October 2024 - Linux-stable-mirror

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: marvell: cn9130-sr-som: fix cp0 mdio0 mdio pin numbers

by kernel test robot

Hi, Thanks for your patch. FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied. The check is based on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html#opt… Rule: add the tag "Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org" in the sign-off area to have the patch automatically included in the stable tree. Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: marvell: cn9130-sr-som: fix cp0 mdio0 mdio pin numbers Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20241002-cn9130-som-mdio-v1-1-0942be4dc550%4… -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

2 weeks, 3 days

1
0
0 0

Stable request: wifi: mt76: do not run mt76_unregister_device() on unregistered hw

by Georg Müller

commit 41130c32f3a18fcc930316da17f3a5f3bc326aa1 upstream This was not marked as stable (but has a Fixes: tag), but causes the USB stack to crash with 6.1.x kernels. The patch does not apply when cherry-picking because of the context. Should I send the patch again with updated context so that it applies without conflicts? Best regards, Georg

2 weeks, 3 days

2
5
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/tdx: Fix "in-kernel MMIO" check" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x d4fc4d01471528da8a9797a065982e05090e1d81 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100100-emperor-thespian-397f@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: d4fc4d014715 ("x86/tdx: Fix "in-kernel MMIO" check") 859e63b789d6 ("x86/tdx: Convert shared memory back to private on kexec") 533c67e63584 ("mm/mglru: add dummy pmd_dirty()") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From d4fc4d01471528da8a9797a065982e05090e1d81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Alexey Gladkov (Intel)" <legion(a)kernel.org> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 19:05:56 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] x86/tdx: Fix "in-kernel MMIO" check TDX only supports kernel-initiated MMIO operations. The handle_mmio() function checks if the #VE exception occurred in the kernel and rejects the operation if it did not. However, userspace can deceive the kernel into performing MMIO on its behalf. For example, if userspace can point a syscall to an MMIO address, syscall does get_user() or put_user() on it, triggering MMIO #VE. The kernel will treat the #VE as in-kernel MMIO. Ensure that the target MMIO address is within the kernel before decoding instruction. Fixes: 31d58c4e557d ("x86/tdx: Handle in-kernel MMIO") Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov (Intel) <legion(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen(a)linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov(a)linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen(a)linux.intel.com> Cc:stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/565a804b80387970460a4ebc67c88d1380f61ad1.172623… diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c index da8b66dce0da..327c45c5013f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c +++ b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include <asm/insn-eval.h> #include <asm/pgtable.h> #include <asm/set_memory.h> +#include <asm/traps.h> /* MMIO direction */ #define EPT_READ 0 @@ -433,6 +434,11 @@ static int handle_mmio(struct pt_regs *regs, struct ve_info *ve) return -EINVAL; } + if (!fault_in_kernel_space(ve->gla)) { + WARN_ONCE(1, "Access to userspace address is not supported"); + return -EINVAL; + } + /* * Reject EPT violation #VEs that split pages. *

2 weeks, 3 days

3
2
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/tdx: Fix "in-kernel MMIO" check" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x d4fc4d01471528da8a9797a065982e05090e1d81 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100104-everybody-retrace-89ed@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: d4fc4d014715 ("x86/tdx: Fix "in-kernel MMIO" check") 859e63b789d6 ("x86/tdx: Convert shared memory back to private on kexec") 533c67e63584 ("mm/mglru: add dummy pmd_dirty()") df57721f9a63 ("Merge tag 'x86_shstk_for_6.6-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From d4fc4d01471528da8a9797a065982e05090e1d81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Alexey Gladkov (Intel)" <legion(a)kernel.org> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 19:05:56 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] x86/tdx: Fix "in-kernel MMIO" check TDX only supports kernel-initiated MMIO operations. The handle_mmio() function checks if the #VE exception occurred in the kernel and rejects the operation if it did not. However, userspace can deceive the kernel into performing MMIO on its behalf. For example, if userspace can point a syscall to an MMIO address, syscall does get_user() or put_user() on it, triggering MMIO #VE. The kernel will treat the #VE as in-kernel MMIO. Ensure that the target MMIO address is within the kernel before decoding instruction. Fixes: 31d58c4e557d ("x86/tdx: Handle in-kernel MMIO") Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov (Intel) <legion(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen(a)linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov(a)linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen(a)linux.intel.com> Cc:stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/565a804b80387970460a4ebc67c88d1380f61ad1.172623… diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c index da8b66dce0da..327c45c5013f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c +++ b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include <asm/insn-eval.h> #include <asm/pgtable.h> #include <asm/set_memory.h> +#include <asm/traps.h> /* MMIO direction */ #define EPT_READ 0 @@ -433,6 +434,11 @@ static int handle_mmio(struct pt_regs *regs, struct ve_info *ve) return -EINVAL; } + if (!fault_in_kernel_space(ve->gla)) { + WARN_ONCE(1, "Access to userspace address is not supported"); + return -EINVAL; + } + /* * Reject EPT violation #VEs that split pages. *

2 weeks, 3 days

2
1
0 0

[PATCH v4 02/11] PM: domains: Fix alloc/free in dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list()

by Ulf Hansson

The dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list() functions are not resource managed, hence they should not use devm_* helpers to manage allocation/freeing of data. Let's fix this by converting to the traditional alloc/free functions. Fixes: 161e16a5e50a ("PM: domains: Add helper functions to attach/detach multiple PM domains") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson(a)linaro.org> --- Changes in v4: - New patch. --- drivers/base/power/common.c | 25 +++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/base/power/common.c b/drivers/base/power/common.c index 8c34ae1cd8d5..cca2fd0a1aed 100644 --- a/drivers/base/power/common.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/common.c @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ int dev_pm_domain_attach_list(struct device *dev, struct device *pd_dev = NULL; int ret, i, num_pds = 0; bool by_id = true; + size_t size; u32 pd_flags = data ? data->pd_flags : 0; u32 link_flags = pd_flags & PD_FLAG_NO_DEV_LINK ? 0 : DL_FLAG_STATELESS | DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME; @@ -217,19 +218,17 @@ int dev_pm_domain_attach_list(struct device *dev, if (num_pds <= 0) return 0; - pds = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pds), GFP_KERNEL); + pds = kzalloc(sizeof(*pds), GFP_KERNEL); if (!pds) return -ENOMEM; - pds->pd_devs = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_pds, sizeof(*pds->pd_devs), - GFP_KERNEL); - if (!pds->pd_devs) - return -ENOMEM; - - pds->pd_links = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_pds, sizeof(*pds->pd_links), - GFP_KERNEL); - if (!pds->pd_links) - return -ENOMEM; + size = sizeof(*pds->pd_devs) + sizeof(*pds->pd_links); + pds->pd_devs = kcalloc(num_pds, size, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!pds->pd_devs) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto free_pds; + } + pds->pd_links = (void *)(pds->pd_devs + num_pds); if (link_flags && pd_flags & PD_FLAG_DEV_LINK_ON) link_flags |= DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE; @@ -272,6 +271,9 @@ int dev_pm_domain_attach_list(struct device *dev, device_link_del(pds->pd_links[i]); dev_pm_domain_detach(pds->pd_devs[i], true); } + kfree(pds->pd_devs); +free_pds: + kfree(pds); return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_domain_attach_list); @@ -363,6 +365,9 @@ void dev_pm_domain_detach_list(struct dev_pm_domain_list *list) device_link_del(list->pd_links[i]); dev_pm_domain_detach(list->pd_devs[i], true); } + + kfree(list->pd_devs); + kfree(list); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_domain_detach_list); -- 2.34.1

2 weeks, 3 days

1
0
0 0

[PATCH] serial: imx: Update mctrl old_status on RTSD interrupt

by Marek Vasut

When sending data using DMA at high baudrate (4 Mbdps in local test case) to a device with small RX buffer which keeps asserting RTS after every received byte, it is possible that the iMX UART driver would not recognize the falling edge of RTS input signal and get stuck, unable to transmit any more data. This condition happens when the following sequence of events occur: - imx_uart_mctrl_check() is called at some point and takes a snapshot of UART control signal status into sport->old_status using imx_uart_get_hwmctrl(). The RTSS/TIOCM_CTS bit is of interest here (*). - DMA transfer occurs, the remote device asserts RTS signal after each byte. The i.MX UART driver recognizes each such RTS signal change, raises an interrupt with USR1 register RTSD bit set, which leads to invocation of __imx_uart_rtsint(), which calls uart_handle_cts_change(). - If the RTS signal is deasserted, uart_handle_cts_change() clears port->hw_stopped and unblocks the port for further data transfers. - If the RTS is asserted, uart_handle_cts_change() sets port->hw_stopped and blocks the port for further data transfers. This may occur as the last interrupt of a transfer, which means port->hw_stopped remains set and the port remains blocked (**). - Any further data transfer attempts will trigger imx_uart_mctrl_check(), which will read current status of UART control signals by calling imx_uart_get_hwmctrl() (***) and compare it with sport->old_status . - If current status differs from sport->old_status for RTS signal, uart_handle_cts_change() is called and possibly unblocks the port by clearing port->hw_stopped . - If current status does not differ from sport->old_status for RTS signal, no action occurs. This may occur in case prior snapshot (*) was taken before any transfer so the RTS is deasserted, current snapshot (***) was taken after a transfer and therefore RTS is deasserted again, which means current status and sport->old_status are identical. In case (**) triggered when RTS got asserted, and made port->hw_stopped set, the port->hw_stopped will remain set because no change on RTS line is recognized by this driver and uart_handle_cts_change() is not called from here to unblock the port->hw_stopped. Update sport->old_status in __imx_uart_rtsint() accordingly to make imx_uart_mctrl_check() detect such RTS change. Note that TIOCM_CAR and TIOCM_RI bits in sport->old_status do not suffer from this problem. Fixes: ceca629e0b48 ("[ARM] 2971/1: i.MX uart handle rts irq") Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex(a)denx.de> --- Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig(a)pengutronix.de> Cc: Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier(a)dh-electronics.com> Cc: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet(a)wanadoo.fr> Cc: Esben Haabendal <esben(a)geanix.com> Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam(a)gmail.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby(a)kernel.org> Cc: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo(a)kunbus.com> Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel(a)pengutronix.de> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux(a)rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Rickard x Andersson <rickaran(a)axis.com> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer(a)pengutronix.de> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo(a)kernel.org> Cc: Stefan Eichenberger <stefan.eichenberger(a)toradex.com> Cc: imx(a)lists.linux.dev Cc: linux-arm-kernel(a)lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-serial(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org --- drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c index 67d4a72eda770..3ad7f42790ef9 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c @@ -762,6 +762,10 @@ static irqreturn_t __imx_uart_rtsint(int irq, void *dev_id) imx_uart_writel(sport, USR1_RTSD, USR1); usr1 = imx_uart_readl(sport, USR1) & USR1_RTSS; + if (usr1 & USR1_RTSS) + sport->old_status |= TIOCM_CTS; + else + sport->old_status &= ~TIOCM_CTS; uart_handle_cts_change(&sport->port, usr1); wake_up_interruptible(&sport->port.state->port.delta_msr_wait); -- 2.45.2

2 weeks, 3 days

3
3
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block, bfq: fix procress reference leakage for bfqq in merge" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-4.19.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 73aeab373557fa6ee4ae0b742c6211ccd9859280 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100234-dizzy-backlands-30eb@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 4.19.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 73aeab373557 ("block, bfq: fix procress reference leakage for bfqq in merge chain") 9778369a2d6c ("block, bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis") 246cf66e300b ("block, bfq: fix uaf for bfqq in bfq_exit_icq_bfqq") 337366e02b37 ("block, bfq: replace 0/1 with false/true in bic apis") 64dc8c732f5c ("block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'") dc469ba2e790 ("block/bfq: Use the new blk_opf_t type") 4e54a2493e58 ("bfq: Get rid of __bio_blkcg() usage") 09f871868080 ("bfq: Track whether bfq_group is still online") ea591cd4eb27 ("bfq: Update cgroup information before merging bio") 3bc5e683c67d ("bfq: Split shared queues on move between cgroups") f6bad159f5d5 ("block/bfq-iosched.c: use "false" rather than "BLK_RW_ASYNC"") a0725c22cd84 ("bfq: use bfq_bic_lookup in bfq_limit_depth") 1f18b7005b49 ("bfq: Limit waker detection in time") 76f1df88bbc2 ("bfq: Limit number of requests consumed by each cgroup") 44dfa279f117 ("bfq: Store full bitmap depth in bfq_data") ae0f1a732f4a ("blk-mq: Stop using pointers for blk_mq_tags bitmap tags") e155b0c238b2 ("blk-mq: Use shared tags for shared sbitmap support") 645db34e5050 ("blk-mq: Refactor and rename blk_mq_free_map_and_{requests->rqs}()") 63064be150e4 ("blk-mq: Add blk_mq_alloc_map_and_rqs()") a7e7388dced4 ("blk-mq: Add blk_mq_tag_update_sched_shared_sbitmap()") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 73aeab373557fa6ee4ae0b742c6211ccd9859280 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 21:41:49 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] block, bfq: fix procress reference leakage for bfqq in merge chain MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Original state: Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 Process 4 (BIC1) (BIC2) (BIC3) (BIC4) Λ | | | \--------------\ \-------------\ \-------------\| V V V bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4 ref 0 1 2 4 After commit 0e456dba86c7 ("block, bfq: choose the last bfqq from merge chain in bfq_setup_cooperator()"), if P1 issues a new IO: Without the patch: Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 Process 4 (BIC1) (BIC2) (BIC3) (BIC4) Λ | | | \------------------------------\ \-------------\| V V bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4 ref 0 0 2 4 bfqq3 will be used to handle IO from P1, this is not expected, IO should be redirected to bfqq4; With the patch: ------------------------------------------- | | Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 | Process 4 (BIC1) (BIC2) (BIC3) | (BIC4) | | | | \-------------\ \-------------\| V V bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4 ref 0 0 2 4 IO is redirected to bfqq4, however, procress reference of bfqq3 is still 2, while there is only P2 using it. Fix the problem by calling bfq_merge_bfqqs() for each bfqq in the merge chain. Also change bfqq_merge_bfqqs() to return new_bfqq to simplify code. Fixes: 0e456dba86c7 ("block, bfq: choose the last bfqq from merge chain in bfq_setup_cooperator()") Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240909134154.954924-3-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index d5d39974c674..f4192d5411d2 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -3129,10 +3129,12 @@ void bfq_release_process_ref(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq) bfq_put_queue(bfqq); } -static void -bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_io_cq *bic, - struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq) +static struct bfq_queue *bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, + struct bfq_io_cq *bic, + struct bfq_queue *bfqq) { + struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq = bfqq->new_bfqq; + bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd, bfqq, "merging with queue %lu", (unsigned long)new_bfqq->pid); /* Save weight raising and idle window of the merged queues */ @@ -3226,6 +3228,8 @@ bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bfq_reassign_last_bfqq(bfqq, new_bfqq); bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, bfqq); + + return new_bfqq; } static bool bfq_allow_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, @@ -3261,14 +3265,8 @@ static bool bfq_allow_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, * fulfilled, i.e., bic can be redirected to new_bfqq * and bfqq can be put. */ - bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bfqd->bio_bic, bfqq, - new_bfqq); - /* - * If we get here, bio will be queued into new_queue, - * so use new_bfqq to decide whether bio and rq can be - * merged. - */ - bfqq = new_bfqq; + while (bfqq != new_bfqq) + bfqq = bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bfqd->bio_bic, bfqq); /* * Change also bqfd->bio_bfqq, as @@ -5705,9 +5703,7 @@ bfq_do_early_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, * state before killing it. */ bfqq->bic = bic; - bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bic, bfqq, new_bfqq); - - return new_bfqq; + return bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bic, bfqq); } /* @@ -6162,6 +6158,7 @@ static bool __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct request *rq) bool waiting, idle_timer_disabled = false; if (new_bfqq) { + struct bfq_queue *old_bfqq = bfqq; /* * Release the request's reference to the old bfqq * and make sure one is taken to the shared queue. @@ -6178,18 +6175,18 @@ static bool __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct request *rq) * new_bfqq. */ if (bic_to_bfqq(RQ_BIC(rq), true, - bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, rq->bio)) == bfqq) - bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, RQ_BIC(rq), - bfqq, new_bfqq); + bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, rq->bio)) == bfqq) { + while (bfqq != new_bfqq) + bfqq = bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, RQ_BIC(rq), bfqq); + } - bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(bfqq); + bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(old_bfqq); /* * rq is about to be enqueued into new_bfqq, * release rq reference on bfqq */ - bfq_put_queue(bfqq); + bfq_put_queue(old_bfqq); rq->elv.priv[1] = new_bfqq; - bfqq = new_bfqq; } bfq_update_io_thinktime(bfqd, bfqq);

2 weeks, 3 days

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block, bfq: fix procress reference leakage for bfqq in merge" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 73aeab373557fa6ee4ae0b742c6211ccd9859280 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100232-unheated-trailing-4528@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 73aeab373557 ("block, bfq: fix procress reference leakage for bfqq in merge chain") 9778369a2d6c ("block, bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis") 246cf66e300b ("block, bfq: fix uaf for bfqq in bfq_exit_icq_bfqq") 337366e02b37 ("block, bfq: replace 0/1 with false/true in bic apis") 64dc8c732f5c ("block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'") dc469ba2e790 ("block/bfq: Use the new blk_opf_t type") 4e54a2493e58 ("bfq: Get rid of __bio_blkcg() usage") 09f871868080 ("bfq: Track whether bfq_group is still online") ea591cd4eb27 ("bfq: Update cgroup information before merging bio") 3bc5e683c67d ("bfq: Split shared queues on move between cgroups") f6bad159f5d5 ("block/bfq-iosched.c: use "false" rather than "BLK_RW_ASYNC"") a0725c22cd84 ("bfq: use bfq_bic_lookup in bfq_limit_depth") 1f18b7005b49 ("bfq: Limit waker detection in time") 76f1df88bbc2 ("bfq: Limit number of requests consumed by each cgroup") 44dfa279f117 ("bfq: Store full bitmap depth in bfq_data") ae0f1a732f4a ("blk-mq: Stop using pointers for blk_mq_tags bitmap tags") e155b0c238b2 ("blk-mq: Use shared tags for shared sbitmap support") 645db34e5050 ("blk-mq: Refactor and rename blk_mq_free_map_and_{requests->rqs}()") 63064be150e4 ("blk-mq: Add blk_mq_alloc_map_and_rqs()") a7e7388dced4 ("blk-mq: Add blk_mq_tag_update_sched_shared_sbitmap()") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 73aeab373557fa6ee4ae0b742c6211ccd9859280 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 21:41:49 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] block, bfq: fix procress reference leakage for bfqq in merge chain MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Original state: Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 Process 4 (BIC1) (BIC2) (BIC3) (BIC4) Λ | | | \--------------\ \-------------\ \-------------\| V V V bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4 ref 0 1 2 4 After commit 0e456dba86c7 ("block, bfq: choose the last bfqq from merge chain in bfq_setup_cooperator()"), if P1 issues a new IO: Without the patch: Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 Process 4 (BIC1) (BIC2) (BIC3) (BIC4) Λ | | | \------------------------------\ \-------------\| V V bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4 ref 0 0 2 4 bfqq3 will be used to handle IO from P1, this is not expected, IO should be redirected to bfqq4; With the patch: ------------------------------------------- | | Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 | Process 4 (BIC1) (BIC2) (BIC3) | (BIC4) | | | | \-------------\ \-------------\| V V bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4 ref 0 0 2 4 IO is redirected to bfqq4, however, procress reference of bfqq3 is still 2, while there is only P2 using it. Fix the problem by calling bfq_merge_bfqqs() for each bfqq in the merge chain. Also change bfqq_merge_bfqqs() to return new_bfqq to simplify code. Fixes: 0e456dba86c7 ("block, bfq: choose the last bfqq from merge chain in bfq_setup_cooperator()") Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240909134154.954924-3-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index d5d39974c674..f4192d5411d2 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -3129,10 +3129,12 @@ void bfq_release_process_ref(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq) bfq_put_queue(bfqq); } -static void -bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_io_cq *bic, - struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq) +static struct bfq_queue *bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, + struct bfq_io_cq *bic, + struct bfq_queue *bfqq) { + struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq = bfqq->new_bfqq; + bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd, bfqq, "merging with queue %lu", (unsigned long)new_bfqq->pid); /* Save weight raising and idle window of the merged queues */ @@ -3226,6 +3228,8 @@ bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bfq_reassign_last_bfqq(bfqq, new_bfqq); bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, bfqq); + + return new_bfqq; } static bool bfq_allow_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, @@ -3261,14 +3265,8 @@ static bool bfq_allow_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, * fulfilled, i.e., bic can be redirected to new_bfqq * and bfqq can be put. */ - bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bfqd->bio_bic, bfqq, - new_bfqq); - /* - * If we get here, bio will be queued into new_queue, - * so use new_bfqq to decide whether bio and rq can be - * merged. - */ - bfqq = new_bfqq; + while (bfqq != new_bfqq) + bfqq = bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bfqd->bio_bic, bfqq); /* * Change also bqfd->bio_bfqq, as @@ -5705,9 +5703,7 @@ bfq_do_early_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, * state before killing it. */ bfqq->bic = bic; - bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bic, bfqq, new_bfqq); - - return new_bfqq; + return bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bic, bfqq); } /* @@ -6162,6 +6158,7 @@ static bool __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct request *rq) bool waiting, idle_timer_disabled = false; if (new_bfqq) { + struct bfq_queue *old_bfqq = bfqq; /* * Release the request's reference to the old bfqq * and make sure one is taken to the shared queue. @@ -6178,18 +6175,18 @@ static bool __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct request *rq) * new_bfqq. */ if (bic_to_bfqq(RQ_BIC(rq), true, - bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, rq->bio)) == bfqq) - bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, RQ_BIC(rq), - bfqq, new_bfqq); + bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, rq->bio)) == bfqq) { + while (bfqq != new_bfqq) + bfqq = bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, RQ_BIC(rq), bfqq); + } - bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(bfqq); + bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(old_bfqq); /* * rq is about to be enqueued into new_bfqq, * release rq reference on bfqq */ - bfq_put_queue(bfqq); + bfq_put_queue(old_bfqq); rq->elv.priv[1] = new_bfqq; - bfqq = new_bfqq; } bfq_update_io_thinktime(bfqd, bfqq);

2 weeks, 3 days

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block, bfq: fix procress reference leakage for bfqq in merge" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 73aeab373557fa6ee4ae0b742c6211ccd9859280 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100231-difficult-nail-04b1@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 73aeab373557 ("block, bfq: fix procress reference leakage for bfqq in merge chain") 9778369a2d6c ("block, bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis") 246cf66e300b ("block, bfq: fix uaf for bfqq in bfq_exit_icq_bfqq") 337366e02b37 ("block, bfq: replace 0/1 with false/true in bic apis") 64dc8c732f5c ("block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'") dc469ba2e790 ("block/bfq: Use the new blk_opf_t type") 4e54a2493e58 ("bfq: Get rid of __bio_blkcg() usage") 09f871868080 ("bfq: Track whether bfq_group is still online") ea591cd4eb27 ("bfq: Update cgroup information before merging bio") 3bc5e683c67d ("bfq: Split shared queues on move between cgroups") f6bad159f5d5 ("block/bfq-iosched.c: use "false" rather than "BLK_RW_ASYNC"") a0725c22cd84 ("bfq: use bfq_bic_lookup in bfq_limit_depth") 1f18b7005b49 ("bfq: Limit waker detection in time") 76f1df88bbc2 ("bfq: Limit number of requests consumed by each cgroup") 44dfa279f117 ("bfq: Store full bitmap depth in bfq_data") ae0f1a732f4a ("blk-mq: Stop using pointers for blk_mq_tags bitmap tags") e155b0c238b2 ("blk-mq: Use shared tags for shared sbitmap support") 645db34e5050 ("blk-mq: Refactor and rename blk_mq_free_map_and_{requests->rqs}()") 63064be150e4 ("blk-mq: Add blk_mq_alloc_map_and_rqs()") a7e7388dced4 ("blk-mq: Add blk_mq_tag_update_sched_shared_sbitmap()") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 73aeab373557fa6ee4ae0b742c6211ccd9859280 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 21:41:49 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] block, bfq: fix procress reference leakage for bfqq in merge chain MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Original state: Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 Process 4 (BIC1) (BIC2) (BIC3) (BIC4) Λ | | | \--------------\ \-------------\ \-------------\| V V V bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4 ref 0 1 2 4 After commit 0e456dba86c7 ("block, bfq: choose the last bfqq from merge chain in bfq_setup_cooperator()"), if P1 issues a new IO: Without the patch: Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 Process 4 (BIC1) (BIC2) (BIC3) (BIC4) Λ | | | \------------------------------\ \-------------\| V V bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4 ref 0 0 2 4 bfqq3 will be used to handle IO from P1, this is not expected, IO should be redirected to bfqq4; With the patch: ------------------------------------------- | | Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 | Process 4 (BIC1) (BIC2) (BIC3) | (BIC4) | | | | \-------------\ \-------------\| V V bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4 ref 0 0 2 4 IO is redirected to bfqq4, however, procress reference of bfqq3 is still 2, while there is only P2 using it. Fix the problem by calling bfq_merge_bfqqs() for each bfqq in the merge chain. Also change bfqq_merge_bfqqs() to return new_bfqq to simplify code. Fixes: 0e456dba86c7 ("block, bfq: choose the last bfqq from merge chain in bfq_setup_cooperator()") Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240909134154.954924-3-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index d5d39974c674..f4192d5411d2 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -3129,10 +3129,12 @@ void bfq_release_process_ref(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq) bfq_put_queue(bfqq); } -static void -bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_io_cq *bic, - struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq) +static struct bfq_queue *bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, + struct bfq_io_cq *bic, + struct bfq_queue *bfqq) { + struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq = bfqq->new_bfqq; + bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd, bfqq, "merging with queue %lu", (unsigned long)new_bfqq->pid); /* Save weight raising and idle window of the merged queues */ @@ -3226,6 +3228,8 @@ bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bfq_reassign_last_bfqq(bfqq, new_bfqq); bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, bfqq); + + return new_bfqq; } static bool bfq_allow_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, @@ -3261,14 +3265,8 @@ static bool bfq_allow_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, * fulfilled, i.e., bic can be redirected to new_bfqq * and bfqq can be put. */ - bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bfqd->bio_bic, bfqq, - new_bfqq); - /* - * If we get here, bio will be queued into new_queue, - * so use new_bfqq to decide whether bio and rq can be - * merged. - */ - bfqq = new_bfqq; + while (bfqq != new_bfqq) + bfqq = bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bfqd->bio_bic, bfqq); /* * Change also bqfd->bio_bfqq, as @@ -5705,9 +5703,7 @@ bfq_do_early_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, * state before killing it. */ bfqq->bic = bic; - bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bic, bfqq, new_bfqq); - - return new_bfqq; + return bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bic, bfqq); } /* @@ -6162,6 +6158,7 @@ static bool __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct request *rq) bool waiting, idle_timer_disabled = false; if (new_bfqq) { + struct bfq_queue *old_bfqq = bfqq; /* * Release the request's reference to the old bfqq * and make sure one is taken to the shared queue. @@ -6178,18 +6175,18 @@ static bool __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct request *rq) * new_bfqq. */ if (bic_to_bfqq(RQ_BIC(rq), true, - bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, rq->bio)) == bfqq) - bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, RQ_BIC(rq), - bfqq, new_bfqq); + bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, rq->bio)) == bfqq) { + while (bfqq != new_bfqq) + bfqq = bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, RQ_BIC(rq), bfqq); + } - bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(bfqq); + bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(old_bfqq); /* * rq is about to be enqueued into new_bfqq, * release rq reference on bfqq */ - bfq_put_queue(bfqq); + bfq_put_queue(old_bfqq); rq->elv.priv[1] = new_bfqq; - bfqq = new_bfqq; } bfq_update_io_thinktime(bfqd, bfqq);

2 weeks, 3 days

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block, bfq: fix procress reference leakage for bfqq in merge" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 73aeab373557fa6ee4ae0b742c6211ccd9859280 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024100230-epilogue-hush-6a49@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 73aeab373557 ("block, bfq: fix procress reference leakage for bfqq in merge chain") 9778369a2d6c ("block, bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis") 246cf66e300b ("block, bfq: fix uaf for bfqq in bfq_exit_icq_bfqq") 337366e02b37 ("block, bfq: replace 0/1 with false/true in bic apis") 64dc8c732f5c ("block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'") dc469ba2e790 ("block/bfq: Use the new blk_opf_t type") 4e54a2493e58 ("bfq: Get rid of __bio_blkcg() usage") 09f871868080 ("bfq: Track whether bfq_group is still online") ea591cd4eb27 ("bfq: Update cgroup information before merging bio") 3bc5e683c67d ("bfq: Split shared queues on move between cgroups") f6bad159f5d5 ("block/bfq-iosched.c: use "false" rather than "BLK_RW_ASYNC"") a0725c22cd84 ("bfq: use bfq_bic_lookup in bfq_limit_depth") 1f18b7005b49 ("bfq: Limit waker detection in time") 76f1df88bbc2 ("bfq: Limit number of requests consumed by each cgroup") 44dfa279f117 ("bfq: Store full bitmap depth in bfq_data") ae0f1a732f4a ("blk-mq: Stop using pointers for blk_mq_tags bitmap tags") e155b0c238b2 ("blk-mq: Use shared tags for shared sbitmap support") 645db34e5050 ("blk-mq: Refactor and rename blk_mq_free_map_and_{requests->rqs}()") 63064be150e4 ("blk-mq: Add blk_mq_alloc_map_and_rqs()") a7e7388dced4 ("blk-mq: Add blk_mq_tag_update_sched_shared_sbitmap()") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 73aeab373557fa6ee4ae0b742c6211ccd9859280 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 21:41:49 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] block, bfq: fix procress reference leakage for bfqq in merge chain MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Original state: Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 Process 4 (BIC1) (BIC2) (BIC3) (BIC4) Λ | | | \--------------\ \-------------\ \-------------\| V V V bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4 ref 0 1 2 4 After commit 0e456dba86c7 ("block, bfq: choose the last bfqq from merge chain in bfq_setup_cooperator()"), if P1 issues a new IO: Without the patch: Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 Process 4 (BIC1) (BIC2) (BIC3) (BIC4) Λ | | | \------------------------------\ \-------------\| V V bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4 ref 0 0 2 4 bfqq3 will be used to handle IO from P1, this is not expected, IO should be redirected to bfqq4; With the patch: ------------------------------------------- | | Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 | Process 4 (BIC1) (BIC2) (BIC3) | (BIC4) | | | | \-------------\ \-------------\| V V bfqq1--------->bfqq2---------->bfqq3----------->bfqq4 ref 0 0 2 4 IO is redirected to bfqq4, however, procress reference of bfqq3 is still 2, while there is only P2 using it. Fix the problem by calling bfq_merge_bfqqs() for each bfqq in the merge chain. Also change bfqq_merge_bfqqs() to return new_bfqq to simplify code. Fixes: 0e456dba86c7 ("block, bfq: choose the last bfqq from merge chain in bfq_setup_cooperator()") Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240909134154.954924-3-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index d5d39974c674..f4192d5411d2 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -3129,10 +3129,12 @@ void bfq_release_process_ref(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq) bfq_put_queue(bfqq); } -static void -bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_io_cq *bic, - struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq) +static struct bfq_queue *bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, + struct bfq_io_cq *bic, + struct bfq_queue *bfqq) { + struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq = bfqq->new_bfqq; + bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd, bfqq, "merging with queue %lu", (unsigned long)new_bfqq->pid); /* Save weight raising and idle window of the merged queues */ @@ -3226,6 +3228,8 @@ bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bfq_reassign_last_bfqq(bfqq, new_bfqq); bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, bfqq); + + return new_bfqq; } static bool bfq_allow_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, @@ -3261,14 +3265,8 @@ static bool bfq_allow_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, * fulfilled, i.e., bic can be redirected to new_bfqq * and bfqq can be put. */ - bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bfqd->bio_bic, bfqq, - new_bfqq); - /* - * If we get here, bio will be queued into new_queue, - * so use new_bfqq to decide whether bio and rq can be - * merged. - */ - bfqq = new_bfqq; + while (bfqq != new_bfqq) + bfqq = bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bfqd->bio_bic, bfqq); /* * Change also bqfd->bio_bfqq, as @@ -5705,9 +5703,7 @@ bfq_do_early_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, * state before killing it. */ bfqq->bic = bic; - bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bic, bfqq, new_bfqq); - - return new_bfqq; + return bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bic, bfqq); } /* @@ -6162,6 +6158,7 @@ static bool __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct request *rq) bool waiting, idle_timer_disabled = false; if (new_bfqq) { + struct bfq_queue *old_bfqq = bfqq; /* * Release the request's reference to the old bfqq * and make sure one is taken to the shared queue. @@ -6178,18 +6175,18 @@ static bool __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct request *rq) * new_bfqq. */ if (bic_to_bfqq(RQ_BIC(rq), true, - bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, rq->bio)) == bfqq) - bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, RQ_BIC(rq), - bfqq, new_bfqq); + bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, rq->bio)) == bfqq) { + while (bfqq != new_bfqq) + bfqq = bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, RQ_BIC(rq), bfqq); + } - bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(bfqq); + bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(old_bfqq); /* * rq is about to be enqueued into new_bfqq, * release rq reference on bfqq */ - bfq_put_queue(bfqq); + bfq_put_queue(old_bfqq); rq->elv.priv[1] = new_bfqq; - bfqq = new_bfqq; } bfq_update_io_thinktime(bfqd, bfqq);

2 weeks, 3 days

1
0
0 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror October 2024