October 2024 - Linux-stable-mirror

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block, bfq: fix procress reference leakage for bfqq in merge" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 73aeab373557fa6ee4ae0b742c6211ccd9859280 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100229-lazy-atonable-fd03@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 73aeab373557 ("block, bfq: fix procress reference leakage for bfqq in merge chain") 9778369a2d6c ("block, bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis") 246cf66e300b ("block, bfq: fix uaf for bfqq in bfq_exit_icq_bfqq") 337366e02b37 ("block, bfq: replace 0/1 with false/true in bic apis") 64dc8c732f5c ("block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 73aeab373557fa6ee4ae0b742c6211ccd9859280 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 21:41:49 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] block, bfq: fix procress reference leakage for bfqq in merge chain MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Original state: Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 Process 4 (BIC1) (BIC2) (BIC3) (BIC4) Λ | | | \--------------\ \-------------\ \-------------\| V V V bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4 ref 0 1 2 4 After commit 0e456dba86c7 ("block, bfq: choose the last bfqq from merge chain in bfq_setup_cooperator()"), if P1 issues a new IO: Without the patch: Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 Process 4 (BIC1) (BIC2) (BIC3) (BIC4) Λ | | | \------------------------------\ \-------------\| V V bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4 ref 0 0 2 4 bfqq3 will be used to handle IO from P1, this is not expected, IO should be redirected to bfqq4; With the patch: ------------------------------------------- | | Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 | Process 4 (BIC1) (BIC2) (BIC3) | (BIC4) | | | | \-------------\ \-------------\| V V bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4 ref 0 0 2 4 IO is redirected to bfqq4, however, procress reference of bfqq3 is still 2, while there is only P2 using it. Fix the problem by calling bfq_merge_bfqqs() for each bfqq in the merge chain. Also change bfqq_merge_bfqqs() to return new_bfqq to simplify code. Fixes: 0e456dba86c7 ("block, bfq: choose the last bfqq from merge chain in bfq_setup_cooperator()") Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240909134154.954924-3-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index d5d39974c674..f4192d5411d2 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -3129,10 +3129,12 @@ void bfq_release_process_ref(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq) bfq_put_queue(bfqq); } -static void -bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_io_cq *bic, - struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq) +static struct bfq_queue *bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, + struct bfq_io_cq *bic, + struct bfq_queue *bfqq) { + struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq = bfqq->new_bfqq; + bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd, bfqq, "merging with queue %lu", (unsigned long)new_bfqq->pid); /* Save weight raising and idle window of the merged queues */ @@ -3226,6 +3228,8 @@ bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bfq_reassign_last_bfqq(bfqq, new_bfqq); bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, bfqq); + + return new_bfqq; } static bool bfq_allow_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, @@ -3261,14 +3265,8 @@ static bool bfq_allow_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, * fulfilled, i.e., bic can be redirected to new_bfqq * and bfqq can be put. */ - bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bfqd->bio_bic, bfqq, - new_bfqq); - /* - * If we get here, bio will be queued into new_queue, - * so use new_bfqq to decide whether bio and rq can be - * merged. - */ - bfqq = new_bfqq; + while (bfqq != new_bfqq) + bfqq = bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bfqd->bio_bic, bfqq); /* * Change also bqfd->bio_bfqq, as @@ -5705,9 +5703,7 @@ bfq_do_early_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, * state before killing it. */ bfqq->bic = bic; - bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bic, bfqq, new_bfqq); - - return new_bfqq; + return bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bic, bfqq); } /* @@ -6162,6 +6158,7 @@ static bool __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct request *rq) bool waiting, idle_timer_disabled = false; if (new_bfqq) { + struct bfq_queue *old_bfqq = bfqq; /* * Release the request's reference to the old bfqq * and make sure one is taken to the shared queue. @@ -6178,18 +6175,18 @@ static bool __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct request *rq) * new_bfqq. */ if (bic_to_bfqq(RQ_BIC(rq), true, - bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, rq->bio)) == bfqq) - bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, RQ_BIC(rq), - bfqq, new_bfqq); + bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, rq->bio)) == bfqq) { + while (bfqq != new_bfqq) + bfqq = bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, RQ_BIC(rq), bfqq); + } - bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(bfqq); + bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(old_bfqq); /* * rq is about to be enqueued into new_bfqq, * release rq reference on bfqq */ - bfq_put_queue(bfqq); + bfq_put_queue(old_bfqq); rq->elv.priv[1] = new_bfqq; - bfqq = new_bfqq; } bfq_update_io_thinktime(bfqd, bfqq);

2 weeks, 3 days

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block, bfq: fix uaf for accessing waker_bfqq after splitting" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-4.19.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 1ba0403ac6447f2d63914fb760c44a3b19c44eaf # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100223-gutter-exchange-0c2b@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 4.19.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 1ba0403ac644 ("block, bfq: fix uaf for accessing waker_bfqq after splitting") fd571df0ac5b ("block, bfq: turn bfqq_data into an array in bfq_io_cq") a61230470c8c ("block, bfq: move io_cq-persistent bfqq data into a dedicated struct") 9778369a2d6c ("block, bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis") 246cf66e300b ("block, bfq: fix uaf for bfqq in bfq_exit_icq_bfqq") 337366e02b37 ("block, bfq: replace 0/1 with false/true in bic apis") 64dc8c732f5c ("block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'") a1795c2ccb1e ("bfq: fix waker_bfqq inconsistency crash") dc469ba2e790 ("block/bfq: Use the new blk_opf_t type") f950667356ce ("bfq: Relax waker detection for shared queues") 4e54a2493e58 ("bfq: Get rid of __bio_blkcg() usage") 09f871868080 ("bfq: Track whether bfq_group is still online") ea591cd4eb27 ("bfq: Update cgroup information before merging bio") 3bc5e683c67d ("bfq: Split shared queues on move between cgroups") 70456e5210f4 ("bfq: Avoid false marking of bic as stably merged") f6bad159f5d5 ("block/bfq-iosched.c: use "false" rather than "BLK_RW_ASYNC"") a0725c22cd84 ("bfq: use bfq_bic_lookup in bfq_limit_depth") 1f18b7005b49 ("bfq: Limit waker detection in time") 76f1df88bbc2 ("bfq: Limit number of requests consumed by each cgroup") 44dfa279f117 ("bfq: Store full bitmap depth in bfq_data") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 1ba0403ac6447f2d63914fb760c44a3b19c44eaf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 21:41:48 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] block, bfq: fix uaf for accessing waker_bfqq after splitting After commit 42c306ed7233 ("block, bfq: don't break merge chain in bfq_split_bfqq()"), if the current procress is the last holder of bfqq, the bfqq can be freed after bfq_split_bfqq(). Hence recored the bfqq and then access bfqq->waker_bfqq may trigger UAF. What's more, the waker_bfqq may in the merge chain of bfqq, hence just recored waker_bfqq is still not safe. Fix the problem by adding a helper bfq_waker_bfqq() to check if bfqq->waker_bfqq is in the merge chain, and current procress is the only holder. Fixes: 42c306ed7233 ("block, bfq: don't break merge chain in bfq_split_bfqq()") Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240909134154.954924-2-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index d1bf2b8a3576..d5d39974c674 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -6825,6 +6825,31 @@ static void bfq_prepare_request(struct request *rq) rq->elv.priv[0] = rq->elv.priv[1] = NULL; } +static struct bfq_queue *bfq_waker_bfqq(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) +{ + struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq = bfqq->new_bfqq; + struct bfq_queue *waker_bfqq = bfqq->waker_bfqq; + + if (!waker_bfqq) + return NULL; + + while (new_bfqq) { + if (new_bfqq == waker_bfqq) { + /* + * If waker_bfqq is in the merge chain, and current + * is the only procress. + */ + if (bfqq_process_refs(waker_bfqq) == 1) + return NULL; + break; + } + + new_bfqq = new_bfqq->new_bfqq; + } + + return waker_bfqq; +} + /* * If needed, init rq, allocate bfq data structures associated with * rq, and increment reference counters in the destination bfq_queue @@ -6886,7 +6911,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq) /* If the queue was seeky for too long, break it apart. */ if (bfq_bfqq_coop(bfqq) && bfq_bfqq_split_coop(bfqq) && !bic->bfqq_data[a_idx].stably_merged) { - struct bfq_queue *old_bfqq = bfqq; + struct bfq_queue *waker_bfqq = bfq_waker_bfqq(bfqq); /* Update bic before losing reference to bfqq */ if (bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq)) @@ -6906,7 +6931,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq) bfqq_already_existing = true; if (!bfqq_already_existing) { - bfqq->waker_bfqq = old_bfqq->waker_bfqq; + bfqq->waker_bfqq = waker_bfqq; bfqq->tentative_waker_bfqq = NULL; /* @@ -6916,7 +6941,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq) * woken_list of the waker. See * bfq_check_waker for details. */ - if (bfqq->waker_bfqq) + if (waker_bfqq) hlist_add_head(&bfqq->woken_list_node, &bfqq->waker_bfqq->woken_list); }

2 weeks, 3 days

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block, bfq: fix uaf for accessing waker_bfqq after splitting" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 1ba0403ac6447f2d63914fb760c44a3b19c44eaf # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100222-aliens-ergonomic-4ce2@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 1ba0403ac644 ("block, bfq: fix uaf for accessing waker_bfqq after splitting") fd571df0ac5b ("block, bfq: turn bfqq_data into an array in bfq_io_cq") a61230470c8c ("block, bfq: move io_cq-persistent bfqq data into a dedicated struct") 9778369a2d6c ("block, bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis") 246cf66e300b ("block, bfq: fix uaf for bfqq in bfq_exit_icq_bfqq") 337366e02b37 ("block, bfq: replace 0/1 with false/true in bic apis") 64dc8c732f5c ("block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'") a1795c2ccb1e ("bfq: fix waker_bfqq inconsistency crash") dc469ba2e790 ("block/bfq: Use the new blk_opf_t type") f950667356ce ("bfq: Relax waker detection for shared queues") 4e54a2493e58 ("bfq: Get rid of __bio_blkcg() usage") 09f871868080 ("bfq: Track whether bfq_group is still online") ea591cd4eb27 ("bfq: Update cgroup information before merging bio") 3bc5e683c67d ("bfq: Split shared queues on move between cgroups") 70456e5210f4 ("bfq: Avoid false marking of bic as stably merged") f6bad159f5d5 ("block/bfq-iosched.c: use "false" rather than "BLK_RW_ASYNC"") a0725c22cd84 ("bfq: use bfq_bic_lookup in bfq_limit_depth") 1f18b7005b49 ("bfq: Limit waker detection in time") 76f1df88bbc2 ("bfq: Limit number of requests consumed by each cgroup") 44dfa279f117 ("bfq: Store full bitmap depth in bfq_data") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 1ba0403ac6447f2d63914fb760c44a3b19c44eaf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 21:41:48 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] block, bfq: fix uaf for accessing waker_bfqq after splitting After commit 42c306ed7233 ("block, bfq: don't break merge chain in bfq_split_bfqq()"), if the current procress is the last holder of bfqq, the bfqq can be freed after bfq_split_bfqq(). Hence recored the bfqq and then access bfqq->waker_bfqq may trigger UAF. What's more, the waker_bfqq may in the merge chain of bfqq, hence just recored waker_bfqq is still not safe. Fix the problem by adding a helper bfq_waker_bfqq() to check if bfqq->waker_bfqq is in the merge chain, and current procress is the only holder. Fixes: 42c306ed7233 ("block, bfq: don't break merge chain in bfq_split_bfqq()") Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240909134154.954924-2-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index d1bf2b8a3576..d5d39974c674 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -6825,6 +6825,31 @@ static void bfq_prepare_request(struct request *rq) rq->elv.priv[0] = rq->elv.priv[1] = NULL; } +static struct bfq_queue *bfq_waker_bfqq(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) +{ + struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq = bfqq->new_bfqq; + struct bfq_queue *waker_bfqq = bfqq->waker_bfqq; + + if (!waker_bfqq) + return NULL; + + while (new_bfqq) { + if (new_bfqq == waker_bfqq) { + /* + * If waker_bfqq is in the merge chain, and current + * is the only procress. + */ + if (bfqq_process_refs(waker_bfqq) == 1) + return NULL; + break; + } + + new_bfqq = new_bfqq->new_bfqq; + } + + return waker_bfqq; +} + /* * If needed, init rq, allocate bfq data structures associated with * rq, and increment reference counters in the destination bfq_queue @@ -6886,7 +6911,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq) /* If the queue was seeky for too long, break it apart. */ if (bfq_bfqq_coop(bfqq) && bfq_bfqq_split_coop(bfqq) && !bic->bfqq_data[a_idx].stably_merged) { - struct bfq_queue *old_bfqq = bfqq; + struct bfq_queue *waker_bfqq = bfq_waker_bfqq(bfqq); /* Update bic before losing reference to bfqq */ if (bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq)) @@ -6906,7 +6931,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq) bfqq_already_existing = true; if (!bfqq_already_existing) { - bfqq->waker_bfqq = old_bfqq->waker_bfqq; + bfqq->waker_bfqq = waker_bfqq; bfqq->tentative_waker_bfqq = NULL; /* @@ -6916,7 +6941,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq) * woken_list of the waker. See * bfq_check_waker for details. */ - if (bfqq->waker_bfqq) + if (waker_bfqq) hlist_add_head(&bfqq->woken_list_node, &bfqq->waker_bfqq->woken_list); }

2 weeks, 3 days

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block, bfq: fix uaf for accessing waker_bfqq after splitting" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 1ba0403ac6447f2d63914fb760c44a3b19c44eaf # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100221-radar-unethical-0eaa@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 1ba0403ac644 ("block, bfq: fix uaf for accessing waker_bfqq after splitting") fd571df0ac5b ("block, bfq: turn bfqq_data into an array in bfq_io_cq") a61230470c8c ("block, bfq: move io_cq-persistent bfqq data into a dedicated struct") 9778369a2d6c ("block, bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis") 246cf66e300b ("block, bfq: fix uaf for bfqq in bfq_exit_icq_bfqq") 337366e02b37 ("block, bfq: replace 0/1 with false/true in bic apis") 64dc8c732f5c ("block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'") a1795c2ccb1e ("bfq: fix waker_bfqq inconsistency crash") dc469ba2e790 ("block/bfq: Use the new blk_opf_t type") f950667356ce ("bfq: Relax waker detection for shared queues") 4e54a2493e58 ("bfq: Get rid of __bio_blkcg() usage") 09f871868080 ("bfq: Track whether bfq_group is still online") ea591cd4eb27 ("bfq: Update cgroup information before merging bio") 3bc5e683c67d ("bfq: Split shared queues on move between cgroups") 70456e5210f4 ("bfq: Avoid false marking of bic as stably merged") f6bad159f5d5 ("block/bfq-iosched.c: use "false" rather than "BLK_RW_ASYNC"") a0725c22cd84 ("bfq: use bfq_bic_lookup in bfq_limit_depth") 1f18b7005b49 ("bfq: Limit waker detection in time") 76f1df88bbc2 ("bfq: Limit number of requests consumed by each cgroup") 44dfa279f117 ("bfq: Store full bitmap depth in bfq_data") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 1ba0403ac6447f2d63914fb760c44a3b19c44eaf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 21:41:48 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] block, bfq: fix uaf for accessing waker_bfqq after splitting After commit 42c306ed7233 ("block, bfq: don't break merge chain in bfq_split_bfqq()"), if the current procress is the last holder of bfqq, the bfqq can be freed after bfq_split_bfqq(). Hence recored the bfqq and then access bfqq->waker_bfqq may trigger UAF. What's more, the waker_bfqq may in the merge chain of bfqq, hence just recored waker_bfqq is still not safe. Fix the problem by adding a helper bfq_waker_bfqq() to check if bfqq->waker_bfqq is in the merge chain, and current procress is the only holder. Fixes: 42c306ed7233 ("block, bfq: don't break merge chain in bfq_split_bfqq()") Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240909134154.954924-2-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index d1bf2b8a3576..d5d39974c674 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -6825,6 +6825,31 @@ static void bfq_prepare_request(struct request *rq) rq->elv.priv[0] = rq->elv.priv[1] = NULL; } +static struct bfq_queue *bfq_waker_bfqq(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) +{ + struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq = bfqq->new_bfqq; + struct bfq_queue *waker_bfqq = bfqq->waker_bfqq; + + if (!waker_bfqq) + return NULL; + + while (new_bfqq) { + if (new_bfqq == waker_bfqq) { + /* + * If waker_bfqq is in the merge chain, and current + * is the only procress. + */ + if (bfqq_process_refs(waker_bfqq) == 1) + return NULL; + break; + } + + new_bfqq = new_bfqq->new_bfqq; + } + + return waker_bfqq; +} + /* * If needed, init rq, allocate bfq data structures associated with * rq, and increment reference counters in the destination bfq_queue @@ -6886,7 +6911,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq) /* If the queue was seeky for too long, break it apart. */ if (bfq_bfqq_coop(bfqq) && bfq_bfqq_split_coop(bfqq) && !bic->bfqq_data[a_idx].stably_merged) { - struct bfq_queue *old_bfqq = bfqq; + struct bfq_queue *waker_bfqq = bfq_waker_bfqq(bfqq); /* Update bic before losing reference to bfqq */ if (bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq)) @@ -6906,7 +6931,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq) bfqq_already_existing = true; if (!bfqq_already_existing) { - bfqq->waker_bfqq = old_bfqq->waker_bfqq; + bfqq->waker_bfqq = waker_bfqq; bfqq->tentative_waker_bfqq = NULL; /* @@ -6916,7 +6941,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq) * woken_list of the waker. See * bfq_check_waker for details. */ - if (bfqq->waker_bfqq) + if (waker_bfqq) hlist_add_head(&bfqq->woken_list_node, &bfqq->waker_bfqq->woken_list); }

2 weeks, 3 days

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block, bfq: fix uaf for accessing waker_bfqq after splitting" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 1ba0403ac6447f2d63914fb760c44a3b19c44eaf # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100221-pang-residue-68ad@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 1ba0403ac644 ("block, bfq: fix uaf for accessing waker_bfqq after splitting") fd571df0ac5b ("block, bfq: turn bfqq_data into an array in bfq_io_cq") a61230470c8c ("block, bfq: move io_cq-persistent bfqq data into a dedicated struct") 9778369a2d6c ("block, bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis") 246cf66e300b ("block, bfq: fix uaf for bfqq in bfq_exit_icq_bfqq") 337366e02b37 ("block, bfq: replace 0/1 with false/true in bic apis") 64dc8c732f5c ("block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'") a1795c2ccb1e ("bfq: fix waker_bfqq inconsistency crash") dc469ba2e790 ("block/bfq: Use the new blk_opf_t type") f950667356ce ("bfq: Relax waker detection for shared queues") 4e54a2493e58 ("bfq: Get rid of __bio_blkcg() usage") 09f871868080 ("bfq: Track whether bfq_group is still online") ea591cd4eb27 ("bfq: Update cgroup information before merging bio") 3bc5e683c67d ("bfq: Split shared queues on move between cgroups") 70456e5210f4 ("bfq: Avoid false marking of bic as stably merged") f6bad159f5d5 ("block/bfq-iosched.c: use "false" rather than "BLK_RW_ASYNC"") a0725c22cd84 ("bfq: use bfq_bic_lookup in bfq_limit_depth") 1f18b7005b49 ("bfq: Limit waker detection in time") 76f1df88bbc2 ("bfq: Limit number of requests consumed by each cgroup") 44dfa279f117 ("bfq: Store full bitmap depth in bfq_data") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 1ba0403ac6447f2d63914fb760c44a3b19c44eaf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 21:41:48 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] block, bfq: fix uaf for accessing waker_bfqq after splitting After commit 42c306ed7233 ("block, bfq: don't break merge chain in bfq_split_bfqq()"), if the current procress is the last holder of bfqq, the bfqq can be freed after bfq_split_bfqq(). Hence recored the bfqq and then access bfqq->waker_bfqq may trigger UAF. What's more, the waker_bfqq may in the merge chain of bfqq, hence just recored waker_bfqq is still not safe. Fix the problem by adding a helper bfq_waker_bfqq() to check if bfqq->waker_bfqq is in the merge chain, and current procress is the only holder. Fixes: 42c306ed7233 ("block, bfq: don't break merge chain in bfq_split_bfqq()") Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240909134154.954924-2-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index d1bf2b8a3576..d5d39974c674 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -6825,6 +6825,31 @@ static void bfq_prepare_request(struct request *rq) rq->elv.priv[0] = rq->elv.priv[1] = NULL; } +static struct bfq_queue *bfq_waker_bfqq(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) +{ + struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq = bfqq->new_bfqq; + struct bfq_queue *waker_bfqq = bfqq->waker_bfqq; + + if (!waker_bfqq) + return NULL; + + while (new_bfqq) { + if (new_bfqq == waker_bfqq) { + /* + * If waker_bfqq is in the merge chain, and current + * is the only procress. + */ + if (bfqq_process_refs(waker_bfqq) == 1) + return NULL; + break; + } + + new_bfqq = new_bfqq->new_bfqq; + } + + return waker_bfqq; +} + /* * If needed, init rq, allocate bfq data structures associated with * rq, and increment reference counters in the destination bfq_queue @@ -6886,7 +6911,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq) /* If the queue was seeky for too long, break it apart. */ if (bfq_bfqq_coop(bfqq) && bfq_bfqq_split_coop(bfqq) && !bic->bfqq_data[a_idx].stably_merged) { - struct bfq_queue *old_bfqq = bfqq; + struct bfq_queue *waker_bfqq = bfq_waker_bfqq(bfqq); /* Update bic before losing reference to bfqq */ if (bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq)) @@ -6906,7 +6931,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq) bfqq_already_existing = true; if (!bfqq_already_existing) { - bfqq->waker_bfqq = old_bfqq->waker_bfqq; + bfqq->waker_bfqq = waker_bfqq; bfqq->tentative_waker_bfqq = NULL; /* @@ -6916,7 +6941,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq) * woken_list of the waker. See * bfq_check_waker for details. */ - if (bfqq->waker_bfqq) + if (waker_bfqq) hlist_add_head(&bfqq->woken_list_node, &bfqq->waker_bfqq->woken_list); }

2 weeks, 3 days

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block, bfq: fix uaf for accessing waker_bfqq after splitting" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 1ba0403ac6447f2d63914fb760c44a3b19c44eaf # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100220-swagger-freehand-6d91@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 1ba0403ac644 ("block, bfq: fix uaf for accessing waker_bfqq after splitting") fd571df0ac5b ("block, bfq: turn bfqq_data into an array in bfq_io_cq") a61230470c8c ("block, bfq: move io_cq-persistent bfqq data into a dedicated struct") 9778369a2d6c ("block, bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis") 246cf66e300b ("block, bfq: fix uaf for bfqq in bfq_exit_icq_bfqq") 337366e02b37 ("block, bfq: replace 0/1 with false/true in bic apis") 64dc8c732f5c ("block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'") a1795c2ccb1e ("bfq: fix waker_bfqq inconsistency crash") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 1ba0403ac6447f2d63914fb760c44a3b19c44eaf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 21:41:48 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] block, bfq: fix uaf for accessing waker_bfqq after splitting After commit 42c306ed7233 ("block, bfq: don't break merge chain in bfq_split_bfqq()"), if the current procress is the last holder of bfqq, the bfqq can be freed after bfq_split_bfqq(). Hence recored the bfqq and then access bfqq->waker_bfqq may trigger UAF. What's more, the waker_bfqq may in the merge chain of bfqq, hence just recored waker_bfqq is still not safe. Fix the problem by adding a helper bfq_waker_bfqq() to check if bfqq->waker_bfqq is in the merge chain, and current procress is the only holder. Fixes: 42c306ed7233 ("block, bfq: don't break merge chain in bfq_split_bfqq()") Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240909134154.954924-2-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index d1bf2b8a3576..d5d39974c674 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -6825,6 +6825,31 @@ static void bfq_prepare_request(struct request *rq) rq->elv.priv[0] = rq->elv.priv[1] = NULL; } +static struct bfq_queue *bfq_waker_bfqq(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) +{ + struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq = bfqq->new_bfqq; + struct bfq_queue *waker_bfqq = bfqq->waker_bfqq; + + if (!waker_bfqq) + return NULL; + + while (new_bfqq) { + if (new_bfqq == waker_bfqq) { + /* + * If waker_bfqq is in the merge chain, and current + * is the only procress. + */ + if (bfqq_process_refs(waker_bfqq) == 1) + return NULL; + break; + } + + new_bfqq = new_bfqq->new_bfqq; + } + + return waker_bfqq; +} + /* * If needed, init rq, allocate bfq data structures associated with * rq, and increment reference counters in the destination bfq_queue @@ -6886,7 +6911,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq) /* If the queue was seeky for too long, break it apart. */ if (bfq_bfqq_coop(bfqq) && bfq_bfqq_split_coop(bfqq) && !bic->bfqq_data[a_idx].stably_merged) { - struct bfq_queue *old_bfqq = bfqq; + struct bfq_queue *waker_bfqq = bfq_waker_bfqq(bfqq); /* Update bic before losing reference to bfqq */ if (bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq)) @@ -6906,7 +6931,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq) bfqq_already_existing = true; if (!bfqq_already_existing) { - bfqq->waker_bfqq = old_bfqq->waker_bfqq; + bfqq->waker_bfqq = waker_bfqq; bfqq->tentative_waker_bfqq = NULL; /* @@ -6916,7 +6941,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq) * woken_list of the waker. See * bfq_check_waker for details. */ - if (bfqq->waker_bfqq) + if (waker_bfqq) hlist_add_head(&bfqq->woken_list_node, &bfqq->waker_bfqq->woken_list); }

2 weeks, 3 days

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] bpf: Fix use-after-free in bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach()" failed to apply to 6.11-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.11-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.11.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 5fe6e308abaea082c20fbf2aa5df8e14495622cf # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100247-spray-enjoyable-b1d0@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.11.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 5fe6e308abae ("bpf: Fix use-after-free in bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach()") 3c83a9ad0295 ("uprobes: make uprobe_register() return struct uprobe *") e04332ebc8ac ("uprobes: kill uprobe_register_refctr()") db61e6a4eee5 ("selftests/bpf: fix uprobe.path leak in bpf_testmod") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 5fe6e308abaea082c20fbf2aa5df8e14495622cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg(a)redhat.com> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 17:25:24 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Fix use-after-free in bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach() If bpf_link_prime() fails, bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach() goes to the error_free label and frees the array of bpf_uprobe's without calling bpf_uprobe_unregister(). This leaks bpf_uprobe->uprobe and worse, this frees bpf_uprobe->consumer without removing it from the uprobe->consumers list. Fixes: 89ae89f53d20 ("bpf: Add multi uprobe link") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000382d39061f59f2dd@google.com/ Reported-by: syzbot+f7a1c2c2711e4a780f19(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg(a)redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz(a)infradead.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii(a)kernel.org> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa(a)kernel.org> Tested-by: syzbot+f7a1c2c2711e4a780f19(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813152524.GA7292@redhat.com diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c index 4e391daafa64..90cd30e9723e 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c @@ -3484,17 +3484,20 @@ int bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr &uprobes[i].consumer); if (IS_ERR(uprobes[i].uprobe)) { err = PTR_ERR(uprobes[i].uprobe); - bpf_uprobe_unregister(uprobes, i); - goto error_free; + link->cnt = i; + goto error_unregister; } } err = bpf_link_prime(&link->link, &link_primer); if (err) - goto error_free; + goto error_unregister; return bpf_link_settle(&link_primer); +error_unregister: + bpf_uprobe_unregister(uprobes, link->cnt); + error_free: kvfree(uprobes); kfree(link);

2 weeks, 3 days

3
2
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dm-verity: restart or panic on an I/O error" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-4.19.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x e6a3531dd542cb127c8de32ab1e54a48ae19962b # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100250-mortuary-cogwheel-4144@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 4.19.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: e6a3531dd542 ("dm-verity: restart or panic on an I/O error") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From e6a3531dd542cb127c8de32ab1e54a48ae19962b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka(a)redhat.com> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 15:18:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] dm-verity: restart or panic on an I/O error Maxim Suhanov reported that dm-verity doesn't crash if an I/O error happens. In theory, this could be used to subvert security, because an attacker can create sectors that return error with the Write Uncorrectable command. Some programs may misbehave if they have to deal with EIO. This commit fixes dm-verity, so that if "panic_on_corruption" or "restart_on_corruption" was specified and an I/O error happens, the machine will panic or restart. This commit also changes kernel_restart to emergency_restart - kernel_restart calls reboot notifiers and these reboot notifiers may wait for the bio that failed. emergency_restart doesn't call the notifiers. Reported-by: Maxim Suhanov <dfirblog(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka(a)redhat.com> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c index cf659c8feb29..a95c1b9cc5b5 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c @@ -272,8 +272,10 @@ static int verity_handle_err(struct dm_verity *v, enum verity_block_type type, if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_LOGGING) return 0; - if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_RESTART) - kernel_restart("dm-verity device corrupted"); + if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_RESTART) { + pr_emerg("dm-verity device corrupted\n"); + emergency_restart(); + } if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_PANIC) panic("dm-verity device corrupted"); @@ -596,6 +598,23 @@ static void verity_finish_io(struct dm_verity_io *io, blk_status_t status) if (!static_branch_unlikely(&use_bh_wq_enabled) || !io->in_bh) verity_fec_finish_io(io); + if (unlikely(status != BLK_STS_OK) && + unlikely(!(bio->bi_opf & REQ_RAHEAD)) && + !verity_is_system_shutting_down()) { + if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_RESTART || + v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_PANIC) + DMERR_LIMIT("%s has error: %s", v->data_dev->name, + blk_status_to_str(status)); + + if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_RESTART) { + pr_emerg("dm-verity device corrupted\n"); + emergency_restart(); + } + + if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_PANIC) + panic("dm-verity device corrupted"); + } + bio_endio(bio); }

2 weeks, 3 days

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dm-verity: restart or panic on an I/O error" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x e6a3531dd542cb127c8de32ab1e54a48ae19962b # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100249-snorkel-jockey-0dd7@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: e6a3531dd542 ("dm-verity: restart or panic on an I/O error") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From e6a3531dd542cb127c8de32ab1e54a48ae19962b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka(a)redhat.com> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 15:18:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] dm-verity: restart or panic on an I/O error Maxim Suhanov reported that dm-verity doesn't crash if an I/O error happens. In theory, this could be used to subvert security, because an attacker can create sectors that return error with the Write Uncorrectable command. Some programs may misbehave if they have to deal with EIO. This commit fixes dm-verity, so that if "panic_on_corruption" or "restart_on_corruption" was specified and an I/O error happens, the machine will panic or restart. This commit also changes kernel_restart to emergency_restart - kernel_restart calls reboot notifiers and these reboot notifiers may wait for the bio that failed. emergency_restart doesn't call the notifiers. Reported-by: Maxim Suhanov <dfirblog(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka(a)redhat.com> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c index cf659c8feb29..a95c1b9cc5b5 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c @@ -272,8 +272,10 @@ static int verity_handle_err(struct dm_verity *v, enum verity_block_type type, if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_LOGGING) return 0; - if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_RESTART) - kernel_restart("dm-verity device corrupted"); + if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_RESTART) { + pr_emerg("dm-verity device corrupted\n"); + emergency_restart(); + } if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_PANIC) panic("dm-verity device corrupted"); @@ -596,6 +598,23 @@ static void verity_finish_io(struct dm_verity_io *io, blk_status_t status) if (!static_branch_unlikely(&use_bh_wq_enabled) || !io->in_bh) verity_fec_finish_io(io); + if (unlikely(status != BLK_STS_OK) && + unlikely(!(bio->bi_opf & REQ_RAHEAD)) && + !verity_is_system_shutting_down()) { + if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_RESTART || + v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_PANIC) + DMERR_LIMIT("%s has error: %s", v->data_dev->name, + blk_status_to_str(status)); + + if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_RESTART) { + pr_emerg("dm-verity device corrupted\n"); + emergency_restart(); + } + + if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_PANIC) + panic("dm-verity device corrupted"); + } + bio_endio(bio); }

2 weeks, 3 days

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dm-verity: restart or panic on an I/O error" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x e6a3531dd542cb127c8de32ab1e54a48ae19962b # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100248-blitz-lapdog-06dc@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: e6a3531dd542 ("dm-verity: restart or panic on an I/O error") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From e6a3531dd542cb127c8de32ab1e54a48ae19962b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka(a)redhat.com> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 15:18:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] dm-verity: restart or panic on an I/O error Maxim Suhanov reported that dm-verity doesn't crash if an I/O error happens. In theory, this could be used to subvert security, because an attacker can create sectors that return error with the Write Uncorrectable command. Some programs may misbehave if they have to deal with EIO. This commit fixes dm-verity, so that if "panic_on_corruption" or "restart_on_corruption" was specified and an I/O error happens, the machine will panic or restart. This commit also changes kernel_restart to emergency_restart - kernel_restart calls reboot notifiers and these reboot notifiers may wait for the bio that failed. emergency_restart doesn't call the notifiers. Reported-by: Maxim Suhanov <dfirblog(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka(a)redhat.com> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c index cf659c8feb29..a95c1b9cc5b5 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c @@ -272,8 +272,10 @@ static int verity_handle_err(struct dm_verity *v, enum verity_block_type type, if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_LOGGING) return 0; - if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_RESTART) - kernel_restart("dm-verity device corrupted"); + if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_RESTART) { + pr_emerg("dm-verity device corrupted\n"); + emergency_restart(); + } if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_PANIC) panic("dm-verity device corrupted"); @@ -596,6 +598,23 @@ static void verity_finish_io(struct dm_verity_io *io, blk_status_t status) if (!static_branch_unlikely(&use_bh_wq_enabled) || !io->in_bh) verity_fec_finish_io(io); + if (unlikely(status != BLK_STS_OK) && + unlikely(!(bio->bi_opf & REQ_RAHEAD)) && + !verity_is_system_shutting_down()) { + if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_RESTART || + v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_PANIC) + DMERR_LIMIT("%s has error: %s", v->data_dev->name, + blk_status_to_str(status)); + + if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_RESTART) { + pr_emerg("dm-verity device corrupted\n"); + emergency_restart(); + } + + if (v->mode == DM_VERITY_MODE_PANIC) + panic("dm-verity device corrupted"); + } + bio_endio(bio); }

2 weeks, 3 days

1
0
0 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror October 2024