When we reconfigure the SVE vector length we discard the backing storage for the SVE vectors and then reallocate on next SVE use, leaving the SME specific state alone. This means that we do not enable SME traps if they were already disabled. That means that userspace code can enter streaming mode without trapping, putting the task in a state where if we try to save the state of the task we will fault.

Since the ABI does not specify that changing the SVE vector length disturbs SME state, and since SVE code may not be aware of SME code in the process, we shouldn't simply discard any ZA state. Instead immediately reallocate the storage for SVE, and disable SME if we change the SVE vector length while there is no SME state active.

Disabling SME traps on SVE vector length changes would make the overall code more complex since we would have a state where we have valid SME state stored but might get a SME trap.

Fixes: 9e4ab6c89109 ("arm64/sme: Implement vector length configuration prctl()s") Reported-by: David Spickett David.Spickett@arm.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org --- arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c index 7a1aeb95d7c3..89d54a5242d1 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c @@ -847,6 +847,8 @@ void sve_sync_from_fpsimd_zeropad(struct task_struct *task) int vec_set_vector_length(struct task_struct *task, enum vec_type type, unsigned long vl, unsigned long flags) { + bool free_sme = false; + if (flags & ~(unsigned long)(PR_SVE_VL_INHERIT | PR_SVE_SET_VL_ONEXEC)) return -EINVAL; @@ -897,21 +899,36 @@ int vec_set_vector_length(struct task_struct *task, enum vec_type type, task->thread.fp_type = FP_STATE_FPSIMD; }

- if (system_supports_sme() && type == ARM64_VEC_SME) { - task->thread.svcr &= ~(SVCR_SM_MASK | - SVCR_ZA_MASK); - clear_thread_flag(TIF_SME); + if (system_supports_sme()) { + if (type == ARM64_VEC_SME || + !(task->thread.svcr & (SVCR_SM_MASK | SVCR_ZA_MASK))) { + /* + * We are changing the SME VL or weren't using + * SME anyway, discard the state and force a + * reallocation. + */ + task->thread.svcr &= ~(SVCR_SM_MASK | + SVCR_ZA_MASK); + clear_thread_flag(TIF_SME); + free_sme = true; + } }

if (task == current) put_cpu_fpsimd_context();

/* - * Force reallocation of task SVE and SME state to the correct - * size on next use: + * Free the changed states if they are not in use, SME will be + * reallocated to the correct size on next use and we just + * allocate SVE now in case it is needed for use in streaming + * mode. */ - sve_free(task); - if (system_supports_sme() && type == ARM64_VEC_SME) + if (system_supports_sve()) { + sve_free(task); + sve_alloc(task, true); + } + + if (free_sme) sme_free(task);

task_set_vl(task, type, vl);

On a system with both SVE and SME when we change one of the VLs this should not result in a change in the other VL. Add a check that this is in fact the case to vec-syscfg.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org --- tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c index 58ea4bde5be7..5f648b97a06f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c @@ -554,7 +554,8 @@ static void prctl_set_onexec(struct vec_data *data) /* For each VQ verify that setting via prctl() does the right thing */ static void prctl_set_all_vqs(struct vec_data *data) { - int ret, vq, vl, new_vl; + int ret, vq, vl, new_vl, i; + int orig_vls[ARRAY_SIZE(vec_data)]; int errors = 0;

if (!data->min_vl || !data->max_vl) { @@ -563,6 +564,9 @@ static void prctl_set_all_vqs(struct vec_data *data) return; }

+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vec_data); i++) + orig_vls[i] = vec_data[i].rdvl(); + for (vq = SVE_VQ_MIN; vq <= SVE_VQ_MAX; vq++) { vl = sve_vl_from_vq(vq);

@@ -585,6 +589,22 @@ static void prctl_set_all_vqs(struct vec_data *data) errors++; }

+ /* Did any other VLs change? */ + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vec_data); i++) { + if (&vec_data[i] == data) + continue; + + if (!(getauxval(vec_data[i].hwcap_type) & vec_data[i].hwcap)) + continue; + + if (vec_data[i].rdvl() != orig_vls[i]) { + ksft_print_msg("%s VL changed from %d to %d\n", + vec_data[i].name, orig_vls[i], + vec_data[i].rdvl()); + errors++; + } + } + /* Was that the VL we asked for? */ if (new_vl == vl) continue;