The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024101824-departure-oversight-aa1e@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nico Boehr <nrb(a)linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 17:18:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: s390: gaccess: Check if guest address is in memslot
Previously, access_guest_page() did not check whether the given guest
address is inside of a memslot. This is not a problem, since
kvm_write_guest_page/kvm_read_guest_page return -EFAULT in this case.
However, -EFAULT is also returned when copy_to/from_user fails.
When emulating a guest instruction, the address being outside a memslot
usually means that an addressing exception should be injected into the
guest.
Failure in copy_to/from_user however indicates that something is wrong
in userspace and hence should be handled there.
To be able to distinguish these two cases, return PGM_ADDRESSING in
access_guest_page() when the guest address is outside guest memory. In
access_guest_real(), populate vcpu->arch.pgm.code such that
kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond() can be used in the caller for injecting into
the guest (if applicable).
Since this adds a new return value to access_guest_page(), we need to make
sure that other callers are not confused by the new positive return value.
There are the following users of access_guest_page():
- access_guest_with_key() does the checking itself (in
guest_range_to_gpas()), so this case should never happen. Even if, the
handling is set up properly.
- access_guest_real() just passes the return code to its callers, which
are:
- read_guest_real() - see below
- write_guest_real() - see below
There are the following users of read_guest_real():
- ar_translation() in gaccess.c which already returns PGM_*
- setup_apcb10(), setup_apcb00(), setup_apcb11() in vsie.c which always
return -EFAULT on read_guest_read() nonzero return - no change
- shadow_crycb(), handle_stfle() always present this as validity, this
could be handled better but doesn't change current behaviour - no change
There are the following users of write_guest_real():
- kvm_s390_store_status_unloaded() always returns -EFAULT on
write_guest_real() failure.
Fixes: 2293897805c2 ("KVM: s390: add architecture compliant guest access functions")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb(a)linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca(a)linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240917151904.74314-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja(a)linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca(a)linux.ibm.com>
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
index e65f597e3044..a688351f4ab5 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
@@ -828,6 +828,8 @@ static int access_guest_page(struct kvm *kvm, enum gacc_mode mode, gpa_t gpa,
const gfn_t gfn = gpa_to_gfn(gpa);
int rc;
+ if (!gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn))
+ return PGM_ADDRESSING;
if (mode == GACC_STORE)
rc = kvm_write_guest_page(kvm, gfn, data, offset, len);
else
@@ -985,6 +987,8 @@ int access_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra,
gra += fragment_len;
data += fragment_len;
}
+ if (rc > 0)
+ vcpu->arch.pgm.code = rc;
return rc;
}
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
index b320d12aa049..3fde45a151f2 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
@@ -405,11 +405,12 @@ int read_guest_abs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gpa, void *data,
* @len: number of bytes to copy
*
* Copy @len bytes from @data (kernel space) to @gra (guest real address).
- * It is up to the caller to ensure that the entire guest memory range is
- * valid memory before calling this function.
* Guest low address and key protection are not checked.
*
- * Returns zero on success or -EFAULT on error.
+ * Returns zero on success, -EFAULT when copying from @data failed, or
+ * PGM_ADRESSING in case @gra is outside a memslot. In this case, pgm check info
+ * is also stored to allow injecting into the guest (if applicable) using
+ * kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond().
*
* If an error occurs data may have been copied partially to guest memory.
*/
@@ -428,11 +429,12 @@ int write_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra, void *data,
* @len: number of bytes to copy
*
* Copy @len bytes from @gra (guest real address) to @data (kernel space).
- * It is up to the caller to ensure that the entire guest memory range is
- * valid memory before calling this function.
* Guest key protection is not checked.
*
- * Returns zero on success or -EFAULT on error.
+ * Returns zero on success, -EFAULT when copying to @data failed, or
+ * PGM_ADRESSING in case @gra is outside a memslot. In this case, pgm check info
+ * is also stored to allow injecting into the guest (if applicable) using
+ * kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond().
*
* If an error occurs data may have been copied partially to kernel space.
*/
The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024101823-tractor-twitter-a318@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nico Boehr <nrb(a)linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 17:18:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: s390: gaccess: Check if guest address is in memslot
Previously, access_guest_page() did not check whether the given guest
address is inside of a memslot. This is not a problem, since
kvm_write_guest_page/kvm_read_guest_page return -EFAULT in this case.
However, -EFAULT is also returned when copy_to/from_user fails.
When emulating a guest instruction, the address being outside a memslot
usually means that an addressing exception should be injected into the
guest.
Failure in copy_to/from_user however indicates that something is wrong
in userspace and hence should be handled there.
To be able to distinguish these two cases, return PGM_ADDRESSING in
access_guest_page() when the guest address is outside guest memory. In
access_guest_real(), populate vcpu->arch.pgm.code such that
kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond() can be used in the caller for injecting into
the guest (if applicable).
Since this adds a new return value to access_guest_page(), we need to make
sure that other callers are not confused by the new positive return value.
There are the following users of access_guest_page():
- access_guest_with_key() does the checking itself (in
guest_range_to_gpas()), so this case should never happen. Even if, the
handling is set up properly.
- access_guest_real() just passes the return code to its callers, which
are:
- read_guest_real() - see below
- write_guest_real() - see below
There are the following users of read_guest_real():
- ar_translation() in gaccess.c which already returns PGM_*
- setup_apcb10(), setup_apcb00(), setup_apcb11() in vsie.c which always
return -EFAULT on read_guest_read() nonzero return - no change
- shadow_crycb(), handle_stfle() always present this as validity, this
could be handled better but doesn't change current behaviour - no change
There are the following users of write_guest_real():
- kvm_s390_store_status_unloaded() always returns -EFAULT on
write_guest_real() failure.
Fixes: 2293897805c2 ("KVM: s390: add architecture compliant guest access functions")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb(a)linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca(a)linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240917151904.74314-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja(a)linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca(a)linux.ibm.com>
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
index e65f597e3044..a688351f4ab5 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
@@ -828,6 +828,8 @@ static int access_guest_page(struct kvm *kvm, enum gacc_mode mode, gpa_t gpa,
const gfn_t gfn = gpa_to_gfn(gpa);
int rc;
+ if (!gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn))
+ return PGM_ADDRESSING;
if (mode == GACC_STORE)
rc = kvm_write_guest_page(kvm, gfn, data, offset, len);
else
@@ -985,6 +987,8 @@ int access_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra,
gra += fragment_len;
data += fragment_len;
}
+ if (rc > 0)
+ vcpu->arch.pgm.code = rc;
return rc;
}
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
index b320d12aa049..3fde45a151f2 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
@@ -405,11 +405,12 @@ int read_guest_abs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gpa, void *data,
* @len: number of bytes to copy
*
* Copy @len bytes from @data (kernel space) to @gra (guest real address).
- * It is up to the caller to ensure that the entire guest memory range is
- * valid memory before calling this function.
* Guest low address and key protection are not checked.
*
- * Returns zero on success or -EFAULT on error.
+ * Returns zero on success, -EFAULT when copying from @data failed, or
+ * PGM_ADRESSING in case @gra is outside a memslot. In this case, pgm check info
+ * is also stored to allow injecting into the guest (if applicable) using
+ * kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond().
*
* If an error occurs data may have been copied partially to guest memory.
*/
@@ -428,11 +429,12 @@ int write_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra, void *data,
* @len: number of bytes to copy
*
* Copy @len bytes from @gra (guest real address) to @data (kernel space).
- * It is up to the caller to ensure that the entire guest memory range is
- * valid memory before calling this function.
* Guest key protection is not checked.
*
- * Returns zero on success or -EFAULT on error.
+ * Returns zero on success, -EFAULT when copying to @data failed, or
+ * PGM_ADRESSING in case @gra is outside a memslot. In this case, pgm check info
+ * is also stored to allow injecting into the guest (if applicable) using
+ * kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond().
*
* If an error occurs data may have been copied partially to kernel space.
*/
Currently, the rproc "atomic_t power" variable is incremented during:
a. WPSS rproc auto boot.
b. AHB power on for ath11k.
During AHB power off (rmmod ath11k_ahb.ko), rproc_shutdown fails
to unload the WPSS firmware because the rproc->power value is '2',
causing the atomic_dec_and_test(&rproc->power) condition to fail.
Consequently, during AHB power on (insmod ath11k_ahb.ko),
QMI_WLANFW_HOST_CAP_REQ_V01 fails due to the host and firmware QMI
states being out of sync.
Fixes: 300ed425dfa9 ("remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_pas: Add SC7280 ADSP, CDSP & WPSS")
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Balaji Pothunoori <quic_bpothuno(a)quicinc.com>
---
v2: updated commit text.
added Fixes/cc:stable tags.
drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
index ef82835e98a4..05963d7924df 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
@@ -1344,7 +1344,7 @@ static const struct adsp_data sc7280_wpss_resource = {
.crash_reason_smem = 626,
.firmware_name = "wpss.mdt",
.pas_id = 6,
- .auto_boot = true,
+ .auto_boot = false,
.proxy_pd_names = (char*[]){
"cx",
"mx",
--
2.34.1
commit f011c9cf04c06f16b24f583d313d3c012e589e50 upstream.
The submit queue polling threads are userland threads that just never
exit to the userland. When creating the thread with IORING_SETUP_SQ_AFF,
the affinity of the poller thread is set to the cpu specified in
sq_thread_cpu. However, this CPU can be outside of the cpuset defined
by the cgroup cpuset controller. This violates the rules defined by the
cpuset controller and is a potential issue for realtime applications.
In b7ed6d8ffd6 we fixed the default affinity of the poller thread, in
case no explicit pinning is required by inheriting the one of the
creating task. In case of explicit pinning, the check is more
complicated, as also a cpu outside of the parent cpumask is allowed.
We implemented this by using cpuset_cpus_allowed (that has support for
cgroup cpusets) and testing if the requested cpu is in the set.
Fixes: 37d1e2e3642e ("io_uring: move SQPOLL thread io-wq forked worker")
Signed-off-by: Felix Moessbauer <felix.moessbauer(a)siemens.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240909150036.55921-1-felix.moessbauer@siemens.c…
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org>
---
io_uring/io_uring.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 8ed2c65529714..6b6fd244233f8 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/mman.h>
#include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/cpuset.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/blkdev.h>
#include <linux/bvec.h>
@@ -8746,10 +8747,12 @@ static int io_sq_offload_create(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
return 0;
if (p->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQ_AFF) {
+ struct cpumask allowed_mask;
int cpu = p->sq_thread_cpu;
ret = -EINVAL;
- if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_online(cpu))
+ cpuset_cpus_allowed(current, &allowed_mask);
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &allowed_mask))
goto err_sqpoll;
sqd->sq_cpu = cpu;
} else {
--
2.39.5
Svacer reports a NULL-pointer dereference in rtl8xxxu_probe().
After having been compared to a NULL value, pointer hw is passed as
1st parameter in call to ieee80211_free_hw(), where it is dereferenced.
The problem is present in 5.10 stable release and can be fixed by the
following upstream patch that can be cleanly applied to 5.10 branch.