skip the comparison to max there if override_rlimit is set. This effectively restores the old behavior. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104195419.3962584-1-roman.gushchin@linux.dev Fixes: d64696905554 ("Reimplement RLIMIT_SIGPENDING on top of ucounts") Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin(a)linux.dev> Co-developed-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin(a)google.com> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg(a)redhat.com> Acked-by: Alexey Gladkov <legion(a)kernel.org> Cc: Kees Cook <kees(a)kernel.org> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm(a)xmission.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/include/linux/user_namespace.h b/include/linux/user_namespace.h index 3625096d5f85..7183e5aca282 100644 --- a/include/linux/user_namespace.h +++ b/include/linux/user_namespace.h @@ -141,7 +141,8 @@ static inline long get_rlimit_value(struct ucounts *ucounts, enum rlimit_type ty long inc_rlimit_ucounts(struct ucounts *ucounts, enum rlimit_type type, long v); bool dec_rlimit_ucounts(struct ucounts *ucounts, enum rlimit_type type, long v); -long inc_rlimit_get_ucounts(struct ucounts *ucounts, enum rlimit_type type); +long inc_rlimit_get_ucounts(struct ucounts *ucounts, enum rlimit_type type, + bool override_rlimit); void dec_rlimit_put_ucounts(struct ucounts *ucounts, enum rlimit_type type); bool is_rlimit_overlimit(struct ucounts *ucounts, enum rlimit_type type, unsigned long max); diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index 4344860ffcac..cbabb2d05e0a 100644 --- a/kernel/signal.c +++ b/kernel/signal.c @@ -419,7 +419,8 @@ __sigqueue_alloc(int sig, struct task_struct *t, gfp_t gfp_flags, */ rcu_read_lock(); ucounts = task_ucounts(t); - sigpending = inc_rlimit_get_ucounts(ucounts, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_SIGPENDING); + sigpending = inc_rlimit_get_ucounts(ucounts, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_SIGPENDING, + override_rlimit); rcu_read_unlock(); if (!sigpending) return NULL; diff --git a/kernel/ucount.c b/kernel/ucount.c index 9469102c5ac0..696406939be5 100644 --- a/kernel/ucount.c +++ b/kernel/ucount.c @@ -307,7 +307,8 @@ void dec_rlimit_put_ucounts(struct ucounts *ucounts, enum rlimit_type type) do_dec_rlimit_put_ucounts(ucounts, NULL, type); } -long inc_rlimit_get_ucounts(struct ucounts *ucounts, enum rlimit_type type) +long inc_rlimit_get_ucounts(struct ucounts *ucounts, enum rlimit_type type, + bool override_rlimit) { /* Caller must hold a reference to ucounts */ struct ucounts *iter; @@ -320,7 +321,8 @@ long inc_rlimit_get_ucounts(struct ucounts *ucounts, enum rlimit_type type) goto dec_unwind; if (iter == ucounts) ret = new; - max = get_userns_rlimit_max(iter->ns, type); + if (!override_rlimit) + max = get_userns_rlimit_max(iter->ns, type); /* * Grab an extra ucount reference for the caller when * the rlimit count was previously 0.

1 month, 4 weeks

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v2 06/25] ASoC: sh: rz-ssi: Terminate all the DMA transactions

by Claudiu

From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj(a)bp.renesas.com> In case of full duplex the 1st closed stream doesn't benefit from the dmaengine_terminate_async(). Call it after the companion stream is closed. Fixes: 26ac471c5354 ("ASoC: sh: rz-ssi: Add SSI DMAC support") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj(a)bp.renesas.com> --- Changes in v2: - none sound/soc/renesas/rz-ssi.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/renesas/rz-ssi.c b/sound/soc/renesas/rz-ssi.c index 6efd017aaa7f..2d8721156099 100644 --- a/sound/soc/renesas/rz-ssi.c +++ b/sound/soc/renesas/rz-ssi.c @@ -415,8 +415,12 @@ static int rz_ssi_stop(struct rz_ssi_priv *ssi, struct rz_ssi_stream *strm) rz_ssi_reg_mask_setl(ssi, SSICR, SSICR_TEN | SSICR_REN, 0); /* Cancel all remaining DMA transactions */ - if (rz_ssi_is_dma_enabled(ssi)) - dmaengine_terminate_async(strm->dma_ch); + if (rz_ssi_is_dma_enabled(ssi)) { + if (ssi->playback.dma_ch) + dmaengine_terminate_async(ssi->playback.dma_ch); + if (ssi->capture.dma_ch) + dmaengine_terminate_async(ssi->capture.dma_ch); + } rz_ssi_set_idle(ssi); -- 2.39.2

1 month, 4 weeks

4
4
0 0

[PATCH v2] drm/xe: improve hibernation on igpu

by Matthew Auld

The GGTT looks to be stored inside stolen memory on igpu which is not treated as normal RAM. The core kernel skips this memory range when creating the hibernation image, therefore when coming back from hibernation the GGTT programming is lost. This seems to cause issues with broken resume where GuC FW fails to load: [drm] *ERROR* GT0: load failed: status = 0x400000A0, time = 10ms, freq = 1250MHz (req 1300MHz), done = -1 [drm] *ERROR* GT0: load failed: status: Reset = 0, BootROM = 0x50, UKernel = 0x00, MIA = 0x00, Auth = 0x01 [drm] *ERROR* GT0: firmware signature verification failed [drm] *ERROR* CRITICAL: Xe has declared device 0000:00:02.0 as wedged. Current GGTT users are kernel internal and tracked as pinned, so it should be possible to hook into the existing save/restore logic that we use for dgpu, where the actual evict is skipped but on restore we importantly restore the GGTT programming. This has been confirmed to fix hibernation on at least ADL and MTL, though likely all igpu platforms are affected. This also means we have a hole in our testing, where the existing s4 tests only really test the driver hooks, and don't go as far as actually rebooting and restoring from the hibernation image and in turn powering down RAM (and therefore losing the contents of stolen). v2 (Brost) - Remove extra newline and drop unnecessary parentheses. Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs") Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/3275 Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld(a)intel.com> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost(a)intel.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> # v6.8+ Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost(a)intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 37 ++++++++++++++------------------ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_evict.c | 6 ------ 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c index 8286cbc23721..549866da5cd1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c @@ -952,7 +952,10 @@ int xe_bo_restore_pinned(struct xe_bo *bo) if (WARN_ON(!xe_bo_is_pinned(bo))) return -EINVAL; - if (WARN_ON(xe_bo_is_vram(bo) || !bo->ttm.ttm)) + if (WARN_ON(xe_bo_is_vram(bo))) + return -EINVAL; + + if (WARN_ON(!bo->ttm.ttm && !xe_bo_is_stolen(bo))) return -EINVAL; if (!mem_type_is_vram(place->mem_type)) @@ -1774,6 +1777,7 @@ int xe_bo_pin_external(struct xe_bo *bo) int xe_bo_pin(struct xe_bo *bo) { + struct ttm_place *place = &bo->placements[0]; struct xe_device *xe = xe_bo_device(bo); int err; @@ -1804,8 +1808,6 @@ int xe_bo_pin(struct xe_bo *bo) */ if (IS_DGFX(xe) && !(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG) && bo->flags & XE_BO_FLAG_INTERNAL_TEST)) { - struct ttm_place *place = &(bo->placements[0]); - if (mem_type_is_vram(place->mem_type)) { xe_assert(xe, place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS); @@ -1813,13 +1815,12 @@ int xe_bo_pin(struct xe_bo *bo) vram_region_gpu_offset(bo->ttm.resource)) >> PAGE_SHIFT; place->lpfn = place->fpfn + (bo->size >> PAGE_SHIFT); } + } - if (mem_type_is_vram(place->mem_type) || - bo->flags & XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT) { - spin_lock(&xe->pinned.lock); - list_add_tail(&bo->pinned_link, &xe->pinned.kernel_bo_present); - spin_unlock(&xe->pinned.lock); - } + if (mem_type_is_vram(place->mem_type) || bo->flags & XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT) { + spin_lock(&xe->pinned.lock); + list_add_tail(&bo->pinned_link, &xe->pinned.kernel_bo_present); + spin_unlock(&xe->pinned.lock); } ttm_bo_pin(&bo->ttm); @@ -1867,24 +1868,18 @@ void xe_bo_unpin_external(struct xe_bo *bo) void xe_bo_unpin(struct xe_bo *bo) { + struct ttm_place *place = &bo->placements[0]; struct xe_device *xe = xe_bo_device(bo); xe_assert(xe, !bo->ttm.base.import_attach); xe_assert(xe, xe_bo_is_pinned(bo)); - if (IS_DGFX(xe) && !(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG) && - bo->flags & XE_BO_FLAG_INTERNAL_TEST)) { - struct ttm_place *place = &(bo->placements[0]); - - if (mem_type_is_vram(place->mem_type) || - bo->flags & XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT) { - spin_lock(&xe->pinned.lock); - xe_assert(xe, !list_empty(&bo->pinned_link)); - list_del_init(&bo->pinned_link); - spin_unlock(&xe->pinned.lock); - } + if (mem_type_is_vram(place->mem_type) || bo->flags & XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT) { + spin_lock(&xe->pinned.lock); + xe_assert(xe, !list_empty(&bo->pinned_link)); + list_del_init(&bo->pinned_link); + spin_unlock(&xe->pinned.lock); } - ttm_bo_unpin(&bo->ttm); } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_evict.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_evict.c index 32043e1e5a86..b01bc20eb90b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_evict.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_evict.c @@ -34,9 +34,6 @@ int xe_bo_evict_all(struct xe_device *xe) u8 id; int ret; - if (!IS_DGFX(xe)) - return 0; - /* User memory */ for (mem_type = XE_PL_VRAM0; mem_type <= XE_PL_VRAM1; ++mem_type) { struct ttm_resource_manager *man = @@ -125,9 +122,6 @@ int xe_bo_restore_kernel(struct xe_device *xe) struct xe_bo *bo; int ret; - if (!IS_DGFX(xe)) - return 0; - spin_lock(&xe->pinned.lock); for (;;) { bo = list_first_entry_or_null(&xe->pinned.evicted, -- 2.47.0

1 month, 4 weeks

4
10
0 0

[PATCH v3 0/3] Fix bugs in qla2xxx driver

by Anastasia Kovaleva

This series of patches contains 3 separate changes that fix some bugs in the qla2xxx driver. --- v3: - Fix build issue in patch 1 v2: - Change a spinlock wrap to a WRITE_ONCE() in patch 1 - Add Reviewed-by tags on patches 2 and 3 --- Anastasia Kovaleva (3): scsi: qla2xxx: Drop starvation counter on success scsi: qla2xxx: Make target send correct LOGO scsi: qla2xxx: Remove incorrect trap drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_iocb.c | 11 +++++++++++ drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_isr.c | 4 ++++ drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c | 16 +++++++--------- 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) -- 2.40.1

1 month, 4 weeks

2
6
0 0

[PATCH v2 0/2] usb: typec: ucsi: glink: fix and improve orientation handling

by Dmitry Baryshkov

Fix an off-by-one issue which resulted in USB-C connector #2 orientation being reported as unknown. While we are at it, correct the way we set orientation_aware flag for the USB-C connectors. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov(a)linaro.org> --- Changes in v2: - Added cc:stable to the first patch (Greg's bot) - Expanded the commit message for the second patch. - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241106-ucsi-glue-fixes-v1-0-d0183d78c522@linaro… --- Dmitry Baryshkov (2): usb: typec: ucsi: glink: fix off-by-one in connector_status usb: typec: ucsi: glink: be more precise on orientation-aware ports drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_glink.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- base-commit: 0a2598971f04649933bd38f5db241b3bf23c04ec change-id: 20241106-ucsi-glue-fixes-a20e2b2a0e3a Best regards, -- Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov(a)linaro.org>

1 month, 4 weeks

2
2
0 0

[PATCH 3/6] arm64/kvm: Configure HYP TCR.PS/DS based on host stage1

by Ard Biesheuvel

From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb(a)kernel.org> When the host stage1 is configured for LPA2, the value currently being programmed into TCR_EL2.T0SZ may be invalid unless LPA2 is configured at HYP as well. This means kvm_lpa2_is_enabled() is not the right condition to test when setting TCR_EL2.DS, as it will return false if LPA2 is only available for stage 1 but not for stage 2. Similary, programming TCR_EL2.PS based on a limited IPA range due to lack of stage2 LPA2 support could potentially result in problems. So use lpa2_is_enabled() instead, and set the PS field according to the host's IPS, which is capped at 48 bits if LPA2 support is absent or disabled. Whether or not we can make meaningful use of such a configuration is a different question. Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb(a)kernel.org> --- arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c index a0d01c46e408..1d20d86bb9f5 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c @@ -2005,8 +2005,7 @@ static int kvm_init_vector_slots(void) static void __init cpu_prepare_hyp_mode(int cpu, u32 hyp_va_bits) { struct kvm_nvhe_init_params *params = per_cpu_ptr_nvhe_sym(kvm_init_params, cpu); - u64 mmfr0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1); - unsigned long tcr; + unsigned long tcr, ips; /* * Calculate the raw per-cpu offset without a translation from the @@ -2020,6 +2019,7 @@ static void __init cpu_prepare_hyp_mode(int cpu, u32 hyp_va_bits) params->mair_el2 = read_sysreg(mair_el1); tcr = read_sysreg(tcr_el1); + ips = FIELD_GET(TCR_IPS_MASK, tcr); if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_KVM_HVHE)) { tcr |= TCR_EPD1_MASK; } else { @@ -2029,8 +2029,8 @@ static void __init cpu_prepare_hyp_mode(int cpu, u32 hyp_va_bits) tcr &= ~TCR_T0SZ_MASK; tcr |= TCR_T0SZ(hyp_va_bits); tcr &= ~TCR_EL2_PS_MASK; - tcr |= FIELD_PREP(TCR_EL2_PS_MASK, kvm_get_parange(mmfr0)); - if (kvm_lpa2_is_enabled()) + tcr |= FIELD_PREP(TCR_EL2_PS_MASK, ips); + if (lpa2_is_enabled()) tcr |= TCR_EL2_DS; params->tcr_el2 = tcr; -- 2.47.0.277.g8800431eea-goog

1 month, 4 weeks

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror November 2024