Submit the top-level headers also from the kunit test module notifier initialization callback, so external tools that are parsing dmesg for kunit test output are able to tell how many test suites should be expected and whether to continue parsing after complete output from the first test suite is collected.
Extend kunit module notifier initialization callback with a processing path for only listing the tests provided by a module if the kunit action parameter is set to "list", so external tools can obtain a list of test cases to be executed in advance and can make a better job on assigning kernel messages interleaved with kunit output to specific tests.
Use test filtering functions in kunit module notifier callback functions, so external tools are able to execute individual test cases from kunit test modules in order to still better isolate their potential impact on kernel messages that appear interleaved with output from other tests.
Janusz Krzysztofik (3): kunit: Report the count of test suites in a module kunit: Make 'list' action available to kunit test modules kunit: Allow kunit test modules to use test filtering
include/kunit/test.h | 14 +++++++++++ lib/kunit/executor.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- lib/kunit/test.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
According to KTAP specification[1], results should always start from a header that provides a TAP protocol version, followed by a test plan with a count of items to be executed. That pattern should be followed at each nesting level. In the current implementation of the top-most, i.e., test suite level, those rules apply only for test suites built into the kernel, executed and reported on boot. Results submitted to dmesg from kunit test modules loaded later are missing those top-level headers.
As a consequence, if a kunit test module provides more than one test suite then, without the top level test plan, external tools that are parsing dmesg for kunit test output are not able to tell how many test suites should be expected and whether to continue parsing after complete output from the first test suite is collected.
Submit the top-level headers also from the kunit test module notifier initialization callback.
[1] https://docs.kernel.org/dev-tools/ktap.html#
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com --- lib/kunit/test.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index 84e4666555c94..a29ca1acc4d81 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -729,6 +729,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_test_suites_exit); #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES static void kunit_module_init(struct module *mod) { + if (mod->num_kunit_suites > 0) { + pr_info("KTAP version 1\n"); + pr_info("1..%d\n", mod->num_kunit_suites); + } + __kunit_test_suites_init(mod->kunit_suites, mod->num_kunit_suites); }
Results from kunit tests reported via dmesg may be interleaved with other kernel messages. When parsing dmesg for modular kunit results in real time, external tools, e.g., Intel GPU tools (IGT), may want to insert their own test name markers into dmesg at the start of each test, before any kernel message related to that test appears there, so existing upper level test result parsers have no doubt which test to blame for a specific kernel message. Unfortunately, kunit reports names of tests only at their completion (with the exeption of a not standarized "# Subtest: <name>" header above a test plan of each test suite or parametrized test).
External tools could be able to insert their own "start of the test" markers with test names included if they new those names in advance. Test names could be learned from a list if provided by a kunit test module.
There exists a feature of listing kunit tests without actually executing them, but it is now limited to configurations with the kunit module built in and covers only built-in tests, already available at boot time. Moreover, switching from list to normal mode requires reboot. If that feature was also available when kunit is built as a module, userspace could load the module with action=list parameter, load some kunit test modules they are interested in and learn about the list of tests provided by those modules, then unload them, reload the kunit module in normal mode and execute the tests with their lists already known.
Extend kunit module notifier initialization callback with a processing path for only listing the tests provided by a module if the kunit action parameter is set to "list". For ease of use, submit the list in the format of a standard KTAP report, with SKIP result from each test case, giving "list mode" as the reason for skipping. For each test suite provided by a kunit test module, make such list of its test cases also available via kunit debugfs for the lifetime of the module. For user convenience, make the kunit.action parameter visible in sysfs.
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com --- include/kunit/test.h | 1 + lib/kunit/executor.c | 19 +++++++++++++------ lib/kunit/test.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 23120d50499ef..6d693f21a4833 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -237,6 +237,7 @@ static inline void kunit_set_failure(struct kunit *test) }
bool kunit_enabled(void); +const char *kunit_action(void);
void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, char *log);
diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c index 74982b83707ca..d1c0616569dfd 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -12,19 +12,26 @@ extern struct kunit_suite * const __kunit_suites_start[]; extern struct kunit_suite * const __kunit_suites_end[];
+static char *action_param; + +module_param_named(action, action_param, charp, 0400); +MODULE_PARM_DESC(action, + "Changes KUnit executor behavior, valid values are:\n" + "<none>: run the tests like normal\n" + "'list' to list test names instead of running them.\n"); + +const char *kunit_action(void) +{ + return action_param; +} + #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT)
static char *filter_glob_param; -static char *action_param;
module_param_named(filter_glob, filter_glob_param, charp, 0); MODULE_PARM_DESC(filter_glob, "Filter which KUnit test suites/tests run at boot-time, e.g. list* or list*.*del_test"); -module_param_named(action, action_param, charp, 0); -MODULE_PARM_DESC(action, - "Changes KUnit executor behavior, valid values are:\n" - "<none>: run the tests like normal\n" - "'list' to list test names instead of running them.\n");
/* glob_match() needs NULL terminated strings, so we need a copy of filter_glob_param. */ struct kunit_test_filter { diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index a29ca1acc4d81..413d9fd364a8d 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -674,6 +674,27 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_run_tests);
+static void kunit_list_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite) +{ + struct kunit_case *test_case; + + kunit_print_suite_start(suite); + + kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) { + struct kunit test = { .param_value = NULL, .param_index = 0 }; + + kunit_init_test(&test, test_case->name, test_case->log); + + kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, true, KUNIT_SKIPPED, + kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case), + test_case->name, "list mode"); + } + + kunit_print_ok_not_ok((void *)suite, false, KUNIT_SKIPPED, + kunit_suite_counter++, + suite->name, "list mode"); +} + static void kunit_init_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite) { kunit_debugfs_create_suite(suite); @@ -688,6 +709,7 @@ bool kunit_enabled(void)
int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites, int num_suites) { + const char *action = kunit_action(); unsigned int i;
if (!kunit_enabled() && num_suites > 0) { @@ -699,7 +721,13 @@ int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites, int num_
for (i = 0; i < num_suites; i++) { kunit_init_suite(suites[i]); - kunit_run_tests(suites[i]); + + if (!action) + kunit_run_tests(suites[i]); + else if (!strcmp(action, "list")) + kunit_list_suite(suites[i]); + else + pr_err("kunit: unknown action '%s'\n", action); }
static_branch_dec(&kunit_running);
External tools, e.g., Intel GPU tools (IGT), support execution of individual selftests provided by kernel modules. That could be also applicable to kunit test modules if they provided test filtering. But test filtering is now possible only when kunit code is built into the kernel. Moreover, a filter can be specified only at boot time, then reboot is required each time a different filter is needed.
Build the test filtering code also when kunit is configured as a module, expose test filtering functions to other kunit source files, and use them in kunit module notifier callback functions. Userspace can then reload the kunit module with a value of the filter_glob parameter tuned to a specific kunit test module every time it wants to limit the scope of tests executed on that module load. Make the kunit.filter_glob parameter visible in sysfs for user convenience.
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com --- include/kunit/test.h | 13 +++++++++++++ lib/kunit/executor.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ lib/kunit/test.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 6d693f21a4833..14ff12e72252a 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -190,6 +190,12 @@ struct kunit_suite { int suite_init_err; };
+/* Stores an array of suites, end points one past the end */ +struct kunit_suite_set { + struct kunit_suite * const *start; + struct kunit_suite * const *end; +}; + /** * struct kunit - represents a running instance of a test. * @@ -238,6 +244,7 @@ static inline void kunit_set_failure(struct kunit *test)
bool kunit_enabled(void); const char *kunit_action(void); +const char *kunit_filter_glob(void);
void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, char *log);
@@ -248,6 +255,12 @@ size_t kunit_suite_num_test_cases(struct kunit_suite *suite); unsigned int kunit_test_case_num(struct kunit_suite *suite, struct kunit_case *test_case);
+struct kunit_suite_set +kunit_filter_suites(const struct kunit_suite_set *suite_set, + const char *filter_glob, + int *err); +void kunit_free_suite_set(struct kunit_suite_set suite_set); + int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites, int num_suites);
void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites, int num_suites); diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c index d1c0616569dfd..816e14f4fcb64 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -25,14 +25,17 @@ const char *kunit_action(void) return action_param; }
-#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) - static char *filter_glob_param;
-module_param_named(filter_glob, filter_glob_param, charp, 0); +module_param_named(filter_glob, filter_glob_param, charp, 0400); MODULE_PARM_DESC(filter_glob, "Filter which KUnit test suites/tests run at boot-time, e.g. list* or list*.*del_test");
+const char *kunit_filter_glob(void) +{ + return filter_glob_param; +} + /* glob_match() needs NULL terminated strings, so we need a copy of filter_glob_param. */ struct kunit_test_filter { char *suite_glob; @@ -96,16 +99,7 @@ kunit_filter_tests(const struct kunit_suite *const suite, const char *test_glob) return copy; }
-static char *kunit_shutdown; -core_param(kunit_shutdown, kunit_shutdown, charp, 0644); - -/* Stores an array of suites, end points one past the end */ -struct suite_set { - struct kunit_suite * const *start; - struct kunit_suite * const *end; -}; - -static void kunit_free_suite_set(struct suite_set suite_set) +void kunit_free_suite_set(struct kunit_suite_set suite_set) { struct kunit_suite * const *suites;
@@ -114,13 +108,14 @@ static void kunit_free_suite_set(struct suite_set suite_set) kfree(suite_set.start); }
-static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set, - const char *filter_glob, - int *err) +struct kunit_suite_set +kunit_filter_suites(const struct kunit_suite_set *suite_set, + const char *filter_glob, + int *err) { int i; struct kunit_suite **copy, *filtered_suite; - struct suite_set filtered; + struct kunit_suite_set filtered; struct kunit_test_filter filter;
const size_t max = suite_set->end - suite_set->start; @@ -155,6 +150,11 @@ static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set, return filtered; }
+#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) + +static char *kunit_shutdown; +core_param(kunit_shutdown, kunit_shutdown, charp, 0644); + static void kunit_handle_shutdown(void) { if (!kunit_shutdown) @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static void kunit_handle_shutdown(void)
}
-static void kunit_exec_run_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) +static void kunit_exec_run_tests(struct kunit_suite_set *suite_set) { size_t num_suites = suite_set->end - suite_set->start;
diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index 413d9fd364a8d..bfc2f65bd1dae 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -757,6 +757,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_test_suites_exit); #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES static void kunit_module_init(struct module *mod) { + struct kunit_suite_set suite_set = { + mod->kunit_suites, mod->kunit_suites + mod->num_kunit_suites, + }; + int err = 0; + + suite_set = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, + kunit_filter_glob() ?: "*.*", &err); + if (err) { + pr_err("kunit module: error filtering suites: %d\n", + err); + kfree(suite_set.start); + suite_set.start = NULL; + } + mod->kunit_suites = (struct kunit_suite **)suite_set.start; + mod->num_kunit_suites = suite_set.end - suite_set.start; + if (mod->num_kunit_suites > 0) { pr_info("KTAP version 1\n"); pr_info("1..%d\n", mod->num_kunit_suites); @@ -767,7 +783,13 @@ static void kunit_module_init(struct module *mod)
static void kunit_module_exit(struct module *mod) { + struct kunit_suite_set suite_set = { + mod->kunit_suites, mod->kunit_suites + mod->num_kunit_suites, + }; + __kunit_test_suites_exit(mod->kunit_suites, mod->num_kunit_suites); + if (suite_set.start) + kunit_free_suite_set(suite_set); }
static int kunit_module_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
Hi Janusz,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on shuah-kselftest/kunit-fixes] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.5-rc3] [cannot apply to shuah-kselftest/kunit next-20230728] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Janusz-Krzysztofik/kunit-Repo... base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git kunit-fixes patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230728154419.1810177-8-janusz.krzysztofik%40linu... patch subject: [PATCH 3/3] kunit: Allow kunit test modules to use test filtering config: hexagon-randconfig-r045-20230728 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230729/202307290124.BnnhRy8b-lkp@i...) compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a) reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230729/202307290124.BnnhRy8b-lkp@i...)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307290124.BnnhRy8b-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
lib/kunit/executor.c:182:42: warning: declaration of 'struct suite_set' will not be visible outside of this function [-Wvisibility]
182 | static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) | ^ lib/kunit/executor.c:190:25: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct suite_set' 190 | for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) | ~~~~~~~~~^ lib/kunit/executor.c:182:42: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 182 | static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) | ^ lib/kunit/executor.c:190:52: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct suite_set' 190 | for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) | ~~~~~~~~~^ lib/kunit/executor.c:182:42: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 182 | static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) | ^ lib/kunit/executor.c:198:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set' 198 | struct suite_set suite_set = {__kunit_suites_start, __kunit_suites_end}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor.c:198:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 198 | struct suite_set suite_set = {__kunit_suites_start, __kunit_suites_end}; | ^ In file included from lib/kunit/executor.c:230: lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set' 45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:46:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set' 46 | struct suite_set got; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set' 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:70:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set' 70 | struct suite_set got; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:96:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set' 96 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:96:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 96 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:97:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set' 97 | struct suite_set got; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:96:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 96 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:138:4: warning: cast from 'void (*)(const void *)' to 'kunit_action_t *' (aka 'void (*)(void *)') converts to incompatible function type [-Wcast-function-type-strict] 138 | (kunit_action_t *)kfree, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2 warnings and 9 errors generated.
vim +182 lib/kunit/executor.c
9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 181 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 @182 static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 183 { e5857d396f35e5 Daniel Latypov 2022-07-09 184 struct kunit_suite * const *suites; 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 185 struct kunit_case *test_case; 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 186 6c738b52316c58 Rae Moar 2022-11-23 187 /* Hack: print a ktap header so kunit.py can find the start of KUnit output. */ 6c738b52316c58 Rae Moar 2022-11-23 188 pr_info("KTAP version 1\n"); 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 189 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 190 for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) e5857d396f35e5 Daniel Latypov 2022-07-09 191 kunit_suite_for_each_test_case((*suites), test_case) { e5857d396f35e5 Daniel Latypov 2022-07-09 192 pr_info("%s.%s\n", (*suites)->name, test_case->name); 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 193 } 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 194 } 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 195
On Friday, 28 July 2023 19:24:55 CEST kernel test robot wrote:
lib/kunit/executor.c:182:42: warning: declaration of 'struct suite_set'
will not be visible outside of this function [-Wvisibility]
182 | static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) | ^
I've apparently broken this patch while reordering patches in the series. Sorry for submitting that untested. Please expect v2 soon.
Thanks, Janusz
Hi Janusz,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on shuah-kselftest/kunit-fixes] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.5-rc3] [cannot apply to shuah-kselftest/kunit next-20230728] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Janusz-Krzysztofik/kunit-Repo... base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git kunit-fixes patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230728154419.1810177-8-janusz.krzysztofik%40linu... patch subject: [PATCH 3/3] kunit: Allow kunit test modules to use test filtering config: arc-randconfig-r043-20230728 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230729/202307290108.PShSxJaM-lkp@i...) compiler: arc-elf-gcc (GCC) 12.3.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230729/202307290108.PShSxJaM-lkp@i...)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307290108.PShSxJaM-lkp@intel.com/
All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
lib/kunit/executor.c:182:42: warning: 'struct suite_set' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration
182 | static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) | ^~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor.c: In function 'kunit_exec_list_tests':
lib/kunit/executor.c:190:32: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct suite_set'
190 | for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) | ^~ lib/kunit/executor.c:190:59: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct suite_set' 190 | for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) | ^~ lib/kunit/executor.c: In function 'kunit_run_all_tests':
lib/kunit/executor.c:198:16: error: variable 'suite_set' has initializer but incomplete type
198 | struct suite_set suite_set = {__kunit_suites_start, __kunit_suites_end}; | ^~~~~~~~~
lib/kunit/executor.c:198:39: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
198 | struct suite_set suite_set = {__kunit_suites_start, __kunit_suites_end}; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor.c:198:39: note: (near initialization for 'suite_set') lib/kunit/executor.c:198:61: warning: excess elements in struct initializer 198 | struct suite_set suite_set = {__kunit_suites_start, __kunit_suites_end}; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor.c:198:61: note: (near initialization for 'suite_set')
lib/kunit/executor.c:198:26: error: storage size of 'suite_set' isn't known
198 | struct suite_set suite_set = {__kunit_suites_start, __kunit_suites_end}; | ^~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor.c:198:26: warning: unused variable 'suite_set' [-Wunused-variable] In file included from lib/kunit/executor.c:230: lib/kunit/executor_test.c: In function 'filter_suites_test':
lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:16: error: variable 'suite_set' has initializer but incomplete type
45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~~~~~
lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:40: error: 'struct suite_set' has no member named 'start'
45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~
lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:48: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:48: note: (near initialization for 'suite_set')
lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:59: error: 'struct suite_set' has no member named 'end'
45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:65: warning: excess elements in struct initializer 45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:65: note: (near initialization for 'suite_set')
lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:26: error: storage size of 'suite_set' isn't known
45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~~~~~
lib/kunit/executor_test.c:46:26: error: storage size of 'got' isn't known
46 | struct suite_set got; | ^~~ In file included from lib/kunit/executor.c:4:
include/kunit/test.h:737:29: warning: passing argument 1 of 'IS_ERR_OR_NULL' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
737 | if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__ptr)) \ | ^~~~~ | | | int include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:54:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 54 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/rwsem.h:17, from include/linux/notifier.h:15, from include/linux/reboot.h:6, from lib/kunit/executor.c:3: include/linux/err.h:70:68: note: expected 'const void *' but argument is of type 'int' 70 | static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__force const void *ptr) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
include/kunit/test.h:744:64: warning: initialization of 'const void *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:510:49: note: in definition of macro '_KUNIT_FAILED' 510 | const struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:23: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT' 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:54:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 54 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:64: note: (near initialization for '__assertion.value') 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:510:49: note: in definition of macro '_KUNIT_FAILED' 510 | const struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:23: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT' 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:54:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 54 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:737:29: warning: passing argument 1 of 'IS_ERR_OR_NULL' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
737 | if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__ptr)) \ | ^~~~~ | | | int include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:59:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 59 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/err.h:70:68: note: expected 'const void *' but argument is of type 'int' 70 | static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__force const void *ptr) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
include/kunit/test.h:744:64: warning: initialization of 'const void *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:510:49: note: in definition of macro '_KUNIT_FAILED' 510 | const struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:23: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT' 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:59:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 59 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:64: note: (near initialization for '__assertion.value') 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:510:49: note: in definition of macro '_KUNIT_FAILED' 510 | const struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:23: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT' 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:59:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 59 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:46:26: warning: unused variable 'got' [-Wunused-variable] 46 | struct suite_set got; | ^~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:26: warning: unused variable 'suite_set' [-Wunused-variable] 45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c: In function 'filter_suites_test_glob_test': lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:16: error: variable 'suite_set' has initializer but incomplete type 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:40: error: 'struct suite_set' has no member named 'start' 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:48: warning: excess elements in struct initializer 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:48: note: (near initialization for 'suite_set') lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:59: error: 'struct suite_set' has no member named 'end' 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:65: warning: excess elements in struct initializer 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:65: note: (near initialization for 'suite_set') lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:26: error: storage size of 'suite_set' isn't known 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:70:26: error: storage size of 'got' isn't known 70 | struct suite_set got; | ^~~
include/kunit/test.h:737:29: warning: passing argument 1 of 'IS_ERR_OR_NULL' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
737 | if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__ptr)) \ | ^~~~~ | | | int include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:78:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 78 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/err.h:70:68: note: expected 'const void *' but argument is of type 'int' 70 | static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__force const void *ptr) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
include/kunit/test.h:744:64: warning: initialization of 'const void *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:510:49: note: in definition of macro '_KUNIT_FAILED' 510 | const struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:23: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT' 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:78:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 78 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:64: note: (near initialization for '__assertion.value') 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:510:49: note: in definition of macro '_KUNIT_FAILED' 510 | const struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:23: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT' 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:78:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 78 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:737:29: warning: passing argument 1 of 'IS_ERR_OR_NULL' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
737 | if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__ptr)) \ | ^~~~~ | | | int include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:83:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 83 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/err.h:70:68: note: expected 'const void *' but argument is of type 'int' 70 | static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__force const void *ptr) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
include/kunit/test.h:744:64: warning: initialization of 'const void *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:510:49: note: in definition of macro '_KUNIT_FAILED' 510 | const struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:23: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT' 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:83:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 83 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:64: note: (near initialization for '__assertion.value') 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:510:49: note: in definition of macro '_KUNIT_FAILED' 510 | const struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:23: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT' 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:83:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 83 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:737:29: warning: passing argument 1 of 'IS_ERR_OR_NULL' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
737 | if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__ptr)) \ | ^~~~~ | | | int include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:88:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 88 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]->test_cases); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/err.h:70:68: note: expected 'const void *' but argument is of type 'int' 70 | static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__force const void *ptr) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:64: warning: initialization of 'const void *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:510:49: note: in definition of macro '_KUNIT_FAILED' 510 | const struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:23: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT' 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:88:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 88 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]->test_cases); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:64: note: (near initialization for '__assertion.value') 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:510:49: note: in definition of macro '_KUNIT_FAILED' 510 | const struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:23: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT' 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:88:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 88 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]->test_cases); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:70:26: warning: unused variable 'got' [-Wunused-variable] 70 | struct suite_set got; | ^~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:26: warning: unused variable 'suite_set' [-Wunused-variable] 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c: In function 'filter_suites_to_empty_test': lib/kunit/executor_test.c:96:16: error: variable 'suite_set' has initializer but incomplete type 96 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:96:40: error: 'struct suite_set' has no member named 'start' 96 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:96:48: warning: excess elements in struct initializer 96 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:96:48: note: (near initialization for 'suite_set') lib/kunit/executor_test.c:96:59: error: 'struct suite_set' has no member named 'end' 96 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:96:65: warning: excess elements in struct initializer 96 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:96:65: note: (near initialization for 'suite_set') lib/kunit/executor_test.c:96:26: error: storage size of 'suite_set' isn't known 96 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:97:26: error: storage size of 'got' isn't known 97 | struct suite_set got; | ^~~ include/kunit/test.h:628:55: warning: initialization of 'const void *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] 628 | .left_value = __left, \ | ^~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:510:49: note: in definition of macro '_KUNIT_FAILED' 510 | const struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:627:23: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT' 627 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = &__text, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:656:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION' 656 | KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:825:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_PTR_ASSERTION' 825 | KUNIT_BINARY_PTR_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:107:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG' 107 | KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, got.start, got.end, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +190 lib/kunit/executor.c
9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 181 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 @182 static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 183 { e5857d396f35e5 Daniel Latypov 2022-07-09 184 struct kunit_suite * const *suites; 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 185 struct kunit_case *test_case; 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 186 6c738b52316c58 Rae Moar 2022-11-23 187 /* Hack: print a ktap header so kunit.py can find the start of KUnit output. */ 6c738b52316c58 Rae Moar 2022-11-23 188 pr_info("KTAP version 1\n"); 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 189 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 @190 for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) e5857d396f35e5 Daniel Latypov 2022-07-09 191 kunit_suite_for_each_test_case((*suites), test_case) { e5857d396f35e5 Daniel Latypov 2022-07-09 192 pr_info("%s.%s\n", (*suites)->name, test_case->name); 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 193 } 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 194 } 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 195 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 196 int kunit_run_all_tests(void) 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 197 { e5857d396f35e5 Daniel Latypov 2022-07-09 @198 struct suite_set suite_set = {__kunit_suites_start, __kunit_suites_end}; 1b11063d32d7e1 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-13 199 int err = 0; d20a6ba5e3be5f Joe Fradley 2022-08-23 200 if (!kunit_enabled()) { d20a6ba5e3be5f Joe Fradley 2022-08-23 201 pr_info("kunit: disabled\n"); d20a6ba5e3be5f Joe Fradley 2022-08-23 202 goto out; d20a6ba5e3be5f Joe Fradley 2022-08-23 203 } aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 204 a02353f491622e Daniel Latypov 2022-05-11 205 if (filter_glob_param) { a02353f491622e Daniel Latypov 2022-05-11 206 suite_set = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, filter_glob_param, &err); a02353f491622e Daniel Latypov 2022-05-11 207 if (err) { a02353f491622e Daniel Latypov 2022-05-11 208 pr_err("kunit executor: error filtering suites: %d\n", err); 1b11063d32d7e1 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-13 209 goto out; a02353f491622e Daniel Latypov 2022-05-11 210 } a02353f491622e Daniel Latypov 2022-05-11 211 } 45dcbb6f5ef78b Brendan Higgins 2020-08-04 212 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 213 if (!action_param) 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 214 kunit_exec_run_tests(&suite_set); 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 215 else if (strcmp(action_param, "list") == 0) 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 216 kunit_exec_list_tests(&suite_set); 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 217 else 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 218 pr_err("kunit executor: unknown action '%s'\n", action_param); aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 219 e5857d396f35e5 Daniel Latypov 2022-07-09 220 if (filter_glob_param) { /* a copy was made of each suite */ a127b154a8f231 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-14 221 kunit_free_suite_set(suite_set); 5d31f71efcb6bc Daniel Latypov 2021-02-05 222 } 5d31f71efcb6bc Daniel Latypov 2021-02-05 223 1b11063d32d7e1 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-13 224 out: 1b11063d32d7e1 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-13 225 kunit_handle_shutdown(); 1b11063d32d7e1 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-13 226 return err; aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 227 } aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 228
Hi Janusz,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on shuah-kselftest/kunit-fixes] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.5-rc3] [cannot apply to shuah-kselftest/kunit next-20230728] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Janusz-Krzysztofik/kunit-Repo... base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git kunit-fixes patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230728154419.1810177-8-janusz.krzysztofik%40linu... patch subject: [PATCH 3/3] kunit: Allow kunit test modules to use test filtering config: mips-randconfig-r002-20230728 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230729/202307290100.7X8zOW5k-lkp@i...) compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a) reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230729/202307290100.7X8zOW5k-lkp@i...)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307290100.7X8zOW5k-lkp@intel.com/
All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
lib/kunit/executor.c:182:42: warning: declaration of 'struct suite_set' will not be visible outside of this function [-Wvisibility]
182 | static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) | ^
lib/kunit/executor.c:190:25: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct suite_set'
190 | for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) | ~~~~~~~~~^ lib/kunit/executor.c:182:42: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 182 | static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) | ^ lib/kunit/executor.c:190:52: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct suite_set' 190 | for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) | ~~~~~~~~~^ lib/kunit/executor.c:182:42: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 182 | static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) | ^
lib/kunit/executor.c:198:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set'
198 | struct suite_set suite_set = {__kunit_suites_start, __kunit_suites_end}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor.c:198:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 198 | struct suite_set suite_set = {__kunit_suites_start, __kunit_suites_end}; | ^ In file included from lib/kunit/executor.c:230:
lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set'
45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:46:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set' 46 | struct suite_set got; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set' 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:70:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set' 70 | struct suite_set got; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:96:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set' 96 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:96:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 96 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:97:19: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct suite_set' 97 | struct suite_set got; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:96:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct suite_set' 96 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:138:4: warning: cast from 'void (*)(const void *)' to 'kunit_action_t *' (aka 'void (*)(void *)') converts to incompatible function type [-Wcast-function-type-strict] 138 | (kunit_action_t *)kfree, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2 warnings and 9 errors generated.
vim +190 lib/kunit/executor.c
9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 181 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 @182 static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 183 { e5857d396f35e5 Daniel Latypov 2022-07-09 184 struct kunit_suite * const *suites; 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 185 struct kunit_case *test_case; 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 186 6c738b52316c58 Rae Moar 2022-11-23 187 /* Hack: print a ktap header so kunit.py can find the start of KUnit output. */ 6c738b52316c58 Rae Moar 2022-11-23 188 pr_info("KTAP version 1\n"); 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 189 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 @190 for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) e5857d396f35e5 Daniel Latypov 2022-07-09 191 kunit_suite_for_each_test_case((*suites), test_case) { e5857d396f35e5 Daniel Latypov 2022-07-09 192 pr_info("%s.%s\n", (*suites)->name, test_case->name); 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 193 } 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 194 } 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 195 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 196 int kunit_run_all_tests(void) 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 197 { e5857d396f35e5 Daniel Latypov 2022-07-09 @198 struct suite_set suite_set = {__kunit_suites_start, __kunit_suites_end}; 1b11063d32d7e1 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-13 199 int err = 0; d20a6ba5e3be5f Joe Fradley 2022-08-23 200 if (!kunit_enabled()) { d20a6ba5e3be5f Joe Fradley 2022-08-23 201 pr_info("kunit: disabled\n"); d20a6ba5e3be5f Joe Fradley 2022-08-23 202 goto out; d20a6ba5e3be5f Joe Fradley 2022-08-23 203 } aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 204 a02353f491622e Daniel Latypov 2022-05-11 205 if (filter_glob_param) { a02353f491622e Daniel Latypov 2022-05-11 206 suite_set = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, filter_glob_param, &err); a02353f491622e Daniel Latypov 2022-05-11 207 if (err) { a02353f491622e Daniel Latypov 2022-05-11 208 pr_err("kunit executor: error filtering suites: %d\n", err); 1b11063d32d7e1 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-13 209 goto out; a02353f491622e Daniel Latypov 2022-05-11 210 } a02353f491622e Daniel Latypov 2022-05-11 211 } 45dcbb6f5ef78b Brendan Higgins 2020-08-04 212 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 213 if (!action_param) 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 214 kunit_exec_run_tests(&suite_set); 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 215 else if (strcmp(action_param, "list") == 0) 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 216 kunit_exec_list_tests(&suite_set); 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 217 else 9c6b0e1d8993e4 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 218 pr_err("kunit executor: unknown action '%s'\n", action_param); aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 219 e5857d396f35e5 Daniel Latypov 2022-07-09 220 if (filter_glob_param) { /* a copy was made of each suite */ a127b154a8f231 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-14 221 kunit_free_suite_set(suite_set); 5d31f71efcb6bc Daniel Latypov 2021-02-05 222 } 5d31f71efcb6bc Daniel Latypov 2021-02-05 223 1b11063d32d7e1 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-13 224 out: 1b11063d32d7e1 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-13 225 kunit_handle_shutdown(); 1b11063d32d7e1 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-13 226 return err; aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 227 } aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 228
Hi Janusz,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on shuah-kselftest/kunit-fixes] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.5-rc3] [cannot apply to shuah-kselftest/kunit next-20230728] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Janusz-Krzysztofik/kunit-Repo... base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git kunit-fixes patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230728154419.1810177-8-janusz.krzysztofik%40linu... patch subject: [PATCH 3/3] kunit: Allow kunit test modules to use test filtering config: i386-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230729/202307290255.bxxn7jm8-lkp@i...) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230729/202307290255.bxxn7jm8-lkp@i...)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307290255.bxxn7jm8-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
lib/kunit/executor.c:182:42: warning: 'struct suite_set' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration 182 | static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) | ^~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor.c: In function 'kunit_exec_list_tests': lib/kunit/executor.c:190:32: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct suite_set' 190 | for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) | ^~ lib/kunit/executor.c:190:59: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct suite_set' 190 | for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) | ^~ lib/kunit/executor.c: In function 'kunit_run_all_tests': lib/kunit/executor.c:198:16: error: variable 'suite_set' has initializer but incomplete type 198 | struct suite_set suite_set = {__kunit_suites_start, __kunit_suites_end}; | ^~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor.c:198:39: warning: excess elements in struct initializer 198 | struct suite_set suite_set = {__kunit_suites_start, __kunit_suites_end}; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor.c:198:39: note: (near initialization for 'suite_set') lib/kunit/executor.c:198:61: warning: excess elements in struct initializer 198 | struct suite_set suite_set = {__kunit_suites_start, __kunit_suites_end}; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor.c:198:61: note: (near initialization for 'suite_set') lib/kunit/executor.c:198:26: error: storage size of 'suite_set' isn't known 198 | struct suite_set suite_set = {__kunit_suites_start, __kunit_suites_end}; | ^~~~~~~~~
lib/kunit/executor.c:198:26: warning: unused variable 'suite_set' [-Wunused-variable]
In file included from lib/kunit/executor.c:230: lib/kunit/executor_test.c: In function 'filter_suites_test': lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:16: error: variable 'suite_set' has initializer but incomplete type 45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:40: error: 'struct suite_set' has no member named 'start' 45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:48: warning: excess elements in struct initializer 45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:48: note: (near initialization for 'suite_set') lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:59: error: 'struct suite_set' has no member named 'end' 45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:65: warning: excess elements in struct initializer 45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:65: note: (near initialization for 'suite_set') lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:26: error: storage size of 'suite_set' isn't known 45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:46:26: error: storage size of 'got' isn't known 46 | struct suite_set got; | ^~~ In file included from lib/kunit/executor.c:4: include/kunit/test.h:737:29: warning: passing argument 1 of 'IS_ERR_OR_NULL' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] 737 | if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__ptr)) \ | ^~~~~ | | | int include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:54:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 54 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:36, from arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5, from arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:53, from include/linux/thread_info.h:60, from arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:9, from include/linux/preempt.h:79, from include/linux/smp.h:110, from include/linux/lockdep.h:14, from include/linux/mutex.h:17, from include/linux/notifier.h:14, from include/linux/reboot.h:6, from lib/kunit/executor.c:3: include/linux/err.h:70:68: note: expected 'const void *' but argument is of type 'int' 70 | static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__force const void *ptr) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:64: warning: initialization of 'const void *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:510:49: note: in definition of macro '_KUNIT_FAILED' 510 | const struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:23: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT' 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:54:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 54 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:64: note: (near initialization for '__assertion.value') 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:510:49: note: in definition of macro '_KUNIT_FAILED' 510 | const struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:23: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT' 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:54:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 54 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:737:29: warning: passing argument 1 of 'IS_ERR_OR_NULL' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] 737 | if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__ptr)) \ | ^~~~~ | | | int include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:59:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 59 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/err.h:70:68: note: expected 'const void *' but argument is of type 'int' 70 | static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__force const void *ptr) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:64: warning: initialization of 'const void *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:510:49: note: in definition of macro '_KUNIT_FAILED' 510 | const struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:23: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT' 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:59:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 59 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:64: note: (near initialization for '__assertion.value') 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:510:49: note: in definition of macro '_KUNIT_FAILED' 510 | const struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:23: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT' 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:59:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 59 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lib/kunit/executor_test.c:46:26: warning: unused variable 'got' [-Wunused-variable]
46 | struct suite_set got; | ^~~
lib/kunit/executor_test.c:45:26: warning: unused variable 'suite_set' [-Wunused-variable]
45 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c: In function 'filter_suites_test_glob_test': lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:16: error: variable 'suite_set' has initializer but incomplete type 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:40: error: 'struct suite_set' has no member named 'start' 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:48: warning: excess elements in struct initializer 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:48: note: (near initialization for 'suite_set') lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:59: error: 'struct suite_set' has no member named 'end' 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:65: warning: excess elements in struct initializer 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:65: note: (near initialization for 'suite_set') lib/kunit/executor_test.c:69:26: error: storage size of 'suite_set' isn't known 69 | struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; | ^~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:70:26: error: storage size of 'got' isn't known 70 | struct suite_set got; | ^~~ include/kunit/test.h:737:29: warning: passing argument 1 of 'IS_ERR_OR_NULL' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] 737 | if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__ptr)) \ | ^~~~~ | | | int include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:78:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 78 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/err.h:70:68: note: expected 'const void *' but argument is of type 'int' 70 | static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__force const void *ptr) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:64: warning: initialization of 'const void *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:510:49: note: in definition of macro '_KUNIT_FAILED' 510 | const struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:23: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT' 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:78:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 78 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:64: note: (near initialization for '__assertion.value') 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:510:49: note: in definition of macro '_KUNIT_FAILED' 510 | const struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:23: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT' 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:78:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 78 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:737:29: warning: passing argument 1 of 'IS_ERR_OR_NULL' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] 737 | if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__ptr)) \ | ^~~~~ | | | int include/kunit/test.h:1418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION' 1418 | KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1415:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG' 1415 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, ptr, NULL) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/executor_test.c:83:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL' 83 | KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/err.h:70:68: note: expected 'const void *' but argument is of type 'int' 70 | static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__force const void *ptr) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ include/kunit/test.h:744:64: warning: initialization of 'const void *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] 744 | KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ | ^~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:510:49: note: in definition of macro '_KUNIT_FAILED'
vim +/suite_set +198 lib/kunit/executor.c
9c6b0e1d8993e47 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 195 9c6b0e1d8993e47 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 196 int kunit_run_all_tests(void) 9c6b0e1d8993e47 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 197 { e5857d396f35e59 Daniel Latypov 2022-07-09 @198 struct suite_set suite_set = {__kunit_suites_start, __kunit_suites_end}; 1b11063d32d7e11 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-13 199 int err = 0; d20a6ba5e3be5f8 Joe Fradley 2022-08-23 200 if (!kunit_enabled()) { d20a6ba5e3be5f8 Joe Fradley 2022-08-23 201 pr_info("kunit: disabled\n"); d20a6ba5e3be5f8 Joe Fradley 2022-08-23 202 goto out; d20a6ba5e3be5f8 Joe Fradley 2022-08-23 203 } aac35468ca20a3a Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 204 a02353f491622e4 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-11 205 if (filter_glob_param) { a02353f491622e4 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-11 206 suite_set = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, filter_glob_param, &err); a02353f491622e4 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-11 207 if (err) { a02353f491622e4 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-11 208 pr_err("kunit executor: error filtering suites: %d\n", err); 1b11063d32d7e11 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-13 209 goto out; a02353f491622e4 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-11 210 } a02353f491622e4 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-11 211 } 45dcbb6f5ef78b0 Brendan Higgins 2020-08-04 212 9c6b0e1d8993e47 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 213 if (!action_param) 9c6b0e1d8993e47 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 214 kunit_exec_run_tests(&suite_set); 9c6b0e1d8993e47 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 215 else if (strcmp(action_param, "list") == 0) 9c6b0e1d8993e47 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 216 kunit_exec_list_tests(&suite_set); 9c6b0e1d8993e47 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 217 else 9c6b0e1d8993e47 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-30 218 pr_err("kunit executor: unknown action '%s'\n", action_param); aac35468ca20a3a Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 219 e5857d396f35e59 Daniel Latypov 2022-07-09 220 if (filter_glob_param) { /* a copy was made of each suite */ a127b154a8f2317 Daniel Latypov 2021-09-14 221 kunit_free_suite_set(suite_set); 5d31f71efcb6bce Daniel Latypov 2021-02-05 222 } 5d31f71efcb6bce Daniel Latypov 2021-02-05 223 1b11063d32d7e11 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-13 224 out: 1b11063d32d7e11 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-13 225 kunit_handle_shutdown(); 1b11063d32d7e11 Daniel Latypov 2022-05-13 226 return err; aac35468ca20a3a Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 227 } aac35468ca20a3a Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 228
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Janusz Krzysztofik -
kernel test robot