On 05/22/2018 09:49 AM, David Miller wrote:

From: Shuah Khan shuah@kernel.org Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 09:43:28 -0600

...

On 05/18/2018 10:21 AM, Vlad Buslov wrote:

...

Test 6fb4 creates one mirred and one pipe action, but only flushes mirred on teardown. Leaking pipe action causes failures in other tests.

Add additional teardown command to also flush gact actions.

Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov vladbu@mellanox.com

tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/mirred.json | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/mirred.json b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/mirred.json index 443c9b3..acb24f7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/mirred.json +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/mirred.json @@ -44,7 +44,8 @@ "matchPattern": "action order [0-9]*: mirred \(Egress Redirect to device lo\).*index 2 ref", "matchCount": "1", "teardown": [

•        "$TC actions flush action mirred"
  

•        "$TC actions flush action mirred",
  

•        "$TC actions flush action gact"
     ]
  

  }, {

I can get this into 4.18-rc1 unless there is a reason for this to go through net tree.

Why wouldn't a networking testing bug fix go through my tree?

I usually take the selftest patches unless there is dependency on another tree. I am fine with it going through net tree

Acked-by: Shuah Khan (Samsung OSG) shuah@kernel.org

thanks, -- Shuah -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html