May 2022 - Linux-stable-mirror

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Move shadow-present check out of" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 54eb3ef56f36827aad90915df33387d4c2b5df5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc(a)google.com> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 03:47:42 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Move shadow-present check out of spte_has_volatile_bits() Move the is_shadow_present_pte() check out of spte_has_volatile_bits() and into its callers. Well, caller, since only one of its two callers doesn't already do the shadow-present check. Opportunistically move the helper to spte.c/h so that it can be used by the TDP MMU, which is also the primary motivation for the shadow-present change. Unlike the legacy MMU, the TDP MMU uses a single path for clear leaf and non-leaf SPTEs, and to avoid unnecessary atomic updates, the TDP MMU will need to check is_last_spte() prior to calling spte_has_volatile_bits(), and calling is_last_spte() without first calling is_shadow_present_spte() is at best odd, and at worst a violation of KVM's loosely defines SPTE rules. Note, mmu_spte_clear_track_bits() could likely skip the write entirely for SPTEs that are not shadow-present. Leave that cleanup for a future patch to avoid introducing a functional change, and because the shadow-present check can likely be moved further up the stack, e.g. drop_large_spte() appears to be the only path that doesn't already explicitly check for a shadow-present SPTE. No functional change intended. Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc(a)google.com> Message-Id: <20220423034752.1161007-3-seanjc(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c index 48dcb6a782f4..311e4e1d7870 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c @@ -473,32 +473,6 @@ static u64 __get_spte_lockless(u64 *sptep) } #endif -static bool spte_has_volatile_bits(u64 spte) -{ - if (!is_shadow_present_pte(spte)) - return false; - - /* - * Always atomically update spte if it can be updated - * out of mmu-lock, it can ensure dirty bit is not lost, - * also, it can help us to get a stable is_writable_pte() - * to ensure tlb flush is not missed. - */ - if (!is_writable_pte(spte) && is_mmu_writable_spte(spte)) - return true; - - if (is_access_track_spte(spte)) - return true; - - if (spte_ad_enabled(spte)) { - if (!(spte & shadow_accessed_mask) || - (is_writable_pte(spte) && !(spte & shadow_dirty_mask))) - return true; - } - - return false; -} - /* Rules for using mmu_spte_set: * Set the sptep from nonpresent to present. * Note: the sptep being assigned *must* be either not present @@ -593,7 +567,8 @@ static int mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep) u64 old_spte = *sptep; int level = sptep_to_sp(sptep)->role.level; - if (!spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte)) + if (!is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte) || + !spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte)) __update_clear_spte_fast(sptep, 0ull); else old_spte = __update_clear_spte_slow(sptep, 0ull); diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c index 4739b53c9734..e5c0b6db6f2c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c @@ -90,6 +90,34 @@ static bool kvm_is_mmio_pfn(kvm_pfn_t pfn) E820_TYPE_RAM); } +/* + * Returns true if the SPTE has bits that may be set without holding mmu_lock. + * The caller is responsible for checking if the SPTE is shadow-present, and + * for determining whether or not the caller cares about non-leaf SPTEs. + */ +bool spte_has_volatile_bits(u64 spte) +{ + /* + * Always atomically update spte if it can be updated + * out of mmu-lock, it can ensure dirty bit is not lost, + * also, it can help us to get a stable is_writable_pte() + * to ensure tlb flush is not missed. + */ + if (!is_writable_pte(spte) && is_mmu_writable_spte(spte)) + return true; + + if (is_access_track_spte(spte)) + return true; + + if (spte_ad_enabled(spte)) { + if (!(spte & shadow_accessed_mask) || + (is_writable_pte(spte) && !(spte & shadow_dirty_mask))) + return true; + } + + return false; +} + bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, unsigned int pte_access, gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn, diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h index c571784cb567..80ab0f5cff01 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h @@ -404,6 +404,8 @@ static inline u64 get_mmio_spte_generation(u64 spte) return gen; } +bool spte_has_volatile_bits(u64 spte); + bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, unsigned int pte_access, gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn,

2 years, 8 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Move shadow-present check out of" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 54eb3ef56f36827aad90915df33387d4c2b5df5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc(a)google.com> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 03:47:42 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Move shadow-present check out of spte_has_volatile_bits() Move the is_shadow_present_pte() check out of spte_has_volatile_bits() and into its callers. Well, caller, since only one of its two callers doesn't already do the shadow-present check. Opportunistically move the helper to spte.c/h so that it can be used by the TDP MMU, which is also the primary motivation for the shadow-present change. Unlike the legacy MMU, the TDP MMU uses a single path for clear leaf and non-leaf SPTEs, and to avoid unnecessary atomic updates, the TDP MMU will need to check is_last_spte() prior to calling spte_has_volatile_bits(), and calling is_last_spte() without first calling is_shadow_present_spte() is at best odd, and at worst a violation of KVM's loosely defines SPTE rules. Note, mmu_spte_clear_track_bits() could likely skip the write entirely for SPTEs that are not shadow-present. Leave that cleanup for a future patch to avoid introducing a functional change, and because the shadow-present check can likely be moved further up the stack, e.g. drop_large_spte() appears to be the only path that doesn't already explicitly check for a shadow-present SPTE. No functional change intended. Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc(a)google.com> Message-Id: <20220423034752.1161007-3-seanjc(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c index 48dcb6a782f4..311e4e1d7870 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c @@ -473,32 +473,6 @@ static u64 __get_spte_lockless(u64 *sptep) } #endif -static bool spte_has_volatile_bits(u64 spte) -{ - if (!is_shadow_present_pte(spte)) - return false; - - /* - * Always atomically update spte if it can be updated - * out of mmu-lock, it can ensure dirty bit is not lost, - * also, it can help us to get a stable is_writable_pte() - * to ensure tlb flush is not missed. - */ - if (!is_writable_pte(spte) && is_mmu_writable_spte(spte)) - return true; - - if (is_access_track_spte(spte)) - return true; - - if (spte_ad_enabled(spte)) { - if (!(spte & shadow_accessed_mask) || - (is_writable_pte(spte) && !(spte & shadow_dirty_mask))) - return true; - } - - return false; -} - /* Rules for using mmu_spte_set: * Set the sptep from nonpresent to present. * Note: the sptep being assigned *must* be either not present @@ -593,7 +567,8 @@ static int mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep) u64 old_spte = *sptep; int level = sptep_to_sp(sptep)->role.level; - if (!spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte)) + if (!is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte) || + !spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte)) __update_clear_spte_fast(sptep, 0ull); else old_spte = __update_clear_spte_slow(sptep, 0ull); diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c index 4739b53c9734..e5c0b6db6f2c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c @@ -90,6 +90,34 @@ static bool kvm_is_mmio_pfn(kvm_pfn_t pfn) E820_TYPE_RAM); } +/* + * Returns true if the SPTE has bits that may be set without holding mmu_lock. + * The caller is responsible for checking if the SPTE is shadow-present, and + * for determining whether or not the caller cares about non-leaf SPTEs. + */ +bool spte_has_volatile_bits(u64 spte) +{ + /* + * Always atomically update spte if it can be updated + * out of mmu-lock, it can ensure dirty bit is not lost, + * also, it can help us to get a stable is_writable_pte() + * to ensure tlb flush is not missed. + */ + if (!is_writable_pte(spte) && is_mmu_writable_spte(spte)) + return true; + + if (is_access_track_spte(spte)) + return true; + + if (spte_ad_enabled(spte)) { + if (!(spte & shadow_accessed_mask) || + (is_writable_pte(spte) && !(spte & shadow_dirty_mask))) + return true; + } + + return false; +} + bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, unsigned int pte_access, gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn, diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h index c571784cb567..80ab0f5cff01 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h @@ -404,6 +404,8 @@ static inline u64 get_mmio_spte_generation(u64 spte) return gen; } +bool spte_has_volatile_bits(u64 spte); + bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, unsigned int pte_access, gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn,

2 years, 8 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't treat fully writable SPTEs as volatile" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 706c9c55e5a32800605eb6a864ef6e1ca0c6c179 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc(a)google.com> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 03:47:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't treat fully writable SPTEs as volatile (modulo A/D) Don't treat SPTEs that are truly writable, i.e. writable in hardware, as being volatile (unless they're volatile for other reasons, e.g. A/D bits). KVM _sets_ the WRITABLE bit out of mmu_lock, but never _clears_ the bit out of mmu_lock, so if the WRITABLE bit is set, it cannot magically get cleared just because the SPTE is MMU-writable. Rename the wrapper of MMU-writable to be more literal, the previous name of spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable() is wrong and misleading. Fixes: c7ba5b48cc8d ("KVM: MMU: fast path of handling guest page fault") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc(a)google.com> Message-Id: <20220423034752.1161007-2-seanjc(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c index 64a2a7e2be90..48dcb6a782f4 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c @@ -484,13 +484,15 @@ static bool spte_has_volatile_bits(u64 spte) * also, it can help us to get a stable is_writable_pte() * to ensure tlb flush is not missed. */ - if (spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(spte) || - is_access_track_spte(spte)) + if (!is_writable_pte(spte) && is_mmu_writable_spte(spte)) + return true; + + if (is_access_track_spte(spte)) return true; if (spte_ad_enabled(spte)) { - if ((spte & shadow_accessed_mask) == 0 || - (is_writable_pte(spte) && (spte & shadow_dirty_mask) == 0)) + if (!(spte & shadow_accessed_mask) || + (is_writable_pte(spte) && !(spte & shadow_dirty_mask))) return true; } @@ -557,7 +559,7 @@ static bool mmu_spte_update(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte) * we always atomically update it, see the comments in * spte_has_volatile_bits(). */ - if (spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(old_spte) && + if (is_mmu_writable_spte(old_spte) && !is_writable_pte(new_spte)) flush = true; @@ -1187,7 +1189,7 @@ static bool spte_write_protect(u64 *sptep, bool pt_protect) u64 spte = *sptep; if (!is_writable_pte(spte) && - !(pt_protect && spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(spte))) + !(pt_protect && is_mmu_writable_spte(spte))) return false; rmap_printk("spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep); @@ -3196,8 +3198,7 @@ static int fast_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault) * be removed in the fast path only if the SPTE was * write-protected for dirty-logging or access tracking. */ - if (fault->write && - spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(spte)) { + if (fault->write && is_mmu_writable_spte(spte)) { new_spte |= PT_WRITABLE_MASK; /* diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h index e4abeb5df1b1..c571784cb567 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ static inline void check_spte_writable_invariants(u64 spte) "kvm: Writable SPTE is not MMU-writable: %llx", spte); } -static inline bool spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(u64 spte) +static inline bool is_mmu_writable_spte(u64 spte) { return spte & shadow_mmu_writable_mask; }

2 years, 8 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't treat fully writable SPTEs as volatile" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 706c9c55e5a32800605eb6a864ef6e1ca0c6c179 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc(a)google.com> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 03:47:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't treat fully writable SPTEs as volatile (modulo A/D) Don't treat SPTEs that are truly writable, i.e. writable in hardware, as being volatile (unless they're volatile for other reasons, e.g. A/D bits). KVM _sets_ the WRITABLE bit out of mmu_lock, but never _clears_ the bit out of mmu_lock, so if the WRITABLE bit is set, it cannot magically get cleared just because the SPTE is MMU-writable. Rename the wrapper of MMU-writable to be more literal, the previous name of spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable() is wrong and misleading. Fixes: c7ba5b48cc8d ("KVM: MMU: fast path of handling guest page fault") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc(a)google.com> Message-Id: <20220423034752.1161007-2-seanjc(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c index 64a2a7e2be90..48dcb6a782f4 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c @@ -484,13 +484,15 @@ static bool spte_has_volatile_bits(u64 spte) * also, it can help us to get a stable is_writable_pte() * to ensure tlb flush is not missed. */ - if (spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(spte) || - is_access_track_spte(spte)) + if (!is_writable_pte(spte) && is_mmu_writable_spte(spte)) + return true; + + if (is_access_track_spte(spte)) return true; if (spte_ad_enabled(spte)) { - if ((spte & shadow_accessed_mask) == 0 || - (is_writable_pte(spte) && (spte & shadow_dirty_mask) == 0)) + if (!(spte & shadow_accessed_mask) || + (is_writable_pte(spte) && !(spte & shadow_dirty_mask))) return true; } @@ -557,7 +559,7 @@ static bool mmu_spte_update(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte) * we always atomically update it, see the comments in * spte_has_volatile_bits(). */ - if (spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(old_spte) && + if (is_mmu_writable_spte(old_spte) && !is_writable_pte(new_spte)) flush = true; @@ -1187,7 +1189,7 @@ static bool spte_write_protect(u64 *sptep, bool pt_protect) u64 spte = *sptep; if (!is_writable_pte(spte) && - !(pt_protect && spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(spte))) + !(pt_protect && is_mmu_writable_spte(spte))) return false; rmap_printk("spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep); @@ -3196,8 +3198,7 @@ static int fast_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault) * be removed in the fast path only if the SPTE was * write-protected for dirty-logging or access tracking. */ - if (fault->write && - spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(spte)) { + if (fault->write && is_mmu_writable_spte(spte)) { new_spte |= PT_WRITABLE_MASK; /* diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h index e4abeb5df1b1..c571784cb567 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ static inline void check_spte_writable_invariants(u64 spte) "kvm: Writable SPTE is not MMU-writable: %llx", spte); } -static inline bool spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(u64 spte) +static inline bool is_mmu_writable_spte(u64 spte) { return spte & shadow_mmu_writable_mask; }

2 years, 8 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't treat fully writable SPTEs as volatile" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 706c9c55e5a32800605eb6a864ef6e1ca0c6c179 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc(a)google.com> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 03:47:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't treat fully writable SPTEs as volatile (modulo A/D) Don't treat SPTEs that are truly writable, i.e. writable in hardware, as being volatile (unless they're volatile for other reasons, e.g. A/D bits). KVM _sets_ the WRITABLE bit out of mmu_lock, but never _clears_ the bit out of mmu_lock, so if the WRITABLE bit is set, it cannot magically get cleared just because the SPTE is MMU-writable. Rename the wrapper of MMU-writable to be more literal, the previous name of spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable() is wrong and misleading. Fixes: c7ba5b48cc8d ("KVM: MMU: fast path of handling guest page fault") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc(a)google.com> Message-Id: <20220423034752.1161007-2-seanjc(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c index 64a2a7e2be90..48dcb6a782f4 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c @@ -484,13 +484,15 @@ static bool spte_has_volatile_bits(u64 spte) * also, it can help us to get a stable is_writable_pte() * to ensure tlb flush is not missed. */ - if (spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(spte) || - is_access_track_spte(spte)) + if (!is_writable_pte(spte) && is_mmu_writable_spte(spte)) + return true; + + if (is_access_track_spte(spte)) return true; if (spte_ad_enabled(spte)) { - if ((spte & shadow_accessed_mask) == 0 || - (is_writable_pte(spte) && (spte & shadow_dirty_mask) == 0)) + if (!(spte & shadow_accessed_mask) || + (is_writable_pte(spte) && !(spte & shadow_dirty_mask))) return true; } @@ -557,7 +559,7 @@ static bool mmu_spte_update(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte) * we always atomically update it, see the comments in * spte_has_volatile_bits(). */ - if (spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(old_spte) && + if (is_mmu_writable_spte(old_spte) && !is_writable_pte(new_spte)) flush = true; @@ -1187,7 +1189,7 @@ static bool spte_write_protect(u64 *sptep, bool pt_protect) u64 spte = *sptep; if (!is_writable_pte(spte) && - !(pt_protect && spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(spte))) + !(pt_protect && is_mmu_writable_spte(spte))) return false; rmap_printk("spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep); @@ -3196,8 +3198,7 @@ static int fast_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault) * be removed in the fast path only if the SPTE was * write-protected for dirty-logging or access tracking. */ - if (fault->write && - spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(spte)) { + if (fault->write && is_mmu_writable_spte(spte)) { new_spte |= PT_WRITABLE_MASK; /* diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h index e4abeb5df1b1..c571784cb567 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ static inline void check_spte_writable_invariants(u64 spte) "kvm: Writable SPTE is not MMU-writable: %llx", spte); } -static inline bool spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(u64 spte) +static inline bool is_mmu_writable_spte(u64 spte) { return spte & shadow_mmu_writable_mask; }

2 years, 8 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't treat fully writable SPTEs as volatile" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 706c9c55e5a32800605eb6a864ef6e1ca0c6c179 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc(a)google.com> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 03:47:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't treat fully writable SPTEs as volatile (modulo A/D) Don't treat SPTEs that are truly writable, i.e. writable in hardware, as being volatile (unless they're volatile for other reasons, e.g. A/D bits). KVM _sets_ the WRITABLE bit out of mmu_lock, but never _clears_ the bit out of mmu_lock, so if the WRITABLE bit is set, it cannot magically get cleared just because the SPTE is MMU-writable. Rename the wrapper of MMU-writable to be more literal, the previous name of spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable() is wrong and misleading. Fixes: c7ba5b48cc8d ("KVM: MMU: fast path of handling guest page fault") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc(a)google.com> Message-Id: <20220423034752.1161007-2-seanjc(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c index 64a2a7e2be90..48dcb6a782f4 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c @@ -484,13 +484,15 @@ static bool spte_has_volatile_bits(u64 spte) * also, it can help us to get a stable is_writable_pte() * to ensure tlb flush is not missed. */ - if (spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(spte) || - is_access_track_spte(spte)) + if (!is_writable_pte(spte) && is_mmu_writable_spte(spte)) + return true; + + if (is_access_track_spte(spte)) return true; if (spte_ad_enabled(spte)) { - if ((spte & shadow_accessed_mask) == 0 || - (is_writable_pte(spte) && (spte & shadow_dirty_mask) == 0)) + if (!(spte & shadow_accessed_mask) || + (is_writable_pte(spte) && !(spte & shadow_dirty_mask))) return true; } @@ -557,7 +559,7 @@ static bool mmu_spte_update(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte) * we always atomically update it, see the comments in * spte_has_volatile_bits(). */ - if (spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(old_spte) && + if (is_mmu_writable_spte(old_spte) && !is_writable_pte(new_spte)) flush = true; @@ -1187,7 +1189,7 @@ static bool spte_write_protect(u64 *sptep, bool pt_protect) u64 spte = *sptep; if (!is_writable_pte(spte) && - !(pt_protect && spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(spte))) + !(pt_protect && is_mmu_writable_spte(spte))) return false; rmap_printk("spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep); @@ -3196,8 +3198,7 @@ static int fast_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault) * be removed in the fast path only if the SPTE was * write-protected for dirty-logging or access tracking. */ - if (fault->write && - spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(spte)) { + if (fault->write && is_mmu_writable_spte(spte)) { new_spte |= PT_WRITABLE_MASK; /* diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h index e4abeb5df1b1..c571784cb567 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ static inline void check_spte_writable_invariants(u64 spte) "kvm: Writable SPTE is not MMU-writable: %llx", spte); } -static inline bool spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(u64 spte) +static inline bool is_mmu_writable_spte(u64 spte) { return spte & shadow_mmu_writable_mask; }

2 years, 8 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mmc: core: Set HS clock speed before sending HS CMD13" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 4bc31edebde51fcf8ad0794763b8679a7ecb5ec0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brian Norris <briannorris(a)chromium.org> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:08:53 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: Set HS clock speed before sending HS CMD13 Way back in commit 4f25580fb84d ("mmc: core: changes frequency to hs_max_dtr when selecting hs400es"), Rockchip engineers noticed that some eMMC don't respond to SEND_STATUS commands very reliably if they're still running at a low initial frequency. As mentioned in that commit, JESD84-B51 P49 suggests a sequence in which the host: 1. sets HS_TIMING 2. bumps the clock ("<= 52 MHz") 3. sends further commands It doesn't exactly require that we don't use a lower-than-52MHz frequency, but in practice, these eMMC don't like it. The aforementioned commit tried to get that right for HS400ES, although it's unclear whether this ever truly worked as committed into mainline, as other changes/refactoring adjusted the sequence in conflicting ways: 08573eaf1a70 ("mmc: mmc: do not use CMD13 to get status after speed mode switch") 53e60650f74e ("mmc: core: Allow CMD13 polling when switching to HS mode for mmc") In any case, today we do step 3 before step 2. Let's fix that, and also apply the same logic to HS200/400, where this eMMC has problems too. Resolves errors like this seen when booting some RK3399 Gru/Scarlet systems: [ 2.058881] mmc1: CQHCI version 5.10 [ 2.097545] mmc1: SDHCI controller on fe330000.mmc [fe330000.mmc] using ADMA [ 2.209804] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -84 [ 2.215597] mmc1: error -84 whilst initialising MMC card [ 2.417514] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -110 [ 2.423373] mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card [ 2.605052] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -110 [ 2.617944] mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card [ 2.835884] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -110 [ 2.841751] mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card Ealier versions of this patch bumped to 200MHz/HS200 speeds too early, which caused issues on, e.g., qcom-msm8974-fairphone-fp2. (Thanks for the report Luca!) After a second look, it appears that aligns with JESD84 / page 45 / table 28, so we need to keep to lower (HS / 52 MHz) rates first. Fixes: 08573eaf1a70 ("mmc: mmc: do not use CMD13 to get status after speed mode switch") Fixes: 53e60650f74e ("mmc: core: Allow CMD13 polling when switching to HS mode for mmc") Fixes: 4f25580fb84d ("mmc: core: changes frequency to hs_max_dtr when selecting hs400es") Cc: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin(a)rock-chips.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/11962455.O9o76ZdvQC@g550jk/ Reported-by: Luca Weiss <luca(a)z3ntu.xyz> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris(a)chromium.org> Tested-by: Luca Weiss <luca(a)z3ntu.xyz> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422100824.v4.1.I484f4ee35609f78b932bd50feed6… Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson(a)linaro.org> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c index e7ea45386c22..efa95dc4fc4e 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c @@ -1384,13 +1384,17 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400es(struct mmc_card *card) goto out_err; } + /* + * Bump to HS timing and frequency. Some cards don't handle + * SEND_STATUS reliably at the initial frequency. + */ mmc_set_timing(host, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS); + mmc_set_bus_speed(card); + err = mmc_switch_status(card, true); if (err) goto out_err; - mmc_set_clock(host, card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr); - /* Switch card to DDR with strobe bit */ val = EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8 | EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_STROBE; err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL, @@ -1448,7 +1452,7 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400es(struct mmc_card *card) static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_card *card) { struct mmc_host *host = card->host; - unsigned int old_timing, old_signal_voltage; + unsigned int old_timing, old_signal_voltage, old_clock; int err = -EINVAL; u8 val; @@ -1479,8 +1483,17 @@ static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_card *card) false, true, MMC_CMD_RETRIES); if (err) goto err; + + /* + * Bump to HS timing and frequency. Some cards don't handle + * SEND_STATUS reliably at the initial frequency. + * NB: We can't move to full (HS200) speeds until after we've + * successfully switched over. + */ old_timing = host->ios.timing; + old_clock = host->ios.clock; mmc_set_timing(host, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200); + mmc_set_clock(card->host, card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr); /* * For HS200, CRC errors are not a reliable way to know the @@ -1493,8 +1506,10 @@ static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_card *card) * mmc_select_timing() assumes timing has not changed if * it is a switch error. */ - if (err == -EBADMSG) + if (err == -EBADMSG) { + mmc_set_clock(host, old_clock); mmc_set_timing(host, old_timing); + } } err: if (err) {

2 years, 8 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mmc: core: Set HS clock speed before sending HS CMD13" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 4bc31edebde51fcf8ad0794763b8679a7ecb5ec0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brian Norris <briannorris(a)chromium.org> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:08:53 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: Set HS clock speed before sending HS CMD13 Way back in commit 4f25580fb84d ("mmc: core: changes frequency to hs_max_dtr when selecting hs400es"), Rockchip engineers noticed that some eMMC don't respond to SEND_STATUS commands very reliably if they're still running at a low initial frequency. As mentioned in that commit, JESD84-B51 P49 suggests a sequence in which the host: 1. sets HS_TIMING 2. bumps the clock ("<= 52 MHz") 3. sends further commands It doesn't exactly require that we don't use a lower-than-52MHz frequency, but in practice, these eMMC don't like it. The aforementioned commit tried to get that right for HS400ES, although it's unclear whether this ever truly worked as committed into mainline, as other changes/refactoring adjusted the sequence in conflicting ways: 08573eaf1a70 ("mmc: mmc: do not use CMD13 to get status after speed mode switch") 53e60650f74e ("mmc: core: Allow CMD13 polling when switching to HS mode for mmc") In any case, today we do step 3 before step 2. Let's fix that, and also apply the same logic to HS200/400, where this eMMC has problems too. Resolves errors like this seen when booting some RK3399 Gru/Scarlet systems: [ 2.058881] mmc1: CQHCI version 5.10 [ 2.097545] mmc1: SDHCI controller on fe330000.mmc [fe330000.mmc] using ADMA [ 2.209804] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -84 [ 2.215597] mmc1: error -84 whilst initialising MMC card [ 2.417514] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -110 [ 2.423373] mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card [ 2.605052] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -110 [ 2.617944] mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card [ 2.835884] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -110 [ 2.841751] mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card Ealier versions of this patch bumped to 200MHz/HS200 speeds too early, which caused issues on, e.g., qcom-msm8974-fairphone-fp2. (Thanks for the report Luca!) After a second look, it appears that aligns with JESD84 / page 45 / table 28, so we need to keep to lower (HS / 52 MHz) rates first. Fixes: 08573eaf1a70 ("mmc: mmc: do not use CMD13 to get status after speed mode switch") Fixes: 53e60650f74e ("mmc: core: Allow CMD13 polling when switching to HS mode for mmc") Fixes: 4f25580fb84d ("mmc: core: changes frequency to hs_max_dtr when selecting hs400es") Cc: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin(a)rock-chips.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/11962455.O9o76ZdvQC@g550jk/ Reported-by: Luca Weiss <luca(a)z3ntu.xyz> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris(a)chromium.org> Tested-by: Luca Weiss <luca(a)z3ntu.xyz> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422100824.v4.1.I484f4ee35609f78b932bd50feed6… Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson(a)linaro.org> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c index e7ea45386c22..efa95dc4fc4e 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c @@ -1384,13 +1384,17 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400es(struct mmc_card *card) goto out_err; } + /* + * Bump to HS timing and frequency. Some cards don't handle + * SEND_STATUS reliably at the initial frequency. + */ mmc_set_timing(host, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS); + mmc_set_bus_speed(card); + err = mmc_switch_status(card, true); if (err) goto out_err; - mmc_set_clock(host, card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr); - /* Switch card to DDR with strobe bit */ val = EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8 | EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_STROBE; err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL, @@ -1448,7 +1452,7 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400es(struct mmc_card *card) static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_card *card) { struct mmc_host *host = card->host; - unsigned int old_timing, old_signal_voltage; + unsigned int old_timing, old_signal_voltage, old_clock; int err = -EINVAL; u8 val; @@ -1479,8 +1483,17 @@ static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_card *card) false, true, MMC_CMD_RETRIES); if (err) goto err; + + /* + * Bump to HS timing and frequency. Some cards don't handle + * SEND_STATUS reliably at the initial frequency. + * NB: We can't move to full (HS200) speeds until after we've + * successfully switched over. + */ old_timing = host->ios.timing; + old_clock = host->ios.clock; mmc_set_timing(host, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200); + mmc_set_clock(card->host, card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr); /* * For HS200, CRC errors are not a reliable way to know the @@ -1493,8 +1506,10 @@ static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_card *card) * mmc_select_timing() assumes timing has not changed if * it is a switch error. */ - if (err == -EBADMSG) + if (err == -EBADMSG) { + mmc_set_clock(host, old_clock); mmc_set_timing(host, old_timing); + } } err: if (err) {

2 years, 8 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mmc: core: Set HS clock speed before sending HS CMD13" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 4bc31edebde51fcf8ad0794763b8679a7ecb5ec0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brian Norris <briannorris(a)chromium.org> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:08:53 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: Set HS clock speed before sending HS CMD13 Way back in commit 4f25580fb84d ("mmc: core: changes frequency to hs_max_dtr when selecting hs400es"), Rockchip engineers noticed that some eMMC don't respond to SEND_STATUS commands very reliably if they're still running at a low initial frequency. As mentioned in that commit, JESD84-B51 P49 suggests a sequence in which the host: 1. sets HS_TIMING 2. bumps the clock ("<= 52 MHz") 3. sends further commands It doesn't exactly require that we don't use a lower-than-52MHz frequency, but in practice, these eMMC don't like it. The aforementioned commit tried to get that right for HS400ES, although it's unclear whether this ever truly worked as committed into mainline, as other changes/refactoring adjusted the sequence in conflicting ways: 08573eaf1a70 ("mmc: mmc: do not use CMD13 to get status after speed mode switch") 53e60650f74e ("mmc: core: Allow CMD13 polling when switching to HS mode for mmc") In any case, today we do step 3 before step 2. Let's fix that, and also apply the same logic to HS200/400, where this eMMC has problems too. Resolves errors like this seen when booting some RK3399 Gru/Scarlet systems: [ 2.058881] mmc1: CQHCI version 5.10 [ 2.097545] mmc1: SDHCI controller on fe330000.mmc [fe330000.mmc] using ADMA [ 2.209804] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -84 [ 2.215597] mmc1: error -84 whilst initialising MMC card [ 2.417514] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -110 [ 2.423373] mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card [ 2.605052] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -110 [ 2.617944] mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card [ 2.835884] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -110 [ 2.841751] mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card Ealier versions of this patch bumped to 200MHz/HS200 speeds too early, which caused issues on, e.g., qcom-msm8974-fairphone-fp2. (Thanks for the report Luca!) After a second look, it appears that aligns with JESD84 / page 45 / table 28, so we need to keep to lower (HS / 52 MHz) rates first. Fixes: 08573eaf1a70 ("mmc: mmc: do not use CMD13 to get status after speed mode switch") Fixes: 53e60650f74e ("mmc: core: Allow CMD13 polling when switching to HS mode for mmc") Fixes: 4f25580fb84d ("mmc: core: changes frequency to hs_max_dtr when selecting hs400es") Cc: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin(a)rock-chips.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/11962455.O9o76ZdvQC@g550jk/ Reported-by: Luca Weiss <luca(a)z3ntu.xyz> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris(a)chromium.org> Tested-by: Luca Weiss <luca(a)z3ntu.xyz> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422100824.v4.1.I484f4ee35609f78b932bd50feed6… Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson(a)linaro.org> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c index e7ea45386c22..efa95dc4fc4e 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c @@ -1384,13 +1384,17 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400es(struct mmc_card *card) goto out_err; } + /* + * Bump to HS timing and frequency. Some cards don't handle + * SEND_STATUS reliably at the initial frequency. + */ mmc_set_timing(host, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS); + mmc_set_bus_speed(card); + err = mmc_switch_status(card, true); if (err) goto out_err; - mmc_set_clock(host, card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr); - /* Switch card to DDR with strobe bit */ val = EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8 | EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_STROBE; err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL, @@ -1448,7 +1452,7 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400es(struct mmc_card *card) static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_card *card) { struct mmc_host *host = card->host; - unsigned int old_timing, old_signal_voltage; + unsigned int old_timing, old_signal_voltage, old_clock; int err = -EINVAL; u8 val; @@ -1479,8 +1483,17 @@ static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_card *card) false, true, MMC_CMD_RETRIES); if (err) goto err; + + /* + * Bump to HS timing and frequency. Some cards don't handle + * SEND_STATUS reliably at the initial frequency. + * NB: We can't move to full (HS200) speeds until after we've + * successfully switched over. + */ old_timing = host->ios.timing; + old_clock = host->ios.clock; mmc_set_timing(host, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200); + mmc_set_clock(card->host, card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr); /* * For HS200, CRC errors are not a reliable way to know the @@ -1493,8 +1506,10 @@ static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_card *card) * mmc_select_timing() assumes timing has not changed if * it is a switch error. */ - if (err == -EBADMSG) + if (err == -EBADMSG) { + mmc_set_clock(host, old_clock); mmc_set_timing(host, old_timing); + } } err: if (err) {

2 years, 8 months

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mmc: core: Set HS clock speed before sending HS CMD13" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 4bc31edebde51fcf8ad0794763b8679a7ecb5ec0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brian Norris <briannorris(a)chromium.org> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:08:53 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: Set HS clock speed before sending HS CMD13 Way back in commit 4f25580fb84d ("mmc: core: changes frequency to hs_max_dtr when selecting hs400es"), Rockchip engineers noticed that some eMMC don't respond to SEND_STATUS commands very reliably if they're still running at a low initial frequency. As mentioned in that commit, JESD84-B51 P49 suggests a sequence in which the host: 1. sets HS_TIMING 2. bumps the clock ("<= 52 MHz") 3. sends further commands It doesn't exactly require that we don't use a lower-than-52MHz frequency, but in practice, these eMMC don't like it. The aforementioned commit tried to get that right for HS400ES, although it's unclear whether this ever truly worked as committed into mainline, as other changes/refactoring adjusted the sequence in conflicting ways: 08573eaf1a70 ("mmc: mmc: do not use CMD13 to get status after speed mode switch") 53e60650f74e ("mmc: core: Allow CMD13 polling when switching to HS mode for mmc") In any case, today we do step 3 before step 2. Let's fix that, and also apply the same logic to HS200/400, where this eMMC has problems too. Resolves errors like this seen when booting some RK3399 Gru/Scarlet systems: [ 2.058881] mmc1: CQHCI version 5.10 [ 2.097545] mmc1: SDHCI controller on fe330000.mmc [fe330000.mmc] using ADMA [ 2.209804] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -84 [ 2.215597] mmc1: error -84 whilst initialising MMC card [ 2.417514] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -110 [ 2.423373] mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card [ 2.605052] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -110 [ 2.617944] mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card [ 2.835884] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -110 [ 2.841751] mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card Ealier versions of this patch bumped to 200MHz/HS200 speeds too early, which caused issues on, e.g., qcom-msm8974-fairphone-fp2. (Thanks for the report Luca!) After a second look, it appears that aligns with JESD84 / page 45 / table 28, so we need to keep to lower (HS / 52 MHz) rates first. Fixes: 08573eaf1a70 ("mmc: mmc: do not use CMD13 to get status after speed mode switch") Fixes: 53e60650f74e ("mmc: core: Allow CMD13 polling when switching to HS mode for mmc") Fixes: 4f25580fb84d ("mmc: core: changes frequency to hs_max_dtr when selecting hs400es") Cc: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin(a)rock-chips.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/11962455.O9o76ZdvQC@g550jk/ Reported-by: Luca Weiss <luca(a)z3ntu.xyz> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris(a)chromium.org> Tested-by: Luca Weiss <luca(a)z3ntu.xyz> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422100824.v4.1.I484f4ee35609f78b932bd50feed6… Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson(a)linaro.org> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c index e7ea45386c22..efa95dc4fc4e 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c @@ -1384,13 +1384,17 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400es(struct mmc_card *card) goto out_err; } + /* + * Bump to HS timing and frequency. Some cards don't handle + * SEND_STATUS reliably at the initial frequency. + */ mmc_set_timing(host, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS); + mmc_set_bus_speed(card); + err = mmc_switch_status(card, true); if (err) goto out_err; - mmc_set_clock(host, card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr); - /* Switch card to DDR with strobe bit */ val = EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8 | EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_STROBE; err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL, @@ -1448,7 +1452,7 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400es(struct mmc_card *card) static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_card *card) { struct mmc_host *host = card->host; - unsigned int old_timing, old_signal_voltage; + unsigned int old_timing, old_signal_voltage, old_clock; int err = -EINVAL; u8 val; @@ -1479,8 +1483,17 @@ static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_card *card) false, true, MMC_CMD_RETRIES); if (err) goto err; + + /* + * Bump to HS timing and frequency. Some cards don't handle + * SEND_STATUS reliably at the initial frequency. + * NB: We can't move to full (HS200) speeds until after we've + * successfully switched over. + */ old_timing = host->ios.timing; + old_clock = host->ios.clock; mmc_set_timing(host, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200); + mmc_set_clock(card->host, card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr); /* * For HS200, CRC errors are not a reliable way to know the @@ -1493,8 +1506,10 @@ static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_card *card) * mmc_select_timing() assumes timing has not changed if * it is a switch error. */ - if (err == -EBADMSG) + if (err == -EBADMSG) { + mmc_set_clock(host, old_clock); mmc_set_timing(host, old_timing); + } } err: if (err) {

2 years, 8 months

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror May 2022