October 2024 - Linux-stable-mirror

[PATCH v3] comedi: Flush partial mappings in error case

by Jann Horn

If some remap_pfn_range() calls succeeded before one failed, we still have buffer pages mapped into the userspace page tables when we drop the buffer reference with comedi_buf_map_put(bm). The userspace mappings are only cleaned up later in the mmap error path. Fix it by explicitly flushing all mappings in our VMA on the error path. See commit 79a61cc3fc04 ("mm: avoid leaving partial pfn mappings around in error case"). Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Fixes: ed9eccbe8970 ("Staging: add comedi core") Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> --- Note: compile-tested only; I don't actually have comedi hardware, and I don't know anything about comedi. --- Changes in v3: - gate zapping ptes on CONFIG_MMU (Intel kernel test robot) - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241015-comedi-tlb-v2-1-cafb0e27dd9a@google.com Changes in v2: - only do the zapping in the pfnmap path (Ian Abbott) - use zap_vma_ptes() instead of zap_page_range_single() (Ian Abbott) - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241014-comedi-tlb-v1-1-4b699144b438@google.com --- drivers/comedi/comedi_fops.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/comedi/comedi_fops.c b/drivers/comedi/comedi_fops.c index 1b481731df96..b9df9b19d4bd 100644 --- a/drivers/comedi/comedi_fops.c +++ b/drivers/comedi/comedi_fops.c @@ -2407,6 +2407,18 @@ static int comedi_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma) start += PAGE_SIZE; } + +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU + /* + * Leaving behind a partial mapping of a buffer we're about to + * drop is unsafe, see remap_pfn_range_notrack(). + * We need to zap the range here ourselves instead of relying + * on the automatic zapping in remap_pfn_range() because we call + * remap_pfn_range() in a loop. + */ + if (retval) + zap_vma_ptes(vma, vma->vm_start, size); +#endif } if (retval == 0) { --- base-commit: 6485cf5ea253d40d507cd71253c9568c5470cd27 change-id: 20241014-comedi-tlb-400246505961 -- Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com>

8 months, 2 weeks

2
2
0 0

[PATCH RESEND] vdpa: solidrun: Fix UB bug with devres

by Philipp Stanner

In psnet_open_pf_bar() and snet_open_vf_bar() a string later passed to pcim_iomap_regions() is placed on the stack. Neither pcim_iomap_regions() nor the functions it calls copy that string. Should the string later ever be used, this, consequently, causes undefined behavior since the stack frame will by then have disappeared. Fix the bug by allocating the strings on the heap through devm_kasprintf(). Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # v6.3 Fixes: 51a8f9d7f587 ("virtio: vdpa: new SolidNET DPU driver.") Reported-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet(a)wanadoo.fr> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/74e9109a-ac59-49e2-9b1d-d825c9c9f891@wanadoo.fr/ Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner(a)redhat.com> --- drivers/vdpa/solidrun/snet_main.c | 14 ++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/solidrun/snet_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/solidrun/snet_main.c index 99428a04068d..c8b74980dbd1 100644 --- a/drivers/vdpa/solidrun/snet_main.c +++ b/drivers/vdpa/solidrun/snet_main.c @@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ static const struct vdpa_config_ops snet_config_ops = { static int psnet_open_pf_bar(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct psnet *psnet) { - char name[50]; + char *name; int ret, i, mask = 0; /* We don't know which BAR will be used to communicate.. * We will map every bar with len > 0. @@ -573,7 +573,10 @@ static int psnet_open_pf_bar(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct psnet *psnet) return -ENODEV; } - snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "psnet[%s]-bars", pci_name(pdev)); + name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "psnet[%s]-bars", pci_name(pdev)); + if (!name) + return -ENOMEM; + ret = pcim_iomap_regions(pdev, mask, name); if (ret) { SNET_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request and map PCI BARs\n"); @@ -590,10 +593,13 @@ static int psnet_open_pf_bar(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct psnet *psnet) static int snet_open_vf_bar(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct snet *snet) { - char name[50]; + char *name; int ret; - snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "snet[%s]-bar", pci_name(pdev)); + name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "snet[%s]-bars", pci_name(pdev)); + if (!name) + return -ENOMEM; + /* Request and map BAR */ ret = pcim_iomap_regions(pdev, BIT(snet->psnet->cfg.vf_bar), name); if (ret) { -- 2.46.1

8 months, 2 weeks

5
7
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: s390: gaccess: Check if guest address is in memslot" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-4.19.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024101827-implosion-twilight-c8e1@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 4.19.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nico Boehr <nrb(a)linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 17:18:33 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: s390: gaccess: Check if guest address is in memslot Previously, access_guest_page() did not check whether the given guest address is inside of a memslot. This is not a problem, since kvm_write_guest_page/kvm_read_guest_page return -EFAULT in this case. However, -EFAULT is also returned when copy_to/from_user fails. When emulating a guest instruction, the address being outside a memslot usually means that an addressing exception should be injected into the guest. Failure in copy_to/from_user however indicates that something is wrong in userspace and hence should be handled there. To be able to distinguish these two cases, return PGM_ADDRESSING in access_guest_page() when the guest address is outside guest memory. In access_guest_real(), populate vcpu->arch.pgm.code such that kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond() can be used in the caller for injecting into the guest (if applicable). Since this adds a new return value to access_guest_page(), we need to make sure that other callers are not confused by the new positive return value. There are the following users of access_guest_page(): - access_guest_with_key() does the checking itself (in guest_range_to_gpas()), so this case should never happen. Even if, the handling is set up properly. - access_guest_real() just passes the return code to its callers, which are: - read_guest_real() - see below - write_guest_real() - see below There are the following users of read_guest_real(): - ar_translation() in gaccess.c which already returns PGM_* - setup_apcb10(), setup_apcb00(), setup_apcb11() in vsie.c which always return -EFAULT on read_guest_read() nonzero return - no change - shadow_crycb(), handle_stfle() always present this as validity, this could be handled better but doesn't change current behaviour - no change There are the following users of write_guest_real(): - kvm_s390_store_status_unloaded() always returns -EFAULT on write_guest_real() failure. Fixes: 2293897805c2 ("KVM: s390: add architecture compliant guest access functions") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb(a)linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca(a)linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240917151904.74314-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja(a)linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca(a)linux.ibm.com> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c index e65f597e3044..a688351f4ab5 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c @@ -828,6 +828,8 @@ static int access_guest_page(struct kvm *kvm, enum gacc_mode mode, gpa_t gpa, const gfn_t gfn = gpa_to_gfn(gpa); int rc; + if (!gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn)) + return PGM_ADDRESSING; if (mode == GACC_STORE) rc = kvm_write_guest_page(kvm, gfn, data, offset, len); else @@ -985,6 +987,8 @@ int access_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra, gra += fragment_len; data += fragment_len; } + if (rc > 0) + vcpu->arch.pgm.code = rc; return rc; } diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h index b320d12aa049..3fde45a151f2 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h @@ -405,11 +405,12 @@ int read_guest_abs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gpa, void *data, * @len: number of bytes to copy * * Copy @len bytes from @data (kernel space) to @gra (guest real address). - * It is up to the caller to ensure that the entire guest memory range is - * valid memory before calling this function. * Guest low address and key protection are not checked. * - * Returns zero on success or -EFAULT on error. + * Returns zero on success, -EFAULT when copying from @data failed, or + * PGM_ADRESSING in case @gra is outside a memslot. In this case, pgm check info + * is also stored to allow injecting into the guest (if applicable) using + * kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(). * * If an error occurs data may have been copied partially to guest memory. */ @@ -428,11 +429,12 @@ int write_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra, void *data, * @len: number of bytes to copy * * Copy @len bytes from @gra (guest real address) to @data (kernel space). - * It is up to the caller to ensure that the entire guest memory range is - * valid memory before calling this function. * Guest key protection is not checked. * - * Returns zero on success or -EFAULT on error. + * Returns zero on success, -EFAULT when copying to @data failed, or + * PGM_ADRESSING in case @gra is outside a memslot. In this case, pgm check info + * is also stored to allow injecting into the guest (if applicable) using + * kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(). * * If an error occurs data may have been copied partially to kernel space. */

8 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: s390: gaccess: Check if guest address is in memslot" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024101826-gracious-singer-816f@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nico Boehr <nrb(a)linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 17:18:33 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: s390: gaccess: Check if guest address is in memslot Previously, access_guest_page() did not check whether the given guest address is inside of a memslot. This is not a problem, since kvm_write_guest_page/kvm_read_guest_page return -EFAULT in this case. However, -EFAULT is also returned when copy_to/from_user fails. When emulating a guest instruction, the address being outside a memslot usually means that an addressing exception should be injected into the guest. Failure in copy_to/from_user however indicates that something is wrong in userspace and hence should be handled there. To be able to distinguish these two cases, return PGM_ADDRESSING in access_guest_page() when the guest address is outside guest memory. In access_guest_real(), populate vcpu->arch.pgm.code such that kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond() can be used in the caller for injecting into the guest (if applicable). Since this adds a new return value to access_guest_page(), we need to make sure that other callers are not confused by the new positive return value. There are the following users of access_guest_page(): - access_guest_with_key() does the checking itself (in guest_range_to_gpas()), so this case should never happen. Even if, the handling is set up properly. - access_guest_real() just passes the return code to its callers, which are: - read_guest_real() - see below - write_guest_real() - see below There are the following users of read_guest_real(): - ar_translation() in gaccess.c which already returns PGM_* - setup_apcb10(), setup_apcb00(), setup_apcb11() in vsie.c which always return -EFAULT on read_guest_read() nonzero return - no change - shadow_crycb(), handle_stfle() always present this as validity, this could be handled better but doesn't change current behaviour - no change There are the following users of write_guest_real(): - kvm_s390_store_status_unloaded() always returns -EFAULT on write_guest_real() failure. Fixes: 2293897805c2 ("KVM: s390: add architecture compliant guest access functions") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb(a)linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca(a)linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240917151904.74314-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja(a)linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca(a)linux.ibm.com> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c index e65f597e3044..a688351f4ab5 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c @@ -828,6 +828,8 @@ static int access_guest_page(struct kvm *kvm, enum gacc_mode mode, gpa_t gpa, const gfn_t gfn = gpa_to_gfn(gpa); int rc; + if (!gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn)) + return PGM_ADDRESSING; if (mode == GACC_STORE) rc = kvm_write_guest_page(kvm, gfn, data, offset, len); else @@ -985,6 +987,8 @@ int access_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra, gra += fragment_len; data += fragment_len; } + if (rc > 0) + vcpu->arch.pgm.code = rc; return rc; } diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h index b320d12aa049..3fde45a151f2 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h @@ -405,11 +405,12 @@ int read_guest_abs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gpa, void *data, * @len: number of bytes to copy * * Copy @len bytes from @data (kernel space) to @gra (guest real address). - * It is up to the caller to ensure that the entire guest memory range is - * valid memory before calling this function. * Guest low address and key protection are not checked. * - * Returns zero on success or -EFAULT on error. + * Returns zero on success, -EFAULT when copying from @data failed, or + * PGM_ADRESSING in case @gra is outside a memslot. In this case, pgm check info + * is also stored to allow injecting into the guest (if applicable) using + * kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(). * * If an error occurs data may have been copied partially to guest memory. */ @@ -428,11 +429,12 @@ int write_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra, void *data, * @len: number of bytes to copy * * Copy @len bytes from @gra (guest real address) to @data (kernel space). - * It is up to the caller to ensure that the entire guest memory range is - * valid memory before calling this function. * Guest key protection is not checked. * - * Returns zero on success or -EFAULT on error. + * Returns zero on success, -EFAULT when copying to @data failed, or + * PGM_ADRESSING in case @gra is outside a memslot. In this case, pgm check info + * is also stored to allow injecting into the guest (if applicable) using + * kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(). * * If an error occurs data may have been copied partially to kernel space. */

8 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: s390: gaccess: Check if guest address is in memslot" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024101824-departure-oversight-aa1e@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nico Boehr <nrb(a)linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 17:18:33 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: s390: gaccess: Check if guest address is in memslot Previously, access_guest_page() did not check whether the given guest address is inside of a memslot. This is not a problem, since kvm_write_guest_page/kvm_read_guest_page return -EFAULT in this case. However, -EFAULT is also returned when copy_to/from_user fails. When emulating a guest instruction, the address being outside a memslot usually means that an addressing exception should be injected into the guest. Failure in copy_to/from_user however indicates that something is wrong in userspace and hence should be handled there. To be able to distinguish these two cases, return PGM_ADDRESSING in access_guest_page() when the guest address is outside guest memory. In access_guest_real(), populate vcpu->arch.pgm.code such that kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond() can be used in the caller for injecting into the guest (if applicable). Since this adds a new return value to access_guest_page(), we need to make sure that other callers are not confused by the new positive return value. There are the following users of access_guest_page(): - access_guest_with_key() does the checking itself (in guest_range_to_gpas()), so this case should never happen. Even if, the handling is set up properly. - access_guest_real() just passes the return code to its callers, which are: - read_guest_real() - see below - write_guest_real() - see below There are the following users of read_guest_real(): - ar_translation() in gaccess.c which already returns PGM_* - setup_apcb10(), setup_apcb00(), setup_apcb11() in vsie.c which always return -EFAULT on read_guest_read() nonzero return - no change - shadow_crycb(), handle_stfle() always present this as validity, this could be handled better but doesn't change current behaviour - no change There are the following users of write_guest_real(): - kvm_s390_store_status_unloaded() always returns -EFAULT on write_guest_real() failure. Fixes: 2293897805c2 ("KVM: s390: add architecture compliant guest access functions") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb(a)linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca(a)linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240917151904.74314-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja(a)linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca(a)linux.ibm.com> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c index e65f597e3044..a688351f4ab5 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c @@ -828,6 +828,8 @@ static int access_guest_page(struct kvm *kvm, enum gacc_mode mode, gpa_t gpa, const gfn_t gfn = gpa_to_gfn(gpa); int rc; + if (!gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn)) + return PGM_ADDRESSING; if (mode == GACC_STORE) rc = kvm_write_guest_page(kvm, gfn, data, offset, len); else @@ -985,6 +987,8 @@ int access_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra, gra += fragment_len; data += fragment_len; } + if (rc > 0) + vcpu->arch.pgm.code = rc; return rc; } diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h index b320d12aa049..3fde45a151f2 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h @@ -405,11 +405,12 @@ int read_guest_abs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gpa, void *data, * @len: number of bytes to copy * * Copy @len bytes from @data (kernel space) to @gra (guest real address). - * It is up to the caller to ensure that the entire guest memory range is - * valid memory before calling this function. * Guest low address and key protection are not checked. * - * Returns zero on success or -EFAULT on error. + * Returns zero on success, -EFAULT when copying from @data failed, or + * PGM_ADRESSING in case @gra is outside a memslot. In this case, pgm check info + * is also stored to allow injecting into the guest (if applicable) using + * kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(). * * If an error occurs data may have been copied partially to guest memory. */ @@ -428,11 +429,12 @@ int write_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra, void *data, * @len: number of bytes to copy * * Copy @len bytes from @gra (guest real address) to @data (kernel space). - * It is up to the caller to ensure that the entire guest memory range is - * valid memory before calling this function. * Guest key protection is not checked. * - * Returns zero on success or -EFAULT on error. + * Returns zero on success, -EFAULT when copying to @data failed, or + * PGM_ADRESSING in case @gra is outside a memslot. In this case, pgm check info + * is also stored to allow injecting into the guest (if applicable) using + * kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(). * * If an error occurs data may have been copied partially to kernel space. */

8 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: s390: gaccess: Check if guest address is in memslot" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024101823-tractor-twitter-a318@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nico Boehr <nrb(a)linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 17:18:33 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: s390: gaccess: Check if guest address is in memslot Previously, access_guest_page() did not check whether the given guest address is inside of a memslot. This is not a problem, since kvm_write_guest_page/kvm_read_guest_page return -EFAULT in this case. However, -EFAULT is also returned when copy_to/from_user fails. When emulating a guest instruction, the address being outside a memslot usually means that an addressing exception should be injected into the guest. Failure in copy_to/from_user however indicates that something is wrong in userspace and hence should be handled there. To be able to distinguish these two cases, return PGM_ADDRESSING in access_guest_page() when the guest address is outside guest memory. In access_guest_real(), populate vcpu->arch.pgm.code such that kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond() can be used in the caller for injecting into the guest (if applicable). Since this adds a new return value to access_guest_page(), we need to make sure that other callers are not confused by the new positive return value. There are the following users of access_guest_page(): - access_guest_with_key() does the checking itself (in guest_range_to_gpas()), so this case should never happen. Even if, the handling is set up properly. - access_guest_real() just passes the return code to its callers, which are: - read_guest_real() - see below - write_guest_real() - see below There are the following users of read_guest_real(): - ar_translation() in gaccess.c which already returns PGM_* - setup_apcb10(), setup_apcb00(), setup_apcb11() in vsie.c which always return -EFAULT on read_guest_read() nonzero return - no change - shadow_crycb(), handle_stfle() always present this as validity, this could be handled better but doesn't change current behaviour - no change There are the following users of write_guest_real(): - kvm_s390_store_status_unloaded() always returns -EFAULT on write_guest_real() failure. Fixes: 2293897805c2 ("KVM: s390: add architecture compliant guest access functions") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb(a)linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca(a)linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240917151904.74314-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja(a)linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca(a)linux.ibm.com> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c index e65f597e3044..a688351f4ab5 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c @@ -828,6 +828,8 @@ static int access_guest_page(struct kvm *kvm, enum gacc_mode mode, gpa_t gpa, const gfn_t gfn = gpa_to_gfn(gpa); int rc; + if (!gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn)) + return PGM_ADDRESSING; if (mode == GACC_STORE) rc = kvm_write_guest_page(kvm, gfn, data, offset, len); else @@ -985,6 +987,8 @@ int access_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra, gra += fragment_len; data += fragment_len; } + if (rc > 0) + vcpu->arch.pgm.code = rc; return rc; } diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h index b320d12aa049..3fde45a151f2 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h @@ -405,11 +405,12 @@ int read_guest_abs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gpa, void *data, * @len: number of bytes to copy * * Copy @len bytes from @data (kernel space) to @gra (guest real address). - * It is up to the caller to ensure that the entire guest memory range is - * valid memory before calling this function. * Guest low address and key protection are not checked. * - * Returns zero on success or -EFAULT on error. + * Returns zero on success, -EFAULT when copying from @data failed, or + * PGM_ADRESSING in case @gra is outside a memslot. In this case, pgm check info + * is also stored to allow injecting into the guest (if applicable) using + * kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(). * * If an error occurs data may have been copied partially to guest memory. */ @@ -428,11 +429,12 @@ int write_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra, void *data, * @len: number of bytes to copy * * Copy @len bytes from @gra (guest real address) to @data (kernel space). - * It is up to the caller to ensure that the entire guest memory range is - * valid memory before calling this function. * Guest key protection is not checked. * - * Returns zero on success or -EFAULT on error. + * Returns zero on success, -EFAULT when copying to @data failed, or + * PGM_ADRESSING in case @gra is outside a memslot. In this case, pgm check info + * is also stored to allow injecting into the guest (if applicable) using + * kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(). * * If an error occurs data may have been copied partially to kernel space. */

8 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

[PATCH 5.10] gfs2: Fix potential glock use-after-free on unmount

by He Zhe

From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba(a)redhat.com> commit 0636b34b44589b142700ac137b5f69802cfe2e37 upstream. When a DLM lockspace is released and there ares still locks in that lockspace, DLM will unlock those locks automatically. Commit fb6791d100d1b started exploiting this behavior to speed up filesystem unmount: gfs2 would simply free glocks it didn't want to unlock and then release the lockspace. This didn't take the bast callbacks for asynchronous lock contention notifications into account, which remain active until until a lock is unlocked or its lockspace is released. To prevent those callbacks from accessing deallocated objects, put the glocks that should not be unlocked on the sd_dead_glocks list, release the lockspace, and only then free those glocks. As an additional measure, ignore unexpected ast and bast callbacks if the receiving glock is dead. Fixes: fb6791d100d1b ("GFS2: skip dlm_unlock calls in unmount") Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba(a)redhat.com> Cc: David Teigland <teigland(a)redhat.com> CVE: CVE-2024-38570 [Zhe: sd_glock_wait in gfs2_glock_free_later is not renamed to sd_kill_wait yet. So still use sd_glock_wait in gfs2_glock_free_later in this case.] Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he(a)windriver.com> --- fs/gfs2/glock.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- fs/gfs2/glock.h | 1 + fs/gfs2/incore.h | 1 + fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c | 13 +++++++++++-- fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c | 1 + fs/gfs2/super.c | 3 --- 6 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.c b/fs/gfs2/glock.c index b0f01a8e3776..11206d810344 100644 --- a/fs/gfs2/glock.c +++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.c @@ -159,19 +159,46 @@ static bool glock_blocked_by_withdraw(struct gfs2_glock *gl) return true; } -void gfs2_glock_free(struct gfs2_glock *gl) +static void __gfs2_glock_free(struct gfs2_glock *gl) { - struct gfs2_sbd *sdp = gl->gl_name.ln_sbd; - gfs2_glock_assert_withdraw(gl, atomic_read(&gl->gl_revokes) == 0); rhashtable_remove_fast(&gl_hash_table, &gl->gl_node, ht_parms); smp_mb(); wake_up_glock(gl); call_rcu(&gl->gl_rcu, gfs2_glock_dealloc); +} + +void gfs2_glock_free(struct gfs2_glock *gl) { + struct gfs2_sbd *sdp = gl->gl_name.ln_sbd; + + __gfs2_glock_free(gl); if (atomic_dec_and_test(&sdp->sd_glock_disposal)) wake_up(&sdp->sd_glock_wait); } +void gfs2_glock_free_later(struct gfs2_glock *gl) { + struct gfs2_sbd *sdp = gl->gl_name.ln_sbd; + + spin_lock(&lru_lock); + list_add(&gl->gl_lru, &sdp->sd_dead_glocks); + spin_unlock(&lru_lock); + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&sdp->sd_glock_disposal)) + wake_up(&sdp->sd_glock_wait); +} + +static void gfs2_free_dead_glocks(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp) +{ + struct list_head *list = &sdp->sd_dead_glocks; + + while(!list_empty(list)) { + struct gfs2_glock *gl; + + gl = list_first_entry(list, struct gfs2_glock, gl_lru); + list_del_init(&gl->gl_lru); + __gfs2_glock_free(gl); + } +} + /** * gfs2_glock_hold() - increment reference count on glock * @gl: The glock to hold @@ -2016,6 +2043,8 @@ void gfs2_gl_hash_clear(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp) wait_event_timeout(sdp->sd_glock_wait, atomic_read(&sdp->sd_glock_disposal) == 0, HZ * 600); + gfs2_lm_unmount(sdp); + gfs2_free_dead_glocks(sdp); glock_hash_walk(dump_glock_func, sdp); } diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.h b/fs/gfs2/glock.h index 53813364517b..b81b369e7485 100644 --- a/fs/gfs2/glock.h +++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.h @@ -253,6 +253,7 @@ extern void gfs2_glock_finish_truncate(struct gfs2_inode *ip); extern void gfs2_glock_thaw(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp); extern void gfs2_glock_add_to_lru(struct gfs2_glock *gl); extern void gfs2_glock_free(struct gfs2_glock *gl); +extern void gfs2_glock_free_later(struct gfs2_glock *gl); extern int __init gfs2_glock_init(void); extern void gfs2_glock_exit(void); diff --git a/fs/gfs2/incore.h b/fs/gfs2/incore.h index f8858d995b24..44cee9a4eef6 100644 --- a/fs/gfs2/incore.h +++ b/fs/gfs2/incore.h @@ -863,6 +863,7 @@ struct gfs2_sbd { struct gfs2_holder sd_freeze_gh; atomic_t sd_freeze_state; struct mutex sd_freeze_mutex; + struct list_head sd_dead_glocks; char sd_fsname[GFS2_FSNAME_LEN + 3 * sizeof(int) + 2]; char sd_table_name[GFS2_FSNAME_LEN]; diff --git a/fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c b/fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c index 5564aa8b4592..9aad03f0dcdf 100644 --- a/fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c +++ b/fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c @@ -118,6 +118,11 @@ static void gdlm_ast(void *arg) struct gfs2_glock *gl = arg; unsigned ret = gl->gl_state; + /* If the glock is dead, we only react to a dlm_unlock() reply. */ + if (__lockref_is_dead(&gl->gl_lockref) && + gl->gl_lksb.sb_status != -DLM_EUNLOCK) + return; + gfs2_update_reply_times(gl); BUG_ON(gl->gl_lksb.sb_flags & DLM_SBF_DEMOTED); @@ -168,6 +173,9 @@ static void gdlm_bast(void *arg, int mode) { struct gfs2_glock *gl = arg; + if (__lockref_is_dead(&gl->gl_lockref)) + return; + switch (mode) { case DLM_LOCK_EX: gfs2_glock_cb(gl, LM_ST_UNLOCKED); @@ -286,6 +294,8 @@ static void gdlm_put_lock(struct gfs2_glock *gl) struct lm_lockstruct *ls = &sdp->sd_lockstruct; int error; + BUG_ON(!__lockref_is_dead(&gl->gl_lockref)); + if (gl->gl_lksb.sb_lkid == 0) { gfs2_glock_free(gl); return; @@ -305,7 +315,7 @@ static void gdlm_put_lock(struct gfs2_glock *gl) if (test_bit(SDF_SKIP_DLM_UNLOCK, &sdp->sd_flags) && !gl->gl_lksb.sb_lvbptr) { - gfs2_glock_free(gl); + gfs2_glock_free_later(gl); return; } @@ -315,7 +325,6 @@ static void gdlm_put_lock(struct gfs2_glock *gl) fs_err(sdp, "gdlm_unlock %x,%llx err=%d\n", gl->gl_name.ln_type, (unsigned long long)gl->gl_name.ln_number, error); - return; } } diff --git a/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c b/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c index 648f7336043f..4a8c070d14cf 100644 --- a/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c +++ b/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ static struct gfs2_sbd *init_sbd(struct super_block *sb) init_waitqueue_head(&sdp->sd_log_flush_wait); atomic_set(&sdp->sd_freeze_state, SFS_UNFROZEN); mutex_init(&sdp->sd_freeze_mutex); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sdp->sd_dead_glocks); return sdp; diff --git a/fs/gfs2/super.c b/fs/gfs2/super.c index 8cf4ef61cdc4..039d678b1689 100644 --- a/fs/gfs2/super.c +++ b/fs/gfs2/super.c @@ -662,10 +662,7 @@ static void gfs2_put_super(struct super_block *sb) gfs2_gl_hash_clear(sdp); truncate_inode_pages_final(&sdp->sd_aspace); gfs2_delete_debugfs_file(sdp); - /* Unmount the locking protocol */ - gfs2_lm_unmount(sdp); - /* At this point, we're through participating in the lockspace */ gfs2_sys_fs_del(sdp); free_sbd(sdp); } -- 2.25.1

8 months, 2 weeks

2
9
0 0

[PATCH 4.19] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Fix out-of-bound access

by hsimeliere.opensource＠witekio.com

From: Joseph Huang <Joseph.Huang(a)garmin.com> commit 528876d867a23b5198022baf2e388052ca67c952 upstream. If an ATU violation was caused by a CPU Load operation, the SPID could be larger than DSA_MAX_PORTS (the size of mv88e6xxx_chip.ports[] array). Fixes: 75c05a74e745 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Fix counting of ATU violations") Signed-off-by: Joseph Huang <Joseph.Huang(a)garmin.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew(a)lunn.ch> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240819235251.1331763-1-Joseph.Huang@garmin.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bruno VERNAY <bruno.vernay(a)se.com> Signed-off-by: Hugo SIMELIERE <hsimeliere.opensource(a)witekio.com> --- drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c index ea243840ee0f..aca35c9d9fbd 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c @@ -363,7 +363,8 @@ static irqreturn_t mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_prob_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id) dev_err_ratelimited(chip->dev, "ATU full violation for %pM portvec %x spid %d\n", entry.mac, entry.portvec, spid); - chip->ports[spid].atu_full_violation++; + if (spid < ARRAY_SIZE(chip->ports)) + chip->ports[spid].atu_full_violation++; } mutex_unlock(&chip->reg_lock); -- 2.43.0

8 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

[PATCH 05/13] media: mgb4: protect driver against spectre

by Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Frequency range is set from sysfs via frequency_range_store(), being vulnerable to spectre, as reported by smatch: drivers/media/pci/mgb4/mgb4_cmt.c:231 mgb4_cmt_set_vin_freq_range() warn: potential spectre issue 'cmt_vals_in' [r] drivers/media/pci/mgb4/mgb4_cmt.c:238 mgb4_cmt_set_vin_freq_range() warn: possible spectre second half. 'reg_set' Fix it. Fixes: 0ab13674a9bd ("media: pci: mgb4: Added Digiteq Automotive MGB4 driver") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei(a)kernel.org> --- drivers/media/pci/mgb4/mgb4_cmt.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/mgb4/mgb4_cmt.c b/drivers/media/pci/mgb4/mgb4_cmt.c index 70dc78ef193c..a25b68403bc6 100644 --- a/drivers/media/pci/mgb4/mgb4_cmt.c +++ b/drivers/media/pci/mgb4/mgb4_cmt.c @@ -227,6 +227,8 @@ void mgb4_cmt_set_vin_freq_range(struct mgb4_vin_dev *vindev, u32 config; size_t i; + freq_range = array_index_nospec(freq_range, ARRAY_SIZE(cmt_vals_in)); + addr = cmt_addrs_in[vindev->config->id]; reg_set = cmt_vals_in[freq_range]; -- 2.47.0

8 months, 2 weeks

2
3
0 0

[PATCH v2] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_pas: disable auto boot for wpss

by Balaji Pothunoori

Currently, the rproc "atomic_t power" variable is incremented during: a. WPSS rproc auto boot. b. AHB power on for ath11k. During AHB power off (rmmod ath11k_ahb.ko), rproc_shutdown fails to unload the WPSS firmware because the rproc->power value is '2', causing the atomic_dec_and_test(&rproc->power) condition to fail. Consequently, during AHB power on (insmod ath11k_ahb.ko), QMI_WLANFW_HOST_CAP_REQ_V01 fails due to the host and firmware QMI states being out of sync. Fixes: 300ed425dfa9 ("remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_pas: Add SC7280 ADSP, CDSP & WPSS") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Balaji Pothunoori <quic_bpothuno(a)quicinc.com> --- v2: updated commit text. added Fixes/cc:stable tags. drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c index ef82835e98a4..05963d7924df 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c @@ -1344,7 +1344,7 @@ static const struct adsp_data sc7280_wpss_resource = { .crash_reason_smem = 626, .firmware_name = "wpss.mdt", .pas_id = 6, - .auto_boot = true, + .auto_boot = false, .proxy_pd_names = (char*[]){ "cx", "mx", -- 2.34.1

8 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror October 2024